International Public Notice: The Actual Anatomy of Peace

 By Anna Von Reitz

Most people living in this world are blissfully unaware that the majority of countries involved in World War II were already being "represented" by foreign incorporated Governmental Services Corporations, such as "the United States of America, Inc." and "the United States, Inc." and "the United Kingdom, Inc." at that time. 

They are even more blissfully unaware that the preponderance of these incorporated entities all went bankrupt en masse between 1950 and 1953, as they sought to shed themselves of the unbearable debt of World War II and its aftermath --- and offload that debt onto the shoulders of their helpless citizenry, the actual victims of WWII, instead. 

It was in this stymied period of recollection immediately after the end of the WWII hostilities that the two "Bibles" of the World Governance Movement appeared --- E.B. Whites' The Wild Flag (1946), and Emery Reves' The Anatomy of Peace (1945) --- and began to be debated. 

White's rambling dissertations are entertaining and provoke some worthy thinking but fall far short of providing any comprehensive framework for world government; Reves serves up more meat on the subject and some reasoned argument, but again, provides no "how to" solution and the reasoning is limited in scope to those points that Reves could easily address.  All the harder topics are avoided.   

Reves blames all human strife on the competition of national economies and the existence of national sovereignty. Reves's analysis handily combines with Communist theories of the Haves and Have Nots being in eternal war until everyone is busted down to a single economic equality as a common denominator, with arguments in favor of a world-spanning system of Law to keep us all in order. 

Reves ignores the proven inability of mankind to follow written law, already established by our failure to uphold The Ten Commandments -- much less 80 million statutory infringements already on the books.  

We couldn't even follow the two Great Laws succinctly enumerated by Yeshuah. 

So any hope that anyone has placed in manmade legislation is patently ridiculous and we might as well end any discussion of World Governance established under any Universal Legislature with a loud guffaw right now, before we even get into the wrangle of how many votes each country would get and why and so on.  

Law, self-evidently, is not the answer to our question. 

And neither is some weary one-size-fits-all economic standard, as the former Soviet Union proved.  

None of this academic clap-trap makes the basic and necessary effort to keep human nature firmly in view, nor any effort to observe our collective past experience.  

Law doesn't work. 

Enforced economic equality doesn't work.  

So here we are with Mr. Reves and two answers that we already know don't work, no better off, and no further on in the search for world peace. 

Even worse, in his Brave New World of the Ultimate Big Brother, which is supposed to be established in the name of preventing more war and conflict, a world in which stripping national sovereignty is supposed to magically end all our differences -- Mr. Reves doesn't explain how he would prevent civil war and keep it from erupting between the various bureaucracies of the world government itself. 

We are thinking about the current struggle between DOD (Municipal) and the Department of Defense (Territorial) and all the poor sods caught in the middle, and we are shaking our heads. 

We are funding both sides of this "war" and both sides are using us for target practice.  

So even units of government having the same function and purportedly the same goal and both working for the same people, regularly kill each other and everyone else in between for no apparent reason.  

"Government" doesn't work, either. 

In all the discussions that circulate each night at cocktail parties and schmooze sessions and all of what passes for erudite academic wisdom, there is a stubborn and cloying element of banal stupidity.  

Law doesn't work. 

Enforced equality doesn't work. 

Government doesn't work. 

And we all have cause to know this, no matter who you are or where you live on this planet. 

So let's leave law, ideas about "equality" -- economic or otherwise -- and government out of the discussion about how to achieve world peace, and discuss other avenues that have a chance to bear fruit. 

How about making war unprofitable? 

For example, if all the peace-loving nations combine, we can make sure that Netanyahu doesn't make a dime from his incursions into Gaza, Lebanon and Syria.  

We can back-charge "the State of Israel, Inc." and its Principals for the cost of rebuilding everything that the Infant Terrible destroyed, plus damages.  

And thereby deprive the Aggressors of their "territorial" profit motives. 

It doesn't take another war to end their war.  It requires a simple boycott and trade embargo, commercial claims, and international enforcement. 

Observe what happened when Walmart was caught aiding and abetting rioters in Los Angeles?  The biggest boycott in the history of commerce descended like a nearly frozen wet blanket.  Within hours, Walmart policy was back to supporting law and order.  Instead of selling rocks to rioters, they were giving away free energy drinks to ICE officers. 

