Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Thursday, April 30, 2015

Update from the Sugar Pine Mine and the Oathkeepers security operation

Communications is key to this operation. So far so good, but we need more help, especially people who have a ham license, both Techs and Generals.

Call me at 406 253 4257 for the details from Grants Pass and the Sugar Pine Mine.

Sunday, April 19, 2015

A New Oath Keepers Standoff with the BLM? Not quite…

Liberty Brothers Radio at Sugar Pine Mine in Oregon: Oath Keepers Welcome



Some un-American Americans just don’t get it.
OMG! they shriek — these miners would dare oppose federal authority– OMG!
Contrary to the intent of this nation’s founders, some people advocate blindly following whatever statute the force of government declares to be “the law”. Some people do not see any value in questioning authority.  Right here in America, to this day, exist some people who think the government did nothing wrong when it burned to death over eighty men, women, and children at Waco, Texas over an illegal “law” regarding guns. The idiotic zealots of the ATF and FBI and elements of the U.S. military totally failed to read the Second Amendment of the highest law of the land, which clearly notes that any law about guns proffered since the Second Amendment was ratified is an “infringement” of the very law they swore an Oath to protect and defend.  Did I make myself clear? Let me repeat — the Constitution forbids any restrictions about any arms We The People can bear. It does not make exceptions regarding how many bullets-per-minute a gun can fire, or how long or short a gun barrel must or must not be. It simply says, “…shall not be infringed.” Yet the ATF had a problem with the Constitution and murdered more than eighty church members in a fiery death with rampant gruesome cruelty. They even shot those who tried to run out of the burning church to escape the fire.
So the ATF and FBI revealed why unchecked government “authority” was prohibited by our Constitution’s authors and the several States which ratified it. And yet some Americans to this day insist that We The People are not to question authority.
Even now there is an Internet chorus of lame-brained quasi-Americans who are spreading lies about the Oath Keepers who are standing to protect  property rights for some miners in Oregon. I will not link those here because they don’t deserve the clicks, but I can tell you that some of the rumors are very nasty, and some even wish death upon the Oath Keepers who are helping protect lawful property rights from an insane government mechanism called the “BLM”. They are pumping outright lies and vicious rumors onto the Internet, and have the gall to accuse Oath Keepers of violating “the law” by standing up for the miners’ property rights and for the right to due process.
Authority-worshiping statists are falsely declaring that the Oath Keepers are not welcome there at the mines, and that the Oath Keepers are a private militia of sorts who operate outside the “law”, and that the Oath Keepers are “anti-government” — and worse. These cretins maintain that Americans must blindly follow every statute put on the books, whether a statute is pursuant to the Constitution or not, and never question “authority”. If the God-Almighty Government (GAG) says something, then it’s the By-God truth and anyone who questions it is “anti-government”. That is the progressive statist mindset. And that particular mindset is now making up lies about Oath Keepers.
Lies about Oath Keepers have been with us since April 19, 2009, when Oath Keepers held its first muster at Lexington Green, Massachusetts. Yet Oath Keepers continues to serve the Liberty movement in America to this day, on our sixth anniversary as an organization. So let’s celebrate the dawn of year seven by enjoying a timely dose of truth. Let’s hear the truth from the mine owner who invited Oath Keepers to come help him save his mine from BLM encroachment.
Oath Keepers would like to thank The LIberty Brothers Radio staff for bringing the truth about Oath Keepers at Oregon’s Sugar Pine Mine to America. From their website I have lifted their interview with Rick Barclay, owner of the Sugar Pine Mine. You can read the article by Jason Van Tatenhove of The Liberty Brothers Radio staff, who went there “boots on the ground” to film this interview. Link for Jason’s article:
Give ‘em some clicks, eh? Thank you.
Elias Alias

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Jade Helm is an open declaration of war against the American people

Lt. Col. Caught In Lies About Jade Helm: Our Worst Fears Confirmed!

There are times in life when we need to know when to step aside and let others do the talking. This is that time. The Common Sense Show, has been deluged with communications which detail abnormally high amounts of troop and equipment movement across the United States in preparation for Jade Helm 15. Along the same lines, we are hearing from people who have relatives in Special Operations that very concerned aboutwhat is coming.

