Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9370 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Friday, December 6, 2019

About Us Working With Karen Hudes

By Anna Von Reitz

Editors note: This should have been published on December 3rd. but I must have missed the article.
Paul Stramer

Karen Hudes is a flack for the World Bank— but this statement requires analysis of what the “World Bank” is. It’s a bank of banks, controlled by bankers from all over the world.
So what happens when the World Bank does things that endanger or offend the member banks?
If things get bad enough and the implications liability-wise are clear enough, those member banks that stand to lose the most will need a “whistle blower” to dampen down the improper actions being taken by the World Bank.
The same scenario could develop within the World Bank itself. The Directors could find themselves being outgunned and out-maneuvered by several very powerful member banks —in effect, forced to do immoral or illegal things and left to take the blame for it.
Enter Karen Hudes.
That is the kind of “Whistle blower” she is— not the brave, lonely figure alerting the world to criminal wrong-doing, but the Insider being employed to blow the whistle because internal organizational control mechanisms aren’t working.
You might think of her as the person being paid to pull the emergency brake on a runaway train.
So, she’s certainly not an enemy of the World Bank. She still indirectly works for them and so, last time I looked, does her husband. She was, in fact, taking action to help at least some factions within the World Bank and most likely, her activities stem from the second scenario— that is, most likely she was working for some of the directors of the World Bank to save the World Bank.
My beef with Karen is that she either doesn’t know or chooses not to tell the truth about the American issues. She misrepresents American history and does so in a way that undermines efforts to settle accounts.
And why that is?
She has spent her life in Europe and even many Americans who grew up and stayed in this country for a lifetime don’t know their own history, so it is completely plausible and even likely that she simply doesn’t know that she is misrepresenting what went on here.
It could also be that she knows the history and is — again —- protecting the World Bank.
The World Bank has reasons why it does not want to hear about what it owes Americans.
For starters—
1. We know that FDR collected by his own admission 20,000 tons of privately held American gold. We know that 6,000 tons of that was used to capitalize the Federal Reserve System, and 14,000 tons was used as a bankruptcy guarantee for the other Secondary Creditors—- the World Bank and IBRD (International Bank of Reconstruction and Development).
We know this gold stash was used as a collateral guarantee backing both the World Bank and IBRD as a result. We also know that when the bankruptcy of “the” United States of America, Incorporated was finally settled in November of 1999— that gold was not returned to the Americans.
World Bank and IBRD claimed it as “abandoned assets” —-and made no attempt to contact us and return the assets to the lawful heirs—- the living people of this country.
I have a problem with that.
It’s bad enough that they had the free use of our assets as collateral for 66 years without our consent and even worse that FDR stole our assets at gunpoint in the first place—- which they also had cause to know—- without adding injury to insult by purloining the assets once the bankruptcy was over.
We want the 14,000 tons of American gold returned to the lawful government of this country, to be returned for the direct benefit of the heirs of those it was stolen from.
It’s just simple law and decency. If your Grandmother was forced at gunpoint to “donate” her wedding ring, you’d feel the same way I do. It’s not even the thought of any riches. It’s the thought of justice and property being returned to the lawful heirs and owners.
Second Bone to Pick—-
Upward of $21 trillion dollars' worth of credit owed to Americans is also owed by the banks —and the World Bank and its members certainly have cause to know this.
The “system” adopted in 1913 and completely implemented in 1934 is a debt-credit system using a private military script I.O.U. known as the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE — FRN’s, as currency.
Like any other “Note” this is just a piece of paper promising to pay at some later date.
But to be legal there has to be a redemption date and there is none published on these notes—- why?
Because the debt was transferred to Treasury Bonds that are issued in tranches and paid off on specific dates —to the purported investors, the Federal Reserve Banks.
But are the Federal Reserve Banks the actual investors?
No. They are just a bunch of check kiters, illegal securities brokers, and crooks.
The American States and People are the actual investors— again, at gun point, forced to “invest” by Legal Tender Laws.
So let’s look a little deeper at the actual situation.
They are using debt as legal tender which results in what is known as a debit-credit system.
I give you an I.O.U. and you give me a hamburger.
Have I paid you for the hamburger?
I have promised to pay you back sometime in the future.
In this way the “US National Debt” accumulated, and so also did the American National Credit.
All the Americans who exchanged their actual labor and actual hamburgers for I.O.U.s are owed pre-paid credit for every penny of the US National Debt.
Plus interest.
This is a fact that none of the banks want to face, because they all benefited from using this credit that was in fact owed to us. They purloined it, leveraged it, invested it, cashiered it away so that we couldn’t have any direct benefit from it, and now, they don’t want to admit what they did and return it.
In fact, they can’t return it, but they could make a good faith effort to benefit the people they wronged by carrying through on the promised remedy passed by their Congress back in 1934, and honoring a system of Mutual Offset Credit Exchange Exemption, which the miscreants never actually disclosed to the public or fully implemented.
In a MOCEE system both parties owe each other debts.
In this case, we owe them for government services and they owe us for the goods, services, credit, etc., that they receive from us—- so we simply agree to “offset” our debts.
I owe you $10, you owe me $100, so we agree that henceforth, I owe you nothing and your debt to me is reduced to $90.
If the rats had simply carried through and made this available to the Americans, the US Debt would have been kept in check and never “blossomed” into a $21 trillion dollar behemoth. Plus interest.
