Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2500 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Monday, March 27, 2017

Do Your Ears Hang Low?


By Anna Von Reitz

How many of you remember the children's song, "Do Your Ears Hang Low?"  --- Remember this line--- "Do your ears hang low?  Do they wobble to and fro?  Can you throw them over your shoulder like a Continental Soldier?....."

This song dates from Revolutionary War times.  Although it sounds silly and children still delight in it, the "ears" the rowdy Colonists were talking about weren't attached to their heads, and the song was regularly sung by those same Continental Soldiers on the march--- similar to the Marines singing "Sound Off!" as they march.

As the song makes very clear, there were soldiers called "Continental Soldiers" -- and it is also clear that they were the American soldiers fighting in the Revolutionary War.  What other "Continental Soldiers" have you ever heard of? 

They were called "Continental Soldiers" and sometimes just "Continentals" because they were landsmen not sailors, and they were protecting their land from British invasion.

Continental Soldier equals "Land Soldier" and Continental United States equals "Land United States".  It was the militias of the land that defeated the British sea-borne attackers. 

Please note these same soldiers were called "Colonial Soldiers" or just "Colonials".  This in turn references the fact that the Revolutionary War was supported by the 13 Colonies.

What do you know--- or should you know--- about the 13 Colonies? 

First, they were all very different, not just in location, but in derivation.  Some of the colonies were established by England--- New England and Virginia, for example--- and were funded in the early days by British investment companies: New England Company, Virginia Company, etc. 

Others were founded by other European Monarchies and their investment companies--- New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland, for example, were not founded or financed by England.  

Catholic Delaware and Maryland stood cheek and jowl with Protestant Virginia Colony. 

This should give everyone a clue that when the American Colonies stood up together and acted as one accord as Americans, it was not as the popular historians would have you believe a matter of a united America standing against the British.  It was a matter of colonies of various European nations breaking away from the domination of Europe, and in the case of Maryland and Delaware-- breaking away from the control of the Pope. 

Nothing like it had ever been seen in the history of the world.  No colony had ever broken free of the grip of the sponsoring nation.  And here you had thirteen of them, all going for broke, and repudiating the claims of the assorted European Monarchies and the Pope, together, at once. 

As such, the American Revolution was a revolution of thought, a new idea, and that idea was that men have the right of freewill and self-determination given them by their Creator, and no man--- no Monarch, no Pope -- has the right to dictate another's conscience, lay claim to his body or his land or his assets, or otherwise inflict taxes and "injuries" or require payments for services rendered without his consent. 

It wasn't just the King of England being given a send up.  It was the King of France, the King of the Netherlands, the King of Denmark, the King of Spain-----all the European Monarchs and the Pope----being given their walking papers.

So now you have some key information that has been missing, perhaps, from your education on these subjects.  I had Michael R. Hamilton send me an email and accuse me of just making up the name "Continental United States" and "Continental Marshals".

Well, if I made it up, then I would own the copyright to it, correct?  And there would be no need for the flap over who "owns" or doesn't own the Continental Marshals service.

But, regrettably, I didn't think of it.  The Founders did. 

The need for the Continental Marshals arose soon after the adoption of the actual Constitution, and it arose as a result of splitting the international jurisdiction owed to the united Colonies acting as the united "States of America" into delegated and undelegated powers. 

In 1790, George Washington organized the first United States Districts and the first US Marshals service as a part of the fall-out of the federal Judiciary Act.  They were assigned to protect the newly mandated federal maritime and admiralty courts.  They served in the delegated international jurisdiction created by The Constitution. 

In the same year, Benjamin Franklin organized the Continental Marshals to operate within the already established Postal Districts, to protect the Post Offices and Post Roads. Over time, the Continental (Land) Marshals became known as Federal Marshals.  They served the states and the people to maintain and enforce the Public Law governing the undelegated portion of international jurisdiction that was retained by the states and the people.  (Amendment X of the Bill of Rights).

Easily within my lifetime and most of yours, you have heard of both "Federal Marshals" and "US Marshals" but probably never knew the difference. 

Confusion reigns because from the foundations of this country there have always been two (or more) entities calling themselves the "United States". 

To shed more light on this circumstance, I am here reprinting all of one of the immortal Howard Freeman's articles.

Please note that since Howard wrote this some time back in the 1990's or 2000's, the Uniform Commercial Code has been renumbered and the actual Code Section that allows you to retain your constitutional guarantees is no longer UCC 1-207, but is now instead UCC 1-308.  

Also note the confusion that arises at the end of the article when even Howard Freeman used "Federal" as a catch-all term instead of distinguishing between "US" (delegated) and "Federal" (non-delegated) powers. 

It was to avoid this confusion that I suggested resurrecting the original name "Continental Marshals" and using that instead of "Federal Marshals" so that people would more readily grasp the fact that the Continental Marshals work for the land jurisdiction states and the people and be able to set them apart from "United States Marshals" who work for the incorporated UNITED STATES, INC.

Thanks to both ignorance and guile in some quarters, the re-use of the name "Continental Marshals" was used to spawn a new and different confusion--- at least in the minds of some less informed people--- who have attempted to call state militiamen "continental marshals". 

