Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Claim Your Name and Estate -- the EZ Way


By Anna Von Reitz

Imagine the situation -- 

You are the heir of a vast fortune, but suddenly, you "disappear".  

(For the moment, we won't delve into how.) 

Your British Cousin, Bubba, says to himself --- "What ho!  No sense in letting all this property sit idle!  I have the keys to the boathouse and the mansion and cars and everything, so I will just move in and make myself at home in Cousin Joe's absence." 

So he does.  He settles his ample rump in your armchair, props his feet in front of your fire, and begins directing all sorts of business operations using your assets as collateral for his enterprises.  

He rents out your boat for ferrying and boat rides and sightseeing and makes a killing.  He buys another boat using your credit, and expands upon this business. The money is rolling in.  

He does the same thing with the mansion -- turns it into a B and B, rakes in the dough, then uses it as collateral for a loan to start a hotel chain.  Things are going great guns.

Judge Anna von Reitz on the Radio



Published on Mar 16, 2016
What all American Nationals need to know to reclaim the Law of the Land and re-inhabit government by the People. Common Law Judge, Anna von Reitz on Resurrect The Republic - Dirty Uncle Sam.

Found Here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUutVcsKK3A


So-Called Republic of North America


By Anna Von Reitz

Anyone who believes any bull put out by anyone called "Rautshild" --- which means "Rotten Shield" needs their heads examined.  

These criminals have been preying upon us for 150 years and they think that they are so smart and we are so stupid that they are going to be able to make false claims of "abandonment"---- saying that we "abandoned" or "gifted" or "donated" our assets to these criminals---- and come in here and displace us as the Paramount Security Interest Holders and Priority Creditors of virtually every incorporated entity on this planet INCLUDING all their banks.  

Alaska and Hawaii like all the "states" supposedly added to the Union after 1860 are not actually states, but states-in-waiting because there hasn't been a sitting Continental (land jurisdiction) Congress since then to enroll them.  But they do have contracts known as "Statehood Compacts" which are legally binding Treaties ultimately signed off on by the British Monarchs.  

This means that while none of these Western States are actually part of the land jurisdiction Union, they are nonetheless owed all the same rights and guarantees.
  
And as the actual Constitution was not vacated as the perpetrators of these crimes anticipated--- because we got busy and issued new Sovereign Letters Patent and forged agreements with new "federal" partners---- these pretenders are all "Secondary Creditors" and SOL (Shit Out of Luck for those younger than 40). 

No "Republic of North America" and no more Commercial Feudalism.  

End Game.  Checkmate.  

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

Contracts and Liability - Part of the Answer to the Fraud



Found here:  https://inpowermovement.com/

Monday, August 28, 2017

URGENT FRAUD WARNING! USE BUYER'S REMORSE CLAUSE NOW!


By Anna Von Reitz

Rothschild is dumping "US" assets this morning because he realizes that the titles he claims to own to all these assets are based on fraud -- worthless -- but he is trying to sell them anyway.  I have never seen a more flagrant example of Bad Faith since the Florida Real Estate Swindles.

The banks have been involved in a multi-generational fraud scheme in which they have created, bought and sold interests in property in which they have no valid interest. 

Pure and simple -- they don't have a valid interest in anything they are selling. They are selling the equivalents to Quit Claims to property they don't own.  Those "US" assets belong to and have been claimed back by the American States and People.  All Secondary Creditors including the Rothschilds are out of luck. 

Sunday, August 27, 2017

WARNING – Do NOT Participate in Any “Free Speech” Rallies or Protests!


by IWB (Investment Watch Blog) · August 26, 2017

The media and George Soros are all in on starting a civil war, or widespread civil unrest. The rallies are scheduled and set up by fake right wing activists, then paid Antifa protesters are sent in to start fights. Soros pays both sides. They are then joined by fools who think the whole thing is real.

The goal isn’t to remove a statue or protect free speech. The goal is violence. The goal is to destroy the fabric of our society. They don’t care if it’s about monuments or free speech, all they care about is destroying the constitution.

If civil war, or widespread violent unrest breaks out:

A Reply to Concerns


By Anna Von Reitz

Trump would have been forced to leave office when the Municipal United States quits operations for lack of insurance and capital. 

Many senior officers of that government haven't been paid since February.  They have continued to come to work as volunteers. 

Let that sink in. 

But it obviously can't continue like that forever. 

So the struggling Territorial Government will attempt to take on the employees and the other functions during "reorganization", but during this "reorganization" it will not be in control.  As things stand, Trustees appointed by Secondary Creditors--- international banks---- will be in control. 

That leaves the American states and people at the mercy of foreign creditors of the old federal corporations that mismanaged everything into this situation.

INSTRUCTION ON THE TWELFTH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST

Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's Year

The Introit of the Mass is the prayer of a troubled soul, entreating God for assistance against its enemies:
INTROIT Incline unto my aid, O God: O Lord, make haste to help me: let my enemies be confounded and ashamed, who seek my soul. Let them be turned backward and blush for shame, who desire evils to me. (Ps. LXIX) Glory etc.
COLLECT Almighty and merciful God, of whose gift it cometh that the faithful do Thee homage with due and laudable service: grant, we beseech Thee, that we may run without stumbling to the attainment of Thy promises. Through etc.
EPISTLE (II Cor. III. 4-9.) Brethren, such confidence we have through Christ towards God: not that we are sufficient to think any thing of ourselves, as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is from God, who also hath made us fit ministers of the New Testament, not in the letter, but in the spirit: for the letter killeth: but the spirit quickeneth. Now if the ministration of death, engraven with letters upon stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not steadfastly behold the face of Moses, for the glory of his countenance, which is made void: how shall not the ministration of the Spirit be rather in glory? For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more the ministration of justice aboundeth in glory.
EXPLANATION St. Paul speaks in the epistle, from which this extract is taken, of the conversion of the Corinthians, which he accomplished not by his own ability, but with the help of God, who made him a minister of the New Testament, a teacher of the true religion of Christ. The New Testament by the grace of the Holy Ghost recalls the sinner from the death of sin, reconciles him to God, and thus enlivens and makes him pleasing to God; whereas the letter of the Old Law, which contains more eternal ceremonies and fewer commandments, changes not the man, but rather destroys him, that is, threatens with death the transgressor of the law instead of freeing him from sin and reconciling him to God, thus permitting him to die the eternal death. St. Paul preached the true religion of Christ, which vivifies, justifies, and sanctifies man. If the ministry of Moses was so glorified by God, that his countenance shone, when he returned from Mount Sinai, where God gave him the law, how much more dignified and glorious must be the ministry of the New Law. Learn from this to esteem the office of preaching, and be humble like St. Paul, who trusted not in himself but in God, to whom he ascribed all honor.

