Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Monday, November 30, 2015

What is the plan? Show me step by step, is the question we get most often.

From the desk of Judge Anna Von Reitz
November 30, 2015
Big Lake Alaska

The answer is simple--- the counties have to operate as counties on the land again, that is, as UNINCORPORATED Body Politics.  Any time you incorporate something, you move it off the jurisdiction of the land and into the jurisdiction of the sea---- and therein lies the rub. 

Out of 50 "States" and 3100 counties all of them have incorporated and are therefore officially operating as "federal" franchises of the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION---- like local Burger King franchises.  That does not prohibit any of them from ALSO functioning as states and counties on the land jurisdiction, but we've been such clueless dumb clucks that we weren't aware of any need to do so.  We have been deceived and "assumed" that that "thing" calling itself "Jackson County" or the "County of Jackson" was our lawful county on the land --- and that we didn't HAVE TO do anything more or organize anything or operate any Body Politic other than that. 

Now you can talk to the incorporated counties and their officers about this situation and encourage them to act in both roles---putting on one hat and singing the corporate song, and then putting on another hat and singing "Yankee Doodle"---- which is what they did for quite a number of years---- but in the end, no man can serve two masters.  It is best to just hold explicit elections for the land offices---- advertise public meetings to organize the county on the land, take nominations for the offices of the land jurisdiction--- call your courts, etc., by recognizable names like, "Jackson County Land Office" and "Jackson County Common Law Court" and so on.  At first, everyone has to serve pro bono and as volunteers.  That in no way alters the lawfulness of the office or our actions. 

And just let the incorporated "County" deal with its watery international issues and "US citizens" which are in reality few and far between. 

Once you have elected one or two County Judges, a County Sheriff, County Clerk, Bailiff, Coroner, etc., and sworn them in, the Sheriff can in turn (just like John Wayne) swear in as many Deputies on the Land as he needs to enforce the jurisdiction of the land. 

So what is the jurisdiction of the land?  It's everything and anything that was not specifically delegated as an enumerated "power"---and responsibility---- of the "federal government".  ALL other prerogatives are reserved to the States on the Land and the people.  

The position of all these "federal franchise" "States" and "Counties" is actually very weak and unattractive.  They are receiving back increasingly smaller dribs and drabs of "federal revenue sharing"---- which is their cut from the fraud that has been practiced against all of us by claiming that we "volunteered" to function as Federal United States Citizens and as chattel belonging to the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation and donated all our assets to the Public Charitable Trust in exchange for the privilege of receiving welfare benefits (and paying for them) and Social Security "benefits" (which we also had to pay for and never get any reasonable return from).  In other words, their kick-back for participating in the enslavement and abuse of their friends, families, and neighbors by private, mostly foreign-owned corporations follows a law of diminishing returns.   


Once people wake up and realize what a scourge and fraud scheme this has been, nobody will want to serve any "federal" county or "federal" state, either.  

Judge Anna

See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:  www.annavonreitz.com
----------------------------------
Note from Paul Stramer,
It costs a bit to keep this blog going, for the research, the time away from our business, the server space and bandwidth, and the phone to field questions. If you would like to help with that please donate what you can once, or make a monthly contribution.
Here is the PayPal link t
o support this work:


Sunday, November 29, 2015

Dear Federal Agents - From Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

November 28, 2015
Big Lake, Alaska


Dear Federal Agents:

I am addressing this letter in this way, because it is my understanding that it will be read by members of both the FBI and the US Marshals Service.   It is also my understanding that you have available for examination a wet-ink signed copy of the illustrated affidavit of probable cause entitled “You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”  as back-up reference and evidence.

Since the publication of the affidavit a plethora of new supporting documentation and evidence has come to light.  We found, for example, that on June 30, 1864, the members of Congress acting as the Board of Directors of a private, mostly foreign-owned corporation doing business as “The United States of America, Incorporated” changed the meaning of “state”, “State” and “United States” to mean “District of Columbia Municipal Corporation”.

Like the 1862 change of the meaning of the word “person” to mean “corporation” cited in our affidavit, these special coded meanings of words render a drastically different picture of the world around us.

It turns out that your “personal bank account” is actually a “corporate bank account”.   The “Colorado State Court” is actually the “Colorado District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Court”.

