Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 5100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Thursday, February 27, 2020

Deals With the Devil


By Anna Von Reitz

Here is a good example of how it works:

Evergreen, Inc., is a CIA-owned company.  

That means it is a subcontractor of a subcontractor (CIA) of a subcontractor (UNITED STATES, INC.) of a Subcontractor (E PLURIBUS UNUM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.) of a Subcontractor, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, INC., of a Subcontractor, the MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, of a Subcontractor, The United States of America, Inc., of a Subcontractor, the GOVERNMENT OF SCOTLAND, INC., of a Subcontractor, SCOTLAND, INC, a subcontractor of the franchise of the Bank of Scotland, LLC., doing business as a subcontractor of HSBC, PLC., doing business as a Subcontractor of UK, INC., doing business as a Subcontractor of Vatican City. PLC., a Subcontractor doing business as the Urban Trust,PLC, doing business as a Subcontractor of the UPU, INC., doing business as a Subcontractor of Vatican City, LLC, doing business as The Peace Trust, Inc., doing business as a Subcontractor of The City of Rome, Inc., acting as a Subcontractor of the Holy Family of the Inquistion, Inc., doing business as a Subcontractor of the Societe of Holy Doctrine, Inc., doing business as a Subcontractor of the Holy See, Inc, which is a subcontractor of Cede and Company, Inc., and that is a subcontractor of the UN, CORP, which is a Subcontractor of FRANCISCUS which is a Subcontractor of Francis I, which is a Subcontractor of The Holy See. 

And now you have a bird’s eye view of how interlocking interest organizations (IIO’s) work. 

And, please bear in mind, that at each step of subcontracting process, the accountability of each subcontractor diminishes relative to the actual contract—- and what have you got? 

You have Evergreen Inc., owned and operated by Evergreen, LLC, which is owned and operated by Evergreen, PLC.

4500 employees, no obligation to file flight plans (Hint, Hint) and you have a totally unaccountable self-interested for profit corporation abusing the powers of “government”. 

Evergreen makes money delivering contraband for the CIA, by stabbing lucrative firefighting contracts, and..... by spraying chem trails wastes —- incendiary industrial wastes—- that kill trees (and create fodder for fires) and that leave explosive deposits of metallic elements and oxides layered over the landscape. 

See how this works? 

Set up the fires at a profit and then make money fire-fighting, too. 

Create the problem (and get paid by the Vatican) and then solve the problem and get paid by the victims, too. 

And here we sit, paying for it all. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Private sale 2002 Gold American Eagle 1 Ounce Coin.

This American Eagle Gold coin is a consignment from a local friend. If you express an interest in this coin I will send his contact info and you can deal with him directly.

I know he will accept a cashiers check and you can negotiate the price with him. There will be no commission to me on this one.  If you are interested send me an email at pstramer@gmail.com



Are You Committed? To What?


By Anna Von Reitz

Recently, just the last few days, efforts by what I call “Team America”—- my Readers and our Supporters worldwide, have made some truly stellar progress. 

One of the Giant Leaps is our new understanding of yet more legalese applied to both politics and what Jon Rappoport calls “the fake science of psychiatry”—-the word is:”Commitment”

John Adams famously said that commitment is the fundamental virtue of a patriot— but in this case, the same word is being used in two other and different senses: 

(1) “commitment” as in a financial commitment,   Debt, or obligation and; 
(2) “commitment” as in “being committed to a sanatorium or in-patient mental health care facility”. 

As I reported some months ago, we are seeing a rash of sudden and gigantic “tax” bills being presented by the IRS and other incorporated entities —- and we noted that unlike any other such charges in the past, these Billings, Liens, etc, plainly reference assertions that the debtor is “pledged” or made a “pledge” resulting in the referenced charges. 

Pledging is an ancient feudal act in which a Serf pledges fealty to a sovereign and it is utterly foreign to the American form of government.  So, you, as an American, would never naturally have any reason or cause to be pledged or to make a pledge, would you? 

No. The plain fact of the matter is that the result of The War of Independence left you the sovereign of this land and soil. 

So what is going on here?  The Great Fraud. 

Someone else has “pledged” you and acted “for” you to obligate you in this manner—- and conveniently, never told you a word about it. 

