Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Thursday, April 28, 2022

Public International Notice -- Witness Required

 By Anna Von Reitz

Like foxes being inexorably driven to ground, the Mayors of the Inner City of London, representing the Governments of Westminster and Ghent, are seeking to evade our email Notices and communications.  They have thus far changed their email contacts three (3) times in two years seeking to avoid the Truth. 

The Truth is that they have knowingly, willfully, and with malice conducted commercial war against us, the American Government and People, with whom they have several venerable treaties and contracts for services.  This reeks of Bad Faith and worse Performance, which no doubt they wish to conceal so that their other customers and Treaty Partners are not alarmed. 

However, they have done what they have done.  They have acted as Privateers and sailed against the very People they are obligated under contract to protect.  

They have worked a gigantic impersonation and barratry scheme against the people of the entire world, and have unjustly enriched themselves by doing so.  They have used the banks under their influence and the attorneys under their training to promote these crimes, which have in turn, allowed them to mischaracterize and misrepresent millions of innocent people as THINGS --- mere corporations that are subject to commercial and statutory law.  

They have wantonly infringed upon the Trademarks of living people to create fictional Legal Persons appearing to operate under the same Trademark and Name.  In doing so, they have impersonated living people and colluded to traffick these fabricated Persons into foreign jurisdictions for purposes of barratry.

These acts and performances are Crimes Against Humanity and are, so far as we are concerned, the Final Straw in a long history of crime associated with these "Gentlemen". 

As criminals in avoidance of the Public Law of this country and acting in avoidance of their Treaty obligations and  avoidance of their commercial contracts, and as criminals in flight from the International Law, they are not owed any special further Notice regarding their own actions. 

The origin of the current rampage of criminality has its immediate cause rooted in events occuring during the reign of King Henry VIII, amounting to his unlawful and immoral "Enclosure Acts" and the similar errors promoted during the brief and bloody hegemony of Oliver Cromwell, none of which interests us or the rest of the world, except that it provided a recipe for crime against living people that has endured to the present day and which has been repeatedly rebuffed over the course of four centuries and that scheme is summarized thus: 

"1703 – Annuities are motivation for crime:  if a person is considered lost at sea, abandoned, dead, a lunatic, a minor or incompetent (has a Cestui Que Vie Trust) then not only may their property be held in guardianship, but that a contract may be established called an "annuity" whereby a value may be granted to the guardian or custodian by the purchaser of the contract in exchange for some form of ongoing income derived from maximising the value of the estate of the infant, lunatic, lost or "dead" person. The result is the birth of annuities through such acts of parliament as Life Annuities in 1703 .  

See the 28 Million Pounds from Annuities act of 1801 listed in sequence.  Annuities depend on the existence of Cestui Que Vie Trusts."


We have already announced to the world that Prince Philip received exactly this kind of "annuity payment" in the amount of $950 Trillion USD paid to him by the GOVERNOR OF OTTAWA  exactly three days prior to his retirement from Public Office in April of 2017.  This proves that the British Government was involved in an illegal insurance scam and fraud scheme. With the collusion of the Vatican these interests created and operated Cestui Que Vie Trusts against the interests of the living people of Canada and The United States ---and received the loot from this crime scheme from a colluding Municipal Corporation operating in Canada, dba OTTAWA.  

We have reason to suspect that these activities were also pursued throughout Australia and New Zealand, other former members of the British Commonwealth, and the occupied nations of Europe. 

The only way they could pull this off was via the collusion and cooperation of the Lord Mayors of the Inner City of London and their government in contravention of our Treaties of Westminster and Treaties of Ghent. 

These Bad Actors deliberately entrapped, mischaracterized, and misrepresented millions of Americans and Canadians as incompetent minors and in the case of Americans, as infant decedants voluntarily waiving their birthright political status and estates as Americans.  

These are centuries-old white collar impersonation and insurance crimes undertaken in Gross Breach of Trust against their Creditors, Allies, Customers, and Treaty Partners.  The only way they got away with it, is with the full knowledge and cooperation and participation of Westminster and the Lord Mayors.  