Now the “US” Corporations, including the Federal Reserve System, responsible for this theft and embezzlement of pre-paid credit owed to the Americans, applied for and received bankruptcy protection because of the bogus “US National Debt” that should have been offset —but clearly, this was all predicated on fraud and embezzlement of credit owed to us, so that no bankruptcy protection should have been allowed.
Those who benefited from this theft and who protected the perpetrators—- the Pope and the Queen—- remain on the stick for it, but all the banks worldwide benefited, so Karen’s buddies at the World Bank are squeezing their knees together, too.
It’s an absolutely staggering amount of pre-paid credit that was extracted from us and the interest owed on it has taken on a life of its own.
The pre-paid American National Credit is the elephant in the downstairs bathroom.
We know that they can never pay us back in actual fact, but they can begin to make amends by doing what they agreed to do in the first place. They need to be authorizing Mutual Offset Credit Exchange Exemptions for all Americans, allowing us to offset all public debts.
In real time that means that we would be able to offset mortgage payments (which are public debt, not private—but that’s another story), college loans, utility payments, and various other bills.
This could be done simply by issuing a special purpose credit card.
In this way, Americans would finally obtain relief and the Perpetrators would finally be paying some of their own bills and nobody would have to go broke over it.
So far, they are trying tooth and nail to obscure and cover up the facts, but both the history and the very nature of a debt-credit system belie them.
They are stuck and they either come to terms to provide relief that is owed, or eventually enough “wolves” will wake up— enough other countries will realize that they have been or are being victimized in exactly the same way, and then all bets are off.
I suspect that this latter fact is what makes the World Bank so nervous.
Growth and profits are good things for corporations—-and that includes banks, but not at the cost of enslaving people you are supposed to serve, and not at the cost of fraud, embezzlement, and all the other crimes involved.
This is just "the credit side' of things. There's more that puts us -- Americans -- at odds with Karen and the World Bank on the actual assets side.
In 1868, the Scottish Government chartered a commercial corporation calling itself "The United States of America, Inc." They then gained access to our credit using this semantic deceit. Their plan and the plan of every other corporation operating in this manner ever since, was simply to charge up our credit cards to the limit, claim bankruptcy protection for themselves, and claim that we were their co-signers --- so as to leave us holding the proverbial bag. Before their planned bankruptcy, however, they did a number of things that have still to be corrected or accounted for.
Most significantly, they bought the Philippine Islands "for" us, using our money to do it, and then, they transported all our physical gold to the Philippines for "safe-keeping" offshore.
Yeah, right.
That original Doppelganger went bankrupt in 1906 and the next Doppelganger, "the" United States of America, Inc. pulled the same basic trick, inflated the currency, ran up the stock market, caused the whole "Roaring Twenties" and Prohibition mark up, went bankrupt in 1933 --- and in 1934, their Board of Directors calling itself a "Congress" passed legislation "creating an independent government for the Philippines".
This created a situation wherein we owned the land of the Philippines lock, stock, and barrel, but now the Philippines had an "independent government" to act as the Trustee for all our gold that was packed off and stored there. This is the connect between Marcos and the Philippines and our gold and President Kennedy and the various agreements that various Presidents made "for" us and that Karen keeps hooting about --- the Bilateral Minefields and Green Hilton and so on.
To put it mildly, all that went on back then by any sane evaluation, is piracy.
And by Maxim of Law, "Possession by Pirates does not change ownership."
Everything that they stashed over there still belongs to us and we have the shipping and docket and flat and box numbers and everything else from those days down to this: We even have their supreme Bank Trustee in our jurisdiction, and are working with him to sort this Mess out.
So, that is strike Number Three that Karen Hudes and the World Bank don't want to face.
Don't get me wrong. The Americans don't own all the gold that is cashiered in the Philippines and Indonesia. We do, however, own a very goodly part of it, and we own it outright. Our gold and silver deposits collateralize many, many, many banks and the loss of that collateral is what ultimately terrifies the banks.
As with so many other bunko schemes they changed the meaning of "Depositor" to allow themselves to seize deposits left in their keeping, but our deposits were made before those surreptitious changes away from a "normal course of business" ---- so we are unaffected and grandfathered-in.
Karen and her Employers at the World Bank don't know whether to stand up or sit down as a result. Nobody knows what to do, and at the same time, nobody wants to talk to us --- because they are afraid of us. They know how mercilessly we have been cheated and defrauded and they expect no mercy in return.
I can only assume that they judge others by themselves.
However, in the broad scheme of life, it does no good for anyone to seek the destruction of others. That just opens up another avenue for nasty people to profit themselves at everyone else's expense, so no, we are not proposing vengeance. We are proposing a peace and reconciliation process to discharge odious debt and open up credit resources and restore a sane economic system, at the same time that we fully restore our own government--- putting Americans in control of America again.
This should be good news for people worldwide, as it dawns on them that "the US" is not America. It should also be a relief that we are proceeding in a lawful and peaceful manner and not being vengeful. At the same time, Mr. Trump and the Pope and the Queen, need to talk directly to the actual Creditors and dispense with any pretense that we are anyone or anything but what we are: the American States and People, doing business as The United States of America [Unincorporated].
Obviously, Karen and the World Bank and the community that she represents professionally have tried to avoid these facts and tried to explain them (and us) away, and that is why I have a less-than-high regard for Karen. I see her as someone who is grinding her own wheel and actually protecting interests that have been less than honest and forthcoming both now and in the past.
That doesn't mean that they can't change, and it doesn't mean that we won't talk to them in the interests of resolving all these issues. It just means that the facts as we know and observe them don't jive with the story that Karen is selling.


