Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Monday, August 31, 2020

New 30 day super promotion from Mint Builder

How big do you want to build your wealth?

30 Day Wealth Expansion from MintBuilder on Vimeo.

This new promotion begins at Midnight September 1st, and runs for 30 days for Everyone that Joins, so you will have 30 days from the day you come in to take advantage of all the extra wealth Mint Builder is giving away.  

If you have not been active in Mint Builder, or you are new to this system of accumulating wealth, now is your chance to make a big difference in your life that will last for years to come.

Anyone can do this. If you already have your membership, and start a subscription you are on your way.

Watch all three videos. The one above, and two more, and you will see the potential without a doubt.

Here is my link to Get Started.

We provide all the tools and websites and advertising free with your membership.

Paul Stramer  406 889 3183  Best time to call is 8 AM to 2 PM, then 4 pm to 8 PM Mountain.

Public Notice to United States Attorney General William P Barr


By Anna Von Reitz

It has come to our attention that a misunderstanding exists regarding your Successor-ship and your Administration of the Office of Custodian of Alien Property, which has been exercising improper restraints and improper Legal Presumptions against Americans and the assets of Americans since 1917.
The essence of this opportunistic misunderstanding appears to be rooted in the history of the mercenary conflict known as The American Civil War, and the disposition of the civilian population of this country with respect to it.
Please note that we, and our unincorporated Federation of States, The United States of America, have been at peace since 1814. This was underscored by President Andrew Johnson, who formally acknowledged and accepted peace on the land via three separate Presidential Proclamations on May 10th of 1865, and again on April 2nd and August 20th of 1866.
There can be no doubt whatsoever that the civilian population of this country was not engaged in the Civil War and is not now and has never been an Enemy, nor have we been subject to any foreign power, including our own Delegated Power. Additionally, we have been at peace within our land jurisdiction since 1865 and this has been freely agreed to and admitted.
Unlike your government, our government is rarely in Session, but owing to the continued Bad Faith and criminal misbehavior of our Federal Subcontractors, the actual American Government has been summoned to assemble. There are now fifty properly declared and qualified State Assemblies in operation.
Any presumption of any untoward custodial interest in us or our property, must be abandoned. Any trust, public transmitting utility, public charitable trust, state trust or other incorporated entity constructed in our names, including any doing --business-as names must be dissolved and the assets contained therein or assigned under these constructs must be returned to our administration, free and clear of debt or encumbrance.
There has been an assertion made to the effect that we are required to give you Notice of our claim to own and possess our own property --- property seized by mistake by the Custodian of Alien Property decades ago and mis-administered in our names ever since by Federal Subcontractors.
The essence of this aforesaid assertion is that anyone wishing to obtain back property seized by the Office of the Custodian of Alien Property has to do so in compliance with 50 USC 4309, but---- (1) this is your internal administrative "law" not ours and we are not subject to it and have no federal contracts related to this issue, so it remains under our direct discretion per Amendment X and XI; (2) we are civilian non-citizens owed all recognition as such and all duties and guarantees, (3) we and our property assets have never been in your jurisdiction, and any Legal Presumption or Unlawful Conversion otherwise needs to be immediately cured, abandoned, and dispatched with prejudice.
Indeed, we have no need or obligation to respond to your Federal Code, but you do have an obligation to obey our Public Law ---and you and the Bankruptcy Trustees are all hereby being given full and appropriate Public Notice to return our property assets unfettered and unharmed.
We are your Employers and always have been. You have received your paychecks from our largess. Any misdirection you have received from those Principals exercising our Delegated Powers for us, needs to be corrected.
The Powers once delegated to the Federal Republic doing-business-as the States of America have returned by Operation of Law to the Delegators, The United States of America, our Several States, and our People.
Our Government is now in Session and any assumption of custodial interest that the Territorial or Municipal United States have undertaken in our purported absence must be set aside and all our property --- including but not limited to our intellectual property, our Good Names, our patents, copyrights, and trademarks, accounts, land, and all else that we are owed --- must be set free of obstruction and misrepresentation and returned to our administration without further misunderstanding.
The Generation Skipping Trust Scheme, the unconscionable conferring of foreign citizenship obligations, and the abuse of Usufruct privileges must stop.
This is your Due Notice, United States Attorney General William P. Barr. Take note and take action accordingly. Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals, Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary, The United States of America
via RE 162 265 575 US


See this article and over 2600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Dear Mr. Trump -- 31 August 2020


By Anna Von Reitz

We can help you dig out of this Mess, but you have to work with us, and take your direction from the actual civilian government of this country.  

