Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Thursday, April 28, 2022

A Quick Edited Retort

 By Anna Von Reitz

Please consult any of the published Constitutions and tell me where any Federal entity has been granted duties related to disposal of our land or the conduct of our people?   The only reference to the Federal hegemony with respect to land is the ability of the States to grant use of land for arsenals and other needful facilities.  Indeed, the use of land for a Federal Capitol was granted via a special use lease by two States, Virginia and Maryland.  So even the land that Washington, DC, occupies, belongs to two States of the Union. Go figure.  If you don't own the land that sits under your Capitol..... think: what does that imply? 

It implies that you are an employee of the landlords allowing you to be there. And that is precisely the case. 

The only other organic document proposing any role for the Federal Government with respect to our land is The Northwest Ordinance, which allows the Territorial Government to occupy land acquisitions prior to their inclusion as States of the Union.  That is precisely the status of the Insular States like Guam and Puerto Rico to this day.  

I fail to see what your big Bone of Contention may be.  The separation of actuality into living people, lawful persons, and legal fiction persons, is so well established in law that it should not require any explanation or argument.  

The right of a living man to use his Family Name as a Trademark to conduct business in International Trade goes back to the Stone Age.  That's his Lawful Person, the way he identifies his business in International Trade.  Such use of his own Good Name does not make him the property of a government organization, a subject of a Queen, nor a US CORPORATION.  

Our paperwork serves Notice on the Federal Government (which operates as a parent corporation)  and its State-of-State franchises, that we are Americans, not voluntarily adopting any identity as foreign Persons.  There is nothing complex, or controversial about this, but it must be done to forestall their ability to otherwise presume whatever they wish to presume about us.  

Now that that is explained to you in terms that you can understand, what is your beef?  We aren't Federal Citizens.  We have no obligation to be Federal Citizens. And so what?  What business is that of yours?  Why are you all up in arms and flapping around and sending me reams of federal court cases and federal code that does not apply to me or to Americans generally?  

When we delegated certain enumerated powers to our Federal Subcontractors, they acquired the right and the duty to define how they were going to do their jobs.  They do that by posting new laws governing their own employees and officers and dependents on the Federal Register. 

If, which is rare, they create a code entry that impacts the General Public, they publish it on the Federal Record. 

Wake up.  Smell java.  Federal "laws" that aren't published on the Federal Record don't apply to Americans, and those that are published on the Federal Record only apply to Americans when those Americans are engaged in Federally regulated activities or entering Federal buildings, military bases, etc. 

Otherwise, none of the Federal Code and none of their affiliated State of State Statute Law applies to us.  It's literally foreign law. We are not obligated to know or obey it at all.  See Amendment XI.  

What we do need to do is to identify ourselves and our lawful government so that our Employees are not granted the discretion to suppose whatever they may wish to suppose about us. 

That is precisely what we are doing by recording our political status, and it's no skin off of anyone's nose that we do so.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

5 comments:

  1. "...Federal "laws" that aren't published on the Federal Record don't apply to Americans, and those that are published on the Federal Record only apply to Americans when those Americans are engaged in Federally regulated activities or entering Federal buildings, military bases, etc.

    Otherwise, none of the Federal Code and none of their affiliated State of State Statute Law applies to us. It's literally foreign law. We are not obligated to know or obey it at all. ..."

    our, the American men and womens, law is American [not British/other] common law.

    American man: American common law: under authority of the laws of nature and natures creator/God
    --DeclarofIndep, July 2[two], 1776.
    and it is so.

    woman:janmarie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wish to know who exactly Anna is addressing. I assume its the JCS?
      RMiraglia

      Delete
  2. "What we do need to do is to identify ourselves and our lawful government so that our Employees are not granted the discretion to suppose whatever they may wish to suppose about us. "
    __________
    they are not the American peoples' Employees since the American people did not consent to ratification of the Constitution/s that is, (off-and- on), being used *as* *if* it was a contract with us, but there is nothing showing that it was so-ratified.
    __________
    additionally, and just as important,: there are NO SIGNATORIES except Signatory *Witnesses*; and witnesses *to* a contract are not responsible for fulfilling it.
    _________
    so, it having no Signatories responsible for fulfilling the "contract" and not having consent from the people through lawful ratification, there is no contract; and therefore, there are no Employees that the American people hired that way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pertaining to whatever "Employment Contracts" exist, if any, it is men and women and their Affiliates who work for the Corporations and who have "knowingly" been involved in issuing contracts/ other that are "collateralized" using what belongs to another man without that other mans agreement; that is: without law-ful authority to do: those are the men and women who are actually responsible, themSELVES, for those contracts/ agreements.

      and there is nothing like "Force Majeure" to hide behind in American common law... the man who created harm is responsible to restore.

      Delete
  3. That’s not what it implies.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE Anonymous or unknown; YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.