Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Friday, May 25, 2018

No, I Am Not Arrested. Not Charged. Not in Any Trouble at All.


By Anna Von Reitz

Please, people, keep up and be ready and able to tell others the current news and the truth, too?  

If we don't do it ourselves, then it is a given that the mainstream media never will. 

The so-called entity doing business as "The United States of America - Reign of Heaven" is another whackjob group that thinks it can own the country of France by owning a foreign copyright to the name "France, Incorporated".  

If you believe that, too, you need some serious psychological evaluation and help discerning the difference between fact and fiction--- which is a more common malady than we might like to think, but is still in the realm of mental incapacity and not something actionable under any form of law. 

Thus, when this organization merely calling itself "The United States of America - Reign of Heaven" issues a "Warrant" for my arrest, it has the same authority as the Columbus Ohio Ladies' Sewing Circle issuing a warrant for my arrest.  

The only possible danger is that some extremely ignorant people might actually believe that this was a valid warrant and try to arrest me. That could be stupidly unfortunate for all concerned.

So, no, I am not charged with anything, I have not been arrested, and I am not in any trouble. 

Ditto the situation with Bruce Doucette and the Colorado Nine.  The people that I knew and worked with in that group were definitely non-violent, kindly, polite, and not a threat to anyone.  However, as I explained in Article 485 published two years ago on my website www.annavonreitz.com, I split company with them when they went off track. 

I argued with them, I showed them the law and the jurisdictions, but they were led astray by a man named Michael R. Hamilton from Louisiana, and I could not get them back on track.  So, I had no choice but to draw a line and formally and in public sever any relationship with them, which I did, prior to them taking the actions that led to their incarceration and recent sentencing. 

Again, I did nothing wrong and I am not in trouble. I obeyed and honored the Public Law and the jurisdictions set forth under the Constitutions.  I advised them to do the same. They chose otherwise.  I am still here and they are in jail. 
It isn't my fault that they are, and it gives me no joy that I was right. 

Perhaps as more people on both sides of the issues wake up, their sentences can be commuted for lack of jurisdiction (just as they had no jurisdiction to address the District Court, the District Court has little or no excuse for addressing them) or perhaps the President will take pity on their understandable confusion and pardon them.  

I do not assume the headlines to be true or unassailable. A man who can be sentenced to 38 years in prison as a Territorial United States Citizen, can just as easily be let go as a free-born non-citizen state national.  

I have faith that as more people awaken to the realities of our situation and the actual Public Law, many Americans who have been accused of crimes and especially white collar victim-less crimes will be released to the custody of lawfully elected local sheriffs, and those who committed no actual crime against the Public Law will be released. 

Robbery, fraud, murder, rape, and other acts that actually harm other people will always be crimes, but thought crimes, smoking marijuana, spitting on the sidewalk, having a different opinion, and as I saw in the headlines this morning concerning actor Morgan Freeman--- "inappropriate behavior" --- will go right out the window and never stand a chance of being prosecuted as crimes.  

So will many euphemisms and notions of political correctness evaporate in the light of day.  People will have to call death by its name again, and embrace truth and common sense again. The practice of trial by popular opinion will come to its well-deserved end, and all those who have subscribed to these egocentric sophomoric ideas may even come to realize that they have placed themselves in danger by adopting and advocating herd mentality as a way of life. 

Herd animals have an alarming way of showing up on dinner plates, a fact that those who value being popular above being right need to carefully consider. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The Short, Short Version


By Anna Von Reitz

The scags back in the 30's made a false claim against our assets by pretending that we were all Territorial United States Citizens by choice --- that we all "volunteered" into that status in exchange for the "benefits" of Social Security (which we paid for times ten ourselves) and similar such bogus "benefits" like registering our private cars as property belonging to them and available for them to use as collateral for loans, etc., etc., etc.

They did this with our labor and our land --- everything.  And all without telling us. 

It would be like being named as the co-signer on a car loan without ever being told a word about it.  It's an "unconscionable contract" --- literally, because there was no "meeting of the minds" possible.  They just did it, and the greedy banks let them do it. 

It is totally illegal and unlawful and morally bankrupt to boot.  

Okay, so the moment we find out, we can object.  We found out and started objecting immediately.  We went to the Pope. We went to the Queen.  We went to the FBI.  We went to Interpol.  We went to the DOJ.  We went to the UN.  We went to the Inspector Generals.  We went to the Postmasters.  

And they all stood there staring at us like we were Mr. Ed -- but we have the proof and everything we are telling you is playing out as we speak. 

The Historic Trusts are all locked up.  Nobody can get a transaction through to save themselves. 

Why?  Because these yahoos, the Governors of the States of States, like the State of Ohio, went bankrupt while in possession of our purportedly "abandoned estates".  That means that our estates are "presumed to be" property belong to the bankrupt State of Ohio, for example, available for the creditors of the State of Ohio to claim under the rules of maritime commerce. 

Using the car loan analogy, everything went along fine as long as the State of Ohio made its payments.  Nobody was the wiser, really.  

The moment the State of Ohio goes bankrupt, the payments don't get made and the co-signers get dunned.  If the co-signers don't pay, the car then gets repossessed.  

If Trump and Company don't wake up to the game the international bankers are playing, and tell the State of State Governors to release our names and estates Quit Claim and Quiet Title them back to us effective with the day we were born, foreign creditors will own this whole country as a result of this criminal fraud against the American States and people.

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Thursday, May 24, 2018

Comment on Doucette Sentencing


By Anna Von Reitz

This was entirely predictable, because Bruce and Byfield and the others never recognized the history and the split of jurisdictions and would not listen. 

Like so many others, they were so sure of what they thought they knew about this country and the Constitution, they trespassed on the Federales.  Only after the fact did they find that they were themselves classified as Territorial "United States Citizens" dba "citizens of the United States" and that such citizens have never had any guarantees or rights related to any constitution. 

That doesn't mean that the goons in suits are right, anymore than Doucette and Company were right.  There is, for example, no such thing as a "Sovereign Citizen" and their continued use of this oxymoron calls both their sanity and their competence into question. 

What is called for is a widespread understanding of the existence of two entirely different jurisdictions and populaces living here cheek-and-jowl in the same time-space, under completely different sets of rules.  

What is also called for is a final restoration of our lawful government and an end of any false legal claim or presumption that the Reconstruction of the National-Level States of States that were members of the Confederation of States in any way impairs the States that are and were members of the Federation of States. 

When people on both sides of this situation wake up and realize what they have been doing to each other there will be a Great National Day of Mourning and overall head-shaking, wondering how we could all be bamboozled like this, how employees could be misdirected to abuse their employers, and how courts could be used as institutionalized crime syndicates. 

For now, I rate the Federales as equivalent to the British Raj in India, cruel and unreasonable and arrogant all at the same time, awaiting their inevitable demise as a viable political or paramilitary force.  They have clearly heaped blame on Bruce Doucette for actions he neither committed nor encouraged, for the sole purpose of "making an example" of their own unreasoning cruelty and injustice. 

As for the Patriot Community, I hope this has been a Wake Up Call serving to draw their attention to the need to avoid trespassing into foreign jurisdictions.  We are owed our peace and The Law of Peace, AR 27-161-1, but in order to claim it and enforce it internationally and to safely pursue the restoration of our complete and fully functioning lawful government, we cannot go around half-cocked and angry. 

We have our rights and duties and the Federales have theirs. The sooner everyone wakes up and appreciates that fact, the better. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

About the Current Monetary System and Situation....


By Anna Von Reitz

The first really urgent and wonderful presentation I want to recommend on YouTube  is Kenneth Storey's  "The Global Reset Begins"  Youtube presentation.  It is the quickest, simplest, most comprehensive down-to-Earth explanation of the whole banking reform and "reset" situation I have ever run across:  


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7QMMqyEl_I

It's just over an hour long and connects all the dots so that anyone can understand what is going on. 

The other entire series about money and the monetary system we have been living with is Mike Maloney's "Hidden Secrets of Money" also on YouTube. 

Of all the subjects that we are never taught anything about, this is The Biggee. 
When you stop and consider the impact that money or lack of money makes on our individual lives, isn't it about time you "invested" in knowing what money is and what kinds of money there are, and how money works --- or fails to work?  

Let me clue you in, you need to know.  

This series has a lot of segments and packs in a lot of information and a lot of that information is counter-intuitive to what people assume about money and the monetary system.  Don't expect that you are going to get it all the first time around and be prepared to spend several hours over the course of a week or two. But when you are done and you have chewed it all down, you will have an education worth more than gold (and other mediums of exchange).  

See all the videos in Hidden Secrets of Money here:

https://goldsilver.com/hidden-secrets/  Just scroll sideways and start with episode 1.

Another Great Project Doomed to Failure


By Anna Von Reitz

This has been a weary, nasty week for me and my cohorts at The Living Law Firm because innocent people continue to fall into the traps and snares that have been set for them by their own employees, using their own resources against them. 

This situation is so deplorable, so inexcusable, so criminal that it can only be described as diabolical, and it has prevailed on the basis of corrupted commercial law and unpunished criminality disrespecting the public law for decades. 

Today, I got a message about another great effort to "restore America".  Here it is: 


And, so far as my information on the original Constitution debated in 1787 goes, these people are spot on.  They are absolutely right about Mr. Otis and his pen and the results of Lincoln's crime rampage. 

However, now that we come to correcting it, the plot thickens and hope grows dim. 

Why?  

Because just like the NLA, just like the Colorado Nine, just like so many other efforts over the years, the Good Folk at Our First Right Now have not taken in the necessity of correcting their own deliberately obscured and misrepresented political status.  They have also not realized the necessity of assembling their actual States and the "Missing" National-Level States of States in order to enact a proper Amendment. 

They aren't even catching on to the fact that the "constitution" published by the vermin in 1868 is not the same constitution published in 1789.  

The situation is like thinking you are a Frenchman amending the French Constitution, but you've been misidentified as a Spaniard, and also unbeknownst to you, you are trying to amend the Danish Constitution.  

That's how !#%$!@#! up this whole situation really is, after a 150 years of Breach of Trust.  

And we can't straighten it out until we straighten out our own political status records and realize that the 1868 "constitution" has nothing to do with us and our States of the Union.  It was merely a deceptive attempt by a commercial corporation to enclose the actual constitution and usurp upon it in Breach of Trust.  So correcting that or giving it any authority by assumption only makes matters worse and wastes precious time and money.  

Everyone who is working on these "doomed by definition" efforts needs to get clued in and put their effort toward what really needs to be done FIRST and get the horse in front of the cart.  

And that is, our National Assembly, being headed up by the Michigan General Jural Assembly.   The actual States have been called to assemble.  That means organizing county and state jural assemblies throughout this country.  It's a mammoth undertaking and nobody can do it but us. 

Please go to www.national-assembly.net and see where the actual push has to come to shove.  You are needed more than ever now.  Nobody said it would be easy or simple, but it is within our power to crack the real nut that needs to be cracked and emerge victorious.  

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Ditto, Ditto to "Virgo Triad"


By Anna Von Reitz

Ditto, Ditto to "Virgo Triad"
Well, it's apparent that "Tim White" is a liar who doesn't have an honorable bone in his body, or when proven wrong, he would retract and apologize for his false bombast.
And it is also apparent that "Virgo Triad" aka "Kim Goguen" is of the same ilk.
Unfortunately, as I pointed out, they have an infinite number of aliases to hide behind, so it is up to each one of you to discern the truth---- and who is telling you the truth, too.
In this present time, it's easy to see that I separated from Bruce Doucette and the others prior to them being arrested for cause and that they did not follow my advice --- which led to this deplorable situation.
It's also easy to see what I said about April LeJeune and her TDA packages from other posts that have appeared on my website.
So the proof that I am telling the truth and that they are lying is pretty obvious, cut and dried --- this time around. But what if it wasn't so easy for me to point out the truth, with a verifiable public record to back it up?
Would you be swayed by what these known liars say? Probably not.
What if these same known liars were to dream up some other names for themselves ---- like "Jeremy Black" instead of "Tim White" or "Jupiter Duo" instead of "Virgo Triad"?
You wouldn't recognize the Bad Source and might take them seriously, right?
So you have to school yourselves --- first of all, by knowing by past experience that I am a reliable source to the extent that a human can be, and second of all, by learning to recognize trolls and deceivers.
These people never really identify themselves, who they are, where they come from. There's always some excuse -- it's for their safety, it's to protect their family, it's because they have a big pimple on their snout and they are embarrassed to be be seen. It's always something.
They never show their faces, never take the risks that telling the truth requires. And, as a result, they never take responsibility for what they are saying, either. They just "snark and run" like nasty little kids on the playground.
But at least here on this FB page you know exactly who I am and where I come from and who is responsible for what she says, good and bad. So in future, when assailed with a bunch of crappola coming from such "sources" --- ask yourself seriously--- why you would even listen to them?
They are unknown and irresponsible by definition.
What else do you need to know?