It has been our long-term observation and objection to the Prosecutor's Office of the International Criminal Court that securitization is illegal, and in respect to securitization of living flesh and labor, is even more strictly prohibited as it results in peonage and enslavement of living people without their knowledge or consent.  

The leading practitioners of these crimes of securitization and "hypothecation" of debt, Goldman-Sachs, have fled this country for China.  Their partners in these crimes, the United States Attorney Generals who have owned and operated Wells Fargo Bank as a securities brokerage with a banking license, are similarly closing up shop and hoping to escape the just retribution for their acts. 

They have been running a private security corporation as "the Department of Justice' and charging the American people for the service of criminally misrepresenting them and protecting the perpetrators of these insurance scams --- all responsible for bilking the Americans and Canadians and unknown numbers of other innocent people worldwide. These and other so-called "Agencies" have never been instrumentalities of our government, have no contract, and no authority related to us.  

They are to be considered pirates, armed, and dangerous. 

These pernicious criminals were given safe harbor in Britain and through their associations with Britain were given safe harbor in New York and access to the King's Court was arranged through their own State of Delaware which was created and substituted for our American State of Delaware in the confusion immediately after the so-called American Civil War. 

These are all Crimes Against Humanity amounting to human trafficking, genocide on paper, breach of trust, fraud, racketeering, privateering, securitization fraud, impersonation, barratry, armed force extortion, misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, inland piracy, press-ganging, kidnapping, conspiracy against our treaties and constitutions, peonage, enslavement, grand felony theft, treason, misprison of treason, international criminal syndicate collusion, commodity rigging, counterfeiting, money laundering, illegal gambling, insurance fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and commercial fraud. 

No doubt a more complete investigation will yield additional crimes to add to the list.  

The evidence in support of these accusations are self-evidently the "Birth Certificates" which are actually veiled clearinghouse certificates for named CESTUI QUE VIE TRUSTS which stand as evidence of the international crimes committed against unwary Americans and Canadians by British, Dutch, and Canadian commercial interests operating under color of law and conditions of fraud, non-disclosure, and deceit. 

A warning to China is more than merited, as these criminal entities have long-prepared to invade China as their next Host, and they are clearly doing so with the intent to victimize Chinese workers via the same kind of impersonation, barratry, and securitization / insurance scams. The de-camping of Goldman-Sachs to China should be the only proof necessary. 

A genuine international effort to recognize and bring an end to this pernicious crime which has plagued our world and our business environment since the 1600s must be made. 

People are not THINGS and innocence is no excuse for allowing predators to prey upon the innocent.  

                                       By: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                                        The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

A Quick Edited Retort

 By Anna Von Reitz

Please consult any of the published Constitutions and tell me where any Federal entity has been granted duties related to disposal of our land or the conduct of our people?   The only reference to the Federal hegemony with respect to land is the ability of the States to grant use of land for arsenals and other needful facilities.  Indeed, the use of land for a Federal Capitol was granted via a special use lease by two States, Virginia and Maryland.  So even the land that Washington, DC, occupies, belongs to two States of the Union. Go figure.  If you don't own the land that sits under your Capitol..... think: what does that imply? 

It implies that you are an employee of the landlords allowing you to be there. And that is precisely the case. 

The only other organic document proposing any role for the Federal Government with respect to our land is The Northwest Ordinance, which allows the Territorial Government to occupy land acquisitions prior to their inclusion as States of the Union.  That is precisely the status of the Insular States like Guam and Puerto Rico to this day.  

I fail to see what your big Bone of Contention may be.  The separation of actuality into living people, lawful persons, and legal fiction persons, is so well established in law that it should not require any explanation or argument.  

The right of a living man to use his Family Name as a Trademark to conduct business in International Trade goes back to the Stone Age.  That's his Lawful Person, the way he identifies his business in International Trade.  Such use of his own Good Name does not make him the property of a government organization, a subject of a Queen, nor a US CORPORATION.  