If you are shocked to learn these facts, you are not alone.  So are millions of other Americans.  These changes were made 150 years ago and tucked away in reams of boring meeting minutes and legalistic gobbledygook meant to be applied only to the internal workings of a private governmental services corporation and its employees. 

There was no public announcement, just as there was no public announcement or explanation when Congress created “municipal citizenship” known as “US citizenship” in 1868.  Properly, technically, even to this day, this form of “citizenship” applies only to those born in the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and other Insular States, so there was no real reason to educate the general public about the topic. As Congress was secretively using the labor and the private property assets of these  “citizens” as collateral backing the corporate debts of “The United States of America, Inc.” there was plenty of reason to obscure this development.  At the end of the Civil War it would have been very unpopular to reveal that they were simply changing gears from private sector slave ownership to public sector slave ownership.
You may be surprised to learn that slavery was not abolished by the Thirteenth or any other Amendment to any constitution then or now.   Instead, slavery was redefined as the punishment meted out to criminals. Look it up and read it for yourselves.

For a little hope in a bleak world read these two articles

Two almost completely different scenarios.  The same end.  We Win.

A couple of short stories to bring some ideas forward.

Please comment by clicking the title of this article above, and scrolling down to the comments box.




Saturday, November 28, 2015

7-minute book report with Rich Scheben. "An American Affidavit of Probable Cause"

“You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”


Here is a 7-minute book report audio file with Rich Scheben, about Judge Anna Von Reitzinger’s book “You Know Something Is Wrong When”
I highly recommend this book as a foundational wake-up syllabus for concerned, responsible people.  They’ve been lying to us since the removal of the original 13th amendment.
If not us, WHO?

Friday, November 27, 2015

Sheriff in Hammonds' County needs an education about his duty.

Letter below prepared by a leader in Arizona. It is a clear explanation of the Sheriff's lack of understanding.


Thanks everyone for the quick support you have offered for the Hammonds. The Sheriff has received an overwhelming # of emails already in support of the Hammonds. Many of you emailed the Sheriff recently have received an email clarifying which side of the fence the sheriff is on. It appears he currently stands with the BLM and their unconstitutional jurisdiction of the land.

            The Burns county sheriff's email has brought up many questions in regard to what this fight is all about raising many questions about the Hammonds. From emails we have received from Ammon, it appeared this issue was clear cut and all about Rancher's vs BLM, personal property rights vs agenda 21 & the sustainability movement, states rights vs federal control etc. Then we received this transcript of the court proceedings and it appears to some now that it is not that clear cut. Well, I've read and reread the court proceeding transcript and it is clear to me that Ammon's emails were not misleading.

Link to Sheriff's response letter to Hammond Supporters: http://bundyranch.blogspot.com/

            First let's acknowledge what was said in the court by the prosecutor that greatly effected the jury's decision and influenced many who just read the court proceedings. The concerning accusations brought against the Hammond's in this transcript that most had not heard about include poaching, starting a fire to burn the evidence, and endangering firefighters in the process. That sounds pretty bad. Who would stand behind such hardened criminals? No one. We definitely don't support such actions and would not want to be found supporting those who did such things right? Of course not.

Thursday, November 26, 2015

The Missing 13th Amendment: *No Lawyers Allowed In Public Office*

13th Amendment — Missing

Written by David M. Dodge, Researcher
Date: 08/01/91
In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn, were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.
By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a 13th Amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. Moreover, after studying the Amendment’s language and historical context, they realized the principle
intent of this “missing” 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government. So began a seven year, nationwide search for the truth surrounding the most bizarre Constitutional puzzle in American history — the unlawful removal of a ratified Amendment from the Constitution of the United States.
Since 1983, Dodge and Dunn have uncovered additional copies of the Constitution with the “missing” 13th Amendment printed in at least eighteen separate publications by ten different states and territories over four decades from 1822 to 1860. In June of this year (1991), Dodge uncovered the evidence that this missing 13th Amendment had indeed been lawfully ratified by the state of Virginia and was therefore an authentic Amendment to the American Constitution. If the evidence is correct and no logical errors have been made, a 13th Amendment restricting lawyers from serving in government was ratified in 1819 and removed from the U.S. Constitution during the tumult of the Civil War. Since the Amendment was never lawfully repealed, it is still the Law today. The implications are enormous.
Read this entire article here: 
An excerpt:

"On February 28, 1818, Secretary of State Adams reported the rejection of the Amendment by South Carolina. [House Doc. No. 129]. There are no further entries regarding the ratification of the 13th Amendment in the Journals of Congress; whether Virginia ratified is neither confirmed nor denied. Likewise, a search through the executive papers of Governor Preston of Virginia does not reveal any correspondence from Secretary of State Adams. (However, there is a journal entry in the Virginia House that the Governor presented the House with an official letter and documents from Washington within a time frame that conceivably includes receipt of Adams’ letter.) Again, no evidence of ratification; none of denial.