It boils down to this, folks--- the states of the union have the iron-clad guarantee that they can keep their "well-regulated militias" and they need to make use of that guarantee by retaining that name for their state-based armed forces.  There is a fundamental guarantee lost by calling militiamen "marshals".

When we knowingly operate in the international jurisdiction of the sea, we have historical precedent going back to Ben Franklin for using officers called "Continental Marshals" and later "Federal Marshals" to enforce the undelegated international jurisdiction owed to the states and people.

If we want to retain our freedom and restore our lawful government instead of going off the tracks and engaging in an insurrectionist folly, it only makes sense to cut the confusion to the bone and call offices and officers by their historically correct names. 

As you read this article, "The Two United States and the Law" also bear in mind that since Freeman wrote this---and although what he says remains fundamentally true---another sleight of hand has taken place and the original "United States" he correctly refers to as the "continental United States" has dropped completely off the board (unless we resurrect it) and the "Two United States" currently being employed by the rats in Congress are the Territorial United States (what Freeman calls the "Federal United States") and the Municipal United States, so that we are denied access to any of the constitutional guarantees as long as we submit to being counted either "United States Citizens" or "citizens of the United States":

The Two United States and the Law
by Howard Freeman

Our forefathers, weary of the oppressive measures that King George III’s government forced upon them, in common declared their independence from England in 1776. They were not expected to be successful in that resistance. The moneyed people had backed England for two major reasons. First, our forefathers wanted a rigid, written Constitution “set in concrete.” They were familiar with the so-called Constitution of England which consisted largely of customs, precedents, traditions, and understandings, often vague and always flexible. They wanted the principle of English common law, that an act done by any official person or law-making body beyond his or its legal competence was simply void. Second, the thirteen little colonies desired to base their union on substance (gold and silver) — real money. They well knew how the despotic governments of Europe were mortgaged to the hilt — lock, stock, and barrel, the land, the people, everything — to certain wealthy men who controlled the banks, the currency, and all credit, who lent credit but did not loan gold and silver!
The United States of America was made up of a union of what is now fifty sovereign States, a three-branch (legislative, executive, and judicial) Republic known as The United States of America, or as termed in this article, the Continental United States. Its citizenry live in one of the fifty States, and its laws are based on the Constitution, which is based on Common Law.
Less than one hundred years after we became a nation, a loophole was discovered in the Constitution by cunning lawyers in league with the international bankers. They realized that a separate nation existed, by the same name, that Congress had created in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. This “United States” is a Legislative Democracy within the Constitutional Republic, and is known as the Federal United States. It has exclusive, unlimited rule over its citizenry, the residents of the District of Columbia, the territories and enclaves (Guam, Midway Islands, Wake Island, Puerto Rico, etc.), and anyone who is a citizen by way of the 14th Amendment (naturalized citizens).
Both United States have the same Congress that rules in both nations. One “United States,” the Republic of fifty States, has the “stars and stripes” as its flag, but without any fringe on it. The Federal United States’ flag is the stars and stripes with a yellow fringe, seen in all the courts. The abbreviations of the States of the Continental United States are, with or without the zip codes, Ala., Alas., Ariz., Ark., Cal., etc. The abbreviations of the States under the jurisdiction of the Federal United States, the Legislative Democracy, are AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, etc. (without any periods).
Under the Constitution, based on Common Law, the Republic of the Continental United States provides for legal cases (1) at Law, (2) in Equity, and (3) in Admiralty:
(1) Law is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense. It is the will of the majority, the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces, to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all. Since an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force — for the same reason — cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups. Law allows you to do anything you want to, as long as you don’t infringe upon the life, liberty or property of anyone else. Law does not compel performance. Today’s so-called laws (ordinances, statutes, acts, regulations, orders, precepts, etc.) are often erroneously perceived as law, but just because something is called a “law” does not necessarily make it a law. [There is a difference between “legal” and “lawful.” Anything the government does is legal, but it may not be lawful.]
(2) Equity is the jurisdiction of compelled performance (for any contract you are a party to) and is based on what is fair in a particular situation. The term “equity” denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the intercourse of men with men. You have no rights other than what is specified in your contract. Equity has no criminal aspects to it.
(3) Admiralty is compelled performance plus a criminal penalty, a civil contract with a criminal penalty.
By 1938 the gradual merger procedurally between law and equity actions (i.e., the same court has jurisdiction over legal, equitable, and admiralty matters) was recognized. The nation was bankrupt and was owned by its creditors (the international bankers) who now owned everything — the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all the States and their legislatures and executives, all the land, and all the people. Everything was mortgaged in the national debt. We had gone from being sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments to discharge our debts with limited liability, instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin.
The remainder of this article explains how this happened, where we are today, and what remedy we have to protect ourselves from this system.
Our Present Commercial System of “Law”
and the REMEDY Provided for Our Protection
The present commercial system of “law” has replaced the old and familiar Common Law upon which our nation was founded. The following is the legal thread which brought us from sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) to discharge our debts with limited liability instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin.

