Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2500 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Challenge for Daryl R Anderson Sheriff of Lincoln County Montana

Are you going to block manditory vaccination for H1N1 in Lincoln County Montana or are you going to let the feds run your department once again?

Monday, September 21, 2009

THE STORY BEHIND THE MONTANA FREEMEN

This article is one man's opinion on many of the questions about who the "freemen" are and what they knew.  I could not find the name of the Author, but the article is in the public domain. 
Read this article and you will realize why the Feds had to silence these men, keep them from telling the public what they discovered and destroy the evidence of those discoveries. Editor's note.

THE STORY BEHIND THE MONTANA FREEMEN IS ONE OF THE MOST INTERESTING AND IMPORTANT STORIES OF THE CENTURY !!!

Author Unknown. Published in 2002. Public Domain, see the link at the end.

The Revolutionary War was fought for one purpose and one end and that is SOVEREIGNTY ! After the war, the colonies were each separate and Independant countries and still are today. Every FREEMAN 21 years of age or older who owned land and was able to vote was a king in his own home. He was untaxable. His land was untaxable and his income was untaxable. Nobody can tax the King, the King is Sovereign. The FREEMEN of MONTANA had long ago renounced their U.S. citizenship status in favor of being an American National (Different From a State Citizen, But Similar). They severed all contracts with the government so they would not be under it’s jurisdiction. The U.S. government is a Foreign Corporation with respect to a state. A corporation cannot have citizens, only franchises. When you except a social security # or you register to vote , you elect to be a U.S citizen, which the courts have ruled is of SUBJECT STATUS, Not SOVEREIGN.

I could not find the name of the Author, but the whole article is in the public domain at:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2511514/The-Story-Behind-the-Montana-Freemen-is-One-of-the-Most-Interesting-and-Important-Stories-of-the-Century

I have also published a verbatim copy at: http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/storyofmontanafreemen.htm

See another copy with a prologue at:  http://www.freedomdomain.com/Catalog/catalog2.html

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

The Law That Never Was ! Income Tax law NEVER RATIFIED?

Bill Benson's Case going to the Supreme Court of the United States after over 20 years. Your help is needed.

Do you think you will ever see this on Glenn Beck?
Background:  Bill Benson working with Montana's own Red Beckman, travelled to all 48 States involved in the ratification process of the 16th Amendment, (the income tax amendment) and collected from the archives of those state legislatures over 17 thousand (17,000) certified (notarized) documents proving once and for all that the 16th Amendment was never ratified. Bill and Red then published a large hardbound book called "The Law That Never Was" in which they outlined the process they followed to get that certified evidence, and some of the evidence itself.
Bill has spent over two decades trying to get that evidence in front of the American People. He is a true American Patriot and has sacrificed everything, including spending time in jail over these issues. See the story below from his Consitututional  Attorney Jeff Dickstein as related by Devvy Kidd.

BENSON GOES TO SUPREME COURT FOR ALL OF US
By: Devvy
September 21, 2009
© 2009 - NewsWithViews.com

"Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions." -- James Madison, essay in the National Gazette, March 27, 1792

Over the years, I have written about many court battles. Bill Benson's has been going on for many years and now is headed to the U.S. Supreme Court. For those not familiar with his case, it is about the First Amendment. It is about YOUR First Amendment rights. This is one of the most important First Amendment cases to go to the U.S. Supreme Court in the last 100 years. The government's arguments in this case have been so frivolous as to border on absurd. The lower courts have deliberately ignored the main issues because they don't wan to deal with this and that is why it now must go before the "high" court:

"In this historic 16th Amendment litigation, the Government has sued Bill Benson seeking an injunction prohibiting him from falsely telling people the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was not ratified and therefore people are not required to file an income tax return. The Government contends it is entitled to an injunction because Benson is promoting an abusive tax shelter, conduct made subject to a penalty per 26 U.S.C. Section 6700."

This case isn't about tax evasion or "paying your fair share." Benson has never promoted any form of abusive tax shelters. It is about the First Amendment. It is about oppressive government deciding they can change the language of the First Amendment to suit their own totalitarian needs. It is about real men who have sacrificed their freedom (Bill Benson), good times and forget getting paid big legal fees (Becraft and Dickstein) the whole way to stand and fight for what is right. Now, we must fight with them with our support.

Read the whole article here:  http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd469.htm

See the whole Red Beckman lecture here: http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/jury.html

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

CAMP FEMA - Will you go quietly?

AMERICAN LOCKDOWN: Evidence of Internment Camps in America

Recent legislation attempting to legitimize the use of internment camps to detain U.S. citizens in the event of an uprising or civil unrest has many people asking what nation they live in.

In a country born out of political dissent, we watch our leaders in Washington slowly pass bills that label ordinary Americans as thought criminals and potential domestic terrorists for simply questioning the actions of their government. We see third party candidates and their impassioned supporters listed in secret government reports that call their allegiance into question and brand them as fanatics and extremists.

Senate committee hearings and official FBI documents further illustrate the mindset of our elected officials as they classify homeschoolers, gun rights activists and anti-abortionists as threats against the existing social and political order; by default creating an entire nation of radicals and revolutionaries - where everyone is a suspect… equally guilty until proven otherwise.





How has our government shown that they will deal with these people? The same way as every other totalitarian regime throughout history - marginalize their activities then lock them up. Prisons are being built; internment camps constructed and laws passed that deal severely with anyone who dares to step out of line or ask too many questions.

Who are the potential domestic terrorists that will end up in these camps? Read the documentation for yourself and hear what our experts have to say. States rights take a front row seat in this new political thriller that is guaranteed to send shivers up your spine. Find out where the true power of the people rests in halting these treasonous activities NOW!
Get the whole 90 minute video here: http://campfema.com/

IS YOUR SHERIFF KEEPING HIS OATH? How is he keeping it?

Sheriffs Begin Revolt Against Federal Authority
by Sheriff Mack

YouTube
Sat, Sep 19th, 2009 12:00:00 am

More info visit: http://www.sheriffmack.com/



From Sheriff Mack


Hi, I'm Richard Mack, former sheriff of Graham County, Arizona, and long-time crusader for freedom and individual rights. Right now, it is vital that we restore the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. The greatest threat we face today is not terrorists; it is our own federal government. If America is conquered or ruined it will be from within, not a foreign enemy.

In 1994 I filed a lawsuit challenging the Brady bill to stop the federal government from forcing another unfunded mandate down our throats. I won a decision at the US Supreme Court on the issue of States' rights. This suit catapulted me to national attention, with television appearances on the Donahue Show, Good Morning America, Crossfire, Nightline, CNBC, and SHOWTIME'S the AMERICAN CANDIDATE. I've been on over 500 radio talk shows nationwide, ranging from G. Gordon Liddy and Charles Goyette to Derry Brownfield and Pat Buchannan. I have traveled the country extensively and I've seen first hand the horrible side effects from politicians who have replaced our Constitution with their own political agendas and party platforms.

I lecture and give seminars on constitutional issues relating to gun control, law enforcement, States' rights, the farce, otherwise known as the drug war, and the oath of office. I have also been a consultant for lawyers, and people in general helping them with cases of unlawful arrests and police misconduct. I have stood for "the little guy" against "big brother" government.

On this site you'll find many articles and extracts from books I've written on many subjects related to maintaining our freedom as a people. I am deeply committed to the belief that government should exist to protect the freedoms of the individuals whom it serves. We must return to those principles that our country was founded upon!

The founders of our nation were afraid of one thing more than any other... government having too much power! Remember, they escaped from the tyranny of an oppressive and controlling government when they established this nation. They fought and died for it, and now we are letting these same freedoms they fought for slip away little by little, without a second thought.

Please join me in the fight to regain our rights, while the price to pay is less than death. I am committed to doing all we can peacefully to get our country back.

In order to succeed, we must first make ourselves aware of the problem. We must educate ourselves, and then we can know what action to take. One of the best and easiest solutions is to depend on local officials, especially the sheriff, to stand against federal intervention and federal criminality.