However, on March 10, 1819, the Virginia legislature passed Act No. 280 (Virginia Archives of Richmond, “misc.’ file, p. 299 for micro-film): “Be it enacted by the General Assembly, that there shall be published an edition of the Laws of this Commonwealth in which shall be contained the following matters, that is to say: the Constitution of the united States and the amendments thereto…” This act was the specific legislated instructions on what was, by law, to be included in the re-publication (a special edition) of the Virginia Civil Code. The Virginia Legislature had already agreed that all Acts were to go into effect on the same day — the day that the Act to re-publish the Civil Code was enacted. Therefore, the 13th Amendment’s official date of ratification would be the date of
re-publication of the Virginia Civil Code: March 12, 1819.

The Delegates knew Virginia was the last of the 13 States that were necessary for the ratification of the 13th Amendment. They also knew there were powerful forces allied against this ratification so they took extraordinary measures to make sure that it was published in sufficient quantity (4,000 copies were ordered, almost triple their usual order), and instructed the printer to send a copy to President James Monroe as well as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. (The printer, Thomas Ritchie, was bonded. He was required to be extremely accurate in his research and his printing, or he would forfeit his bond.)

In this fashion, Virginia announced the ratification: by publication and dissemination of the Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution.  There is question as to whether Virginia ever formally notified the Secretary of State that they had ratified this 13th Amendment. Some have argued that because such notification was not received (or at least, not recorded), the Amendment was therefore not legally ratified. However, printing by a legislature is prima facie evidence of ratification. Further, there is no Constitutional requirement that the Secretary of State, or anyone else, be officially notified to complete the ratification process. The Constitution only requires that three-fourths of the states ratify for an Amendment to be added to the Constitution. If three-quarters of the states ratify, the Amendment is passed. Period. The Constitution is otherwise silent on what procedure should be used to announce, confirm, or
communicate the ratification of amendments.

Knowing they were the last state necessary to ratify the Amendment, the Virginians had every right announce their own and the nation’s ratification of the Amendment by publishing it on a special edition of the Constitution, and so they did.

Word of Virginia’s 1819 ratification spread throughout the States and both Rhode Island and Kentucky published the new Amendment in 1822. Ohio first published in 1824. Maine ordered 10,000 copies of the Constitution with the 13th Amendment to be printed for use in the schools in 1825, and again in 1831 for their Census Edition. Indiana Revised Laws of 1831 published the 13th Article on p. 20. Northwestern Territories published in 1833. Ohio published in 1831 and 1833. Then came the Wisconsin Territory in 1839; Iowa Territory in 1843; Ohio again, in 1848; Kansas Statutes in 1855; and Nebraska Territory six times in a row from 1855 to 1860. So far, David Dodge has identified eleven different states or territories that printed the Amendment in twenty separate publications over forty-one years. And more editions including this 13th Amendment are sure to be discovered. Clearly, Dodge is onto something.

You might be able to convince some of the people, or maybe even all of them, for a little while, that this 13th Amendment was never ratified. Maybe you can show them that the ten legislatures which ordered it published eighteen times we’ve discovered (so far) consisted of ignorant politicians who don’t know their amendments from their… ahh, articles. You might even be able to convince the public that our U.S. forefathers never meant to “outlaw” public servants who pushed people around, accepted bribes or special favors to “look the other way.” Maybe. But before you do, there’s an awful lot of evidence to be explained.

THE AMENDMENT DISAPPEARS

In 1829, the following note appears on p. 23, Vol. 1 of the New York Revised Statutes:

“In the edition of the Laws of the U.S. before referred to, there is an amendment printed as article 13, prohibiting citizens from accepting titles of nobility or honor, or presents, offices, &c. from foreign nations. But, by a message of the president of the United States of the 4th of February, 1818, in answer to a resolution of the house of representatives, it appears that this amendment had been ratified only by 12 states, and therefore had not been adopted. See Vol. IV of the printed papers of the 1st session of the 15th congress, No. 76.” In 1854, a similar note appeared in the Oregon Statutes. Both notes refer to the Laws of the United States, 1st vol. p. 73 (or 74).