Our paperwork serves Notice on the Federal Government (which operates as a parent corporation)  and its State-of-State franchises, that we are Americans, not voluntarily adopting any identity as foreign Persons.  There is nothing complex, or controversial about this, but it must be done to forestall their ability to otherwise presume whatever they wish to presume about us.  

Now that that is explained to you in terms that you can understand, what is your beef?  We aren't Federal Citizens.  We have no obligation to be Federal Citizens. And so what?  What business is that of yours?  Why are you all up in arms and flapping around and sending me reams of federal court cases and federal code that does not apply to me or to Americans generally?  

When we delegated certain enumerated powers to our Federal Subcontractors, they acquired the right and the duty to define how they were going to do their jobs.  They do that by posting new laws governing their own employees and officers and dependents on the Federal Register. 

If, which is rare, they create a code entry that impacts the General Public, they publish it on the Federal Record. 

Wake up.  Smell java.  Federal "laws" that aren't published on the Federal Record don't apply to Americans, and those that are published on the Federal Record only apply to Americans when those Americans are engaged in Federally regulated activities or entering Federal buildings, military bases, etc. 

Otherwise, none of the Federal Code and none of their affiliated State of State Statute Law applies to us.  It's literally foreign law. We are not obligated to know or obey it at all.  See Amendment XI.  

What we do need to do is to identify ourselves and our lawful government so that our Employees are not granted the discretion to suppose whatever they may wish to suppose about us. 

That is precisely what we are doing by recording our political status, and it's no skin off of anyone's nose that we do so.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

I Beg Your Pardon.... I Am Not "Difficult" to Get Along With

 By Anna Von Reitz

No, I am not a difficult person and I am not difficult to get along with. I am a typical Great-Grandma.  All I want to do is to clean the house and get things back in order, so that all my kids can have a decent life. 

Simple enough. 

Maybe we will even have a Family Reunion and everyone will figure out that we are related to each other.  

And nobody is any better or different or "more equal" --- contrary to the British Idea.  

I am an American, and by that I mean part of the population of that portion of North America known variously as The United States when referring to the National Soil Jurisdiction, and as The United States of America when referring to our country in International or Global Jurisdiction.  

However, in terms of my Nationality, I am more properly known as a Wisconsinite. 

Like all other Americans, I obtain my nationality from my State of the Union.  

Nationality has nothing to do with citizenship and carries with it no obligations of citizenship.

Citizenship by its very nature implies an obligation to serve a government.  

In America, the government serves the people, not the other way around. 

So, I acquire no citizenship simply by being born in this country. 

That's the way it is and the way it has been since 1776. 

There are people, Tories and Catholics, who accept citizenship obligations to their foreign governments from birth.  Catholics are slaves of the Pope as long as they are Catholics.  Brits are indentured servants of the Queen as long as they are Brits. 

That's their problem so far as the rest of us are concerned.  It has nothing to do with us and it should not be made an issue.  Choice of political affiliation is sacrosanct, a fundamental right. 

If I receive a regular and sufficient employment paycheck from any government, then I have an obligation to serve it as a condition of employment.  

As an American, I have to respect the Constitutional agreements made by the American States, but, by-and-large, unless I freely decide to engage in "federally regulated" activities, the only part of the Constitutions that apply to me are the Guarantees embodied by The Bill of Rights. 

And that's the way it is, folks.  It's going to take one helluva bloody war to change it, so I suggest that the Pope and the Queen and the Lord Mayor and the Secretary-General accept the peace and instruct their loyal citizenry to play fair from now on. 

They know what the contract says as well as we do.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Plan and I -- Public Notice to the Generals 2.0

 
By Anna Von Reitz

Follow the logic:  

Lincoln put the Military in charge of the money, but Lincoln never had authority to do that because he wasn't an American President.  He was a British Territorial "President".  So everything he did was tainted by that fundamental fraud.  