And this is the purpose of my work: I write and speak so that others will become educated and free.

What rights does the constitution actually guarantee?
Why is it important that we not allow our means of self-defense to be taken from us?
What are the dangers of giving government too much power?
What can we do to remain strong as individuals and families, so that we can remain strong as a nation?
How do we win the war on illegal drugs?
What can the sheriff do to protect us from all enemies, both foreign and domestic?

Please take a few moments to read and think about these things. It really may be a life or death situation!

More info visit: http://www.sheriffmack.com/

Who is convicted felon (in France) GEORGE SOROS, and why should you care ?

Soros: Republic Enemy #1

by Jim O'Neill
Canadian Free Press
Sat, Sep 19th, 2009 12:00:00 am

Is it possible to lay the global financial meltdown, the radicalizing of the Democratic Party, and America’s moral decline, at the feet of one man?

It is indeed possible.

If George Soros isn’t the world’s preeminent “malignant messianic narcissist,” he’ll do until the real thing comes along. Move over, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. There’s a new kid on the block.

What we have in Soros, is a multi-billionaire atheist, with skewed moral values, and a sociopath’s lack of conscience. He considers himself to be a world class philosopher, despises capitalism, and just loves social engineering.

Uh oh. Can you say “trouble,” boys and girls?

Soros is a real life version of Dr. Evil—with Obama in the role of Mini-Me. Which is not as humorous as it might at first sound. In fact, it’s bone-deep chilling.

France has upheld an earlier conviction against Soros, for felony insider trading. Soros was fined 2.9 million dollars.

When the Democrats and Republicans held their conventions in 2000, Soros held Shadow Party conventions in the same cities, at the same time. Republican Senator John McCain was the keynote speaker at the “Soros Convention” (so labelled by the late Robert Novak) in Philadelphia.
Read the whole article here:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14700

Jim O'Neill'S Most recent columns  http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/14700/Jim%20ONeill/

Born in June of 1951 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Jim O’Neill proudly served in the U.S. Navy from 1970-1974 in both UDT-21 (Underwater Demolition Team) and SEAL Team Two. A member of MENSA, he worked as a commercial diver in the waters off Scotland, India, and the United States. In 1998 while attending the University of South Florida as a journalism student, O’Neill won “First Place” in the “Carol Burnett/University of Hawaii AEJMC Research in Journalism Ethics Award. The annual contest was set up by Carol Burnett with the money she won from successfully suing the National Enquirer for libel.
Jim can be reached at: Letters@canadafreepress.com

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

The Money Monopoly: How the Federal Reserve rips you off !

Ron Paul in the American Conservative Magazine

by Ron Paul
American Conservative Magazine
Fri, Sep 18th, 2009 12:00:00 am

Most Americans haven’t thought much about the strange entity that controls the nation’s money. Visitors to Washington can see the Federal Reserve’s palatial headquarters, the monetary parallel to the Supreme Court or the U.S. Capitol. We hear the Fed chairman testify to Congress, citing complex data, making predictions, and attempting to intimidate anyone who would take issue. He postures as master of the universe, completely knowledgeable and in control.


But how much do we really know about what goes on inside the Fed? Even with the newest round of bailouts, journalists had difficulty determining where the money was coming from and where it was headed. From its founding in 1913, secrecy and inside deals have been part of the way the Fed works.

It says that its job is to keep inflation in check. But this is like the car industry claiming to control road congestion. The Fed might attempt to stop the effects of inflation, namely rising prices. But under the old definition of inflation—an artificial increase in the supply of money and credit—the reason for its existence is to generate more, not less.

The banking industry has always had trouble with the idea of a free market that provides opportunities for both profits and losses. The first part, the industry likes. The second is another matter. That is the reason for the constant drive in American history toward the centralization of money, a trend that not only benefits the largest banks with the most to lose from a sound-money system, but also the government, which is able to use an elastic system as an alternative form of revenue support.

Whenever instability turns up, we see efforts to socialize the losses, but rarely do people question the source of instability. Economist Jesús Huerta de Soto places the blame on the institution of fractional-reserve banking. This is the notion that depositors’ money in use as cash may also be loaned out for speculative projects, then re-deposited. The system works as long as people do not attempt to withdraw their money all at once. In the face of such a demand, banks turn to other banks to provide liquidity. But when the failure becomes system-wide, they turn to government.

The core of the problem is the conglomeration of two distinct functions of a bank. The first is warehousing, whereby banks keep money safe and provide checking, ATM access, record keeping, and online payment, services for which consumers are traditionally asked to pay. The second service the bank provides is a loan service, seeking out investments and putting money at risk in search of return.

The institution of fractional reserves mixes these functions, such that warehousing becomes a source for lending. The bank loans out money that has been warehoused—and stands ready to use in checking accounts or other forms of checkable deposits—and that loaned money is deposited yet again in checkable deposits. It is loaned out again and deposited, with each depositor treating the loan money as an asset on the books. In this way, fractional reserves create new money, pyramiding it on a fraction of old deposits. An initial deposit of $1,000, thanks to this “money multiplier,” turns into $10,000. The Fed adds reserves to the balances of member banks in the hope of inspiring ever more lending.
Continue Reading
http://amconmag.com/article/2009/oct/01/00032/

Friday, September 18, 2009

Are the active Military the only true Patriots?

Below is a comment posted by a friend of my son

(who currently serves with the Montana N.G. Air force) in which he (Sean) (after some earlier back and forth comments in which he (Sean) went on the attack and after doing so, Garrett (my son) asked
the question if Sean thought that those in the armed forces were the only patriots. Sean then spun this question into the following statement:

Sean Keighley

I was just told that a veteran isn't any more of a patriot to his country than someone who goes to a rally and protests. Anyone else think that way? Was my time in Afghanistan a waist? Should i have just gone to the courthouse and yelled throug...h a bull horn that i wanted the bad men to go away? Does that even out? Please comment on your thoughts...

This was my (Jeff)response:

Since I was also in the picture I guess I'm one of the "haters" too.

So I reluctantly enter this discussion.
Seeing as word Patriot has ruffled some feathers. Let's start with how it is defined in the dictionary

Patriot:
1. a person who loves, supports, and defends his or her country and its interests with devotion.

2. a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, esp. of individual rights, against presumed interference by the federal government.

3. (initial capital letter) Military. a U.S. Army anti-aircraft missile with a range of 37 mi. (60 km) and a 200-lb. (90 kg) warhead, launched from a tracked vehicle with radar and computer guidance.

No where in this definition does it mention that a soldier is the supreme patriot as you & others seem to suggest.

Only you are qualified to answer your question if going to Afghanistan was a waste of your time. I'm glad it is something you are proud of. So, perhaps there's your answer.

While I agree Bin Laden is a bad man, and should be pursued and brought to justice. He and his group are not the ONLY threat to the Our freedom (the Constitution).

If you go to the link below and Click on "Freedom Index" in the 4th paragraph. ... Read More

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance178.html

You will find (according to this organization) that in the 111th Congress only 3 Congressmen and 1 Senator have a 100% voting record in accordance with the Constitution.

That's 461 of 465 Elected Represenitives who dishonor the very Oath they Swore to Protect.

Seeing as it is the Constitution & Bill of Rights that best defends the concept of Individual Liberty (Freedom) I choose to fight this attack on freedom on the home front. I attempt to do so through peaceful demonstration, hopefully exposing the corruption within our own government in the attempt to get "We the People" involved in the process of returning this country back to it's proper role.

I Do salute your voluntary service to country, but I do not accept your dismissal of the importance of what we, and others, are trying to do.

I would like to leave you with a recent video from Adam Kokesh who served in the Marines & has currently thrown his name in the hat to run as a congressman in New Mexico.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk8ADLLYgqM

So anyhow gang I'm looking for are some opinions on my response. I will in No way be offended if you tell me I was out of line.