It’s not yet clear whether the 13th Amendment was published in Laws of the United States, 1st Vol., prematurely, by accident, in anticipation of Virginia’s ratification, or as part of a plot to discredit the Amendment by making it appear that only twelve States had ratified. Whether the Laws of the United States Vol. 1 (carrying the 13th Amendment) was re-called or made-up is unknown. In fact, it’s not even clear that the specified volume was actually printed — the Law Library of the Library of Congress has no record of its existence.

However, because the noted authors reported no further references to the 13th Amendment after the Presidential letter of February, 1818, they apparently assumed the ratification process had ended in failure at that time. If so, they neglected to seek information on the Amendment after 1818, or at the state level, and therefore missed the evidence of Virginia’s ratification. This opinion — assuming that the Presidential letter of February, 1818, was the last word on the Amendment — has persisted to this day.

In 1849, Virginia decided to revise the 1819 Civil Code of Virginia (which had contained the 13th Amendment for 30 years). It was at that time that one of the code’s revisers (a lawyer named Patton) wrote to the Secretary of the Navy, William B. Preston, asking if this Amendment had been ratified or appeared by mistake. Preston wrote to J. M. Clayton, the Secretary of State, who replied that this Amendment was not ratified by a sufficient number of States. This conclusion was based upon the information that Secretary of State John Quincy Adams had provided the House of Representatives in 1818, before Virginia’s ratification in 1819. (Even today, the Congressional Research Service tells anyone asking about this 13th Amendment this same story: that only twelve states, not the
requisite thirteen, had ratified.)

However, despite Clayton’s opinion, the Amendment continued to be published in various states and territories for at least another eleven years (the last known publication was in the Nebraska territory in 1860). Once again the 13th Amendment was caught in the riptides of American politics. South Carolina seceded from the Union in December of 1860, signaling the onset of the Civil War. In March, 1861, President Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated.

Later in 1861, another proposed amendment, also numbered thirteen, was signed by President Lincoln. This was the only proposed amendment that was ever signed by a president. That resolve to amend read:

“ARTICLE THIRTEEN, No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

In other words, President Lincoln had signed a resolve that would have permitted slavery, and upheld states’ rights. Only one State, Illinois, ratified this proposed amendment before the Civil War broke out in 1861. In the tumult of 1865, the original 13th Amendment was finally removed from the US Constitution. On January 31, another 13th Amendment (which prohibited slavery in Sect. 1, and ended states’ rights in Sect. 2) was proposed. On April 9, the Civil War ended with General Lee’s surrender. On April 14, President Lincoln (who, in 1861, had signed the proposed Amendment that would have allowed slavery and states rights) was assassinated. On December 6, the “new” 13th Amendment loudly prohibiting slavery (and quietly surrendering states rights to the federal government) was ratified, replacing and effectively erasing the original 13th Amendment that had prohibited “titles of nobility” and “honors”.

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Bigger Than Bundy: Militia put on Level 2 Alert

to Defend Oregon Ranchers against Tyrannical Feds Who Label Them Terrorists.

Posted on  by Tim Brown



This story has been brewing for some time, but not received much national attention, unlike the Bundy Ranch incident in 2014. The family of Dwight Hammond have come under the tyrannical eye of the federal government and now it appears that both Hammond and his son Steve are being railroaded for something that is a non-criminal act is being played out before their eyes. Word went out to citizen militias this week that theissue is a level 2 alert, meaning that militia members across the country need to be ready to deploy to Oregon to stand against federal tyrants who are seeking to wrongfully imprison two American citizens.
According to an October 7, 2015 press release from the Obama Department of Justice, Dwight Lincoln Hammond, Jr., 73, and his son, Steven Dwight Hammond, 46, both residents of Diamond, Oregon in Harney County, were sentenced to five years in prison by Chief U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken for arsons they committed on federal lands.
The men were charged nearly a decade after the first fire and five years after the second.
Read the entire article on the DC Clothesline here:
Please contact these representatives to help the Hammonds right now, we cannot wait.

