By Anna Von Reitz
For everyone's information:
There are a minimum of four entities operating in international and global jurisdictions which are called "Canada".
"Canada" is -- first and foremost, the name of a country, which is the Canada we always think of when the name is invoked.
Outside the realms of commerce or trade, Canada is a Proper Name and stands for the country known by that Name.
We automatically see the familiar topographical map in our minds, rivers and massive lakes, wide plains and snow-capped mountains click into place, along with the familiar dots and place names of towns and provincial capitols.
Canada, in our minds, is physical. It has borders. It is actual, factual, and familiar.
Unfortunately, while Canada has long existed in the realm of physical contemplation, it has never had full standing as a separate sovereign nation because of the many years it spent first as a "Commonwealth", followed by more decades spent under a British Territorial (military) protectorate imposed by the British Crown when the people "failed" to organize their land-and-soil government following the announcement dissolving the British Commonwealth in the mid-1960's.
After seven years, the Corporatists shrugged and said, "Well, they had their chance." and what masquerades as the Canadian government has remained at sea, largely adrift, and in the control of corporations in the business of providing essential government services. These are foreign, for-profit, privately owned corporations and they have no loyalty to the country or the people beyond using them as resources to plump their bottom line.
People cannot be said to fail tasks when they are deprived of the information needed to even be aware of the work at hand. The people of Canada, like the people of Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and other outposts of the former British Commonwealth.... had no idea what they could do for themselves upon the dissolution of the Commonwealth. No full disclosure was made.
Instead, blank-faced news commentators announced the change, and nothing appeared to change. Nothing at all. To all external observations, references to the British Commonwealth vanished, but references to "a" Commonwealth continued and the government that had been in charge before the big announcement appeared to be the same government afterward.
Pierre Commoner in Canada paused for a moment, thought: "The end of the Commonwealth? What does that mean?" -- and then he went on digging potatoes. He didn't have enough information to do more. There was nothing said to imply that he should -- or could --organize his own government.
The people of Canada were never given full disclosure about anything, least of all, their own history. They couldn't interpret language and circumstances that were, in effect, foreign. The people of Canada don't speak Ancient Greek, and they don't speak Legalese, either.
So they didn't respond to the opportunity provided by the collapse of the British Commonwealth. Most Canadians didn't know what the word "Commonwealth" meant, much less could they interpret the end of whatever-it-was.
It was outside their understanding and more damningly, was meant to be outside their understanding.
If they ever understood the meaning of "Commonwealth" and the meaning of "end of the Commonwealth" they might make a break for it, and develop their own government in their own natural jurisdiction. They could choose to be free, control their own assets, print their own money, and abandon their "voluntary" indentured servitude to the British Queen. They could enjoy the wealth and benefit of their own natural resources and their own labor.
They could, but lacking sufficient information, they didn't.
Canada has been "administered" by a series of incorporated contractors in the business of providing government services ever since the quasi-military contractors, similar to the British Raj in India, began their racketeering concessions in earnest.
Sound familiar by now?
Within the realms of commerce and trade, we have several more versions of "Canada" and conveniently, those speaking and writing about these things seldom do the reader the favor of adding the word "Incorporated" or "Unincorporated" or giving any other explicit indication of what species of "Canada" they are talking about.
Suffice it to say that any assumption that we are talking about Canada the country when we hear the name or see it written, should be set on a shelf, and careful discernment should be employed instead.
The first international version of "Canada" is the unincorporated government that is supposed to be running the show. Until two years ago, this version of Canada remained a theoretical possibility --until Canadians, like Americans, woke up and declared their proper political status and began organizing their lawful government -- the action they should have undertaken upon the collapse of the old British Commonwealth.
There are now unincorporated Assemblies in each of the Canadian Provinces, run by people who have declared their political status as Canadians, proven their provenance, and undertaken organization of a land and soil jurisdiction government for Canada.