Psst...... What the Corporations Don't Know


By Anna Von Reitz

This is on the QT, faithful readers.  This is something hidden from those who consider themselves wise and powerful, but unless some of them wake up, it is going to uproot their worldview.  

People incorporate businesses for various reasons -- purported tax advantages (churches and non-profits) and limited liability and bankruptcy protection (commercial corporations) are the typical reasons for incorporating. 

Most businesses that incorporate see no benefit from incorporation, and they suffer many, many disadvantages, but they have been advised by legal professionals to incorporate----and so they do.  

Let's see what they lose by incorporating:  

Saturday, August 26, 2017

Thought for the Day from Anna Von Reitz

Until rank and file Americans understand what has happened and restore their unincorporated county governments, there's nobody being paid to enforce the Public Law, including the actual Constitution.

Additional Facts About Re-Venue:


By Anna Von Reitz

Everything that is happening is allowed by the actual Constitution.
Granted, there have been abundant acts of fraud and breaches of trust, and counterfeiting and everything else, but, in re-venuing the government and choosing new "federal" service providers, we are all well-within our rights as the actual sovereigns of the land jurisdiction owed to this country.
It is also crucial for people to understand that as a result of mismanagement and crooked bookkeeping the "US citizens" and "United States Citizens" are stuck with an insurmountable load of odious debt. This means that the corporations representing both the Municipal United States and the Territorial United States have been forced into bankruptcy --- the Municipal United States is being liquidated under Chapter 7 and the Territorial United States is being reorganized under Chapter 11.
That is, they are in receivership to foreign bankruptcy Trustees chosen by Secondary Creditors ---- banks.

Urgent Message for Donald Trump


By Anna Von Reitz

This is an urgent message for US President Donald J. Trump: 

Help is on the way.  

What appears to be an insurmountable obstacle will melt away like morning mist. 

You have been chosen to enter the vacated Office of President of the United States of America (Unincorporated).  We have seen your heart in your actions and we approve of the steps you have taken to get the Ship of State back on course.  

The so-called "New Republic" does not have a contract.  Mr. Rothschild has been repeatedly rebuffed and informed that we have made new arrangements and have new contracts with new federal service providers in place following the attempt to vacate the federal obligations and commercial service contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America.  

Legal Kung-Fu


By Anna Von Reitz

Tonight a friend (thank you, Rene) reminded me of a true gem, another one of those people like Brent Winters and Jean Keating who have a great wealth of insight and information to offer about the law: Richard Cornforth, yes, "corn" as in the vegetable, and "forth" as in "going forth": Cornforth.  Remember that name. 

Of course, it is my hope and determination to see the restoration of American Common Law Courts, which the people of this country are owed.  But in the meantime, we must gird for legal battle on foreign turf.  Too many Americans have been railroaded and misrepresented by members of the Bar. 

For those sincerely seeking a solid understanding of the various kinds of law including the American Common Law we are heir to, I recommend Brent Winter's astonishingly wonderful book, The Excellence of the Common Law, available on Amazon.  It is neither brief nor is it a quick read, as it does justice to the subject and gives you both meat and potatoes, and it is not inexpensive, either.  

Friday, August 25, 2017

Monsters 2.0


By Anna Von Reitz

I know that this video is making the rounds and that many Americans are in shock as they realize how badly the Bundys and others have been treated by their public employees, yet it is a fitting follow-up to the video I shared with everyone last night that chronicles the history of the Native Americans and particularly the Lakota people who now live on Pine Ridge Reservation.  

It shows you in no uncertain terms the kind of brutality and ignorance that has become commonplace among federal government employees, and especially within the subcontracting organizations known as agencies: BLM, FBI, FEMA, BATF, NSA, DHS, IRS, and the list goes on.  

Never forget when viewing this video that even worse things ultimately happened as a result of this "stand off".  LaVoy Finicum, an innocent Rancher on his way to a public assembly, was deliberately ambushed by paramilitary mercenary goons acting under color of law -- and murdered in cold blood.  His family escaped only by the hand and grace of God.  

The Bundys themselves have been repeatedly, unjustifiably railroaded into foreign courts and tried under foreign law under the false presumption provided by deliberately falsified public records misidentifying them as "US citizens".  This is a war crime of genocide that has been practiced against the American states and people by commercial corporations merely calling themselves the UNITED STATES, INC., the USA, Inc., the STATE OF NEVADA, and the State of Oregon. 

In Defense of Lee And Jackson, August 24, 2017

See some Clarifications below Chuck Baldwin's article by Anna Von Reitz.