You can similarly set your watch concerning change in the Israeli ruling junta, the moment that Israel faces serious economic and social losses as a result of its behavior.  

Contracts cancelled.  Supplies interrupted.  Bank accounts shut down.  Boycotts on Israeli goods.  Stiff tariffs. Travel restrictions. Damage claims filed. 

You want to see world peace?  This is the language that the Perpetrators speak.  It's the only language they understand. 

Want to preserve the lives of millions of people?  

Set an arbitrary worldwide value of $5 Trillion silver dollars on their heads. 

The loss of 20,000 innocent children in Gaza would cost enough to bankrupt Israel, Inc., and their Principals.  The loss of two-thirds of the world population at just $1T in gold, each, will bankrupt every corporation on Earth, not just the U.S. Congress, Inc. and Big Pharma. 

Suddenly, it's not possible to make a buck killing people, and instead, they face huge losses.  

So, peace breaks out.  Children are suddenly viewed as precious, because they literally are. Meddling in our health and other private affairs stops, because nobody wants a part of that liability.  

We put war and war-mongers in the rearview mirror, where they belong.   

They no longer have a profit motive to kill anyone.  They have a profit motive to preserve life instead. And they have a potent motive to leave us alone, and to cause us no harm from now on.  

For this reason, we are repeating our claim that The United States of America, our unincorporated Federation of States, is owed one Trillion dollars in gold for every American killed or maimed as a result of receiving a Covid 19 "vaccine" under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure. 

Our people are our most precious resource, and at last report, over 240,000 Americans had admittedly lost their lives as a result of Covid 19 operations undertaken by the Municipal DOD and False Advertising provided by other Municipal affiliates, BBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, etc., to the effect that these injections were "safe and effective". 

It appears that they were safe for those giving the injections and effective in killing innocent people, including pregnant women, babies, young children, and teenagers, as well as large numbers of the elderly and most vulnerable members of our population.  

The Perpetrators of these crimes are denied any recourse to public bankruptcy as a result of their willful criminality and no benefit of the corporate veil may be extended to them.   

We get rid of the: (1) profit motives; (2) the means of action -- that is, the guilty corporate organizations; and (3) the men responsible for misdirecting these corporations to commit these crimes against humanity. 

Imagine the scene.  It's wintertime and all is peaceful.  The snow falls and it isn't polluted anymore.  People don't have to worry about "their" news sources lying to them anymore.  There are no pandemics, no directed energy weapon attacks, no phony public trusts named after any of us, no forced immigration.

Our banks are simple affairs that use carriage accounting. They don't securitize living flesh.  They don't manipulate commodities.  They don't claim to own deposits.  They don't block transfers. 

Our traditional and customary national governments are back and any governmental services corporations are serving according to their Constitutional Obligations. 

The Great Fraud is over at last. 

The predatory corporations are gone as if they never were. 

So are the "National Debts". 

People no longer live in fear of their own public employees.  

They live in security and abundance instead. 

Without any profit to be made from killing and maiming and causing people to be ill, and horrendously stiff commercial penalties in place for any such activity, the corporations that are left operate lawfully and make their profits honestly.   

As intended. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

June 12th 2025

------------------

See this article and over 5400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: To Illegal Immigrants and Hired Rioters

 By Anna Von Reitz

First, a ray of hope to those "illegals" who have been in this country more than seven years, the actual American Government considers that if you have managed to live in this country peacefully --- meaning no felony convictions --- and without receiving public assistance for a period of seven years, you are eligible to claim a State of the Union as your permanent home and be considered "naturalized" without going through the process of becoming some species of United States citizen and going through their naturalization process.  

As such, anyone who has lived in this country and can prove this via holding an address, telephone bills, pay stubs, etc., for seven years, and not having a criminal record and not taking public assistance during that time, can fully and immediately complete immigration to the State where you live and declare it is your permanent house, home, and domicile.  

You can then join the State Assembly affirming these facts and receive your State National Credentials, which we are prepared to enforce.  

That said, there is no intention or desire to remove honest hard-working people who have come to this country in good faith and established their homes here.  There is an intention to remove recent waves of immigrants for reasons that you may not know. 

The Drug Cartels sent thousands of "troops" into this country to not only push drugs, but to mount armed resistance if their routes and pay days are interrupted.  Their presence is a danger to the peace that we all depend on for our safety and they cannot be allowed to stay here.  We have already seen their activities in destruction of food processing and oil refinery facilities, arsonist fires like the Palisades fire in California, and other criminal activity. 

