Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Friday, May 18, 2018

Holy Moly!!!!!!! This Is the BIG ONE!


By Anna Von Reitz

The Fourth Maxim of Commercial Law is crucial.  It establishes the Due Process of Commercial Law by demanding that someone stick their neck out and declare their responsibility for telling the truth to the court by providing an affidavit. 

TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13: Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5: 12). 

I have not had much respect for Commercial Law and haven't studied it a whole lot, mostly because I noted years ago that it was broken.  It doesn't work the way it should. Specifically, affidavits don't work.  The courts ignore them. 

Now, almost by accident, I know why and it is so simple, it's stupid. 

First, via the "US Citizen" political status fraud, the vermin re-defined us as "decedents" --- that is, people who willingly declined their birthright estate.  Next, they "enfranchised" us --- created multiple business entities and public trusts and public utilities named after us -- all that remained  on the public record were incorporated entities: JOHN DOE, JOHN M. DOE, and JOHN MARK DOE, and it was these incorporated entities that the courts addressed.  

And the "Rest of the Story is......."

Burning Books 101


By Anna Von Reitz

It began in Alexandria, with the burning of the famous library there.  It has continued down through history.  Burning books and destroying records is the hallmark of criminality -- especially government-sponsored criminality.  

We saw it when the British burned Washington, DC, in the War of 1812, we saw it in the so-called American Civil War when Sherman sacked Atlanta and Richmond, we saw it in Germany in both World War I and II, we saw it in New York on 911.  One of the primary objects of all these terrible venal actions was the destruction of records.

In more recent times, simply falsifying vast numbers of public records has been adopted by the same guilty parties --- such as the human trafficking on paper that the American People have suffered, purposefully mis-identifying millions upon millions of them as British Territorial United States Citizens.  

It should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone that the records of the Territorial United States Corporations are constantly being destroyed, archived, culled, re-ordered, re-published, issued in re-numbered, re-annotated, and re-structured versions.  Except for really famous cases like the Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States any court cases or opinion utterances damaging to the agenda of the criminals among us are likely to disappear or be shuffled off.  Even current news stories that are "uncomplimentary" regularly disappear.  The links vanish, as in this case reported to me today by "illusion buster"--- and I quote: 

Don't Make This Common Mistake


By Anna Von Reitz

I am re-posting an insightful, heart-felt, and pointed article from John Whitehead that appeared in Zero Hedge (below).  In it, John Whitehead asks --- with abundant food for thought --- Is the US Government Evil?   And the answer in view of the facts has to be a resounding ---yes, the US Government is evil, however..... thanks to the semantic deceits and political usurpation of the British Territorial United States, it isn't clear to the average American or other people around the world which "United States" is at fault. 

Let's make this perfectly clear --- America has been at peace for a 150 years.  The entity responsible for the endless wars and misery is not the actual United States, but is instead the British-controlled Territorial United States.  Two completely different entities, both of which may be called "United States"---- and the criminals among us simply don't distinguish between the actual United States and the Territorial United States--- leaving us to take the blame for their evils. 

Don't blame America for this.  Blame the actual source of the oppression and evil-- which is the British Government, not ours. 

Is The US Government Evil?

Meet the Raj


By Anna Von Reitz

Mahatma Gandhi faced off the brutal Raj in India and now, we meet them here. 

Make no mistake, most of the world is facing the same Raj today.  We simply didn't know who they were or how they were operating, but now that we do, it is apparent that the same British Commercial Feudalism that kept India strangled for the better part of a hundred years has done the same here and throughout much of the rest of the world, too. 

These are people so brutal and cheap that they would keep poor farmers from harvesting salt from the sea -- salt that they needed to live in India's hot climate, salt that they needed to preserve their food, salt that God gave them for free --- but for which the British Raj charged top dollar and defended their evil practice with guns. 