In Defense of Lee And Jackson

By Chuck Baldwin
August 24, 2017


Ever since the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, took place, memorials and statues of the great men of the Confederacy--along with the flags of the Confederacy--are being vandalized or taken down by municipal governments.
In 1864, Confederate General Patrick Cleburne warned his fellow Southerners of the historical consequences should the South lose their war for independence. He said if the South lost, “It means the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy; that our youth will be trained by Northern schoolteachers; will learn from Northern school books their version of the war; will be impressed by the influences of history and education to regard our gallant dead as traitors, and our maimed veterans as fit objects for derision.” No truer words were ever spoken.
History revisionists flooded America’s public schools with Northern propaganda about the people who attempted to secede from the United States, characterizing them as racists, extremists, radicals, hatemongers, and traitors.
Folks, please understand that the only people in 1861 who believed that states did not have the right to secede were Abraham Lincoln and his radical Republicans. To say that Southern states did not have the right to secede from the United States is to say that the thirteen colonies did not have the right to secede from Great Britain. One cannot be right and the other wrong. If one is right, both are right. If one is wrong, both are wrong. How can we celebrate the Declaration of Independence of the American colonies in 1776 and then turn around and condemn the Declaration of Independence of the Confederacy in 1861?
In fact, Southern states were not the only states that talked about secession. After the Southern states seceded, the State of Maryland fully intended to join them. In September of 1861, Lincoln sent federal troops to the State capital and seized the legislature by force in order to prevent them from voting. Federal provost marshals stood guard at the polls and arrested Democrats and anyone else who believed in secession. A special furlough was granted to Maryland troops so they could go home and vote against secession. Judges who tried to inquire into the phony elections were arrested and thrown into military prisons. There is your great “emancipator,” folks.
In fact, before the South seceded, several Northern states had threatened secession. Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island had threatened secession as far back as James Madison’s administration. In addition, the states of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware were threatening secession during the first half of the nineteenth century--long before the Southern states even considered such a thing.
People say constantly that Lincoln “saved” the Union. Lincoln didn’t save the Union; he subjugated the Union. There is a huge difference. A union that is not voluntary is not a union. Does a man have a right to force a woman to marry him or to force a woman to stay married to him? In the eyes of God, a union of husband and wife is far more sacred than a union of states. If God recognizes the right of husbands and wives to separate (and He does), to try and suggest that states do not have the right to lawfully separate (under Natural and divine right) is the most preposterous proposition possible.
People also say that Lincoln freed the slaves. Lincoln did not free a single slave. But what he did do was enslave free men. His so-called Emancipation Proclamation had no authority in the Southern states, as they had separated into another country. Lincoln had no more authority to issue a proclamation in the CSA than the British Crown has authority to issue a proclamation in the states of the USA today.
Do you not find it interesting that Lincoln’s proclamation didn't free a single slave in the United States, the country in which he DID have authority? That’s right. The Emancipation Proclamation deliberately ignored slavery in the North. Do you not realize that when Lincoln signed his proclamation, there were over 300,000 slaveholders who were fighting in the Union army? (Source: Mildred Lewis Rutherford, “Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederate States, and Abraham Lincoln, the President of the United States,” 1861-1865, p. 35)
The institution of slavery did not end until the 13th Amendment was ratified on December 6, 1865.
Speaking of the 13th Amendment, did you know that, in his first inaugural address, Lincoln actually SUPPORTED an amendment to the U.S. Constitution (which would have been the 13th Amendment) proposed by Ohio Congressman Thomas Corwin that said: “No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by laws of said State.”
You read it right. Lincoln supported an amendment to the U.S. Constitution PRESERVING the institution of slavery. This proposed amendment was written in March of 1861, a month BEFORE the shots were fired at Fort Sumter, South Carolina.
The State of South Carolina was particularly incensed at the tariffs enacted in 1828 and 1832. The Tariff of 1828 was disdainfully called “The Tariff of Abominations” by the State of South Carolina. Accordingly, the South Carolina legislature declared that the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were “unauthorized by the constitution of the United States.”
Think, folks: Why would the Southern states secede from the Union over slavery when President Abraham Lincoln had offered an amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing the PRESERVATION of slavery? That makes no sense. If the issue was predominantly slavery, all the South needed to do was to go along with Lincoln, and his proposed 13th Amendment would have permanently preserved slavery among the Southern (and Northern) states. Does that sound like a body of people who were willing to lose hundreds of thousands of men on the battlefield over saving slavery--especially considering that the vast majority of Southerners did not own a single slave? What nonsense!
The problem was, Lincoln wanted the Southern states to pay the Union a 40% tariff on their exports. The South considered this outrageous and refused to pay. By the time hostilities broke out in 1861, the South was paying up to, and perhaps exceeding, 70% of the nation’s taxes. Before the war, the South was very prosperous and productive. And Washington, D.C., kept raising the taxes and tariffs on them. You know, the way Washington, D.C., keeps raising the taxes on prosperous American citizens today.
This is much the same story as the way the colonies refused to pay the demanded tariffs of the British Crown--albeit the tariffs of the Crown were much LOWER than those demanded by Lincoln. Lincoln’s proposed 13th Amendment was an attempt to entice the South into paying the tariffs by being willing to permanently ensconce the institution of slavery into the Constitution. AND THE SOUTH SAID NO!
In addition, the Congressional Record of the United States forever obliterates the notion that the North fought the War Between The States over slavery. Read it for yourself. This resolution was passed unanimously in the U.S. Congress on July 23, 1861: “The War is waged by the government of the United States, not in the spirit of conquest or subjugation, nor for the purpose of overthrowing or interfering with the rights or institutions of the states, but to defend and protect the Union.”
What could be clearer? The U.S. Congress declared that the war against the South was NOT an attempt to overthrow or interfere with the “institutions” of the states, but to keep the Union intact--BY FORCE. The “institutions” implied most certainly included the institution of slavery.
Hear it loudly and clearly: Lincoln’s war against the South had NOTHING to do with ending slavery--so said the U.S. Congress by unanimous resolution in 1861.
