Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

The Long and Short of It All -- Part 2


By Anna Von Reitz

All you currently active duty and reserve and retired United States Marines out there--  what was it you were shouting every day of your Marine training?  

Was it, "I am an American!" --- or was it, "I am a United States Citizen!"? 

All you United States Army guys --- which one are you?  

This same question applies to the Air Force, the Navy, even the Coast Guard.  

The answer determines whether you are an American and an honorable member of the American Armed Forces  or you are acting in the capacity of a filthy commercial mercenary -- albeit, not getting the big bucks of merc wages.

Did anyone ever tell you that when you signed up to enter military service you were enrolled as a mercenary in the employment of commercial corporations
and given a share in the profits via a stock portfolio?  No?  

Here It Is AGAIN for All Those Who Need to Know


By Anna Von Reitz

There is a widespread swath of gross ignorance in America populated by True Believers who think that they know all they need to know and devil take the hindmost. 

No doubt that is comforting to them and they cling to their suppositions accordingly, like Linus clinging to his Blanket. 

---Until, that is, they land in a "US District Court" and are told that they have no constitutional guarantees and other wake up calls come due. 

For all of those who think that I am a "Patriot Guru" and that I can't possibly know what I am talking about despite the abundant factual and actual proof that I do (admittedly not paying federal income tax since 1998, for example) here is a compilation of primary source quotes from people as diverse as Frederick Douglas and JFK in support of the information I am giving you---300 pages worth: 

https://www.scribd.com/document/100879878/We-The-Sheeple-Vs-the-Banksters

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The Long and Short of All of It


By Anna Von Reitz

Either these people are: (a) my employees, owing me good faith service, or (b) they are foreign commercial mercenaries trespassing upon me and engaging in inland piracy.
In the first case, they are obligated to honor and protect my person and property. That is the only credible reason for any government to exist.
In the second case, they are pirates and every anti-piracy law ever created kicks into gear, including the international treaties that directly obligate both the Holy Sea and the British Monarch and their respective organizations to protect my person and property.
Read that: Checkmate.

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The [Municipal] United States Corporation -- a Lesson About Larry Becraft


By Anna Von Reitz

Here's a good example of how attorneys deliberately avoid and obscure the actual truth and substance of things.   Larry finds an obscure reference somewhere in my writings to the Act of 1871.  It was probably a quote from someone else or part of a list of historical actions undertaken by Congress --- he doesn't say, so it's impossible to know where he picked this bit up, whether it is in context or not, but he quotes it as something I referenced: 

Larry:  

Contrary to your present denial, I have specifically quoted an article you wrote that was posted on Crackpot Arnie's website, which is as follows:

Claim 15. 1871: The Corporate Congress begins to set up shop for itself by creating a separate government for the District of Columbia.  The initial effort fails but seven years later the Washington DC Municipality is created as an independent international city state run as a plenary oligarchy by the members of “Congress”.   Also in 1871, the Corporate Congress claimed to own all United States corporations— 41st “Congress”– Third Session, Chapters 62, 63, 64, and 65.

Anna: 

Yes, Larry, Congress did do exactly what I said it did and what a lot of other patriots have said it did --- the fact that the unpopularity of their action forced them to repeal the original Act three years later, and caused them to cut it up and pass its substance in a piecemeal fashion in 1878 -- is the kind of hair-splitting and deliberate avoidance of the basic truth that does you no credit. 

Here for your education --- AGAIN --- is the entire, truthful history of the Act of 1871: 

1871 - Act of 1871 ---“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 ---which was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions---- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)).

It doesn't really matter, Larry, that the original Act was repealed and then passed in pieces later --- what matters is the substance of the Act, which is apparently what you wish to avoid and gainsay: the creation of the US Corp.  

And it can only be the creation of the US Corp that we are looking at, Larry, because: the District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, so there was no need to do that in 1871 or 1874 or 1878.  

Statehood is a Capacity


By Anna Von Reitz

It really does not matter for the purposes of the Federal Union that Texas came in as a "republic" or a "territory" or a "colony" either --- Texas agreed to act as a State of the Federal Union.  

Being a "State" is a capacity --- for example, you might agree to act in the capacity of an elector, or in the capacity of a wife, or in the capacity of employee in a book store.  

In the same way the Body Politic of Texas can act as an independent republic, a State Republic, a State, or a State of State, or a Council of County Governments or, or, or. 

Having agreed, Texas joined the Union and has been part of the Union as a member-State ever since.  If it joined some other Union it might be called a "region" or a "borough" or a "principality".  

So in its own internal affairs, Texas functions as a republic--- as all the State Republics are supposed to (though largely don't) and with respect to its relationship with the other States functions as a State of the Federal Union.