The change in our system of law from public law to private commercial law was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the Erie Railroad v. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case, in the same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the procedures of Equity. Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions were based upon public law — or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional limitation. Since 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions are based upon what is termed public policy.
Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the Negotiable Instrument’s Law, which is a branch of the international Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, which system of law was made uniform throughout the fifty States through the cunning of the Congress of the United States (which “United States” has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, as distinguished from the “United States,” which is the Union of the fifty States).
In offering grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes) which the Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union for education, highways, health, and other purposes, Congress bound all the States of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal United States (as distinguished from the Continental United States). The fifty States accepted the “benefits” offered by the Federal United States as the consideration of a commercial agreement between the Federal United States and each of the corporate States. The corporate States were then obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United States and also to assume their portion of the equitable debts of the Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the credit loaned. The credit which each State received, in the form of federal grants, was predicated upon equitable paper.
This system of negotiable paper binds all corporate entities of government together in a vast system of commercial agreements and is what has altered our court system from one under the Common Law to a Legislative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law. Those persons brought before this court are held to the letter of every statute of government on the federal, state, county, or municipal levels unless they have exercised the REMEDY provided for them within that system of Commercial Law whereby, when forced to use a so-called “benefit” offered, or available, to them, from government, they may reserve their former right, under the Common Law guarantee of same, not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement, that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.
This is exactly how the corporate entities of state, county, and municipal governments got entangled with the Legislative Democracy, created by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, and called here The Federal United States, to distinguish it from the Continental United States, whose origin was in the Union of the Sovereign States.
The same national Congress rules the Continental United States pursuant to Constitutional limits upon its authority, while it enjoys exclusive rule, with no Constitutional limitations, as it legislates for the Federal United States.
With the above information, we may ask: “How did we, the free Preamble citizenry of the Sovereign States, lose our guaranteed unalienable rights and be forced into acceptance of the equitable debt obligations of the Federal United States, and also become subject to that entity of government, and divorced from our Sovereign States in the Republic, which we call here the Continental United States?” We do not reside, work, or have income from any territory subject to the direct jurisdiction of the Federal United States. These are questions that have troubled sincere, patriotic Americans for many years. Our lack of knowledge concerning the cunning of the legal profession is the cause of that divorce, but a knowledge of the truth concerning the legal thread, which caught us in its net, will restore our former status as a free Preamble citizen of the
Republic. The answer follows:
Our national Congress works for two nations foreign to each other, and by legal cunning both are called The United States. One is the Union of Sovereign States, under the Constitution, termed in this article the Continental United States. The other is a Legislative Democracy which has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, here termed the Federal United States. Very few people, when they see some “law” passed by Congress, ask themselves, “Which nation was Congress working for when it passed this or that so-called law?” Or, few ask,
“Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of the Republic, or does this particular law apply only to residents of the District of Columbia and other named enclaves, or territories, of the Democracy called the Federal United States?”
Since these questions are seldom asked by the uninformed citizenry of the Republic, it was an open invitation for “cunning” political leadership to seek more power and authority over the entire citizenry of the Republic through the medium of “legalese.” Congress deliberately failed in its duty to provide a medium of exchange for the citizenry of the Republic, in harmony with its Constitutional mandate. Instead, it created an abundance of commercial credit money for the Legislative Democracy, where it was not bound by Constitutional limitations. Then, after having created an emergency situation, and a tremendous depression in the Republic, Congress used its emergency authority to remove the remaining substance (gold and silver) from the medium of exchange belonging to the Republic, and made the negotiable instrument paper of the Legislative Democracy (Federal United States) a legal tender for Continental United States citizenry to use in the discharge of debts.
At the same time, Congress granted the entire citizenry of the two nations the “benefit” of limited liability in the discharge of all debts by telling the citizenry that the gold and silver coins of the Republic were out of date and cumbersome. The citizens were told that gold and silver (substance) was no longer needed to pay their debts, that they were now “privileged” to discharge debt with this more “convenient” currency, issued by the Federal United States. Consequently, everyone was forced to “go modern,” and to turn in their gold as a patriotic gesture. The entire news media complex went along with the scam and declared it to be a forward step for our democracy, no longer referring to America as a Republic.
From that time on, it was a falling light for the Republic of 1776, and a rising light for Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal Democracy, which overcame the depression, which was caused by a created shortage of real money. There was created an abundance of debt paper money, so-called, in the form of interest-bearing negotiable instrument paper called Federal Reserve Notes, and other forms of paperwork credit instruments.
Since all contracts since Roosevelt’s time have the colorable consideration of Federal Reserve Notes, instead of a genuine consideration of silver and gold coin, all contracts are colorable contracts, and not genuine contracts. [According to Black’s Law Dictionary (1990), colorable means “That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth.”]
Consequently, a new colorable jurisdiction, called a statutory jurisdiction, had to be created to enforce the contracts. Soon the term colorable contract was changed to the term commercial agreement to fit circumstances of the new statutory jurisdiction, which is legislative, rather than judicial, in nature. This jurisdiction enforces commercial agreements upon implied consent, rather than full knowledge, as it is with the enforcement of contracts under the Common Law.
All of our courts today sit as legislative Tribunals, and the so-called “statutes” of legislative bodies being enforced in these Legislative Tribunals are not “statutes” passed by the legislative branch of our three-branch Republic, but as “commercial obligations” to the Federal United States for anyone in the Federal United States or in the Continental United States who has used the equitable currency of the Federal United States and who has accepted the “benefit,” or “privilege,” of discharging his debts with the limited liability “benefit” offered to him by the Federal United States … EXCEPT those who availed themselves of the remedy within this commercial system of law, which remedy is today found in Book 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code at Section 207.
When used in conjunction with one’s signature, a stamp stating “Without Prejudice U.C.C. 1-207” is sufficient to indicate to the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals (called “courts”) that the signer of the document has reserved his Common Law right. He is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial obligation, of any commercial agreement that he did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as would be the case in any Common Law contract.
Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103, the statute, being enforced as a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be construed in harmony with the old Common Law of America, where the tribunal/court must rule that the statute does not apply to the individual who is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the remedy provided in this new system of law. He retains his former status in the Republic and fully enjoys his unalienable rights, guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic, while those about him “curse the darkness” of Commercial Law government, lacking the truth needed to free themselves from a slave status under the Federal United States, even while inhabiting territory foreign to its territorial venue.