Thousands more of the recent immigrants are literally released murderers, armed robbers, rapists, and other violent criminals who have literally been released from jail in South America and imported here. They have to go back, too, and for the same reasons. 

These and similar smaller groups that have the same history of violent crime or attachment to criminal syndicates are the focus of the ICE efforts to locate and deport.  

If you read President Trump's Executive Orders regarding all of this activity, you will see that this is so and is reflected in the orders and directions that the public employees have been given. 

That said, you can see that rioting in favor of criminals doesn't play well, and those of you who are being paid to riot should seriously consider that the gloves are off and you have been given fair warning. 

You have to ask yourself -- is the paycheck worth it?  Really?  

There's another reason that nobody should be standing against the ICE Agents that, surprisingly, has to do with the immigrants and their own welfare.  

Many of them left their home countries --- not really because they wanted to leave, but because they had limited opportunities.  They came here in search of a better life.  Soon those countries they left behind will be engaged in all sorts of active development and restoration work and be desperate for their help.  Their families back home will be calling out to them, and there will be no reason to stay here.  

Another reason is that they are just being used by the Democrat Liars as an "improved chattel asset" --- when someone from Mexico or Honduras or Guatemala steps across the border, their "value" as a corporation franchise skyrockets, from around $100,000 to billions with a "B".  This doesn't help the individual, but it allows this crooked "US Government" to access more credit and helps finance all the illegal wars-for-profit these corporations are engaged in. 

Do you want to help fund the murder of 20,000 helpless children in Gaza?  How about the takeover of Ukraine and the murder of millions of Ukrainians and Russians, who aren't that much different from you?  

Didn't think so. 

So, go home.  Turn yourself in and they will put you on an airplane and you will be home in time for supper. No questions asked. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

June 12th 2025

------------------

See this article and over 5400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Federation or Confederation?

 By Anna Von Reitz

In the Lexicon of Law, there are numerous examples of contextual identity.  

For example, when our Federal Employees refer to the Federal Constitutions as "the Law of the Land", they are (silently) making a distinction between "the Law of the Land" and "the Law of the Sea".  

The Constitutions are supposed to be followed and obeyed when these Employees are on land, in the same way that sailors are supposed to follow the local law and not bust up waterfront bars for the fun of it when they are released in port for "liberty".  

Their liberty does not amount to freedom, however, because even when they are released from ship's discipline, they are still required to observe the International Law of the Land governing the countries they visit. 

This is an example of contextual identity.  Which law applies depends on where you are -- on land or sea.  From the context of a sailor stepping off the dock, he is entering upon the land and the Law of the Land now applies.  From the context of a tourist getting on a ship in New York bound for Norway, he is entering upon the sea and for the duration of the trip, he is bound by the Law of the Sea. 

The same sort of contextual identity applies to Federations and Confederations.  

The prefix "con" applied to "federation" implies the gathering together, or con-solidation of the federation under discussion, or the opposite of a federation.  

Our Federation of the States of the Union generally operates in international jurisdiction as a gathering of independent State members, equally endowed to vote on issues impacting them as a group.  It also acts as a Holding Company for the Mutually Held Powers of the States and in that capacity, the Federation puts on a different hat and acts as a Confederation -- the result of gathering separate powers together and consolidating them.  

Whether you are acting as a Federation or a Confederation doesn't necessarily imply a change of members, but it does imply a change in how the members operate as a group -- in this case, as separate independent and equal States (Federation), or as States acting together for their mutual self-interest (Confederation). 

This is a contextual identity depending on whether you are exercising separate powers or mutually held powers as a group.  

The Federation of States operating in International venues as The United States of America was created in 1776, but it took several months before the Mutual Powers were agreed upon and the Confederation also operating as The United States of America wasn't founded until 1777 as a result.

The arguments about setting up a similar set of Federation/Confederation functions for the States of America operating in global venues took another four years and the contract binding the Mutual Powers in that venue wasn't ratified until 1781.

The United States of America pairing of Federation and Confederation occupies the international jurisdictions of land and sea, both, and so represents a double set of such "bookends".  

The States of America pairing of Federation and Confederation functions occupying the global jurisdiction of the air lasted from 1781 to 1861. 