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The Eighth Covenant Decree


By Anna Von Reitz

I am publishing something that is going to sound and look very strange to people. 

It is a Decree, like a Divorce Decree or any other, except for a few special differences. 

The letters of the Decree are white on a black background, the exact opposite of the black on white we are used to, because this is a Mercy Decree, not a Judgment. 

It is issued by The United States of America Republic and The Republic of the United States of America, jointly, using a General Delivery address, acting to communicate of, for, and by the people. 

It uses the ancient language of Parse translated into English and styled for use on the land jurisdiction by private parties. This is as close to a universal language as is now possible. 

The Decree observes that mistakes have been made. Out of seven covenants with the Divine, men have managed to break all seven, one for every deadly sin, and for this we deserve destruction.  However, there is an eighth covenant, and that covenant still stands. 

The Eighth Covenant declares mercy to Mankind, despite all mistakes and failings.  It is established on the Earth as a bulwark against Evil and as salvation for Mankind.  

The Decree which will be posted as a separate item on my website invokes the Eighth Covenant and its Power upon the Earth. It's light comes out of the darkness. It's words are bound by the Word. May the glory of Our Father in us shine forth in the darkness. 

The Mercy Decree is binding Law of Heaven and cannot be repealed.  Those who have condemned the Earth and condemned the people and condemned this country to endure their lies and atrocities are in for the biggest surprise ever. 


The United States of America Republic:
The Republic of the United States of America:
Of the people, for the people, by the people:
General Delivery:
Big-Lake:Alaska:
The United States of America

Decree:
Of the Mistakes by Man
Of the Seven Covenants by the Seven Sins
Destroyed;
Of the Covenants the Covenant of the Word : Iaeous stands.
For now-and-only-now-is-forever
By breath, by water, by blood, by spirit:
Peace-be-to-you
Love-be-with-you
All-sins-fore-given. All-trespasses-mended. All-debts-paid.
All of the Covenants be for and as One-Covenant : Iaeous.
Of the Word, by the Word, for the Word
By: James-Clinton-Belcher:Special-Grand-Justice
By: Anna-Maria-Riezinger:Special-Grand-Justice
By: Harold-Carl-Heinze:Special-Grand-Justice

Wednesday, May 23, 2018

Links to Neo's call recording

----- Original Message -----
From: Neo The One
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 2:10 PM
Subject: LINKS TO CALL

Hi Paul

Here are the links there are two (2) for the edited call:



Here is the link for my website:  http://weexitthematrix.wordpress.com/

last here is my email address:  iamtheone@protonmail.com

Thank you for all you are doing

Neo

"Tim White" With Egg All Over His Face ---and More


By Anna Von Reitz

Today I got a very ugly email from "Tim White" whoever he really is, loudly announcing that Bruce Doucette has been sentenced to 38 years in Federal Prison ---and accusing me for being at fault for this and purportedly misleading Bruce.

Here's the truth published on my website, www.annavonreitz.com two years ago:

Article # 485

"The End of My Association with Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton"


In this article I fully explain the argument with Bruce and Byfeldt and Michael R. Hamilton, why I parted company with them, and all that I explained to them in my attempt to keep them in their own jurisdiction and out of trouble.

So now, they have reaped the whirlwind, and people like "Tim White" are out beating their chests -- though it isn't clear that "Tim White" ever actually knew Bruce or Michael R. or Stephen -- or now has any cause to grieve as I do.

I actually knew these men. 

I never cared for Hamilton.  I had seen his kind before, usually Federal con men sent in to mislead patriots.  He was loud and brassy and opinionated and all pumped up and God forbid, he'd never listen to a woman about anything.

His first goal was to subvert The Continental Marshals Service and turn it into some kind of improper replacement for the state militias.  I opposed him, successfully, on that. 

He turned right around and started beating the drum about the "power of the Grand Jury" and how the Grand Jury had the right and ability to -- according to him anyway--- do whatever it wanted to do. 

In vain, I pointed out that no, a Grand Jury has to address its own jurisdiction.

Why Bruce and Byfeldt and the others listened to Michael R. Hamilton -- a man with no training in law -- and ignored me, is something I don't pretend to understand.  It made no sense then and makes no sense now.

Just like "Tim White's" attacks make no sense.

My opinion?  Tim White is yet another Federal Agent Stool Pidgeon "Sleeper" and Propagandist just like Michael R. Hamilton.  Another Pied Piper.  Another traitor sent in to spread disinformation and cause trouble and split the movement to finish the "Reconstruction".

When I brought the truth to his attention and sent him a copy of the Article noted above, his response was to taunt me for accusing him of libel and slander and demanding a retraction and apology for his screed.

This is a man who doesn't care about the truth --- a willful liar.

Unfortunately, he has just dirtied the name "Tim White" but has an infinite variety of other names to choose from.  And photographs, too.  For all I know -- or you know --- "Tim White" might be "Michael R. Hamilton". 

People really do need to wise up.  There are patriots who are just plain wrong, however well-intentioned they may be, but there are also Federal Agents, disguised as patriots --- and these are the ones typically talking the loudest and urging violent actions and preaching incorrect legal theories. 

Why would any American betray other Americans to a 38 year stint in Federal Prison?  Often it is the result of a plea bargain.  Someone gets into trouble with the Federales in their own right, and as part of the plea bargain, they agree to do an undercover assignment as a snitch. 