State Representative Cliff Bentz (R)
900 Court St NE H-475
Salem, OR 97310
Phone: (503) 986-1460
Email: rep.cliffbentz@state.or.us

State Senator Ted Ferrioli (R)
900 Court St NE S-323
Salem, OR 97310
Phone: (503) 986-1730
Email: sen.teferrioli@state.or.us


Thank you,

Ammon bundy

Bundy Ranch uploaded a new video: Federal Threats (Hammonds).

The Hammonds family has been threatened, they are in fear for their lives. (Please watch and be prepared to stand for this good family who has been through so much.)

Jason Van Tatenhove and Stewart Rhodes on the Common Sense Show Today

In his usual no-nonsense style, Stewart Rhodes outlined the most critical issues that we face as a nation along with his solutions to solve said issues. Let me give a hint: Part of it involves you prying your cheeks off the couch and making a plan. This is one interview that you do not want to miss.





Found here:  http://redlistnews.com/stewart-rhodes-on-talk-network/

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Rich Scheben of Off Grid Montana about Anna Von Reitz on the John Moore show.

On the John Moore radio show on the Republic Broadcasting Network  on Monday Nov. 23rd

Rich Scheben from offgridmontana.com talks about the solutions from Anna Von Reitz.  These ideas are gaining ground all around the country right now.

This one show reaches about a half million listeners, and Rich has been talking about Anna on about 2 or 3 shows per week lately.

Please listen and make up your own mind. Click the blue button.

  58.11 in length and well worth your time.

Here is a seven minute plug for the Book from Anna Von Reitz.

https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/annas-audio-book-report.mp3?_=1

When has the corporate monster calling itself our "government" not been at war?

The Headlines are that Turkey shot down a Russian Plane - So What?

These elitist demons have always wanted their death cult of war to be waged.
When are the Americans going to wake up and realize that our lawful government has been HIJACKED by an international criminal cabal operating a mostly foreign owned for profit criminal enterprise corporation masquerading as our federal government, that is using our military as cannon fodder in a world wide war for their power and profit?
When are American's going to realize who they really are, and who they were intended to be by the founders;  that is the Kings and Queens of America.
When are we all going to band together to protect the people who are laying an axe to the root of the evil tree of tyranny?
When are the Sheriffs going to wake up and start serving the people who directly elected them to protect their rights under God and guaranteed by the Constitution for the united States of America?
Until we all get up to speed on this, there will be NO PEACE, and there will be no solutions.
Paul Stramer


Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:56 AM
Subject: [CitizensNewswire] WWIII comes ever nearer

Not only did Turkey shoot down a Russian plane, they murdered the pilots as they parachuted to ground, an unnecessary act that seems designed to inflame the situation. The U.S. has indeed gone to war by proxy.

Putin: Downing of Russian jet over Syria stab in the back by terrorist accomplices
https://www.rt.com/news/323262-putin-downing-plane-syria/


Regards,
Kirk

Supreme Court decisions on Individual Sovereignty

HERE ARE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT CASES THAT PROVE YOU ARE SOVEREIGN, AND DON'T HAVE TO OBEY YOUR HIRED PUBLIC SERVANTS OR THEIR WRITTEN LEGISLATION (Unless you consent, or infringe on the equal rights of another)... [All verified sources, definite facts]...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) To prove you ARE 'sovereign'... "at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects... and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty." Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793), U.S. Supreme Court.
[Verified Source:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/2/419/case.html ]
2) "No one, we believe, has ever doubted the proposition, that, according to the institutions of this country, the sovereignty in every State resides in the people of the State, and that they may alter and change their form of government at their own pleasure." Luther v. Borden 48 U.S. 1 (1849), U.S. Supreme Court. [Verified Source:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/48/1/case.html ]
2) What 'sovereign' means... "The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign,are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. Through the medium of their Legislature they may exercise all the powers which previous to the Revolution could have been exercised either by the King alone, or by him in conjunction with his Parliament; subject only to those restrictions which have been imposed by the Constitution of this State or of the U.S." Lansing v. Smith, 21 D. 89., 4 Wendel 9, 1829, New York Court of Appeals. [Verified sources: WestLaw at ASU Law Library:www.facebook.com/groups/FreedomFilesGroup/921073277915255/ ; https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/sovreign.htm ]

PROOF - Sandy Hook Was a Staged Media Hoax -- Anderson Cooper Knows



Found here:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7dnJFq7lJU&sns=em

Wolfgang Halbig ~ Sandy Hook Staged Government Community Capstone Exercise False Flag
This guy trains schools and law enforcement, and is ex law enforcement himself.


