Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9370 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Saturday, July 8, 2023

Response to the Assemblies and Public International Notice to Everyone Else

 By Anna Von Reitz

Mr. Edward Kennedy is a known Vexatious Litigant.  That means he has made so many groundless claims that the courts won't bother listening to him anymore. You can look him up on the internet.  

And this is no different.  Everything he raises (and lies about) has been answered repeatedly and in public as part of my website.  Just hit the search engine at: www.annavonreitz.com and hit search words. 

But he does point out a problem that many Assemblies have to navigate.  Let's just call them "Displaced Persons" who are trying to join our Assemblies under the misbegotten assumption that our Assemblies have to be THEIR Assemblies, when they are not. 

I know, I know, what a pain in the butt!  Why can't SOME people just find their right place and go there?  It should be as simple as realizing that you are in the wrong line at the grocery store or the wrong pew in church. 
Is it so hard to recognize the fact that if you are a Catholic and if you want to live in a theocracy, go join the nearest Municipal Assembly?  

And if you are a Tory and want to subject yourself to the King, go join the nearest District Assembly?  

Just get out of our State Assemblies and stop trying to commandeer them and make them into something they are not?  And not meant to be? 

Mr. Kennedy obviously wants his government to be a theocracy and which we just as obviously are not. He also wants the British King involved in some way that isn't clear, and no American in their right mind wants that outcome. 

That's why we fought the Revolution for eight long years.  To say good-bye to George III. 

If Mr. Kennedy wants Charles III, he is welcome to go hike over to the District Assembly and fit right in with what they are about and what they want to do.  

But that isn't us.  That is not what the State Assemblies do and that's not what we are here for. 

Instead of going gracefully and finding his right group and his right seat, this idiot has continued to spew venom and disruption and lies and gossip and every kind of crap you can think of for weeks and weeks and weeks. 

He still doesn't appear to grasp the fact that he has been given remedy if he really thinks he has been wronged in some way, and he hasn't pursued it. 

He still hasn't bothered to check out the Municipal and District Assemblies, either one.  He is set on the idea that our assembly has to be his assembly, when it's not, not, not. 

He continues to trespass like a Moose in love with a horse, trying to force us off track and to answer to his commands and assumptions about what we are doing, while doing nothing whatsoever to get himself and his wrong assumptions straightened out. 

This is the problem I warned the Assemblies about --- all these disoriented people coming in who actually belong in Municipal or District Assemblies, needing to get sorted out and redirected. 

Most will go happily and willingly.  Some befuddled and spiteful individuals will not.  

Please inform Mr. Kennedy and any others like him and send him (them) on his (their) way.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Land Grants Within the Global Trust

 By Anna Von Reitz

By now, all my students have learned the difference between land and soil. 

(Soil, as defined by British Land Law, is the top six inches of the land. We inherited that definition and distinction from the Brits and the Brits inherited it from the Romans.)

Please notice that the concept of "Soil" is an arbitrary one, but having made such a distinction, "Land" becomes what we think of as the Subsoil.

Also notice that "Soil" is the National Jurisdiction and the borders and boundaries of the "Soil" establish each country, whereas the Land underlying the soil is somewhat borderless and amorphous, and is completely contiguous worldwide, so that Land is an International Jurisdiction.

My students also know that the Roman Catholic Church assumed the existence of a Global Trust since 1302, and divided this Trust up into three General Jurisdictions --- Air, Land, and Sea.  

The Pope was assumed to be the Trustee over The Trust. 

So, the Pope turned to his most able and trusted assistants, and delegated administrative work to them.  

To the Spanish King, he gave responsibility for making Land Grants all over the world. 

To the British King, he gave responsibility for the flow of business and activities at Sea. 

To the rest of the Kings, he gave the administration of the Soil.  

And the Air Jurisdiction he kept for himself. 

As a practical matter, once the Spanish King made his Land Grants, they were "permanent", and the local Kings and Potentates in control of the Soil also gained control of the Land beneath it. 

The only way a grant could be changed or transferred was if the people to whom it was gifted (Note: land is sacred and can't be sold, only granted and gifted.) died out, voluntarily vacated, or were overcome in war.  

That's why the edjits took such pains to remove all of us to the Jurisdiction of the Sea, so as to leave our Land and Soil Jurisdictions vacated and subject to being claimed by them. 