Abraham Lincoln himself said it was NEVER his intention to end the institution of slavery. In a letter to Alexander Stevens (who later became the Vice President of the Confederacy), Lincoln wrote this, “Do the people of the South really entertain fears that a Republican administration would, directly, or indirectly, interfere with their slaves, or with them, about their slaves? If they do, I wish to assure you, as once a friend, and still, I hope, not an enemy, that there is no cause for such fears. The South would be in no more danger in this respect than it was in the days of Washington.”
Again, what could be clearer? Lincoln himself said the Southern states had nothing to fear from him in regard to abolishing slavery.
Hear Lincoln again: “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it.” He also said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so and I have no inclination to do so.”
The idea that the Confederate flag (actually there were five of them) stood for racism, bigotry, hatred, and slavery is just so much hogwash. In fact, if one truly wants to discover who the racist was in 1861, just read the words of Mr. Lincoln.
On August 14, 1862, Abraham Lincoln invited a group of black people to the White House. In his address to them, he told them of his plans to colonize them all back to Africa. Listen to what he told these folks: “Why should the people of your race be colonized and where? Why should they leave this country? This is, perhaps, the first question for proper consideration. You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss; but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think. Your race suffer very greatly, many of them, by living among us, while ours suffers from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason, at least, why we should be separated. You here are freemen, I suppose? Perhaps you have been long free, or all your lives. Your race is suffering, in my judgment, the greatest wrong inflicted on any people. But even when you cease to be slaves, you are yet far removed from being placed on an equality with the white race. . . . The aspiration of men is to enjoy equality with the best when free, but on this broad continent not a single man of your race is made the equal of a single man of ours.”
Did you hear what Lincoln said? He said that black people would NEVER be equal with white people--even if they all obtained their freedom from slavery. If that isn’t a racist statement, I’ve never heard one.
Lincoln’s statement above is not isolated. In Charleston, Illinois, in 1858, Lincoln said in a speech, “I am not, nor have ever been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
Ladies and gentlemen, in his own words, Abraham Lincoln declared himself to be a white supremacist. Why don’t our history books and news media tell the American people the truth about Lincoln and about The War Between The States?
It’s simple: if people would study the meanings and history of the flag, symbols, and statues of the Confederacy and the Confederate leaders, they might begin to awaken to the tyrannical policies of Washington, D.C., that triggered Southern independence--policies that have only escalated since the defeat of the Confederacy--and they might have a notion to again resist.
By the time Lincoln penned his Emancipation Proclamation, the war had been going on for two years without resolution. In fact, the North was losing the war. Even though the South was outmanned and out-equipped, the genius of the Southern generals and fighting acumen of the Southern men had put the Northern armies on their heels. Many people in the North never saw the legitimacy of Lincoln’s war in the first place, and many of them actively campaigned against it. These people were affectionately called “Copperheads” by people in the South.
Here’s another thing: the war fought from 1861 to 1865 was NOT a “Civil War.” Civil war suggests two sides fighting for control of the same capital and country. The South didn’t want to take over Washington, D.C., any more than their forebears wanted to take over London. They wanted to separate from Washington, D.C., just as America’s Founding Fathers wanted to separate from Great Britain. The proper name for that war is either “The War Between The States” or “The War Of Southern Independence” or, more fittingly, “The War Of Northern Aggression.”
Had the South wanted to take over Washington, D.C., they could have done so with the very first battle of the “Civil War.” When Lincoln ordered federal troops to invade Virginia in the First Battle of Manassas (called the “First Battle of Bull Run” by the North), Confederate troops sent the Yankees running for their lives all the way back to Washington. Had the Confederates pursued them, they could have easily taken the city of Washington, D.C., seized Abraham Lincoln, and in all likelihood ended the war before it really began. But General Beauregard and the other leaders of the Confederacy had no intention of fighting an aggressive war against the North. They merely wanted to defend the South against Lincoln’s aggression.
In order to rally people in the North, Lincoln needed a moral crusade. That’s what his Emancipation Proclamation was all about. This explains why his proclamation was not penned until 1863, after two years of fruitless fighting. He was counting on people in the North to stop resisting his war against the South if they thought it was some kind of “holy” war. Plus, Lincoln was hoping that his proclamation would incite blacks in the South to insurrect against Southern whites. If thousands of blacks would begin to wage war against their white neighbors, the fighting men of the Southern armies would have to leave the battlefields and go home to defend their families. This never happened.
Not only did blacks not riot against the whites of the South, but many black men volunteered to fight alongside their white friends and neighbors in the Confederate army. Unlike the blacks in the North, who were conscripted by Lincoln and forced to fight in segregated units, thousands of blacks in the South fought of their own free will in a fully integrated Southern army. I bet your history book never told you that.
The slave trade had ended in 1808 per the U.S. Constitution, and the practice of slavery was quickly dying too. It would have died a peaceful death in a few short years, just as it had in Great Britain. It didn’t take a national war and the deaths of over a half million men to end slavery in England. America’s so-called Civil War was absolutely unnecessary. The greed of Lincoln’s radical Republicans in the North combined with the cold, calloused heart of Lincoln himself are responsible for the tragedy of the “Civil War.”
By the time Lincoln launched his war against the Southern states, the entire country, including the South, recognized the moral evil of slavery and wanted it to end. Only a very small fraction of Southerners even owned slaves, and the vast majority of Southern leaders, including Robert E. Lee and “Stonewall” Jackson, openly supported abolishing slavery.
Speaking of Lee and Jackson, without question, these two were two of the greatest military leaders of all time. Even more, many military historians regard the Lee and Jackson tandem as perhaps the greatest battlefield duo in the history of warfare. If Jackson had survived the battle of Chancellorsville, it is very possible that the South would have prevailed at Gettysburg and perhaps would have even won the War Between the States.
In fact, it was Lord Roberts, commander-in-chief of the British armies in the early twentieth century, who said, “In my opinion, Stonewall Jackson was one of the greatest natural military geniuses the world ever saw. I will go even further than that--as a campaigner in the field, he never had a superior. In some respects, I doubt whether he ever had an equal.”
Furthermore, Robert E. Lee and Thomas J. Jackson were two of the finest Christian gentlemen and two of the most noble and honorable men--Christian or otherwise--this country has ever produced. Both their character and their conduct were beyond reproach.