Thanks, Jeff

TIME Magazine Interviews Congressman Ron Paul

Fri, Sep 18th, 2009 12:00:00 am


Ron Paul answers many popular questions which include auditing / ending the Federal Reserve, the War on Drugs, censorship during the 2008 Presidential Election, and more.

Audit the FED now BULLET PROOF

Ron Paul: Audit the Fed Hits 290 Co Sponsors

Thu, Sep 17th, 2009 12:00:00 am


Dr. Paul makes the announcement himself at the Campaign For Liberty conference going on now in Valley Forge, PA

A REAL STATESMAN RUNNING FOR OFFICE. See the contrast.

Here is a video of Adam Kokesh, who is running for Congress in New Mexico.
See how a real candidate speaks to his potential constituents from the 3rd district of New Mexico.



He could easily win this and here is his website   http://kokeshforcongress.com/

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Why Do We Fear the Word Militia? What Does it Mean Anyway? And Who is Feeding you this FEAR?

The Word on the Street about anything associated with "Militia" was that it is "Anti-Government" - well what exactly is that? Does that mean you don't agree with all the Government Tells you, asks of YOU, Flat Out Demands of You.. I don't know anyone that agrees with EVERYTHING the Government Does, so I guess everyone is, well, Anti-Government.

So does Anti-Government mean some sort of Fear to the People, that some group of Psycho Vigilante Citizens is going to overthrow local government? Like What, the Commissioners, .. the Governor.. maybe the Mayor? I mean Really.


What is the Real Fear to all this?

Read the whole article here:  http://www.eurekamontananews.com/2009/09/why-do-we-fear-word-militia-what-does.html

LINE OF SUCCESSION IF OBAMA/SOETORO REMOVED FROM OFFICE

If our Constitution is to have any legitimacy, Obama/Soetoro must be removed from office. It doesn't matter if a long form birth certificate is produced that can be independently authenticated which shows he was born in Kenya, Kansas or Hawaii -- it is his father's status that makes Obama/Soetoro forever ineligible. He was born with dual citizenship and no amount of lies, twisting the truth with silliness about his mother 'gifting' citizenship to her son can change that one fact. Should an authentic birth certificate prove he was born in Kenya, that will further cement what millions know: Obama/Soetoro is a master liar who has shamelessly manipulated the American people for his own gain.

By: Devvy September 17, 2009
Read it all here:  http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd468.htm

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

YOU HAVE THE POWER TO CONTROL GOVERNMENT RIGHT NOW!

You were not taught this in the government school you attended!

Go to http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/jury.html

PATRIOTS: TIME FOR MAJOR PUSH ON USURPER'S CITIZENSHIP ISSUE

By: Devvy
September 15, 2009
© 2009 - NewsWithViews.com

On September 12, 2009, Americans descended on Washington, DC., in one of the largest displays of citizen disgust towards government in the history of this republic. While this patriotic day of fed up Americans was happening, the usurper (Obama/Soetoro) made sure he was out of town. As usual. Obama aka Soetoro has taken a real fondness to flying around on Air Force One with his inventory of teleprompters and stable of fawning sycophants.

Let's back up one day to September 11, 2009. The flim flam man was at the Pentagon with his militant, Marxist wife and bag lady of fashion, Michelle. The annual ceremony for those murdered on 9/11. At the same time in a court room in Georgia, Obama's lackeys were playing more games in an important case. Americans keeping up on current events know there have been dozens of lawsuits challenging the citizenship eligibility of this guy in the White House who has used five different names (Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham) and concealed every single record of his life except what he wants you to see.

For more reading and links go to the following websites.

http://www.newswithviews.com:80/Devvy/kidd467.htm

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

Monday, September 14, 2009

Why continue to use worthless paper as money?

The Patriotic and Moral Imperative for Owning Gold and Silver
by Johnny Silver Bear

Practically all of the problems in our country can be attributed to the continuing subjugation of the U.S. Constitution. (The constitution mandates only Gold and Silver coin as legal tender.)  Had the remedies for such actions, which are provided in the text of the Constitution, been applied, many of our former, (as well as current), leaders would have been prosecuted and removed from public office. One of the main reasons that the American people have allowed the wholesale dismantling of their freedoms and liberties stems from the effectiveness of the all pervasive misinformation campaign that has been waged for over 100 years. We are not being shepherded by altruistic wise men, but, rather, herded by megalomaniacal desperadoes.

"If one half of one percent of Americans each went out and bought ten ounces of silver, that would amount to 14,000,000 ounces of silver. COMEX has much less than 100,000,000 ounces of silver available. That much buying pressure would have an explosive effect on the price. This could force the hand of the cartel and help change the world for the better."

Kenneth Parsons, aka Johnny Silver Bear, is an IT professional in Texas and the President of Silver Bear Communications, Inc. Mr. Parsons has been involved in the advertising and promotion industry for over twenty-five years. He is the editor of the Silver Bear Cafe and, as such, is responsible for shaping the content of "The Bear." Mr. Parsons has served as CEO for Fiberscape Communications, Inc., a web site development / hosting and streaming multi-media company in Richardson, Texas since 1997. He is a Jeffersonian and a passionate supporter of the U.S. Constitution. He is also an outspoken advocate of gold money and equal tax rates. You can contact Mr. Parsons with questions or comments via email.

Read the whole article here: http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/02.09/ipledge.html

Sunday, September 13, 2009

For the Real Numbers on the DC ralley!

Go here and watch the movies and see the real crowds. Some estimate as high as 2 Million.
Certainly many more than Martin Luther Kings famous "I have a dream" speech which was estimated at over 200,000.

http://www.voteronpaul.com/newsDetail.php?Massive-Corporate-Media-Coverup-of-Real-Numbers-at-D.C.-Rally-2215

The spark that has triggered rebellion
by Ellen Sauerbrey  "American Thinker"

 http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/the_spark_that_has_triggered_r.html

Genocide with H1N1 virus?

Legislative Freedom to conduct Genocide.

Nature, Accident, or Biological Warefare?

Watch these videos and make up your own mind.



What the Montana Freemen knew. Money as Debt!

Do you want to understand the FRAUD in the money system?

This movie tells some of what Leroy Schweitzer, a so called "Montana Freeman" knew that put him in jail for fourteen years. Did the so called "Freemen" get a fair trial?

I don't know, but I will show some history and let you make up your own mind. Did the mainstream media report the whole story? I have my doubts. Did the so called "Freemen" get to present their evidence? Definitely not. They surrendured precisely to avoid any loss of life or injury under the agreement their evidence would be preserved and they would have their day in court to present their evidence of FRAUD in the money system, a fact that is becomming very well known now, and talked about on mainstream media by Ron Paul and many others.



All the evidence that would have made Schweitzer's defence in court was supposed to be safeguarded by then state legislator Karl Ohs, on his promise to preserve those computer disks and hard copy.

When it came time for the trial in Billings the evidence was no longer available, and Karl Ohs received an award from the FBI for his "help" in the matter.

Here is what his Bio says about it.

"Lieutenant Governor Karl Ohs is widely known for his role in peacefully ending the Freeman standoff near Jordan, Montana. In 1996, at the request of the FBI, he served as principal negotiator, making 19 separate trips into the Freeman compound. His involvement earned him the 1998 Lou Peters Award given by the FBI for public service."

The Montana legislature recently also praised Karl Ohs for his service to Montana. One has to ask if the legislators knew the whole story?

Here is just a sample of some of the information from Leroy Schweitzer himself and from the Militia of Montana at the time.

-----BEGIN MESSAGE-----


To Patriots and concerned Americans,

The following report was released today by the Militia of Montana, concerning what actually happened at the hearing held during the third week of July, 1996. Alot of unsubstantiated stories are being spread about. Hopefully, the truth about what is going on will soon be known.

