Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Monday, December 31, 2012

Military hero defies Feinstein



Thanks Kevin, I am pleased to be passing this on to my list.   http://www.bigbearammo.com/Default.asp

The whole front page of my blog is about guns right now.  These gun grabbers are traitors and want to set us up for a totalitarian government and genocide.
It's happened throughout history that murder and mayhem are always caused by out of control GOVERNMENT and the worst terrorists are government agents.
What many of them don't realize is that they are helping sell out our country to international communist terrorist dictators and total control of our country.
They think they will be in a position of authority when the takeover is done. I have news for them. Just google "history of communist purges".  When the takeover is done those officials who helped the communists get into power and were willing to sell out their country are the first ones the commies shoot in the head, because they know they can not be trusted.  So Dianne Feinstein is putting nails in her own coffin by playing footsie with these murderous monsters.
There is only one hope for this country. That is the American patriot who has their mind made up, and has drawn a line in  the sand. There are over 20.000 so called gun laws on the books in Amerika that are NOT LAW AT ALL.

Paul Stramer KC7MEZ
SLC Distributing
PO Box 116
Eureka MT 59917
800 889 2839
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
Paul ‘ you probly have already seen this but I thought I would mail it to you just in case.
Kevin,… PS Thanks for all the info, I’m going to be giving it out, Diana and I will be spending New Years Eve With the Big Bear fire Arms Folks and I will make darn shure it gets into their hands!!!! In paper form. PSS.this morning I heard a commercial by Nazi Leader Obama trying to get young people to join his new government gastopo organization this was the first time I have ever heard this commercial . What a wolf in sheeps clothing!!!!

Feinstein Assault Weapons Ban Covers Rifles, Pistols and Shotguns

The New Year is just around the corner and although the Senate still hasn’t made a fiscal cliff deal, Senator Diane Feinstein already has parts of new gun control legislation ready to go. Two Sunday’s ago on NBC’s Meet the Press, Feinstein talked about giving President Obama a bill he can “lead on” and used the term assault weapon loosely.
Feinstein has posted a summary of what the legislation will cover, which includes a ban on semi-automatic handguns and shotguns in addition to rifles. The legislation also requires registration of previously purchased guns. If passed, ATF would be in charge of enforcement which should be a huge concern to gun owners.
Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
120 specifically-named firearms
Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.
Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressers from the characteristics test
Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans
Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes and
Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons
Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
Background check of owner and any transferee;
Type and serial number of the firearm;
Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration”

Now read the reaction of one of our military heros to this bill
Senator Dianne Feinstein,
I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government's right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma'am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.
I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.
We, the people, deserve better than you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012

 joshdb50 was a Marine and was deployed to Afghanistan between the years of 2004 through 2005. Although he is no longer in the military he acknowledges that he owns gun. He says he does not believe the government needs to what guns he owns because he believes registration would lead to confiscation. He says the laws that are in place for gun control are plenty, and adding more laws will remove a means of defense for people. 'I own the guns I own because I acknowledge mankind's shortcomings instead of pretending like they don't exist. There are evil men in this world and there just may be a time when I need to do the unthinkable to protect me or my family,' he said.
-
Jareen, CNN iReport producer

Friday, December 28, 2012

Gun Control and Genocide.

You can't have Genocide without first having Gun Control!

Gary North has written a very powerful and detailed article about Genocide as a result of the lack of the ability of a people to fight back.

You need to read this and print it to give to your sheriff and anyone who advocates gun bans.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north367.html

"There is a reason why governments are committed to disarming their citizens. They want to maintain the monopoly of violence, no matter what. The idea of an armed citizenry is anathema to most politicians. After all, what's a monopoly for, if not to be used?"

Is Mass Media the real cause of violent gun crimes?

The star of the new super violent movie Django Unchained,  Jamie Fox, realizes the connection between movie violence and actual violence in the real world.

“We cannot turn our back and say that violence in films or anything that we do doesn’t have a sort of influence,” Foxx said. “It does.”

http://www.movieguide.org/articles/main/give-django-an-nc-17-rating.html

The Christian Film & Television Commission® is trying to get the rating changed so nobody under 17 can watch this movie. 
Please comment.  Do you think that young people watching movies like this are effected in their behavior?  Do these movies and violent video games add to the mindset that spawns violent gun crimes like Sandy Hook?

Please click the comments link below and add your thoughts.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Obama Orders Children Murdered .




Published on Dec 19, 2012
As Obama grandstands and uses the Sandy Hook crisis to, in the words of Eric Holder "brainwash the public" that guns are bad and the cause of violent crime and misery, We decided to show just a few of the documented cases of drone attacks that he personally ordered where children were killed. Drone attack after drone attack you will see the real face of the Globalists. This man does not care about children he cares about disarming the American people to bring in a totalitarian government.



Ban the Gun Grabbers and their Gun Free Zones

Gun Free Zones are lawless Safety Free Zones!


The primary-school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, approximately 45 miles from the Colt Arms Factory, is just another one in the long line of government psyops designed to persuade the public to allow the government to take away their guns, and their means to defend themselves against the government and the banksters that the politicians really serve.

The small children murders are designed to create hysterical emotions in women to get them to demand that guns are banned. If that doesn't work they will continue with their evil agenda with worse and worse atrocities on younger children, until they get their way and disarm the people, so that they cannot fight back against government tyranny.

Newtown is the U.S.A.'s Dunblane, which was orchestrated in Scotland in 1996 by the British establishment, to whip up hysteria in order to ban all handguns from the U.K. It was a follow-up to the Hungerford Massacre in England in 1987, which was carried out by mind-controlled Michael Ryan, who then shot himself so he could not be questioned, and it was used to ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.

It's always the same people behind it - the gun-grabbers who want the people to be defenceless against the gun-grabbers' employers - the banksters who own all of the politicians. They get their politicians to pass legislation for them, in order to remove the people's freedoms and means of defending themselves, and enslave them in a draconian police-state, under a mountain of debt, and then exterminate the useless-eaters.

The Dunblane  massacre was supposedly carried out by Thomas Hamilton, who was a paedophile and procurer of children, for a high level paedophile ring involving senior members of the Tony Blair Labour-Party shadow-cabinet and others. The massacre served two purposes, it achieved their desired handgun-ban and killed the abused children, so they could not be witnesses against the elite-paedophiles. They then had the findings of the inquiry sealed for 100 years, which is proof of the above.

Like Newtown there were two shooters, Hamilton and a hit-man who shot Hamilton and made it look like Hamilton committed suicide after shooting 16 children, so that he couldn't be questioned. Hamilton was found in the school gymnasium slumped against a wall and still gurgling, when an off-duty policeman PC Grant McCutcheon entered the gym and saw two semi-automatic pistols, one on either side of Hamilton's body.

The autopsy revealed that Hamilton was killed with a .38 revolver. These people always slip-up with their crimes. There was no .38 revolver for him to have shot himself with. Thus, there was a second shooter who killed Hamilton.

Similarly, the first reports from Newtown were of two shooters, just like mind-controlled James Holmes in the Denver Batman Cinema massacre, the story then quickly changes to just one.

Columbine was similar, in that a team of shooters in black outfits were seen there and the two accused were on mind-altering prescription-drugs.

Wake up and see the pattern and their modus operandi and don't fall for it. Never let them take your guns, except from your cold dead hands.

All of these are staged events to whip-up hysterical public support for banning the people from having guns. It works the same in every country - Hungerford in England, Dunblane in Scotland, Port Arthur in Australia and the list in America is endless, because of the Second Amendment and the people having a pro-gun culture. That makes it much more difficult to break the Americans' love of guns and the Second Amendment, which was put in place to protect the people from the government.

Gun bans work well for tyrants. They worked well for Hitler, Stalin and Chairman Mao, to name just three.

If you want to stop these massacres, wake-up and get rid of the banksters, their puppet-politicians and all gun-grabbers; arm teachers and ban gun-free zones.

From one who can see the pattern and hopes to enable you to see it too.

Freedom Fighter
------------------------------------------

"Gun-free zones are like magnets for the monsters in our society" - Larry Pratt GOA

The above article is from one of our readers, and I challenge you to prove this wrong.
Click the comment link right below.

Monday, December 24, 2012

So Wayne LaPierre wants a new government police force to police the schools.


 BIG MISTAKE!!!!!!!!!!
Is the answer to everything more government?  What makes him think the guard in uniform won't be the firstone to die?
And then who is left to protect the kids? The uniform just makes it easier for the criminal to identify, target and take out the persons most likely to offer resistance to their intended crimes.
If anyone in the country should know that more government doesn't work it should be the NRA.
The government had Dianne Feinsteine's assault weapons "law" on the books in the 90s and the Columbine shooting still happened. The ban did absolutely nothing to stop it, and La Pierre knows that.  Banning weapons in certain places just creates FREE KILLING ZONES FOR THE CRAZY PEOPLE, AND FOR GOVERNMENT HIT SQUADS.
Mr. La Pierre, you said the mental health system has totally collapsed. What do you suggest to fix that? Would you give that to government also?  Will you let failed "mental health professionals" decide who is sane and who is not?  Would you now let government mental health people getting paid by our tax money decide who can have guns and who can't?
WHAT WOULD MAKE US BELIEVE that these people wouldn't tend to try to justify their own paycheck like everyone else in government, by putting lots of people on the unworthy list that don't belong there? What makes you think that veterans and shooting enthusiasts wouldn't be put on the list or committed for mental health reasons, to remove opposition to the gun grabbers.
What government agency do you know of that wouldn't use this to remove their opposition? What government agency do you know of that operates using pure and moral or even lawful intent?
After all, the jails are full, so the people that run them can keep the per diem pay coming. Look at the result of the so called drug war.
The jails are full of people who either got caught with a half ounce of marijuana, or had evidence planted by crooked cops so they could confiscate their stuff. Police departments are auctioning off all kinds of stuff they confiscated and keeping the money to finance more firepower and military style equipment so they can do even more raiding. It's a vicious cycle of plunder under the color of "law".
It's so bad now that there are over 2 MILLION people behind bars in this country that we have to support with our tax dollars.
The jails and the courts and cops that keep them full are now a huge GROWTH INDUSTRY worth billions upon billions of dollars per year.
So do you want, now, to make the mental hospitals a GROWTH INDUSTRY the same as the prison system? Really?
IS THAT YOUR SOLUTION? Come on, get real. You can do a lot better than that!
Is this what you call compromise;  giving up something that involves our rights, to get what might not even make a little more safety?  
The dictionary definition of compromise is:
"...settlement of differences by arbitration or by consent reached by mutual concessions".
There can be NO concession, or infringement on gun rights, in the same way that there can be NO concession on your absolute right to defend yourself and your neighbor against a threat to your life and well-being by someone using lethal force.
Read this article on what is really the law about guns:  http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html
The NRA is famous for this compromising of our absolute rights. 
PROHIBITED PLACES LAWS make absolutely no sense whatsoever.
An example right here in Montana is the so called law that prohibits a lawfully carrying person, even a concealed carry permit holder, from carrying his weapon in a cafe that serves beer and wine. 
In the first place, I have never seen any person in the cafes that I eat in ever get rowdy from too much to drink.
Second, if someone did, and I needed my gun to protect myself, it would be out in the car. A fat lot of good that would do me.
If I am eating and not consuming alcohol, the stupid so called "law" prevents me from defending myself and my family.
Third, there is no reason to believe that a concealed carry permit holder who has kept his record clean enough to hold that permit, is going to leave all that effort and common sense behind when he/she goes in that cafe. Ask the lady that testified before congress who watched her parents get shot and killed by the crazy gunman that crashed his vehicle through the front window of a fast food place in Texas and started shooting people. Her gun was in the car outside because the stupid prohibited places "law" said she couldn't have it in the cafe and like most "law abiding" people she left HER COMMON SENSE at the door in an attempt to obey a bad "law".  Do you really think it was a law and that she should have followed it? Do you really think she would do that same thing again, regardless of what the so called "law" says?
Then there is the federal so called "law" that stops even concealed permit holders from carrying in a  post office. They even want you to not have it in your car in the parking lot.
What absolute stupidity!   So you are in the precious metals business.  Your product is valuable. Very valuable. A little box that weighs in at 37 pounds, and measures about 12" X 8" X 5" can be worth over $20,000.  So you come to the post office to pick up a shipment that is shipped via registered mail, which packages always by postal regulations have to be kept in a safe when not being delivered, and the so called "law" makes it so you can't carry even a concealed handgun to protect yourself from a possible robbery.
Not only can you not carry in the building, but they don't even want your gun in the parking lot, so now you are forced to park OFF THE POSTAL PROPERTY, which requires you to carry that box of silver much farther WITHOUT YOUR GUN.  How absolutely insane is that?  Who should have their head examined now? Yes, the people that wrote that insane so called "law". Do you really think  that is a law?
Then let's go to the bank with about $80,000 in cash to buy a cashiers check to pay for that precious metal.  At least there is a little running room on this one. While that so called "law" is supposed to prevent a concealed carry permit holder from carrying concealed in the bank, it lets you carry in the open. So now your gun is right there on your hip for everyone in the bank to see.
So you come in the bank with a large amount of cash to deposit in  your account so you can get a cashiers check to send to the mint in payment for an order for one of your customers, and one of the tellers, perhaps a new one that doesn't know you, pushes the silent alarm button and all hell breaks lose.  Wouldn't it have been better to carry that gun concealed like you can do lawfully almost anywhere else, and not upset the banks' help or their customers, and yet you would still be protected from a possible robbery or assault?  Again, who wrote such an insane law?  Maybe they should have their head examined by that government goon mental health professional?
So now we come back to the school, or the theatre, where most of these crimes seem to be taking place.
In 1990 the government purported to put a "law" on the books called "The gun free school zones act of 1990".  In 1995 the Supreme Court blew it out of the water.
Then the infamous Janet Reno, made some changes that were "adopted and widely concealed" to get around the Supreme Court's decision, and today all the school authorities believe that one can not have a gun within 1000 feet of school property without a concealed carry permit.  This change has yet to be challenged in the Supreme Court.
In any case what this so called "law" did was make it possible for criminals to come to a school with the reasonable assumption that there would be no armed intervention while they were committing their crimes. The same result applies to a theater who's owner opts to prohibit any guns in their building. They create a "gun free zone" translation "law free zone" where law and order goes out the window.
The real solution that will work.
In the case of a school, the administrative staff, those that are willing, should get the proper training at some kind of professional firearms training facility like Front Sight in Pahrump Nevada (www.frontsight.com) and they should all carry concealed at the school during school hours. Right now they can do that if they have a concealed carry permit. They don't have to spend money to pass any new "law" under current interpretation. If the school wants to hire an armed guard, that person or persons should also do so with a concealed weapon and the only requirement would be that the guard has a concealed carry permit, but they also should get that proper training.  That way the prospective shooter would not know who was armed.
Then, and this is the big one, the school should post signs and advertise to the effect that any lethal force will be met with more than equal lethal force.
This also applies even better at the theater.  The theater should advertise first for people who have a concealed carry permit to come and be interviewed to receive some free tickets during the year, in return for carrying concealed while they are in the theater. The theater should insist that the perspective free ticket user should also have the proper training at a proper facility as mentioned above. Then the theater can advertise that there will be maybe a hundred people allowed to carry concealed in their theater, and that nobody will know who they are and when they will be using one of their tickets to attend a free movie. The theater can also say something to the effect that their buildings are not a gun free zone, but a crime free zone.
I can hear gun control people screaming "bloody murder" at me right now.  Those that do, ask yourself just one question.
Why do these whacos pick schools and theaters in the first place??? It's because of the stupid gun zone "laws", dummy! Duh!
Don't believe it???  Read this:  http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd565.htm
And finally, why am I using quotes around the word "laws" so much? Again:
And here are more facts:
Paul Stramer  

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Was Sandy Hook a Manufactured Crisis to take your guns?


Massacres and Guns






Why Switzerland Has The Lowest Crime Rate In The World


Read the comments on this blog page:

http://dont-tread-on.me/?p=26125

 What about this:
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/12/sandy-hook-false-flag-2-years-in-the-making-2524626.html

Saturday, December 22, 2012

The gun grabbers invented the term "assault rifle" to further their own agenda.


Send this out till your fingers are sore!
The gun grabbers invented the term "assault rifle" to further their own agenda.
Note the picture of the WW Two soldier or Korean War soldier proudly holding his M-1 rifle in the article at the link below.  This was the military style assault and main battle rifle until the early to mid sixties when the M-16 came on line.  The M-16 began that "look" that is so upsetting to the gun grabbers.  But in reality, It did nothing that the wooden stocked M-1 could do.  And the M-16 started the use of the small .223 caliber which the military uses today.  The M-1 was a 30-06, much, much more lethal.
I can remember when you could order an M-1 for under $100 from the back pages of many magazines.  I have trained with the M-1 Garand and it was capable of fully automatic or semi-auto.
What's called an assault rifle today is just a copy of the current military rifle.  It is a style but civilians cannot buy one that is fully automatic.  Those on the civilian market are not capable of fully automatic mode.  The term assault is better suited to the way the police use them busting into the wrong house...now that's an assault.
The right to keep and bear arms was put into the 2nd amendment not so the people could have guns to hunt with, but to fight any out of control tyrant.  The military at that time fought with muskets, those were the military rifles of that time and muskets were the guns of the people.
What's termed today as an assault rifle is just today's version of today's military rifle.  The word assault is a military term for close in combat with firearms.  The M1903 Springfield bolt action rifle was used in World War One as an assault rifle.  It was neither automatic nor semi-auto.  It required a lot of skill to rapidly fire.  If you've ever seen the movie, Sergeant York starring Gary Cooper, then you have seen the M1903 Springfield.  York was more than an expert with that gun.
The Springfield 1903 was also a 30-06 like the M-1 that mostly took over in WW-2.  The 30-06 became the premier high power hunting cartridge of the 20th century.  The modern military assault rifle shoots the puny, by comparison, 223 which in some states is outlawed for hunting deer, because too many times the deer is only wounded and runs away to die a prolonged death.
I hope I have made it plain that for hundreds of years the people have used the same style rifle as the military.  I have shown that the WW-1 assault rifle was not an automatic or semi-automatic but rather a bolt action rifle.  Please note in the accompanying article the writer says that at some point the gun grabbers in the government will try to ban the bolt action by calling it a sniper rifle.
Kent

Friday, December 21, 2012

Armed Citizen Saves Cop’s Life

Sgt. Steven Means of the Early Police Department in Texas, is one law enforcement officer that is thankful for the Second Amendment right for citizens to bear arms.

Read more: 

http://godfatherpolitics.com/8635/armed-citizen-saves-cops-life/#ixzz2Fl6lOOCa


Gun Owner Saves Cop's Life by Shooting Deranged Gunman!

All "gun control" so called laws are Null and Void

There are NO valid gun control laws in the USA. They want you to believe those "laws" are valid and law for you and I to follow but they are NOT valid, NOT lawful and NOT in force.

How do I know that?   Just keep reading.

1.  Go to any search engine, like www.ixquick.com or www.google.com   and type in  dick act repealed.
You will see a whole page of articles on the Dick Act of 1902.  I am NOT talking about any act passed in 1903. This was the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654 
The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

I have found page after page on the internet that all essentially say the same thing.

Here are some links.

http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3949

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread483246/pg1

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/108957/DICK_ACT_of_1902_CANT_BE_REPEALED_GUN_CONTROL_FORBIDDEN/

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=151233

http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642

2. Then there is the principle that unconstitutional "laws" are null and void from their inception.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
The higher laws always prevail when there is a conflict between them. There never will be a conflict between positive divine law, and natural law.  They are.
1. Positive Divine Law
2. Natural Law
3. Human law   notice it is on the bottom and the least of all law. This includes all civil and criminal "laws" and even cannon law.
Whenever there is a conflict between any of these,  the higher laws are always to prevail in God's eyes and they do. 
3. The current government wants all jury trials to go away. They want their corrupt judges to try all cases without a jury. They have been working for years to discredit Juries.
YOU HAVE THE POWER TO NULLIFY (refuse to apply) any bad so called "laws" as an individual juror.  Yes, you have that power; it is real; it is now; and all you need to use it is the knowledge that you have that power.
Your jury rights are your most powerful rights. Instead of trying to avoid jury duty, you should be trying to get on every jury you can. That will give you ample opportunity to educate your fellow jurors about their right to nullify bad "laws". It will also get you into a position where you can (all by yourself without another person) nullify bad law by hanging the jury (refusing to apply the so called "law" to the case you are on).
If you don't believe me take a look at this.

http://www.juryrights.info

4. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy. 
The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.

5. The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
6. Then there is the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, which was passed and signed into law by Governor Schweitzer. 
http://www.wnd.com/2010/05/159485/

And this from Chuck Baldwin:
Pertaining specifically to the Second Amendment, the State of Montana, in particular, seems to have it all together. In anticipation of the recent Heller Supreme Court decision, a host of Montana's senators and representatives—along with its Secretary of State— proposed a resolution stating "that any 'collective rights' holding in D.C. v. Heller will violate Montana's compact with the United States, the contract by which Montana entered the Union in 1889."
The Montana resolution recalls, "When Montana entered into statehood and adopted the Compact as a part of the Montana Constitution in 1889, included was a provision guaranteeing the right to bear arms to 'any person.'"
The resolution continues, "To be clear, the wording of the right to bear arms reservation in the Montana constitution is exactly the same today as it was in 1884."
Furthermore, the Montana resolution says, "There is no question that the contract into which Montana entered for statehood was predicated upon an understanding that the people of Montana would benefit from an individual and personal right to bear arms, protected from governmental interference by both the federal and Montana constitutions. That was the clear intent of the parties to the contract."
The resolution ended by stating sternly, "A collective rights holding in Heller would not only open the Pandora's box of unilaterally morphing contracts, it would also poise Montana to claim appropriate and historically entrenched remedies for contract violation."
In other words, representatives and senators in the State of Montana unequivocally put Washington, D.C., on notice that it would not tolerate the infringement of its citizens' right to keep and bear arms. I don't think I'm reading anything into the resolution by assuming that they were implying that they would secede before they let the federal government trample their Second Amendment liberties. (Plus, I've just been told that New Hampshire may also be preparing to propose such a resolution.)
7. Then there is the original compact that Montana entered with the federal government when we became a state. No less than 2 Attorneys General and one Governor have warned the Feds that any abrogation of firearms freedom in Montana by the feds will result in the breaking of that compact, which in it's logical conclusion would (in my opinion) result in Montana no longer being a State of that federal union.
8. Then there is the ABSOLUTE natural law right to self defense. Your inalienable and individual right was always contained in the US Constitution, but was clarified in 2008 by the US Supreme Court.

How about this "what if" gun seizure scenrio?

And finally "The Coming Gun Grab"  received this morning from a Montana patriot  who will remain anonymous.
" I'm not worried about a successful gun confiscation program in America. I just don't know if enough Americans will have the guts to shoot the government thugs. That is the only relevant question regarding future gun control. On this point, I quote from a speech by the latte novelist Taylor Caldwell:
"I'm going to castigate all you men here for what you have done to America  - every mother's son of you.
How did we arrive at this disastrous hour in time? I will tell you. You men.... abdicated your manhood!
You deserted the Republic. Aristotle said two thousand and five hunred years ago: "Masculine republics decline into feminine democracies and democracies into despotism."  That is what has happened to America now. We call ourselves a free country. We are not free! Tomorrow the tyranny will be overt instead of covert as it is now.
Is there any hope? Well, only a little, and I;m afraid that few men will take advantage of it.  One: Challenge your government and, if you suffer for it, to hell with sweet peace.
TWO: FIGHT GUN CONTROL! It is your right to bear arms under the Constitution (THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND FOR GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW) but the tyrants want to take away your arms so you won't be able to offer any resistance to bayonets!
Gentlemen, you can restore your dead Republic. But be again the masters of your government and be again the masters of your women or will you meekly say: "Hail, Caeser, we who are about to die salute you."
(End quote from Tayler Caldwell)

Don't worry that they'll get your guns. Worry that you might NOT have the guts to use them. Will you let federal barbarians storm your neighborhood, breaking down doors - or will everybody on your block rain a torrent of copper-jacketed lead on these thugs? It's about to hit the fan - will you be courageous?

If you can't imagine -gasp!- defending your rights and your property and your family against the Government, then SELL YOUR GUNS TO A REAL MAN. Who are you fooling? You don't deserve a Zeiss-scoped Sako any more than a .22 Jennings.

Give up your guns now and spare yourself the embarrassment later. 
The 2nd Amendment is for men - not hobbyists.

And here is one of the best pledges I have ever read from a man that I know personally and who I absolutely believe will do exactly as he says:

My Personal Pledge of Resistance Against Any Attemp to Disarm Us by Means of an "Assault Weapons Ban"

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2012/12/19/my-personal-pledge-of-resistance-against-any-attemp-to-disarm-us-by-means-of-an-assault-weapons-ban/

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Gun Controller in Chief's home town Chicago kills more kids

Chicago: 446 school age children shot so far this year with strongest gun laws in country – media silent The cesspool known as Chicago probably has the toughest gun laws in the country, yet despite all the shootings, murders, and bloodshed, you never hear a peep about this from the corrupt state run media. In Chicago, there have been ... READ MORE

This is the REAL OBAMA !

----- Original Message -----
From: Basil Fishbone
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:27 PM
Subject: Obama Justifies FEMA Imprisonment Of Civilians!

Commentary by Rachel Maddow.

Maddow was very nice to Ron Paul... and she's right on again with this.   Rachel is on the "civil libertarian left", and I think she illustrates the need to be open to communication and cooperation against which certainly appears to be an impending tyranny right here at home.   The Powers that Be want us to be fighting each other, not them.   ~Basil

Obama Justifies FEMA Imprisonment Of Civilians!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr9NCZP_fbU&feature=player_embedded

-----------------------------------------

Get your guns, then put you in jail. That is what he wants.

How long will it be until he says something like, well, we just can't afford to keep all these people in jail, so we have to get rid of them.

They know that juries can stop their lawlessness! So they want to eliminate the whole messy thing of a trial, and a jury, and just be able to put you away at their whim.

The founders would have been done by now!

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Monday, December 17, 2012

Crazy Shootings? Don't believe the media

Here are some stories that the mainstream media is avoiding completely about the latest shootings around the country. The media wouldn't know the truth if it slapped them upside the head.

Don't have any loaded guns around when you read these stories, because it's going to make you very, very angry that the truth is not being told.


MEDIA BLACKOUT: OREGON MALL SHOOTER WAS STOPPED BY AN ARMED CITIZEN !


GUN CONTROL: A DIVIERSION FROM REALITY


BREAKING NEWS: CT SCHOOL SHOOTER KILLER LINK TO LIBOR SCANDAL

Watch the videos in this one. Very revealing.


WHO REALLY KILLED THE CONNECTICUT CHILDREN?


GUN EXPERT LOTT: LET TEACHERS CARRY ARMS, BAN GUN-FREE ZONES TO HALT MASS SHOOTINGS






The News Media won't tell you this about the Oregon Shooter


Media blackout: Oregon mall shooter was stopped by an armed citizen!

The shooter, Jacob Tyler Roberts, was confronted with an armed citizen, at which time he ran away and shot himself. By the time police arrived on the scene, Roberts was already dead.

Read the entire story here:

Sunday, December 16, 2012

The Solution to our Nation’s ‘Gun Problem’

We need some public executions to send a message.

Thieves don’t care about laws against theft, and rapists don’t care about laws against rape. The same is true about drinking and driving.

Schools should immediately develop a program where every teacher is trained in how to handle a firearm. 
Read more: 


http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/12/the-solution-to-our-nations-gun-problem/#ixzz2FHDav7fj

Take Your Precious Children Out of Government Schools


Take Your Precious Children Out of Government Schools
Have parents lost their minds? What will it take before they get their kids out of the government hell-hole? How about Christian parents for God’s sake!! How could a Christian ever put his/her child in a secular-training center? The media wants to blame guns, but no one wants to blame the schools. Let me paint a picture......
http://www.newswithviews.com/Daubenmire/dave304.htm
by Coach Dave Daubenmire

Friday, December 14, 2012

Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols


I have been following the international currency wars for 2 years now, and this email needs your attention. If the Deutsche Bank, which some say is the primary bank the Nazi machine is still using, although covertly, is now frozen, then there is about to be a huge upheaval in the European banking cabal, and the effects will be without precedent in all of history.
These banks are all interconnected with all the banksters in Amerika and this might be the first domino.
Pay attention to this and read the entire article about Leo Wanta. He is another  person that has been lied about on a  global basis for years. Even on the internet there are many articles that try to smear this guy. I am just saying that this needs to be watched continuously for the next while.

Paul

Here are some important links on this subject.



And from the Idaho Observer


The first 10 chapters of the new book are available under the Lee Wanta Biography here:

http://theglobalnewsandviews.com/lee-wanta-bio/

This is from one of the people that I know who have bought Iraqi Dinars in anticipation of a currency revaluation world wide. 12-12-12


It can now be reported that on the direct orders of the IMF (International Monetary Fund), the U.S. Provost Marshal, European INTERPOL and the German Police, all Deutsche Bank derivative-riddled proprietary accounts were frozen today on 12-12-12.
Item: The crooked U.S. Federal Reserve has now been totally neutralized by what took place in Europe today.
The announcement by Fed Chairman Bernard Bernanke of his program QE Infinity is not a stimulus but the continuation of a ponzi scheme to buy back toxic assets aka worthless mortgage-backed securities tied to major U.S. financial giants (gangster banks) and none other than their underwriter, the Nazi "Skull and Bones" Deutsche Bank.
P.S. Now that the Deutsche Bank has had their derivative accounts frozen there are really no derivatives outstanding for the crooked Fed to prop up.
Translation: QE4 is now Titanic5.
P.P.S. At this hour we can also divulge that gangster U.S. banks like Goldman Sachs and U.S. Bank are now totally exposed in new illegally cross-collateralized derivative positions aka written call options in crude oil and unleaded gasoline futures markets, which were designed to protect their already undermargined naked long positions in natural gas.
P.P.P.S. So, at this hour, the IMF and the U.S. Provost Marshal continue to order massive asset redemption and repatriation of collateralized assets aka precious and industrial metals.
Introduction
In closing, we can now directly report that after the freezing of the Deutsche Bank proprietary accounts that took place today, 12-12-12, the IMF is now prepared to fully implement the Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols with the Obama Administration absent.
Finally, it is time to buy the black gold and sell the yellow gold.
Deutsche Bank is down. OMG OMG Bye bye Bushes and shrubs
This is huge news people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The biggest bank that is in with the Fed scum bags has just been neutered. The Reagan Wanta Protocols are done. WOW WEE Public RV is around the corner.

And if you don't know what a Provost Marshall is this is from Wikipedia:


In the United States Army and United States Marine Corps, the senior military police officer is the Provost Marshal General (PMG) (Army) or Provost Marshal (USMC). The PMG was a post that was reinstated in 2003, having been abolished for 29 years. The PMG is in charge the United States Army Military Police CorpsU.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) and United States Army Corrections Command (ACC) policy and procedures from an office in The Pentagon.
The senior MP officer at the theater, corps, division, and brigade level and for each garrison is known as a provost marshal. In many US Army garrisons, a provost marshal is at times also responsible for the provision of fire and physical security as well as law enforcement services and thus is also referred to as the Director of Emergency Services.



Thursday, December 13, 2012

2ND BITE TO CHALLENGE OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY?

A longstanding eligibility case challenging Barack Obama’s presence in the White House soon could be headed to the state Supreme Court in Alabama, where one justice already in a court filing has questioned the authenticity of Obama’s documentation, and the incoming chief justice is a dyed-in-the-wool Constitution supporter with little tolerance for those who want to bypass the document.
The move is pending in an eligibility challenge brought by Hugh McInnish and others against the Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman.

Read more at 

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

The Blind Lead the Blind and both fall into the pit!

Sex charges rock Purpose Driven 'healthy church'.

For there shall be a time when they will not endure sound doctrine but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables.  2 Timothy 4


Read more a
t

 http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/sex-charges-rock-purpose-driven-healthy-church/#Jrdvw0AjKSP60m4u.99