That includes the military and your office as Commander-in-Chief.
You can all read the actual Federal Constitutions, all three of them, and you have cause to know that the Municipal "District" Government is severely limited and is meant to be severely limited on purpose.  That was not a mistake. The Constitution of the United States is our only agreement regarding the Municipal Government.  

The usurpations that the Municipal Government has engaged in have resulted in 185,000 Municipal corporations being deployed on our land and soil in contravention of our agreements with the Holy See.  

Many of those illegally and unlawfully established Municipal Corporations are now running our towns and cities as "Municipalities", "Boroughs" and similar foreign structures --- and these False Governors and False Mayors are thumbing their noses at you and at us, in a process akin to standing on someone's foot and then blaming them for violating your personal space. 

These criminals, most of them from the Democratic Party and the Globalist Movement, are allowing looting, murder, arson and other criminal activity to run rampant.  They are sitting there like toads and not lifting a finger to suppress this rampage of crime and destruction and are preventing you from doing anything about it, while using false legal arguments to pull this off. 

 And then, they are blaming you and your Administration for their own bad behavior, criminal negligence, usurpation, and Bad Faith. 

They claim that your forces are "Federal" and not allowed to take action within the Several States or within their international city-states.  

While it is true that your forces are Federal, so are their Municipal government corporations, and they have even less business existing and operating within the boundaries of our Several States.  Read Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 and understand what their actual mandate is and what their limitations are. 

The key to this is to realize that their "international city-states" are in violation of their constitutional obligations and limitations and should not even exist.  These municipal corporations, together with their "Gubernatorial" and "Mayoral" offices need to be liquidated for criminal negligence, constructive fraud, criminal trespass, Breach of Trust, and violation of their constitutional obligations. 

Pope Francis knows this and is simply not doing his duties under Ecclesiastical Law.

Liquidation of these Municipal Government sub units is the easy and peaceful and lawfully required answer.  He can do it with the stroke of a pen, and should be prevailed upon to do so. 
The administration and the assets of these illegally and unlawfully constructed Municipal Government franchises should be returned to the actual States and the actual State Assemblies, with your assistance. 

You have our permission to restore Public Law and Order under the Insurrection Act and are requested and required to do so; please feel free to expose these shameless, self-serving hypocrites for what they are.  

You are also authorized to end all participation in the United Nations World Health Organization "live exercise".  The CDC has quietly admitted that only 6% of the reported "Covid 19" deaths are actually attributable to any form of Common Cold Virus and we do not intend to let this go on any further.  Shut it down. 

You may also inform the insurance companies that these Municipal Corporations are engaged in deliberate acts of self-destruction and self-vandalism, that is, insurance fraud, and should not be allowed to recoup their damages. 

The faster FRANCISCUS gets a fire lit under his tail, the better. And the faster you realize the power of your actual office, the better.  There is a clear, continuing and public danger that you are, as Commander-in-Chief, required to act upon.  

The Municipal Mayors and Governors are functioning illegally, unlawfully, and outside their constitutionally approved boundaries. This is a matter of international crime, not politics.  

If Pope Francis doesn't move his bustle, you have our permission as the Ultimate Employers and Delegators of the Enumerated Powers, to move it for him. 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary, The United States of America


See this article and over 2600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Languages of Law


By Anna Von Reitz

Today I have had three (3) questions that all revolve around the same issue --- the languages of law.  

It comes as a surprise to many people to learn that there is more than one kind of law.  All their lives they have heard about "the" law, so they assume there is only one law, and everyone has to follow it.  

There are many kinds of law, and in the modern world, they are basically separated into two kinds: pagan and Judeo-Christian. 

The international jurisdiction of the sea and the global jurisdiction of the air use pagan law that is called "negative law" because it speaks in terms of negatives: Thou shalt not kill.  They also use negative averment: "Is it not true that you ate dinner at Dino's Salad Bar on Friday, the eleventh of June, 2014?"  And they even use contracts to guarantee true testimony: "I swear under penalty of perjury...."   

Oddly, as noted above, The Ten Commandments are stated in negative terms in the Bible, but then, these are early laws, and laws back then were all cast in the negative form.  You could just as easily (and more profitably in my opinion) recast "Thou shalt not kill." to "Thou shall preserve life." 

The development of law and the languages of law and their development in our history of the world, parallels our experience of law in our early lives as children.  One of the first words we all learn is: "No!" 