This is the actual means by which people control the government and step into their authority as the employers of all these public employees, and act as the owners of the physical assets of their State or Province.
From the standpoint of the employees, it's more fun and far more profitable if the employees are left in charge to pillage and plunder at will, but this is not the way things are supposed to be according to venerable and binding contracts that are owed to the living people of Canada.
The second version of "Canada" is a British Territorial corporation run by the British Crown called "Canada, Inc.", a public trust management corporation running the so-called National Trust, which is currently collateralized by millions of acres of land actually belonging to Canadians, and the other assets of individual Canadians misrepresented as the estates of Canadian Merchant Mariners, "missing at sea, presumed lost".
These millions of bogus public trust estate trusts have been created with malice aforethought based on undisclosed registration of Canadians as British Citizens.
This is the same unlawful conversion scheme used by Queen Victoria and Benjamin D'Israeli to enfranchise the British Working Class --- as in franchises of Dairy Queen or McDonald's --- to cashier collateral backing the deployment of the British Raj in India.
The same sort of undisclosed and unlawful conversion was achieved in Canada via the "registration" of Canadian babies and latching upon their Given Names as property interests of the British Crown Corp --- all under color of law, in gross Breach of Trust, and without the victims being any the wiser.
This Territorial Subcontractor is military in nature and runs its operations as a military protectorate under the assumption that as there is no Canadian Government run by Canadians forthcoming to replace the Commonwealth, the Crown has the right and obligation to step in and salvage the assets of the former Commonwealth Government.
This, too, is a nasty constructive fraud enforcing a form of Corporate Feudalism on the people of Canada with one hand, while appearing to end British Colonialism with the other.
Colonialism was a form of feudalism applied to lawful persons, while Corporate Feudalism applies to legal persons; changing jurisdictions and further impersonating the victims in no way changes the results: peonage and enslavement of the "subjects", collateralization and securitization of the victim's assets for the benefit of foreign interests.
The third "Canada" --- styled as "CANADA"-- is an "incorporated" entity vested in a Municipal Corporation franchise doing business as CANADA, INC. This franchise of the UNITED STATES, INC. has fallen on hard times, and the parent corporation is in the final throes of bankruptcy, leading to President Donald Trump's suggestion that CANADA, INC. should accept representation as a British Territorial "State of State" Corporation, belonging to "the United States of America, Inc."
That is, they should accept a hostile takeover voluntarily, or be forced into bankruptcy and rolled over anyway.
Trump's comments are basically a forced merger offer from the Receiver of the bankrupt UNITED STATES, INC. and pertains to commercial assets and investments the UNITED STATES, INC. made in CANADA, INC. --- which the Receiver is trying to collect and convert for the benefit of the British Crown Corporation he serves as "President".
The once-and-future problem is that Trump isn't our representative with regard to these matters, and we are the actual Creditors and Persons of Interest, Parties to Contract, and Owners of all actual and physical assets --- the long-lost "progeny' who have "returned from over the sea" and busted the whole identity theft, impersonation, and barratry scheme wide open.
This commercial corporation called CANADA operates like any other large corporation and has the same abilities and limitations. When people say. "Canada is bankrupt!" --- this commercial corporation calling itself CANADA is the entity they are talking about.
How do we know this for sure? It's the only version of "Canada" that is eligible for bankruptcy protection. It's underwritten by the so-called National Trust assets. This is how the Vermin found their way into the back pockets of Canadians and have extracted the value of their labor, their natural resources, their intellectual property, and even claimed the ability to impound their bodies as "cargo" of the National Trust.
This also means, that according to their scheme, Canada, Inc. and millions of dummy corporations "representing" vanished British Merchantmen and their Estate Trusts, become the Receivers when the Municipal Corporation, CANADA, and its millions of Roman Inferior Trusts named after individual Canadians --goes bankrupt.
It's precisely the same model that these Bounders are trying to apply in The United States and use against Americans.