Or they may be old line Tories, aligned with Britain and the European Bankers from the get-go, like Alexander Hamilton.  Maybe it's no coincidence that the guilty party in this story is named Michael R. Hamilton?  You'd be surprised how long such affiliations last, especially when these same people continue to get money and benefits and privileges in return for their loyalty to the System.

For me, these extremely punitive sentences against Doucette and Byfeldt show the evil and ugly and violent nature of the "American Raj" decamped on our shores. 

These men did nothing whatsoever to deserve any such sentence. They did nothing violent.  They owed no actual allegiance that was betrayed. They just got confused and trespassed on federated State of State jurisdiction, something for which they should have surely been forgiven, considering the lengths that that same State of State organization has gone to, to obscure its true nature and identity.

This whole situation is also a matter of personal grief, as it was two years ago when I parted ways with Bruce.  He was a good and gentle and generous man who wanted to do good things for this country, like so many others who have made similar mistakes, and suffered similar consequences.  During our last conversation I shouted myself hoarse -- and I almost never shout -- trying to get through to him.  He wouldn't listen.  The next day I sat down and wrote the article above. 

I already knew what would happen and why, but there was nothing more I could do.  You can lead a horse to water, and offer correct information and insight--- but.....

Stephen Byfeldt is one of the greatest constitutional scholars I have ever known. He knows his constitution by heart, backwards and forwards. He has studied it from early on.  He knows its guarantees.  He was prepared to stand on it to the death. 

What he could not conceive was that the court he would be facing would not be a constitutional court.  What he couldn't believe is that he was mis-identified as a Territorial United States Citizen, dba "citizen"----and that such citizens have never had any rights or guarantees under any federal Constitution. 

I told them all of this, in fact, I told them a great deal more, but they were so deeply indoctrinated into what they thought they knew for sure about this country and its government that they didn't believe me. 

Now, sadly, they know.

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Masters of Deceit


By Anna Von Reitz


Rod is behind --- as in not caught up --- with me in some areas, but, he is ahead of us in some areas of investigation, too, and he has taken on some of the toughest interfaces to investigate. Who else do you know who has taken the issue of gun rights down the throat of the Municipal Government?  Hmm?   I admire him for that and for his dogged strength and determination to get to the bottom of the particular "piles" he has chosen to work on.  I need about a million others just like him taking up their part of the work and chewing on their part of the Elephant in the Middle of the Room.  

Remember always that these people we are dealing with specialize in telling half-truths and misrepresentations and distractions.  They have bags of tricks that they use to discredit people and confuse issues.  They are professionals at this -- some could even be called "artists of deception".  They come along behind people like me and Rod and Deborah and William Cooper and Jean Keating and they do everything possible to discredit what we are saying because when the American people wake up and start really looking into the dark corners --- their whole hegemony and gravy train will come to a screeching halt.  There's a good movie about this called "The Masters of Deceit" and although it focuses more on product campaigns and lobbyist activities, it shows you how these vermin operate. 

They have something to GAIN by trying to discredit people like me and Rod and Deborah, but what do we have to gain by telling you what we have dug out of public records and earned by hard experience?   Nothing at all.  We may be wrong or right about our interpretations, but the point that we've found it in the public record or experienced it directly, should be a clue to the rest of humanity that yes, indeed, something is wrong and not only in Denmark.  

When I first started this, people wanted me to "prove" everything to them, but I am not so green and foolish as all that.  Nobody ever proves anything to anyone else.  People have to be curious enough to look and learn for themselves and in effect, use their own reasoning and things the that they directly see and observe for themselves before they know the truth and therefore own the truth and prove it to themselves.  So keep and open mind and open ears and keep your Shinola Sensors turned on "High" and sift and winnow everything to discern the truth for yourself.  I think that when you do, you will realize that a lot of what you are hearing that initially sounds "far fetched" or "incredible" will fall neatly into a pattern verified by history and public records that can't be denied. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Postal Fraud and Breach of Trust


By Anna Von Reitz

One of the most frustrating parts of the current situation is that Americans continue to respect and trust the very people that have betrayed them.  

This is what makes "breach of trust" such a difficult and reprehensible crime --- difficult in that the victims often resist those who are trying to help them and deny that their beloved "Trustees" would ever cheat or harm them, and reprehensible in that the guilty parties have knowingly traded upon this trust placed in them and in the positions of power entrusted to them to implement the crime. 

If the members of Congress had done their actual jobs, if former Presidents had acted with Honor, none of the evils infesting our monetary and political and court systems would exist.  And we, ourselves, had we done our job and been less trusting and more vigilant--- this situation wouldn't exist, either.  

One of those who has done his best to truly represent the people who placed their trust in him, New Hampshire Representative Richard Marple, has recently raised the issue of postal fraud and the misuse and abuse of the postal service to deliver bogus court documents and bills--essentially promoting a scam-- so a group of us have been discussing and I share my comments below: 
______________________

It IS both grammar fraud-- they know that when they address anything to RICHARD MARPLE they are addressing a public trust that they set up and named after you without your knowledge or consent-- and postal fraud. 

The use of all capital letters is known as "DOG LATIN".  In this country it has been used as "American Sign Language." 
If you look it up in Black's Fourth or in the Chicago Manual of Style you will get an eye-full.  Friends in Australia have tracked its use and misuse all the way back to the Emperor Justinian.  They have an entire Wordpress site dedicated to the subject-- The Justinian Deception.  It is very well documented. 

So when they create a public trust named after you without your knowledge or consent they are creating an "unconscionable" contract.  You are literally not conscious of any of this. 

Right out of the box any such contract in any jurisdiction of the law is null and void the moment you object to it, but how are you going to object if you don't know that any such THING exists? 

The one contract that you can't break is the one you are not aware of. 

They know the scam they have set up, but you don't.  So they send you mail addressed to their PUBLIC TRUST as if you were the Trustee responsible for this, and you mistakenly think it is addressed to you and answer the summons or whatever else without objection so--- gotcha!  They shirk off their responsibility for their creation and hang it around your neck instead. 