The members of this air jurisdiction Federation are States-of-States organizations  and when they consolidate mutually held powers, they operate as the Confederation we always think of, the States of America founded in 1781. 

So Federations and Confederations, at least in this country, traditionally come in pairs, and we naturally present three pairs, one each for the Land, the Air, and the Water.    

The United States of America -- a Federation of independent States operating in International Jurisdiction, becomes a Confederation wielding Mutually Shared Powers. 

The States of America -- a Federation of independent States-of-States operating in Global Jurisdiction, becomes a Confederation when wielding pre-agreed upon Mutually Shared Powers.  

Thus,  a Federation would take a Roll Call Vote of independent members, while a Confederation would act on behalf of all members with regard to their Mutually Shared Powers, based on pre-existing contracts. 

Whether you call it a Federation or a Confederation at any given time thus depends on whether the members are acting separately and independently or pulling together and exercising their Mutually Shared Powers. 

It's a contextual identity.  Just like contemplating the Law of the Land from the perspective of a sailor is different from a landsman's view of the same thing, whether your organization is acting as a Federation or a Confederation is a matter of its member functions -- whether they act separately or act together by pre-established agreement.  

Another way to remember this is that a Con-federation acts upon pre-established con-tracts.  

The truly picky part is making sure which "Confederation" you are referencing, because the Confederation powers of The United States of America have never changed, and those of the States of America no longer exist. 

Another problem is a confusion that arose and which is described pretty accurately by this quote from Wiki: 

"A contrast between federation and confederation—words synonymous in their origin—has been developed in the political terminology of the United States. 

Until 1789 the [British Territorial] U.S. was a confederation, but, with the adoption of the U.S. Constitution, the word federation, or the phrase federal republic, was introduced to imply a closer union. 

[This is actually incorrect -- the British Territorial U.S. Constitution of 1789 was not impacted.  It was the Federal Constitution of 1787 that was impacted and which provided the service contract for the Federal Republic.] 

This distinction was emphasized during the American Civil War, when the seceding states formed a confederation (the Confederate States of America) in opposition to the Federal Union. 

[Again, this is incorrect.  The Confederate States of America was a very honest name and revealed the exact nature of the Parties.  "The Northern Confederate States" would have been a far more honest name for the Northern participants which had nothing to do with the Federal Republic or any presumed-to-exist Federal Union.]

Confederation thus came to mean a union of sovereign states in which the emphasis is laid on the autonomy of each constituent body, whereas federation implies a union of states in which the supremacy of the common government is recognized. The distinction, however, is by no means universally observed."

[ Again, incorrect, three for three.  No "sovereign states" were involved in the so-called American Civil War, and "federation" as we have seen, implies exactly the opposite -- states operating in their independent and separate capacities.] 

The "Confederation" that was torn apart in March of 1861 was the air jurisdiction confederation formed by the respective States-of-States organizations both North and South. 

The violation of contract at issue was the claim that this Confederation was a "perpetual union" that could not be broken by any of the members.  They could not "secede" --- not because that was outside their rights as instrumentalities of sovereign nation-states, but because they had contractually agreed to remain in perpetual union.  And didn't. 

Years later, Jefferson Davis, former President of The Confederate States of America, and one of the greatest lawyers of his time, commented that a "perpetual union" is "beyond the ability of any institution of mortal man to bind, and therefore void by nature."

This principle, that we cannot apply contracts to issues beyond our ability to guarantee, was already hoary with antiquity long before our country took form, and prohibitions against "contracts in perpetuity" were also well-established.  

It is not plausible that the men signing The Articles of Confederation (the con-tract) were unaware of this, and yet, they signed it anyway. 

A set up?  A mistake?  Jefferson Davis maintained it was an invalid contract by definition, null and void from the outset -- and that both States and States-of-States by their Nature and limitations are forever free to secede from such inherently flawed agreements. 

Jefferson Davis looked forward to the day when Americans would look back and realize what the fight was all about and why it was important for each State to maintain control of its economic destiny as a fundamental issue of freedom and self-determination. 