================================================================

Militia of Montana

P.O. Box 1486, Noxon, MT 59853
Tel: 406-847-2735
Fax: 4O6-847-2246
Internet: http://www.militiaofmontana.com/

JULY 25, 1996
PERSONAL LETTER FROM LeRoy SCHWEITZER

(Editor's Note: Because of the amount of controversy that has erupted over the information released by Patriot Media personalities the following letter is being released. This letter was written on July 22, 1996, by

LeRoy Schweitzer and Ralph Clark to Randy Scott of Noxon, Montana. The text of the letter explains to Randy what exactly took place at the now "infamous" hearings before Judge Burns of Portland, Oregon over the third week of July 1996. The letter was hand-written and has been typed by Randy Trochmann (co-founder M.O.M.) for easier reading word for word, spelling for spelling, emphasis for emphasis.

Following LeRoy's and Ralph's letter to Randy is a statement we received from U.S. Attorney Sherry Matteucci. Judge Brown's office would not comment on the hearings.

The "Schweitzer Transcript -- Jul 17, 1996" is available from Michel's Reporting Service, P.O. Box 20577 Billings, MT 59104 for $45.00. It is approximately 60 pages for those interested.)

"twenty-second day, seventh month

Dear brother Randy,

The day you were at the visitor's window I had numerous items and family to review so we did miss our voice transfer of events; nevertheless it was a grand day of our former tradition in Law, Full well recognized by the executive bearing officer James M. Burns in our judicial Branch of self-government.

If you had not heard it before, James M. Burns stated in open Court quote `I want the attornies to see the whites of the eyes of the Judges.' There were six large yellow placards on our bench (table) with our last names --- somewhat a misnomer but still in compliance with their 'Criminal Justice

Reform' as found In 28 USC & 18 USC 1994 ed., Burns gave a lengthy story of the Dred Scott cases, a speech by Abraham Lincoln and another quote by someone on the ignorance of the People is such a waste upon a Nation lying asleep, he finally asked me to write an Order for release. A seven page `Protective Order of Release" was done the very next day being served today.

It is now a recognized fact we are the King's bench in Billings, Montana state.

The next day Daniel C.; Petersen brought up the fact we would enter a 'Peace Bond' into Court, whereupon the `feds' called a recess and all our People were brought back to the jail, Ralph Edwin and William Lee; Stanton were never taken back for any further lien hearings. By reading the Code sections I have discovered the method to transfer for want of jurisdiction into our exclusive original jurisdiction, where no corporation nor attorney can speak We have successfully crossed this `bar' causing the `feds' to lose their presumption of an action. I full well expect a timely release,.

The goons never stop their crimes however and did screw up once again by breaking Dale's thumb, More commercial paper with subsequent bank takeover. Will they never learn? The former mighty whore of Babylon in its final throes.

Praise our Father Yhvh from whom all Blessings of liberty flow to the remnant People, We have won through this phase of the battle, now the magnitude of teaching the lost sheep. All is well here at the inn; we will be on the other side soon. Keep your faith, our prayers were heard. with love - - your brothers

Ralph Edwin and LeRoy Michael"

(Editor's Note: The following is a comment to John Trochmann from the U.S. Attorney's office, Billings, Montana concerning the hearing.)

"An erroneous misinterpretation as to what occurred in the court room. There are no plans to release any of the Freemen. We are proceeding with the trial as scheduled."

(Editor's Note: Calls were made to the U.S. Marshals office requesting any information on release papers for the Freemen. They stated they had not receive any release process orders from the court. One last note, the Court Reporter stated "Judge Burns did not turn over the court to Mr. Schweitzer.")

With the above letter and comments by the Justice Department our only other source will be the transcript. However, some will believe the transcript to be altered from what was really said. If that is the case then you will have to judge for yourself what really took place.

Our own observation concerning Judge Burns and the hearing has led us to believe that LeRoy and the rest of the Freemen may be tricked into giving the court personal jurisdiction. As patriots who have fought their own battles in the court system can attest to, most judges and lawyers are willing to do anything they can to get you to grant the court jurisdiction.

We pray that LeRoy keeps his arguments pure and not be tricked. There has been talk that we now have to wait to see if the court will honor LeRoy's orders. If LeRoy's perception of the hearing is correct, the court will honor his directives. If his perception is wrong, then it won't. It's pretty cut-and-dried. LeRoy is either right in his comment, "It is now a recognized fact that we are the King's bench in Billings, Montana state,"
or, he is not. Only time will tell.

Concerning the "Certified Money Orders" we have learned that an individual in Michigan is being charged for fraud using Schweitzer's "Bankers Checks." What is so interesting about this case is that he is charged for only "half the amount of the check". He owed the IRS $70,000. The check was written out for $140,000 with a demand for refund of overpayment. The fraud charge is for the extra $70,000 and not the $70,000 owed to the IRS-- which they kept.. The refund demanded from the IRS was in lawful United States Money.

A U.S. Treasury Check is lawful money. What the gentleman from Michigan had done was send the IRS a Freemen Money Order (a piece of paper), worth nothing, and asking for substance in return (U.S. Treasury Check); this constitutes fraud.

We have said it before and we will say it again. If the Freemen are guilty then so is the Federal Reserve. This is exactly what the Federal Reserve does every day. It issues paper notes worth nothing to the Federal(government in return for substance (U.S. Treasury Check or Bond). This is why the government is dead-broke and in bankruptcy. This is also the reason why the fruits of our labor (substance) is taxed.

However, two wrongs do not make a right. If the Freemen have accomplished nothing else, they have accomplished exposing the fraud of the Federal Reserve by making a mockery out of the entire system it is based upon.

We will continue to watch the hearings and assist in any way we can in exposing the truth and lies for what they really are.

One last note: As of July 25, 1996 the Freemen who refuse to be fingerprinted or photographed as part of routine booking in the Yellowstone County Jail have had all privileges suspended until they cooperate. They will have no television, no phone calls, no visits and no candy bars fromthe canteen until they cooperate according to the jail commander, Capt. Dennis McCave.

Shame on them for treating Justice's from the King's bench this way!!!

Militia of Montana
we are everywhere

========================================================================

Militia of Montana
http://www.militiaofmontana.com/

permission to reprint granted if entire message is left intact.

Glenn

Freemen evidence taken by Feds.
http://www.iahushua.com/T-L-J/evident.html

Federal abuses of Montana Freemen continued

http://www.iahushua.com/T-L-J/freeaid.html#LIARS

After reading all this do you really think you were given the real story by the mainstream media about the so called "Freemen" ?

Stay tuned for more opinion and background on this.

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The video is third party and not covered by this legal notice.

When law enforcement breaks the law is your county really safe?

Ex-sergeant charged in ammo case

by JOHN CRAMER - Ravalli Republic
A former Ravalli County sheriff’s sergeant was charged Friday with stealing more than 40,000 rounds of ammunition from the department.

Jeff Fowler, who was fired in July following an internal investigation that linked him to the crime, is slated to appear Oct. 1 in Ravalli County District Court on one count of felony theft.

Read the article here:  http://www.ravallirepublic.com/articles/2009/09/11/news/news35.txt

The Natural Law Provides the Answers

God is the Author of the natural law. He doesn't make mistakes.

Read this article by By Tom Mullen Published 09/12/09 for some insight into what we must do to take our country back.

It is not the majority that determines what our rights are, but it is the majority that makes the laws that are supposed to protect them. We must rediscover our founding philosophy and persuade our fellow Americans to again accept it as our creed, with a written Constitution as its supporting code. For any one of us to regain our freedom, we must "educate and inform the whole mass of the people.[7]" While they are ignorant of the law of nature, they are a force of tyranny that cannot be overcome, no matter how just the cause or how committed the patriot. Once reacquainted with this most fundamental of laws, they are equally irresistible as the "only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.[8]" When the inhabitants of America are again guided by reason to reclaim their natural rights and to defend those rights for everyone, we can institute new Government without firing a shot. What could be more progressive than that?


Read the whole article here:  http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=209

The Silent Majority has finally spoken!

Is it too late?   I hope not!

Perhaps hundreds of thousands, certainly tens of thousands of people, who mostly have never done anything like this before, have converged on Washington District of Criminals and made their voices heard.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Almost too late to get any Silver in most any form.

