Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Sunday, February 5, 2023

February Moves Us Forward

 By Anna Von Reitz

I have attempted and continue the effort to teach Americans their own history, the structure of their own government, and their own power as the rightful Inheritors of this country --- but, unavoidably, I find that I must also teach the context in which these present evils have proliferated.  I even have the unlikely obligation of addressing key aspects of occultism. 

So I am going to make a shocking (for most people) observation: 

Just as Americans live as inheritors of The Declaration of Independence while their government employees live under the requirements of the Constitutions, creating two populations --- one of Masters, one of Servants --- the God-born Elohim of the Bible stand above God-created Mankind. 

The Sons of God forever stand above the Sons of Man, though one reflects and mirrors the other. 

This is plainly stated in the Bible, but our attention is immediately drawn to the drama of Adam being created, Eve being created from Adam, and their assignment as caretakers and definers of the three dimensional world.  From there, we get drawn into the drama in the Garden of Eden, Adam's childish failure, Eve's punishment, Satan's punishment, and the contest between Eve's seed and Satan's seed.... 

These are important things to know, but they are also, in part, distractions. 

Our attention is focused on Mankind's Drama, when there is a far more important drama that determines the outcome of Mankind's Drama and everything else, and that is the Drama of the Sons of God. 

God is an immortal spirit, and naturally, the Sons of God are immortal spirits. 

Adam and Eve, the Created, are physical, and their progeny, the Sons of Man, are physical. 

We exist as both, simultaneously.  Our so-called "meat body" is Created Man; but our Spirit is born of God.  

The ancient Hebrews saw themselves as Sons of Adam, and considered the Sons of Adam to be Beasts akin to the Beasts of the Field; but they also saw themselves as Sons of God.  

This is why, in The New Testament, Jesus is sometimes called "the Son of Man" and sometimes called "the Son of God".  

This is what the conversation with the Sanhedrin in the context of The Passion is about, too -- the reference to the Prophet Isaiah saying, "Do you not know that you are gods?" 

We have forgotten that we are not only physical beings, we are spiritual beings. We aren't just meat-bodies enmeshed in animal-like needs and impulses, we are also the Sons of God, empowered by our Father. 

We focus on the physical to the exception of the spirit, day after day, year after year, and as a consequence, we sink deeper into death and become more alienated from life and the source of life.  

We lose our god-like energy and creative power as a result, and this is because we have been distracted. 

Our attention has been diverted to a sideshow, which centers around the results (physical) rather than the cause (spiritual). 

And that sleight of hand leaves us powerless. 

We have let the past go throughout January, painfully examining the things that have been dragging us down, the sad memories, the losses, the regrets, the injuries ---and now, in February, we consciously say good-bye to the past and the traumas and regrets and injuries of the past.  

In February, we seize hold of the present moment, take back our individual power, and practice redirecting our attention away from what THEY want us to focus on ---  and instead, actively engage in directing our own attention and focusing on what we want to nurture and create. 

This month, ask yourself constantly--- "What am I focusing on?" 

You will be shocked by how your attention is being captured and, as a result, how your energy is being captured, while what is important to you, what you want, is being ignored, bypassed, and even commandeered into a ditch. 

Once you identify what you are focusing on, ask yourself --- "Is this something good and beneficial for me to focus on?"

If not, chuck it. 

Redirect your attention to thinking about what you truly want and what you want to see happen in the world--- and as your attention refocuses, act upon it.  

It doesn't have to be any great heroic action.  A small step in the right direction will do. 

For example, you "wake up", ask yourself what you are focusing on, and realize that you are focusing on eating a very large tub of theater popcorn. 

Then you notice that this is diametrically opposed to what you want to focus on, which is regaining your health.  

So, you dump out the popcorn and take a walk around the block, shaking your head.  

Maybe you will remember seeing the subliminal popcorn advertisement flashing across the screen while you were watching football, maybe not.  