PS--- if you want to send this to you mailing lists, best convert all the hyperlinks in the Freeman article to plain text.  Some servers are rejecting articles with embedded hyperlinks. 

Wolves in Sheep's Clothing


By Anna Von Reitz

There is no "Chief Justice Michael R. Hamilton"--- there's just a con man wanted in three states, living in Louisiana now, and doing what he does best: misleading people.
In order to have a "Chief Justice" there must be such an office, it must be available, one must eligible for it, one must earn it, and one must be properly elected to fill it.
Michael R. Hamilton's claim to be "Chief Justice" fails on all counts.
Michael R. Hamilton and those supporting him, including Bruce Doucette, haven't taken the steps to take back their birthright political status as American state nationals, so they can't function as American State Citizens.
They are still United States Citizens and/or "citizens of the United States" pretending to be something they are not, and as their actions suggest, they are wolves in sheep's clothing in other ways, too.
There is one Chief Justice of the Maritime Admiralty court system established by the original Constitution and that post belongs to the delegated authority of the United States. It has nothing to do with the United States of America and the Common Law court system the people of this country are owed.
So there is no such office as "Chief Justice" on our side of the fence.
And if there were, Michael R. Hamilton couldn't fill it, because he would have to be claiming his birthright political status.
He would have to be functioning under 100% commercial liability, too, which means posting a bond with the U.S. Treasury.
He hasn't done that, either.
He would also have to be a State Justice first. He claims that he is serving in the capacity of a State Justice for Louisiana--- but no, I'm sorry, not possible. Irish nationals can't serve as officers of Spanish courts, and US citizens can't serve as officers of any American court in Louisiana, in Texas, in Colorado, or any other state.
None of the actual states allow Dual Citizenship. They never have. They still don't. If you don't give up your U.S.citizenship, you can't fill a position as a Justice or Judge of any state of the Union.
If you don't get to first base, you aren't allowed to go to second.
If you aren't really a State Justice, you can't be a Chief Justice---even if there was such an office on the American side--- and there isn't.
Then there is the matter of how and by whom he was supposedly elected to fill this non-existent office. Three other people who are also pretending to be State Justices without meeting the requirements of the office. one of them being Bruce Doucette, elected him while on a (unsuccessful) mission to secure the release of prisoners in New Mexico.
I wasn't there and would have objected to the entire proposition as nonsense, but apparently, they thought that choosing one of them to act as lead on the case and calling him "Chief Justice" would lend more weight to their position, so they just out of the thin air created such an office and the three of them elected Michael R. Hamilton to fill it.
It's so completely loony, so contrary to what is proper, I don't even know what to say about that. If you think that three people have the right to wave their hands and create a new public office and put it on the payroll, you don't need a new government, you need a psychiatrist.
What disturbs me beyond the dishonor and discredit that these actors have brought to those people who are actually doing the work and filling vacated state offices honorably, is the power-mongering and egotism involved.
Being a Public Servant means just that. In the American system of things, you set aside your sovereign status for the good of your country and you fill a public office and expose yourself to the slings and arrows and requirements of it. It's not a "plum" or a mark of social status and whatever powers that office possesses, are exercised with a constant knowledge of their limits.
Here were have an example of people trying to lord it over us and pretending to have special ranks and powers never granted to them, even creating fancy-sounding new offices for themselves out of thin air.
And what does that sound like, but more of the same crappola we have been struggling with all these years?

Again, I say to all of you--- come away. Don't participate in what they are doing and don't be associated anymore with Bruce Doucette or Michael R. Hamilton or any of those supporting them and condoning this behavior.

-----------------------------
See this article and over 500 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 


Sunday, March 26, 2017

Not Overtaken, Reborn


By Anna Von Reitz

I haven't had an opportunity to review this lengthy psyops report in depth, but it appears to be based on the assumption that because the names have changed and some international forces and new weapons are present, the America we love and know is being lost and overtaken.  In fact, what is being stripped away are the false names and presumptions that were the result of the Great Fraud and illegal occupation beginning in 1861. 

The actual country that we living American people are owed is being returned and the States of America are receiving back all the assets and credit that has been embezzled. Remember that the original constitution is called "The Constitution for the united States of America"----- the name of this country as it pertains to the delegated authority in international jurisdiction was always "States of America".  The "united" was an adjective used to describe "States of America".

This whole situation has become overly complex over time and the lawyers have had a field day confusing everyone and making false claims and practicing personage and barratry.  They've had a really sweet racketeering operation on our shores and they've done it in such a clever way that at the end of the day, they can even attempt to blame it on us and say that they did it all in our best interests. 

I am blowing past all that, as if it doesn't exist, and going to the meat of the matter.  We want our land, we want our homes, we want our money, we want our identities, our copyrights, our trademarks, our patents--- all of it returned.  We want clean, clear, easy means to correct our political status, obtain proper passports, and convert all these "public trusts" back into private bank accounts.  We want remedy on the land, full cure and maintenance on the sea, and redemption in the jurisdiction of the air. 

To do that requires going back to the actual names of things as they were 150 years ago and doing justice to the dead.  Think of all the people who lived and died as slaves since 1861, thinking that they were free men?  Deluded, fooled, defrauded, embezzled, conned by these criminals? 

It's not just a matter of what is due to us, it's what was due to our great-great-grandparents, too. 

There was a plan to kill the Priority Creditors of the con artists, just as they did in Nazi Germany.  We blew that to smithereens in 2014.  There was a plan to declare our Republics "dead", no longer having "international representation" and no longer having a sufficient currency in international circulation.  We blew that sky-high in 2015. At every turn, as the con artists have tried to undermine us, tried to deny our claims, tried to gain the legal edge---- they have been defeated. 

And not just defeated.  Squashed flat.  Exposed.  Like roaches.

There was an attempt by HRM Elizabeth II to claim that she was the Head of State of the United States of America.  Wrong.  The actual Head of State stepped forward.  There was an attempt by FRANCE, that is, Jacob Rothschild, to establish a contract by assumption and succession.  We said, thanks, but no thanks.  In public.  Repeatedly. 

What needs to happen in America and in every other country around the world is a full and honest housecleaning and education of the public so as to enable every man and woman to make decisions---- a sort of planetary Town Hall meeting --- where each one except those who really, truly are disabled and unable to act in their own behalf --- gets to exercise their free will and have access to their own credit without middlemen. 

Anyone who is not in a coma, anyone who is say, sixteen or older, anyone who is mentally competent --- should be truthfully told about the issues and choices, and then allowed to choose for themselves.

Those who are with me believe that when a man or woman is given all the facts, all the pros and cons, the vast majority will choose what is right and good for themselves and for their country and for all mankind.   Take away the lies and fears and tell the truth and at the end of the day---- we are grown up enough and rational enough to choose what is good.

I have often told the story of being lost in a blizzard in the back country of Alaska and seeing a tiny little Quonset hut in the distance, struggling my way to the door, and being welcomed by a very elderly Eskimo living a very simple life on the very edge of nowhere.  When it push comes to shove, when we become aware of how small we are, when we start discerning the real miracles of life--- then all of a sudden the world drops away and what is real and precious becomes painfully apparent.

Nobody has to tell us what is true or what is good.  We all already know.  

It's right there in front of us.  It's been there all the time.  And when we remember who and what we are, it's so easy to be grateful and to choose life and to share, because we finally realize that we are worthy and we are loved and we are blessed and we are immersed in riches beyond compare in great abundance, with more than enough for our needs and wants and wishes, more than enough for every man to have his home in peace. 

The dark night of the Doctrine of Scarcity and the rule of Satan is finally ending.  The Thousand Years of Peace has been declared, and those who are guilty are scattering and stumbling, afraid of what this means and what will be done to them.  It is the Will of our Father, that not one will be lost.  Not a single goat, not a single sheep.  All will be redeemed.  All will be cared for.  All will be taught.  All will be cherished.  And though their sins are as scarlet, they shall be washed white as wool.
Those who are ruining the Earth will be stopped and a new Paradise will be born and it is happening right now. 

The plans of the Enemy are all torn and run amok.  The power of money is nothing compared to the power of Nature and love.  Rejoice. Have faith. You may feel angry about what has been revealed.  You may be afraid.  Other people may be rushing around in a panic.  Some may try to delude you again.  There's ten pounds of ignorance for every pound of knowledge on the street right now.  But what I am telling you is true, and what all the naysayers and fear-mongers are telling you, is not.

And as we should all know by now, when what is true comes, what is false must pass away. 

-----------------------------
See this article and over 500 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.  

FOURTH SUNDAY IN LENT (LAETARE)

The Introit of this day's Mass, which begins with the word Laetare, is as follows:
INTROIT Rejoice, O Jerusalem, and come together all you that love her; rejoice with joy you that have been in sorrow: that you may exult, and be filled from the breasts of your consolation. (Isai: LXVI. 10. 11.) I rejoiced at the things that were said to me: We shall go into the house of the Lord. (Ps. CXXI. 1.) Glory be to the Father, etc.
COLLECT Grant, we beseech Thee, almighty God, that we who justly suffer for our deeds may be relieved by the consolation of Thy grace. Through etc.
EPISTLE (Gat. IV. 22-31.) Brethren, it is written that Abraham had two sons; the one by a bond-woman and the other by a free-woman. But he who was of the bond-woman was born according to the flesh; but he of the free-woman was by promise: which things are said by an allegory. For these are the two testaments. The one from Mount Sina, engendering unto bondage, which is Agar: for Sina is a mountain in Arabia, which hath affinity to that Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But that Jerusalem which is above is free, which is our mother. For it is written: Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not: break forth and cry, thou that travailest not; for many are the children of the desolate, more than of her that hath a husband. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. But as then he that was born according to the flesh persecuted him that was after the spirit, so also it is now. But what saith the scripture? Cast out the bond-woman and her son: for the son of the bond-woman shall not be heir with the son of the free-woman. So, then, brethren, we are not the children of the bond-woman, but of the free: by the freedom wherewith Christ hath made us free.

Reply to Bruce Doucette Concerning the Continental Marshals Service


By Anna Von Reitz

Reply to Bruce Doucette in Regard to the Continental Marshals Service
Just because you say so, doesn't make it so. Unless, of course, we really do believe in the movie, "Bruce Almighty".
Let's get this straight. The Continental Marshals Service was created over 200 years ago by George Washington. It doesn't belong to you or to any single state or small group of states. It belongs to the united States of America.
You and your pals started the move to fill the vacated offices of the Continental Marshals, but you did not create those offices and you have no delegated power to change them, abrogate them, assign them to a new jurisdiction, place them under different administrative management or meddle with them at all. Period.
Just as you have stepped forward and offered to serve your state as a State Justice, these men and women have stepped forward to serve the states (plural) to enforce the undelegated powers owed to the states and people in international jurisdiction.

Continental, Federal, Territorial, and Municipal.....


By Anna Von Reitz

I know this is confusing, but until we all learn this basic information, there will continue to be confusion and chaos and all efforts to organize the lawful government we are owed will be crippled, so please take note and take the time to thoroughly understand the information:

There are actually four versions of "United States" we deal with all the time--- we started out with two and that has grown to four over the past two hundred plus years. 

Friday, March 24, 2017

So, I Am a Vatican Spy?


By Anna Von Reitz

I just got another poke in the ribs from Michael R. Hamilton, a con man pretending to be a Justice in Louisiana. He says that thanks to his propaganda, everyone now thinks I am a Vatican spy.  He was gloating over how easy it was to mislead you. 

Nobody who has read my voluminous correspondence with the Cardinals and Popes for the past thirty years would assume any such thing. 

They wouldn't be ignorant enough to think that "the Vatican" is equivalent to the Holy See, either.  

Be that as it may, as I told Mr. Hamilton who is tracking and secretly stealing data from everyone who visits his website-----

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Please Prevent Wholesale Anti-Semitism


By Anna Von Reitz

Let's draw a line in the sand between "Jews" and the Tribe of Dan.  

Dan was one of the sons of Jacob, and if you read the Bible, you will learn that the Tribe of Dan has a peculiar banner and emblem: the Serpent.  Hence, they are rightfully called "Serpent Seed".  

You will also learn that according to Jacob's blessing, Dan will be a "stumbling block" to the "Rider"----that is, to our reason and good sense. 

Later in the story, the Tribe of Dan "disappears" along with the other "Lost Tribes of Israel".   These tribes weren't really lost in the physical sense.  They were lost in the spiritual sense and fell into worshiping foreign gods. 

Our mission is to restore the lawful government that is owed to us.


By Anna Von Reitz

Our lawful government, sometimes called the "de jure" government, is called the United States of America.  The United States of America has been undermined from within by a commercial corporation calling itself the United States, which is under contract to our states to provide "essential government services".  (See the Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783 and Article IV.) 

The United States is controlled by the Pope and the British Monarch and operated by a Board of Trustees calling itself the United States Congress. 

The United States went rogue during and after the so-called American Civil War and just neglected to tell anyone. 

A Guide to Choosing Your Leaders


By Anna Von Reitz

It is an unfortunate fact that by far the majority of men who assume positions of leadership in any organization are compelled to do so by their own egotistical hunger for coercive power and social recognition and control over others.

Just look at Capitol Hill.

Such men may appear as gentle as doves, yet inside be ravening wolves. They may speak of our Father and drape themselves with religious sentiment.  They may even appear as angels of light.  

Public Notice of Gross Judicial Misconduct


By Anna Von Reitz

This Notice is issued to the Public in regard to the activities of Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton taking place as an unverifiable conference call March 22, 2017 claiming to have authority to alter Public Law, commandeer Public Offices, have ownership rights to the name "Continental Marshals" which has been an office of the lawful government of the united States of America for over 200 years, claims to have authority granted to them to change the nature, duties, authorities, jurisdiction, and chain of command of the Continental Marshals a fiat by an unrecognizable multi-state group merely calling itself a "national assembly" when the only true national assembly is vested in the Continental Congress----let all be made aware that this is an act of gross judicial misconduct amounting to criminal negligence. 

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Public Offices Belong to the Public


By Anna Von Reitz

Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton are attempting to host what they call a "national assembly" call tonight, yet they are once again refusing to obey the Public Law established by the American states and people.
Until they get their heads screwed on and their facts straight, nothing they say has any validity and imposes no obligation on anyone else. And neither do the actions of however many misguided and misinformed and unidentified people tuning into a telephone call.

These two men haven't even bothered to correct their own political status and are still United States Citizens purporting to hold offices in the government of the states of the union.
Hello? Big red flags going up anywhere yet?

Stealing from the Citizenry

How Government Goons Use Civil Asset Forfeiture to Rob Us Blind  By John W. Whitehead  March 20, 2017

"In modern-day America, greedy government goons steal from the innocent to give to the corrupt under court- and legislature-sanctioned schemes called civil asset forfeiture. In fact, according to The Washington Post, “law enforcement took more stuff from people than burglars did.”
This is how the American police state continues to get rich: by stealing from the citizenry. "


https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/stealing_from_the_citizenry_how_government_goons_use_civil_asset_forfeiture

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Was Trump chosen by FREEMASONS ILLUMINATI & JEWS ZIONISTS?

This article is NOT from Anna Von Reitz. Unless you see her picture on an article on this blog, it's not from Anna.

At this point, considering who he has appointed to his cabinet and other positions, I think the answer might be yes.

Found here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ccwWh39P2E

About the Supposedly "Missing" Original 13th Amendment.... A Recap of the Scam


By Anna Von Reitz

It's true that there is another 13th Amendment", but it's not missing and the circumstance is not exactly as people are interpreting it.  They think that there is one Constitution and that the so-called "original 13th Amendment" was ratified and then mysteriously disappeared. 

In fact, there are two different constitutions involved.  The Titles of Nobility Amendment was ratified by the original land jurisdiction states in 1819 and became part of The Constitution for the united States of America. 

It was not included in the look-alike, sound-alike Federal (Territorial) Constitution published in 1868 as the Constitution of the United States of America.  Instead, the 13th Amendment to that document was the one consenting to the abolition of slavery everyone is familiar with.

Monday, March 20, 2017

Mayhem and Misunderstanding in Illinois


By Anna Von Reitz

Illinois lies in the Midwest on the Great Lakes and is politically dominated by the massive Chicago urban center, yet for all the numbers of people in the City of Chicago and Cook County in particular, Cook County remains a county like any other, limited by its own geographic parameters.
This is part of the genius of the American Way.  Cook County may have far more people in it than other counties in Illinois.  It may be wealthier by far.  It may have different problems and different options for solving its problems. At the end of the day, it’s still a county circumscribed and limited by its own borders.
Like every other county in America, it may choose to conduct its day to day business using an incorporated franchise of the United States, Inc. --- or not.  

Sunday, March 19, 2017

THIRD SUNDAY IN LENT - Sunday Prayers for Patriots

Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's Year

The Introit of this day's Mass, which begins with the word Oculi, is the prayer of a soul imploring deliverance from the snares of the devil:
INTROIT My eyes are ever towards the Lord: for he shall pluck my feet out of the snare: look thou upon me, and have mercy on me, for I am alone and poor. To thee, O Lord, have I lifted up my soul: in thee, O my God, I put my trust: let me not be ashamed. (Fs. XXIV.) Glory be to the Father, etc.
COLLECT  We beseech Thee, Almighty God, regard the desires of the humble, and stretch forth the right hand of Thy majesty to be our defence. Through Jesus Christ, our Lord, etc.
EPISTLE (Ephes. V. 1-9.) Brethren, be ye followers of God, as most dear children; and walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath delivered himself for us, an oblation and a sacrifice to God, for an odor of sweetness. But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not so much as be named among you, as becometh saints; nor obscenity, nor foolish talking, nor scurrility, which is to no purpose; but rather giving of thanks: for know ye this, and understand, that no fornicator, nor unclean, nor covetous person, which is a serving of idols, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no man deceive you with vain words; for because of these things cometh the anger of God upon the children of unbelief. Be ye not therefore partakers with them. For you were heretofore darkness; but now light in the Lord. Walk, then, as children of the light: for the fruit of the light is in all goodness, and justice, and truth.
EXPLANATION The apostle requires us to imitate God, as good children imitate their father in well-doing and in well-wishing; besides he declares that all covetousness, fornication, all disgraceful talk and equivocal jokes should be banished from Christian meetings, even that such things should not be so much as mentioned among us; because these vices unfailingly deprive us of heaven. He admonishes us not to let ourselves be deceived by the seducing words of those who seek to make these vices appear small, nothing more than pardonable human weaknesses; those who speak thus are the children of darkness and of the devil, they bring down the wrath of God upon themselves, and all who assent to their words. A Christian, a child of light, that is, of faith, should regard as a sin that which faith and conscience tell him is such, and must live according to their precepts and not by false judgment of the wicked. Should any one seek to lead you away, ask yourself, my Christian soul, whether you would dare appear with such a deed before the judgment-seat of God. Listen to the voice of your conscience, and let it decide, whether that which you are expected to do is good or bad, lawful or unlawful.

150 Years of British Criminality -- The Very Short Version


By Anna Von Reitz

We are Third Party Beneficiaries with respect to the National Trust created in the Preamble and are indemnified in the British system under two Royal Sovereign Seals--- the seal of King George the III with respect to the delegated powers, and the seal of William Belcher with respect to the undelegated powers, otherwise known as the Great Seal of the United States.  William Belcher inherited his sovereignty as a result of the Norman Conquest of Britain and Wales.  Thus, the Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783, calls George III the "prince of the United States" and does not mention who the actual Head of State---the "king" of the United States--- was.  Later generations simply presumed it was the British Monarch, with results disastrous to them and to us.

