Share About the Federal Reserve

 By Anna Von Reitz

This came over the transom this morning from Richard Martin via the "Prepare for Change" website, and the Author.  I have only one thing to add and I will add it after reposting Chris Black's Article.

[Campers, I suggest that you all send a copy of Chris' Article to every member of Congress and as many local and State of State Officials, including the Governor and the State of State Secretary of State--- as possible.  Be sure Ron Paul gets a copy!] 

If this doesn't wake someone up somewhere, it surely should. 

_______  https://prepareforchange.net/2022/12/06/the-truth-about-the-federal-reserve/  

The Truth About the Federal Reserve

by Chris Black

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says it will back each Federal Reserve Note in circulation with forty cents of gold.

They don’t do this.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that bankers are to be held personally responsible if they fail.

They are not.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says if a Fed bank is insolvent, it is to become the property of the US.

It doesn’t.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that insolvent Fed banks shall forfeit their shares in their Regional Fed.

They don’t.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that it will use its profits to supplement the gold reserve and pay down any US debt.

It definitely doesn’t do this. lol

The Federal Reserve has 3 mandates —people now only talk about the dual mandates, which are stable prices and low unemployment—the third mandate is to keep long term interest rates constant.

They don’t do this.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that the Fed will maintain parity of all forms of legal money issued by the US and strengthen the gold reserve.

They don’t do this.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Fed Board will audit Fed banks at will.

They don’t do this.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says its by-laws are not to violate US law.

They do.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that Fed banks cannot discount stocks or commercial paper.

They do.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says each Fed bank will maintain a surplus fund from its profits, up to 40% of its paid-in capital stock.

They don’t do this.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Fed Board will supervise Fed banks.

They don’t.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says Fed banks will publish complete details weekly of their assets and liabilities, as well as the nature of their transactions.

They don’t do this.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Fed is required to write off worthless assets on its books.

It doesn’t do this.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says it is to have reserves in gold equal to 35% of its deposits.

It doesn’t do this.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says it will maintain a gold account at the Treasury.

It doesn’t do this.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Fed’s franchise will be forfeited if they violate law.

It is not.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that Federal Reserve Notes will be redeemed for gold.

They’re not.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says Fed bank owners will be held responsible for all Fed bank debts and contracts.

They aren’t.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says US Treasury yields are to be paid in tax-free gold.

They aren’t.

Gold is mentioned 53 times and on 11/25 pages.

The word gold is littered throughout the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, basing one promise after another on GOLD.

It was the ONLY reason the legislation passed.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Federal Reserve will not pay any income tax, its shareholders will receive a 6% dividend or the yield on a US 10-year treasury (whichever is lower) and also to have all their expenses paid.

They did manage to uphold these parts of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

Why do we have a Federal Reserve again?

----------------

My comment: Section 15 of the Federal Reserve Act serves as its Enabling Clause because it contains the very-veiled remedy to the Federal Reserve Act -- our right of redemption, without which the Federal Reserve Act is illegal.  But, because the remedy was never fully and intelligibly disclosed to the Public and no instructions were provided to allow access to the remedy, bad faith and deceit and obstruction are evident, with the result that the Federal Reserve Act is still illegal.  

Remedy obstructed results in crime unabated. 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 3900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Money, Credit, and Stupidity

 By Anna Von Reitz

Hunter Aki has a Private Membership Association called the Global Family Group.  I don't belong to it or any other Private Membership Association (PMA).  As part of the PMA he has a Prosperity Program for willing investors.  Now, rumors have surfaced that some investors in the Prosperity Program haven't been paid according to their expectations. 

None of this has anything to do with the banks. None of it has anything to do with me.  

Yet certain unscrupulous or otherwise witless people, have sought to involve me and blame me for this alleged "crisis" in the PMA Prosperity Program. 

To date, nobody has produced a contract that has been breached.  Nobody has come forward and said, "I was promised this and I got that."  and provided an affidavit and supporting evidence for any complaint.  Nobody has proven any wrong-doing or failed obligation, yet there is all this clack, clack, clack ---- and when I ask the Complainers to prove up on their complaint, everything goes silent.   

Crickets.  No broken contracts have landed on my desk a week after the purported crisis began.  

This tells me one of two things --- there is no actual problem and this is being trumped up as a publicity "hit" on Hunter (and they are trying to make it a hit on me) or this is a problem and the Complainers are culpable --- there's something they don't want to show me in the contract, most likely something that invalidates their complaints. 

This is not my first trip to the rodeo.  They've opened the chute but no bull has come out.  

Think hard. 

The other thing that has surfaced is a basic misunderstanding about actual lawful money and credit.  

International Trade Banks deal in gold, silver, gems, etc.,--- actual, factual assets, and trade using money that is: (a)  based on actual, factual assets --- like Silver Certificates or (b) coinage or gold-bearing bills --- actual bills similar to what you are used to, that carry a layer of gold equal to the face value of the bill. 

So, we have ordered 55,000 Metric Tons of American gold to the United States Mint to be made into American Gold Eagle coins, which everyone is familiar with.  And we are looking at various options to produce gold-bearing bills and calling this new currency the American Federation Dollar to distinguish it from the silver-based United States Silver Dollar and Silver Certificates (Certificates are never lawful money per se because they didn't have the silver embedded in the bills, but they are redeemable warehouse receipts for lawful money called "Money Orders" or what a banker would call a "lawful money cash value receipt".) 

We are making good progress to open up our International Trade Banks and supply them with --- you guessed it ---- lawful money.  

Commercial banks deal in what is called "commercial paper" --- which creates representations of accounts, filled with "money of account" ---which is credit, not actual money.  Mortgages, securities, stocks, bonds, promissory notes, letters of credit, bank drafts, checks, court judgements, debits, liens, and so on are examples of commercial paper instruments.  These instruments have no value in-and-of themselves and they generally represent no specific asset; they are created from paper and thin air, yet because of legal tender laws, they have to be exchanged as if they were actual money and they have to be "accounted" in the same way. Such instruments have to be "monetized" by a bank which creates more fiat currency and ledgers it into the accounts of the bank. 

One way to look at this is that one form, asset-backed money, is the currency of physical things, while commercial paper is the currency of performances -- labor, usury, debt, credit owed, and so on.  

Not surprisingly these are two completely different systems, which is why we have International Trade Banks and Commercial Banks, both.  

Both banks ledger assets, howbeit, of different kinds.  Both banks keep accounts, the trade bank accounts for actual money and the commercial bank accounts for credit assets.  

It should be apparent from this that you can have digits standing either for the value of physical assets or standing for the value of labor/performance assets --- actual money or credit, either one, can be expressed in term of dollars and cents. 

So, in September, with threats of bank bail-ins mounting to a fever pitch and threats from the Commercial banks to "wipe" their accounts and more threats from the Biden Administration to purposefully "put inflation on steroids" I suggested the obvious -- that the only safe place to put your "credits" from the Commercial Bank System --- might be The Global Family International 

Trade Bank, which is, generally speaking, the only International Trade Bank open to the Public right now.  

What happens when you take credit to a trade bank?   It has to be "lawfully converted" into actual money.  It comes out of the airy-fairy world of commercial credit that can be created or destroyed or "revalued" at whim, and enters the realm of terra firma.  Doing this provides some very substantial benefits in times like these --- first, actual money can't be "bailed in" or "wiped off" a bank's balance sheet without any consequence; second, actual money holds its value no matter what inflation does or doesn't do.  It acts as its own natural hedge fund. 

So some people took their increasingly worthless Federal Reserve Debt Notes to The Global Family Commercial Bank and denominated these I.O.U.'s as lawful money, and The Global Family Commercial Bank dutifully did what they requested and converted the credit evidenced by the debt notes into lawful money which The Global Family International Trade Bank ledgered onto its balance sheet.  

Their "money" --- that is, credit --- didn't disappear; it was converted into actual asset-backed money and ledgered by the International Trade Bank according to their own directions. 

Now, because we are still in the process of minting and printing the cash value gold coins and gold-bearing bills, there is no physical medium available to pay them out and some of the dimmer wits among us are panicking and trying to cause a bank run because of this. 