We have been waiting and are being told 4 to 6 weeks minimum to get our silver orders now.

Don't take my word for it. Listen to these videos.

Jason Hommel Interview by Steve Quayle.
6 parts, each about 9 minutes.
Topics: Silver Manipulation, short selling, paper selling fraud, etc.

Jason HOMMEL : the silver market manipulation (interview by Steve Quayle) part 1/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sma_Jq6RTk4

Jason HOMMEL interview part 2/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSTkPrWkNUA

Jason HOMMEL interview part 3/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAboFGMSEQI

Jason HOMMEL interview part 4/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MeJIgTKBEA

Jason HOMMEL interview part 5/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBpfb8di9gU

Jason HOMMEL interview part 6/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGALu--x1vY

Read Jason Hommel's newsletter on a regular basis and it will change your outlook and your finances.
http://www.silverstockreport.com/

Buy Silver here:  http://www.teapartysilver.com/

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Shocker! Judge orders trial on eligibility issue!

Arguments planned Jan. 11 for major Obama challenge.

By Jerome R. Corsi © 2009 WorldNetDaily

A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.


Read the whole story here:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109242

REVOLUTION Is that what is happening in AmeriKa?

At the core of democracy is the rule of law, and we have already lost it.

This revolution won't be stopped, and our country won't be rescued, by the Republicans in Washington.

Republicans in Washington remind me of those bumbling Weimar Republic politicians in Berlin who never grasped where Hitler and the Nazis were going until it was too late to stop them, or of those hapless Mensheviks in Moscow's Duma who let themselves be tossed into history's dustbin by Lenin and his Bolsheviks.

Herbert E. Meyer served during the Reagan Administration as Special Assistant to the Director of Central Intelligence and Vice Chairman of the CIA's National Intelligence Council. He holds the U.S. National Intelligence Distinguished Service Medal, which is the Intelligence Community's highest honor. He is author of The Cure for Poverty and How to Analyze Information.

Read the whole article here: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/revolution.html

Are Obama and Jones the same?

THE BLOGGER WHO NAILED VAN JONES

Loudon concludes, “Jones’ resignation is a blow for the left and a victory for freedom, but it is only the beginning in unmasking a whole series of White house radicals. They may not have been as loud mouth and indiscrete as Van Jones—but that makes them more dangerous, not less. Millions of Americans now have some inkling of what is happening to their country. Now is the time to amp up the pressure and research.”

Read the whole article here:  http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff348.htm

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Panic in D.C.? Justice urges birth suit tossed

Late motion filed by feds as case ready for hearing

Posted: September 07, 2009
10:54 pm Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

The U.S. Justice Department is urging a federal judge in California to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of president.

Read the whole story here:  http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109197

What is the Lincoln County Watch?

So many seem to be afraid of the words “Lincoln County Watch”, I am not sure why, I guess it is the Newspaper or the Rumor Mill’s version of Reality that has people scared.

This “group” started as a Ron Paul Support Group and transitioned into Lincoln County Watch, I went to a meeting the first time and there were quite a few people there, those folks are now either scared to “associate” or just simply moved on.

Read the whole article here:
 
http://www.eurekamontananews.com/2009/09/what-is-lincoln-county-watch.html

Challenge for ALL Sheriffs including Daryl R. Anderson of Lincoln County Montana

Are you letting some Federal officer or official run your department?

Did you take the oath to support, defend, and obey the Constitution for the United States of America, and the Constitution of your State?

If you took it, in Montana it should be on file with the clerk and recorder.
Is your oath on file?

Are you going to keep that oath?

We the People of the County have a right to know. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen! If you are going to knuckle under to unlawful federal actions resign now so we can get a sheriff who will keep His oath.

If you say you will resign when they ask you to go get the guns, you have already broken your oath. You are part of the problem, not part of the solution!

Here is your challenge:



Sign on to Oath Keepers here: http://oathkeepers.org/oath/


Paul Stramer

Republican Precinct Committeeman Precinct 3, and State Committeeman, Lincoln County Montana
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The video is third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Monday, September 7, 2009

Van Jones Resigns

Beck: American People Stood Up to Bring Down Van Jones


Sunday, September 6, 2009 8:43 PM
Fox News host Glenn Beck, who led the charge calling for the resignation of President Barack Obama’s “Green Jobs Czar” Van Jones said Sunday that Jones is only the first of many radicals in the administration who should be facing questions.

“The American people stood up and demanded answers," Beck wrote in a statement. “Instead of providing them, the Administration had Jones resign under cover of darkness. I continue to be amazed by the power of everyday Americans to initiate change in our government through honest questioning, and judging by the other radicals in the administration, I expect that questioning to continue for the foreseeable future."

Read the rest here:  http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/beck_jones_obama_boycott/2009/09/06/256993.html?s=al&promo_code=8834-1

Birth Certificate controversy rages on about Obama and Kenya

Court document swears Kenyan birth cert legit

Owner risks perjury in high-profile case to insist Barack Obama born in Africa

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109113

Gretchen Wilson&Merle Haggard-Politically Uncorrect

Obama speech to schoolchildren Unlawful?

Why Obama’s Address to Schoolchildren Is Objectionable


by Michael S. Rozeff

LewRockwell.com

Mon, Sep 7th, 2009 12:00:00 am

Source: LewRockwell.com


As I read the many editorial columns and articles in support of Obama’s speech, I can see that many writers are very upset and emotional over criticism of Obama’s action. They also are clueless concerning the reasons why his address is unwelcome. They are name-calling. They are not bothering to mention, much less rebut, the reasoned objections of people like me.

I can at least articulate my reasons for objecting.

Such a speech blurs or crosses several boundaries that I believe there are good reasons to have in place.

The President’s constitutional powers are explicit. They include the "executive Power." They include being "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States" and a few more listed in the Constitution, including preserving and protecting the Constitution. They do not include addressing schoolchildren.

If the President were to live up to his oath to preserve and protect the Constitution, he would request that Congress repeal all its laws regarding education. Section 8 of Article I lists the powers of Congress. Education is not on that list. So when the President addresses schoolchildren, he breaks his oath in several ways. He does not have that power, and he affirms and solidifies a power assumed by Congress that Congress does not have. The President is failing in his sworn duty. Those who think that the President’s speech is helpfully teaching civics are mistaken. His speech is conveying and confirming anti-civics and anti-Constitutional lessons.

The President is a political leader. He is not in office to be an educator. His duties are clearly laid out, and they do not include educating children. By the same token, the President is not the parent of all these children. He is not their teacher. He is not their religious leader. The reason for these boundaries is so that political figures do not use their power and influence to dominate our social lives.

It is a special danger to liberty and society when national powers are developed. These are powers in which the national leadership directly controls or influences individual citizens, while bypassing or circumventing other local sources of governance and influence such as parents, families, churches, schools, and local governments.

An Obama address to schoolchildren is an instance of the further development of national power and influence. It breaks new ground in the influence of State over society. Public education already is under the influence of objectionable forces, but this establishes a new precedent that can be extended. If one political leader addresses youth, other leaders are more likely to address youth. The content of their speeches can be enlarged. Their influence can be enlarged. Government will be given more play and support than it already has. Such a speech is inescapably political. Such a precedent can eventually lead to further dangerous developments, such as a Presidential Youth or an Obama Youth.

The President is a politician. Any address he might make, no matter how nonpartisan it may seem, is bound to be political. It cannot be neutral. The very fact that he is President and making such a speech will be taken in by school children. He will be conveying his authority to these children, with the blessings of their parents and school teachers. They will be taught by the speech itself, regardless of its content, to look to the national government in matters relating to their lives. After all, is he not addressing them about very personal and civic matters? His speech is necessarily a political act.

The President is the leader of a particular political party, so that the very fact that he is a Democrat who is President and making such a speech influences his listeners. Children grow up to be voting adults.