Perhaps that day has come. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

June 12th 2025

------------------

See this article and over 5400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Our Donor Position is Exercised

 By Anna Von Reitz

A fine point  for your consideration --- we have all been thrust into the position of Donor-Beneficiaries by these Miscreants; so we act as Donors and NOT as Beneficiaries in reclaiming our assets and purloined credit.  The Trustees (World Bank, UN, etc. ) have acted as Executors de Son Tort, without our knowledge or approval, and if we applied to them as "beneficiaries" they would simply shrug and do whatever they like according to "their discretion" and not to ours; however, when our position of  Donors as well as Beneficiaries comes into play, they have no choice in the matter.  The Trustees have to obey the Donors in all things, and guess what, when you peel the layers of their onion, we--- the living people--- are the only Donors.   

Not only that, their "excuse" that we applied for "benefits", etc., is specious, as we are our own Benefactors in the scheme they created.  

It's a double-handed play they have set up.  First, they got our Mother's to unknowingly waive our American estates under conditions of non-disclosure--- that created the "infant decedent estate" and allowed members of the Bar to take over Administering the resulting public trust.  

As the Mothers were hoodwinked and acted without disclosure, they were in no position to tell the babies anything about this change in political status and jurisdiction later on.  At the age of 18, the grown up baby would in theory be able to reclaim their "waived" American estate, but as the baby was too young to know at the time they were cheated, and the parents were also unaware due to non-disclosure, the British Territorial citizenship(s) foisted off on them either as U.S. Citizens (military) or United States Citizens (civilian -- a citizenship status from the purloined Federal Republic) were contractual obligations that the parents and the victims were both unaware of.  These unconscionable contracts are still being invoked and misapplied without further substantiation in the face of our objections. 

The baby American, e.g. John Wayne Albertson, with his estate waived and snatched while he is still in his cradle, is next issued a clearinghouse certificate disguised as a "Certificate of Live Birth" and trafficked into the British Territorial jurisdictions both Maritime and Admiralty.  

The Brits then create two British Territorial "Citizens" and traffic the "surrendered" American into their jurisdiction(s) --- Maritime and Admiralty, as salvaged assets and collateral. The first British Territorial entity is a Warrant  Officer in the British Merchant Marine Service, specifically, a "Tax Payer", who goes AWOL and is listed as "lost at sea, presumed dead" --- e.g.,  Albertson, John Wayne.   So there is your second presumed "dead" and/or waived estate, this one belonging to a trafficked American acting as a "lost" British Merchant Mariner. This phony identity creates a British Seaman's Trust Estate under Admiralty Law.  Then there is the civilian entity, also based on the trafficked American identity --- only this one is a "United States Citizen" presumed to be working in some Federally regulated activity --- interstate manufacture, sale, or transportation of alcohol, tobacco, or firearms (defined as heavy armament, cannons, howitzers, etc.) --- another "dummy corporation" set up in the victim's name, purportedly employed in a regulated capacity--- as John Wayne Albertson, which just happens to be the exact same name as the American baby --- same name, same style, cannot be distinguished from the American original.  This is how we wind up with a British Territorial named the same name as Americans, getting into all sorts of offshore mischief --- like me, according to the IRS Masterfile, I have been working as a mid-manager of a rum distillery in Barbados and my husband has been running guns like Ollie North in South America, all without stepping foot outside of Alaska. And this is how the cretins have contrived to use the enforcement powers of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms to attack clueless American Mothers and children huddled in a church basement in Waco, Texas, with tanks and flame throwers that these same victims paid for and which were supposed to be used to defend them and their country.  

Next, the Villains issue another clearinghouse certificate disguised as a BIRTH CERTIFICATE and traffic the hapless British Merchantman's Estate  into the jurisdiction of the air, where it is mirrored as a Municipal Cestui Que Vie ESTATE and that is created out of thin air and bonded.  JOHN WAYNE ALBERTSON is set up by the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE of the MUNICIPALITY OF WASHINGTON, DC., under Municipal Code.... and now we are off to the races again. 

The "missing, presumed lost" British Seaman's Trust Estate which has been trafficked into the air jurisdiction, is mirrored as a Municipal Cestui Que Vie ESTATE Trust.  

So you have the purportedly "waived" American Estate of John Wayne Albertson, an American baby. 

You have the British Seaman's Estate of "presumed dead" Taxpayer, Albertson, John Wayne

You have the British Territorial latched upon United States Citizen engaged in regulated interstate commerce, John Wayne Albertson

You have the mirrored Municipal United States Cestui Que Vie Trust operated as JOHN WAYNE ALBERTSON

And from there, the wonderful world of derivative trusts and corporations opens up and the sky is the limit.  