They should have been prepared to leave their assets safely bulwarked in the Trade Bank for the very reasons that they placed it in the Trade Bank to begin with, and short of an emergency, been content to wait until our new asset-backed currency is released.  

If they think their activities are going to collapse our bank and give them an opportunity to commandeer what we've worked for, they will be sadly disappointed. Their actual money assets can be converted right back into credit and they will be back where they started --- holding onto increasingly worthless debts owed to them by a bankrupt commercial corporation, facing the End Game where the commercial banks "wipe the books" because of the bankruptcy. 

You all know how bankruptcy works, don't you?  The court takes charge of the bankrupt entity and assigns a Trustee to divvy up the assets among the creditors, and when there's no more to distribute, all the lesser creditors suck wind.  

All these people now spreading rumors and unfounded suspicions and blame and all the rest of it are Lesser Creditors who stand to lose everything they've got --- and they are running straight back into the fire, even after they were given a way out.  

So let me voice some suspicions of my own.  The man who is complaining that he didn't get his 5% interest got his rent paid for and a free education.  The man who accused Hunter of running a Ponzi Scheme was also getting free rent and and education. And now he's doing the same thing that Hunter has done, selling what he learned to much bigger clients than Al and Joanne down the street.  Go figure. The women who are chasing around like the Harpies from Hell and being faithless and gossiping and  trying to tear down what they helped to build get very low marks for good sense.  They are trying to blame me for something they constructed.  

Go figure again.

I am telling you flat out, that unless we stand together, support each other,  and bring forward the Truth about this and everything else,  the world economy is going to resemble a flaming bag of dog dung left on someone's front porch --- yours. 

You'd all better pray that all the efforts being made now succeed, including Hunter's efforts.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Deliberate "Misunderstanding" About The Articles of Confederation

 By Anna Von Reitz

Use your heads. 

Pay attention to the American Government that is intact and functioning -- not the portions of it that were blown away back in 1860. 

The actual progression of the development of our government reads like this: 

July 1776 --- The United Colonies create the United States

September 1776 -- the United States adopts a Federation: The United States of America

January 1777 -- Discussion begins concerning a Confederation

November 1777 -- Articles of Confederation sent to the States for ratification

February 1781 -- Articles of Confederation are ratified

March 1, 1781 -- Articles of Confederation take effect

As everyone can see, the Union doing business as the United States and the Federation of States both pre-date the Confederation by almost five years, and after the Articles were ratified, what happened?  

Both the Union doing business as the United States and the Federation of States doing business as The United States of America continued to do business.  

The only thing that changed is that a new entity called the States of America, the Confederation, began doing business, specifically in Maritime jurisdiction.  

So the United States didn't go away and neither did The United States of America --- they were not "replaced" by the Confederation; instead, the Confederation was another, second, instrumentality of the United States.  

You have a Federation and you have a Confederation. Both.  Both of these instrumentalities were formed by the United States which was formed by the United Colonies, and the expressed purpose on the part of the United States was to provide itself with non-competitive representation in foreign jurisdictions. 

This is because the United States (after 1851, The United States) holds the National Soil Jurisdiction, which the Founders deliberately isolated from foreign interference. 

The United States of America handled all international and global business for the United States from 1776 to 1781.  

After the States of America, otherwise known as the Confederation was ratified, the global (Maritime Commerce) business was split off from the duties of The United States of America and became the responsibility of the States of America.  

The States of the Union are the Members of the Federation: Ohio, Maine, New York, Florida, etc. 

The States of States (business organizations serving the States) are the members of the Confederation: The State of Ohio, The State of Maine, The State of New York, The State of Florida, and so on. 

And so it remained until 1787, when the Confederation spawned its own instrumentality, known as the Federal Republic, which operated under the Federal Constitution known as The Constitution for the united States of America.  

Notice that the name of the Confederation -- "States of America" is identical to the nomenclature in "The Constitution for the united States of America".  

The States agreed to have the States-of-States and their Confederation  manage the day-to-day business affairs of the Federal Republic, which was made responsible for exercising  the 18 enumerated delegated "Powers" on behalf of the States..  

But Notice the Chain of Delegation of Power: all the Powers flow from the States to the United States (after 1851, The United States), then to The United States of America, then to the States of America, and finally, to the Federal Republic.  

Notice that the States are the only true sovereign entities. The Union dba United States, the Federation dba The United States of America and the Confederation dba States of America all perform work for and are empowered by the Several States. 

Everything worked fine from 1787 until 1860 when the Southern States-of-States -- members of the original Confederation walked out, and left the Confederation without the quorum necessary to conduct business.  

As a result, the Confederation could no longer operate and neither could the Federal Republic which was overseen and funded by the Confederation.  

The Constitution for the united States of America went dormant along with the Confederation and the Federal Republic, awaiting a Reconstruction that never happened. 

Meantime, what happened to the United States and its Federation of States doing business as The United States of America?  

Neither one was ever involved in the American Civil War which was fought entirely by the ex-Members of the original, broken Confederation and the other (foreign British and Papal) Federal Subcontractors.  

The Northern States-of-States and the British Territorial Federal Subcontractors working under The Constitution of the United States of America formed "the Union" while the Southern States-of-States that broke off from the Confederation joined with the Municipal United States (Holy See) working under The Constitution of the United States to form the Confederate States of America. 

We all know how that turned out. 

All that remains of the original American Government are the States, the Union of States doing business as The United States (since 1851) and The United States of America, our Federation of States. 

In 1851 the original name of the United States was formalized as The United States, while the Municipal Government working under The Constitution of the United States, continued to call itself "the United States" --- thus creating a confusion between itself and the original Union of States doing business as "the United States" from 1776 to 1851 when the nomenclature changed. 

A similar confusion exists concerning the original Union of States forming the United States in 1776 and "the Union" formed by the Northern States-of-States in 1860.  

But we are not here to be confused.  We are here to be enlightened by the facts and our own ability to observe the facts --- chief among them: 

The States created the Federation and the Confederation and only the sovereign States have the power and authority to reconstruct the Confederation. 

The Confederation created, directed, and funded the Federal Republic, and without the Confederation, the only entity competent and having proven standing to operate the Federal Republic is The United States of America, our unincorporated Federation of States. 

Why do we deduce that?  

The United States of America conducted all international and global business for the United States from 1776 to 1781; obviously, the creation of the Confederation was a convenience, but not necessary.  Likewise, the reconstruction of the Confederation would be a convenience, but not necessary for the Federation to run the Federal Republic.by assuming the contract and resuming operations under The Constitution for the united States of America. 

All these claims by incorporated organizations are rendered invalid by the fact of their incorporation under the auspices of foreign governments.  Currently, the Government of India has unwisely chosen to allow the incorporation of a commercial entity calling itself "The United States of America, Incorporated" --- which is an infringement upon our venerable trademarks and an attempted impersonation of our unincorporated Federation of States to which we object. 

It's time for everyone concerned to figure out the difference between incorporated and unincorporated business entities, to know what "impersonation" and crimes of impersonation are, and for the Principals responsible for this Mess to stop obfuscating and trying to manipulate the situation into something to benefit themselves.  

They have benefited themselves at the expense of their Employers and Employees alike for 162 years as of this writing, and that is more than enough.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

About Lloyd Austin --- And Joe Biden, Too

 By Anna Von Reitz

Rumors are circulating today that members of the U.S. Military have received accusatory letters from Lloyd Austin, broadly inferring that these men and women owe him and his political party allegiance and obedience. 

But they don't. 

Hard as I have tried for many long days, I can't find evidence that Joe Biden is "President" of anything but a privately held Municipal Corporation doing business as the White House Office, Inc. 

How much authority does such a "Presidency" offer?  Certainly none that would impact officers working for a completely different corporation.  

It's like the Vice-President of McDonald's sending a Nasty Note to Burger King employees.

Or the old Abbott and Costello routine, "Who is on first?" 

These corporations have been threatening to go to war with each other for some time, but we have reminded them and everyone else concerned that mercenary conflicts (wars between commercial entities) are illegal, and they have no right to trample as much as a cubic centimeter of their Employer's land and soil.  

If the Municipal Corporations keep it up, we will simply observe that they are in violation of the treaties and contracts that allow their existence, and annex back the land and soil under Washington, DC, leaving them without a seat of government.  