Notice another thing about "land and soil" --- they are "inseparable" and have to exist together.  Regardless of where the land is, or whatever you do to it, it is by definition covered with "soil".  This is true at the bottom of the sea or the top of the mountain, whatever and wherever the top six inches is, the soil comes with the land and the land with the soil. 

When the Spanish King made his Land Grants and established the Cadastral Survey to locate and describe land in terms of its spot on the globe and its physical parameters, the already-existing nations inherited the land beneath their soil. 

So far, so good.  How did all this sort out with respect to our land and soil in America?  

In 1777, the Spanish King made a Grant of the Soil of this country on behalf of The Trust to the States of America. 

As my students have learned, "States of America" was a doing-business-as name of the Original Union of States formed in 1776.  So the original Union of States was given the Soil Jurisdiction. 

In 1778, the Spanish King made a Grant of the Land of this country on behalf of The Trust to The United States of America, which is the doing-business-as-name of our States operating in international venues.  

Thus by two separate Grants, one of Soil, one of Land, our country acquired its land and soil, with the Soil being held by the Original Union of States doing business as the States of America, and the Land being held by our Federation of States doing business as The United States of America.  

As long as there are Americans left to claim it, it's ours. 

The Brits and their Roman co-conspirators just hoped they could traffic us all off the Land and Soil Jurisdiction, one by one, by registering American babies as British Territorial U.S. Citizens, and eventually claim it was "abandoned"----- and secure it for themselves. 

Or sell it off to their Chinese Creditors. 

We woke up, their fraud was discovered, the Chinese got cold feet.  That's what is happening right now.  And that is why it's going on. 

So, now we come to another confusion about land and soil. 

The States of America, meaning the Original Union, also created a "Confederation" of business organizations from each State of the Union via The Articles of Confederation. 

That is, the same Original Union that received our Soil Jurisdiction Grants operated a business, the Confederation, that in turn operated what we know today as the Federal Republic, to provide "essential government services" to the individual States of the Union. 

And here's where things turn into a hairy ball of wax. 

The Original Union of States which holds the Soil Jurisdiction, operates under the name "States of America". 

Their Confederation of States-of-States operated under the description  "the united States of America" and "The Confederate States of America" and it was shut down --- and is still awaiting "reconstruction" after the Civil War.  

So which of these entities owns the Soil Grants? 

The Original Union of States.  

How can we be sure of that, given the extremely similar names?  

The Grants were made in 1777, and the Confederation wasn't ratified and didn't begin operations until 1781.  

The Original Union of States still holds the Soil Patents and The United States of America still holds the Land Patents. 

In practical terms, each County holds the Soil Patents and each State holds the Land Patents of those original Grants made by the Spanish King so many years ago.  

When we re-issued our Sovereign Letters Patent on November 4, 2015, we served Notice on the world that we, the actual Americans, are stil here, still claiming our Land and Soil. 

The great effort to defraud and disinherit us by guile and by trafficking us out into the Jurisdiction of the Sea via registering American babies as British Territorial U.S. Citizens did not succeed. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Condition of the Damned

 By Anna Von Reitz

Let me tell you what I see when I am walking down the street in a small city, Anchorage, Alaska, with a population of about 250,000.  

About half the people smile, and half look away as if annoyed or look unhappy and worried.

Those who smile don't always have a genuine smile or seem to see me. It's more of a habit or reflex for about half of those who smile. And I can see that. 

So, only about a quarter of the people on the street in Anchorage meet my eyes for a second and smile back with any genuine recognition. 

Some of those take a second-take, or pause in stride, or turn to look after me.  It has been so long since they made actual energetic contact that they are involuntarily shocked, as if I actually physically touched them in passing. 

But, of course, it was just a smile exchanged.

Or was it?  

A smile is just an outward sign of feeling, but what feeling and what kind of smile was it?  Was it love and goodwill?  Or joy?  Or a mask hiding malevolence?  A smile can be enigmatic, as Leonardo da Vinci taught us. 

My smile isn't enigmatic.  It's genuine.  I am actually paying attention as I pass smiles around like free chocolate chip cookies, made of positive energy. That positive, intentional energy hits the energy field surrounding the person I am smiling at with the slightest amount of resistance.  