Now, they are committing fraud against average Americans when they set up this whole system and start using a foreign language--DOG LATIN -- to secretively mis-address us.  They are committing mail fraud by sending their solicitations through the mail to us "as if" we were the Trustees responsible for IT.  

And the only way they get away with this is by pretending that this is all "voluntary" and we are knowingly and willingly allowing them to do this. 

It is criminal and may not be excused in terms of private contracts.  An illegal private contract is still illegal.  Slavery and involuntary servitude have both been outlawed worldwide since 1926.   Any contract voluntary of involuntary yielding that result is also null and void.  

But we have to object to being bonded and we have to object to any presumption of Trusteeship related to IT and we have to object to the Mail fraud and so on---and how are The People going to do that if (1) they don't know this ugly foreign system exists and (2) they don't know they have been targeted and included in this foreign system by these scam artists and (3) they trust and respect the vermin doing this to them and think you are a crackpot when you try to warn them? 
__________________________

A Purgatory Oath is an Ecclesiastical/Canon Law Oath that has no place in a Commercial Court.  Just like Writs don't work in a Commercial or Administrative Court. 

You have three different systems -- air, land, and sea --- and they all have different conventions --- different means of expression, different forms to fill out, different courts to invoke.  

A lot of the confusion in the courts comes about because people think they are in one kind of court when in fact they are in another kind of court.  It is necessary to nail them down as to what the declared and actual jurisdiction of the court is before you make ANY reply to them at all, and once they commit to a jurisdiction you have to watch them to make sure they stay in that jurisdiction.  If, after declaring jurisdiction, the judge makes an excuse and gets up and leaves the room and then comes back in, you have to repeat the demand for him to declare the actual jurisdiction of the court again.  They use this as a trick to switch jurisdictions when the court appears to be in continuous session. 

All these courts that the Bar Attorney (shipping clerks) operate are commercial courts and the Judges won't budge from that jurisdiction absent action on your part forcing them to move from Maritime to Admiralty to Ecclesiastical jurisdiction.  Maritime deals with trusts and contracts that are implied, Admiralty deals with actual factual contracts and trusts that are written and present as evidence, Ecclesiastical Courts deal with moral issues and contracts we have with God ---- and no judge wants to enter there. 

Maritime is the easiest jurisdiction for these yahoos to fudge around in, so that is where they dearly like to stay.  In Admiralty they have to hear the facts, which are often detrimental to the Court's advantage.  In Ecclesiastical Law the Judge is put at risk and anything up to and including his life can be forfeit, so they avoid going into the realm unless they are utterly desperate and have no choice. 

And the moment you enter upon the land and soil jurisdiction of this country they have to vacate -- simply dismiss and run --- because they have no jurisdiction related to the land and soil at all and are obligated to obey the Law of the Land while on our shores, and they have often abundantly violated the Law of the Land, so best not to even discuss it from their standpoint. 

I have had so many of these courts return fees, release bonds and dismiss charges by now that this is set in cement and completely reliable and predictable.  They will not engage any issue on the land and soil jurisdiction nor can they operate any Court in the land and soil jurisdiction, because the Territorial United States has no such jurisdiction delegated to it.  

They can only succeed in their objective -- which is to traffick you into their jurisdiction and fleece you -- if you let them, which means you have to learn how to effectively shut them down and recognize all the tricks they use to weasel you into admitting, accepting, submitting, etc.

____________________________

Along with re-affirming the land and soil jurisdiction courts owed to this country and populating those courts with properly trained Counselors-at-Law, and properly informed Jury Pools that are aware of and ready to use their nullification powers, we have to re-educate and discipline the Territorial Courts and the members of the Bar Associations. 

They do have a job to perform, but unfortunately, they have been usurping and presuming upon the American people and their assets, and have been subjecting millions of innocent people to unconscionable contracts under color of law. 

This has to stop and right about now.  It is nothing more or less than a venal international crime spree and if it means confiscating pensions, arresting judges, outlawing the Bar Associations on our shores --- whatever it takes, must be done.

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

Monday, May 21, 2018

I Double-Dog Dare the [Territorial] United States Supreme Court


By Anna Von Reitz

Let's begin this discussion with this realization: you can be a king in one country and a slave in another. 

Is that clear enough? 

Is it also clear that different countries operate under different laws? 

Good. 

The United States is and has always been a different country with respect to the Territorial United States.  They function under two separate systems of law. 

This leads to a situation where the States (members of The United States land jurisdiction Union) function under a different system than the Territorial States of States (international jurisdiction of the sea). 

We have lawyers who are Counselors at Law and Justices (of the Peace) who administer the Public Law, which in a State is known as the General Session Law, even if the "State" is being represented as a Public Trust, and the Public Law generally, known as the Law of the Land. 

They have Attorneys at Law and Judges who administer the Private Law, which in a State of State is known as the Statutory Law.  Strictly speaking, only State of State officials, employees and dependents -- all known as "residents" of the State of Alaska (for example) are required to obey the Statutory Law. 

So you have Counselors at Law and you have Attorneys at Law.  I am a Counselor at Law. 

If you occupy an office of the soil or land jurisdiction courts you must be a Counselor at Law and CANNOT be a Bar Attorney.  Period. So there is no basis whatsoever for anyone supposing that I would be or even could be a Bar Attorney.  

It is totally ignorant to look for me among the members of the Bar Association.  They can't operate a State Court and I can't operate a State of State Court BY DEFINITION.  

So, no, I am NOT a member of the Bar, am not required to be a member of the Bar, and could not operate a land or soil jurisdiction court as a member of the Bar. 

Bar Attorneys can act as administrators but can't sit on the bench or otherwise operate in any public capacity in a State Court. 

People have become so ignorant that they don't know the difference between the "Alaska State Court" and the "State of Alaska Court". 

Nor do they know the difference between a Counselor at Law (required to run land and soil jurisdiction courts) and Attorneys at Law (required to run Maritime and Admiralty jurisdiction courts). 

Obviously, I know what I am doing, the rules of the Office I am occupying, and the State I serve; just as obviously, I am not serving in nor have I ever claimed to serve in any of the capacities you mention.

And again, there is no factual controversy about this whatsoever. 
There are land courts and there are sea courts and this is the way it has always been. 