And if the Territorial Corporations don't get moving to protect us, we can pretty much do the same thing with the entire District of Columbia. 

Both these corporations need to fulfill their contracts and treaties, in order to retain any delegated powers----- absent which, we don't owe them any separate seats of government. 

It's like having two teenagers fighting over which bunk bed they get, until the parents get sick of it and leave them both sleeping on the floor.  

The strength and power of our government isn't vested in corporations, especially not foreign corporations.  The strength and power of our government is vested in our physical assets, including our people and our natural resources.  

The faster everyone wakes up and realizes that corporations are fictional and don't mean diddly compared to the actual unincorporated government, the better.  And the sooner Lloyd Austin is made aware of the limitations of his position, the better, too. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 3900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

On Being Sold a Bill of Goods -- Public Notice to China

 By Anna Von Reitz

Dear China/CHINA, 

You have been "sold a Bill of Goods" --- don't feel bad.  The same imposters tried to pull the same thing on us, and almost succeeded. 

Time to assess what you actually acquired from them, which is stolen property and non-existent debt. 

The actual international law that pertains to this situation is: "Possession by pirates does not change ownership." 

What you have acquired by purchase and by claims of indebtedness, known as the "UNITED STATES, INC." has no assets or trademarks of its own.  Everything they had was stolen property.  You acquired debt that was owed to us and no offset accounting was done to mitigate the debt. 

So, you've been swindled and we've been swindled. 

And we all know who and what is at fault in this mess. 

We are passing on this information to the U.S. Military, which will not be allowed to stand down if China attempts any action against this country, and we are inviting you to contact us to discuss reparations that are due from the Vatican and the Lord Mayor of the Inner City of London and the British Monarch --- not from us. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America 

In care of: Box 520984

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

avannavon@gmail.com

International Notice -- There Is No Such Thing as a "Sovereign Citizen"

 By Anna Von Reitz

Issued: December 5th of 2022

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. 

This International Notice goes out to all the members of the military, especially the JAG Officers currently trying to function as Provost Marshals, and to the Municipal Officers, especially the Secretary General of the United Nations and the Offices of the Inspector General. 

There is no such thing as a "sovereign citizen". 

This term is an oxymoron. 

One literally cannot be a sovereign and a citizen at the same time. 

We have proof that certain unelected and incompetent Agencies, including the FBI, the DOJ, and various private corporate security officers acting "as" Sheriffs -- without really being Sheriffs --- have developed entire programs and narratives around this inanity and are going around ignorantly teaching others to do the same. 

They are calling these non-existent constructs "Domestic Terrorists" without respect to those whose domesticity is contractually owed protection and support here in this country. 

Time to clean up your respective acts and stop embarrassing yourselves. 

Please get down to the level of your various Subcontractors of Subcontractors -- the "Agencies" which are trying to do work that you are supposed to be doing yourselves --- and fully inform them that there are no "sovereign citizens" for them to deal with.  

There are only American sovereigns reclaiming their reversionary trust interests --- the people who are owed "good faith service" from all of the government contractors and all agencies of the government contractors and the Principals being addressed by this public International Notice. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

News for the World

 By Anna Von Reitz

We are only eighty-one years late. 

Why do I say that?  

Because 81 years ago, in 1941, every country on this planet and all the people living in every country, were supposed to be set free of the scourge of taxation, which, by the way, includes "dead man's taxes" known as mortgages. 

In 1941, a major philanthropic initiative was completed, when the designated Metals Depositors working for us finished their work moving millions of metric tons of gold, silver, platinum and other precious goods into position worldwide to enable this. 

From that point on, there was no longer any need for taxation of any kind. 

But it was also 1941, two years into World War II and no end in sight. Things got a bit confused, gold went missing, priorities changed, governments changed, gold was returned, more gold was found, more governments changed. 

It isn't hard to understand how things got messed up, but certain truths remain. 

1. The Federal Government is required to operate on credit by the Constitutional restraints, whereas the States are required to operate on lawful money; 

2.  The banks and currencies are all operating on private assets, with the exception of investments and endowments made by national governments -- primarily our government, The United States of America --- our unincorporated Federation of States; 

3.  The goal of the private owners of the large gold and silver resource repositories remains the same --- (1) relieve everyone of the illusion of debt; (2) remove the practice of taxation as a means to fund government services and infrastructure; (3) make banking services and access to pre-paid credit available worldwide. 

