EXCLUSIVE! BREAKING NEWS!...JUDGE WILL ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST OBAMA...
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2012/01/exclusive-breaking-newsjudge-will-enter.html
Watch Georgia carefully in the next few days. It looks like the beginning of a domino effect could take place because of the ruling of this judge.
If more states attornys general get on this bandwagon Obama is in trouble big time.
Friday, January 27, 2012
Blue Republicans unite for Ron Paul
Critical Information to get Ron Paul Elected.
http://www.bluerepublican.org/
Blue Republicans ~ How To Register Republican For Ron Paul
Part 1
Part 2
http://www.bluerepublican.org/
Blue Republicans ~ How To Register Republican For Ron Paul
Part 1
Part 2
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Obama's ineligibility is finally exposed on the record of the court.
Date: 1/26/2012 2:13:10 PM
Subject: Georgia Court Case - IMPORTANT
This is an actual court case that took place in GA today....it had a live stream to it...Please keep it clean and remove all email addresses before forwarding and use BCC please
Thursday, January 26, 2012
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am
Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.
With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.
Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.
Game on.
5 minutes.
10 minutes.
15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.
20 minutes.
It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.
Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?
Certainly not.
Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.
2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.
Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1979. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1979, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Next witness.
Mr. Gogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of MA. Obama never resided in MA. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
What can we take away from this?
It’s interesting.
Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered
WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.
One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.
What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.
It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.
Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.
Subject: Georgia Court Case - IMPORTANT
This is an actual court case that took place in GA today....it had a live stream to it...Please keep it clean and remove all email addresses before forwarding and use BCC please
Thursday, January 26, 2012
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am
Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.
With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.
Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.
Game on.
5 minutes.
10 minutes.
15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.
20 minutes.
It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.
Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?
Certainly not.
Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.
2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.
Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1979. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1979, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Next witness.
Mr. Gogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of MA. Obama never resided in MA. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
What can we take away from this?
It’s interesting.
Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered
WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.
One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.
What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.
It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.
Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.
Newt Gingrich? Really?
In the first place, Newt Gingrich is the personification of the word “globalist.” Gingrich is a longtime member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Gingrich never saw a globalist agenda-item that he did not enthusiastically support such as: NAFTA, GATT, the WTO, FTAA, the North American Union (by whatever name it’s called at the moment), the NAFTA Superhighway, ad infinitum. Gingrich is as much committed to open borders as is Bill Clinton......
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin685.htm
by Pastor Chuck Baldwin
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin685.htm
by Pastor Chuck Baldwin
Why nothing changes after elections
We have a federal government in these united states now known as "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. aka THE UNITED STATES Inc. It is a corporation formed with the Organic Act of 1871. Corporations exist for profit. Corporations are managed by their President/CEO, the board of directors and the stock holders. Corporations operate to perpetuate corporate profits and to perpetuate the corporation itself. Corporations do not exist to benefit outsiders, customers, nor employees nor do they answer to any of these groups.
Corporations are set up to provide limited liability to the stockholders for the corporate actions or inactions. They exist to benefit the stockholders and shield them from liability which might result due to their action or inaction. The corporation appoints its board of directors, CEO/President, Secretary, and Treasurer. The customers and employees have no say in that selection. It is up to the owners/stockholders.
There is very little in the above that most people do not already know; with the one exception that perhaps you did not know the U.S. government is a corporation. I cannot speak for others, but I know that I do not personally own any stock in this corporation hence I have no real vote nor say in the management thereof. Perhaps you do. I suspect, however, that you do not because I do not know anyone who does; though I confess of the desire to know who the stockholders are.
We have in place a corporation for a government which is "of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation"....as with all such organizations. The corporation has assigned/appointed the supreme court justices to endorse their corporate policies and declare to the public that they are constitutional, and the congress/board of directors has steadily relinquished its powers to the CEO/President to operate as the corporate decision maker with Executive Orders. You do not need to wonder why they are not responsive to the desires of the people.
One has but to consider the basic structure of the system to understand how our country has gone so far off track and why. Anyone who protests, resists, or is opposed to the corporation threatens the perpetuation of the firm and is therefore a threat aka "potential domestic terrorist." A constitutionalist is such a threat because corporate policy and decisions which benefit the corporation run counter to the adherence to the constitution. Therefore to be a constitutionalist is to be anti-corporation which is to be seen as a threat to the perpetuation of the firm. Former military are thus classified because they took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic.
