By Anna Von ReitzThe Queen is the Agent of the House of Wettin in Britain, and holds a subordinate position to her own Cousin, Lady Somerset, the Dame of Glammis Castle--- the "goddess". This is how and why Continental interests have been bleeding Britain dry for the last eight decades, up to and including the EU and UN. More than half the members of Parliament have personally been on the take and receiving kickbacks from this group of Royal Investors, and still more have been blackmailed by them. It appears to be a collusion between largely Middle Eastern bankers (Muslims and Jews alike) and the various monarchies of Europe seeking to create a new form of Feudalism, which I call "Corporate Feudalism" as it transfers the responsibilities of the Monarch onto the faceless, nameless, unaccountable backs of commercial corporations owned by the Crown, and various other corporations worldwide owned by other investor groups, and all controlled ultimately by the Holy See.
The apparent goal in all of this is to set up a new means to enslave the public as serfs, with all named individuals serving the corporations that "represent" the various states and kingdoms (without being those States or Kingdoms or even necessarily associated with them) and with the Monarchs only serving as figureheads to calm the masses into submission. The object is to control the labor and commodities and natural resources actually owned by the people of the world on a private basis, so as to grossly enrich and empower the few private Parties that control and own both the Crown and the Holy See, and to protect their corporations from such unpleasantries as taxes.
This debasement and dehumanizing of the Monarchy reduces it to the level of any other commercial corporation, whether you call it QEII or ELIZABETH II or LIZZIE, all of which and sundry others have been used as instrumentalities of HER MAJESTY, INC.
This plot subjects the Queen and everything she owns to the authority of the Roman Curia, which makes up all these corporations and other THINGS such as Cooperatives and Limited Liability Partnerships and which serves to define what corporations are and what powers they have and what rules they must abide by and what punishments can be applied to them. It is all bunk--- charlatanism based on the theory and concept of "legal persons" as opposed to "lawful persons", being used to impersonate people and suborn their assets as collateral.
The actual history of this all revolves around criminal misuse and abuse of public trusts that were established under very dubious circumstances, which will be described more fully in our lawful proceedings, but for a good flavor of the actions taken and the results of these actions, please see the United States Federal Code, Title 22, especially the Annotated Revised Statutes at Large.
The history of the Earls of Shovesbury goes back --- not to England, but to the Frankish Kingdom that preceded the First Holy Roman Empire, and a portion of the world that is now considered Southeastern Germany in and around Dresden, and particularly the small town of Issagau, where my own ancestors came from, and the noble family known as the Brakespeares --- for their habit of breaking spears aimed at them, and also, The Order of the Black Arrow, which has its roots in pre-Christian times, but which was much later taken over by the Jesuits and infiltrated by the Nazis.
As is common among the kings and nobles of the Merovingian bloodlines, "v" and "w" -- which is merely a double "v" -- actually stands for the letter-sound "f" in German and related languages, sometimes also written as an "S" in the old handwriting known as Fraktur.
So your name and title on the Continent is different than its later derivative in Britain, and became progressively Anglicized in Britain. Shrovesbury pronounced "Schruffsbeurie" became Shrewsbury, in the same way as the French Belle Cher was Anglicized to Belcher. Both families ultimately came to Britain through France--- directly in the case of the Belle Chers, and via France from Germany in the case of the Bacons -- the von Specks. And that is why to this day, one still hears both Shovesbury and Shrewsbury, Belle Cher and Belcher.... there are many other examples. All date from before the establishment of the First Holy Roman Empire in 800 A.D.
Sir Francis Bacon was the Earl von Speck --- which means "bacon" in German. As in "bringing home the bacon". You can now also better appreciate his pen name, William Shakespeare -- William means "resolute protector" and Shakespeare is a take-off on the family name, "Brakespeare". In retrospect, it is easy to see that William Shakespeare's message was largely addressed as an admonishment to the Tudor Monarchs, including multiple exposes concerning the reasons for the downfall of the Plantagenets as an object lesson.
This also sheds light on the otherwise completely irrational fire-bombing of Dresden, Germany. Dresden was called "Florence on the Elbe" for its great beauty and artistic treasures, it offered absolutely no military targets at all, yet on the fateful night of February 13, 1945, with the Nazi surrender clearly in view, the Allies staged one of the most devastating attacks in military history against this lone, unfortified, unprotected, helpless, beautiful German city. They murdered 135,000 people, many of them refugees from Eastern Europe fleeing to safety, and nobody when called on the carpet for this atrocity had any excuse that made sense. Why Dresden?
Because what was thought to be the only surviving handwritten copy of Martin Luther's 95 Theses was among the city's treasures. All that misery, destruction, and death was rained down on Dresden by the agents of the Pope, superstitiously and malevolently bent on destroying these few pieces of paper. It will perhaps shame them and give them reason to pause and reflect that: (1) there are other copies written in Martin Luther's own hand; and (2) the content of the work is distributed throughout the world so that everyone knows the criticism Luther issued against the Church. Everyone knows about the sale of "Indulgences" allowing rich men to sin. Everyone is now learning about the sale of children --- and the Church's no longer secret reason for opposing abortion, which has more to do with dollar signs than any care for the sanctity of life.
The pagan sacrifice of Dresden by fire, like the Holocaust, like the World Trade Center bombings, has all been for naught.
We can only call the religion of the Enlightened Ones-- the Hanger's On of the long defunct Roman Empire--- "the religion of the Deceivers"---- and none are so deceived as the members of this cult. The phrase, "the smoke of Satan" does not refer to incense. It refers to the smoke from burning and charred flesh, that of people and of animals. It is said to delight Satan, so that's what his followers, who are ultimately the stupid ones among us, try to feed their "god". The members of this Death Cult are within the clinical definition of insane--- self-destructive and destructive of all mankind.
They substituted themselves and their own cult-followers for the lawful rulers of Great Britain and The United States, much as a magician changes hats and promotes an illusion, but once the "spell" of the illusion is broken, it all falls apart. People awaken from their trance and all the black magic, all the seances with the dead, all the consorting with demons, the orgies, the cannibalism, the drug use, the pornography, the blackmail, the "sacrifices" and even the phony money is exposed for what it is.
We have awakened from this nightmare before our kindred and we have sounded the alarm. At first, nobody paid any attention. They were all too busy trying to earn a living and "get ahead" to think beyond their next working day. Finally, things have deteriorated so much and the rot of this "system" is so blatant that everyone who can still think from Point A to Point B can see the lies of their purported leaders and smell the stench of this grotesque corruption. We no longer have to argue about the existence of the corruption of our governments worldwide. The only argument is --- what to do about it?
We have stood for educating people to self-govern since 480 A.D. and we still stand for this, as the only lawful and certain and ultimately, humane, answer. This is in accord with Universal Law and it is amply borne out by our earthly experience. A monarchy may be of some use as a fail-safe or safeguard institution, much as we have served in the present moment to bring forward the Public Law, but the ever-changing nature of inheritance and culture means that absent a conscious sharing of the burden of governance people are too easily misled and abused by a relatively few individuals manipulating commodity markets and currencies and legal systems and mercenary armies.
Our conclusion? People must be taught to govern themselves, to think for themselves, to choose what is right and to know what is right, to grow up and discipline themselves, to exercise the entire range of their potential as individuals, to bear responsibility and to exercise rights. They must be given the education, insight, and resources to do so. The idea that we can or should simply extend the role of parents to the government and via the institution of a Nanny State seek to "free" people from such drudgery, results in those entrusted with the government exercising their power in inappropriate, destructive, criminal ways.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. We have seen this again, and again, and again. There is no rational reason to argue the point.
Power-sharing at an individual level as well as a national level is necessary, just as growing up and accepting the challenges of adulthood is necessary. A free society composed of healthy, honestly educated, empowered, and actively participating people who are fully engaged in rational self-governance, is the only safeguard to overall well-being on this planet. We can't create this healthy dynamic by entrusting our fate to kings or conglomerates. Each one of us has to take responsibility and give a shove in the right direction.
We hope that this little dissertation has shed light upon the darkness of some very unsavory history and circumstances, and may also, we hope, give you some inspiration and needed insight into the broader issues of your own inheritance.