All that has happened is that as more and more Americans have been unknowingly press-ganged into the international jurisdiction of the sea, they have unwittingly subjected themselves to the sea courts and the land courts have become rare as hen's teeth as a result. 

That does not mean that my court does not exist-- it is clearly established under the General Session Laws of Alaska.  Nor does it mean I am doing anything wrong or making any false claims.  I am not impersonating a judge of any sea jurisdiction court or claiming to be a Bar Member or any other such ignorant meandering.  

I am here serving my State-- not any "State of State".  

And I am serving the honest Tradesmen engaged in private international trade and the living people who have rejected FDR's unconscionable New Deal contract and who have returned to the land and soil of Alaska. 

And I Double-Dog Dare any member of the (Territorial) United States Supreme Court to say otherwise. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Again, So Everyone "Gets" It


By Anna Von Reitz

Again-- the power structure in this country is supposed to run like this:

People > Republics > Counties > States > The United States > The United States of America / Federal United States dba "United States" > Territorial United States dba "United States of America"  > Municipal United States dba Municipality of Washington, DC

You will notice that in your lifetime there is only fleeting mention of the Republics and that the Federal United States has been confused both with The United States and with incorporated businesses doing business as the "UNITED STATES" and the Territorial United States has been confused both with The United States of America and with incorporated businesses doing business as the "United States of America". 

All this confusion about who is who and what is what is being used to promote fraud of all kinds against the people and actual States.  Certain parties have gotten very rich from orchestrating this confusion and all these "similar names deceits" ---- and they don't want to give it up.  They have also exercised coercive and war-making powers that they have no right to exercise.  They don't want to give that up, either. 

The fact remains that they are criminals for promoting, aiding, abetting, assisting, or profiting from this circumstance, and anyone who knows what is going on who doesn't take immediate action to stop it, is either an active or passive accomplice to international crime of a most heinous nature. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

As Part of the Ongoing Effort


By Anna Von Reitz

The article re-posted below will help you understand why Rod Class's Administrative Rulings matter.  The short answer is that  the State of North Carolina admitted that the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA is a private subcontractor, and that the State of North Carolina had no direct administrative control over the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and its employees. [Direct administrative control is the responsibility of the parent corporation, dba UNITED STATES and the US Bankruptcy Trustees.]

If you have been following the history, you already know why this is so. 

The Territorial United States franchise doing business as "the State of North Carolina" was bankrupted in 1933.  In 1946, it was still "incompetent" due to bankruptcy and the Bankruptcy Trustees appointed a Municipal United States Corporation, the UNITED STATES, INC., and its franchise doing business as the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, to take over the job of providing "essential government services". 

Joe Average in North Carolina didn't notice or care.  What difference did it make to him who swept the streets and wrote traffic tickets?  It was the same way throughout the country.  People were given no disclosure about any of these arrangements made "for" them. 

But as we shall see, private incorporated subcontractors are not subject to the same rules as public institutions--- and that gives rise to both the situation confirmed by Rod Class's efforts, and the situation described below by one angry attorney: 

DUN & BRADSTREET: 'RATING SERVICE' FOR ALL CORPORATE ENTITIES'

There are a few more things worth noting regarding the DUN & BRADSTREET listing service: D-B is a financial rating service for both ‘public’ and ‘private’ corporations. Utilities and municipal bond ratings would come under D-B preview for certain. It just really never occurred to me years ago when doing litigation discovery, research and analysis, and ‘structured settlements’ that there was seemingly anything incoherent with that fact that municipal and utility bonds are integral to D-B rating services. 

I never ever stopped to think about or scrutinize that fact, let alone allow my deliberation and research skills to ‘wander’ or ‘wonder’ into research that would have disclosed what we recently found. Part of the ease of discovering the complex web of inter-related inter-locking CORPORATIONS had to do with ease of electronic research over the internet. Years ago, if one wanted to search anything within any of the rating services, including “Moody’s”, Standard & Poors, and Dun & Bradstreet, + others, one would have to either have to be a subscriber to the service in order to manually expedite their search-rating results, or, one would have to pay a fee and cause a search to arise. 

D & B ‘ratings’ are affected every time a ‘public hazard bond’, or ‘surety performance bond’, or ‘indemnity bond’ is complained against. An ‘administrative complaint’ is usually all that it takes to cause a ‘tag’ or book entry to be made on any particular bond. Any particular bond, once complained against three or more times, causes a change in underwriting bond ‘risk’. For bonded Bar attorneys, who in many cases may also be appointed, commissioned, or elected to ‘public office’ as ‘Judge’, ‘Clerk of Court’, etc. when/if their bond is complained against for good and reasonable cause, their bond may be ‘pulled’, and due to loss of effective bond or ‘suretyship’, they cannot ‘practice’ or ‘discharge’ the duty of the office held, or occupied. 

In short, the bond maker-issuer is the bonding party for the benefit or on behalf of the ‘bondee’, ie. the purported ‘public officer’, ‘employee’, or ‘official’. This would extend as well to all other ‘public employees’ and ‘agents’-‘agencies’, etc. Every ‘person’ being bonded has a Dun & Bradstreet ‘bond rating’. At least it is reasonable to assume such. 

Once three complaints are filed against any bond, assuming they are with merit and well supported by fact and ‘law’ of the ‘breach’ of fiduciary duty, the bond is most always pulled or revoked. The ‘servant’ at ‘risk’ by assuming the responsibilities of operating in any ‘official capacity’ or by ‘employment’, can no longer be underwritten as a ‘no risk’ or ‘low risk’ contract. 

One incident of ‘breach’ or operating ‘ultra vires’, or ‘without the law’, causes the ‘immunity’ provisions of the written ‘law’ to cease to be effective, because when one violates the law as a ‘public servant’, one’s immunity blanket ceases to apply, thereby leaving the insurer or bondsman or bond issuer exposed to the liability arising from the servant’s acts, which under any ‘breach of law authority’ causes or gives rise to an ‘injury’ which is a civil or criminal commercial liability. 

Everything, whether civil or criminal or martial, is a matter of ‘commerce’, and admiralty law is the venue and jurisdiction by which disputes in/of commercial nature are resolved in truth and fact. 

