Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 4600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Thursday, April 4, 2019

A little dust-up at Rumor Mill News


By Anna Von Reitz

Editors note:  We were contacted by one of the people at Rumor Mill News and offered the opportunity to respond to the following:  https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=120675
Here is Anna's response.
-----

The FBI, or more likely, the military, may very well be controlling the Michigan General Jural Assembly activities as a Controlled Opposition Operation --- trying to get us to form a "State of State" for their use and then gloss it over and pretend that its a "State" without explaining to anyone that it is only euphemistically a "State" as in "Confederate State". 

All the States of the Confederation were States of States ----- commercial corporations created to conduct commercial business for the States of the Federation.   "Federation and Con -Federation" equals "Unincorporated States of the Union and Incorporated States of States belonging to the States of the Union".   All the Territorial and Municipal States of States are Confederate "States" in the same sense. 

In my contacts with the Michigan General Jural Assembly (MGJA)  I was told at one point that the principle organizer, a man named Robert, had affiliation with General Douglas MacArthur's Staff.  MacArthur, of course, presided over the disaster in which the Japanese gained access to our gold stored in the Philippines. Robert made the right noises and shared some worthwhile insights, so I believed that MGJA was on the right track.  

Only later did I find out that they were including "US Citizens" as members and at that point, I addressed the problem. Just as I had tried to warn the Colorado Nine, I explained that "US Citizens" can't form an assembly for an actual geographically defined State, and if they do, they will be trespassing into our lawful jurisdiction and nothing they do will have any validity.  They will just get in trouble.  

The Federal Corporations both Territorial and Municipal allow for Dual Citizenship, but our States of the Union never have.  It is literally impossible for a US Citizen owing a citizenship obligation to the Federal Corporations to assemble one of our States.  At most, they can organize a Territorial or Municipal Confederate "State" ---- a State of State to operate as a commercial instrumentality of an actual State. 

I assume from Robert's associations that their intent was to create a new Territorial State of State to replace the existing structure ---- and therein lies the rub from the perspective of the existing incorporated Service Providers.  They have their own employees and "citizens" ---- either United States Citizens (Territorials) or Citizens of the United States (Municipals) creating new, competing franchises, new States of States that undermine the position of the existing States of States. 

That's how these groups get into so much trouble and are accused of being in "insurrection" and so forth.  It would be like working as an employee for Pepsi and at the same time, organizing production of Coca-Cola, or being a manager at Hormel while promoting Smithfield hams.  

There's an intrinsic conflict of interest that in political terms is interpreted as "insurrection" or even treason.  

If this is carried over into the kinds of activities that some of these groups have engaged in like forming "Committees of Safety" and acting like they are at war with their own employees, stockpiling weapons and "making contingency plans" and all that sort of thing, then it is not just talking or not liking your employer, it's taking shape as some kind of physical conflict among "US Citizens" ---a Civil War---  that serves nobody's best interests, including ours --- the actual States and People's. 

The British Territorial Corporation is under contract to protect this country and its people, so from that standpoint also, such activities on the part of "US Citizens" is not acceptable. 

So the British Territorials are obligated to crack down on such activities both in terms of "insurrection" against them and also "international terrorism" against us, the American States and People. 

The horrible irony is, of course, that most of these people are just innocent Americans, were never actually "US Citizens" of either stripe, and they are just trying to restore their lawful government without knowing how their lawful government is constructed nor how it is supposed to work nor how their own political status has been converted, so that before they can even begin to work on their lawful government's problems, they have to correct their own political status records. 

In order to restore our lawful unincorporated government, we have to act as unincorporated Lawful Persons --- as American State Nationals and American State Citizens standing on the land and soil of this country.  But thanks to FDR, we have all been "presumed" to be operating as Legal Persons and as "US Citizens" since 1933.  

It takes action on our parts to sever those legal presumptions and to correct the false registrations that have been concocted in support of those legal presumptions.  