It is well established that Jackson regularly conducted a Sunday School class for black children. This was a ministry he took very seriously. As a result, he was dearly loved and appreciated by these children and their parents.
In addition, both Jackson and Lee emphatically supported the abolition of slavery. In fact, Lee called slavery “a moral and political evil.” He also said “the best men in the South” opposed it and welcomed its demise. Jackson said he wished to see “the shackles struck from every slave.”
To think that Lee and Jackson (and the vast majority of Confederate soldiers) would fight and die to preserve an institution they considered evil and abhorrent--and that they were already working to dismantle--is the height of absurdity. It is equally repugnant to impugn and denigrate the memory of these remarkable Christian gentlemen.
In fact, after refusing Abraham Lincoln’s offer to command the Union Army in 1861, Robert E. Lee wrote to his sister on April 20 of that year to explain his decision. In the letter he wrote, “With all my devotion to the Union and the feeling of loyalty and duty of an American citizen, I have not been able to make up my mind to raise my hand against my relatives, my children, my home. I have therefore resigned my commission in the army and save in defense of my native state, with the sincere hope that my poor services may never be needed . . . .”
Lee’s decision to resign his commission with the Union Army must have been the most difficult decision of his life. Remember that Lee’s direct ancestors had fought in America’s War For Independence. His father, “Light Horse Harry” Henry Lee, was a Revolutionary War hero, Governor of Virginia, and member of Congress. In addition, members of his family were signatories to the Declaration of Independence.
Remember, too, that not only did Robert E. Lee graduate from West Point “at the head of his class” (according to Benjamin Hallowell), he is yet today one of only two cadets to graduate from that prestigious academy without a single demerit.
However, Lee knew that Lincoln’s decision to invade the South in order to prevent its secession was both immoral and unconstitutional. As a man of honor and integrity, the only thing Lee could do was that which his father had done: fight for freedom and independence. And that is exactly what he did.
Instead of allowing a politically correct culture to sully the memory of Robert E. Lee and Thomas J. Jackson, all Americans should hold them in a place of highest honor and respect. Anything less is a disservice to history and a disgrace to the principles of truth and integrity.
Accordingly, it was more than appropriate that the late President Gerald Ford, on August 5, 1975, signed Senate Joint Resolution 23 “restoring posthumously the long overdue, full rights of citizenship to General Robert E. Lee.” According to President Ford, “This legislation corrects a 110-year oversight of American history.” He further said, “General Lee’s character has been an example to succeeding generations . . . .”
In addition, most people will be surprised to learn that Confederate soldiers are officially American Veterans by four separate acts of Congress (1900, 1906, 1929, and 1958). Therefore, the desecration and/or removal of the statues and memorials of Confederate veterans is an assault, insult, and attack against ALL of America’s veterans.
See this report:
Confederate Soldiers – American Veterans By Act Of Congress
All of the hysteria over the Confederate monuments and statues is just so much propaganda--and race baiting.
Virtually every act of federal usurpation of liberty that we are witnessing today--and have been witnessing for much of the twentieth (and now twenty-first) century--is the result of Lincoln’s war against the South. Washington and Jefferson’s vision of liberty and limited government under a constitutional republic died at Appomattox Court House in 1865.
And speaking of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, you can mark my words: after the Lincoln-worshipping socialists have finished removing the statues and memorials that honor the brave men of the American Confederacy, they will turn their attention to removing the statues and memorials of the brave men of the American colonies. That’s what tyrants do: they try to remove all semblances of resistance from any city or country that they control. That is exactly what globalist-sponsored terror groups, such as ISIS, are attempting to do among the communities they control--and that’s exactly what globalist-sponsored hate groups such as Antifa are attempting to do in our country right now.
You can mark this down: many of the so-called white supremacists and neo-Nazis that we saw in Charlottesville were in reality professional government provocateurs and agitators who were being paid to stir up hate and violence with the intention of creating anti-America groups like Antifa. The CIA does stuff like this all of the time in nations all over the world. There is no doubt in my mind that dark forces within our own federal government are behind most of this civil unrest. In truth, THEY are the real fascists!
And, pathetically, many--if not most--of our churches and Christian colleges and universities are following in lockstep with this attack against our heritage. One large Christian college in Florida recently expelled a student for standing in front of a statue of General Lee with a small Confederate flag in his hand. This same college (along with the elementary and high school that it owns and operates) constantly promotes Abraham Lincoln as America’s great savior. I dare say this would be true for the vast majority of Christian schools and churches across the country. No wonder today’s Christians can’t seem to recognize, much less stand up against, unconstitutional government: our churches and Christian schools have turned most of them into sheepish slaves of the state.
Today it is Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson; tomorrow it will be George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. And, folks, don’t look now, but tomorrow is already here.
P.S. For people to truly understand Abraham Lincoln and his war against the South, I believe it is absolutely essential to read Thomas DiLorenzo’s phenomenal book “The Real Lincoln: A New Look At Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, And An Unnecessary War.”
Instead of an American hero who sought to free the slaves, Lincoln was in fact a calculating politician who waged the bloodiest war in American history in order to build an empire that rivaled Great Britain's.
Through extensive research and meticulous documentation, DiLorenzo portrays the sixteenth president as a man who devoted his political career to revolutionizing the American form of government from one that was very limited in scope and highly decentralized--as the Founding Fathers intended--to a highly centralized, activist state. Standing in his way, however, was the South with its independent states, its resistance to the national government, and its reliance on unfettered free trade. To accomplish his goals, Lincoln subverted the Constitution, trampled states' rights, and launched a devastating Civil War, whose wounds haunt us still. According to this provocative book, 600,000 American soldiers did not die for the honorable cause of ending slavery but for the dubious agenda of sacrificing the independence of the states to the supremacy of the federal government, which has been tightening its vise grip on our Republic to this very day.
You will discover a side of Lincoln that you were doubtless never taught in school--a side that calls into question the very myths that surround him and helps explain the true origins of a bloody and unnecessary war.
GET THIS BOOK: “The Real Lincoln,” by Thomas DiLorenzo. Find it here:
The Real Lincoln