See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

BWAAAH! What Have I Been Telling You???

By Anna Von Reitz

For several years now, I have flatly defended Pope Benedict and praised him for his efforts to dismantle the criminal machinery of the Pontificate and the incorporated governmental services entities masquerading "as" national governments worldwide.  I have explained and published my role giving Notice and Due Process to his employees, to stop the wrong-doing and fraud they have been engaged in, in numerous articles, published letters, and especially my book, Disclosure 101.  

But there have been those who have instead told you that Benedict XVI was an evil man and that as Pope he "had to be" in on the fraud, and those who have tried to paint me as an "Agent of the Vatican" even though it is plain as the nose on my face that acting as a "private attorney" for Benedict XVI has nothing to do with the Vatican.  

My business with the Pope was with the Holy See, regarding the contracts we hold with them since the 1700's; the Vatican only came into existence in 1929.  

And now, today, look at what comes across my desk.  Confirmation of the "Vatican Coup" led by Soros, Obummer, Killary, Biden, and the rest of the Goon Squad from Hell, promoting a radical leftist --- Pope Francis, who, technically, isn't even eligible to serve as Pope. 

Jesuits take their Oath to serve the Pope, which logically precludes the premise of a Jesuit holding the Office.   Anyone who knows anything about the Roman Catholic Church was taken aback by that, including millions of Catholics. 

And here, at last, is the confirmation of what I always knew: Benedict XVI was black mailed and deposed by force.  The whole Papacy has been reduced to a politicized farce and Francis does well not to accept obedience, because he is owed none.  Read on: 