First they “committed” you in the hospital sense of the word as a “ward” of the British Territorial State of State—instead of recognizing you as an American. 

Then, they “committed” you financially as a ward of their State of State organization.  

They unlawfully, illegally, immorally, and in gross breach of trust “pledged” you— and everything you own— as chattel backing their debts. 

And that is why you are getting these huge out of the blue “tax” bills referencing “pledges” you never made.  They defaulted and so, their creditors are coming after you. 

It’s like you co-signed a loan for Cousin Bubba, without knowing that you did so.  Twenty years later some Third Party shows up and says, “The balance on this Is due and owing.” 

So notice it all hinges on this one word: commitment. 

Are you “committed” as a patriot?  Claiming your birthright political status as an American? 

Or are you “committed” as a Ward of the British Territorial State of State and knowingly and voluntarily acting as a U.S. Citizen? 

Or are you “committed” financially as a PERSON——that is, as a Municipal “citizen of the United States”? 

Interestingly, all these so-called COURTS and Courts have no actual valid contract with you or relevant valid cause to “presume” any of what they are presuming about you. They are bluffing and acting under color of law.  So how do you call them on it? 

Obviously, by reclaiming your political status as an American.  Most likely you are not and never were a British Territorial U.S. Citizen (the political status of someone born in Puerto Rico) and would have no reason to adopt that status, either, as it offers no benefit over your own natural State National or State Citizen status.  Some Americans adopt this status temporarily while in military service, but once they get their DD214, most of them are anxious to return home to civilian status! 

You have to Declare and Record your choice of political status.  And that requires affirmative action on your part.  That is Job One and if you do this BEFORE you get a tax bill, the more credible and less self-serving your claim of exemption appears.

So, get off your rumps and declare your political status as an American. It costs a few bucks and considerable paper pushing but nothing compared to paying one of these default tax bills, believe me. 

Have your ducks and paperwork in order and be prepared to go to court. 

These Courts are all foreign and bluffing and acting under color of law— so, getting back to how do you call them on it? 

Ask them if they have a wet-ink Judicial Warrant of Commitment for the Defendant? And if so, can it be brought forward as admissible evidence and placed on the public record of the court? 

The answer to both questions is —-no. 

They don’t and they can’t.  

Move to dismiss (“Move” not “Motion”)with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

If they avoid Due Process and try to “latch” your private property via commercial liens against their own fictitious PERSON, send them a “Credit Collection Letter”. 

If you think about it—- they send Debt Collection Letters to you, but what do they already owe you?  Credit, which you have already earned as Joe, the Hamburger Man. 

So send a copy of their bill back to them attached to a “Credit Collection Letter”.  This is a simple statement to the effect that you are claiming your exemption under the Public Law and attempting to collect credit owed to you and you are returning this Credit Collection Letter as a Secured Third Party Priority Creditor for Mutual Offset Credit Exchange.

Send this Registered Mail to entity billing you and to the appropriate officials. 

And who are they? 

If the entity billing you used acronyms or is a Municipal COURT—- like IRS or UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT — send your Credit Collection Letter back to them and an original signed copy to the Vicar General responsible for your Municipal District.

If the entity billing you uses Upper and Lower case, like: Internal Revenue Service or State of Michigan Circuit Court, send your Credit Collection Letter in multiple signed originals (always using your protected Signature —“All Rights Reserved”) to: (1) the entity that billed you; (2) the Commissioner of Natural Resources for the State of State,  and (3) the State Attorney General. 

So they have billed you, and you have billed them, and the issue is zeroed out. 

The actual End Game solution to all this craziness and fraud is for you to “commit” to the principles of Self-Governance and the exercise of your Natural and Unalienable Rights, by joining (and if necessary, organizing) your State Assembly. 

Doing so puts teeth back into the American Way and re-establishes the enforcement of the Federal Constitution.  It says in big, bold letters— “I am an American and I know who I am and why.  I am fully “committed” to my State of the Union and owe no obligation or allegiance to any other foreign monarch, state, principality or power.  