In any speech, what the President says lies beyond the control of those who allow that speech to enter the classroom. The teachers have control over the subsequent discussion, if they choose to have it. But the President will already have made his impact. Children do not fully possess the capacities to judge political matters.

Will the opposition party demand equal time? Do we want politicians routinely competing with one another for the attention of and influence over children?

The President commands the airwaves. This is a dangerous and influential power when used with adults. Allowing this power to be extended to communication with every child in the country is even more dangerous.

School districts can opt out of the speech. In some districts, children may be allowed to opt out of the speech. These options are good ones. But they do not alter the reasons outlined above for objecting to a president making speeches in schools.

I’d like to add that I have seldom read stronger words in newspapers directed against those who object to Obama’s speechmaking to children. They are being called crackpots. They are being accused of demonizing the President. They are being accused of McCarthyism. They are being accused of being racist, completely insane, and members of the right-wing lunatic fringe.

These attacks are not called for. There are very good reasons to object to Obama’s speech. I’ll sum up the ones that bother me. There are no doubt others, but I have made no attempt to research them and find out what others are thinking on this matter.

The speech is beyond the President’s constitutional powers.

The President is supporting a national role in education, which also is unconstitutional.

The President is not supporting his oath of office, so he is conveying an anti-constitutional message to children.

The President is crossing a boundary between the political and social spheres. That boundary is in place in order to control government power and maintain a healthy free society.

The President is augmenting national power and influence.

The President is starting a new precedent that has dangerous implications.

The President’s speech cannot possibly be non-political. The very act itself is politically in furtherance of government and an enhanced government role.

The President also leads his party, and that fact may influence children.

The President may have an undue influence over children due to his position and power.

Will fairness considerations lead to equal time for opposition leaders?

Presidential access to communications is dangerous enough without extending it to youth.

September 7, 2009

Michael S. Rozeff [send him mail] is a retired Professor of Finance living in East Amherst, New York.

Copyright © 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Sunday, September 6, 2009

The Largest Street Gang in AmeriKa?

Is this coming to Lincoln County Montana?

Or is it already here?  Are you an officer or deputy? Do you know your duty? Did you take an oath to uphold the law? Did you take an oath to uphold, defend and obey the Constitution for the United States and the Constitution of Montana? Is that oath on file so we can see it like the  law requires? Have you read your oath lately? Are you going to keep it?
Or are you going to do like the officers in this video?

If you are going to keep your oath we support you and want to visit with you about how you can keep it. The public is NOT your enemy. We are law abiding people who want to see peace and good order in our communities rather than a police state.

To see how you can keep your oath go here:  http://oathkeepers.org/oath/

The Largest Street Gang in America


Paul Stramer
Republican Precinct Committeeman Precinct 3, and State Committeeman, Lincoln County Montana

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The video is third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Silver Autoship with low prices.

It is critical you watch these new movies on the currency crisis.

http://inflation.us/videos.html


This is happening NOW.

Comments Please!

We are now offering a monthly autoship service for those who just want to buy silver and not be bothered with any marketing.

Some of you are doing well with Silver Snowball but some have not found the time or just don't want to market.

The minimum is 5 ounces per month, but you can put any quantity on autoship above that up to 100 ounces.

You must use a credit or debit card. Any major card will do it.

The shipping is according to the following scale and always includes insurance.

The silver will be shipped via US Priority Mail insured and with delivery confirmation.

The price is always $20 per ounce plus shipping.

Shipping is as follows:

1 to 10 ounces $11 11 to 14 ounces $14 15 to 19 ounces $15

20 to 30 ounces $16 31 to 40 ounces $20 60 ounces $24

80 ounces $28 100 ounces $32 120 ounces $36


Remember, you can't spend any money when you buy silver. You are just changing your wealth into a much less risky form of money.

We will track your autoship and charge your card on the anniversary of your initial order each month, shipping the same day.

You can order from several different designs, but all are one troy ounce of fine (.999) silver.

See the designs available here: http://www.teapartysilver.com/silverforsale.html

You can call and change your order from one type to another at any time.

Just call me at 800 889 2839 to get started.

Sincerely,

Paul Stramer    pstramer@eurekadsl.net

Pull your kids from School on September 8th.

Make September 8 a Family Day!

by Linda Schrock Taylor

John Birch Society

Fri, Sep 4th, 2009 12:00:00 am

http://www.voteronpaul.com/newsDetail.php?Make-September-8-a-Family-Day-2127

I wouldn't send my child to school on September 8, unless I had a strong death wish for America. On September 8, President Obama will be broadcasting a prepared speech to every school child, grades K-12, in America. On September 8, Obama the Change Agent begins his takeover of the schools…but not with my child, and hopefully not with yours.



Shared via AddThis

When is it time to fight?

TO THE AMERICAN PATRIOT COMMUNITIES AND INDIVIDUALS

From the Desk of Paul Stramer
I want to ask a some questions.

Before I do, please understand that right now I still believe "the pen is mightier than the sword". I have been very active politically all my life. I believe in lawful solutions, political solutions, legislative solutions.

But I don't think most of you really understand who Obama and his crew are. They are communists, socialists, and yes terrorists. They are terrorizing We The People, with threats of taking our guns and ammo, controlling our food supply, and many other actions completely repugnant to the supreme law, our Constitution.

They don't give a damn about law and order, or morality. The only thing they care about is power. They are drunk with power, and greed. They are the most evil of rulers because they promote the rule of men rather than the rule of law, and they use the law as a cloak for malice, all by FRAUD and deception.

What is Fraud?

Fraud is defined as: "Deceitful conduct designed to manipulate another person to give something of value by (1) lying, (2) by repeating something that is or ought to have been known by the fraudulent party as false or suspect or (3) by concealing a fact from the other party which may have saved that party from being cheated.

The existence of fraud will cause a court to void a contract and can give rise to criminal liability."

Fraud can be perpetrated by government agents or elected officials under the "color of law". By publishing things as fact and law that are repugnant to the Supreme Law, The Constitution for the Untited States of America, government agents would have you believe they have the power to do all sorts of unlawful things, like lay and collect taxes without apportionment, and bail out banks and car companies.

Regulating guns within the states under the commerce clause, that were never intended to be "regulated" by the founders is another "fraud".

See the new law in Montana HB246

href="http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm

In fact most of the things the feds do are outside the Constitution and are "color of law" fraudulent usurpation.

So now for my questions.

In a time when there is absolutely no justice available in the courts, and most elected officials and officers of the courts are corrupt, HOW ARE THESE CRIMINALS WHO ARE SELLING OUT OUR COUNTRY, TO BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE ?

While I agree that we should not start a shooting war, are we to stand idly by and watch an out of control government send hit squads called swat and FBI raids to harass and kill our neighbors because they were all painted with a broad brush and made to be "criminals" overnight by an out of control legislative body who are part of the problem, not part of the solution?

When does it become proper and moral to lay down the pen, and take up the sword?

How far are you willing to let this criminal government go before you use whatever means is at your disposal to stop them from harming your family, or your neighbor?

Make no mistake. If you let them harm your law-abiding neighbors when you know them to be God fearing and law-abiding people, YOU ARE NEXT. Ask the people who lived in Germany when the Gestapo was rounding up Jews. Ask them what hindsight has taught them.

Ask Randy Weaver how the FBI set him up.

Ask YOURSELF how much you will put up with before you fight?

Then if the answer is not readily apparent, and you want to avoid this entire scenario, you need to get up right now and go to work politically. Run for office. Write articles. Send emails, vote in the on line polls. Spread the truth. Seek lawful solutions. Testify at your legislature for good bills, like 10th amendment resolutions, and good gun laws. If you haven't done all these and more, don't consider yourself a good patriot. Don't think you have the right to sit behind the scenes and wait, keeping your powder dry and that at the last minute you can fight with guns and turn this all around.

Yes you can defend your family, and neighbors, but that is not enough to stop these criminals in government. This has to be a popular movement, and that, my friends, is done not with a gun, but with a pen, and the internet, and in person by word of mouth, and using whatever media is available to you.

