A Reply from Judge Anna About the National Debt, the National Credit, and the Pope's Role

by Anna Von Reitz

How many times do I have to go through this before people notice the facts for themselves???

The Pope wears two hats--- one sacred, one secular. 

I brought claim against his secular office for Breach of Trust. He admitted it and asked for help correcting the situation. 

How hard is that for anyone to grasp?

I am sick and tired of explaining how I could be a Lutheran acting in a capacity in concert with a Catholic.  If two people of different religions both agree on a single righteous course of action----such as returning American assets to the American People--- where is the controversy or "wonder" in that?

Here's my answer to Ms. Hudes from our Fifth Round of Correspondence about American assets in the "Global Debt Facility"----

"Ms. Hudes – without putting too sharp a point on it, you are yourself a member of a “Secret Society”--- the London Lawyer’s Guild and the Middle Innes of Court--- and you hold the office of at least “Esquire” in their service. This foreign and undisclosed office bears with it an ancient and horrific Oath to the Father of All Lies, called a Nullification Oath, which renders your testimony regarding any matter void. Since you are in the literal service of the Devil, and are bold enough to proclaim it in public, I consider you to be at least as much of a problem as any Knight of Malta."

That is also my answer to all members of the Bar Associations which have been so much a part of creating this entire fraud scheme, putting it in place, promoting it, and preserving it against all decency and reason. 

The Pope admitted his sins and the sins of the Church, but not Karen Hudes. 

Here's some more related to our Fifth Round and this topic:

Anna Von Reitz asked about Leo Wanta

Hi Paul something posted at http://nesaranews.blogspot.com this morning struck me because of the title and heading relates her writing as associated with Leo Wanta. I do not trust Wanta as far as I can throw him and Anna should not be associated with him. I was good friends with Christopher Story from worldreports.org before he passed away. She should see this posting. Sorry for not hyperlinking Thunderbird has glitches. P.S. The 27.5 trillion dollar number Wanta has promulgated as our financial savior was mirrored more than once. Wanta equals Bush Sr.

Joe   

I don't think she is associated with him.  It appears someone else posted Anna's article making it look like Leo Wanta posted the article.

I don't know for sure.

I will show this to her.

 Paul

Lots of people carry work of mine for all sorts of reasons. Right now there are many different factions all milling around -- some have axes to grind and some are trying to carve out empires and so on.  My mission is simple-- return the assets of the American People to the American People.

Everyone on planet Earth should have an interest in seeing that accomplished because if the people of the Continental United States wake up and seize hold of their assets and use them instead of letting criminals from the Federal United States continue to rob us all and promote war mongering, etc.--- the world will be a far better place to live. 

Look at things from that perspective and know that is my goal in mind -- to get the servants back in the control of the American People and the People in control of their own assets instead of trusting crooks to manage their assets for them. 

Know that that is my message and mission and that anyone who supports that is unlikely to be bad or have any bad intention toward the American People. 

Anna

 

Round Five with Karen Hudes--- Judge Anna, January 16, 2016

by Anna Von Reitz

January 16, 2016

KAREN:

Dear Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia Riezinger-von Reitzenstein von Lettow-Vorbeck,

ANNA:

Once again, playing your name games, Karen? If you have done this with the hard copy reply that you claim you have sent (no sign of it here) it will be invalid because not addressed to the claimant--- a flesh and blood woman called “Anna Maria Riezinger” and a flesh and blood man called “James Clinton Belcher”. You have clearly addressed this to someone or some "thing" else other than the lien claimant and it has been translated by others and given to me despite your failure to address it to me. Again, a distinct evasion and avoidance of fact showing a refusal to deal in good faith.

KAREN:

The Board of Governors of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund and Board of Executive Directors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development are not in default as I put a stamped envelope with a hard copy of the answer to your claims in the mailbox addressed to you and your husband at the same time as I posted the response on the internet.https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter1.14.16.3.pdf

ANNA:

As you didn’t answer the lien questions in those remarks, exactly how or why would I consider a paper copy as an answer, either?

If you want the full and real story of what happened to the Hammonds read this.

Oregon Standoff: Federal Land Grab vs. the Sagebrush Rebellion

Joel Skousen - January 09, 2016

The occupation of the headquarters of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Harney County, Oregon by a small group of armed protesters represents a new and confrontational tactic in the Sagebrush Rebellion--the decades old struggle of Western ranchers against federal control of state lands. While the majority of rancher disputes are against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) the US Fish and Wildlife Service has been just as ruthless--in this case expanding the wildlife refuge at the expense of neighboring ranchers. This week I'll detail the struggle of the Hammond family, and of Ammon Bundy the protest leader. When you read the litany of federal abuse of ranching families, you will better understand why some ranchers are staging an armed resistance. I also give some suggestions on how this can be resolved peacefully.The root of the controversy is a constitutional dispute that has never been properly adjudicated. Under Article IV, Section 3:2 (The Property Clause), it says,

The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States….

However, once a territory becomes a state, the federal government can only possess land, within that state for limited purposes: a national capitol, federal military facilities, and certain docking and warehouse facilities related to the collection of tariffs. This is governed by Article I, Section 8:17 which states:

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District [Washington DC] (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings [such as post offices].

Notice, those lands have to be specifically ceded by the states through consent of the state legislatures; they cannot be taken arbitrarily by government. The federal government got around this by making federal ownership of large parts of Western territories a condition of statehood. This had never been done to any state until the territories west of the Dakotas, down through Texas became states. Nevada was literally robbed of 84.5% of its land. In most western states the federal government owns more than half of the land mass. This is outrageous. Here is a link to a map showing the sad facts.