In the same way, the earlier pagan law forms focus on negatives, on what you are not supposed to do,  

One of our Coordinators asked --- hey, why does the 1779 Declaration use penalty of perjury wording, when over here in the Jural Assembly Handbook, you say that we don't use the perjury oath and use "to the best of my knowledge and belief" instead?  


Because of what they have done to remove us from our natural estate, we are all starting out "at sea", and the law of the international jurisdiction of the sea is pagan, negative law.  It uses oaths and contracts to get things done.  When you generate a document in that jurisdiction, you use its language because that is where you are. Thus, we use a perjury contract for the 1779 Declaration, but once we are back on the land, we use Good Faith affirmations. 

The language you use, as much as anything else, determines the jurisdiction you are in.  

I have a man who is attempting to claim his lawful estate, which in his case involves gold bullion.  The bullion was left on deposit at a well-known bank.  The bank acknowledges that yes, it is there and being held in his name, but they won't give him access to it.  

It's his, but it's not.  

This is because his political status was changed and he was kidnapped and unlawfully converted into a citizen of the United States.  As a citizen of the United States, he is a slave and has no property rights, and no ability to inherit lawful assets, that is, physical assets like gold or silver. 

So we've helped him recoup his natural birthright political status, so that he can shove it up the bank's nose, but he keeps straying back into their jurisdiction and keeps wanting to argue in their courts and use their definitions and language.   

Yesterday, he berated me with definitions from Black's Law Dictionary and wrote letters to Bar Attorneys, still thinking that getting control of his gold is a matter of what he does, rather than a matter of what he is.  

I had to tell him that--- big news--- we don't use Black's Law Dictionary.  That's what they use in the international jurisdiction of the sea, and we are on the land, so we use Bouvier's Law Dictionary.  

Similarly, we use the Geneva Bible, not the King James.  

If you use the language of the international jurisdiction of the sea and address their courts, use their dictionaries, and spout their Federal Code ---- what can they assume from that?  -- That you are subjecting yourself to their jurisdiction, and that you belong in their jurisdiction.  Why else would you be jabbering away in Legalese?  And quoting Black's Law?  

The same thing happens with court citations.  I've had more questions of the I-can't-find-the-court-case-you-referenced kind.  Why?  Because people are hitting the internet search bar and bringing up resources like and looking for land jurisdiction cases among Admiralty and Maritime and Commercial cases.

Why would you look for land jurisdiction cases among sea jurisdiction cases?  

To find these cases, you will need to go to a law library and look them up. It's The United States Supreme Court deciding these cases, not the U.S. Supreme Court, not the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, not the Supreme Court of the United States....  

Just like there is no such thing as "the" law, there is no such thing as "the" Supreme Court, either. 

All these different names for what appears to be the same court exist for a reason.  They exist because "the" Supreme Court decides cases that exist in diverse jurisdictions of the law.  

By far the largest number of cases they consider are Admiralty, Maritime, and Commercial cases, but they do consider land law cases to the extent of determining what is in their corral and what is not.  Because these cases are relatively few in number and foreign with respect to the vast bulk of Supreme Court case law, they aren't lumped in with the rest. 

Different language.  Different jurisdictional considerations.  Different subject matter.  

It's all part of being aware of the different languages and jurisdictions--- and the simple fact that there isn't one monolithic thing out there called "the" law.  There are many variations and kinds of law --- and we, Americans, need to learn the difference, so that we can make better use of our own  Public Law.


See this article and over 2600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Steve Baldwin Exposes Kamala Harris

 "I watched an interview with her.  She is attractive, animated and absurd.  She stated that she never had children; yet was a “Mother to her husband’s children.” And she “loved being a Mother.”  She said the children called her “Momela”. Anyway, she led her audience to believe that she mothered these kids.  I looked her up.  She married her husband when the son was in his 3rd year of college and the daughter was in 10th grade and they actually lived with their biological Mother, except for normal visits with their father—so much for Motherhood.  Right after hearing that, I discovered she was an

opportunistic liar.

She is beating Pence in the Current ratings for VP.

I do remember Kamala Harris. I had just been elected to the State Assembly in 1994 and, at that time, the ultimate “power broker” that controlled every aspect of California’s state government was the Speaker of the House, Willie Brown. He ran Sacramento like it was his own personal fiefdom and handed out jobs to loyalists and fired people who were disloyal. He broke every ethical law in the book, but was never held to account by anyone. He was married, but openly had mistresses which he showed off by bringing them to public events.

At the time I arrived in Sacramento, Willie was seeing a young girl who was in her late 20’s. He was in his 60’s. She was his mistress and he showered her with gifts and appointed her to a number of State government jobs. Her name was Kamala Harris. Willie launched her political career because she was having sex with him. The idea that she is an “independent” woman who worked her way up the political ladder because she worked hard is baloney. It is common knowledge in California that Kamala slept her way into powerful political jobs.

And now she is running for VP with a man who will be unable to govern due to his lack of mental clarity. In essence, she will function as the President of the United States should the Biden/Harris ticket prevail this November. Her views on guns, taxes, immigration, energy, etc. are far to the left of the average America, but you watch the media ignore these positions.

For example, she believes illegal aliens are eligible to ALL government services, including education, welfare benefits, health care, you name it. In other words, she does NOT believe there is a difference between a citizen and a non-citizen. That view alone will cost us billions of dollars if acted upon. Her view of the constitution is frankly bizarre and dangerous and she is willing to
enact laws restricting our 2nd Amendment rights even if such laws violate our constitution.

She will be the most radical person to run for VP in American history, but you won’t see any of this on the news. You will soon witness a massive campaign by the media to deceive you about who she is and what
she believes. Don’t fall for it."

Steve Baldwin, former Congressman, State of California

Revealed: Here is the Horrifying Sexual Assault Criminal Complaint Against Jacob Blake

 29-year-old Jacob Blake was shot 7 times in the back by a Kenosha police officer last Sunday after Blake brawled with the cops, resisted arrest, shrugged off two tasers and had a knife in his possession.

The New York Post obtained the sexual assault criminal complaint against Jacob Blake and it is horrifying.

About Counties


By Anna Von Reitz

I am sad tonight, reflecting on all the many efforts that are suddenly being made by so many alarmed Americans ---- and the sheer amount of money and energy that is being wasted, because these same alarmed Americans are stumbling around in the dark and (a) trying to do things that can't be done; (b) doing things that have already been done; or (c) don't know what to do, but are determined to do something! 

They are just now taking stock of the old "You Know Something is Wrong When...."  paradigm.  

Painfully, often with a jolt, they are waking up and trying to get their bearings, and having been newly convinced that they've been lied to, used, abused, and defrauded ---- they are highly motivated, but unfocused.  And full of theories and assumptions.  It's the Jews.  It's the Muslims.  It's anybody who doesn't look like us.  It's anybody that doesn't attend the same church.  It's anybody who isn't the same color. 

This is causing a tremendous amount of confusion and bad blood for no good reason.  The structure, nature, and powers of our government are well-known and already set forth.  No need to recreate the wheel -- just need to operate the machinery that is already established. 

I've often compared our actual government of the people, for the people and by the people to an old car or other big machine that has sat out in a shed on the back forty for decades.  It has been sitting there, ready to use, but not fired up--- until we've forgotten how it works and have to read the Operator's Manual again. 

Today, I saw another beautiful website that people have spent time and money on, and yet another organization "trying to do something" about the problems we face ---- TacticalCIVICS.  These people are trying to organize and assemble all 3141 Counties in this country, and they already have 190 of them on board....

They apparently believe that the Counties, by themselves, can take on the Federal Government, but that is not true. 

The Counties have no viable jurisdictional interface with the Federal Government.  They have to go through their States. 

The Counties occupy the soil jurisdiction of this country and they hold the highest local government power, but they were deliberately "marooned" with only that supreme local power for a reason.  

They were separated out and cut off from international affairs so that they could never make a mistake and sign away their sovereign status. That is, in part, why we still have a country.  And still have 3141 Counties, too. 

Even though many county government organizations voted to incorporate themselves in order to get Federal Block Grants back in the 1960's, they didn't have any way to remove the County from the soil, or the soil from the County. 

They could remove themselves, and name a corporation after the County, but the County couldn't be moved because the Founders blocked that possibility a long time ago.  

The good news is that the States, which do have international powers, are already in  the assembly process and making steam.  As people join their State Assemblies, the County Assemblies are automatically being repopulated, too. 

When a man from LaGrange County, Louisiana, joins the Louisiana Assembly it has two automatic impacts --- Louisiana is repopulated, and LaGrange County is repopulated. Both. At the same time. As a result, your local government is being rebuilt at the same time as your State Government. 

And your State Government has international powers and is "competent" -- that is, has the necessary jurisdictional interfaces and capacities --- to deal with the Federales. 

So don't worry about organizing all 3141 Counties as separate entities and then try to build the States.  Build the States and repopulate the Counties at the same time, so that you have the means via your State organizations to address  Federal issues right now, today. 