But you will start thinking and noticing how your attention is being commandeered to focus on things that don't interest you, don't benefit you, that you don't want or don't like, and often, things you can't do anything about because they are in the past or in another country or otherwise out of your hands.  

Your attention, your focus, is one of the most important and powerful tools that God gave you.  This month, become aware of it, and practice self-directing where your attention goes and being aware of what you are focusing on and spending your emotions on.  

This is important for your sake and for the sake of the whole world. 
Here to help you further conceptualize what I am talking about is a little mini-lesson from people who are already practicing "attention awareness" --- the folks at the INSPIRED YouTube channel:  


See this article and over 4000 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.  

Situation Report -- For All Those Who Need It Down and Dirty

 By Anna Von Reitz

This is the most comprehensive single explanation of the situation that I have ever heard.  Listen to this speech right now: 

And if you can't access via that link, here: 

And now, that you finally know and understand who is who and what is what and which rats are at the bottom of this, here's what to do about it: 

Your American Government had been standing vacant for decades, but  we walked back through the door in 1998, unraveled the "legal" chicanery used to undermine our lawful American Government, and we are back home, on the land and soil of this country --- and THEY are fully obligated to us to perform their duties under the Constitutions. 

Looking for lawful power?  Looking for peaceful resolution?  Looking for other Americans who are already on the move?  

Go here --- this is where the traditional American Government is organizing: 

Besides getting your political status properly declared and recorded and operating your Government the way it is supposed to be operated, we now have the answers to: 

Lawfully and legally stop paying all taxes. 

Recoup our land and other assets. 

Force the world's religious organizations to take action to correct the gross malfeasance of those responsible for administering the Jurisdiction of the Air.  

Force the dissolution of all commercial corporations that have engaged in unlawful activities that have injured people-- and do it on a worldwide basis.  

That includes the billionaire's "foundations" and the UN CORP and  NATO, INC. and so much more.  

They are all nothing but legal fictions --- pieces of paper claiming bankruptcy protection and bail-outs and credit and tax breaks from the Public they dis-serve.  

These evil corporations have no natural right to exist and it's time for them and the men who have misdirected their activities to bite the dust. 


See this article and over 4000 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.  

Why You MUST Take Action in Lawful Rebellion

 By Anna Von Reitz

I have mentioned many times before that if you become aware of a crime or even reasonably suspect that a crime has been or is being committed, you have an obligation to: (1) report it to the authorities; (2) take reasonable action against it. 

Reporting it to the authorities assumes that there are responsible law-abiding authorities to report it to, which has not been the case in Britain and The United States for many years.  However, we report it to them anyway, to make them 100% personally and commercially liable for their acts and omissions. And also to clear your skirts.  

The "Reasonable Action" part beyond the obligation to report crime is a less obvious and ill-defined aspect.  What, exactly, is "reasonable"? 

Most people and the common law agree that it is not necessary to risk your own life --- you can, but you don't have to --- to meet this requirement.  

You simply have to take whatever action you can "reasonably" take to resist crimes, such as coming to the aid of victims, refusing to take illegal orders, organizing groups (Neighborhood Watch, State Assembly Militias, Childrens' Health Defense Fund) to fight crime, organizing boycotts and work stoppages and similar actions to bring criminal agendas to a stop, organizing legal actions to involuntarily dissolve criminal corporations (e.g., Pfizer) and underlying crime syndicates (e.g., World Economic Forum).  

If you don't take every reasonable action you can take, you may be considered an accomplice or enabler, and be brought to justice yourself, as if you were part of the criminal activity itself by acquiescence. 

Americans who watched the "Lonesome Dove" mini-series some years ago may have cause to remember the character of Jake Spoon, who was hung by his own friends, Gus and Captain McCall.  He went down as a murdering horse thief, because he was riding with a gang of murdering horse thieves --- and despite his claim that he didn't murder anyone or steal any horses himself, he had to be treated as if he did, because he did nothing to resist the crimes committed by his companions or bring aid to the victims. 

