Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Thursday, October 10, 2019

Ewww! Half a Billion Stolen From Our Collective "Income Taxes"

By Anna Von Reitz

Most people don't know this, but the "Income tax" got its start during the 1100's, with an "obligatory tithe" on "income" called "Peter's Pence", which was collected in Britain and France by the Inquisition every April 15th, to support the cost of wars in the Middle East --- the Crusades.  

Sound familiar?  

So here we learn that a half billion has been improperly siphoned from our "Peter's Pence" funds --- all the loot taken from us as "Income Taxes" under false pretenses and presumption that we are "voluntarily" adopting Municipal United States political status as "citizens of the United States" and that we are all members of the Municipal religious cult, too.
Well, here's your "Holy Cause" as stated by FDR during his First Inaugural Address--- which will make more sense now that you know the history of "Peter's Pence" ---- however, apparently, the current Church thinks that this money is being set aside for purposes other than making war, as you will gather from the comments in this video:  

It looks like a scheme to set up a new bank in the Inner City of London, plus Benefits, of course.  

Which gives us pause, because the Vatican and its various affiliates already have any number of banks all over the world.  Why misappropriate half a billion of income taxes (that most of us never owed) to buy another bank building under the auspices of Westminster?  

How very strange. 

It all makes me ill to consider how many people have been unknowingly and unwillingly enslaved and suffered in peonage to this scam, and for what?  

Let's bring them all forward and question them?  

What, at the end of the day, was all this criminality about?  