See this article and over 2600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.



Posted by  | Aug 15, 2020 | 

Any readers of American Partisan who are interested in understanding the evolution of ABR (Antifa-BLM-RevCom) tactics and strategy should make Andy Ngo’s Twitter feed a daily stop. Ngo is literally orders of magnitude better than any other internet or MSM reporter when it comes to finding and uploading the most important ABR video links. Nobody comes close. I don’t quite understand why even FOX News and OANN don’t use the material he uncovers. Perhaps “normie” Americans are just tired of seeing riot videos from Portland, Seattle and other cities after more than two months of unrest. Call it “riot fatigue,” perhaps.

Read the entire article here:

Blood Oaths


By Anna Von Reitz

If you ever accepted the Apostle's Creed and took Communion, you have a blood oath,  but chances are, you are too ignorant to know that.    

You just never thought about it that way, but upon any reflection at all, that is the only way to interpret what you've done.   

What else do you do, when you accept the wine in token of his blood?  

By word and deed you have bound yourself to the Creed.  

"I believe in one god, the Father Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord, who was born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified dead and buried....."

And you drank the wine and ate the bread and never thought a single thing beyond that, never recognized the Apostle's Creed as a Blood Oath bound with Communion wine and your own blood, his blood in your blood.  

How stupid can we all be, if this is not apparent?  

How many "good Christians" out there have been thoughtlessly slurping up Communion every Sunday of their lives, and never realized what they were doing?   

Lord, help us, so that we may not perish for our ignorance.... 

Many of the same people out there poking each other in the ribs and whispering, "Hey, be careful with that Anna von Reitz character, she's got a blood oath with the Pope!"  have no idea that they have a blood oath themselves---- and not just with the Pope---with every Believer, of every denomination worldwide, who accepts the Apostle's Creed and takes Communion. 

That's right, all you Methodists are yoked with all you Presbyterians, and the Church of England is cheek and jowl with the Lutherans, the Weslyans, the Nazarenes, and the Full Immersion Community Baptist Temple.  And like it or not, you are yoked to every faithful Catholic and member of the Eastern Orthodoxy, too.  

That's what it means to be "one body" in Christ.  His blood with your blood, your blood with his blood, and with the blood of all those who are sanctified, alive and dead and yet to come.  

Lord, forgive us for being stupid.  We remember your words.  We don't know what we are doing..... help us to wake up and become fully conscious....  

Blood oaths are common as dirt, and you all have plenty of them.  

What do you think marriage is, if not a blood oath?  What do you think all your kids are, but living blood oaths?  Your blood bound to your spouse's blood in living 3-D?  

Lord, give me the patience to endure to the end, all the thoughtless ignorance of this world.....


See this article and over 2600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Hawaii rolling out mandatory COVID-19 testing checkpoints on major Oahu highway

 with mandatory vaccines and quarantine camps soon to follow

Image: Hawaii rolling out mandatory COVID-19 testing checkpoints on major Oahu highway… with mandatory vaccines and quarantine camps soon to follow

(Natural News) The State of Hawaii is turning the H-3 freeway on Oahu into a mandatory COVID-19 road block checkpoint, blocking traffic in both directions and subjecting travelers to mandatory testing, reports Hawaii News Now. It means that Hawaii is being rapidly transformed into a medical police state which will soon morph into mandatory quarantine camps like we’ve already seen rolled out in Australia and New Zealand.

Read the entire article here:

Sunday, August 30, 2020

The Economics of The Other Great Debate - 2.0


By Anna Von Reitz

Meet John Maynard Keynes, the British architect of modern world economic policy, and try not roll your eyes upward toward the blue, blue sky.
The reason I say this is that Keynes came up with a lovely but patently wrong theoretic framework and concept for economic progress in the wake of the Second World War, which involved leveraging assets belonging to the people of this country to provide credit to rebuild all the other countries (Marshall Plan, my ass.) and, here's where it gets hip-wader deep, a constantly and forever expanding world economy.
This was largely based on the presumption that the world's population would continue to expand, and that "perceived needs" could be manipulated and increased via propaganda, to provide such a perennially expanding economy.
This is attractive and exactly what the battered and worn European countries wanted to hear after the Second World War; the American Generals who were sitting on a pile of American assets (garnered from all of us under conditions of Gross Breach of Trust, fraud, and deceit) were ready to invest, and so the deal was done and throughout the world, the name of John Maynard Keynes was heard to resound.
Not so much anymore.
The reason for the failure of Keynesian Economics is as obvious now as it was then:
(1) National and World Economies are the result of beliefs held by, and activities engaged in, by living people, and will forever contract and expand based on changes in those beliefs and activities as well as changes wrought by natural disasters and technological advancements. Read that: a perpetually expanding economy is a pipe dream akin to The Big Rock Candy Mountain.
(2) The Generals were investing money and assets that weren't theirs in investments that amounted to endless Black Holes; once the European nations got access to our credit to rebuild their war damages and pay for their defense, they became a queer combination of dependent and greedy, and wasted no time in "failing their way to success".
The concept of failing one's way to success is best exemplified by the career of General Robert McNamara, whose affable and high-minded personality enabled him to ingratiate himself despite having no talent at all at managing a business, and whose sense of timing enabled him to always exit his disasters right before the ax fell.
In the same way, the nations of Europe that became dependent on American largess in the wake of WWII, deliberately milked it above and beyond any sense or reason, and when they had succeeded in killing the cash cow, beat a hasty retreat and have attempted to wash their hands of the results.
One pregnant example of this is the fact that most European countries have spent 2-4% of their own money on their own defense for the past 75 years, the actual tab being picked up by "the Americans" and charged to us by U.S. Territorial Generals, who were also ---- of course ---- profiting themselves mightily by peddling their services as part of this Round Robin of self-interested fraud on the part of all Parties concerned--- except for the actual Americans who were The Goats.
It wasn't until Donald Trump got a look at this that it was even addressed as an issue. Apparently, we are expected to pay the defense costs of Western Europe and most of the rest of the world for eternity, and this is all part of Keynes' half-baked perpetually expanding theory of world economics.
Sooner or later, reality sets in, and as Margaret Thatcher observed-- other people's money runs out. Endless outflow requires at least an equal endless inflow, or the system consumes itself, and as the European nations and members of the former Commonwealth taught the U.S. Generals--- its hard to get inflow from turnips.
So the expense heaped upon us without our knowledge or consent has bankrupted "the US Incorporated" and "the USA Incorporated" --- both, and what we hear from the Generals is either silence or threats. To all appearances, all they have been able to come up with is another half-baked plan to steal the mineral resources of Third World countries and manipulate currency markets.
Now, everyone is looking at us, the Americans, who weren't consulted about any of this, and who never authorized any such deals, as if any of it were our fault and as if we benefited from any of this fraud and Breach of Trust by our Employees.
The first apparent result is that Keynesian Economics is an Epic Fail, and the admission of this fact is seen in the worldwide "Sustainability" Movement.
Someone, somewhere, most likely at the Vatican, jerked awake in the middle of the night and realized that endless, thoughtless, unbridled expansion of the world population is not a good thing --- even though it is required to keep the Keynesian Model going.
Other Parties realized that the efficacy of generating "felt needs" in the American population via endless advertising and propaganda --- and generating sales as a result --- was not enough. Our gross consumerism couldn't, by itself, keep the Keynes Model pumping iron.
And no matter how many juicy hamburgers and jock straps they inserted into the TV programming, and no matter how much fear they generated to promote more government services, things were topping out.