WikiLeaks: Clinton, Obama, Soros Overthrew Pope Benedict In Vatican Coup

Posted by Francesco I
George Soros, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton orchestrated a coup in the Vatican to overthrow the conservative Pope Benedict and replace him with radical leftist Pope Francis, according to a group of Catholic leaders citing evidence from various sources including WikiLeaks emails.
Pope Benedict XVI reigned as Pope of the Catholic Church from 2005 to 2013 before unexpectedly resigning in unusual circumstances. Becoming the first Pope to step down since Pope Gregory XII in 1415, Benedict is widely considered the first to do so on his own initiative since Pope Celestine V in 1294.
However the group of Catholic leaders cite new evidence uncovered in emails released by WikiLeaks to claim the conservative Pope Benedict did not actually resign on his own initiative, but was pushed out of the Vatican by a coup that the group of researchers are calling the “Catholic Spring.”
Soros, Obama and Clinton used the United States’ diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce, bribe and blackmail “regime change” in the Roman Catholic Church in order to replace the conservative Benedict with the current Pope Francis – who has since become an unlikely mouthpiece for the international left, stunning Catholics around the world.
Now the group of Catholic leaders have sent a letter to President Trump urging him to launch an official investigation into the activities of George Soros, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton (and others) who they allege were involved in orchestrating Catholic Spring that resulted in their goal of “regime change” in the Vatican.
The Catholic leaders cite eight specific questions they seek to have answered concerning suspect events that led to the resignation of Pope Benedict, the first papal abdication in 700 years.
“Specifically, we have reason to believe that a Vatican ‘regime change’ was engineered by the Obama administration,” say the petitioners, in their January 20
“We were alarmed to discover,” their letter notes, “that, during the third year of the first term of the Obama administration your previous opponent, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and other government officials with whom she associated proposed a Catholic ‘revolution’ in which the final demise of what was left of the Catholic Church in America would be realized.”
The letter includes links to documents and news stories underscoring their claims. It first directs attention to the notorious Soros-Clinton-Podesta e-mails disclosed last year by WikiLeaks, in which Podesta and other progressives discussed regime change to remove what they described as the “middle ages dictatorship” in the Catholic Church.
Regarding the Podesta e-mails in question, The New American
“Podesta, a longtime Clinton adviser/confidante and hand-picked top activist for left-wing funder George Soros, revealed in a 2011 e-mail that he and other activists were working to effect a “Catholic Spring” revolution within the Catholic Church, an obvious reference to the disastrous “Arab Spring” coups organized that same year by the Obama-Clinton-Soros team that destabilized the Middle East and brought radical Islamist regimes and terrorist groups to power in the region.The Podesta e-mail is a response to another Soros-funded radical — Sandy Newman, founder of the “progressive” Voices for Progress. Newman had written to Podesta seeking advice on the best way to “plant the seeds of the revolution” in the Catholic Church, which he described as a “middle ages [sic] dictatorship.”
In their letter to President Trump, the group of Catholics leaders write: “Approximately a year after this e-mail discussion, which was never intended to be made public, we find that Pope Benedict XVI abdicated under highly unusual circumstances and was replaced by a pope whose apparent mission is to provide a spiritual component to the radical ideological agenda of the international left. The Pontificate of Pope Francis has subsequently called into question its own legitimacy on a multitude of occasions.”
“We remain puzzled by the behavior of this ideologically charged Pope, whose mission seems to be one of advancing secular agendas of the left rather than guiding the Catholic Church in Her sacred mission,” they say, expressing the thoughts of millions of Catholics around the world stunned by Pope Francis’s left-wing ideology. “It is simply not the proper role of a Pope to be involved in politics to the point that he is considered to be the leader of the international left.”…/3001-did-vatica…
“With all of this in mind, and wishing the best for our country as well as for Catholics worldwide, we believe it to be the responsibility of loyal and informed United States Catholics to petition you to authorize an investigation into the following questions:
– To what end was the National Security Agency monitoring the conclave that elected Pope Francis?
– What other covert operations were carried out by US government operatives concerning the resignation of Pope Benedict or the conclave that elected Pope Francis?
– Did US government operatives have contact with the “Cardinal Danneels Mafia”?
– International monetary transactions with the Vatican were suspended during the last few days prior to the resignation of Pope Benedict. Were any U.S. Government agencies involved in this?
– Why were international monetary transactions resumed on February 12, 2013, the day after Benedict XVI announced his resignation? Was this pure coincidence?
– What actions, if any, were actually taken by John Podesta, Hillary Clinton, and others tied to the Obama administration who were involved in the discussion proposing the fomenting of a “Catholic Spring”?
– What was the purpose and nature of the secret meeting between Vice President Joseph Biden and Pope Benedict XVI at the Vatican on or about June 3, 2011?
– What roles were played by George Soros and other international financiers who may be currently residing in United States territory?”
The investigation the group of Catholic leaders is requesting of President Trump should be of interest to more than just Catholics. George Soros’s ability to co-opt leading political figures to assist his radical plans for nation states is well known; but his ability to force “regime change” in the Catholic church, an institution previously thought impenetrable from the outside, raises serious questions about his potential for global chaos. The investigation — and punishment — should begin at once.

See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

Dear Kirk Pendergrass

By Anna Von Reitz

Let me point something out to you --- nothing in Federal Code pertains to the States and People except those few portions of legislation published in the Federal Record, not the Federal Register, and only those portions published in the Congressional Record that are in alignment with the original intent of the Constitutions are valid.  

That means about 8 percent of all the "Acts of Congress" have portions that apply to actual Americans, and of those, about half,are either contrary to the original intent or otherwise invalid from the get-go.   

Title 42 says virtually nothing about the actual States or People; it concerns itself with British Territorial Government operations and United States Citizens and issues that don't pertain to any Joe Average American.  It's all well and good -- what you are doing -- but it still only pertains properly to Territorial United States Citizens: that is, to Legal Persons, not People. 

And why are we bothering to fight that fight?   

It would seem that only a rather small percentage of Americans would ever need to do such a thing --- attorneys, doctors, dentists, pilots, and certain other "licensed" professions that have been illegally and immorally conscripted under color of law, are about the only ones impacted.  

I am not suggesting that we leave these Americans to their fate, merely that the point is illegal conscription of civilian "assets" all across the board, not a case by case campaign to obtain redress from foreign British Territorial State of State Legislatures that shouldn't even be in operation on our shores. 

These are our subcontractors and employees.  We don't petition them.  We don't seek redress from their legislatures.  We kick them in the rump for insubordination and return their "legislation" to them for repeal or correction.   