Like a calling card, my smile gets checked out and a split second judgment is made whether or not to let that little chocolate chip cookie of pure energy in, or, will the intended recipient bounce it off? 

It's always a question --- one waitress accepts my "cookie", another does not.  One bank teller out of six stops to take a second look and smile back.  That I am actually noticing all this and keeping track of the responses I get may seem a little odd, but then, I was born to be a mathematician or some kind of scientist. 

And life is an endless opportunity for observation. 

So I observe.   

As I got older, my scope of vision changed from being superficial, focused on things like what kind of jeans or tennis shoes a person wore, to much more personal and important attributes.  

I found that if I exerted myself a little, I could see the energy centers that the Hindu people call chakras, not in color like the drawings one sees at health food stores and spas, but coming through to my perception just the same.  

I began to look harder because so many people have damaged energy centers.  It was strangely fascinating. The Third Chakra is the most often destroyed chakra of them all, and when it is gone, it is like a gaping hole right in the middle of the person afflicted. 

No wonder they feel empty.  They are. 

In people afflicted with this unseen wound, the energy from the first and second energy centers can't flow upward, and all their animal-like, visceral and sexual energy from the first and second chakras pools up with nowhere to go.  

They can't help feeling alienated and empty, because they are. They can't help being over-sexed and crazed and perverted and confused, because there is no way for their sexual and survival energy to flow as it is meant to flow and be dispersed. 

And then, in the 1990's I noticed a sharp uptake in the number of people I was seeing with this Third Chakra wound --- and the numbers of them just kept increasing like a contagion.  

As I travelled to big cities I just naturally noticed and kept count.  There were great numbers of these walking wounded in San Francisco and Denver and even Minneapolis last time I visited there. Scads of them in Madison, Wisconsin and Chicago, Illinois.  

With the advent of more sophisticated color TVs armed with surveillance technology, I found that all this spy tech had a reverse benefit.  I no longer had to travel to keep track of Third Chakra Wounding --- I could observe the phenomenon straight off the TV!  

Granted, the people you see on TV aren't usually normal Americans, but as you are watching news reports and seeing arson fires in L.A. or chemical smog in New York or whatever Disaster of the Day the media whores are pushing, I am just sitting back, noticing and counting, running rough percentiles in my head. 

About two-thirds of the people I see on TV and on the street have their Third Chakra blown away, leaving a great big flapping hole in the middle of their energy system. Why? 

It's obviously purposeful, and the work of a disease or a parasite or a weapon of some kind, that is attacking people and leaving them no connection to their higher emotions, their intellect, and their higher functions like conscience.

So I began quietly "interviewing" people with this affliction.  To a man, they admitted feeling disoriented, anxious, empty, alienated. And if I probed deeper, they admitted that they were driven by primal urges they couldn't stop. Binging on burgers and fried chicken at three o'clock in the morning. Drinking and drugging and getting into wild multi-partner orgies.... being hungry and horny all the time. 

Pardon my French, it's easy to see why.  These people aren't perverts and they aren't natural gluttons.  They are victims of something that is largely unseen and insidious --- whatever it is that is destroying the Third Chakra energy center of millions of people. 

In the last five years, this phenomenon has even begun appearing in the equivalent chakra systems of domestic animals. 

So, something has to be done. Inquiries made. Solutions found. 

Until then, probably 50 million people are wandering around this country with this terrible unseen wound, unable to assess what is wrong, feeling like they are going nuts.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

On Sovereignty

 By Anna Von Reitz

I recently brought attention to many excerpts from the United States Supreme Court concerning the topic of sovereignty ---which we published more than eight years ago in "You Know Something's Wrong When....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause".  

These quotes about sovereignty from the United States Supreme Court were selected to provide you with the definition of sovereignty, key cases that demonstrated the exercise of sovereignty, and what you are owed in terms of sovereignty as an American. 

This is a horse's mouth testimony from expert witnesses about the meaning, nature, and operation of sovereignty in this country, but if you would rather believe uneducated pundits, that's up to you. 

Besides drawing your attention to the Supreme Court definitions and prior decisions, we wish to clear up some additional rife misconceptions about the topic of sovereignty.  

Your sovereignty does not depend upon nor issue from any Constitution or institution. It is a gift to you from Nature and Nature's God, part of your unalienable character.   

We have noted elsewhere, however, that the World created by Mankind is a separate and lesser creation than the Earth.  

It should not surprise anyone that the sovereignty that is built into you by Nature, is a different kind of sovereignty than the quagmire of Sovereigns -- Kings and Queens and Potentates --  created by Mankind

Yet, even in this lesser and undesirable worldly creation, we nonetheless have our Sovereignty intact.  This form of Sovereignty that is created by men, derives its power from institutions that are also created by men.  

This worldly version of Sovereignty related to this country was won by the Force of Arms when we won The War of Independence, and it was settled upon this nation by William Belcher, a Colonel in the Continental Army. 

William Belcher was The Belle Cher of his generation, the Clan Chief, born and raised in this country. He inherited Sovereignty in his own right in England as a result of the Norman Settlement, which granted each of the Norman Barons sovereignty in their own right and their own kingdom in England. 

The Norman Barons and their progeny were and are the rightful rulers of England and the Donors to the 1689 Trust; if King John's progeny mess things up, the progeny of the Norman Barons are enabled (and required) to dissolve the Trust creating Great Britain.

The Hereditary Lord High Steward, Lord Talbot, has declared a Regency which is a first step toward that eventuality. 

When the time came for the same circumstance to present itself in America, William Belcher stepped forward and bequeathed sovereignty in their own right to every American who fought in The War of Independence, and to every American who would be born on our land and soil forever after.  

As in England nearly 700 years before, the Victory by Force of Arms here had the same effect as the Settlement of the Norman Conquest, only here,  every man was made a king and every plot of land a kingdom, not just a fistful of Barons. 

It was the same exact circumstance as the Norman Conquest, and William Belcher quickly ascertained that he was in Possession of the Victory, and like his own ancestral Benefactor, he was enabled to "share sovereignty".  So he did. 

George III's Sovereignty was forever alienated and displaced by the Sovereignty of William of Normandy and his Heirs in England, the Belle Chers.  The only scrap left for George III was a Territorial trusteeship on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, and a ten percent tribute interest in any gold that was mined.  

Imagine my amazement when someone suggested that my husband, James Belcher, "granted sovereignty" to anyone?  

How would that be?  

Every Continental Army Soldier and  Navy Sailor, and everyone born in this country ever since the War of Independence ended, already has their sovereignty, first from Nature and Nature's God, and second, ultimately, from William of Normandy. 

There has also been a pernicious misunderstanding mistaking the name "Belcher" as an English Surname.  It is not used as such.  Belcher is merely the English transliteration of Belle Cher, the name of our Clan. My husband does not use a Surname as such,  and if he did, it wouldn't be Belcher.  

Just as the Clan MacGregor has a Clan Chieftain known as "The MacGregor", the Belchers aka Belle Chers have a Clan Chieftain known as The Belle Cher.  Unlike the Scots Clans, however, that submitted to the rule of King John and his Heirs, the French Clan Belle Cher never did any such thing.   

King John was one of theirs. 

So we always had our equal or better standing than King John and his Heirs in England. That's why the Magna Carta still stands. 

That's why the British Monarch and the denizens of Westminster and the Holy See are all being called to account.  It's the reason for The Declaration of the Flag. 

It's the reason Lord Talbot is owed the Regency for England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales.  

Just because we haven't spoken for a long time, doesn't mean that we are dead, or that our contracts have lost their teeth. 

Every single President from George Washington to Joe Biden, except for Donald Trump, have been related to King John, the same Overseer of the Church's Commonwealth lands, still attached to the service of Pope Innocent III and his Successors, 

All the "Presidents" are Plantagenets in violation of the Conventions, Treaties, and Constitutions owed to this country, all acting in hidden conflict of interest. 

My husband's role is not to grant sovereignty to anyone, much less Sovereignty that Americans have already earned and which they received over 200 years ago. 

His role is to enforce the Sovereignty of this country and hold everyone, including the Plantagenets, accountable for their bad faith.  
 
Just as your rights are not created by nor granted to you by any Constitution, but are instead guaranteed by the Federal Constitutions -- a different concept entirely --- your Sovereignty is not granted, it's shared. 

Ironically, for all the grandstanding the Brits make about liberty and freedom and constitutional government, you can thank William the Conqueror for sharing his Sovereignty with his Barons, and you can thank his Barons for sharing their Sovereignty with you.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.