See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

My Reply to More Questions --- Purportedly from Flag Officers

By Anna Von Reitz

I have been assured that I am corresponding with a liaison for the Flag Officers of this country, and there has been some corroboration of that, but I am beginning to think that my leg is being pulled. If this is indicative of the level of knowledge possessed by military officers at the Flag level, we are all in a lot of trouble. See for yourselves:
From Flags:
I don't know where to begin except to say this Judge Anna woman needs help. Some serious help because she shouldn't believe the crap she writes and spews as it makes her seem to be a very delusional person. Maybe someone is feeding her this crap and she bought into it. We pray she gets some help. Paul, I will only communicate with you so at least you know of the truth do, document and we share - and it's free Plus, POTUS and Barr are very aware of what we have done and what's in queue.
From Anna:
Then why is it that Senior JAG Officials agree with me and not with you? Why is it that they have told everyone the truth --- that there have been hundreds if not thousands of such "Arbitration Awards" over the years, and not one of them fulfilled? I am aware of this. Why aren't you, if you are such an expert?
Where were you when General Roy took the Farm Union Cases to the United States Supreme Court? Why do I know what they told him and you don't? Face it, you just got involved in all this ---at most 3-4 years ago-- and you are trying to assert that you know more about it than someone who has spent more than forty years studying this situation. Keep going on like this, and you will continue to be utterly useless and also in dereliction of duty.
From Flags:
Paul, you may want to ask her, how is a claim (Phil's) of your actual birthrights from the Creator not superior to a fiction of law American?
From Anna:
Apples and oranges again, or more like apples and kumquats. The Kingdom of Heaven has nothing to do with "the" Kingdom of God. Same basic confusion. Same logic default. Maybe if you get one "Aha!" moment, you will be able to see it all, but until then, you just make assumptions and more assumptions, and in the process try to put words in my mouth.
I have been in the front lines with Kurt Kallenbach, revealing that the Divine Origin of each of us has been "papered over" by the "birth day" (recorded entrance time) and then again by the "birth date" (registered exit time). The situation is like being marooned at sea and claiming to be, instead, out in the middle of Kansas.
Our actual point of incarnation occurs by an Act of God resulting in fertilization of an egg and formation of a unique zygote from which all else follows. That's the truth and that's where our Divine Birthright originates from, along with our Natural and Unalienable Rights. But Phil made no reference to any of that. He stayed firmly out to sea. So who is "delusional"?
From Flags:
She claims State national is highest yet now claims American? Where are the docs allowing all capacities, characters, conditions, status and standings utilized and effectuated today by the alleged government? Why doesn't she post proof of her definitions. It seems she is always saying in a round about way this is the way it is and so what.
From Anna:
That's because even though I gave you explicit directions and proof of exactly where these different kinds of political status are defined --- and repeat myself --- you still try to pretend that I haven't answered you when I have answered you---and far more than one time.
Here it is again:
American State National defined at: 8 USC 1101 (a) 21.
American State Citizen defined at: 8 USC 1101 (a) 22 (B).
United States Citizen and Municipal citizen of the United States defined in any of the three (3) Constitutions at: Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3 and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2.
And as for me saying, "So what?" --- it's because you are bringing forward non-issues as if they were issues, or as if they were cause for surprise or discussion. Why wouldn't the King be Arch-Treasurer of a British Territorial corporation doing business as "the" United States of America?
That doesn't make him Arch-Treasurer of the American Federation of States doing business as The United States of America----which is what you are trying to claim.
From Flags:
I am sure during our next meeting which is to be held again at the Charlottesville Winery I could really impress the Flag Officers and Eric if I could produce J Pegs from Anna of the 3 Constitutions she speaks of. But she won't and you know why.
From Anna:
And why would I have to provide you with anything that you can easily go out and obtain for yourself and which you have a duty to obtain---- and follow ---- if you call yourself a "Flag Officer" ?
Go to the Congressional Library ---like we all did--- to satisfy yourself that I am not just making this up, because with your disgusting attitude, I could give you mint condition copies of the original documents delivered on a silver platter, and you would say I faked them.
Remember these are the names and dates of the Constitutions:
1. The Constitution for the united States of America (1787)
2. The Constitution of the United States of America (1789)
3. The Constitution of the United States (1790)
And don't try to pretend (again) that your lack of Due Diligence is my fault or responsibility.
From Flags:
At this point the Flag asked me to tell Anna they would like to speak with the continental marshals she claims to be working with and what is their contact info? I told them that's the BS she makes up to keep her ignorant lemming followers continuing to follow her music of baiting hope never to deliver anything.. Yes, that request was made in jest as they have read much of the incoherent statements and claims on her website.
From Anna:
I suggest that they speak directly with Senior Chief Marshal Tresa Haywood. I will give Paul the contact information to pass on to you. She is nice and polite, but, she has her ducks in order ---and isn't likely to take any guff or put up with any insulting presumptions. Read that: incoming stovepipe.
From Flags:
I and those around me follow the law and most of them are old and some very old and hidden from most. Arbitration in its common law form developed in England; in the Middle Ages, in tribunals such as the Courts of the Boroughs. Courts became suspicious of arbitration; for example, in Kill v. Hollister (1746), an English court ruled that the arbitration agreement could 'oust' courts of law and equity of jurisdiction. Arbitration was common in the early United States, with George Washington serving as an arbiter on an occasion. And the Arbitration process has been used ever since. However, its been used mostly by the selfserving impostors.
From Anna:
"Arbitration" is Law-by-Contract, and it doesn't work unless there is an Arbitration Clause built into the contract to begin with.
Trying to enforce a one-sided arbitration results in attempted unilateral contracting process, which is why none of these numerous "successful" arbitration actions work.
Both the people bringing the issue and the people issuing the judgment didn't check: (1) the status and standing of the Claimant relative to the Claim; (2) the existence of an Arbitration Clause in the contract; (3) the proper jurisdiction of the Law being addressed, which must match the jurisdiction which the Claimant is claiming.
Phil loses on all three counts.
As I keep trying to tell you, as far as law is concerned, there are no living men in the international jurisdiction of the sea, nor in the global jurisdiction of the air ---either one.
So Phil has an unenforceable arbitration award and you are trying to make yourselves out to be Great Sages.
For the record:
Arbitration only works and exists in the realm of contract law.
So here is Phil Hudok, claiming to be a living man owed all his rights, using a process of contract law that only applies to corporations and officers of corporations, that is, to Persons, and trying to apply it to a contract that has no arbitration clause applicable to him. Brilliant. Simply brilliant.
Why don't you all stop embarrassing yourselves? It only gets worse from here on.