A domestic corporation seeking to overthrow the constitution and instill in its place corporate policy might well be viewed as a domestic threat.
neo
Corporations are set up to provide limited liability to the stockholders for the corporate actions or inactions. They exist to benefit the stockholders and shield them from liability which might result due to their action or inaction. The corporation appoints its board of directors, CEO/President, Secretary, and Treasurer. The customers and employees have no say in that selection. It is up to the owners/stockholders.
There is very little in the above that most people do not already know; with the one exception that perhaps you did not know the U.S. government is a corporation. I cannot speak for others, but I know that I do not personally own any stock in this corporation hence I have no real vote nor say in the management thereof. Perhaps you do. I suspect, however, that you do not because I do not know anyone who does; though I confess of the desire to know who the stockholders are.
We have in place a corporation for a government which is "of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation"....as with all such organizations. The corporation has assigned/appointed the supreme court justices to endorse their corporate policies and declare to the public that they are constitutional, and the congress/board of directors has steadily relinquished its powers to the CEO/President to operate as the corporate decision maker with Executive Orders. You do not need to wonder why they are not responsive to the desires of the people.
One has but to consider the basic structure of the system to understand how our country has gone so far off track and why. Anyone who protests, resists, or is opposed to the corporation threatens the perpetuation of the firm and is therefore a threat aka "potential domestic terrorist." A constitutionalist is such a threat because corporate policy and decisions which benefit the corporation run counter to the adherence to the constitution. Therefore to be a constitutionalist is to be anti-corporation which is to be seen as a threat to the perpetuation of the firm. Former military are thus classified because they took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic.
A domestic corporation seeking to overthrow the constitution and instill in its place corporate policy might well be viewed as a domestic threat.
neo
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
State of the Union Campaign Speech farce!
The Imposter in Chief is exposed for his bad policies.
Cato Institute scholars Malou Innocent, Chris Edwards, Neal McCluskey, Ilya Shapiro, Jerry Taylor, Dan Mitchell and Dan Ikenson respond to President Obama's 2012 State of the Union Address.
Video produced by Caleb O. Brown, Austin Bragg and Lester Romero.
Cato Institute scholars Malou Innocent, Chris Edwards, Neal McCluskey, Ilya Shapiro, Jerry Taylor, Dan Mitchell and Dan Ikenson respond to President Obama's 2012 State of the Union Address.
Video produced by Caleb O. Brown, Austin Bragg and Lester Romero.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Ron Paul's Foreign Policy. Is it dangerous, really?
Are the media and other candidates lying about Ron Paul's foreign policy?
What do active duty military and veterans have to say?
What do active duty military and veterans have to say?
Fanning/Baldwin - The Answer for Montana
http://fanning-baldwin.com/
My 38 years of multifaceted financial and leadership experiences gave me the diagnostic tools to understand, explain simply, and quantify exactly what caused the fraud-based mortgage crisis....
This is what so many people within the so-called Religious Right and establishment GOP just do not understand: they do not understand the fact that America is in the throes of a burgeoning police state. They have buried their heads in the sand for so long that they wouldn’t know what tyranny looked like if it came up and bit them on their blessed assurance!...
Read more from the only candidates in Montana that will actually CHANGE the system in such a way as to give the power back to the people.
http://fanning-baldwin.com/
 | I'm running for Governor of Montana because I love Montana. I'm angry, and so are my constituents. I am running for Governor in America's darkest hour because I am the only candidate with the credentials to lead and restructure our state's economy in a crisis. |
 | The recent passage of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and the reaction-or better, lack of reaction-by the GOP's Presidential candidates is a perfect example of how it will not matter to a Tinker's Dam which Republican candidate wins the nomination, unless that candidate is Congressman Ron Paul. |
Read more from the only candidates in Montana that will actually CHANGE the system in such a way as to give the power back to the people.
http://fanning-baldwin.com/
Saturday, January 21, 2012
What congress must do now to fix NDAA
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2012/01/19/what-congress-must-do-to-fix-the-damage-of-ndaa-and-deny-the-u-s-government-the-power-to-wage-war-on-americans/
Stewart Rhodes has written a scholarly article (link above) on what the US congress has to do now to fix it's terrible and what I will call treasonous NDAA law.