I was born in 1956, some 25 years after all of this was supposed to be in place and we were all --worldwide-- supposed to be living a much happier life. Most of the members of my family were killed between World War I and World War II and other key people involved in "the 1941 initiative" were also either dead or missing. 

To give you an example of the destruction, just this week my Son found another missing branch of our family, alive and well and living in Munich -- part of our family that we haven't had contact with since WWII. 

It was convenient for the Allies to steal the money they found in the Central Banks and held in safekeeping for us in the Philippines, and so they did.  They pretended not to know us. They ignored our deposit receipts.  They commandeered us into foreign political statuses where we were held to be "paupers" and "wards of the state". 

They did all these evil things to us --all of us, worldwide-- in order to control our money and our resources.  The great and the small, the rich and the poor, were all subjected to their Impersonation Scheme. 

But surely, you say, someone must have known what was going on?  Someone had the proof.  What about the Metal Depositors? The tag team of Severino Sta Romano working for the Vatican (on our behalf) and Giovanni Babtista Richello working for the CIA (on our behalf) to make all these deposits for us?  

They are both long dead.  Severino died in September of 1974.  All the gold deposits were and are entangled in his personal estate.  He did it that way on purpose, because, as he expressed it, he didn't trust "them" to honor their agreements. 

He was right. 

We have the unencumbered and singular right to settle Severino's estate. Everything about this situation has been duly reviewed by the courts and the determinations have been made in our favor. We have the court decisions, we have the records, we have the bank treaties, we have the tax treaties ----and all we want to do is to end this evil system of coercive taxation and enslavement. 

Everyone on Earth stands to greatly benefit by simply allowing us to do what should have been done in 1941. 

We are being opposed by certain of the world's militaries who are being paid by the rats who concocted the enslavement-by-impersonation scheme.  These politicians and bankers responsible are afraid of what the people of this planet will do and what they will demand once they become aware of this situation, but, thank God, more and more people have become aware despite the nearly total media black out. 

You are all supposed to be living in a world of peace and plenty, without 24/7 surveillance, without being treated like criminals, without being coerced by something that merely appears to be "your" government, and without being farmed like sheep. 

You don't owe any "National Debt" because any National Debt has been instantly paid by an equal and answering National Credit that the Vermin have failed to account for.  

You don't owe any interest on any National Debt, either, because the National Debt doesn't exist.  

Every penny of tax that you have all paid since 1941 was collected under False Pretenses and in violation of the Treaties and Agreements that allowed these Vermin to use our gold and silver assets to underwrite their Central Banks. 

And the Central Banks themselves have been used for illegal and unlawful purposes that we never approved of at all.  They have been used for commodity rigging on an unimaginable scale.  They have been used for illegal securitization, even securitization of living flesh, which is enslavement and peonage --- all outlawed worldwide since 1926. 

So when I say that certain of the militaries and the corporations are now engaged in a "policy" of worldwide genocide in an effort to get rid of their Creditors, I am not joking. 

When I observe that these "governmental services corporations" are using their "Uniformed Officers" --- the doctors, nurses, dentists and other health care professionals as soldiers in an undeclared and illegal mercenary war against the civilian population, I am not wrong. 

When I observe that these same "governmental services corporations" are using other licensed "officers"--- Bar Attorneys ---  to improperly and unlawfully run Admiralty Courts on the land as part of their enslavement-by-impersonation scheme, I am not wrong. 

And when I tell you that the banks, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the politicians, and the bureaucrats have all been misdirected to this end by Principals -- the British Monarch, the Lord Mayor of the Inner City of London, and the Holy See --- that owe us good faith and service, I am not wrong. 

This past week I told Satan's Mouthpiece that we now know the difference between good and evil, and that his work here is done. 

He has been dismissed by someone with the authority to dismiss him. 

Please join me and add your voices and effort to mine so that no possible doubt remains.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

They Can’t Hide This Any Longer… Some COVID-19 Patients Have Deadly Venom In Them

36 different shellfish toxins and snake venom are showing up in COVID-19 patients…

How did this end up in their blood, feces, or urine?