Plan for the worst, and hope for the best. Get on your knees and pray like it's all up to God, then get up and work like it's all up to you!

So would somebody please answer my questions?  How far are YOU willing to let this go? Are you willing to use ALL the tools available, not just guns?

Make no mistake. The government agents will send their provocateurs to try to provoke you into doing something violent, and illegal so they will have an excuse to put you away.
Don't fall for it!

They will infiltrate your groups, and try to get you to push the edge of the law, and that is all it will take.
Ask Randy Weaver about that.

Get his book here:  http://www.amazon.com/Federal-Siege-At-Ruby-Ridge/dp/0966433408/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1237478765&sr=1-2


Don't "Jump the Gun" if you know what I mean.

Paul Stramer
Republican Precinct Committeeman Precinct 3, and State Committeeman, Lincoln County Montana

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced ©

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Is Martial Law Legitimate and Constitutional?

We are hearing talk of possible Martial Law.  What exactly does that mean, and when, if ever, is "Martial Law" lawful, or Constitutional?

ALL SHERIFFS, DEPUTIES, POLICE OFFICERS, ELECTED OFFICIALS, AND EMPLOYEES OF GOVERNMENT -- IT IS CRITICAL YOU READ THIS BEFORE YOU DO SOMETHING YOU WILL REGRET LATER!

Read the answer here by one of the nation's foremost Constitutional Attorneys.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin198.htm

Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School).


For more than thirty years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition of their employment.

He has written numerous monographs and articles in scholarly journals, and lectured throughout the country. His most recent work on money and banking is the two-volume Pieces of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution (2002), the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective. www.piecesofeight.us

He is also the co-author (under a nom de plume) of the political novel CRA$HMAKER: A Federal Affaire (2000), a not-so-fictional story of an engineered crash of the Federal Reserve System, and the political upheaval it causes. http://www.crashmaker.com/

His latest book is: "How To Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary" ... and Constitutional "Homeland Security," Volume One, The Nation in Arms...

He can be reached at his new address:

52 Stonegate Court

Front Royal, VA 22630.

Just got a call from Red Beckman

Red Beckman, just called. He is one of the pioneers of the Patriot movement and author of Walls In Our Minds.
He will be speaking in Hamilton Montana at 7 PM on September 15th at the fair grounds pavilion.
Entering Hamilton from the North turn left at the first stop light and go one block straight east through the fairgrounds gate and look to your left. You will be in the parking lot.

Come early and attend the pot luck or just buy a hot dog and visit.

Red will give a 58 minute presentation on the solutions to take our country back from the radical leftist agenda and the monetary terrorists who are driving our economy into the ground.

If you really want some solutions instead of  meet, eat and retreat, come and listen for yourself.

MIAC Report vetted at hearing

Press Release - Missouri Campaign For Liberty members testify at House committee hearing on MIAC

 
Posted by Paul Hamby on 09/01/09 01:08 AM

For Immediate release: Monday August 31, 2009

The Missouri House Interim Committee on State Intelligence Analysis Oversight met today in Grandview Missouri. The committee chaired by Rep Bob Dixon and co-chaired by Rep Jim Guest heard testimony from citizens concerned with the MIAC report released last spring by the Missouri Highway Patrol Fusion Center.

Grandview Alderman Mike Furgason testified his concern that MIAC has no oversight and suggested the state legislature should set up an oversight committee. "Someone needs to read and approve these reports before they are released"

The committee is charged with taking recommendations back to the legislature regarding the MIAC, Missouri Information Analysis Center. Last spring, the MIAC garnered national attention when a report was leaked to the news media. That report profiled many Missouri citizens as potential Militia Members. The report profiled gun owners, Christians, home schoolers, constitutionalists and implied that persons who displayed a Gadsden Flag or bumper stickers of Presidential candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr or Chuck Baldwin were persons of interest for law enforcement to watch out for. Constitution party Vice Presidential candidate Darrell Castle testified at Monday's hearing. He expressed concern that his parties members simply want our federal government to follow the constitution and the members were unfairly lumped with people who are true threats to society. When asked what the solution was, he recommended eliminating the MIAC department completely. Castle testified that the Federal Government has gone well beyond its mandate in the US Constitution. That theme that the federal government is not abiding by the 10th amendment of the constitution was a concern of several citizens and at least 4 of the legislators on the committee.

Deb Wells, National Member Services Director for Campaign for Liberty testified that a 2007 audit shows nearly 700 people a day are being added to the watch lists. She fears she might be on the watch list and could be detained at a simple traffic stop. It appears nearly impossible to remove your name from the watch list due to the way the information is shared worldwide. "Will I be put in jail for 60 days because I believe in the 2nd amendment or because I supported Chuck Baldwin for President?"

Larry Flinchpaugh, a Buchanan county volunteer for Campaign for Liberty, testified "I was appalled and insulted to read that I was being profiled as possibly belonging to a subversive group simply because of my political activism." Flinchpaugh, an author from St Joe Missouri further testified "I believe that our government should (1) abide by the Constitution, (2) adopt sound monetary policies by abolishing the private and unconstitutional Federal Reserve and Fractional Reserve Banking and the 16th amendment authorizing income taxes to be collected on our wages, (3) stop being the policeman of the world and bring our troops home from most of the hundreds of military bases around the world, (4) respect the sovereignty of the individual states, and (5) recognize that a government that governs "least" governs" best." Does this sound like a description of a "Militia Movement" member or "Terrorist" or a "Patriotic American" who believes like our founding fathers?"

Paul Hamby, a Missouri Coordinator for Campaign for Liberty testified "Political Profiling discourages free speech. Beyond the constitutional issues, we need to look at the Big Picture. How will we ever find the best solutions to the issues facing our country today, if we cannot have Honest Open Debates?" Hamby praised Missouri Highway Patrolmen, then testified that the MIAC report hurt the department's credibility. Will Missouri Law enforcement take these reports seriously next time? What if the next report is a real threat of the next Timothy McVeigh?" Hamby held up John Ashcroft's book "Never Again" and told the committee "Never Again shall Missouri Government profile our citizens based on their political beliefs"

72 Fusion centers have been set up across the United States. They are funded by the Dept of Homeland Security with a 2009 budget of 274 million dollars. Rep. Brian D. Nieves expressed concern that this was another case of the Federal Government telling us how to run our state. "The risk is that we start these projects with federal dollars and then 2 or 3 years later the federal government comes along with mandates tied to the money."

The House committee will hold one more hearing for public testimony.

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced ©

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Radical Leftist Polarization of Law Enforcement Personnel !

Subject: Bozeman paper interview w Steward Rhodes & Elias Alias

Here's a teaser from the full article found in the link below:

"We think there is cause for concern," said Travis McAdam, executive director of the Montana Human Rights Network.

And the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks "extremist" activity throughout the country, in a report this month points to the Oath Keepers as a "particularly worrisome example of the Patriot Revival." The SPLC further reports that it’s likely only a matter of time before some segment of the Patriot Revival becomes violent.

The Department of Homeland Security considers groups that reject federal authority in favor of local authority "rightwing extremists," according to an April 7 "threat analysis" released by the agency.

And that doesn’t sit well with Alias.

http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2009/08/23/news/000alias.txt


Radical Leftist Polarization of Law Enforcement Personnel !

From the desk of Paul Stramer -- Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

The radical leftist Montana Human Rights Network, along with the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Lee Newspapers chain, and some federal agencies, are involved in a borderline criminal conspiracy attempting to demonize, scandalize, slander and paint all law abiding and freedom loving Americans as criminal, or potential terrorists. They speak the same leftist, communist language as every communist agitator in history. They abuse their power of communication and free speech to promote lawless hate against law abiding, and freedom loving people nationwide and worldwide.

The reality is that they themselves are the real terrorists. They endorse the radical leftist agenda and threats of taking guns away from law abiding citizens, making everyone dependent upon a socialist or communist police state for their very lives, taking away private ownership of property, destroying freedom of speech and of the press with their so called "hate crimes" legislation, and destroying the most successful document of government ever devised by man and inspired by God, the Constitution for the United States of America, the SUPREME LAW OF THESE UNITED STATES.


