Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Why You Can't Be Your Own Mother

By Anna Von Reitz

I titled this article to get your attention.  It is obvious, to most of us anyway, that we can't function as our own Mother, though it seems that I must now belabor that point.  

There are simply some things that we can't do for ourselves, and there are other things, like peeing, that nobody else can do for us.  This is built into the web of our physical existence and is not subject to change. 

So.  Having squared that away, I will next observe that Federal Employees and Dependents cannot create the Federal Republic, for the same reason that we cannot act as our own Mothers.  

Federal Employees and Dependents by definition lack the legal and lawful standing to re-create the "missing part" of our Federal Government, known as the Federal Republic.  

Re-creating the Federal Republic is a multi-step process requiring participation by multiple other entities.  

First, the American States and People have to assemble and bring their States of the Union into Session to conduct business.  

That hasn't been done since the Civil War and has proven to be quite a Goat Roping Contest, thanks to misguided efforts by our Employees to incapacitate us and identify us as employees just like them--- and therefore, just as helpless to do the necessary work of Reconstruction.  

So that has had to be overcome, with the People forced to formally declare their political status and to "re-populate" their States on paper -- States that they never left in fact. 

All right, consider that part done.  

The American People have responded, have declared themselves to be Americans acting in the capacity of American State Citizens, our fifty States have been re-populated accordingly, and the State Assemblies have been called into Session.  

That's steps one, two, and three ---- (1) Declaration; (2) Acceptance of State Citizenship; (3) Setting up State Assemblies and calling into Session. 

Next, the State Assemblies must take care of housekeeping business and formally enroll all the Western States that have been left in limbo pending their final acceptance as States of the Union. 

Next, each State must create its own new "State of State" organization.  For example, New Hampshire has to create (or as it is, re-create) The State of New Hampshire, to do business for New Hampshire, as part of the re-instated Confederation of States. 

This requires re-writing the original Constitution of each American State of State that existed prior to the Civil War, and in the case of the new western State members, writing a first-ever American State-level Constitution, because all these States have ever known is a British Territorial version acting as a place-holder. 

Finally, with all the members of the Confederation of States reconstructed, it is their responsibility to re-launch the Federal Republic owed to Americans under the provisions of The Constitution for the united States of America. 

We are a little better than half-way home, somewhere between second and third base.  

There are those who think that they can hurry this process along by using Federal Citizens to fill the ranks of fake "assemblies" --- and pull another fast one on the American People.  

RuSA and the so-called "National Assembly" groups think that they can do this, but they don't understand the actual law. 

If they did, they'd already know that their efforts are doomed and that they lack the standing required to complete the legitimate reconstruction process.  

Federal citizens of either stripe, Territorial or Municipal, cannot restore the Federal Republic for the same reason that you can't function as your own Mother. 

So, as it behooves everyone in this country to get it straight and get it done, join and support your actual State Assembly and take the steps necessary to properly declare your political status, either as an American State National or as an American State Citizen.  

Having thus reclaimed your own lawful standing as an American and being enabled to act in the proper capacity, you can "re-constitute" --- that is, reconstruct, your American State of State organization, reclaim the assets of the Federal State Trusts, and restore the Federal Republic.  

Not until.  

So, Mr. President--- if you want our assistance in this otherwise impossible to accomplish feat, you have it.  It behooves you, your Administration, the members of the military, and the members of the Federal Civil Service to get the lead out and help us do what has to be done.  

Because we are the only ones that can act as your Mother.  


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.


Found Here:

Florida Department of Health saboteurs are RIGGING coronavirus test results, wildly inflating infection numbers to hobble reopening efforts

A stunning investigation by Orlando Fox News affiliate Fox 35 finds that the Florida Department of Health is reporting suspiciously high “positive” rates from dozens of COVID-19 testing labs in Florida, often in contradiction to the real numbers that those labs reported to the state. This appears to indicate a massive, coordinated conspiracy by State of Florida workers in the Florida Department of Health who are attempting to sabotage the reopening efforts by wildly exaggerating the number of infections for political purposes.