The Law of Diminishing Returns arrived with a thump on September 11, 2001 and the de facto default on Brady Bonds.
This is by far the most theatrical bond default in history, but what can you expect when Hollywood West and Hollywood East (DC) combine their efforts?
The answer of the U.S. Generals on that occasion was the same as it has always been--- more war, more take-overs, more pillaging of the people and resources of other countries --- to prop up their own service contracts and avoid the looming specter of what they call the "real economy".
For the uninitiated, the "real economy" is where we live; the "false economy" is where they live.
The false economy is generated by an endless supply of paper chits issued as U.S. military script, enforced by legal tender laws, based on American credit and backed by American assets, and all predicated upon the unjustified and unjustifiable presumption that we knew about this and approved of it.
However, these Employees who are supposed to act under a very famous and very public contract -- The Constitution of the United States of America --- are not legally or lawfully enabled to act under self-declared but otherwise non-existent "Emergency Powers" to do any of this, and the other Principals exercising our Delegated Powers "for" us, the Pope, the Queen, and the Lord Mayor of London, are all fully aware of these facts.
It's a con game, and a shameful one; and, though perhaps somewhat necessitated at the beginning by the destruction in Europe and Japan and elsewhere caused by WWII, its continuance and all attempts to blame the American victims of all this "US" finagling "in our names" cannot be justified.
So here we come to rebuilding a new economic paradigm. The answer of the Roman Catholic Church, acting in its profane secular capacity? In a word, "Sustainability"-- full stop, reduce the population dramatically by any means fair or foul, circle the wagons and try to come up with new excuses to claim an ownership interest in living people by using patented DNA and RNA inserted into their natural DNA to turn them all into legally-defined GMO Products.
The Church has done some really odious things in its long struggle to impose worldwide poverty --- their answer to The Other Great Debate --- but this one takes the birthday cake.
We are supposed to be good little cows, and as the motto of the BBC loudly proclaims, "Listen and obey." and meekly accept being bankrupted and oppressed by people on our payroll?
Need we point out that this proposed Second Round is even crazier than John Maynard Keynes?
Not only are the Americans awake now, they have called their actual and properly declared Government into Session to deal with this nonsense. No, we are not remaining silent and complacent. We have been grossly defrauded in Breach of Trust. These criminal acts against a non-combatant civilian population that has been at peace since 1814 cannot be excused as acts of war or waved away as a "mistake" owing no restitution.
Nor can we be induced to "trust" --in any fashion-- those who have brought the world to the brink of this insanity and allow them to act in our behalf or in our names.
We are owed the bulk of everything on this planet and we are not "missing" and cannot be "presumed dead". We are not war-like people, not bent on vengeance; we are far too practical for that, but we do demand fair-minded and practical answers for ourselves and everyone else going forward.
Violence of any kind including weather warfare, lawfare, psyops, civil war, aggression in the Middle East, or aggression against China ---- none of that is justified and we unilaterally oppose it.
It turns out that Jesus has always had the answer, and we have economic models that actually make sense and work, as well as the technology to deliver the benefits to the world. Above and beyond that, our underlying assets and the credit and the profits thereof, belong to us, so we have every right and reason to speak up and tell our employees what we want done.
What we want done is not thus far what they are doing, so unless the other Principals want to be exposed as Hypocrites, Liars, Thieves, Con Artists, Incompetents--- and worse, it's time to direct our Employees according to our Will, and for all of them to fulfill their very public contracts.
We, the actual Americans, shall be securing our assets around the world and taking charge of this nightmare; anyone who wants to oppose us should reflect upon the fact that they are all bankrupt, both in the air and on the sea, and our jurisdiction is the only jurisdiction left that has the assets and insight and ability to sort this madness out without devolving into totalitarianism.
So, if you want abundance and the freedom that goes with it, support us and our actual Government in international jurisdiction, which is our unincorporated Federation of States, doing business since 1776 as The United States of America.
If you want more results from the same "Planners" that brought us to this impasse, support the UN CORP and let them use the United Nations organization as a storefront for ever-increasing criminal activities.


See this article and over 2600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

SHOCK REPORT: This Week CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers

 Only 9,210 Americans Died From COVID-19 Alone – Rest Had Different Other Serious Illnesses

So get this straight – based on the recommendation of doctors Fauci and Birx the US shut down the entire economy based on 9,000 American deaths to the China coronavirus. 

The Other Great Debate 1.0


By Anna Von Reitz

We are familiar with the debate set off by the publication of Darwin's Theory of Evolution, but for well over a hundred years prior to that and continuing to the present, there was another such debate raging.
This Other Great Debate arose in the wreckage of the English Civil War, but unlike the debate over Darwinism which was (and is) a very public discourse, this earlier Great Debate was a different kind of ecclesiastical fistacuffs, touching areas that we were not deemed to be sufficiently interested to engage in public debate.
Listen and decide for yourselves if you are sufficiently interested.
This Other Great Debate centered on the existence of poverty. If God loves us, why does he show so little concern for the millions of impoverished, stunted, and miserable people on this planet? Is God a Deadbeat Dad? Or is there some other hidden meaning or benefit to poverty?
The Creationists (not the same Creationists who have disagreed with the conclusions of Darwin, but a name attached to the proponents in this prior debate, too) looked around at the abundance of the Earth and took the stance that if we were impoverished, it was because of our own bone-headed refusal to do the job that our Creator assigned to Adam. If we would act as better caretakers of God's abundant gifts, and share with each other as Jesus commanded us, then all would be well. Poverty as a systemic problem would disappear. Naturally.
Ben Franklin's irreverent reply is still part of modern culture: "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."
The Opposition, mainly clergy of the Roman Catholic Church, said, but, wait a minute. Our Lord and his Disciples were all mendicants, traveling from town to town, depending on the kindness of others to give them shelter and food. Is this not proof that poverty engenders virtue and is virtuous?
Oddly, after going a few rounds, one discovers that both sides of this argument center around one word: freedom.
There are two ways in which a man can be free. Either he has everything sufficient to support himself and his life and functions in a state of abundance, or, he has nothing, and so, is set free of worldly attachments and concerns.
The Founding Fathers stood with the Creationists and upheld the belief that if we accept "Adam's burdens" and care-taking responsibilities, everything is already divinely set up and ready to produce all the abundance anyone could wish for, and more than enough to provide every man, woman, and child with what they need to live happy and productive lives.
The Roman Catholic Church (and their Holy Roman Empire) took the other tack and adopted "The Doctrine of Scarcity"---attempting to end poverty by deliberately fostering more of it. Their answer to the Other Great Debate was that poverty is virtuous and leads to freedom from worldly cares, so the more poverty, the better.
Are you "burdened down" with your wealth, tired of managing your stock portfolio, yearning to be free of such responsibilities? The Church will take that burden from you, in exchange for food, shelter, and basic medical care.
Enter the modern welfare system and the schmarmy dark world of "social engineering".
In the process of relieving millions upon millions of people of their worldly goods, the Church has become unimaginably wealthy, has created the modern welfare state, and wittingly or unwittingly, also created a system of enslavement to the Church--- because when people are dependent upon you for food, shelter, and medical aid, not to mention, supposedly, the fate of their eternal souls, you exercise immense coercive power over them.
As usual, what started out as good intentions and scripture-based logic on the part of Catholic clergy three centuries ago, has led straight to Hell. While the Doctrine of Scarcity has led to social welfare via a different route than communism, it has had much the same result---- deprivation, suppression of individual motivation and initiative, and misuse of coercive power.
What of the other side of the argument?
We have mixed results. The Founding Fathers were correct that the Earth is more than abundant enough to support us all and provide abundance for everyone. Unfortunately, the moral and educational basis behind their original concept was never brought forward into the popular consciousness. Instead, the opportunity they created was seized upon by Robber Barons.
These men did not embrace the concept of Adam's care-taking role, much less did they embrace Jesus's concept of sharing the benefit of mutually owned resources; instead, these Robber Barons sought possession and control of natural resources for their own profit -- the more exclusive the control and the more monopolized, the better.
Thus we have the specter of giant mining operations in which resources belonging to the entire nation are stripped and used to profit a few, transportation that is controlled and monopolized for profit-taking, electrical and water and waste management utilities that are similarly monopolized for exercise of coercive power and the profit of a few, medical and pharmaceutical industries that are centered on profit instead of health, and so on.
As the only goal of these men and their corporations was profit for themselves and their shareholders, society has suffered as a whole and the Earth has suffered, too.
The Founders were right about our ability to create abundance, but the moral imperative for doing so --- and the envisioned end result, freedom, was lost in the shuffle.
Nobody on the street understood that freedom was the goal and that the creation of abundance was merely a mechanism to create freedom via abundance for Mankind as a whole.
The other part of the Founder's vision was that we could, with sufficient initiative, easily provide ourselves with ample largess, enabling us to support the weak, the old, the sick, the mentally infirm, orphans, and others unable to support themselves -- not with coercive institutionalized welfare, but with love.
In a world of abundance, there is no need to feel burdened by the poor, the young, the old, or the sick. Rather, once set free of the hard-scrabble, we are also set free to open our hearts and to care for those in need in our communities on a private basis.
The Founders took it for granted that from whatever religious or ethnic or racial background we came from, we would at least have the moral and ethical motivation to take care of our own and share our resources within our own communities. Our republican form of government supports and expedites this outcome, by allowing us to marshal both our public and private resources in pursuit of the Public Good.
After 350 years, the results are in and have yet to be tabulated.
Contestant Number One, the Roman Catholic Church through its secular institutions, including the United Nations and its megalomaniac UN CORP, standing for institutionalized poverty, cradle to grave welfare state, the end of private property, universal pauperism, coercive power wielded by the Church using forced dependency and control of access to food, water, shelter, money, and other resources to compel obedience to whatever the Church aka UN planners want.
Contestant Number Two, the American Dream Team, through their individual efforts, vision of freedom through abundance, community spirit, and common sense and enterprise ---- salted down with much-needed control over corporations and a refurbishing of corporate goals and management objectives worldwide. Continuance of private property and private enterprise, community-based welfare, local control of natural resources, and self-governance.
You are the judges. You get to decide the outcome of the Other Great Debate.


See this article and over 2600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.