What is so tough about this is that Americans have been indoctrinated to think of themselves as "US Citizens" and taught to accept that as their identity, when the vast majority of us have either (1) never actually been US Citizens, never had a federal job or been dependent on the federal government; or (2) were in the military for a couple years and honorably discharged and been under no obligation of US Citizenship since then--- but were never told and failed to recognize the fact that Americans are not "naturally" US Citizens.  

We are naturally American State Nationals.  American State Nationals and American State Citizens are owed all the Treaties and the guarantees of the Constitutions.  Our States are Parties to the Constitutions ---- "US Citizens" of both stripes, Territorial and Municipal --- are "presumed to be" just employees, foreigners, Brits or others, charged with providing the services our States agreed to receive. 

American State Nationals and State Citizens are the Landlords, the Owner-Operators, and US Citizens are Hired Help.  

That's why we can enforce the Constitutions and we can form up and assemble our actual States, but US Citizens cannot.  This is why we can access the guarantees and protections of the Constitutions and they cannot.  

And that is why it is absolutely necessary for people who are only "presumed to be" US Citizens--- all of us who are not actually military or Federal Civilian employees or dependents----  to do the paperwork and officially "return" from any presumed "US Citizenship" BEFORE assembling.  

State Nationals and State Citizens are guaranteed the right to peaceably assemble, but US Citizens of either kind have no such rights or guarantees, because they are operating in a different jurisdiction and capacity.  

I just posted an Article that explains the difference between living people, Lawful Persons (known collectively as People)  Legal Persons, and incorporated LEGAL PERSONS. 

As terribly as I have been misrepresented, misquoted, and deliberately slandered and libeled, I earnestly desire that innocent people wake up and avoid harm.  It's like the Prophet Amos said --- "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.".  Let the knowledge come.  Let it be spread, explained, understood, followed, so that none of the victims of this "System" come to more harm.  

The admonition to be "Wise as serpents and gentle as doves" was made for this time in history.  We must learn the knowledge of the "serpents" and use it against them, while remaining as gentle and peaceable as doves.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

For All The Jural Assemblies 46 -- No Pledges Ever


By Anna Von Reitz

We all grew up being exposed to "The Pledge of Allegiance" as schoolchildren.  We were indoctrinated from an early age to mindlessly recite something without knowing what it really meant.  

Start with the fact that a "Pledge" is a Feudal Oath given by a Serf or Tenant to a sovereign, promising "allegiance" another word from the feudal relationship vocabulary, subjecting yourself to the sovereign and promising to support and protect the sovereign.  

And what was standing in the "sovereign" position in "The Pledge of Allegiance"? 

The flag of something calling itself "the United States of America" --- they just didn't bother to tell anyone which United States of America.  

Most Americans have been kept from ever knowing that there are many different variations of both "United States" and "United States of America" and yes, it does matter which one you are talking about.  

There is the unincorporated version of The United States which refers to the sovereign soil jurisdiction State Republics and their "Union" formed in 1776, and there is the unincorporated version of The United States of America, our Holding Company formed September 9, 1776, which refers to the sovereign International Land Jurisdiction of the unincorporated States of the Union.  

These are the two entities that Americans naturally think of when someone says, "United States" or "United States of America", but in addition to these unincorporated entities that hold the land and soil jurisdictions of our country, there are other incorporated entities that are supposed to work for our States and People.  

These include two other "kinds" of United States and United States of America that operate in the Municipal jurisdiction of the the Holy Roman Empire and the International Jurisdiction of the Sea, respectively.  

These incorporated versions are "doing business names" of foreign corporations that are on our shores, purportedly to provide specified governmental services under the provisions of their respective Constitutions. 

Their "United States" which is actually "the United States, Inc." is run by the members of the Territorial Congress acting as the government of the Washington, DC Municipality, which is an independent international city state like Vatican City and the Inner City of London known as Westminster and more recently, New York City and the United Nations have made bold to become ---without our permission, separate international governments standing on the land and soil of New York.  

Time for the People of New York to wake up and put these Freebooters in their place, but that's another story.  

Right now, just take in the fact that "United States" in this context means the Municipal Government being run by the members of Congress as a "plenary oligarchy" that is only supposed to operate and exist within the ten miles square of the District of Columbia.  [Article I, Section 8, Clause 17]  

Also take note that when this version of incorporated foreign "United States" is being referenced, the definite article associated with it is not capitalized and not part of the name.  That is, our actual government's Proper Name is "The United States", while their strictly limited foreign Municipal government providing services "in our names" is "the" United States.  

The same sort of confusion occurs with "the" United States of America, which refers to the British Territorial service providers under contract to our States.  In the same way, the Proper Name of our unincorporated version is "The United States of America" and "The" is both capitalized and part of the name.  Their foreign incorporated version --- again --- is "the" United States of America. 

So when we look at their "Pledge of Allegiance" what do we see?  Which "United States of America" is being referenced?  Ours or the British version? 

We already know that a "Pledge" is a Feudal Oath and we know our Founders weren't into Feudalism, so we should not be surprised to observe that the Queen's subjects are pledging themselves to "the" United States of America via their Pledge of Allegiance to the Queen and the British Territorial corporation doing business as "the" United States of America. 

Read it and weep:  

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America" ---- this is the war flag of the British Territorial Commercial Corporation doing business "in our name" --- the United States of America, Inc. 

"and to the Republic for which it stands" -----   we got a passing mention and a presumed Dual Citizenship obligation thrown in.  

"one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all" ---- and the problem with this is?   (1) It isn't clear which "God" we are subjecting ourselves to; (2) they are just subcontractors and we owe them no more loyalty than they show us; (3) we, Americans, enjoy freedom, not "liberty" which is what British sailors get when they arrive in ports of call.  

As you can see, pledging is a British thing.  It has nothing to do with us, our American Government, or any natural obligation we have as Americans. 

Americans don't do pledges because we are sovereigns in our own right, and pledging to a foreign sovereign obligates us to serve them instead of serving our own sovereignty. 

So we never, ever, under any circumstance make "pledges" to anyone or anything, including the flag being flown "for" us by a British Territorial Corporation.  

Think of the insanity of what is being employed against us?  A living man subjects himself to an inanimate symbol like a flag?  Can you think of a worse form of idolatry?  

This innocent-sounding "pledge" disrespects all three major western religions. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all forbid the worship of idols. 

Yet, here we have had generations of clueless American schoolchildren -- and adults, too--- pledging their lives and substance to an inanimate object, an idol,  being used under contract by a British Territorial Commercial Corporation as a war flag.  

Needless to say, this venal and undisclosed practice of "pledging" has to stop and it has to be known and repudiated by any and every thinking man and woman in this country.  

No sentient Christian, Jew, or Muslim can ever take such a pledge, nor should they.  

If you do knowingly ever take a "pledge" of any kind, be aware that whatever you are "pledging" is encumbered and that whatever you are "pledging to" becomes the ruler over you.  

Do you want to be ruled over by a war flag being borrowed from our actual government by a British Territorial Commercial Company operating out of Puerto Rico under Spanish Law and calling itself "the United States of America"?  

Didn't think so, but had to ask, because that is what happens when you recite "The Pledge of Allegiance".  

Much of what we have been told in Public Schools across America and also taught to accept and to do, is wrong, or a half truth, or a sin by omission leading us to make wrong assumptions to our detriment.  

This is just one particularly evil example of betrayal of our trust. 

As American State Jural Assembly members we never take pledges.  We operate in our capacity as Lawful Persons and the only sovereign State we serve is our own.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

It Is Simple, Mr. Trump


By Anna Von Reitz

Return our National Credit to us, which is your National Debt. 

That will cancel that portion of the Debt, set you free of it, and let us all get on with our lives. 

Because we never received the equitable payment we were owed it became a debt for the US and a credit for the actual States and People. 

Via discredited unconscionable contracts and false claims the United States has contrived to deny the American States and People the credit and other assets we are owed. 

The United States, Inc. and the United States of America, Inc, have both lied through their teeth to prevent us from accessing and claiming what we are simply owed as the actual landlords of this country. 

The fraud and the deceits are discovered.  There is no way for Washington or London or Rome to hide it anymore. 

So move our National Credit off the books of the DOD and give it back to The United States of America--- the unincorporated version, because We and our States are Parties to the Constitution and we earned it all. 