In the meantime we ran across a single sheet flyer being circulated around Kalispell that might be more dangerous to the cause of Liberty than it will help, but nonethless we present here to make it clear that people are losing their confidence and patience in the ablility of government to do anything at all to fix this situation in DC.
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/declarationofwar.pdf
The author of this document is unknown to me, but I picked this up at a meeting in Kalispell on January 3rd and upon asking where it came from was only told that somebody put it around on many cars as a flyer at many government offices and other parking lots in town.
It appears that more than a few people are beginning to realize they might not make it to another presidential election. Like I said, I don't know who was the author, and I didn't write it, but I present it here so you may be forewarned that there are people who are very, very upset with the NDAA.
Watch the oathkeepers website for a new video to be uploaded in the next few days of a talk given by Stewart Rhodes, the founder of Oathkeepers on this subject and more on 1 3 2012 at Sykes cafe in Kalispell.
The declaration of war document above has gone viral all over this nation in just a few days.
While I don't agree with armed resistance at this point, the document points to what might happen if government doesn't change direction and start keeping the law of the land.
When government perpetrates armed action against the people of this country like they are doing with over 50,000 SWAT raids each year, what would they expect but that the people would eventually rise up and throw off the yoke of tyranny? We can read and hear almost every day about SWAT raids gone wrong and innocent people getting hurt or killed. Is all this being done deliberately to make Americans lose patience and start something? I will let you answer that for yourself.
Just know this. There are over 100 MILLION firearms owners in this country, and most of them own far more than just one gun. Agents of government should be acutely aware of that fact and also that they took an oath when they got their job, to uphold and defend the US Constitution. They should read that document and make up their minds to keep that oath regardless of the cost. That is the only way they will avoid a terrible judgement by Almighty God at the end of their lives, and maybe the wrath of the people of this country when the people finally say ENOUGH to tyranny.
What would cause such a catastrophy? How about an unavoidable financial meltdown? Do you think it can't happen here? Think again.
If you want to do something to prevent this breakdown of law and order, send your county sheriff to the CSPOA convention. You don't have much time to get them to go.
Details here: http://www.countysheriffproject.org/jan31-public-event
Paul Stramer
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Stewart Rhodes has written a scholarly article (link above) on what the US congress has to do now to fix it's terrible and what I will call treasonous NDAA law.
In the meantime we ran across a single sheet flyer being circulated around Kalispell that might be more dangerous to the cause of Liberty than it will help, but nonethless we present here to make it clear that people are losing their confidence and patience in the ablility of government to do anything at all to fix this situation in DC.
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/declarationofwar.pdf
The author of this document is unknown to me, but I picked this up at a meeting in Kalispell on January 3rd and upon asking where it came from was only told that somebody put it around on many cars as a flyer at many government offices and other parking lots in town.
It appears that more than a few people are beginning to realize they might not make it to another presidential election. Like I said, I don't know who was the author, and I didn't write it, but I present it here so you may be forewarned that there are people who are very, very upset with the NDAA.
Watch the oathkeepers website for a new video to be uploaded in the next few days of a talk given by Stewart Rhodes, the founder of Oathkeepers on this subject and more on 1 3 2012 at Sykes cafe in Kalispell.
The declaration of war document above has gone viral all over this nation in just a few days.
While I don't agree with armed resistance at this point, the document points to what might happen if government doesn't change direction and start keeping the law of the land.
When government perpetrates armed action against the people of this country like they are doing with over 50,000 SWAT raids each year, what would they expect but that the people would eventually rise up and throw off the yoke of tyranny? We can read and hear almost every day about SWAT raids gone wrong and innocent people getting hurt or killed. Is all this being done deliberately to make Americans lose patience and start something? I will let you answer that for yourself.
Just know this. There are over 100 MILLION firearms owners in this country, and most of them own far more than just one gun. Agents of government should be acutely aware of that fact and also that they took an oath when they got their job, to uphold and defend the US Constitution. They should read that document and make up their minds to keep that oath regardless of the cost. That is the only way they will avoid a terrible judgement by Almighty God at the end of their lives, and maybe the wrath of the people of this country when the people finally say ENOUGH to tyranny.