The entire American Civil War was conducted under conditions of fraud and deceit.  It wasn't even a war.  It was a mercenary conflict.  There's no Declaration of War from Congress.  There was no Peace Treaty officially ending it until 2021.  

Lincoln had no authority to adopt the Lieber Code.  He had no authority to set aside the Constitution or any other law in favor of the Lieber Code.  He had no authority to start issuing Executive Orders and he had no Emergency Powers, either. 

His Successors have been just as wrong-headed and their actions have been just as fraudulent and illegal, too.  

The entire basis authorizing the military to act outside its appointed role is flawed and the Constitution governing the Territorial Government was never "set aside".  An action undertaken without authority and  under conditions of fraud is null and void. 

That's for starters, but you will also notice that with that plank in place, there isn't a word in any Constitution granting the Federal Government any control over land or people on the land.  

That's because the Federal Subcontractors had no duties related to the land and people, except for the The Northwest Ordinance, which allows the Territorial United States Government to hold new Territories in a custodial capacity until they qualify to become States of the Union.  

And in the Territorial Constitution, the States may set aside land for the Territorial Government's use for needful things like arsenals, required for the defense of our country.  

There is no valid basis, legal or otherwise, for our hired military to occupy our country, control our money, or anything else promoted by the Lieber Code. 

The Plan to give our land back to Native Americans is obviously illegal, as it is our land and our employees have no role in distributing our property "for" us, but there are other objections. 

Sovereignty is tied to land.  You cannot be a sovereign nation without it.  

So, the Plan is offering to give away our national sovereignty to the Indians. 

Yes, Natives are sovereign now  --- in the same sense that all other Americans born on the land and soil of this country are sovereign, but if our sovereignty goes, so does theirs. 

Otherwise, Natives are members of Tribes and Tribes are obligated to pay Tribute to Rome.  They are slaves of the Pope.  

So what the Plan is setting up is the Status Quo with Perks, basically the same old story, different day. 

According to the Plan, the military retains control of all the money --- not only in America, but worldwide in all the other illegally occupied countries.  How is that any different?  

According to the Plan, our national sovereignty will be undermined and the Natives will be able to act as Tax Collectors for the Pope.  The Natives will have their hands in our pockets and the Pope will have his hands in their pockets.   How is that any change?  

What needs to happen is for our States of the Union to be recognized as the trustworthy custodians of our respective national land assets, and for Public Elections --- not corporate shareholder elections --- to take place for the first time in 160 years.  

What needs to happen is for the military to do its duty to protect this country from invasion (which is happening at our Southern Border) and treasonous Vermin (which is happening in Washington, DC) and otherwise assist in returning the respective national governments of our States to full function. 

The Plan to return funds that are owed to  veterans and their families is fine by us, but the rest of the money needs to be returned to the civilian government of the States of the Union and there needs to be a separate new civilian banking system, too.  

We have such a new civilian banking system ready to go.  The military simply needs to observe its actual limitations and get out of the way of their Employers, who are attending to their own business.  

We wish for the return of all our public and private assets which have been commandeered and socked away in various kinds of trusts without our knowledge or permission. 

We wish for the return of our land assets to the control of our States of the Union.  

We wish for the return of our purloined gold and silver assets and a share of the pre-paid credit assets generated from them.  

We wish for peace and an end to improper Legal Presumptions being misapplied to our people by our subcontractors and an end to illegal occupation of our country by our own military forces. 

We wish for our military to address the threats that various foreign corporations pose to our health and welfare, including Bayer, Monsanto, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, and Johnson and Johnson, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, Goldman-Sachs, the Depository Trust Corporation, JPMorganChase, et alia. 

We wish for our military to address and end continuing Weather Warfare and illegal testing of frequency-based scalar weapons on members of the military and the American Public. 

We wish for our military to address the illegal spraying of metallic salts and industrial wastes on our land and our population and the pollution of our water supplies with similar industrial waste products including Fluoride and Chlorine, and the pollution of our food sources with noxious chemicals and misapplied genetic engineering.  

