By Anna Von Reitz
Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.
Monday, August 21, 2023
By Anna Von Reitz
Thanks to a lot of recent misinformation, slander, and other hostile activities, some people are writing in and asking to cancel their affiliations with TASA.
The answer to this request and all others like it is simply to inform the person making the request that you cannot change a public record that they created and that all original documents should have already been returned to them.
If they wish to change their political status back to that of a British Territorial U.S. Citizen or to that of a Municipal franchise CITIZEN, all they need to do is to send a notarized copy of their renunciation of American State National/ State Citizen status, and they will be considered "stateless" from now on and not owed any consideration from, or as a result of, being born in a State of the Union.
You may charge a nominal fee for recording their renunciation or your Assembly may choose to do it for free.
We urge everyone to think carefully about it -- and whether or not they have a natural allegiance to the British Monarch or the Pope that would dictate such a choice, because renunciation of one's estate as an American represents a serious loss of Constitutional Guarantees and property interests.
It is, nonetheless, up to each individual.
They can notify the appropriate District Assembly by attending their District Assembly meetings or registering to vote in their District Assembly elections.
By Anna Von Reitz
The uttermost irony is that our American Government's structure was a gift from the French Catholics and the American Indians. Not British Yeoman.
The principal portion of the British contribution lies in The Mayflower Compact and the outgrowth of the Community Assembly as a means of establishing self-governance, first for the Colonies, and later, for the States.
People never think about the weighty contributions of the French and generally don't know that we copied the principles of the Iroquois League of Nations when setting up our government of many nation-states.
People also don't typically see the direct connection between the French and Indian War and The War of Independence twenty years later, either, but it is as present and obvious as it ever was.
The War of Independence can be viewed as an outgrowth of The French and Indian War, with the principle issues centered around land ownership. westward expansion, and treaty obligations owed by the British Monarch -- not "freedom" nor "liberty" nor the birth of any singular "new nation".
We can just as well say that King George III and Cousin George Washington, between them, settled the French and Indian War to their mutual benefit, and count the acquisition of land under our own name as a benefit we always have to defend.
Just as we owe the name of our country to the French Armoricans, we owe the most distinctive features of our American Government, especially our separation of nationality apart from citizenship, to them.
They were the original Authors of the principles that make men free; we were the happy beneficiaries of their long struggles against Ceasars, Popes and Kings.
It all hinges on one exceptional idea: that one could be a member of a nation, and not be a citizen.
That is, one could simply be a Frenchman, and owe no involuntary allegiance to a king -- without being a traitor to one's country.
You could be a peaceable man, mind your own business, and live your own life without politics or prejudice of any kind.
Herein lies the right to be left alone, the right to privacy, the right to say "no" to forced press-ganging and conscription, the right to say "no" to military occupation and confiscation of private property.
Then, as now, the excuse for these evils was "safety", but to the "jus soli", the men of the soil, as the Romans called them, it didn't matter if the illegal takings resulted from the activities of foreign mercenaries or those of their own government.
They universally preserved the right to say, "No."
They passed that right on to us as part of our heritage.
To this day, the inherent rights of the soil predominate and preserve the rights of our nation.
This is why The United States, which is the proper name of our country among the nations, stands above The United States of America in national affairs, while The United States of America, predominates in international affairs.
Together, they represent the soil jurisdiction of our combined nation-states (The United States) and the international jurisdiction of the land and sea (The United States of America) we are heir to.
Another way to put this is that The United States is the realm of the living people, while The United States of America is the realm of our Lawful Persons on the land and our Legal Persons on the sea.
In English, there is no separate style convention separating a soil jurisdiction State from a land jurisdiction State. Nebraska can act in either capacity and is a State, either way.
Recently there has been another flap over whether our "states" use small "s" or a capital "S" with some people passionately believing that this is "the key" to unraveling the fraud against us.
I suppose that, in a way, it is, because it reveals the existence of the two foreign Federal Subcontractors, one British, one Roman, both operating out of the District of Columbia, and communicating in foreign Codes.
Latin designates the soil jurisdiction with a small "s" and the international land jurisdiction with a capital "S" -- which is confusing, because our official language is English, not Latin. However, Latin was, the official language of the Holy Roman Empire and its Successor, the City of Rome, and our Municipal Subcontractors have continued to use Latin language style conventions and grammar mixed with English words, to create a "Pig Latin" version.
This conundrum was addressed by the Federal Republic Congress in 1851 and it was agreed that from then on, the soil jurisdiction of this country would bear the name "The United States" and the international jurisdiction, both on land and at sea, would be recognized as "The United States of America", in deference to English.
The Municipal United States Congress, as a foreign government run by the Holy See at that point in history, adopted the Latin convention, and continued to call this country "the United States" and to use "the United States of America" to designate our respective national and international personas.
They also used Latin conventions to designate the "states" and "people" as part of the soil jurisdiction, and "States" and "People" to designate the Lawful Persons occupying our international land jurisdiction and the Legal Persons occupying our international jurisdiction of the sea.
You will note that it was the Lawful People of this country (State Citizens) acting in international jurisdiction, who were the Principals able to create and enforce the Federal Constitutions.
English uses "state" when we are not talking about a specific state, as in, "The states agreed to mount a mutual defense." which only adds to the confusion. It also uses "State" to denote a specific State, as in, "Nebraska is a State of the Union." -- which takes the confusion between English and Latinized English to a new level.
To be fair, "Latinized English", a version of "Pig Latin" is gobbledygook owed no notice; when you combine grammar from one language and use it with words from another language, the result is often unintelligible or, it becomes a code as in, Administrative Code and Municipal Code, which is what the Municipal Subcontractor uses to befuddle every issue.
If you pay attention to their pronouncements, and don't know the linguistic history, you--- as an English-speaker, would naturally swear to God that "the" United States of America was the name of our lawful American Government operating in international jurisdiction---- and not the name of a British Territorial corporation in near-perennial bankruptcy.
The British Territorial Subcontractor, which is structured as a Municipal Corporation (subject to the Pope) has its own English variation, which they call "Federal Code". This foreign government uses strict English conventions throughout, except that it also uses "legal terms" and jargon to obscure its meaning. For example, the Territorial Congress in the 1860's declared, arbitrarily, and out of a blue sky, that for their Federal Code purposes, the word "person" would henceforth mean "corporation".
The accumulation of such particular and peculiar legal definitions makes Federal Code a Secret Code, too.
So, here we have two foreign Municipal Corporations, both ultimately belonging to the Pope, one administered by the City of Rome and operating under Roman Civil Law using Pig Latin as a secret language called "Municipal Code" and another administered by a British Crown Municipal Corporation that uses English -- but English that is tweaked and perverted by legal terms and definitions into what it calls "Federal Code" ---and neither species of "Code" is American English.
The codes only look like American English and sound like American English.
The Municipal Administrators went so far in their attempts to obscure the meaning and derivation of their Pig Latin version of English, as to redefine the meaning of "American Sign Language" to explain away their use of all capital-letters -- a Latin convention with a bad history.
In Latin, the patriarchs and patricians use names in all small letters: flavius josephus.
The public servants use upper and lower case names: Ceasar Augustus.
The slaves, both public and private, use all capital letters: FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS.
Thus, in Latin, the style indicates the social status of the individual entity connected to the name, but you have to know Latin to know this.
Only about 20% of Catholics still retain this knowledge today, and a handful of scholars like myself who have had cause to delve into such things.
Joe Average American has no way of interpreting it, nor protesting it, when he sees his name styled like this: ALAN B ANDERSON.
He has no way of knowing that he has just been identified as a Municipal Corporation Franchise --- and a slave.
The answer to the question Big "S" or Little "s" is that it can only be derived from context and knowing which foreign Federal Subcontractor you are dealing with.
In Municipal parlance, a small "s" applied to "state" means soil jurisdiction. In Federal-ese small "s" applied to "state" means it is a general noun. In Municipal parlance, a capital "S" indicates international jurisdiction and can be either land or sea. In Federal-ese a capital "S" indicates a specific Proper Noun.
The further answer is that we have declared our Official Language to be Common English and we are not responsible for knowing or using Federal Code or Municipal Code, either one.
So, whether you are talking to a Magistrate or a Territorial District Judge, you are well-within your rights to say, "I don't know or speak in coded languages and so, I ask the court to speak to me in Common English and receive my answers in Common English, if that's accepted?"
If it is "accepted" you are guaranteed no booby-traps.
If it is not accepted, you can sit on your heels and ask for an unbiased interpreter.
From what I understand from reading it he is trying to fast track development. He suspended the laws regarding historical and burial sites and came up with new rules of procedure.
By Anna Von Reitz
Opinions, suppositions, theories, assertions, allegations, blah-blah-blah --- none of that counts.
You have to search for the Truth. You have to work at it and care about it and test it.
The last several weeks I have had hit pieces lobbed at me from The Reign of the Heavens Society and its members, and from the so-called Jural Assembly Movement that thinks you can just go out and call yourselves a "jural assembly" and do whatever you want.
Their favorite epithet is, "That's a lie!" but they have no reason to say that and no proof against me.
I have given them all the information they need to look up Primary Sources and prove what I am saying for themselves.
Ron Vrooman's latest is to assert that there is no Federation of States --- the American Federation of States that the Federal Government is named after and obligated to. He says it doesn't exist.
He found obscure references to "The United States of America, Incorporated" ---a British Crown forerunner to the Scottish Interloper, and was confused into thinking that our Federation of States was a British Corporation subsumed by The Articles of Confederation.
That's like mistaking a giraffe for a dog.
So I told him where to look to disprove his own theory. This isn't the first time I told him precisely where to look. He has had it in his hands for three years and I just gave it to him again.
I built my "narrative" on Primary Sources. Anyone who thinks otherwise, better think again.
Ironically, by their own actions, these people are choosing to lie --- not only about me, but about history, and our actual government, too.
The whole Reign of the Heavens scheme is also tied up in impersonating the Federation of States as a British Crown Corporation--- and that's probably no accident. It's the same old schtick of using a corporation called "The United States of America" Incorporated, to steal the identity of the Federation of States and access our credit.
That's why they went to India to incorporate another version of the same old ruse. Every time we track them down and force them to shut down their look-alike, sound-alike corporation, they have a hissy fit and I face a firestorm of slander and lies.
Well, here's a suggestion for the Liars in our midst--- stop trying to impersonate our States and our Federation of States.
Stop trying to substitute our States using foreign States-of-States and State Trusts to "represent" them. Our States of the Union are in Session. Stop pretending that we are not present. Stop pretending that we are incompetent.
Stop pretending to be us and stop impersonating our lawful government. Stop trying to access our credit without our agreement. Stop infringing upon our names and trademarks. Stop trying to impose undisclosed and unconscionable contracts. Stop using "courts" as private collection agencies.
Just quit. Give it up. You've been found out. Your Due Process has come and gone. Your Breach of Trust, your criminality, and your shame is all hung out to dry, and whatever else comes, you can be sure that you won't be able to pull off the same old schtick again.
Trying to discredit me, telling more lies about me, slandering me, gossiping yourselves silly ---won't change a thing. The records say what they say and the records are distributed worldwide.
Numbers don't matter. All we need are two people to stand up and inherit each State of the Union, so don't think this is a popularity contest or political campaign. We don't need a majority of "voters" and we don't live "under" any Constitution.
We are the honest-to-God Americans owed every jot of every Constitutional Guarantee and service obligation ever written and mutually agreed to in this country.
We know who we are, and we're not confused about a single thing. We know, for sure, that our government is not and has never been vested in any British Crown corporation. Period.
Our standing is solid and long-established. Our commercial claims are cured. Our courts of general jurisdiction are present already in many States and more are ready to launch.
Only the Truth counts in the end, though it may be obscured, though it may be ignored and misinterpreted and bypassed for 160 years, when it comes shining through, there's nothing else like it and no way around it.
I have told the Truth and acted with Honor, and that will be apparent to everyone on Earth in short order.
So I will simply say, hold fast to truth, hold fast to love, and you will not be denied; though your sins be as scarlet....
This marks the end of "the Great Tribulation", that is, the payment of "tribute" to the Empires of Britain and Rome.
We have exercised our beneficial interest as Donors.
See: Ecclesiastical Law, Volume 1, pgs 53-54, and the "Secret" Treaty of 1213 by which "King" John ceded his kingdom --- which didn't include a scrap of England, Ireland, Scotland, or Wales --- to Pope Innocent. John became a Vassal and the Overseer of the Pope's Commonwealth land.
Everything has been operated under conditions of fraud and deceit ever since the Magna Carta and all the recent efforts to overturn the Magna Carta and the Law of the Land, generally, are sponsored by the same lackeys trying to obscure the Truth about our American Government.
But in the end, only the Truth counts.