All writings of the United States of America and of the UNITED STATES, or any other ‘government unit’ are forms of making an ‘offer to contract’. There is no written matter of material fact or issue of fact that is ‘law’ which is not bonded. There is no ‘office’ or function of ‘civil service’ or ‘public’ function that is not bonded. If the bond is not in existence, the bondee is ‘exposed’ and without ‘coverage’ by any ‘surety’. 

Therefore, there is no ‘guarantor’ behind the agent, officer, official, or employee having ‘exposure’, by ‘assumption of risk’, of a material breach or injury in fact by the bondee [person being bonded or insured]. This leaves the person under taint or cloud of operating ‘in the public interest’ without the constitutionally and statutorily required bond, and therefore, in tacit violation of the constitutions and statutes under the scheme of ‘law’. 

“Law” applies first and foremost to government, its employees, officers, and agents. In today’s rogue ‘doctrine of necessity’ ‘de facto’ environment, research has proven and documented that no person, performing as an ‘officer of the court’, being an alleged ‘judge’, being a ‘Bar attorney’ of the ABA or the Federal or State Bars, has a bona fide Constitutional Oath. 

The Bond that is supposed to be in existence sits atop the Oath. The Oath is not merely ‘incidental’ to the ‘office’ as has been ruled in some States by their corrupt court “officers”. The Oath is what imparts lawful and legal authority to the man/woman coming into ‘holding’ a ‘public office’ and becoming a ‘public official’. A public servant having no proper Oath cannot have a proper Bond to encompass or include those risks associated with the ‘office’, ‘discharge of fiduciary duty’ of the office, and the various levels or elements of ‘law authority’ underlying the office. 

Hence, one may take an Oath to any office of the incorporated State, or the UNITED STATES, and not take a preceding Oath to the unincorporated de jure state or United States of America, and operate non/un constitutionally, which is all that has been going on for years, but which was not known or Law-Lawyer tells of truth about oaths and bonds.doc Page 2 of 3 11 April 2008 understood as being a material breach to the People of the State/state, causing or giving rise to material injuries in fact as a consequence of operating ‘ultra vires’, ie. outside the corporate charters and ‘trust indentures’ which create the office in the first place. 

In the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, not one judge has taken the necessary Oaths of office, which include the organic ‘state’ de jure republic oath for “North Carolina”, and the subsequent and inferior or ‘lesser’ oath for the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. The latter ‘public entity’ has federal character, a Federal Employer Identification Number, a Federal Tax Identification Number, and is a federal ‘instrumentality’ of the CORPORATE ‘UNITED STATES’, and the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, under definition of 28 U.S.C. §3002(15), AND 26 U.S.C. §§7701 (a)(9) and (10). This documented fact pertains to every judge in every State court, but also applies to most every other ‘public official’ or ‘law enforcement officer’. 

I cannot address what other State public pretenders and ‘District Attorneys’ or “Prosecutors” do when bringing a criminal complaint against any “natural person”, which includes CORPORATIONS [YES, they are both the class of ‘person’ under statute ‘law’ definition], but in the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, when it is the bringer of the action, the People of the State are never brought in as ‘party to the action’. Only the CORPORATION name is found on the Criminal Complaint or Information form. Only the corporate State is present in the courtroom, trying a case before a CORPORATE JUDGE. 

There exists a complete breach and break from the Constitution of North Carolina, because the People of the republic North Carolina and their ‘law’ are not present in the action nor party to it. They are not in the courtroom, nor are they acting through any ‘officer’ of the People, as ‘District Attorney’, which Office alleges to be a ‘servant of the People’. It is NOT. Even the DA does not have the mandatory and proper Constitutional Oath as condition precedent under NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTES, which clearly state at Chapter 11, Section 11, there shall be two Constitutional Oaths taken. 

Absent performance according to that bonded STATUTE regarding bonded Oaths, leaves a clear and certain risk liability issue for the Bond maker-issuer. Some bonding agent has bonded the Statutes and other writings of the law of the State. Some bond issuer has bonded State ‘employees’, ‘officers’, and ‘public officials’. Some bond issuer has, therefore, “underwritten” risk on the basis of having full knowledge that there exist no Constitutional Oaths beneath the CORPORATE OATH. 

One cannot but presume that the bond issuer-maker has full disclosure; after all, ‘they’ have been registered within each State Department of Corporations, do business in all ‘States’ and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and are presumed to know the “LAW”….including the “law of the land”, which under their “UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE” and all secondary ‘Civil’ or ‘Criminal’ Codes, would find itself to be in harmony with their legislative jurisdictional ‘statutes and implementing regulations’ at U.C.C. 1-308, 1-207, and 1- 103, wherein All Rights are Reserved, and the U.C.C. states that it is harmonious with ‘all jurisdictions’, which would include the jurisdiction of the “law of the land”, ‘common law’, and the various common law Constitutions of the underlying several de jure republic ‘states’ of the American union, aka, United States of America. 

Why would any bond underwriter knowingly underwrite these CORPORATE STATES, UNITED STATES, all of their ‘sub-corporations’, agents-agencies, instrumentalities, and their ‘law authority’ found in their various ‘writings’, private ‘laws’ etc., to operate a ‘public’ or ‘municipal’ construct as if it were ‘lawful government’, but knowing that it really is not?  [Answer: they have named us-- our private ESTATES as the sureties of their bonds, so in order to get relief or restitution for their evil deeds, we have to injure ourselves.]

The underwriters of bonds, therefore, could not allege any defense against a massive intake of related claims by private inhabitants of any of the States or UNITED STATES who have been “compelled” under duress, extreme duress, or risk of extreme duress and prejudice of ‘seizure’, ‘confiscation’ ‘impound’, ‘occupation’, ‘detainment’, or injury or termination by any means of potentially lethal force? 

Everyone who has ever been inside a State of North Carolina administrative or judicial ‘law’ proceeding, or been before any ‘clerk’ or ‘judge’ of same, or been prosecuted by any County District Attorney within said State/STATE, has been within a “brutum fulmen”: Black’s Law Dictionary, 4t Edition: “brutum fulmen”: “An empty noise; an empty threat. A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no judgment at all, and by which no rights are are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone. Dollert v. Pratt-Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348. Also, see Corpus Juris Secundum, “Judgments” §§ 499, 512 546, 549. 