It’s up to you to settle any question about what you are committed to.  Go to: wwwTheAmericanStatesAssembly.net and get started today! 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Corona Virus Doesn't Add Up


By Anna Von Reitz

Masks don't work on viruses, generally speaking.  There are some very special masks that do work, but they are extremely expensive and hard to come by and have to be replaced every few hours. The supplies that do exist are needed for the researchers and medical professionals, So forget about masks. 

Instead, take the idea of hand washing to a new level and learn to not only wash hands but safeguard your hands and nasal passages by applying dilute essential oil like a body oil to your hands and swab around the edge of your nostrils. 

Remembering that essential oils are very powerful and need to be diluted at least 1:10, add a few drops of traditional spice oil, such as cloves or cinnamon, or eucalyptus or tea tree or oregano essential oil, to a gentle carrier oil like olive oil, almond oil or avocado oil.  This will kill bacteria and viruses, both, and provide a lasting layer of protection for hours afterward. 

So-- put on a "liquid mask" and forget the operating theater look. 

The epidemiology results coming off this outbreak are weird.  By far, the majority (95%) of cases are mild -- like the common cold.  About 5% of all cases develop severe pneumonia-like symptoms and may require oxygen and other intervention.  The overall death rate is pegging in at about 2%, with small children and the elderly taking the worst of it. 

So -- objectively, nothing about this amounts to an "emergency" meriting quarantine.  To put things in perspective -- we have had zero deaths from Corona virus, and in a bad year, plain old flu takes out 70,000 people across America.  

It's looking more and more like Jon Rappoport is right --- again, that this is just another Big Lie and furor designed to bilk investors in so-called "Pandemic Bonds" and dupe and entertain the public with fear-mongering.  The question then becomes -- what are they trying to hide? 

Well, the USA, Inc. just missed a payment deadline.  The theft of Falcone's money is rising to the top again.  More holes are appearing in the excuses that the Administrative Courts have been using to attack Americans.  Numerous huge court settlements are ripe for enforcement.  The Dems have a vested interest in using any means possible to tank the Trump economy.  The issues surrounding the quote-unquote Legacy Trusts are coming forward.  And Americans are waking up by the bucket load.  

If I were in Washington, DC, right now, I'd "be afraid, be very afraid" but not of the Corona virus. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Prosecute the Prosecutor