Some experts believe this so-called “respiratory” disease is actually an envenomation from the vaccine.

They’ve targeted people with toxins for decades…

Why wouldn’t this be the case now?

Did you know that the word “corona” means “crown for the king” and virus in Latin actually means “venom” so coronavirus very closely translates to “king venom”?

Coincidence? You can be the judge of that, watch the video below…

https://covenomseries.com/

About the Use of Meritorious Planning Committees

 By Anna Von Reitz

It has been suggested that as we go forward so-called Meritorious Planning Committees, similar to those used in traditional Japanese Government, should be used here; but, as usual, there is a fly in the ointment. 

The Japanese System was indeed very beneficial for Japan, but Japan offers a very homogenous culture with few minorities -- ethnically or religiously -- to deal with.  Like the old Swedish System, which worked well for Swedes because of their cultural homogeneity at the time, for the same reasons--- and didn't work in a multicultural country like ours. 

The advantage of being the melting pot of the world is that we benefit from the creativity and diversity of hundreds of other countries' heritages and religions and cuisines and languages and laws and everything else.  

The disadvantage of our total lack of homogeneity is that the would-be "planners" have little or no commonality of vision and values, cultural or otherwise. 

Note what Winston Churchill observed early on about the Americans --- "The Americans always do the right thing --- after they have tried every other alternative." 

Our natural process isn't so much a planning process as a sifting and winnowing process, testing every option like scientists searching for the best theory to explain a given set of facts.  We have little or no cohesive cultural identity to provide the "Group Think" that comes quite naturally to other nations, and it would certainly be a Big Mistake to assume that what works for Japan, with an almost singular cultural identity, and thousands of years of tradition behind it, would work in America. 

It won't.  We have already been there, done that, analyzed that much of our problem, and we know for sure that Meritorious Planning Groups don't work here. What always happens is that the Planners turn into Analyzers.  Immediately after that, a fierce free-for-all ensues, while all the Analyzers analyze everything down to a gnat's eyelash, and then come back around with all the interminable arguments that accrue from every facet of every different viewpoint. 

The end result of our version of "planning" which doesn't result in a plan, by the way, but does result in a conclusion ---- is often a very sound and sober solution to whatever given concern started this process in the first place, but does not allow for the act of planning --- as in projecting a forward path for the future five, ten, twenty or a hundred years down the road. 

Such a prospect is not only foreign, but due to the massive lack of coherent shared cultural values, is a virtual impossibility here. 

Look at the history of this country versus the history of Japan. 

Successive waves of people from vastly different cultural bases have come to America since the Stone Age --- Ancient Egyptians left their hieroglyphs and DNA, Polynesian and Chinese immigrants left their imprints among the Native Peoples on the West Coast, Mound Builders who were red-haired, white-skinned proto-Celtic people who occupied 45 degrees of Latitude on a circumpolar basis, French Armoricans followed the same path as the Egyptians and left their words and DNA and so did the Norsemen, who reached our shores and traded here in prehistory; and, as we moved forward into modern times this so-called "melting pot" phenomenon only accelerated and increased. 

We now have sizable populations of people from every country and nation in the world here, all living under one roof, all counting themselves as Americans, all bringing their culture with them, all inter-marrying more or less freely, all sharing little but the American Dream and our odd version of Football.  

Planning?  Just in the past hundred years we have seen a collapse of the predominantly white European population and a large increase in the Hispanic and Oriental populations, regrowth of the American Indian population, and moderate expansion of the African-sourced population. Who is to say what an "American" will look like or believe a hundred years from now?

Compare this with Japan?  Short of an earth-spanning extinction level event, there will still be pure blooded Japanese living on the Japanese home islands a hundred years from now, and probably a thousand years from now.

They can afford to do long term planning and they have the history and cultural identity to do so without a lot of the "other views" and arguments and uncertainties that we have in this country. 

So when it comes to Meritorious Planning Committees, thanks, we understand that they worked well in the Orient, but please pay attention to the fact that we have vastly different conditions to deal with in the West and especially in North America.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.