By Anna Von Reitz
There is a tradition of hoaxing and hexing that
came to Britain with the Romans. It quickly caught on, and when the British ---
especially British sailors --- settled in America, they brought this tradition
along.
It is part and parcel of the superstitions of the
Romans and the sea-faring Phoenicians, many of whom worshiped The Father of
All Lies as a deity, because they profited themselves by perpetuating hoaxes and
frauds of all kinds.
If one is to believe one's direct observation and a
British Merchant Mariner's Handbook from 1801 (and 1803 and 1811) all Bar
Attorneys are International Shipping Clerks, supposed to be engaged aboard ships
and in Custom's Houses to direct collection of tariffs and fees as import duties
and taxes, as well as impounding illicit shipments of contraband goods, handling
insurance claims, and cashing out bottomry
bonds.
Well, well, well, what do the astute observe going
on in what are supposed to be our
courtrooms?
There have been active efforts to discredit both
the testimony of Judge Dale and the evidence accrued by Rod Class, to decry the
testimony of Melvin Stamper, author of "Fruit of the Poisonous Tree", and to
claim that I am not a Judge--- which I am in the parochial and popular sense,
though in fact, I am a Justice and outrank a "Judge" by several country
miles.
All these attacks hinge on the presumption of the
perpetrators that they are in possession of some truth, though in fact they are
often the most abject victims of the actual hoaxes involved---- clueless tax
collection agents, law enforcement officials who don't know that there is any
difference between a Law and a Statute, and similar purveyors of common -- but
totally incorrect --- knowledge.
Forgive them, Father, but sock them in the nose for
me.
They need a righteous correction and exposure of
their sins to save their souls.
Here's an example of it that has been admitted by
the perpetrators of the the fraud known as "Black's Law Dictionary", all
published by Reuter's in Canada sixteen (16) years ago, and yet, the so-called
"courts" continue to use Black's Law Dictionary and Law Schools continue to
promote it, and Westlaw continues to publish it---- how's this for a hoax for
you?
Published on: May 28th, 2003, Modified on: May
28th, 2003, Montreal, PQ (Reuters) - Sarah Medhurst (nee Black) shocked
journalists and legal scholars at a press conference held at the Black family
estate Monday when she revealed that Black's Law Dictionary, a highly regarded
legal reference text, was originally written as a joke by her eccentric great
grandfather Henry Campbell Black.
Medhurst appeared unapologetic, suggesting that the
Black family had never tried very hard to keep it a secret. "Have any of you
actually taken the time to read it?” she asked, flipping open the renowned
text.& nbsp; “Look at page 840 for instance. 'John-a-Nokes'? Or how about
page 347? 'Correality – the quality or state of being correal." She then cast a
challenging look around the room.
Medhurst admitted that the entire Black family has
participated in the century-long ruse, working together to generate content for
the ever-expanding text. She credits her Uncle Bertrand with developing one of
their most successful filler techniques: "We created more than 30 new entries
just by using the word 'actual'. Actual agency - see agency. Actual allegiance -
see allegiance. Actual authority - see authority. And on and on - you get the
idea."
Medhurst admits that the family started to get lazy
in later editions, at times resorting to stealing terms from other dictionaries.
"I remember one time my brother pulled 'Le Roi' (literally: "the king") right
out of his French-English dictionary to meet the deadline for the 5th edition
while on a three-week ski trip in the French Alps."
She claims the ploy has been used sparingly,
however, and that the family put a stop to the practice when her brother started
bringing the Official Scrabble Dictionary to editorial
meetings.
Henry Campbell Black had never intended - or even
imagined - that his dictionary would become the authoritative source for legal
terminology. "My great granddad had actually written the text for an upcoming
firm skit night", Medhurst explains. "It was his way of showing how convoluted
and, well, pompous the legal profession had become."
The dictionary became an instant hit, however, and
Henry Black's comedic intentions went unnoticed. When the money started to roll
in, Black elected to pursue a highly lucrative career in legal publishing
instead of becoming a marginally talented prop comic.
When asked why the family is revealing the fake
after all this time, Medhurst stated that they had grown tired of living a lie,
and were genuinely concerned that the universally accepted legal lexicon "is
actually just a bunch of made-up gibberish."
The family is asking that lawyers and students
alike immediately dispose of any editions of Black's Law Dictionary into the
nearest trash receptacle or recycle bin.West Group, the current publisher of
Black's, could not be reached for comment.
So, if their favorite dictionary is a hoax, and
they are supposed to be working as Shipping Clerks in Custom's Houses, how much
more do you really need to know? What has been passing as "the
law" and the courts in this country for the past 150 years is a gigantic
fraud. A combined British and Roman hoax in their grand tradition of Fraud
for Profit.
The Municipal United States Government functions
under Roman Civil Law. A prime chestnut of Roman Civil Law is a Maxim thus
stated: "Let him who will be deceived, be deceived." This means that if
you don't have brains enough to object to the fraud, you get what you deserve
under Roman Law. You get fleeced and the Roman Civil Law will do
nothing to protect you.
However, the same law requires that fraud once
discovered, vitiates everything, clear back to the root of the fraud--- wherever
and whenever it began. This is why every "Act" as in "Actors" and
plays and stages----of the Municipal Congress since the 1860's to today,
contains this one-line disclaimer as part of their Enabling Clause: "This
Act shall not effect any right thus previously
established."
This means that under Roman Civil Law, we are being
constantly Grandfathered-in, with all rights brought forward.
This is so that if they get caught, they can raise
their palms and smirk and say, "See? We didn't actually do anything
wrong."
But they have done a gross amount of damage and
they have acted in criminal Breach of Trust, and they do owe the return of all
our purloined property, all our rights, titles, and interests, plus the profit
from their use and abuse by our "volunteer" usufructs, whose services were never
needed nor requested in this capacity in the first
place.
For the record --- the only Law Dictionary ever
approved for use by our Congress --- is
Bouvier's.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