From Anna Von Reitz

 I want to add another couple insights into Chuck Baldwin's educational manifesto "In Defense of Lee and Jackson"---- 

1. The so-called American Civil War was never declared by the United States in Congress Assembled.  That means it wasn't a war, folks, it was an illegal mercenary conflict on our shores. 

2.  The so-called American Civil War was never ended by any official peace treaty.  

3. Chuck Baldwin stopped short of really pushing home the truth about the "13th Amendment" to the corporate constitution.  Not only did this deceptive piece of word-smithing not abolish slavery, it made it a permanent fixture and part of the corporate government's policy as it condoned enslavement of "criminals" and left the perpetrators of these venal evils free to define crime and to "criminalize" anyone for anything.  Their heirs have since promulgated more than 80,000,000 "statutory laws" and "administrative codes" which are routinely used for precisely this purpose. 

4. It is more than past time for all of us to wake up and learn our real history and teach it to our children, so that they are not easy prey for the vermin that have infested our shores and cost our nation entire generations lost to war, plagued with unjust taxation, and harassment at the hands of our own paid employees. 

Thursday, August 24, 2017

The Monsters Under Our Beds -- Take 20 Minutes to Face Them


By Anna Von Reitz

Remember when you were a little kid and you were afraid of monsters and bogey men under the bed, phantoms lurking in dark closets, and ghosts in attics?  I used to sleep with my older sister as a child and she always slept on the side of the bed facing the door, "So if any monsters come in, they will have to eat me first," she assured me.  

Well, it wasn't much assurance. It admitted the reality of monsters.... 

All in all, it was a good life lesson to consider the possibility of monsters at an early age. It prepares one for adulthood, and contesting with the very actual, factual monsters in our world. 

One of the strange things about monsters is that they usually don't realize that they are monsters at all.  They think they are perfectly normal and reasonable, even fashionable and often popular people.  

Please take the 20 minutes it requires to learn this actual very succinct history of the monsters lurking under our national bed and what they did to the indigenous people of America and---- before you blink and think that this history applies only to the Native people-- remember that the same men responsible for the vast genocide of animals and people described in this film were the ones who set up the framework and machinery of the Great Fraud used to steal our identities as living people and genocide all of us on paper. 

This is not a mistake.  This is not collateral damage.  This is the result of a multi-generational rampage by monsters, men blinded by prejudice, greed and self-interest placed in positions of power in our own government: evil in high places. What happened to the Lakota Sioux in physical fact has now been done to all --or nearly all of us-- on paper.  

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Stunning Leaked Footage of Bunkerville Standoff at Bundy Ranch in 2014



Published on Aug 23, 2017
The 2014 Bunkerville Standoff saw over 200 armed federal agents aim their guns at American citizens who had gathered in support of rancher Cliven Bundy. This shocking footage includes never before seen video clips from BLM dash and body cams. 

I would be glad to credit whoever put this footage together, but since it was leaked video I'm not aware of the original creator. If any of you know, you are welcome to pass the info on to me.

_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quM30...
Find Me On...

Patreon: http://bit.ly/2i1cFVv
YouTube: http://bit.ly/2iQhRZk
Facebook: http://bit.ly/2jfB59Q
Twitter: http://bit.ly/2i2I1Gf
Gab: http://bit.ly/2jnJxDZ
Minds: http://bit.ly/2iYkXcP
Vid.Me: http://bit.ly/2jeVDjZ
_
Copyright Disclaimer:
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The Power of the Jury -- The Beginning of the End


By Anna Von Reitz

People have asked me to comment on the Bundy related trial in Nevada and the jury's refusal to convict.  

If everyone properly understood jurisdiction and their own country's history, they would know that the ongoing trial is in itself invalid and farce-like and that "US citizens" have no right to address these men or apply their "state of state" statutes to them in the first place. 

When this all began the Bundys, if properly prepared, could have turned to the would-be Prosecutors and asked half a dozen questions, then walked away---- leaving their detractors and accusers to bite their own tongues.  Or, as I observed to one who accosted me, "You know, you shouldn't even be talking to me. I haven't given you permission." 

They are foreign to us.  

Hello?  Repeat --- they are FOREIGN to us. 

 Even though they speak the same language and may have been born in Little Rock, Arkansas, they are in a different foreign jurisdiction.  They don't play by the same rules or follow the same law.  So the next question is, why are we being accosted by them?  

What You Have Done


By Anna Von Reitz

Your donations have made many small miracles happen for me and my helpers and also for other people who simply needed help, asked for it, and got it.  

Almost immediately upon embarking on the life I have led for the past twenty-plus years, it became apparent that time spent mulling over, researching, and then testing the information I have shared with the world cuts into time spent doing many other things, including earning a living.  

I was luckier than most, because my life was my work and my work was my life and it all somehow managed to dove-tail.  I didn't have to meet a nine to five schedule.  I didn't have to worry constantly about basic expenses.  I was blessed with good health, a good mate, and a great education.  All the stars smiled on me and the blessings of God were warm on my shoulders.  