The “Office of Sheriff” is a most important link between the People of any de jure republic ‘state’ and the Courts, and Offices of the State. However, it has been discovered that many Sheriffs do not, as Chief Law Enforcement Officer of any local ‘county’ or County, have a bona fide prior or ‘precedent’ Constitutional Oath to their respective republic state. Or, they may have taken a bona fide Constitutional Oath, and then disclaimed or disavowed it immediately henceforth by taking a CORPORATE Constitutional Oath. “A man cannot serve two masters”.

This same “axiomatic” principal applies to ‘officers’ of the United States as well. How can the newly ‘sworn’ Attorney General of the UNITED STATES, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL [a federal corporation] take a Constitutional Oath to the United States, or UNITED STATES, and be held to such an Oath as ‘liable’ for his/her breach of fiduciary duty to the people of the United States of America, or to the franchise corporate trust estate ‘citizens of the UNITED STATES’, when the office ‘holder’ enjoins by contract to the ‘international purposes of Law-Lawyer tells of truth about oaths and bonds.doc Page 3 of 3 11 April 2008 INTERPOL’, under its Constitution [charter-contract] at Article 30 shortly after taking said Oath? Article 30 is quite explicit in meaning and intent. If one understands the “international purposes of INTERPOL” and all other ‘international agencies’ was and is to ‘establish a financial dictatorship within the United States/United States of America’ for the benefit of undisclosed third parties, under jurisdiction and authority of the IMF-U.N, then all of the lower level ‘breach of duty’ by lack of proper Bond and Oath issues would begin to make clear sense. [Jeff Sessions and Steven T. Mnuchin are both Interpol Officers and have renounced all loyalty to this country and its people.]

In short, all alleged ‘public servants’ are serving ‘public policy’ and ‘public administration’ of the ‘laws’ and enforcing those laws to protect the CORPORATION, to the disinterest and detriment of the People, whom have been ‘captured’, ‘searched’, ‘seized’, ‘boarded’ as with a ‘vessel’, and which People have been placed into ‘warehouse storage’ as ‘human capital’ and ‘property’ of the de facto King or “Sovereign”, which/who has conquered and occupied the Office of the People, and subverted and subordinated it into an Office of Inquisition for YOU KNOW WHO!!  [This is an example of the corruption fostered by Satanists within the Roman Catholic Church, of which many Catholics are completely unaware.]  

Lacking mandatory Oath, creates liability against the bond of the STATE, and every officer-agent-employee who has come to be ‘employed’ thereby. Breach of any underlying writing of the STATE, or State, or state, as an offer to contract in admiralty venue, is a certain “injury in fact” giving rise to a “material injustice” and resultant ‘liability’. There is no longer any question about ‘risk analysis’ or ‘damage assessment’. 

The only real issue is “HOW MUCH IS THE INJURY WORTH”? WHAT PENALTIES should be compelled above the mere “pecuniary” or monetary ‘relief’ to be sought? Treble damages? Punitive damages? Civil or Criminal or BOTH? If Oaths and Bonds have not yet been ascertained for all relevant federal and State officers, agents, and employees, they should be compelled by FOIA request or subpoena duces tecum1 immediately so that the elements of contract and breach of duty by these ‘public servants’ under mandate of relevant Constitutions, statutes, regulations, etc., including the U.C.C. in Admiralty venue can be comprehensively determined; then, a resultant ‘cause of action’ constructed accordingly. 

It is further axiomatic that: “Where a liability in equity arises due to injury by any party, and that party does not also provide a “remedy” for said liability, the injured party has the right and standing to create his own remedy” 

Persons without proper Oaths do not and cannot have proper Bonds OR satisfy the necessary requirements to “hold” a bona fide “Office”, by ‘commission’, “election”, or “appointment”. In short, an ‘Officer’ or “Office Holder” cannot but ‘occupy’ the office under false and misleading pretense, misrepresentation, and FRAUD, which strips the ‘individual’ of ‘law authority’ and ‘immunity’ under well-seasoned law of the land and sea. Brutum fulmen!! 

Bonds that are attached to such juristic ‘persons’ are subject to claim and lien, after “adequate assurance of due performance” has been found lacking pursuant to U.C.C. 2-619. A proper Oath and Bond are but two of the three primary “poles” of “Office” [Oath, Bond, Commission]. One cannot act upon being ‘duly appointed’ or ‘duly elected’ or ‘duly commissioned’ simply by INCORPORATION and CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS lacking bona fide Constitutional nexus is without “law authority”, and therefore has no nexus to the Constitutionally protected ‘Right’ of “due process”. Hence, any act or action taken against any one by any alleged ‘official’, ‘officer’, agent’ or ‘employee’ lacking such nexus is subject to CLAIM and/or COUNTER-CLAIM in Admiralty venue and proceeding. The claim, once perfected after ‘exhausting administrative remedy’ is brought against the Bond and the DUN & BRADSTREET rating of that CORPORATE PERSON will be affected as a consequence. The idea is not to seek an illegitimate claim for merely punitive or monetary purposes, but to seek claim on the basis of protest, dispute, redress, relief, and ‘remedy’!!! S 
__________________________

I need only add that since this article and other information like it has come to the surface and Rod Class has definitively proven that the relationship between the State of North Carolina and the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA is what it is, the STATE franchises have been forced to enter bankruptcy, too, as the claims against them for the injustices perpetrated by their employees quickly became overwhelming. 

This is entirely the fault of those organizations for failure to operate according to the Public Law of this country, and under no circumstance should the people of this country be "presumed" to be sureties liable for the appointments made by foreign bankruptcy trustees and the acts of foreign municipal employees who were never qualified to be bonded or to serve in any public capacity related to us. 

The corporations responsible are trying to shuffle off the liabilities created by their often criminally mis-directed employees as well as their own profligate unauthorized spending back onto the victims of this debacle, and we are saying no and saying it in no uncertain terms. 

We are not the "sureties" for these interlopers.  We are their Priority Creditors and the Priority Creditors of their parent corporations and affiliates as well. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.