See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Spirit of the True God Moves Us

By Anna Von Reitz

The Spirit of the True God moves us and gives us enlightenment; the Holy Spirit is called The Counselor, and The Comforter, because the Holy Spirit was sent here to do both things pending the final resurrection and construction of Heaven on Earth.  

Our Father, also a Spirit, gives us life and health and the fullness of our being, our consciousness, and our bodily incarnation --- but his Spirit also gives us insight and answers and solace.  

We make a huge mistake when we rely on our own resources and take counsel with our own thoughts---- because we have open access to so much more, and so much assistance is ours, if we simply ask for it and accept help.  

How do you all think I have come to know all the things that I have revealed to you?  I have not come to this knowledge by myself.  

I have asked for help and I have been given help, and it is the same for everyone else.  If I am "special" in any way, it is only that I had the humility and horse sense to ask and knock and recognize the hand of God extended to me, enlightening my mind and lightening my load and giving me the answers. 

The relationship is very much like that of any other parent and a child.  

So long as your child is happy and progressing on their own, even if they fall down from time to time, you let them continue to exercise their free will and learn on their own.   But when your child comes to you with a problem they can't solve, you pause and help them. 

It is the same with the Holy Spirit.  He will pause and help you with whatever you need, if you ask for help.  

Once you ask, you need to relax and let the answers come.  There is usually a time delay of between three and thirty days, but the answers will come. 

Now as to all those gossips who say, "Why was she talking to and working for the Pope (Benedict XVI)?"  --- I have this to say: 

(1)  I was shown by the Holy Spirit that the Pope was in control of it all, both the British Territorial Government and the Municipal Government, so I took the problem to him under the Spirit's guidance; 

(2) Pope Benedict XVI responded and tried to help despite great danger and personal cost to himself; I have no doubt that he truly wasn't told what was going on, and I have proof that he took immediate good faith action to correct --- including sending me and many others to give Notice to his employees worldwide, telling them to correct their operations; 

(3) Pope Francis has been a different story.  He focuses on circling the wagons and reorganizing the church and indulges in efforts to keep the venal machinery of the Roman Pontificate intact, howbeit, operating through a new storefront -- that of the United Nations organization, instead of the Roman Catholic Church.  That is to say, he is moving to relocate the problem and expand upon it. 

So what I have spoken to you about all these things does not come from my limited awareness, but from my Counselor and Teacher, the Holy Spirit.  If any of you have any question about the truth of what I have said or are struggling to verify it, ask him.  You will be shown and guided. 

If anyone has any further question about why it is necessary to address the Pope in order to bring peace to this country and to the world --- consider that both the corporations engaged in this "war" on our soil are owned and controlled by the Pope.  

One is controlled by the Pope indirectly, as the Queen serves him to administer the Commonwealth aka British Territorial Government, and the other is more obviously and directly connected via the Municipal Government.  

He controls both the "teams" of pirates that have been attacking us under color of law. 

And he will still control both teams of pirates and they will still continue to attack us, even if the Queen is no longer involved and even if the Roman Catholic Church is "officially" removed from the field and replaced by the United Nations. 

It would still be a farce in which the United Nations controlled by the Pope does battle with his own Municipal Government, and we, the miserable civilian population would still be misidentified and caught in the middle.  

So the problem is the Pope, and so is the solution with the Pope.  

We must contend with the Evil in High Places --- the secretive and venal competing religion of Babylon.  We must contend with the Spirit of Falsehood. 
We must expose this Evil at every turn.  

We must deal with the entire misguided "Church Militant" that believes in killing "for" Jesus.   We must deal with the oxymoron posed by the "Secular Church".  

And this must be done from inside the Roman Catholic Church and from outside the Roman Catholic Church.  

Just as we have been played "both ends against the middle" for a century and a half by two foreign governmental services corporations, both ultimately working for the Pope, the Church must be --- not attacked --- but cleansed as with good soap and hot water, from within and without. 

The Roman Catholic Church must not allowed to carry on as it has been, promoting war, betraying trust, avoiding its treaty obligations via constructive fraud, and generally causing trouble as it pursues a Secret Agenda of world conquest veiled even from its own members.  

This despicable and duplicitous behavior on the part of the Roman Catholic Church has to be recognized for what it is, and the Church must be "called on the carpet" by the entire world, most especially by its membership, its laymen, its organizations, and its clergy. 