We have JOHN W ALBERTSON, a bankrupt franchise corporation of a Puerto Rican Public Transmitting Utility and we have JOHN W. ALBERTSON a "Special Purpose Vehicle" run by the DOT....and, and.

By this process of secretively "enfranchising" our names and impersonating us in different jurisdictions of the law, they have proliferated all sorts of dummy corporations that they control from "offshore" jurisdictions and bring into corporate tribunals disguised as "District Courts".  So it appears that they are summoning the clueless American, who dutifully appears, and they charge this "other" version of John Wayne Albertson or JOHN W ALBERTSON or whatever to hell else they are making up and using as a poppet today --- and use these phony private corporation courts to racketeer against the victims and subject them to totally foreign forms of law. 

And where, pray tell, have our Trustees and Employees been, as innocent people in America and throughout the former Commonwealth and in seventeen illegally occupied European countries and numerous other countries that have suffered this criminal activity from Japan to Libya, have been deprived of life, liberty, and the constitutional governments they are owed? 

Oh, they have been selling our labor and selling us as cheap mercenaries and selling our natural resources for their own benefit, in Gross Breach of Trust, Gross violation of their Service Contracts, and Gross violation of International and Global Law. And when they haven't been misrepresenting and preying upon us, they've been lying to us and making up "narratives" and making excuses for their own non-performance, and fighting with each other, and sponsoring private corporate elections as substitutes for our public elections..... and, and, and..... the members of the Government of the Philippines that was created to be a Trustee for American assets store housed in the Philippines have been busy bringing forward known False Claims in favor of Filipinos, who we hired to provide professional services for us --- like Ferdinand Marcos and others whose names are known.  People we paid really well.  Marcos was honest, for the most part, but we can't say the same for numerous Successors.  And then, there are all the employees of the "Global Federal Reserve" who got super wealthy by selling our labor and taxing us on our own labor --- which is known as peonage.  And the employees of the Municipal Trust who enslaved us to pay their corporate debts and purloined our exemptions to further benefit themselves. 

When they weren't doing that, they were lying about the existence of a war and mischaracterizing our beloved country and the entire planet as a "battlefield" and it appears that they have completely forgotten their place and role in the world.  

They have tried to redefine their Employers and Benefactors as "the Enemy", and have misrepresented their Priority Creditors as their Debtors, by refusing to balance the books in a crooked bookkeeping system they adopted to unjustly enrich themselves.  

And you think that we volunteered for all this abuse?  You think we are contractually obligated to put up with this?  You think that there is any possibility that there is a good excuse for this?  

There isn't. 

This is 100% criminal malfeasance and criminal impersonation and criminal unjust enrichment.  

When they weren't engaged in deceiving and working us to death and bringing endless False Claims in Commerce, they were busy figuring out how they could pin the blame on the victims of all this crime.  This is not about rich or poor, black or white, Muslim or Jew, American or Russian, none of that.  This is about criminals acting under color of law --- and getting away with it for a very long time.  

We are exercising our position as Donors, and only secondarily as Beneficiaries.  We are demanding a lawful and prompt end to the gross disservice we have received from men and women who owe us "good faith service".   

Notice to agents is notice to principals; notice to principals is notice to agents.  Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.  NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS; NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS.

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

June 11th 2025

------------------

See this article and over 5400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Donor-Beneficiary Status

 By Anna Von Reitz

Like lipstick on a pig, self-interested drivel is still self-interested drivel, no matter how one attempts to portray it as "philanthropy".  

Because the so-called American Civil War was a Mercenary Conflict sponsored by corporate and incorporated entities and the men who fought it were inducted as employees and volunteers ---knowingly or unknowingly acting in support of commercial organizations, there can be no doubt that this was an illegal and immoral enterprise from the start. 

We submit the induction and enrollment records of the Department of War and the individual records of the "service" members as proof, along with the following voiding facts -- facts which should be present if the  "American Civil War" was an actual war, but which are not present:

1. An actual Declaration of War from an actual sovereign government

--- and in our case that means a Declaration of War from a competent United States Congress, is not in evidence; 

2.  No actual Peace process resulting in a binding Peace Treaty ending the hostilities. 

This is proof positive and truth by averment, both conclusively demonstrating that the "American Civil War" was not a war in fact, but was instead a conflict between and funded by commercial corporations. 