What would cause such a catastrophy? How about an unavoidable financial meltdown? Do you think it can't happen here? Think again.
If you want to do something to prevent this breakdown of law and order, send your county sheriff to the CSPOA convention. You don't have much time to get them to go.
Details here: http://www.countysheriffproject.org/jan31-public-event
Paul Stramer
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Judge Whacks Obama
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena/
A Georgia judge has refused a demand from Barack Obama to quash a subpoena to appear at a series of administration hearings Jan. 26 at which residents of the state are challenging, as allowed under a state law, his name on the 2012 presidential ballot.
A Georgia judge has refused a demand from Barack Obama to quash a subpoena to appear at a series of administration hearings Jan. 26 at which residents of the state are challenging, as allowed under a state law, his name on the 2012 presidential ballot.
Is Obama trying to rig the census?
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin684.htm
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION "RIGGING" US CENSUS BY COUNTING ILLEGAL ALIENS
By Chuck Baldwin
January 20, 2012
NewsWithViews.com
Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, And Ohio To Lose Congressional Seats
The Barack Obama administration is quietly in the process of rigging use of the US Census of 2010, which deliberately counted millions of illegal aliens, for the purpose of restructuring the apportionment of the US House of Representatives. Accordingly, as candidates for Governor and Lieutenant Governor of one of the negatively affected states (Montana), Mr. Bob Fanning and I have joined with several others in becoming amici curiae in a pending federal lawsuit brought by the State of Louisiana against the US Secretary of Commerce, et al., which was filed January, 13, 2012 in the United States Supreme Court. ......
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION "RIGGING" US CENSUS BY COUNTING ILLEGAL ALIENS
By Chuck Baldwin
January 20, 2012
NewsWithViews.com
Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, And Ohio To Lose Congressional Seats
The Barack Obama administration is quietly in the process of rigging use of the US Census of 2010, which deliberately counted millions of illegal aliens, for the purpose of restructuring the apportionment of the US House of Representatives. Accordingly, as candidates for Governor and Lieutenant Governor of one of the negatively affected states (Montana), Mr. Bob Fanning and I have joined with several others in becoming amici curiae in a pending federal lawsuit brought by the State of Louisiana against the US Secretary of Commerce, et al., which was filed January, 13, 2012 in the United States Supreme Court. ...
Friday, January 20, 2012
Friday, January 13, 2012
3 Takeaways from the New Hampshire Primary
Reason.tv says there is a civil war afoot to decide the future of the GOP!
And the Stupid media bias continues:
Rand Paul on Dad’s ‘Dangerous’ Campaign
Media mobs Ron Paul and explains what happened.
And the Stupid media bias continues:
Rand Paul on Dad’s ‘Dangerous’ Campaign
Media mobs Ron Paul and explains what happened.
Thursday, January 12, 2012
What if Elections don't matter, and they are lying to you about Ron Paul
Freedom Watch - Judge Napolitano - What If ' They ' Are Lying To You About Ron Paul ?
Do Republicans Know What They Really Want?
CNN - Admits What Happens WHEN Ron Paul Wins Iowa!
Ron Paul: The only one who can beat Obama!
Ron Paul and the Libertarian Revolution - Freedom Watch
GOP Strategist: Ron Paul Can Beat Romney - Fox News
Do Republicans Know What They Really Want?
CNN - Admits What Happens WHEN Ron Paul Wins Iowa!
Ron Paul: The only one who can beat Obama!
Ron Paul and the Libertarian Revolution - Freedom Watch
GOP Strategist: Ron Paul Can Beat Romney - Fox News
Mike Adams of Natural News endorses Ron Paul
10 reasons why even democrats, liberals and progressives are choosing Ron Paul over Obama
http://www.naturalnews.com/z034630_Ron_Paul_democrats_liberals.html
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews) It's a seemingly absurd idea on the surface: Why would democrats and liberals want to vote for Ron Paul (a Republican) over President Obama? Maybe because they want freedom instead of tyranny, it turns out. Because if you're a total slave to the police state, it doesn't really matter whether you're on the left or the right, does it?