All I had to do was work and keep on trying and asking and looking and seeking and talking to other people on the same journey.  

Others have had a much harder road in one way or another.  A great many people were ensnared in federal traps and railroaded into prison terms and debilitating fines and fees. It has almost become a badge of honor to have a federal prison record.  Many have lost their families through divorce and rejection.  Many have suffered loss of jobs, homes, yes, even children. 

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Jury refuses to convict in Bundy ranch standoff - Las Vegas Sun News

https://m.lasvegassun.com/news/2017/aug/22/jury-refuses-to-convict-in-bundy-ranch-standoff/

Jury refuses to convict in Bundy ranch standoff

A federal jury in Las Vegas refused Tuesday to convict four accused gunman in a 2014 standoff with federal authorities near the Nevada ranch of states' rights figure Cliven Bundy.
In a verdict that delivered a stunning setback to federal prosecutors, the jury acquitted Ricky Lovelien and Steven Stewart of all 10 charges against them.
Defendants Scott Drexler and Eric Parker were found not guilty of most charges against them. The jury did not reach verdicts on four charges against Parker and two charges against Drexler.
The results stunned a courtroom full of the defendants' supporters, many of whom broke into applause after Chief U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro ordered Lovelien and Stewart freed immediately.
The judge set a hearing Wednesday to decide whether to free Parker and Drexler pending a decision by prosecutors whether to try them for a third time.
Prosecutors said the men conspired with Bundy family members and wielded weapons to threaten the lives of federal agents enforcing lawful court orders to remove Bundy cattle from public land after he failed to pay grazing fees.
Each man standing trial in Las Vegas faced 10 charges including conspiracy, interstate travel in aid of extortion, weapon possession and assault and threatening a federal officer.
Combined, the counts carried the possibility of more than 100 years in federal prison.

Your donations made this a reality. We are in overdrive now.

Here are a few pictures from the new office setup that your donations made possible.

We have completed the networking in the office, and now have access to all the files we had on the old XP machine on the new Windows 10 machine.  These computers sit behind 4 firewalls, plus one of the best suites of professional internet security programs we could find.

First the old computers and radios.



The office I work in is in the shape of a horseshoe. This is the top and right side. On the right is a full blown 6 radio ham emergency communications center.  See more here:
https://www.qrz.com/db/KC7MEZ

The laptop in the middle is used to send digital signals like a chat program, but over the air to other hams with those same capabilities. They are scattered around the world.  On the left is the old XP computer, which now is used mostly for email.

Here is the new computer we just got from MTS in Eureka Montana.  It's nice to have these really knowledgeable computer professionals right here in town.  www.montecsolutions.com



I haven't hooked up the document scanner yet but everything else is up and running including the printer/fax on the left.  The old Tandy antique behind the monitors is dedicated to my telephone/radio interconnect.



This new office setup is already making my job much more effective, and you wouldn't believe the speed that these new solid state drives and our fiber optic connection make possible.  Pages load from the internet like they would load if they were on your internal drive. In short, I am never waiting on the computer. It's waiting on me now.

This is going to make possible lots of new advertising for Anna.

You should know that all of you who donated to make this possible are in our prayers every day.

If you have any questions about how you can support this effort here is my contact info.

Paul Stramer
SLC Distributing
PO Box 116
Eureka Montana 59917
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
800 889 2839 + 0





Your "gOVERnMENt" is Robbing you Blind to Fund their Global Agenda



For the full Story on how government steals more money than they need to fund their lawful duties go here:

http://cafr1.com/listings/Listings.html

There are about 4600 CAFR reports of accounts hidden from most people.

What is gOVERnMENt  doing with all these millions?

Paul Stramer

------------------------------

This caricature picture has very high impact per generating a strong cognitive thought for the viewer who is unaware of the CAFR to investigate further, triggers curiosity carry-through, and after review of a few, to share the same with others.
It has the effect of exponentially breaking the "Silence is Golden Rule" that has been well in place for the last 70-years relative to the well in place suppression of the CAFR (Local Government's Holy Grail of accounting) being mentioned by the syndicated media; controlled education; and Political Parties, which is in accounting terms; local government's: "Statement of Net Worth" that every taxpayer should be going over with a fine-toothed comb.
I request sincerely that all on the CAFR1 National email list use this caricature picture on their website, postings, Facebook, email communications, etc. and that they share with all that they know to do the same.
The picture can be copied (right click your mouse over the picture and select "save image as") then when saved it can be re-sized larger or smaller to fit your use needs and make sure to embed the link (you need to re-embed the link after the picture file is saved and then used by you) to the CAFR example listings page.
A strong wish to you from CAFR1 and the TRFA of the best in life for one and all.

Truly Yours,

Walter J. Burien, Jr.
Manager - TRFA and CAFR1
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936
 (928) 458-5854 Arizona

Monday, August 21, 2017

The Lincoln Myth: Ideological Cornerstone of the America Empire

From one of our readers.

By wmw_admin on August 21, 2017 

"Treason is defined by Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution as follows: “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” The most important word here is “them.” As in all the founding documents, “United States” is always in the plural, signifying that the “free and independent states,” as they are called in the Declaration of Independence, are united in forming a compact or confederacy with other states. Levying war against “them” means levying war against individual states, not something called “the United States government.” Therefore, Lincoln’s invasion and levying of war upon the Southern states is the very definition of treason in the Constitution.