The average people of this country and their sovereign government had nothing to do with any of this and even though they suffered disruption and loss for over four years as a result of it, were never told what was going on.  

They were fed a "narrative" about the "American Civil War" being a war to end slavery, which in fact, it was a war to preserve and extend both slavery and indentured peonage; and, the instant cause was a need on the part of the British Parliament to wring profit from their investments in Egyptian Cotton by destroying American Cotton crops and undermining our ability to produce cotton at competitive prices. 

It had nothing to do with slavery at all, as demonstrated shortly after the end of overt hostilities when the British Territorial U.S. Congress passed legislation abolishing slavery with one hand (13th Amendment) and re-establishing and institutionalizing it with the other (14th Amendment).  

Both these Amendments were undertaken unilaterally and never ratified by the States of the Union, underscoring the fact that these actions were undertaken by our Federal Subcontractors at their own behest and with regard to their own operations and citizenry.  

Lack of immediate protest from our Government was taken as acquiescence, and the Perpetrators have proceeded on the basis of similar "Legal Presumptions" ever since.  

The entire circumstance, from Abraham Lincoln's substitution of  "President" of "the United States of America, Incorporated" for our Office of The President of The United States of America (Unincorporated), to the passage of these unilateral contract "Amendments", has been a charade based on similar names, deceit, substitution fraud, impersonation, identity theft, and other criminal acts undertaken by Federal Subcontractors, who have always owed the victims "good faith service". 

The subsequent "conferring" of Municipal United States citizenship, on freed plantation slaves dubbing them "citizens of the United States" and creating a public ownership interest in them must be regarded as an act of heinous criminality dressed up and excused as an act of philanthropy extended to people "presumed to be stateless". 

All Americans of any color or provenance whatsoever born on our land and soil have never been stateless; they obtain their nationality from the sovereign nation-state where they are born and are not subject to any citizenship obligations. Both before and after the so-called "American Civil War", people of color were included as State Nationals of our States of the Union and were never stateless or subject to salvage as chattel. 

The creation of "14th Amendment citizenship" by fiat of the British Territorial U.S. Congress can only be interpreted as pertaining to U.S. Citizenry and U.S. Territories --- not to anyone born in one of the actual States, but it was immediately misapplied to everyone of color and millions of other Americans, including immigrants, as well. 

These  acts of unlawful conversion, latching, and denigration have been pursued for purposes on unjust enrichment by the same commercial corporations that fomented the "war" that wasn't a war, and which have continued these misrepresentations and impositions against the Public Interest, even though they have been under contract to serve "in good faith" the entire time. 

The entire beneficial interest and corpus of the various public trusts and utilities and other corporations that have been operated in our names must be returned to us unharmed.  

As the 1950-53 bankruptcy actions determined, the public is the rightful beneficiary  and also -- a point that is rarely made -- the presumed donor of all assets contributed to these public trusts; it is in our individual and collective role as "donors" that we act to require the reassignment and reconveyance of our private (individual) and public (global) assets to our control. 

We have the right as beneficiaries to expect prompt and caring service from the Trustees appointed under the 1950-53 bankruptcy treaties, but as we are forced into the dual role of being the Donors, we also hold absolute ownership rights to all assets, and no claim of obligation based on receipt of benefits can be made, as we are our own Benefactors in this situation. 

The exemptions claimed by the Municipal Corporations named after us were illegally, immorally, and unlawfully misapplied for the succor of imaginary dummy corporations that were used by the perpetrators to engage in racketeering, impersonation, and lawfare against the rightful owners and donor-beneficiaries, and also used to pursue illegal and regulated activities, such as money laundering, commodity rigging, "private" taxation, smuggling, human trafficking, drug running, smuggling of other controlled substances, and commercial crimes yet to be assessed. 

These acts of inland piracy and worse against the interests of the Donor-Beneficiaries and Employers of Record demand the dissolution of these Municipal and Commercial corporations, the associated Public Trusts, and also mandate the return of all assets unharmed to the presumed Donors/Benefactors --- the living people and lawful governments that were defrauded by these criminals in suits. 

Notice to agents is notice to principals; notice to principals is notice to agents.  Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.  NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS; NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

June 11th 2025

------------------

See this article and over 5300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.