By Anna Von Reitz

Day after day I get these pitiful letters and emails. It's some helpless widow, a great-grandma like me, and the vermin have got hold of her by some ruse, and now they are shaking her down like terriers shaking a rat. And now, at the 11th hour, the victims come seeking help.
It's impossible --- literally --- for me to get involved in all the court actions. I can give you generalized information and pointers and hope that you are listening, bearing in mind that every case and situation is different. I can give you my insights into the common mistakes that are made.
Your first job is to declare and record your proper political status. It should be done now, before one of these courts even starts to address you. It will stand as evidence of who you are and in what capacity you are acting. This is like ammo stored up for hunting season.
Your second job is to join your State Assembly and take up the work of an active State Citizen. Why is this important? Because there is strength in numbers and deliverance from this tyranny in your own hands. Once you fill your jury pools and elect your Sheriffs and Justices of the Peace, the foreign courts are obligated to step down and not address you, unless you actually and factually stray into their very limited foreign jurisdictions.
That said, the most common mistakes made when interacting with these felons is that we don't state our counterclaims and counteroffers from the get-go, and we don't prosecute their Prosecutors.
The Prosecutor thinks its his job to prosecute you, but in fact, by addressing you, he has made it your job to prosecute him.
He is the one bringing any complaint against you, so he is the one you have to cross-examine and bring your firepower to bear on ---- and most of the time, he's just a dumb schmuck doing what he has been trained to do by rote.
In order to effectively and efficiently nail a Prosecutor, you have to hone your ability to ask pointed questions, bearing in mind that you can never get into trouble in a court room by politely asking questions.
"Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT a person?"
uh, uh, ummmm….
"Mr. Prosecutor.... can you explain to the Court exactly what kind of person the DEFENDANT is?"
Uh, uh, ummmm….
"Mr. Prosecutor....you have used an unusual style convention to name the DEFENDANT in all capital letters ---- is the DEFENDANT's NAME written in Latin or something made to appear like Latin?"
Uh, well, uh, I …. no, that's just the way we do it, uh....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... were you aware that writing the DEFENDANT's name in all capital letters has a meaning indicating that the DEFENDANT is either a dead man's estate, a corporation, or a trademark?"
Umm-uh, I never heard anything like that...
"Mr. Prosecutor.... may we let the record show the Chicago Manuel of Style attributes meaning to the use of all capital letters to name the DEFENDANT on page.... (give your citation and edition, etc.)?
Well, uh, I, we-uh, I mean I was unaware....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT a trademark?"
Uh, no, not that I know of....
Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT dead?"
Uh, uh, oh-uh, well, uh....
Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT a corporation?
Uh-duh, wha--uh....
[If he admits that it is...] "Mr. Prosecutor.... what kind of corporation is the DEFENDANT?"
Ah, ah, ah.....
"Mr. Prosecutor, what evidence do you have that the DEFENDANT exists?"
I-uh, we-uh, well-uh.....
"Mr. Prosecutor, can you please bring your evidence demonstrating probable cause that the DEFENDANT exists and submit this evidence on the Public Record of the Court....?
Aye, aye, uh, cough, cough, blanch...
"Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT allowed to do business in this state?"
Bhelf, uh, oh, uh....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT being represented by a Board of Directors?"
Oh, uh,.....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... if you had a problem with the DEFENDANT, why didn't you address your charges to the Board of Directors or the CEO of the corporation?"
uh-uh-uh-uh....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... what I am trying to get to is, why is this DEFENDANT being sent mail to my mailing address?"
Buh, wuh, I-uh, well, isn't it obvious....?
"Mr. Prosecutor.... where is the probable cause that I have anything to do with the DEFENDANT---other than having a somewhat similar name?"
Ah, well, uh...
"Mr. Prosecutor... are you aware that the DEFENDANT's name has appeared as a Traded Security and brokerage account?"
um, um, um, um-ah....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... you have named this DEFENDANT and sent mail (or process servers or officers) addressed to it at my address, is that not true?
Well, uh, yes, I suppose that occurred... uh...
"Mr. Prosecutor.... you are obviously aware that I am not an incorporated entity and not a Traded and Bonded Security, either, correct?"
Of course, not... I can see that... uh....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... can you please provide the Court and submit to the Public Record any evidence that you have amounting to probable cause for you to think that the DEFENDANT is connected to me or voluntarily represented by me in any capacity?
Ah, ah,....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... can you demonstrate and explain to the court exactly why you addressed this DEFENDANT in this manner?"
Well, yes. It's required by our style guidelines....
"Mr. Prosecutor.....
You see my point. Once you fully grasp what the Person/PERSON they are addressing really is, you can run laps around them and reduce them to blithering idiots in front of a judge on this one point alone, because (1) most of them don't know what they are doing or why, they have just been trained to "do it this way" and (2) they have been caught in something that is obviously shady, and (3) for those who do know the scam, they can't admit it, can they? So they wind up looking completely incompetent.
"I move the court to dismiss for failure to state a case, failure to identify the nature and identities of the Parties being addressed, and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."
Put yourself in the guise of an investigator, someone who has landed in this peculiar World of Oz environment of the courtroom, and Mr. Prosecutor is the one person in the room who is obligated to answer all your questions about the whole circumstance, because that's what he is.
He is the one bringing charges, so it is his job to know who or what the DEFENDANT is, and everything else about the circumstance. It is his burden of proof to support everything he says and does.
So, batten up, and role play with each other. Now you know the game and it is just a matter of asking them questions they can't or won't answer.
Learn to make everything into a question and learn to recognize and rebut their language cues --- for example, you may address them as "Mr." but never let them address you using such a title.
They may say that you are a "resident" of whatever town or county or state; always "take exception" to this. You don't reside anywhere or maintain a "residence" in any fictional State of State. You have a house and you live in your State. Period.
The identity and nature of the DEFENDANT is just one small point that you can and should drill home. I've seen Prosecutors run from courtrooms after four or five such pointed questions. Very few of them will let it get down to any discussion of the actual meaning and use of DOG LATIN, because it is damaging to the court and to their own professional credentials.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.