The actual owners, the living people of Canada, are owed complete and total exemption of all charges, costs, and claims as a result of having all their property assets purloined and added to the Canada, Inc. "National Trust", however, the Municipal trusts also operating in the NAMES of these Canadians have purloined their exemptions and misapplied them to their own corporate debts and taxes, instead.
Sovereign nations and countries cannot -- by definition -- ever go bankrupt. They have state immunity from all such claims. They are indemnified, not insured. Their governments are declared, not chartered, not registered. It is not a matter of ownership, which implies a custodial role, but possession -- and inheritance rather than purchase.
Thus, sovereign nations are not eligible for bankruptcy protection and are not "owned" as franchises nor insured by any other country or nation.
Canada, the country and its people, can't go bankrupt. Can't be sold or bought by shareholders of any corporation. Can't be strong-armed by Donald Trump or any other Bankruptcy Receiver or Creditor.
But here's the catch. Canada hasn't had a true national government in its history. The land and soil of Canada have stood "vacant" in the same sense that the land and soil of England have stood vacant; the assemblies of declared Canadians now beginning to operate in each Canadian province are, combined, the only national government Canada has ever had.
As a result of this circumstance, the self-interested British Territorial "National Trust" dba "Canada, Inc." has operated in the foreign jurisdiction of the sea and has collected the assets of Canada and Canadians and used them as collateral to borrow against.
Think of the Canadian National Trust dba Canada, Inc., as a humongous Slush Fund that has been made available to politicians --- paid lobbyists for special interest groups --- to spend.
This has been accomplished via a secretive constructive fraud scheme expedited by members of the Bar Association running incorporated franchise "courts" as private collection agencies, all neatly disguised as public courts.
The identity of the living victims is obscured via repeated impersonations and undisclosed legal operations --- and then barratry is practiced against them and their estates to strip them of their assets, including their basic rights and freedoms.
And yes, all of this has been done to Canadians and over a billion other innocent people by the British Crown Corporation which deserves immediate and permanent liquidation.
The current bankruptcy of CANADA, INC. being misrepresented as being caused by a "National Debt" is nothing at all compared to the actual wealth, resources, and material interests of the country called Canada and its living government, the people of Canada.
And how do we know that the people of Canada are the actual possessors and the actual owners (caretakers) of Canada? How do we know that there is no "National Debt"?
We know that no Legal Fiction can function as a sovereign entity, by definition. We know that Canada has been using a fiat money system based on "notes" --- promissory notes --- for many years; the government services purveyors have been presenting I.O.U's in inequitable exchange for actual goods and services provided by the living people.
The living people of Canada are thus the Creditors, but any standing debt has been cancelled in the exchange.
The actual Debtors, the governmental services purveyors, pass "bills" benefiting themselves and misrepresent their service fees as "taxes" and back-charge their own debts to their Creditors --- resulting in a situation where the Creditors owe the Service Purveyors for services, but the Service Purveyors owe the Creditors far, far more and could never make a profit if the service fees were discharged and the accounts balanced.
The Service Purveyors have prevented this inevitable accounting by impersonating their employers as Municipal Trust franchises named after the individual living Canadians and using these dummy Municipal trusts to purloin the exemptions owed to each living Canadian.
Remember, the individual living people are owed absolute exemption as a result of having all their assets cashiered by Canada, Inc. in a "National Trust".
Those exemptions have been latched onto by the CANADA Municipal Corporation and used to discharge the corporation's debts and taxes instead of benefiting the living Canadians these exemptions are owed to.
It's all a giant swindle perpetuated via undisclosed registrations, unlawful conversions, identity theft via impersonation, human trafficking, asset stripping via barratry in disguised private corporation tribunals, dishonest bookkeeping, double-handed conspiracy against the actual Creditors, compounded false claims in commerce, gross breach of trust, evasion of constitutional service contracts, armed inland piracy on the part of Canada, Inc., illegal securitization of living flesh, peonage and de facto enslavement by the Municipal corporations and personnel that owe the victims, the actual Creditors, "good faith service" throughout.