Read the entire article here:

The IRS Supreme Court Cases

By Anna Von Reitz

Today, I have received a most extraordinary document: the history of the IRS in Supreme Court Cases, assembled as a list, from one of my readers.  It's a brilliant summation done in an extraordinarily succinct way. 

The documented history of the IRS in this country goes back to the Civil War, when they were hired as privateers to interrupt and blockade Confederate shipping.  They operated as the original pirates of the Caribbean did, offshore, on island bases, from the Outer Banks of North Carolina, eastward to the Bahamas, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Cuba, around Florida and the Caribbean proper.  

They were pirates for hire then, and they are pirates for hire now. 

Their history in Europe has been documented back to the early 1100's, when they were first organized as armed enforcement for the Dominican Order, which was running the Inquisition at the time.  The Church of Rome had decreed a Special Offering known as Peter's Pence, to be collected once a year on April 15, as a percentage of income for the prior year, supposedly to defray the cost of the Crusades in the Holy Land. 

Does that sound familiar? 

This particular organization, the Internal Revenue Service, has been engaged in bilking the public to pay for mercenary and holy wars (yet another oxymoron) for a very long time.  And yes, the entire apparatus of the Roman Pontiff, the City of Rome, the Romanus Pontifex, the Vatican, the various constructs of the Holy Roman Empire, and the Holy See are very much to blame for all of this ---- for conceiving this system of oppression in the name of God,  for implementing it, for protecting it, for practicing it --- and continuing it into the modern era. 

Why do I particularly blame the Church--- especially when the Pope's Municipal Government ostensibly fought for the Confederacy?  Because his tax collectors fought for the North, and his Overseer of the Commonwealth, the British King, was following the Pope's instructions to employ the Internal Revenue Service against the South. 

"Internal" to what, we should ask?  Apparently, the Holy See, which runs the Municipal United States theocracy.  

One is reminded of the advice of 2 Corinthians 11: 1-15, and the words of St. Paul about those who come "in the name of" Jesus (or should we properly translate his name as Joshua?) but preach a "different Jesus" and a different Gospel, too.  A deceptive substitution, not unlike what Eve faced in the Garden: 

"But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ."  

The Internal Revenue Service employed by the Territorial Government spells its name out in full, while the IRS employed by the Municipal Government uses abbreviated alphabet soup code: IRS.  

They both work for the same Master and play both ends against the middle.  

Subtle, indeed. A deceit known to the players, designed to keep the victims confused throughout, set up so that if the IRS doesn't get you, the Internal Revenue Service will, and neither one of them have the least little bit of authority to address you at all.  

They are just running a racketeering scheme on your shores under color of law, and claiming that you owe them for this service.  

And you are doing what?  Sitting in your living room, in your Laz-E-Boy recliner thinking --- "Rubbish! That can't be so!" --- but it is the truth, nonetheless, and the longer you sit there not believing it (and therefore doing nothing about it) the worse it gets.   

The privateers operating the offshore blockade against the Confederacy simply came ashore after the Civil War ended and went to work for BOTH sides of the non-existent conflict.  I say, "non-existent" because both sides were ultimately employed by the same man, Pope Pius IX.  

All that blood, all that waste, all master-minded and created by one of our own dear Federal Subcontractors, playing a little two-fisted game with himself at the expense of his Allies and Employers and Parishioners, too.   

And they were getting ready to do it again.

But I digress.  

Here is the meat of the story, and I cannot take credit for assembling it in this fashion though I have often enough discussed individual cases--- a compilation of all the United States Supreme Court Cases that have overturned and exposed the venal nature of "the Internal Revenue Service"--- first presented by the Freedom Law School at its historic "Hearing on Taxation" held in Washington, DC over a decade ago: 

1. Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.Co., 240 U. S, 1.11 (1916)

2. Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U.S. 581,20 S.Ct. 448 (1900)

3. Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700; U.S. v. Cathcart, 25 F.Case No. 14,756

4. Stanton v. Baltic Minning Company 240 U.S. 103, 112 (1919)

5. Bowers v Kerbaugh-Empire 271 U.S. 170, 174,174 (1926); In re Charge to Grand Jury, 30 F. Case No. 18,273 (65 C.J. Section 2) -- not known to be overturned. NOTICE OF DISHONOR: 06/15/2017 Page 6 of 9.