There is an entire living government "of the people, for the people, and by the people" that exists outside of and beyond the Federal Subcontractors and their Agencies and operations, a whole "other" jurisdiction that belongs only to the States and People of this country, and which is foreign with respect to both the United States [Territorial] Citizens, and Municipal "citizens of the United States".   

And our Subcontractors operating under our Delegated Powers, the Queen and the Pope, both know it.  

How is it that so many other worthy people, including yourself, are caught up and confused about who we are and what we are owed and what the actual proper action is? 

I understand that Field may have elected to retain US Citizenship as a result of his own situation, but that leaves him in a different political status --- NOT the normal political status Americans are heir to and which at least 90% of us should be exercising.   

If he had corrected his political status prior to all this happening, he wouldn't be in any "Federal" jurisdiction and would not be considered any "subject matter" for them to arrest and impound, either.  Redressing his grievances in the Legislature is part and parcel of accepting Territorial United States Citizenship, and most Americans have no rational reason in the world to accept such a foreign and subordinate political status.  

The living people and Lawful Persons of this country are not subject to Statute.
 As the name implies, Statutory Entities, that is, legal fiction entities, are subject to Statute because they are created by Statute.  

Are we created by any form of Statute?    My parents would disagree. 

The actual People, that is, the Lawful Persons who are State Citizens, retain the right to directly nullify any legislative act, code, or regulation derived from legislation.  Our courts can directly overturn any legislation via jury nullification.

No petitioning to any executive officer getting a paycheck from us.  No redress sought from the criminals in the various territorial and municipal legislatures.  

Just flat out average people operating in their proper political status and organizing their own State and local County assemblies have the power to overturn whatever criminal or civil statutes these roaches "offer" to "presume" upon us while pretending to "represent" us. 

Pray tell, why would we need someone to "represent" us, when we are present ourselves?  

This curious concept of "representation" is made necessary only by constructive fraud and impersonation being practiced against us by members of the Bar Associations, which are, as you have begun to uncover --- illegal "guilds"---- trade unions.  A Bar Card is a Guild Card is a Union Card. 

The Bars, both the so-called "American Bar Association" and the "US Bar Association" have been operating what appear to be our courts as closed Union Shops, and the Municipal COURTS have been operating in violation of Federal Code, and they get away with it because they don't operate under Territorial Federal Code, they operate under their own Municipal Code which nobody (hardly) references. 

So these foreign interlopers have both been sitting dry docked on our shores, both impersonating us, with the Municipal COURTS operating in flagrant violation of the Smith Act and Taft-Hartley Act, both. 

They, the Bar Associations and the Courts they are operating, all need to be busted as criminal enterprises --- undeclared Foreign Agents engaged in racketeering, coercion, identity theft, human trafficking, impersonation, barratry, and more on our shores. 

Any legislation repugnant to the Constitution, to the spirit and intent of our Public Law, our Declaration of Independence, or our moral sense, needs to get tossed out the door in our courts without a backward nod to the "Congresses" or the foreign State of State Legislatures.  And that is why the perpetrators of the Great Fraud have tried for so long to suppress us and suppress our land and soil jurisdiction courts --- ever since the Civil War.  

These animals literally steal our identities as Americans and impersonate us while we are still babies in our cradles,  then lie to and extort us into adhesion contracts as youths, and illegally tax and mortgage us to death as adults.  

I see no reason for us, Americans, to pander to nor to seek redress from their foreign legislatures.  I see reason to fire the whole lot of them and subject them to the actual Public Law of this country and the actual international Law of the Admiralty.  

Why bother getting involved in some internecine one-by-one brush fire contest with these Buggers, grinding our way through Due Process and seeking redress from their foreign legislatures?  Why not attack the issue of their unlawful and illegal conscription and press-ganging of Americans into their jurisdiction in the first place, which is at the root of all these problems and issues, including those suffered by "licensed" professionals?  

Why not address them in Admiralty and bust them for genocide on paper and human trafficking of American babies in violation of both the Hague and Geneva Conventions?  

Where is Quantico when we need them?  Forgot who we are?  Forgot who they actually work for?  

Everyone needs to get a move on and start striking at the roots, not the leaves and branches. 

We need to kick their rumps back into the sea where they belong, liquidate their corporations as criminal operations, and seize upon every asset that they think they own.  We need to bust up their monopolies including the Media Circus and Bar Associations and rip and tear through them like so much frozen butter in the face of some very hot knives.   

Of course, I support any and every effort to put an end to the criminality by any means and in whatever venue.  I do.  But fighting the brush fires is not really the point.  Nailing the arsonists flat to the floor is the point.  


See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

Sending THEM Home

By Anna Von Reitz

While everyone is running around willy-nilly and certain irresponsible fools are talking about another civil war (Civil War 2.0)  on our shores, it's time to remember whose shores these are and the fact that these are our employees. 

Now that The United States of America [Unincorporated] is up and assembled and functioning, we can send the entire Municipal Government Pink Slips for insubordination and Breach of Trust and send them home without supper. 

Once the Delegators enter the room ---- and we have ---- its time for the Pope and the Queen to step down and do our bidding, not the other way around. 

This is our country, our land, our soil.  They don't have a tinker's damn to stage any kind of "war" or any mercenary conflict here.  If they do, they will be shown up as nothing but international criminals operating in Gross Breach of Trust and Commercial Service Contract.  

We will arrest their leaders as criminals and try them for treason and execute them, as per the Public Law of this country and nation.  

And we will hold the Pope and the Roman Curia directly responsible in all cases, as the Pope (1) directly owns the Municipal United States Government; (2) indirectly owns (through the Queen) the Territorial United States Government, and (3) owns the United Nations (through majority stock ownership of the UN Corporation).  

So any way that Francis and the Boyz want to cut this, they are on the hook for it, 100%, and no getting out of the blame for it and the cost of it, whatever it turns out to be beyond a whole lot of blather.  

As for the actual and factual Government of this country, we are giving our Municipal Government Employees and their Boss, the Pope, a straight ultimatum --- either get back in your box and behave, or every single Municipal Employee and Agency Employee is fired, off our payroll, effective 12 December 2019. 

That includes the members of the Municipal Congress.  

Drop the saber rattling and the impeachment crappola or the next one on the chopping block will be SERCO.  


See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

Shoes and Justices

By Anna Von Reitz

Let's call him "Ben" --- a kid in my First Grade class at Black River Falls Elementary School, which was a big, old, rambling nineteenth-century brick building with a spooky Mansard roof structure like something out of the Addams Family movies. 

Ben was a strapping boy, tall for his age, with pale skin and dark eyes and dark hair swept over from a side part.  I always liked him.  He was polite and personable and friendly, but he was poor as the pigeons in the park.  His family had eleven children.  He was in the middle of the pack.  And they and their parents were trying to make a go of it on a hard-scrabble worn out dairy farm somewhere in the back of the back country.  

Even with a well-oiled system of hand-me-downs, by the time you hit the fifth or sixth generation, things are worn out.  So, there was Ben, and we had all returned to school for the fall semester --- most of us in new school clothes and shoes, but not him.  He was wearing a ragged flannel shirt with arms too short, a pair of pants two sizes too big, and a pair of old brown leather dress shoes that looked like they belonged on a grown man.  He could barely walk in them, but he was trying.  

We were all only six years old, but still, his appearance was arresting --- like a scarecrow or someone playing dress up.  

To make matters worse, the whole family was "poor proud" and wouldn't take any help.  

So we had to do something, but what?  

A Gentle Conspiracy between my Mom, my teacher, and a local merchant took place, in which I played a small part.  Our teacher contrived a school lesson about feet and had everyone make an outline of their foot as part of the lesson.  

Using this as a guide, my Mom and old Mr. Moe, owner of Moe's Shoe Store, and I --- acting under strict secrecy --- found just the right shoes.  They and a shoe care kit appeared in Ben's cubbyhole at school.  He couldn't believe his eyes, but he put them on.  All that winter, I would see him out in the coat room brushing and shining his shoes.  So I asked my Mom if I could have a shoe care kit for Christmas.  

She smiled and looked bemused, but agreed.  That would be one of my gifts. I made good use of it, too. I polished shoes and oiled boots for everyone in the family. 

Years later, when I was in college, I had a roommate from Wayzata, Minnesota, a very upscale neighborhood in Minneapolis.  She had never seen anyone polish their own shoes.  Well, surprise, surprise, I had been taking care of my boots and shoes, thanks to Ben, ever since I was six years old.  And I taught her how, too.  

Now, people in the State Assemblies who are grappling with the process of electing Justices of the Peace often ask me how they are supposed to find qualified people to serve their Courts.  

Obviously, no Bar Association Members can serve in our courts, thanks to the Titles of Nobility Amendment,  and that leaves many people feeling alarmed; they are so indoctrinated into the idea that you have to be a Bar Member to be "legitimate" that they don't know what to think or do. 

However, virtually everyone knows The Ten Commandments, and that's what our courts use as our law, with reference to earlier deliberations known as case law, but never being bound by prior precedents.  

In our courts, the jury is still king and the Justices of the Peace rule upon the rules of the court and letter of the law, not the facts and law in any particular case.  The People decide the facts and the law.  So, unlike the Bar Courts, where the Judge is king, in our courts the Justices provide a different function.  

In our courts, the Justices assist the juries by answering questions about the rules of evidence and testimony and the meaning of any confusing terms and jargon -- "the letter of the law" --- but from there on, our courts depend on the sense of justice and moral conscience embedded in each juror and also upon each juror's ability to sift through facts and reason their way to reasonable conclusions.  