We wish for our military to wake up and put an end to the politicians and alphabet soup agencies which our government has not authorized, and which have been carrying out "war" against their employers and benefactors.  

We all desperately need to get this country back on track.  That is not going to happen by mindlessly ignoring clear and present dangers and continued predatory action against your Employers.  

             By: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

             The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Big Lebowski Revisited - Public Notice to the Generals

 By Anna Von Reitz

The question is, are you Lebowski or is he Lebowski?  Or is someone else here Lebowski?  Will the real Lebowski please stand up?  And then you look at all the guys who stand up.... 

In the near future I expect the Generals to present their answer to the worldwide dilemma which corporate policies promoting "perpetual war" created, and in particular, the problems caused by the fraudulent Administration of Abraham Lincoln and his activities including his establishment of the Lieber Code and the practice of issuing "Executive Orders".  

Turns out that Lincoln wasn't actually our President.  He was the Queen's "president" running a look-alike, sound-alike British commercial corporation doing business as "the United States of America, Incorporated".  

He was operating in fraud from the get-go, and everything he touched was tainted by it.  

Now the modern-day Generals who have replaced those who followed Lincoln's orders and later deposed him, only to take the bit in their own teeth and continue the fraud--- have been forced to consider this lamentable history and its legal and lawful ramifications.  

Not surprisingly, their first instinct was to evaluate the books to see how they and other veterans had been cheated by the banks, and they found plenty skimmed off, Slush Funded, never delivered, siphoned off by legal con-artistry, you name it.  

Their initial answer was to create their own banking system and make the recoupment available to veterans and their families, which is fine by us. 

There is, however, the issue of the civilian Public Interest in all the other recouped funds and the return of private property assets that were swept up in the worldwide dragnet still to be resolved. 

Not everyone has a direct ancestor, husband, father, mother, brother or son or daughter who was a veteran --- by far and away, most of us do, but not all. 

There are groups of religious Pacifists, the very young and the very old who one way or another couldn't serve even if they wanted to, the women who made the gunpowder, the newly naturalized Americans and many others who will drop through the cracks if the funding owed the civilian government is not restored as part of the overall recoupment.  

Moreover, the issues of political status must be squarely addressed.  Ever since the Civil War, all our Veterans have been mistakenly inducted as British Territorial U.S. Citizens, and since the First World War, it has been "presumed" that they "voluntarily" stayed in that foreign political status even after they were discharged from the service and returned home.  

Unless they individually wrote letters to the head of their service branch and informed him (or her) that they were returning home to their birthright political status, it was assumed that they "chose" to remain in the foreign British Territorial political status forever afterward.  

Conveniently, these men and women were never told that they had a choice, and so never realized that action on their part was necessary to recoup their original American birthright political status.  

In this way, they continued to be commandeered and counted as British Territorial Citizens and the Queen's Subjects ---without them ever being the wiser.  

This resulted in millions of military service members being deprived of their native political status as Americans and in continuing foreign citizenship obligations being enforced against them by members of the British Bar Associations even long after their tours of duty ended. 

They fought for freedom they were never allowed to enjoy.  They earned benefits that they were never given.  They were cheated out of their inheritance by sins of omission.

Problem is, whether you are in British Territorial status and functioning as a U.S. Citizen under the foreign international Law of the Sea, or an American standing under the Law of the Land, your name looks the same, you look the same, you feel the same, everything appears to be the same --- except that in one status you are a subject of the Queen and obligated to obey her foreign law, and in the other, you are free and heir to your land and guarantees of the Constitutions. 

I just gave everyone a bird's eye view of this process in the recent "Your Sheriff or My Sheriff" article.  Our unincorporated County Government organizations were unlawfully and without any granted authority converted into British Territorial commercial corporation franchises in the business of providing governmental services.  This allowed these organizations to get payola and kickbacks in the form of "Federal Block Grants" -- but it also converted Public Officers and Elected Officials (like our County Sheriffs) into private corporation employees having no Public Office or attendant authority whatsoever. 