That's the way actual Public Law works.  Be forewarned. Conspirators and collaborators are on the same path to destruction. 

If the corporations that are providing us with "governmental services" are engaged in criminal activity, as all of ours self-evidently now are, we have the absolute lawful and legal right and moral obligation to not pay taxes to them. We also have the absolute lawful and legal right and moral obligation to demand and enact their immediate involuntary dissolution and removal of the corporate veil to allow full prosecution.  

As most of our courts all operate under one of two forms of international law --- maritime and admiralty --- and as these have been imposed and interpreted on our shores by British Territorial Courts and British BAR Attorneys, this Golden Oldie (reposted below) from the British Lawful Rebellion organization back in the day is especially potent, both here and in the British Isles and throughout the former Commonwealth, as all the same laws and arguments apply:

Republished in full with permission from Matt at by Lawful

Legal and lawful tax withholding

Are you aware that paying taxes is actually unlawful and illegal?  Let’s show you why:

In accordance with domestic law and international law if you have reasonable cause to suspect that HM Government are involved in criminal activity, you are obligated by law to withhold any and all forms of funding and support.

Background info:

HM Government unlawfully and illegally authorised HM Armed Forces to invade Iraq, as well as Afghanistan and Libya, and kill over 1.4 million people and counting, including over 450,000 children and counting.  They had no UN authorisation, no mandate whatsoever, yet they committed and continue to commit mass murder, terrorism and crimes against humanity totally illegally and unlawfully.  This is not fiction this is recognised FACT! Recognised as fact by the UN itself, the Malaysian Capital’s War Crime Tribunal and the Foreign Affairs Office to name a very, very small few; many more will shortly be shown.

Ok, let’s not reinvent the wheel here.  There is a great deal of background information to be perused and gleaned from such websites as: We STRONGLY urge and recommend you spend a couple of hours or so on that site first so you arm yourself with the much needed background knowledge, confidence and conviction that not only are war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and terrorism being committed in your name, but also why withholding any and all forms of funding and/or support from HM Government is the absolutely lawful, legal and conscionable thing to do. By the time you have finished reading all the information provided for you here on this subject, you will be stunned and shocked at what you have learnt!

In law it is widely accepted throughout the world that if you become aware of, or have reasonable cause to suspect, that an organisation or person is involved in criminal activity, and yet you continue to fund and support said organisation or person, then you are guilty of committing a crime by association – commonly known as an ‘accessory’ or ‘abettor’ and committing an ‘ancillary offence’.  For example, from the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861

And from the International Criminal Court Act 2001

Did you know that if a person knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that crimes against humanity, war crimes and/or terrorism are or even just may be being committed by HM Government and HM Armed Forces, there are specific laws that obligates said person to withhold funding – such as taxes?



What is the official interpretation of ‘terrorism’ as stated in the Terrorism Act 2000

And section 15 of the same Act states very clearly…

Now read that last bit ‘2’ (b) again: knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that it [money/funds/tax] will or may be used for the purposes of terrorism. So, all that is required is reasonable cause to suspect that taxes or any other funds will or may be used to fund criminal activity; in this particular case ‘terrorism’.

What about Genocide, Crimes against Humanity, and War Crimes?

Click on this link to be redirected to article 6, 7 and 8 of the International Criminal Court Act 2001:

As you can see for yourself, it is quite clear that all three of these crimes have been and are being committed on the people of Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya.


People of Britain (and the world) deceived and lied to…that’s ‘fraud’ right?

This is where it gets even more interesting because according to the Fraud Act 2006 it would be safe to conclude that HM Government and HM Parliament are perpetual offenders on a daily basis!  So here goes; Section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006

Section 2 – Fraud by false representation

Section 3 – Fraud by failing to disclose information

Section 4 – Fraud by abuse of position


So ‘conspiracy’ must have been committed right?