Let us suggest that there are a lot hotter topics for the Curia to discuss and for the clergy to address, than returning to a policy of allowing married priests. 

How about giving up the Doctrine of Scarcity and the Doctrine of Collective Entities?   Throwing it out, just as you have thrown out the Doctrine of Discovery?  They are all bunk.  They all cause misery.   

How about ending the "Church Militant" and all the nastiness that goes on because of that?  When is the last time that the Church was in mortal danger, as opposed to causing mortal danger for others?  

How about voluntarily ending the whole farcical pretense of fronting "wars" between the church's own business interests, and using this as an excuse for attacking bystanders?  

How about calling a halt to attempts to use any good organization, including the actual Church or the United Nations, as a storefront to conduct operations that are by their very nature and existence ---- evil? 

These are the Hot Topics that the top clergy of the Roman Catholic Church needs to be discussing, because believe me, the rest of the world is watching, and so is The Kingdom of Heaven.   


See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Why Peace Treaty 2020 Won't Work

By Anna Von Reitz

Don't get me wrong. It's a fine idea.....but.....
For a Treaty to be valid you need to have certain things straight, and as with everything else these guys are doing or attempting to do, they don't have the verbiage straight. They are still confused by the similar names deceit, and as a result, they keep making the same mistakes.
As I observed about Phil Hudok. He didn't reclaim his rightful birthright as an American by his actions. He reclaimed his birthright as a British Territorial United States Citizen ---- as if he had been born in Guam.
And that's why the King's Courts are so willing to give him succor and relief as a poor Pauper of the Commonwealth coming before the King's Bench for relief --- as in "welfare relief".
The same kinds of mistakes are self-evident in the Peace Treaty 2020 document, so that's a non-starter from the beginning.
So that is one insurmountable issue.
Another is that in order for a peace treaty to work and be valid, you have to have the correct parties signing it---- and for the moment, that is as impossible now as it was 150 years ago.
The American Civil War was a Mercenary Conflict fought on our soil by two opposing sets of Federal Service Providers. The Big Dogs in the fight were the members of the Confederation formed by The Articles of Confederation in 1781, what we call "the North and South" or, "the Union and the Confederacy".
In fact, both the North and South were members of the original Confederacy, so it is more proper to think in terms of the Northern Confederation vs. the Southern Confederation.
It's also necessary to know that these "Confederate States" were not "States" in the sense that we typically think of the word, and also, were not our States of the Union.
They were the original American States of States operating as businesses to provide our States and People with services at the federal level.
So you have actual States that are members of our Federation of States, and you have States of States that are supposed to function as members of the Confederation. Apples and oranges. Actual States and States of States.
It was the original States of States business organizations that fought the Civil War.
So, The State of New York went to war with The State of South Carolina, for example, and these were the entities that conducted the entire war.
You can easily prove this by looking at the war rosters of men being inducted into the service on both sides of the conflict. They were mustered out as companies representing "The State of ___________".
These powerful business interests were the primary combatants, but both the Territorial and Municipal United States "Federal Service Providers" also got involved.
The Territorial United States entity dba "the" United States of America sided with the North. The Municipal United States entity dba "the" United States sided with the South.
Thus, to have a valid Peace Treaty ending the conflict, the parties to it would have to be fighting an actual declared war -- which they weren't, and all the parties would have to sign it, which is impossible because the Confederate States --- both North and South --- ceased functioning.
The Northern Confederacy was bankrupted in 1863, and the Southern Confederacy was "ruined" and rendered unable to function by the Grand Army of the Republic, and neither one was ever reconstructed.
So, the Big Dogs in the fight are no longer present and in a condition to sign a Peace Treaty, even if a Peace Treaty were the appropriate instrument to end a Mercenary Conflict ---- which it is not. [What you are looking for, is a "Peace Accord" similar to what they did in Vietnam.]
Their respective allies, the British Territorial United States dba "the" United States of America and the Municipal United States dba "the" United States are still present, but they've turned all this into a big joke and used it as an excuse to continue a totally bogus "war" on our shores ever since.
Pending the Reconstruction, of course.