Sunday, August 20, 2017

INSTRUCTION ON THE ELEVENTH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST

Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's Year

At the Introit pray with the priest for brotherly love and for protection against our enemies within and without:
INTROIT God in his holy place; God, who maketh men of one mind to dwell in a house: he shall give power and strength to his people. Let God arise, and let his enemies be scattered; and let them that hate him flee from before His face. (Ps. LXVII.) Glory etc.
COLLECT Almighty, everlasting God, who, in the abundance of Thy loving kindness, dost exceed both the merits and desires of Thy suppliants; pour down upon us Thy mercy, that thou mayest forgive those things of which our conscience is afraid, and grant us those things which our prayer ventures not to ask. Through...
EPISTLE (i Cor. XV. 1-10.) Brethren, I make known unto you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you have received, and wherein you stand: by which also you are saved: if you hold fast after what manner I preached unto you, unless you have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all, which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures: and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: and that he was seen by Cephas, and after that by the eleven. Then was he seen by more than five hundred brethren at once, of whom many remain until this present, and some are fallen asleep. After that he was seen by James, then by all the apostles. And last of all, he was seen also by me, as by one born out of due time. For I am the least of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God; but by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace in me hath not been void.
INSTRUCTION I. St. Paul warns the Corinthians against those who denied the Resurrection of Christ and exhorts them to persevere in the faith which they have received, and to live in accordance with the same. Learn from this to persevere firmly in the one, only saving Catholic faith, which is the same that Paul preached.
II. In this epistle to the Corinthians St. Paul gives us a beautiful example of humility. Because of the sins he had committed before his conversion, he calls himself one born out of due time, the least of the apostles, and not worthy of being called an apostle, although he had labored much in the service of Christ. He ascribes it to God's grace that he was what he was. Thus speaks the truly humble man: he sees in himself nothing but weakness, sin, and evil, and therefore despises himself and is therefore willing to be despised by others. The good which he professes or practices, he ascribes to God, to whom he refers all the honor. Endeavor, too, O Christian soul, to attain such humility. You have far more reason to do so than had St. Paul, because of the sins which you have committed since your baptism, the graces which you have abused, and the inactive, useless life you have led.

Thursday, August 17, 2017

Immunity to Lies and the Lure of Power



By  Anna Von Reitz

There are many, many kinds of lies.  

It strikes me that I should review the basics for everyone.  

There are outright old-fashioned lies that people tell and they can tell them to achieve something or they can tell them for no very substantial reason at all ---- like Fish Stories.  

These old-fashioned lies run the gamut for lying to your wife about working late to lying to your best friend about what you are doing on Saturday.  People often tell such lies to avoid unpleasant consequences or fights or just to avoid hurting someone else's feelings or causing them worry.  

These latter variety of "lies in a good cause" have been called "noble lies" but in fact there are no noble lies.  

Lies about your weight, your health, your intentions, your job status, lies designed to impress others, lies to make others like you, lies to make others respect you, lies to make yourself look good, lies to avoid punishment, lies to excuse bad behavior, lies to gain something material --- a promotion, a new car, a good seat at the movies -- all these sorts of lies are common as dirt.  

These lies are simple and driven by petty circumstance.  Most people engage in them so constantly that they don't even notice they are doing it:  

"I have to comb my hair!"  

Well, no, you don't really "have to".

Full Court Press for The Historic Trusts


By Anna Von Reitz

The assets of the world are largely owned by Historic Trusts--- vast holdings of actual assets including gold, silver, platinum, rhodium, gems, art, land, government bonds, corporate stock and much, much more.  

There are several different kinds of Historic Trusts.  

Most of them are private family trusts and in the Western World, many of them are Spanish, resulting from the days of the Conquistadors and the New World Gold. In the Far East, you also find Spanish gold that migrated there, especially in the Philippines, and you find traditional Chinese family gold hordes, too. 

Other Historic Trusts are family trusts resulting from mining or industrial operations and investments, still others are Treaty Trusts that accrue to specific nations as "national trusts" or for specific purposes such as war reparations or infrastructure investments.  Still others result from court settlements and land trust investments. Some of the largest trusts are old Commonwealth Trusts created in the 1600's by wealthy trading companies; the oldest of these Historic Trusts dates to 435 A.D.  

And there are, of course, a dizzying array of Church Trusts, which are "historic" but which are not traditionally included as Historic Trusts in the sense discussed here. 

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

First Hand Account about Charlottesville



Found here: http://operationdisclosure.blogspot.com/2017/08/video-charlottesville-police-officer.html

Turn off your television sets and go to the internet.


Paul, I found this on Kessler too. Makes sense since they always control both sides. Remember how they fund both sides of all wars. Susan

Unite the Right Protesters Hoodwinked by their Own Leader

http://canadafreepress.com/article/unite-the-right-protesters-hoodwinked-by-their-own-leader
Also found the following in the commend section of Zerohedge:
There is a website, the reliablility of which I really can't vouch for, that claims to have evidence that the alleged organizer of the rally to protest the removal of the statue in Charlottesville was, up until mid-November of 2016, a Democratic operative, former CNN assignment editor, and former Occupy Wall Street activist (with photos to prove this particular claim) by the name of Jason Kessler. Kessler was allegedly recruited by Brennan Gilmore, a known deep-cover CIA operative recently stationed in central Africa, to infiltrate the "Unite the Right" movement and become a leader for that loosely knit group. After Trump's November victory, Gilmore left Africa and became the chief of staff for his former station boss, Democrat Tom Perriello, who launched a bid for Governor of Virginia but lost in the June 13th primary. After Perriello's loss, Gilmore became an adviser to Charlottesville mayor Michael Signer, who famously proclaimed that he wanted to make Charlottesville "the center of the resistance". How convenient that Kessler, a literal newcomer to the Unite the Right movement, was somehow able to organize and promote a rally that was bound to attract some KKK and neo-Nazi types, in Charlottesville, VA, where Mayor Signer was looking to make a name for his town as the center of the resistance. I smell a rat, several rats to be exact. This entire event appears to have been deliberately set-up.

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Paul Stramer <pstramer@eurekadsl.net> wrote:

You might be right Phyllis.  Here is another article I found saying the whole thing is a psyop and Kessler is a double agent for the left paid by Soros.