The offence of conspiracy – according to the Criminal Law Act 1977

And according to the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 and here

Suffice to say that if a person knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that funding or any other support will or may be used for the purposes of terrorism, genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, fraud or conspiracy etcetera, said person is absolutely obligated both by law and conscience to withhold any and all forms of funding and/or support from the organisation or person(s) suspected of committing said crimes.

Evidence for reasonable cause to suspect criminal activity:

Ok, so let’s imagine that through your own research and beliefs you have decided to give Notice to HM Government that you are obligated by law and conscience to withhold tax, due to you having [overwhelmingly] reasonable cause to suspect that funds will or may be used to support criminal activity.  Firstly, you would need enough information to demonstrate to yourself and others why and how you have reasonable cause to suspect criminal activity by HM Government, HM Armed Forces and HM Parliament may be taking place.  Let’s be clear here, you do NOT need to provide evidence to prove a crime beyond reasonable doubt as you would if you were the prosecutor in a criminal lawsuit.  The only requirement in this instance is enough supporting evidence to demonstrate why you have reasonable cause to suspect that a crime may be being committed; and that is extremely easy to do in this case!

So imagine if the following people (listed below) had already gone before you and stated that they believe or have reasonable cause to suspect the Iraq war is unlawful and illegal:

•Kofi Annan, former Secretary-General of the United Nations
•All 27 lawyers of the Foreign Affairs Office – headed by Senior Legal Advisor Sir Michael Wood
•Elizabeth Wilmshurst, former Deputy Legal Adviser
•Independent enquiry lead by Dutch Supreme Court Judge Willibrord Davids
•Lady Manningham-Buller, former MI5 Chief
•Hans Blix, former United Nations chief arms inspector
•Sir Christopher Meyer, former UK ambassador to the US
•Major General Michael Laurie, former Head of the Defence Intelligence Staff
•Dr David Kelly, former United Nations weapon inspector
•Robin Cook, former Foreign Secretary, Leader of the House of Commons
•Nick Clegg, current Deputy Prime Minister
•Professor Philippe Sands QC Director of the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals
•Professor Robert Black QC Professor of Scots law, Edinburgh University, and architect of the Lockerbie trial in The Hague
•Professor Sean Murphy Associate professor of law at George Washington University
•Professor Vaughan Lowe Chichele Professor of Public International Law, All Souls College, Oxford
•Professor James Crawford Whewell Professor of International Law, Jesus College, Cambridge
•Professor Mary Kaldor Professor of global governance, London School of Economics
•Professor Christine Chinkin, professor of international law at the London School of Economics
•Jan Kavan, the president of the UN General Assembly
•Judge Abdul Kadar Sulaiman, Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, Malaysia
•Judge Salleh Buang, Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, Malaysia
•Judge Tunku Sofiah Jewa, Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, Malaysia
•Judge Alfred L. Webre, Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, Malaysia
•Judge Shad Saleem Faruqi, Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, Malaysia

Well, imagine no more…they already have!  And this is in no way a comprehensive list.

Click here to view and download the articles, reports and statements and official Judgements made by the people as listed above that becomes part of your overwhelming evidence that underpins your reasonable cause to suspect.  Did you know that in 2011 the Kuala Lumpur (Malasyia’s Capital city) War Crimes Tribunal found Tony Blair, George W Bush and associates guilty of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in regards to the unlawful and illegal Iraq invasion, and made several recommendations to the United Nations regarding this?  The full Judgement can be found here.

Giving Notice to HM Government:

Once you have given Notice to the appropriate parties that ‘in good mind and conscience and in accordance with law I am obligated to withhold funding and support due to having reasonable cause to suspect that criminal activity has been committed’, and supplied the evidence you have and the law that obligates you in this matter, then for any person to attempt to collect funds from you would be a criminal act, under both domestic and international law.

The Manual of Military Law states:

If a person, who is bound to obey a duly constituted superior, receives from the superior an order to do some act or make some omission which is manifestly illegal, he is under a legal duty to refuse to carry out the order and if he does carry it out he will be criminally responsible for what he does in doing so.

The Nuremburg Principles became international statute criminal law when they were adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1950. As these seven principles are the world’s primary international laws against war, it is the duty of every citizen of Member States of the United Nations to uphold and abide by these laws: [For the full pdf click here]

I. Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefore and liable to punishment.

II. The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.

III. The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.

IV. The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.


And just to repeat from the International Criminal Court Act 2001:

Section 55 – Meaning of “ancillary offence”

(1)References in this Part to an ancillary offence under the law of England and Wales are to—
(a)aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of an offence,
(b)inciting a person to commit an offence,
(c)attempting or conspiring to commit an offence, or
(d)assisting an offender or concealing the commission of an offence.

So for any person in an official capacity, to attempt to incite you to commit an offence, would not only be violating the law but they would be breaching public trust and therefore committing ‘Misconduct in Public Office’ which is an offence at common law and one that still carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.  And if you are not aware of the huge potential power of Private Prosecution Service, we suggest you click here to download some information.

Any official that attempts to harass, threaten, coerce or incite a you to commit an offence would need to be made aware of the extremely serious offence they may be about to, or have just committed.  It is quite clear to anyone who takes anything more than a cursory glance at this subject matter, that massive, despicable and heinous crimes have been and are continuing to be committed in our name, and with the tax from our sweat equity paying for it.  We are forbidden by law and conscience to continue to give funds to perpetrators of these most sinister and evil crimes, and now you have the legislation to back you all the way.

Are you prepared to let the following slide:

·         Genocide

·         Crimes against humanity

·         War crimes

·         Terrorism

·         Conspiracy

·         Fraud

·         Torture

Whilst you continue to give your support and funds?

--- End of Repost--- and my final two cents on today's topic: these corporations and their Masters will try to claim "sovereign immunity", but by descending to and operating as corporations, they lose all such claims and are reduced to the same status as any other corporation.  (See Titles 5 and 22 of Federal Code, where this is fully admitted for the Federal Corporations and all their State-of-State franchises, too.)  
They will also try to justify their actions by claiming that they are at "war" but this is an illegal mercenary "war" among corporations, not nations, and as such is purely criminal activity in nature.  Remember that.  So when they announce "wars" on "drugs" and "poverty" and "terrorism" be aware that they are inviting you to acquiesce to their lawless actions and support them in their crimes.  

STOP paying to support your own demise.  Quit right now.  Make up your mind before April 15.  


See this article and over 4000 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.  

Clean Air and Demand

 By Anna Von Reitz

The first thing that I want to observe is that neither I nor any other Federation Officer ever suggested that anyone join a Private Membership Association (PMA).  Any PMA. Ever.  

As the word "Association" should suggest, that is a group for U.S. British Territorial Citizens.  We,  Americans, don't do "associations" or "societies" and we certainly don't voluntarily "register" anything.   

If you are an ASN, you have the right and ability to join a PMA, if you want to, but that's a private matter, like joining a golf club.

So joining or not joining a PMA is a private choice. It has nothing to do with the American Government, our Federation, or anything else we are doing in our State Assemblies --- and never did. 

Second observation: a few ASNs in Arizona and California joined the Global Family PMA and liked it, so they talked it up among their friends in other Assemblies. This was just them talking privately, not in any official capacity at all, about something they discovered and liked, much like you might "share the news" about a new skin care product.   

Because people meet each other through their Assemblies it may have given the impression that joining the Global Family PMA was associated with the Assembly process somehow, but it never was, and I took pains on several occasions to make that distinction between the Assembly and any PMA perfectly clear. 

Third observation: partially because of the talk about all the positive talk about the Global Family PMA among members, I met and talked with the leadership of the Global Family Group and we began talking about -- as a separate issue entirely -- rebuilding the international trade banks and connecting them with the rest of the world.  This is a completely separate topic having nothing to do with the pre-existing Global Family PMA. 

Fourth observation: when we announced the formation of the Blue Dot Bank System and the concepts behind it, some people who were afraid of the banking collapse and in favor of the gold-backed currency rushed at us wanting to put their money in a safe bank.  I explained repeatedly that it would take time to build a completely separate bank system, issue American currency, and do everything else needed.  As months went on and the external situation with the commercial banks deteriorated, this group became more strident and anxious.  They wanted a safe bank and they wanted it NOW.  

Fifth observation: Global Family Group agreed to open up their PMA Bank to give these people a guaranteed safe haven, but they also explained in all their literature and their video presentations, that members would not be able to get money out of the PMA Bank until the new international trade bank was launched. The funds would be safe havened and locked down.  Both verbally and in writing, this was presented to everyone who took advantage of the opportunity to "safe haven" their Federal Reserve Note deposits.  

The advantage of rat-holding their Federal Reserve Note deposits was two-fold.  First, the private PMA Bank guaranteed no "bail ins" or seizures of depositor's accounts.  Second, even if the Federal Reserve Notes became worthless overnight (which is exactly what the IMF threatened two weeks ago), the PMA Bank would credit the deposits as  lawful money in the new international trade bank system when it opened.  

I have reviewed the literature and the videos and can confirm that each and every one of the people who opened an account in the PMA Bank and who deposited money in those accounts was made aware of the conditions and the benefits of "safe havening" their funds. 

Sixth observation: everyone who had established a profile on the LRS or LRO system as an American was eligible to join the credit side of the new international trade bank system last August.  Prepaid credit cards were ready to issue.  And on the very day that the LRS data was due to download and populate accounts and generate the cards and the whole process was to be set in motion, the LRS was collapsed due to internal food-fighting between the LRS and LRO.  

The LRO would have been next in line to download and populate accounts and get cards.  Instead, they ruined it for everyone.  We have the names and the faces and the IPN addresses responsible for the "run" on the LRS that caused Brett to shut it down. 

Seventh observation: this significantly delayed everything for everyone, including those who had safe havened deposits of FRNs in the private Global Family PMA Bank, which they would have been able to access along with the prepaid credit accounts.  

Eighth observation:  this brou-ha-ha between the LRS and LRO which was totally egotistical and unnecessary from the very start, hurt everyone, whether they had sense enough to realize that they were hurt or not.  In fact, it hurt everyone on a worldwide basis, because the LRS was designed to help everyone everywhere on Earth establish an account and receive pre-paid credit that they are owed. 

Ninth observation: this setback delayed progress and greatly increased expenses and technical requirements but as we were faced with having to build a replacement International Recording Service to be able to serve Offshore and Ex-Pat Americans and people from all around the world in need of recording service, the decision was made to automate it and make it more user friendly, to extend the block chain, and launch secure satellite networks. This has taken months and in the meantime, people who safe havened money in the PMA Bank got antsy for it, wanting access even though they knew that was not the deal they made.  

Tenth observation: throughout this saga, there has been a variety of options available to people.  They could open up an account in the PMA Bank and safe haven their funds for the duration. They could also leave their money in Wells Fargo and hope for the best.  They could open accounts in the PMA Bank or the new International Trade Bank system and simply leave them empty or with a token deposit of $5, so as to have the accounts ready to go. Many people have chosen to do exactly that. 

Eleventh observation: those who pushed to safe haven their funds in the Global Family PMA Bank were actually pushing for a big favor from the PMA Bank, because for the bank, their deposits are a liability.  They deposited "notes" ---I.O.U.s from a bankrupt corporation--- and the PMA Bank guaranteed that their deposits would be locked down safe from bail-ins and honored as cash once the new bank system kicked off.  

Put bluntly, these pushy individuals shoved themselves and their needs to the front of the line and even though they were told that the new system wasn't ready and told that they would not be able to access any funds they put in safe haven status, everything was about them. their fears, and their needs. They were more than willing to impose upon the Global Family PMA Bank and make it liable, so long as they got the safety they craved. 