Also, unlike the foreign process, we know our Justices.  We don't just vote for a name on a ballot and hope that John G. Finkelmeyer is a good guy because he is recommended by the Bar Association. 

So, who do you want as a Justice of the Peace?  

First and foremost, a Justice in our courts has to know The Ten Commandments, front and back and sideways.  You want someone who is familiar with the Bible, and particularly, with the Old Testament Law which is common to Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.  

Our Justices carry the Bible with them when they enter the courtroom.  This is the origin of having people stand up when the Justice enters the courtroom --- not out of respect for him, but out of respect for the Bible and the Law it contains. 

Second, you need people who are hard-headed enough to bear the cost of rendering justice.  It's not an easy job to sit in judgement, but there are times when punishment has to be meted out in order  to preserve the peace and safety of innocent individuals, families, and communities.  

So preserving peace and safety is the goal of our courts and you need people strong enough to lay the gavel down in behalf of the whole community when it becomes necessary.    

You want Justices who have firm common sense and a wide range of practical experience in life---not little tweaky-bird college boys who never learned to shine their own shoes.  As a result, most Justices of the Peace are, and will always tend to be, "of a certain age".  

Justices need to be smart, hard-headed, logical, and honest ---but they also have to walk the line of moral conscience and have sincere care and respect for people in all conditions of life.  

Finally, Justices of the Peace have to have an interest in and familiarity with Due Process, Rules of Evidence, and American Common Law --- which have to be learned like any other subjects.  

In about three months of hard study, anyone can learn how to put together and run a competent Common Law Court.  My experience with the people of this country suggests that we have thousands of men and women who have by various routes, achieved this basic knowledge, but may need to adjust their viewpoint to exclude additional knowledge they have acquired about admiralty and maritime courts.  

In other words, we have no general lack of education about the various forms of law, but there is a common degree of confusion regarding the practices that belong in an American Common Law Court and those foreign practices peculiar to Admiralty and Maritime venues.  

Thus, finding competent Justices of the Peace may require candidates to go through a process of "unlearning" as well as learning the principles of our Public Law system---- and for many good candidates, that may include sorting out the jurisdictions in their own minds until they have a firm comprehension of Public Law based on The Ten Commandments and Due Process, versus private law based on Codes and Regulations and Judicial Discretion. 

Many former Bar Attorneys are now joining our ranks and undergoing just exactly this kind of "unlearning" process.  It takes about two years on average, based on our experience, for people who have grown up in and practiced private law, to thoroughly adjust to Public Law.  

So, ironically, someone who has never gone to a conventional law school nor practiced in the Admiralty/Maritime Court system is likely to have an easier road and quicker grasp of the foundation principles and practices of our courts, simply because they don't have as much to "unlearn". 

One of the key differences between our courts and the foreign courts, is that our courts consider both the facts and the law, and hold the power of jury nullification.   In other words, our courts have the ability to directly overturn legislation and uphold constitutional guarantees ---powers that the Admiralty and Maritime Courts do not possess and cannot consider exercising. 

Learning to shine one's own shoes is strangely analogous to learning to run your own State, your own Courts, and your own life.  It's simple and practical enough so that anyone can learn to do it, and beneficial enough so that everyone ought to learn.  Finding competent Justices of the Peace is just a practical matter of looking among the members of your community and your State Assembly to find those who have "the right stuff" to serve.  

So start looking for bright, even-handed, common sense people who have their heads screwed on, a knowledge of the Bible, a willingness to serve, a humble heart, and either the direct experience or the willingness to study Due Process, Rules of Evidence, and American Common Law. 

A couple years after Ben got those new shoes, things started looking up for his family.  His two oldest brothers matured enough to weigh in on the farm work and took enough burden off their Father so that he could take a paid job in town.  With his extra income and the older children taking up position to help on the farm, the family began to flourish.  Ben had everything he needed from then on, plus, he had learned to polish his own shoes --- a lesson he would pass on.

Last time I went home to Black River Falls, Wisconsin, I bumped into "Ben" at one of the local hardware stores.  He had his son and two grandchildren with him.  Every shoe was spic and span. 

If we don't already know, we can learn how to polish our own shoes and how to run our own courts.  It's all just a practical and caring process of taking care of our own country and community, the same way we care for and maintain a pair of good sturdy shoes.  


See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

For Ernest and All the White Hats

By Anna Von Reitz

One of the things I learned a long time ago, is that you have to deal with people as individuals, because group-think leads to injustice. And prejudice.  And bigotry.  Just because my husband and I are of "royal blood" doesn't mean that we are royal skunks.  Our Ancestors broke from the Bloodline snobs a long time ago and have paid with our lives and fortunes for it ever since.  
And just because I helped Pope Benedict give Notice to this Employees of their wrong-doing does not mean that I was helping him do any wrong-doing. Benedict was being black-mailed, but he still took action to correct and to help us derail the machine.
Read that:  I was helping him in his efforts to correct the Mess, prior to those efforts being side-lined by Francis and the Curia. Remember those twelve Archbishops who were killed in a train wreck? Get a clue.
Good men have died over this power struggle --- many of them Catholic and some Protestants, too. But exposing the rot and miasma within the Church and correcting it, is of top priority for everyone on this planet --- Catholic and non-Catholic, too.
As I explained to Robert David Steele:
…..”What appears to have happened is that a single "heir" was assigned by the various Families and he is the "owner" in the legal sense, whereas, there are numerous Trustees operating for (1) the banks and (2) the depositors, plus (3) a cadre of those controlling the bank transfer systems.  
Add to that mix the complications that arise when you attempt to interface hundreds of different kinds of currencies and money issued by over 200 countries during the past few centuries and you have a recipe for a Perfect Storm.  
And now that you have that recipe, add this one final factor: jurisdiction.  
Only Lawful Persons can possess Lawful Assets.  That is, only people having the proper political status can actually possess and hold land, gold, silver, etc. “
Okay. Got that?   What have I and those with me been doing?
Encouraging people to correct their falsified political status records so that they can act as Lawful Persons---- State Citizens.  We have been teaching them how to do that, so that they can inherit and possess the land and receive back all the other actual material assets that rightfully belong to them, instead of standing around with a doo-dad in their hair and having everything that is theirs stolen from them under False Pretenses.
And again:
“….the Vatican Boyz were pushing to incorporate all the government services corporations and trying to operate them "as" actual governments, and then simply also redefine all the government workers ----and eventually all the people in entire countries as purportedly "voluntary" franchises of these governmental services corporations.   
By incorporation, they effectively "killed" these governments and people on paper, reducing them to the level and standing of legal fiction entities.  And they were doing this so secretively, with such a high degree of compartmentalization, that nobody saw it.  
But the end game of all this, is that the "winners" --- would be those who maintained their status as living people and as unincorporated governments.  According to their plan, the Holy See would be left as the only such government on Earth.  
They would then literally possess and own everything of an actual and factual nature --- and the rest of us would be disinherited "things" trapped in the realm of fiction, the proverbial Land of OZ.  Thus, the mad dream of the Unum Sanctum Trust would finally be realized as One World Government under the Bishop of Rome, and the Bishop of Rome would serve Mammon as the head of the so-called "Secular Church".     
They came very close to succeeding.  When we woke up there were only six unincorporated governments of any size left in the world.  That number had dwindled down to three by the time we managed to bring forward The United States of America [Unincorporated]. 
The United Nations has been populated by incorporated government services corporations all operating under the old Vichy French "UN Corp"--- so it would appear to "represent" all the countries on Earth, but would actually be just a bunch of franchises like Dairy Queen franchises under the thumb and forefingers of the UN Corp stockholders, and the principal stockholder with controlling interest would be the Pope. 
There were very few Lawful Persons left "alive" on paper who could inherit the land and other physical assets, and what they were doing by hook or by crook, was something similar to the theme of the popular "Highlander" movies ---- finding ways to kill off the remaining few.  That's why, among other things, the pressure to destroy the governments of North Korea and Iran.  
And it has all been predicated on commercial fraud and obstruction of trade and illegal banking and securities operations, including commodity rigging and counterfeiting.”
That is, crime.
So, for those who want to take pot-shots at me for being a “royal” --- remember that it was “royals” of a different kind who fought and bled to give you all “sovereignty in your own right”, so that you could stand as men and women and as Free Holders in your own country---if you have sense enough to do so. 
It was my ancestors and my husband’s ancestors who gave the world the concept of “Might for right.” And the Magna Carta.  And who also championed the “novel idea” that men could and should learn to govern themselves.  Guilty as charged.
Let me also remind them that Pope Benedict took action in behalf of the people of this Earth despite being black-mailed and having his life threatened. And it was because he put a “full stop” on the machinery of the “Secular Church” that he was ousted as Pontiff and replaced by Francis, a man of certain politics.
And yes, so long as the Pope was willing to do the right thing by the people of this planet, I was willing to help him.  So long as the Pope was moving toward honest reform, I was willing to help him. 
But war-mongers and criminals who think that they have the right to steal from babies what the True God gave them, and those who would dictate the lives of others,  and all the miscreants and unrepentant criminals of the world know, that the True God is set against them and that I am set --- and sent --- against them, too. 
So pay attention to my works and what I am teaching you, because it is for your good and because by our works we are known and that is the only way that anyone is ever known---- including those who claim to be “White Hats”.


See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.