6. Peck v Lowe 247 U.S.165, 173 (1918)

7. Doyle v Mitchell Bros. 247 U. S. 179,183 (1918)

8. Eisner v Macomber 252 U. S. 179, 183 (1918)

9. Evans v Gore 253 U.S. 245(1920)

10. Flint v Stone Tracy Co. 220 U.S. 107, 144,151-152, 165,55 S L.ed. 107419 Sup CCL Rep 342, Ann Cas. 1912B 1312(1911)

11. Merchants Loan And Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U.S. 509519 (1921)

12. Helvering v Edison Brothers' Stone, 8th Cir. 133 F2d 575 (1943)

13. Southern Pacific v Lowe 247 U.S. 330, 335 (1918): Art 1, Sec. 8, Cl17 And Art.IV, Sec. 3 CL 2: Art. 1 Sec. 8 Cl. 17: Art. IV Sec. 3 Cl. 15 USC 1681h: 28 U.S.C. 1333 or 1337: False Claims Act, see 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(7)

14. UNITED STATES v MERKSKY 361 U.S. 431, 438(1960)

15. CALIFORNIA BANKERS ASSN. v SCHULZ 419 U.S.21, 26 (1974)

16. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORP v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380,384 (1947)

17. Utah Power & Light Co v. United States, 391

18. United States v. Stewart, 108 re Floyd Acceptance, 7: Wall 666; Article 1 Sec.2: Art. 1 Sec.9

19. Knowlton v Moore, 178 U.S. 41, 47(1900); 19 CFR 351, 102

20. Butcher's Union Co. v Cresent City Co. 111 U.S. 746, 756 (1884)

21. TRUAX v CORRIGAN 257 U.S. 312,348 (1921)

22. Sims v Abrens 167 Ark. 557271 S.W. 720, 773 (1925)

23. Myer v STATE OF NEBRASKA 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923)

24. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall 36

25. Butchers' Union Co. v Crescent City Co. 4 Sup Ct. 652

26. Vick Wo v Hopkins 6 Sup Ct. 1064

27. Minnesota v Barer 10 Sup Ct 862

28. Allegeyer v Lousiana 17 Sup Ct. 427

29. Lochner v New York 25 Sup Ct. 539, 3 Ann Cas 1133

30. Twining v New Jersey 29 Sup Ct. 14

31. Chicago B&O R.R. v. McGuire 31 Sup Ct. 259

32. Truax v Raich 36 Sup Ct. 7, L.R.A.1916D, 545 Ann. Cas. 1917B 283.

33. Adams v Tanner 37 Sup Ct. 662 L.R.A.1917F, 1163, Ann. Cas. 1917D 973

34. New York Life Ins. Co v Dodge 38 Sup Ct. 337, Ann Cas. 1918E,593

35. Traux v Corrigan 42 Sup Ct. 124

36. Adkins v Children's Hospital 43 Sup Ct. 394,67 L. Ed (April 9, 1923)

37. Wyeth v Cambridge Board Of Health 200 Mass 474,86 N. E. 925, 128 Am St. Rep. 43923 L. R. A. (N.S.) 147

38. MURDOCK v COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 319 U.S. 105, 113; 63 Sup Ct. 875; 87 L Ed 1298 (1943)

39. Tyler et al Administrators v. United States, 281 US 497, 502 (1930)

40. Pollock v Farmers' Loan And Trust Co. 157 U.S. 429, 442, 555, 556, 573, 582, 595 (1895)


42. Main v Grand Trunk R. Co. 35 L.ed 994, 3 Inters. Com.Rep. 807, 12 Sup Ct. Rep. , As interpreted in Galveston, H&S A.R. Co. v. Texas, 52 S.L. ed. 1031, 1037, 28 Sup Ct. Rep. 638: 

At this time, Defense presented one of the arguments provided by Long's Research Foundation studies. They read to the jury the Mission Statement of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, which states that the income tax relies upon “VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE” and a quote from the head of the Alcohol Tobacco Tax Division of the IRS, WHICH, IN ESSENCE, SHOWED THAT THE INCOME TAX IS 100% VOLUNTARY, AS OPPOSED TO THE ALCOHOL TAX, WHICH IS 100% ENFORCED. NOTICE OF DISHONOR: 06/15/2017 Page 7 of 9. 