Recently, more spurious claims have been made based on Article 4, Section 3, Clause 1, of the defunct Articles of Confederation, creating a "perpetual union" of commercial "states of states" known as "Confederate States" and operating as the States of America.
Section 11 of this hoary document identifies "Canada" as part of this commercial Confederation of "states" --- but this entire document is referring to "Confederate States" --- which in the realm of commerce refers to "states of states", not actual States.
Refer to the definitions section of the Uniform Commercial Code for an understanding of what a "state of state" is, and realize that these legal fiction business entities were also referred to as confederate or Confederate "States" in this part of the world. All these state-of-state operations are commercial corporations by definition, so the entity that was included under Section 11 was an earlier version of Canada, Inc. or a direct instrumentality.
We know this for sure, because the Municipal entities operating as CANADA, INC. were not created yet in 1781 and would not take shape until 1871. Subsequent addition of the Municipal franchises would have had to take place after that date, and by then, the Articles of Confederation themselves were defunct, rendered meaningless because the Confederation doing business as the States of America itself ceased operations due to lack of quorum in March of 1861.
Our point is that our Confederation of States-of-States is defunct and has been defunct for a very long time; it has never been reconstructed by the actual States of the Union, and for various reasons, cannot be resurrected by any corporation or foreign personnel --- and if it could have been accomplished by someone like Donald Trump or any other "President" of the United States of America, Incorporated, it would have been done a long time ago.
The British Territorial Government represented by the British Crown Corporation franchise calling itself the United States of America, Incorporated, never had a " Federal Republic" of its own to "restore" and it certainly has no standing or ability to restore our Federal Republic. That task, like the restoration of the Confederation, belongs to the States of the Union which are in General Session now.
Rather, the British Territorial entity calling itself the United States of America (and conveniently "forgetting" to add the word "Incorporated") immorally and illegally usurped upon our Federal Republic on February 2nd 1871, and without any proper public Notice acted upon a claim on abandonment to "salvage" the assets of our Federal Republic which at the time was doing business as the United States (Corporation).
They usurped upon delegated powers never entrusted to them and began making dispositions of property that was not abandoned, not theirs, and never "won" by any action of "war" --- another excuse often given for their Gross Breach of Trust -- because the so-called American Civil War was never actually a war. It was a Mercenary Conflict unable to sustain a conquest claim.
So.
Apparently, Donald Trump is making an attempt to "finish the job" and establish a claim that we acquiesced to having the British Territorial Interlopers occupy and run our Federal Republic, but we did not agree to this deceitful substitution in 1871 and we do not agree to it now.
Apparently, too, Donald Trump is pretending to "represent" us as the Receiver of the Municipal Corporation bankruptcy, when in fact the existence of the Municipal Corporation and the individual trusts attached to it, like the British Territorial Seaman's Estates and the American Infant Decedent Estates operated under our given names, and all other derivative underlying dummy public interest corporations --- have all been created under conditions of fraud and deceit by undeclared British Crown operatives.
We never gave them permission to represent us in these matters, much less permission to misrepresent us.
Mr. Trump's "offer" to subsume the Municipal Corporation franchise dba "CANADA" or bankrupt the civil service portion of the Canadian Government is being misinterpreted as tantamount to an act of war against the country and people of Canada.
Trump's offer to take over CANADA, INC. is not even taking place in the land and soil jurisdiction; it is, rather, an effort to settle a difficult and contentious bankruptcy of a parent corporation and franchises that should never have existed.
All assets should be returned to the actual Creditors and Parties of Interest --- the living people of Canada and the lawful government they have now formed to operate the land and soil jurisdiction of their country.
This British Crown Corporation in its entirety should be nationalized or else dissolved for its part in promoting fraud and denigration of the people it was obligated to serve in good faith.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
May 27th 2025
---------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