Twelfth observation: no doubt many people acted in good faith, especially small depositors, who thought that the opening of the trade banks was imminent and were unprepared for the delay caused by the LRS shutting down.  Others were just being selfish and imposing on Global Family's PMA Bank to cover their tails -- "using" the PMA Bank, and not in the good sense of that word.   

Thirteenth observation: we soldiered on.  We overcame the setbacks. We built a whole new international recording system and were just getting that ready to launch when.... once again, the same group of people who shoved themselves to the fore and pushed to get safe haven accounts in the PMA Bank in the first place, started more fearful selfish crap rolling. 

Fourteenth observation:  now, these same people are all upset because they find out that they can't just access the funds that they safe havened in the PMA Bank --- as if this is any news to them?  As if they didn't push to get the bank to set up safe haven accounts for them?  As if the conditions weren't clearly explained in the videos everyone was required to watch and also presented in print when they opened their PMA Bank safe haven accounts?  

Fifteenth observation: these same people pushed the PMA Bank to set up accounts for them that are a liability and a disadvantage to the PMA Bank, under the known condition that they leave those funds dormant until the new banks open.  And then they have the brass eggs to make accusations against the Global Family PMA Bank that they imposed upon, because they want to violate a clear cut contractual agreement they made and withdraw their funds prior to the opening of the trade banks?  

Sixteenth observation: now these same people are going around saying that they have proof that Hunter and the Global Family Group are setting up a Ponzi Scheme.  They need to come forward with their "proof" right now, or they need to sit down, shut up, and take their lumps.  

Seventeenth observation: these same people are making a big "to do" over the fact that Hunter and Global Family have changed their phone numbers and emails, too, but all these same people had cause to know that this was planned as part of the build up and expansion of the new recording system and the actual opening of the prepaid credit side of the banks. They have no excuse for using this pre-planned change to flame fears, any more than they have cause to complain because their safe haven funds have in fact been safe havened according to their own desire and for their own advantage according to the contracts they signed. 

Eighteenth observation: all this nonsense has been used to create more unnecessary drama and upset and fear-mongering and has somehow been used to blame me and Harold and various other parties as if we had anything to do with it, when we don't and never have had anything to do with the PMA Bank, the agreements these people made as PMA members, or any of it.   Zero. Nada. 

Time for everyone to get their heads screwed on straight or get their blocks knocked off.  

People created those PMA Bank accounts for their own selfish advantage to gain security for themselves and their funds. They got precisely what they wanted.  Now they want to blame the bank--- which took the liability off their shoulders--- and this is just more of the typical Satanist bull crap of blaming the victim.  I would defend the bank in this case, even if it was Wells Fargo.  

Nineteenth observation:  I can guarantee that the Global Family Group is serious-minded about the goals of the new trade bank system and highly skilled.  They are not deeply enmeshed in the commercial bank system, which is an advantage, given the work that they are now engaged in. Why haven't I hired or invited in a lot of high level bankers in the commercial bank system?  For the very good reason that they are too indoctrinated to be of much help in building something completely different and new.  In many cases, they can't unwrap their training enough to conceptualize a trade bank and pre-paid credit. 

Now, if y'all think that clinging to the old system is possible, be my guest and go down with the ship. If you are done with selfishness, fear, greed, stupidity, and gossip ---ready for something brand new and wonderful, stand by. 

And in any event, know that: (1) the people spreading all this garbage are not being honest about what they did or why they did it; (2) those people trying to connect me or the Federation with their own activities-- imposing upon the Global Family PMA Bank to provide them with safe haven and then welching on their own contract--- are liars.

Plain and simple.  

In the next few days, I am told that the PMA Bank will be back online and ready to contact via the new independent communication system--- new emails, new phones, etc.  And all in our own control.  Our own servers. Our own satellites. 

Those who were first shall be last, and those who were last shall be first.  


See this article and over 4000 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.