This split of delegated and undelegated powers held by two sovereigns in international jurisdiction ultimately resulted in the situation we have today, where the delegated powers are held by the British-backed United States and the undelegated powers are held by the "states and people" under the Belcher Seal and operated by the United States of America by default.

About Oaths, Offices, and Civics -- For "Court of Record"......


By Anna Von Reitz

You presume--wrongly, that I designed the oath you took and that I took the same oath.  Not so.  I live in Alaska.  Hello?

The Alaska State Oath is what I took as an oath to serve as an Alaska State Justice, and that is the course I have always recommended to everyone regarding any state court office: take the oath of office required for the land jurisdiction state where you live.  Look it up in the early Session Laws of your state.

How could there be any such thing as a One-Size-Fits-All Oath for all fifty states at the state level? 

Ten Important Facts for Americans


By Anna Von Reitz

Fact One:  The states each retained the right to keep their own "well-regulated militia" as part of the constitutional agreement.  

Fact Two: There is no provision for any state to operate multi-state armed forces of any kind under state authority.

Fact Three: The United States of America operates the undelegated powers of the states and people in international jurisdiction---that is, the union of states operates those powers and offices, not any one state.

Friday, March 17, 2017

Solutions? You Guys Want SOLUTIONS???


By Anna Von Reitz

Solutions? You Guys Want SOLUTIONS? 
Well, how about this?

The court system is messed up because it has been turned into a giant debt collection agency run by the creditors of the Federal Government and its "State of State" franchises. 
The rest of the story is that they are collecting on fraudulent debts--debts that (1) don't exist for the most part and (2) aren't your debts.

Moreover, these courts are being run as quasi-military tribunals in military districts, under the pretense that the "American Civil War" was ever an actual war. 

Thursday, March 16, 2017

Badge Buffoonery -- Tempest in Teapot 2


By Anna Von Reitz

In response to the Company Line being put out by Doucette, Hamilton, et alia. and as expressed by an apparently concerned commentator-----

I would be inclined to put more weight to your reasoning, if I didn't know some simple facts and didn't have experience with Bruce Doucette bungling money and contract relationships before. 

The simple facts I know are these: (1) At this point in its development, there is one check book and one account funding all aspects of the Continental Marshals Service.  There is not some sophisticated, separate account structure, where it is possible to set aside "special designated funds";  (2) Bruce Doucette had cause to know that when he made the donation and he has no reason to suppose any thing different now; (3) Anyone who isn't serious and competent enough to pay $35 for their own badge-- and that is assuming that they pass the vetting process-- shouldn't be considering service as a Continental Marshal; (4) Thanks to the fraud our lawful government has suffered, the Continental Marshals Service isn't yet funded or staffed except by donations and by volunteers. Bella Haywood has worked many hundreds if not thousands of hours without receiving diddly-squat for her expertise and service commitment which has nothing whatsoever to do with nursing; (5) Bruce Doucette handed Marshal Haywood the baton and made her responsible for everything concerning the Marshals Service on a national call in front of God and everyone else present; (6) Marshal Haywood set about the task with courage and commitment and has built the Continental Marshals Service ever since. Bruce abdicated the responsibility and therefore also abdicated the authority; (7) This is not the first time that Bruce Doucette has made assumptions about money and commitments and been wrong-headed about both. 

Your State is Your Nation


By Anna Von Reitz

The latest mixed-up quasi-patriot gobbledygook is that you can change your nationality on your birth certificate (in some states) and that if you claim to be an indigenous "Moor" you can reclaim your status as a landowner.

I have news for everyone, you don't have to tell a lie--- that you are a "Moor" or any follower of "Islam"--- to regain your status as a landowner.

Go down to the Recorders Office and record your land titles in your Christian upper and lower case name and have the Secretary of the Treasury switch your ACCOUNT (UPPER CASE NAME(S)) over to the United States of America, U.S. Treasury. 

Things We DON'T Have to Research AGAIN


By Anna Von Reitz

It has come to my attention that patriotic Americans all over this country are spending time and resources delving into things that have already been delved into and explicitly determined with exactitude and proof.  In the interests of saving a lot of unnecessary effort, I am publishing a list of topics we have firmly and well in hand already.

1. The existence of the original constitution called The Constitution for the united States of America. 
2. The existence of the "original" 13th Amendment, called the Titles of Nobility Amendment.
3. The current status of the Reclamation Acts (still mostly in force).

Incompetence -- and Really Crazy Stuff --on Parade


By Anna Von Reitz

Once again, the honest efforts patriots all over this nation are being undermined and discredited by four or five leaders who are way off center and headed for disgrace and quite possibly jail.

Tonight, on the "Judges and Marshals" call their true colors came out. We heard people pretending to be "State Justices" saying that they don't hold with the Constitution and don't believe in state borders.

It goes to prove what I said last week--- they are representing their own "states of mind" and assuming that their opinions are "law" and that, at the very least, is delusional.