Found here:  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3QTCh3BLNE&sns=em


Sunday, November 22, 2015

An Open Letter to Sheriff Ward of Harney County Oregon-

and to All County Sheriffs in America from Judge Anna

Dear Sheriff Ward, 

I am writing to you today to ascertain your office and position with respect to the Hammonds and the developing situation at the Bundy Ranch with respect to "Federal Officers". 

My name is Anna Maria Riezinger, also known as Anna von Reitz because my actual name is German and a mile long.  I am an American Common Law Superior Court Judge in Alaska where operation of the Seventh Amendment Courts started up again in conjunction with the Common Law Grand Juries more than a year ago and I also serve as a Federal Postal District Court Judge for the Western Region. 

As you can clearly see by reading the Seventh Amendment all matters pertaining to living people and their property must be addressed to Common Law Courts.  How then, are the Hammonds being addressed by federal admiralty courts? 

The answer lies in the past.  

During the Civil War the normal court system owed the people in the South shut down and did not immediately reopen. Commanders in the military districts in ten states appointed civilian tribunals to function under "Special Admiralty"----- a euphemism.  For the purposes of these military tribunals, people and property could be addressed in an arbitrary fashion without regard for the Law of the Land.  This was very convenient for the administrators and very unfortunate for the people.

Hammond Physically Threatened by Federal Agents for Speaking Out

Usually there is more to a story. At these links you will find the letter from the Sheriff, and a court transcript of the re-sentencing hearing in the Hammond case.
You will see that the sheriff is completely sucked in to the BAR corporate tribunal and is doing their bidding, thinking that he is doing the right thing.
In any case, the system needs to be scrapped and we need a return to a Republic. The corporations need to go. See this document for some solutions.
End comment from Paul Stramer

The following is from Ammon Bundy.

Read this and weep!  It’s a problem that won’t go away. It’s almost impossible to imagine! Thanks to all of you who have forwarded this message. George.

Hammond Family Physically Threatened by Federal Agents for Speaking Out

Dear Friends,

Yesterday I received a phone call from Dwight Hammond (74). He said that he was very afraid for his life and for mine as well. 

He informed me that federal agents contacted his attorney. They told Dwight's attorney that if Dwight and Susie did not end all communication with Ammon Bundy, that they "would detain the Hammond's early for federal prison and that they would transfer pain to the Hammond family". 

He further said, that he believed "they would bring misery to the whole family".

Steven Hammond's attorney also confirmed that federal agents contacted him and hinted a raid on the Hammonds home if they did not end all communication with Ammon Bundy.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Who makes the best fighters against terrorism?

Tony Rose
I am over 60 and the Armed Forces thinks I'm too old to track down terrorists. You can't be older than 42 to join the military. They've got the whole thing backwards.

Instead of sending 18-year olds off to fight, they ought to take us old guys. You shouldn't be able to join a military unit until you're at least 35.

For starters, researchers say 18-year-olds think about sex every ten seconds. Old guys only think about sex a couple of times a month, leaving us more than 280,000 additional seconds per day to concentrate on the enemy.

Young guys haven't lived long enough to be cranky, and a cranky soldier is a dangerous soldier. 'My back hurts! I can't sleep, I'm tired and hungry.' Were bad-tempered and impatient, and maybe letting us kill some ***hole that desperately deserves it will make us feel better and shut us up for a while.....

An 18-year-old doesn't even like to get up before 10am. Old guys always get up early to pee, so what the hell. Besides, like I said, I'm tired and can't sleep and since I'm already up, I may as well be up killing some fanatical son-of-a-bitch.

Monday, November 16, 2015

What is a Cestui Que Vie Trust?

In order that you don't think Anna and others are making this up.
Here is the definition of a Cestui Que Vie Trust
Canon 2036 (link)
A Cestui Que Vie Trust, also known by several other pseudonyms such as “Term of Life or Years” or “Pur Autre Vie” or "Fide Commissary Trust" or “Foreign Situs Trust” or “Secret Trust” is a pseudo form of trust first formed in the 16th Century under Henry VIII of England on one or more presumptions including (but not limited to) one or more Persons presumed wards, infants, idiots, lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed/presumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions by which such a Trust may be “legally” formed were added in later statutes to include bankruptcy, incapacity, mortgages and private companies.