These organizations, in effect, don't believe in the Rule of Law. They believe in the rule of men making the rules as they go, and their leader seems to be the person who claims to be the President, while hiding all evidence of his eligibility, and organizing "communities" of lawless street agitators like ACORN and SEIU and other highly paid subversives intent on destroying the rule of law and replacing it with total government control of every facet of your lives.

These organizations are feeding the Federal fusion centers, and all federal, local and state agencies with FALSE INFORMATION designed to create paranoia in the ranks of "Law Enforcement" and polarize them against anyone who talks against the radical left agenda. This is the classic communist strategy of radicalization used to stir up hate and discontent among the public, and goad private freedom loving residents into some kind of physical conflagration.

Communists have used this method in every country they have subjugated throughout their history. They will and have gone so far as to plant agent provocateurs inside various freedom groups who will goad members into some illegal activity, so the radicals have the opportunity to further radicalize and demonize those organizations. Ask Randy Weaver about that? Was Timothy McVeigh one of these agents, and was he a patsy just like he said he was? Why were they in such a hurry to kill him if not to shut him up because he knew too much about who really engineered that attack?

Sorry boys, we are smarter than that.

You are wasting your breath, because the people don't believe your tired old lies and buzzwords any more. They don't believe that the word Militia is a bad word even though every time you use it you attempt to associate the word with some lawless warlord in Somalia or some other country. We know that the lawful militia is a concept embodied in the early history of our nation and is greatly responsible for our freedom early on in our history. We know that the militia itself is embodied and defined in the laws of our country and that the concept is perfectly lawful. If you don't believe it, don't take my word for it.

Go to the internet and read for yourselves.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin71.htm

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin72.htm

We the People don't believe that your tired old buzzword "Freeman" means "criminal" like you want it to mean, since a true Free Man is a We the People resident and Created being who did "ordain and establish" the Supreme Law, the Constitution for the United States as a law for GOVERNMENT to follow, in order to SECURE the unalienable God given rights bestowed on Man by God in man's very nature.

We don't believe your tired old buzzwords "Right Wing Radical" since a true right wing radical would be an anarchist who believes in no law or government at all, which is the real opposite of your Radical Leftist agenda of TOTAL GOVERNMENT made perfect in communism, the rule by the bullet or threat and intimidation thereof. We know that the only difference between your leader's socialist agenda and communism is that socialism is totalitarianism by the ballot, while communism is totalitarianism by the bullet.

We also know that you preach freedom only to use it as a cloak for malice. All we have to do is go to your websites to see your endorsement of immorality at all levels.

Travis McAdam continues to mouth the same language as communist/leftist agitators whether he knows it or not, and so does Morris Dees of the SPLC, insofar as from their own words they seem to parallel the Marxist agenda that has been used throughout the history of communism. Just go read what they write and endorse, and then read the communist manifesto at the link below and decide for yourself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Communist_Manifesto

It's really mind-blowing that the local cops and sheriff's deputies are sucking this propaganda up like candy. They don't bother to even talk to people who love the Constitution and freedom to get their views. They just seem to believe all this leftist propaganda without question, and they won't study any history, or law, or any other view. Remember, law enforcement personnel, that those who refuse to learn from history are condemned to repeat it. Are you doing your own thinking or are you letting your boss or some federal agent do your thinking for you?

As a result of this propaganda, law enforcement generally now refuses to believe there are actually people out here that believe in the Rule of Law, and are willing to put their lives on the line to protect the Supreme Law so everyone can continue in Freedom and Liberty.

True radical leftists are liars leading liars and they will all fall in the pit of human suffering just like millions in history who have believed Satan's lies and followed the big government deception of free bread and circuses. Those socialist and communist systems of government never work and while they are in control, millions of people suffer and die. Is that what they want? Are they deliberately trying to reduce the population without destroying the infrastructure? Is it Total Government they are after and they think they will be in the ruling class in this totalitarian structure?

Beware that this is an old song. It's been sung throughout history. It's the song of God's enemies, and God always comes out on top.

Here is a history lesson for all the local cops, sheriff's deputies, elected officials, and any other office holder whether appointed or elected that is helping this radical leftist agenda. You have nothing to fear from us freedom-loving people as long as you obey the law and take your oath of office seriously, and with an informed mind.

But when radical leftist (read communist) organizations are done using you to subjugate the American populace, you will be the first people they will eliminate, because they know they can't trust someone who is willing to sell out their fellow countrymen.

That is the history of communist agitators throughout the history of the leftist communist conquest of countries in the last century.

They eliminate, usually with a bullet in the head, everyone who helped them get to power. They purge their ranks of local officials, and bureaucrats that helped them create their police state. Then they go on to kill everyone they think might have a potential of creating any dissent at all. Don't take my word for it. Google "communist purges" and do your own homework.

I am sorry you are so ignorant of history, the law and your responsibility. The classic definition of ignorance is "Not knowing what is required by one's station in life." You took an oath to uphold, defend and obey the Supreme Law, the Constitution for the United States of America, the only document of it's kind in history that has secured our God given rights for well over 200 years, and the document that the whole world admires and wants to imitate. Our shores are constantly bombarded by people fleeing other forms of government because they fall far short of ours.

You have broken your solemn oath to uphold the law if you endorse the rule of men that these radical leftists promote. When you trample on the rights of private residents of the county or state you live in, you can be worse than any terrorist.

When you threaten law abiding residents with the loss of their freedom for holding to the Supreme Law, The Constitution, you are worse than any terrorist because you are the very persons who are sworn to uphold our rights and protect us from the lawless and radical leftist agenda especially if they are in a majority. We do not have a Democracy (mob rule) in America. We have a Constitutional Republic designed to protect the minority from the will of a lawless majority.

We don't ask for much from you. We only ask you to actually read the documents you swore that oath to uphold, defend and obey, and then to OBEY THE LAW, and refuse to threaten and intimidate private law abiding residents who are only insisting on being heard.

We want you to stop falling for the lies of the radical leftist conspiracy. We want you to study the founding documents you swore to defend from all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. Then we want you to do your real duty, which is to secure the rights given by God, the author of nature itself, the rights those documents embody and protect!

Until you do this you can't be trusted by We The People to uphold your office. You can't be worthy of your paycheck.

Ask yourself this question? Who is running your department? Is it the fusion centers or some federal agent? Are you taking their word for what is going on, rather than doing your own homework and talking to local residents about these issues? When was the last time you read the Constitutions of the USA and Montana? Do you understand what they mean? Are you doing your own thinking, or are you letting your boss hold your paycheck over your head, while you just follow along blindly?

Are you swallowing what Travis McAdam, SPLC, and the fusion centers are saying without checking it out. Well you should get the information about Oath-Keepers right from their own website before you do something you will regret.

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/

Don't take the word of the people who brought you Waco and Ruby Ridge, namely federal agencies. Question boldly, embrace the truth then do your job right and with integrity. Keep your Oath. If you can't take that heat, then get out of the kitchen, and make room for someone who will keep their oath. Perhaps someone like former Sheriff Richard Mack.

See his answer here to the latest diatribe from SPLC.

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2009/08/14/sheriff-richard-mack-ret-responds-to-southern-poverty-law-center-smear-attack-on-oath-keepers-and-on-sheriff-mack/

If this letter makes you angry, then you must be doing something wrong. If you are uneasy about it just call me and ask lots of questions. I can direct you to much good study written by dozens of authors that prove what I am saying about the law.

Here is a place to start.

http://www.newswithviews.com/

http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/issues.html

Sincerely,

Paul Stramer
Eureka Montana
406 889 3183
Skype: pstramer
S.A.G.
pstramer@eurekadsl.net

Republican Precinct Committeeman Precinct 3, and State Committeeman, Lincoln County Montana

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at www.paulstramer.net. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced ©