Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Friday, May 27, 2016

Judge in International Capacity, Justice at Home --- Unanswered Letters 18 -- for Patriot Jenn


by Anna Von Reitz

The Alaska State Superior Court is the "undelegated" side of the Alaska State Court, which the people are owed under The Alaska Statehood Compact----otherwise, the Compact would be both illegal and unlawful.  The two sides of the court can be invoked separately and in fact have to be invoked separately.  

To better understand this remember that the actual Constitution delegated only nineteen strictly enumerated functions to the "Federal Government"---all in the international jurisdiction of the sea.  Article X reserved all other undelegated rights, duties, functions and prerogatives in all jurisdictions including the jurisdiction of the sea, either to the states (meaning the states on the land) or the people of the land.  

More Disinfo and Hogwash --- Unanswered Letters 17 --- For "Highly"

In answer to reports on NESARA Blogspot that "US Corp: Today, the House will act to take back Congress's Powers Under the Constitution"-----


Judge Anna says ---- disinformation and hogwash.  

How can a foreign "Congress" acting as a Board of Directors of a foreign corporation and as oligarchs operating a foreign "union of states" --- the Insular States and DC plus fifty Federated "States" operating in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea as a democracy without a mandate--- switch its spots and pretend to represent the people and the jurisdiction of the land of these United States? 

It can't, is the answer.

This issue was settled over 200 years ago:   Naturalization Act, Seventh Congress, Session I, Chapter 28, Sections 1-4, April 14, 1802,  sets out the requirements for anyone, including people born in one of the nation states of the Union, to become a United States Citizen.

Hague Notice of Fraud, Order to Cease and Desist


by Anna Von Reitz

Dear Friends, 

Last night all Hell broke loose--- but in a good sense.  For many years people have sought to determine the source, meaning, and implications of the use of all capital letter naming conventions.  Why should such a name as "JOHN HENRY DOE" exist?  How is it different from "John Henry Doe"?   Or "john henry doe" for that matter?  

I have researched it and written memorandums on the results that show that the use of these different "styles" were used in Ancient Roman Civil Law as a means of distinguishing between free men, bondservants, and slaves, with the "john henry doe" stile indicating a free man, and "John Henry Doe" indicating a bondservant, and "JOHN HENRY DOE" indicating a slave. 

The implications of this ancient history taken together with the circumstance surrounding the end of the Civil War (with millions of freed slaves representing "abandoned property" at least to some criminally minded members of the Congress) and the adoption of the 14th Amendment to the Corporate "Constitution" in 1868 and "corporate citizenship" with it----- are obvious without a degree in rocket science.  

Reply for Tony --- Unanswered Letters 16 -- No, Not Like Karen Hudes in Any Respect


by Anna Von Reitz

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Tony wrote:

Dear Mr Stramer,
I have read a letter (linked to your site) concerning a debt transmittal letter as written by Anna Von Reitz.

Near the end, she writes "I am also.....authorizing the transfer of credit from our trust accounts to cover all debts of UNITED STATES, INC. This...."

I have tried to listen to her debates with karen hudes with much frustration. It seems both women want the same thing but each wants to be the boss who lets the world banking cartel off the hooks free and clear. Neither will concede it is not their money to give to anybody. However, both seem to be the self-appointed spokespersons for their cause.

Years ago, I first read the words re-told recently on a video about a story concerning Davy Crockett giving some money away that was not his to give (and he did it without permission & on his own accord). It seems that both these women need to sit side-by-side and mutually work out their ego differences and Get 'er done! A thought crosses my mind wondering who died and left them in charge. It sure was not Davy Crockett or he would have left notes on how not to spend other people's money.

I have been actively involved in this same movement since 1999. Never spent a penny of someone else's money without their consent and encouragement. Yes, I am a free man and do not need a woman to tell me so, but am willing to listen to thoughtful suggestions -- never edicts.

No need for name calling. No need for fights. State your rightful claim. Stand your ground.

Sincerely,
Tony

And here is Anna's answer: