American Public Announcement: What Applies to You? ---And Doesn't?

 By Anna Von Reitz

As always, it is a matter of discerning which "law" applies to you -- or doesn't apply to you.  People have been contacting me, alarmed by new regulations being imposed by the "Corporate Transparency Act" (CTA) as of next Monday, January 1, 2023. 

This Act, like all legislative Acts, pertains only to federal business entities, corporate officials, and corporate employees. 

Are you a "federal" corporate business entity, corporate official, or corporate employee?  

Let's look at the actual list of who is liable for these new business reporting requirements: 

The CTA impacts federal reporting entities, corporations, limited liability companies, limited business partnerships, business trusts, and similar entities that are created or registered by filing documentation with a State of State Secretary of State or Indian Tribal Office.  (Indian Tribal Offices are also under the British-connected Federal Municipal System.) 

CTA does not include unincorporated, unregistered, unlicensed, and exempted businesses that have not sought public bankruptcy protection or similar limited liability benefits, and therefore are not public entities. 

It does include non-profits and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that have filed paperwork with any State of State Secretary of State or registered their organizations as franchise corporations with any State of State Division of Banking and Commerce, etc. 

Bottom line, if you have been unwise enough to incorporate your business enterprises and sought "benefits" for your business from the Public, and then used layers of interlocking trusts and other mechanisms to hide your business relationships, launder money, collude in illegal asset protection schemes, and dodge taxes --- you are in a heap of trouble, boy.  

As of January 1, 2024, you have to report on your business relationships, ownership interests, etc., to FinCen, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, of the U.S. Department of Treasury (note, this is not the same as the U.S. Department of the Treasury, LOL). 

As of this past week, you were in a heap of trouble, anyway, as your corporations are basically dissolved if they were in any way attached to the British Empire --and most of the corporations in America were, because since the Civil War when the Corporation Craze started in America, the State of State organizations have all been British Territorial Government operations. 

Read that -- unknown to you, your post-Civil War Corporations created in America have all been registered or otherwise documented and created by a British Territorial Secretary of State's Office, not an American Secretary of State's Office. 

This goes back to the great Substitution Fraud that occurred right after the Civil War, when the British Territorial Government (which was one of our three Federal Subcontractors) declared a "state of emergency" and shoe-horned -- under force and color of law -- the people of each State to create new "State of State Constitutions" providing a service contract for British Territorial State of State organizations to come in and substitute for the American State of State organizations that existed prior to the Civil War.   

Prior to the Civil War, our State services were provided by American purveyors operated as, for example, The State of Florida.  After the above described maneuver, the same services were provided by British Territorial purveyors operated as, for example, the State of Florida.  

The only difference that a person on the street could observe would be a change from "The" to "the", new signage, and some new personnel.  

All these organizations and all the organizations created by or registered by these and similar British-connected corporations (this probably means you, if you are an American corporation, limited liability company, yada-yada formed in this country after 1860) have been dissolved and their assets entered into receivership as of last week. 

So while reporting under the requirements of the CTA may have posed yet another reporting expense ---and if you were colluding, evading, or entangling in improper ways --- possible fines and other regulatory unpleasantness, there are bigger fish to fry. 

Don't worry about CTA or even the U.S. Department of Treasury. Worry about hauling your rumps and assets out of the flaming dogpile. 

The only way you can do this is by lawfully converting your corporate business operations -- that is, voluntarily "nationalizing" your corporations to stand under the Law of the Land and the auspices of your American Government still standing on the land and soil of your country. 

Otherwise, your companies are unincorporated chattel assets, unprotected and liable for all the "public debts" run up against private assets for the past three centuries. 

This is because, ever since Queen Anne, the Brits have been operating their Monarchy as a shell game.  The Throne of England has stood vacant for three centuries, and that is a real problem, because in order to charter or register corporations -- a government must hold its sovereignty on the Land and Soil. 

And yes, the Poo rolls downhill.  Because their Majesties haven't been operating in the proper Office and capacity and under the correct form of Law, they haven't had the power to create or register corporations this entire time.  

As a result, all the corporations formed under the auspices of Great Britain and the UK and most American Corporations, too, (because of the Substitution Scheme described above) stand dissolved and their assets are claimed by our unincorporated Federation of States, as the Preferential Creditor still standing. 

Under such a circumstance, former British Corporations, like their unwitting "American affiliates", may choose to lawfully convert their operations as American Corporations standing on the land jurisdiction of The United States of America.  

Intent to function lawfully from now on may be established by a vote of the Board of Directors, Board of Governors, or other duly seated corporation officers. So long as they honor this expressed intent they will be given a reasonable amount of time to restructure and lawfully convert their operations. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                 In care of Box 520994

                 Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 28th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

This Just About Says it All

 

International Public Notice: One Good Fact v A Lot of Bad Law

 By Anna Von Reitz

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals

We paraphrase the title of this Notice from a reader-researcher-correspondent who responded to our recent appeal for research assistance:

"The last actual monarch of England was Queen Anne, who reigned from 1702 until 1714. She was the last monarch of the House of Stuart and the last English monarch to date who was not also monarch of Scotland."

However, the continued practice of the Coronation seems to say otherwise; Kings and Queens of England have continued to be crowned "as" Kings and Queens of England --- haven't they?  

Queen Elizabeth II certainly seemed to be taking the Coronation Vows of the Queen of England during her televised 1953 Coronation, but as Regina v JAH (John Anthony Hill) proved, within three days she severed that Social Contract, breaking it and leaving the English Throne vacant throughout the rest of her long career.  

She didn't sit on the Throne of England for seventy years; she sat on The Chair of the Estates, instead. 

So, knowing this we've been poking at the belly of the Beast and have confirmed among other things that neither the present King Charles III nor King Charles of Scotland ever took the Coronation Vows to be Kings of the land and soil of their respective countries. 

That is, they never entered General Jurisdiction and somehow magically just popped up to reign on the sea and in the air with no legs on dry land at all.  

People have assumed that it is possible to be both King of England and Scotland, but "no man can serve two masters". 

Instead, what appears to have happened, is an aberration of Nature and a gross violation of the public's trust in both England and Scotland, as well as Ireland and Wales later on. 

The people living in these countries have gone on believing in the existence of a King of England sitting on the Throne of England, and as we have seen, there has been considerable investment --- Elizabeth II's entire "for show" Coronation, for example --- in continuing this charade for public consumption, but.... sometime during the reign of Queen Anne, she became a "Corporate Queen" operating in the jurisdiction of the sea and owing her service to a Legal Fiction, not a living Kingdom populated by men and women. 

This counts as one of the longest-running fraud schemes in history, and stands as a stunning example of corporate guile employed against the living people who have relied upon what they reasonably believed to be their Christian King or Queen, to protect them and uphold their law.  

King Charles III and King Charles of Scotland are both "legless" having either vacated or never occupied the actual thrones of England or Scotland, either one --- and it appears that this has been the practice of their Predecessors for the past 300 years.  

They kept up appearances without actually being Kings of England or Scotland --- which means they have all been nothing more or less than glorified CEOs, operating apart from the land and soil of their respective countries. 

It also means that everything they have "signed into law" for the past 300 years is either void for fraud (most likely) or legislation that applies only to public employees.  

It means that all the "wars" they have engaged in from the time of Queen Anne forward have been Mercenary Conflicts only euphemistically called "wars". 

And that means that all the "war reparations" they have collected since The War of the Spanish Succession have been collected under False Pretenses and conditions of illegal confiscation.  

This also explains their ability to amass vast fortunes for the conduct of these wars, as they have been able to engage the backing of private banks and industrialist cronies acting as war profiteers in wars for profit, instead of relying on the public purse --- at least, that has been the case during the "wars".  

In each case an umbrella corporation was formed to act as a sort of clearinghouse for war-related purchases and disbursements.  In the Second World War, this umbrella corporation in America was the U.S. Corp.  Immediately after the "war" ended, this umbrella was folded up and bankrupted as a result of its surplus investments, and the cost of this was transferred to the unwitting American Public. 

This is just one example of how letting the supposed monarchs operate in this manner has promoted corruption and harm to the public they are supposed to serve, encouraged wars-for-profit, cronyism, elitism, unjust enrichment, and has ultimately given rise to their effort to establish a form of Corporate Feudalism, in which their corporations would literally own living people like farmyard animals and dispose of them accordingly. 

It should now be apparent to everyone reading this why a King must be held accountable to the people of his country and must sit on the Throne of his country and be responsible under the Law of the Land and Soil, before he has the right to charter or register any form of business entity.  

This, then, also explains how and why all the Municipal and Territorial Corporations -- and their franchises -- created and administered by "King" Charles III and "King" Charles of Scotland and all of their Predecessors back to Queen Anne, have been foreclosed upon by their Preferential Creditor, The United States of America --- our unincorporated Federation of States. 

None of these corporations except those that can prove that they were formed properly and lawfully prior to Queen Anne or under the auspices of Queen Anne prior to her quiet abdication of the Throne of England, have any right to exist.  

The authority that a country has to charter and register corporations derives from the Land and Soil Jurisdiction, and without a Sovereign on the Land and Soil, no such authority exists.  

As a result, all these later corporations from HSBC in Hong Kong to JB's Fish 'N Chips, Inc., are undone; the venerable Bank of England, formed in 1694 to fund the Government, most likely still holds water-- but beginning sometime during Queen Anne's Administration, there is no valid authority in place to create corporations. 

Everything that has gone on since then has been unlawful by definition, and a merely legal existence is not sufficient. 

Put another way, "Great Britain" is a Legal Fiction, but the Kingdom of England is a Lawful Person; it follows that the "King of Great Britain" is a Legal Person, whereas the "King of England" is a Lawful Person.  

Legal Persons do not have the power to self-generate. 

Thus all these corporations that have been formed for the last 300 years in England and in the Union and the Commonwealth, and all their franchises formed in other countries, including most of the members of the World Economic Forum -- are void.

"Lost at sea." 

They now represent a vast pile of unincorporated chattel assets claimed by the Preferential Creditor, our unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America.

The only option to unravel this Mess is for all these corporations to undergo lawful conversion, that is, "nationalization" and come back under the Law of the Land in their respective countries. 

The only way for England to proceed is through the authority and claims of the Hereditary Lord High Steward, Ivan Talbot, and the only way for him to form a lawful government is to call a meeting of the Heirs of the Norman Settlement --- something that hasn't been done on a voluntary basis since they signed The Magna Carta. 

This may seem extreme, but when you are dealing with corporate mischief and malfeasance going back 300 years at the Highest Levels of Government in the western world, extreme measures are called for. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                 In care of: Box 520994

                 Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 28th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.