Here, I give you ten solid reasons why even liberals and progressives are supporting Ron Paul. And by the way, I don't worship Ron Paul or any individual. What I honor is the principles that Ron Paul stands for -- the very same principles President Obama has outright abandoned in his broken promises and disturbing reversals against the American people. Out of all the candidates, only Ron Paul has the ethical and moral strength to carry out his office from a place of principle rather than betrayal.
See the 10 reasons here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/z034630_Ron_Paul_democrats_liberals.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/z034630_Ron_Paul_democrats_liberals.html
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews) It's a seemingly absurd idea on the surface: Why would democrats and liberals want to vote for Ron Paul (a Republican) over President Obama? Maybe because they want freedom instead of tyranny, it turns out. Because if you're a total slave to the police state, it doesn't really matter whether you're on the left or the right, does it?
Here, I give you ten solid reasons why even liberals and progressives are supporting Ron Paul. And by the way, I don't worship Ron Paul or any individual. What I honor is the principles that Ron Paul stands for -- the very same principles President Obama has outright abandoned in his broken promises and disturbing reversals against the American people. Out of all the candidates, only Ron Paul has the ethical and moral strength to carry out his office from a place of principle rather than betrayal.
See the 10 reasons here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/z034630_Ron_Paul_democrats_liberals.html
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
RON PAUL: CONSTITUTIONALIST OR RACIST AND ANTI-SEMITE?
http://www.newswithviews.com/Goldstein/mitchell106.htm
By Coach Mitchell Goldstein
January 11, 2012
An American Jew comments on Ron Paul and clears the air once and for all.
By Coach Mitchell Goldstein
January 11, 2012
An American Jew comments on Ron Paul and clears the air once and for all.
Is Jon Huntsman another Wolf in Sheeps Clothing?
Both Jon Huntsman And Barack Obama Agree
If Jon Huntsman agrees with Obama on all these issues what makes you think he will be any different?
These are all Marxist ideas and evidently Huntsman doesn't understand the ideas of the founders at all.
If he did he wouldn't be agreeing with the Marxist illegal alien imposter uspurer with his feet up on our furniture in DC.
If Jon Huntsman agrees with Obama on all these issues what makes you think he will be any different?
These are all Marxist ideas and evidently Huntsman doesn't understand the ideas of the founders at all.
If he did he wouldn't be agreeing with the Marxist illegal alien imposter uspurer with his feet up on our furniture in DC.
Ron Paul's New Hampshire Victory Speech (Fox News)
Ron Paul is America's leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, sound money, and a pro-America foreign policy.
To spread the message, visit and promote the following websites:
http://www.ronpaul.com/
http://store.ronpaul.com/
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
http://www.whyronpaul.com/
http://www.ronpaulcountry.com/
http://www.house.gov/paul
http://www.dailypaul.com/
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/
http://www.ronpaulflix.com/
New World Order House of Cards
The move by the international bankster cabal to create their new world order is coming apart at the seams.
2012: Evidence Suggests Defeat for the New World Order
As the illustration by David Dees suggests the New World Order is a house of cards that depends on secrecy and deception. Their whole plane is built on Fraud, Deception, Threat, Duress and Coercion.
It's also built on the blood of the genocides that continuous wars create in the victim countries.
That genocide is what they have in store for America but they were not counting on Ron Paul and the Internet waking up the people of this country before they had confiscated our firearms.
Now their whole plan is in jeopardy and I would not want to trade places with any of them.
Read this very excellent article to get the details:
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/01/2012-evidence-suggests-defeat-for-new.html
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
2012: Evidence Suggests Defeat for the New World Order
As the illustration by David Dees suggests the New World Order is a house of cards that depends on secrecy and deception. Their whole plane is built on Fraud, Deception, Threat, Duress and Coercion.
It's also built on the blood of the genocides that continuous wars create in the victim countries.
That genocide is what they have in store for America but they were not counting on Ron Paul and the Internet waking up the people of this country before they had confiscated our firearms.
Now their whole plan is in jeopardy and I would not want to trade places with any of them.
Read this very excellent article to get the details:
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/01/2012-evidence-suggests-defeat-for-new.html
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)