Found here:   http://one-heaven.org/canons/positive_law/article/100.html

This is not from a website I subscribe to or have looked at beyond this one definition.

This is NOT a lawful trust, but an invention of the lawyers during the time of King Henry VIII. You won't find it in the official Code of Canon Law of the Catholic Church. At least I couldn't find it on several sites including the Vatican website.

Paul

See over 100 others on Anna's website here:  www.annavonreitz.com

Deputies Execute Popular Rancher in Idaho



Found here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NypPTMdOuD4&feature=youtu.be

Published on Nov 13, 2015
The story is still unfolding regarding what now seems to be an execution of a rancher by sheriff deputies. His wife claims that the deputies then abused her and refused to call 911 as her husband bled-out in the street.

The Terror Mill Propaganda Machine is Running Again



Found here:  http://philsreport.blogspot.com/2015/11/rt-just-destroyed-fake-news-on-paris.html

I thought you might like to see some coverage from paris on RT.

See more Paris footage here:
http://www.abeldanger.net/2015/11/psyop-in-paris-bombingshooting-hoax-je.html#comment-form

Big jump in visitors to Anna's website

The weekly totals nearly doubled this week.

Weekly Stats Report: 9 Nov - 15 Nov 2015
Project: Annavonreitz.com
URL: http://www.annavonreitz.com

Summary


  Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun Total Avg
Pageloads 207 174 323 430 372 210 344 2,060 294
Unique Visits 131 139 185 329 291 169 284 1,528 218
First Time Visits 83 76 114 242 196 102 195 1,008 144
Returning Visits 48 63 71 87 95 67 89 520 74

Saturday, November 14, 2015

Judge Anna on Second Amendment

Anna von Reitz


Over the past month or so I have been demonized as a lot of things, but the strangest accusation of them all is that I am against the Second Amendment.
Let's get this straight--- as far as I read it, The Constitution not only guarantees the right of Americans to keep and bear arms, it infers the responsibility to do so. "Federal United States Citizens" are not afforded any such rights or responsibilities, since "Congress" acting as the plenary oligarchy in charge of the District of Columbia rules their lives, but for Americans, it's different.
I believe that those who DON'T keep and bear arms and who DON'T step up to the responsibility to defend themselves, their neighbors, and their country, are avoiding their duty. Clearly, the shooters in this most recent violence in Paris yesterday stood around for long periods of time, just shooting innocent people, reloading, shooting some more.... if the majority of people in that theater had had guns and fired back, none of that would have been possible. The would-be shooters would have been blasted to where they were going anyway, and a lot of lives would have been saved.
We, Americans, had to carry guns in the Wild West, and it is coming back to that. There is no way for the police to be everywhere, all the time. We have to be responsible for our own safety, and as much as possible, the safety of others around us. My response is to sign myself and my family up for a refresher Gun Safety and Home Security Course, thank you, very much.

An Open Letter to General Dunford and the Joint Chiefs of Staff

by Anna Von Reitz


November 12, 2015
The Joint Chiefs of Staff
General Dunford, Chief of Staff
9999 Joint Staff
Pentagon
Washington, DC 20318-9999
Dear General Dunford and Members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:
Today, it is our sad duty to reiterate the facts. Our nation has been all but overrun by British-backed inland pirates making “war” upon innocent civilian non-combatants who are owed the Good Faith and Service of both the British Monarch who is supposed to act as our Trustee on the “High Seas and Inland Waterways” and the City-State of Westminster aka Inner City of London, which promised us “amity in perpetuity” under the Treaty of Westminster 1794.
These Breaches of Trust and Treaty by declared “friends and allies” and the criminality involved in their secretive execution of agreements revealed by the Secret Treaty of Verona (1845) led to the issuance of private privateer’s “licenses” to Bar Association Members including Members of the American Bar Association.
It should also be clear that the resulting theft of our resources and labor and the abuse of our Armed Forces has occurred on the watch of your predecessors, all of whom have taken their paychecks from our treasury while turning a blind eye to the corruption in which they have participated and benefitted from.
The jig, Sirs, is up.
Your duty is clearly to the American People and failure to perform will not be excused.