This same process unlawfully converted our election processes from being Public Elections to being private corporation shareholder "elections" orchestrated by political lobbyist organizations.  

An Elector casting their ballot in a Public Election is electing a Public Official who is responsible to the Public Interest and operating under the Public Law.  

A voter casting their vote in a private commercial shareholder election to elect a "Representative" is handing their proxy to that person to do whatever to hell that person wants to do with it--- without any accountability to the individual "voter". 

A Public Official in this country is accountable as a Fiduciary and must demonstrate Good Faith in what they do in the name of the Public Interest.  They also function under Public Law and have to uphold and enforce the Constitutional Guarantees owed to the people of this country.  

An elected Corporate Representative holding proxy votes of shareholders, by contrast, is not liable as a Fiduciary, doesn't have to demonstrate Good Faith, and doesn't function under Public Law and doesn't have any obligation to uphold and enforce the Constitutions. 

This is how the foreign federal subcontractors operated by the Brits and the Popes conspired to evade their obligations to the people of this country and the limitations imposed by the Constitutions.  

As the Generals unveil their big programs for Veterans and the grateful people who are veterans and who have family members who are veterans surge forward to reap all the benefits that they and their ancestors have been denied, there will be new elections held ---- but wait a minute!  What kind of elections?  

Public elections or more private commercial corporation elections?  

Are we going to be electing actual American County Sheriffs to Public Offices or are we going to be electing British Territorial "County" "Sheriffs" to private corporation offices?  

Look sharp.  Hold the Generals accountable. 

The military is supposed to be answering to the people of this country and operating under the limitations of our State's Constitutional agreements with them --- not the British Territorial States-of-States Constitutions that were rammed down our throats in the wake of the Civil War as "emergency" actions undertaken via non-existent "Emergency Powers".  

This whole situation requires the return to our original State Constitutions and in many cases, the writing of actual State Constitutions for the Western States of the Union.  It requires the removal of the present "State of State" Governors and Employees and Legislatures and the return of actual State Delegates and American Governors and American State Legislatures. 

The people of this country have to be educated and enabled to make these choices and recognize the fact that the whole song and dance presented by the Political Parties is foreign.  They have to be made aware of the vital difference between acting as a Public Elector and acting as a Shareholder/Voter in private foreign corporation elections. 

The Generals have to make a clean breast of it or it will be just another fraud scheme allowing the Brits, the Popes, or some combination thereof to keep their hands in our pockets. 

This is part and parcel of my objection to the proposal to "give the land back to the Indians".  

In the first place, the Native Nations are all classed as "dependent Sovereignties" meaning that their sovereignty depends on our sovereignty.  .  Their sovereignty was won, like the sovereignty of all Americans was won, by force of arms by our Continental Army and depends on our treaties and results from being born on the land and soil of this country.  

In the second place, the Native Nations have allowed themselves to be identified as "tribes" owing "tribute" to the Roman Municipal Government. 

So what happens when the Generals give the land back to the Natives instead of returning it to the people and the States of the Union?  The Native Nations assume the right to tax all the rest of us, and the Popes assume the right to tax the Native Tribes, and there you have it all again --- both the Natives and the Popes with their hands in our pockets. 

How long does everyone expect that to last, before the 93% white, black, and Asian population rises up and decimates the quote-unquote "Native" population? 

This is just a recipe for disaster in which, once again, some pigs are being defined as "more equal" than other pigs, and the Popes keep their fingers in the pie. 

For that reason, there can be no settlement in which Native Tribes receive title or patent or anything else related to the land jurisdiction of the States and people. 

The interests and treaties owed to the States must be honored or there is no settlement agreement and no national sovereignty available to anyone including the Native Nations. 

Private property must be returned under terms agreeable to the actual owners or there is no settlement.  
                                              By: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                                               The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.