The reason that I call the continuing mercenary war between the British United States and the Municipal United States "bogus" is that they are both working for the Pope and always have been.
The Territorial Government works for him indirectly, and the Municipal Government works for him directly, so the whole thing is a spoof played from both ends against the middle.
The Queen manages the British Commonwealth for the Pope, so she is the Pope's employee in this matter, and the Municipal Government works directly for the Pope, so you are treated to the spectacle of two Roman Catholic business entities "fighting" each other for profit.
And an entire civilian population owed their "Good Faith and Service" being pillaged and plundered by their own employees using these specious excuses.
So what you are actually looking for is called a "Peace Accord" and in order to get it, you have to reconstruct the American States of States, both North and South.
All right, well, the Government of the People, by the People, and for the People is a living government composed of Lawful Persons defined as State Citizens ---- living Americans who accept their Public Duty and populate the actual States of the Union by serving the State Government in various capacities ----Jurors, Deputies, Justices, and so on.
Our first obstacle is that thanks to continuing Gross Breach of Trust on the part of the Popes and British Monarchs, we have all been deliberately misidentified and mis-characterized as either Territorial United States Citizens or Municipal "citizens of the United States".
According to them, this entire country is populated by Federal Employees. And if you believe that, I have some Florida real estate to sell....
This results in a situation wherein we have to go back and deliberately, knowingly correct our political status records.
After we go through all that Turkey Trot and notify the United States Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, we can function as State Citizens, can organize our actual States, and can then "reconstruct" the American States of States, both North and South.
But even though we must do our best to accomplish this whole task of assembling our States and reconstructing our States of States (which we are doing) that is still no guarantee of peace.
Why? Because the Pope, that Diva of Peace and Love [purportedly], continues to make commercial war against us under these deplorably and inexcusably False Pretenses. His employee in this matter, Elizabeth II, continues on with the charade.
His other employee in this matter, the Secretary General of the United Nations, is playing his part to a "t" and cannot be trusted to act as our Trustee ---- a set up engineered by Jimmy Carter's Administration --- because he, Antonio Guterres, is a lifelong subject of the Pope.
I almost burst out laughing when I heard Pope Francis sanctimoniously saying that we must obey the United Nations --- that is, obey his employee, Antonio Guterres.
It's the same game, folks. Whether it is the British Queen indirectly doing the Pope's bidding, or the Secretary General of the United Nations indirectly doing the Pope's bidding.
It all comes down to the gross malfunctioning of the Roman Curia and the Roman Catholic Church and the Office of the Pope.
If you want peace in this world, you have found the epicenter of perpetual war --- the so-called "Church Militant"--- and you now have a firmer grasp on what you are really dealing with.
May all the Roman Catholics reading this wake up and realize just how despicable and two-faced the behavior of the "Church" has been on this and on many, many other occasions ---- and take action accordingly.
May all the world leaders reading this wake up and deal with the situation at the United Nations, which is being primed as the new "store front" for these hypocrites.
May all the Americans reading this wake up and reclaim their political status as Americans; all of us who are not in the military nor in the Federal Civil Service at this time, are free to repudiate all claims that we are any species of Federal Citizen at all.
Unless you all want to live under the thumb of the Inquisition and under the control of a dirty theocracy run by hypocrites, it's time to convince the Pope that the whole carefully planned set up is blown.
And as for Mr. Trump? He can do what Andrew Johnson did, and create a binding commercial contract on the rats by three times Declaring the Peace in Public.
It will take a concerted effort on all our parts to ride herd on the members of Congress to make sure that such a Peace is honored, but it can be done internally, and Mr. Guterres will be obligated to obey our internal Peace Accord.
If they welch on it, every country in the world will know who to bomb and who to avoid as business partners and allies.
The Brits appear to be waking up after a very long slumber and so do the erstwhile members of the Commonwealth.
We have 27 of our States of the Union assembled and populated --- a majority position capable of conducting business for The United States of America. And more Americans are waking up to the clear and present danger every day.
If you want peace, not only in our country, but throughout the world --- get off your duffs, and start chewing on the elephant in the center of the dining room.


See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.