The UN Trusteeship


By Anna Von Reitz

The UN Trusteeship

According to this mammoth fraud against the American States and People, we just disappeared one day, like the ships of the Dutch East India company or the Templar Fleet before them, and deserted all our property here in America, leaving it behind in the care of our servants for hire -- the British-controlled Territorial United States.

As such, we were deemed by those same dishonest servants to have "donated" our "abandoned" estates to the good of whomever, and most likely, to ourselves, should we ever "return" from "over the sea".

Of course, we were never informed of our purported absence, nor of our supposed donation of our good names and assets.

As Mark Twain noted when this fraud first started --- rumors of our death have been greatly exaggerated.

The Public Law and the Private "Law"


By Anna Von Reitz

More mirroring. 

Yesterday, I discussed the necessity of nailing down exactly which "United States" is being referred to in every instance and brought attention to the fact that our Territorial servants have defrauded us via the use of deliberate confusions and semantic deceits.  

This process of "mirroring" everything is endemic, from the sacred office of the Pope being mirrored by the secular office of Pontiff, and the United States of America, Inc. being passed off as The United States of America (Unincorporated) on down.  It therefore comes as no surprise that The United States created by the Colonies back in 1776 has been "mirrored" by the United States exercising powers delegated to it in 1787, and that the Territorial United States and Municipal United States have made merry with the name "United States", too. 

This basic principle of the Satanists holds true throughout their system.  They label everything and mirror everything, even the law itself. 

The Public Law is mirrored by their private law. 

Our Sheriffs are peacekeeping officers.  Their Sheriffs are law enforcement officers. 

Clearfield Doctrine


By Anna Von Reitz

The Clearfield Doctrine (which Larry probably can't find, either) arises from a 1943 Supreme Court Case, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 US 363-371.  

The essence of the case is that when an incorporated government uses private bank script as its currency it sinks to the level of any other incorporated entity, loses its sovereign status (if it ever had any) and becomes subject to the same laws as any other corporation.  

You can look up the actual case to your heart's delight, but it is also reprised in CJS, as I was kindly reminded tonight by a friend: 

Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS)  91 CJS United States sec. 4
".....when the United States enters into commercial business it abandons its sovereign capacity and is to be treated like any other corporation."
Now, if you have followed along you know that the British Territorial United States was never sovereign with respect to us.  It was merely a contractor providing us with specific governmental services and acting under our delegated power to do so.  All "federal" powers were delegated to them and all federal powers are limited to the international jurisdiction of the sea. 

This United States or That United States?


By Anna Von Reitz

As we've learned, the favorite fraud technique of these con artists is called "mirroring" ---
They mirrored the Sacred Office of the Pope with the Secular Office of the Pontiff. They mirrored The United States of America (Unincorporated) with the United States of America (Incorporated).... and so it goes all the way down the line. Sometimes they even multiple mirrored things, as in the case we look at today: The United States (formed by the Colonies under The Unanimous Declaration of Independence) and the United States (the Union of National-Level States of States) and the Territorial United States and the Municipal United States.
Which United States are you talking about, eh?
It all depends on context, doesn't it?
And if you don't know the context, or, aren't aware that there are multiple entities that can be called "United States" ..... you can now see how easily the unwary could be entrapped, how you could assume that the "United States" you were thinking of was the "United States" being referenced on a form, for example.
And that is precisely what the vermin have done with all those many, many forms that have asked you if you were a "US Citizen"?

Hey, Fake Lawyer Larry! The Definition of Bar Attorney Is.....


By Anna Von Reitz

This is really too good.  

From the same "British Merchant Marine Service Manuel" published in 1801 that yielded the definition (finally) of "Withholding Agent" as a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marine Service comes this gem: 

A Bar Attorney is a Shipping Clerk in the British Merchant Marine Service. 

A Shipping Clerk.  That's what Larry Becraft is. 

Oh, my...... and the numbers on their Bar Cards?  Those are shipping ticket numbers.   That's how they tag cargo and get credited for their work. 

It makes perfect sense, too.