Tell the Queen and Pope Francis that we are back home, alive and well, and not pleased by this ongoing stalemate and avoidance of the facts. 

We are also displeased by the scandalous abuse of our banking system, most especially the abuse documented at HSBC by John Cruz and the abuse of Attorney Escrow Accounts and especially the abuse of our identities and personal data by these banks to create phony debt, phony tax claims, and to launder money. 

These abuses must stop and these banks and securities corporations must be brought to bay, even if it means a military take-over and nationalization of the banks and securities industries under the auspices of our lawful restored American Government. 

Please note that our States are competent to enforce the Constitutions and to act independently in trade or commerce with or without appointing new Federal-level States of States. 

That is, the absence of Federal entities exercising delegated powers in no way hinders the delegators of those powers from exercising those same powers in our own behalf. 

It's time we all had a frank and honest conversation about these issues.  May we suggest that Lancaster County in Pennsylvania is neutral ground, centrally located, and lovely this time of year? 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Why So MUCH Confusion?


By Anna Von Reitz

I have said this simply and repeated it often:

The only kind of "State" a "US Citizen" can form is a Confederate State.  All Confederate States are in fact Commercial Corporations that operate as States of States. 

So when you have "US Citizens" running around forming "State" Assemblies, this actually and factually means that they are forming "State of State" Assemblies--and new commercial corporations. 

And what does such a new "State of State" compete with? ---The established State of State organizations.  

This is why the Federales rightly consider such US Persons to be in "insurrection" against their States of States. 

There is no way to create a new Territorial State of State or Municipal STATE OF STATE without being in competition against the ones that exist already.  

Likewise, US Citizens can't reconstruct the missing Federal States of States.  Why not? 

Because only the actual States can recharter those organizations. That is our job. 

The actual States are the employers of the States of States, so not only are the States of States not threatened by the return of their employers, they have nothing to say about their employer's peaceable process of Assembly, which is guaranteed under the Constitution to the States and the People.  

But in order to be owed these guarantees and to assemble a lawful State we must be operating as Lawful People and adopting no duty or responsibility but that of State Nationals and State Citizens. 

The States and People who are the employers of the States of States are not in competition with them and not even in the same jurisdiction with them, so it is impossible to claim that we, Americans, are in any way operating in insurrection against our own government or acting in competition with or in insurrection against any State of State or franchise belonging to the Territorial or Municipal United States Government 

We occupy our own sphere as they are also obligated to inhabit their own. 

So now, hopefully, you can all clearly see why it is a big No-No and a crime for anyone acting as a US Citizen to form a competing State of State--- they already owe their loyalty to the existing corporations. 

Hopefully it is also clear why American State Citizens engaged in assembling an actual State are working on a whole different level and under constitutional guarantees to assemble the States that in fact employ the States of States. 

We aren't in competition with or even acting in the same jurisdiction as any state of state commercial corporation. 

Those of you who have followed my instructions and done and recorded your paperwork are in this second group of "Assemblies" -----forming a lawful Assembly engaged in manifesting a sovereign unincorporated State of the Union as one of the People of this great country, owed every jot of the constitutional guarantees--including the right to peaceably assemble.

Those who refuse to do the paper work and make the proper Declarations remain US Citizens ---and US Citizens are not protected nor enabled to participate in any assembly process. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Montana Governor Steve Bullock Moves Toward Gun Control

Bullock wants to be President, and he thinks he has nothing to lose by now  coming out of the closet on gun control. Just another sleazy politician who hid his real views from the people who elected him and now does whatever is expedient to get himself elected. Can anyone spell BACKFIRE.



Found here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74I8O9hLzpM

Dana Loesch on Montana Governor Steve Bullock's move toward gun control: "It's a typical, slimy, unprincipled, political move. It's so swamp. And the worst part: Democrats will let him get away with it, so long as he kisses all the right anti-gun rings." —Dana Loesch

You are going to crash and burn over this one in Montana Mr. Bullock. You might just as well leave the state right now. You have committed political suicide in Montana.
Paul Stramer