43. U. S. v WHITRIDGE 231 U. S. 231 U. s. 144, 147(1913)

44. Taft v BOWERS 278 U.S. 470,481 (1929)

45. COPPAGE v STATE OF KANSAS 236 U.S.l, 23-24(1915)

46. U. S. v. Constantine 296 U.S. 287(1935?) IRS Ruled Unconstitutional As Prohibition Had Been Repealed. 

In 1965 The United States Supreme Court traced the IRS back to the Civil
War (as we did, also) and found no legislative Act Of Congress lawfully establishing the IRS as a Federal agency, department or anything else. 

For still more juicy tidbits, go to Paul Andrew Mitchell (Federal Witness)
website   and read over the 31 Questions.

Please note that no IRS publications carry an Office of Management and Budget form number, meaning that they are admittedly not a U.S. Government entity. 

And finally, the coup de grace:  U.S. v. Lloyde R. Long, FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT, ALABAMA, Case 1-93-91, and the famous Shreveport, Louisiana victory in the Tommy Cryer case, in which he successfully maintained that no power to tax a man's time on Earth exists. 

The IRS and the Internal Revenue Service are both operating as foreign privateers on our shores, carrying out an illegal "war" that actually ended more than 150 years ago, still pillaging and plundering the American People, who were the dupes and victims throughout.  

So, still sitting in your Laz-E-Boy thinking that I am blowing smoke up your butt for fun?  

"Your" members of Congress are allowing this to go on, year after year, decade after decade, and you are content to let them "represent" you?  If that's true, and you knowingly allow this, and let your employees condone this, then you are a willing accomplice to their crimes against other Americans.

Your inaction makes you a war criminal and a traitor. 

Finally, we get to the really interesting part.  How, my Reader wanted to know, is it possible that all these Supreme Court cases and all this evidence exists, and nothing has been done?  

As neither the IRS nor the Internal Revenue Service are part of the government (see above) the government has no authority to put these organizations out of business or demand change in their operations unless they are clearly operating in a criminal fashion.  

After nearly fifty Supreme Court cases, the "government" still isn't convinced that anything untoward has been going on. The House Oversight Subcommittee is responsible, and has done nothing. 

As I told my reader, it has proven extraordinarily difficult to get Congress--Municipal or Territorial-- to slap the hands of its own bill collectors. 

Second, all these decisions are in the nature of "negative law" --- proving what isn't true, striking down particular cases and instances, but not establishing "positive law" that could be used to enforce against the activities of the Internal Revenue Service and the IRS, both. 

This is one of the limiting aspects of the Supreme Court's authority, which is strictly in the negative --- an ability to strike down, but no ability to create law. 

Meantime, guess who is sitting there like a Fat Toad in a Fly Factory, not creating any new law to rein in the activities of the IRS and Internal Revenue Service?  All the slime-sucking politicians. 

That's right, the members of "Congress" --- both Territorial and Municipal, the same people wearing both hats, glutting themselves either way. 

Every time I see Nancy Pelosi talking about the "poor" while she cheats them out of the fruits of their own labors, I experience involuntary retching; every time I see Mitch McConnell's supercilious face talking about farmers and hometowns, I want to hurl my breakfast.  

If you are sickened, too, it's time to dust off your Employer ID and take action.

It's your Public Duty to put an end to this travesty.  I will say it again ---take aim and umbrage against these evils, or you are an accomplice to it.  Cowards are on The List for destruction in Revelation 21. 

After all, folks, that's what motivated me.  I knew that if I didn't get off my duff and take action to stop the crime, I'd be an accomplice to it.  And so will you, if you just sit there, curled up in a fetal position in your recliner, muttering, "She can't be right." --- in the face of dozens of Supreme Court rulings. 

Go to:  Get started now. 


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.