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

The Day the Feds Stood Down-Micro Documentary

The Battle of Bunkerville: One Year Later

The relative calm of Southern Nevada’s Clark County was shattered in April of 2014 when agents of the private, government contracted Bureau of Land Management moved in-force against 67 year-old Nevada Rancher, Cliven Bundy.

The reasons given for why a private company would violate a law-abiding American’s constitutional rights were weak, at best. The claim by the BLM was that they were working to protect the desert tortoise, the same desert tortoise that fell victim to mass genocide by another federally funded agency, The Desert Tortoise Conservation Center, some 8 months previous. In that budget cutting measure, it is estimated that ½ of the 1400 turtles housed at the conservation center would be euthanized. An act that calls into serious question the real motives of the BLM.
In addition to their role as protectors of the desert turtle, the BLM contended that Cliven Bundy was behind on his grazing fees. Fees that Mr. Bundy paid to the State of Nevada, as per an agreement that was cemented before the BLM’s un-lawful arrival. The question is this: Does protecting a turtle, or collecting late-fees, rise to the level of sending snipers, armored vehicles and weapons-ready helicopters to southern Nevada? Was it necessary to Taser unarmed men and pregnant women in an attempt to get a point across? Does the BLM, or any government agency, have the right to sequester the public and herd them into an Orwellian named, “1st Amendment Zone?”

Many Americans from all across this nation didn’t think so, and they acted on a massive scale. What happened next was perhaps the greatest display of American grit and patriotism that I, or many others, have witnessed in their lifetimes. The following micro-documentary is look back to those tense filled days in the warm Nevada sun. It’s the day we won a little of our liberties back…it’s the day that the Feds stood down.
Thanks to Jim White for doing this documentary and for being at the Bundy Ranch with us.

Monday, April 6, 2015

Anna von Reitz Public Order - Share around the world.

From: Anna von Reitz

I have confirmed some very important information this past week and taken action as a result. Please find enclosed a six page summary of the situation we are in and how we got here.
If you can’t read six pages of actual documented -not-my-opinion-history to save your country, then we are all about to be blown to hell. And we will deserve it, for being so incredibly clueless, lazy, and stupid.
We are in control of the public jurisdiction of the Continental United States. Attached as part of the history is a Declaration of Law that is executable as a Court Order by anyone who (1) understands the content of the document, (2) was born on the land of one of the fifty Continental States, (3) is NOT a member of the Bar Association. Follow the instructions--- use red ink to designate that it is being exercised on the land jurisdic- tion and in behalf of the State Superior Court as in “landed (E)state”.
Put away your sabers and get out your red ink pens and you U.S. Mail Certified receipts, Return Receipt Requested----- and do what Thomas Jefferson said we must---chain them down with the Constitution---- the actual Constitution, in action.
Stop worrying about imagined enemies. The only enemies out there are on our payroll, trying to scam up another war-for-profit. Don’t be stupid and allow the cretins to start one here!!!
Keep the peace, guard your words, and DO NOT CONTRIBUTE ONE SYLLABLE of nonense such as is being expressed in so many quarters. Understand that war is what these corporations are good at. That and lying are their stock in trade.
We have hired them to protect us. They would like nothing better than to “protect us against ourselves” ---- use our own unrest as an excuse for killing us, and then send the bill to our families.
They could do a tremendous amount of damage and cost millions of American lives and PROFIT from doing it, but they can NEVER win in international court and they can never win any kind of moral victory.
So hold their feet to the fire using your brains instead of your brawn, all you Bubbas out there. That is what is required now. If you really want to help --- read, sign, and send the attachment to all those who need to see it. Anna

Here are the links to the attachments.  Print these out. Read them. Use them.

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Is Montana Governor Bullock Ignorant of the Law or just Anti-gun?

From one of our readers:

Either Montana Gov. Steve Bullock doesn't understand the constitutional relationship between his state and the federal government, or he’s a liar.
On Friday, Bullock vetoed a bill that would have prohibited state and local agencies in Montana from enforcing any future federal gun laws.
Rep. Art Wittich, sponsored HB203. The bill banned the state “from enforcing, assisting in the enforcement of or otherwise cooperating in the enforcement of” a federal act enacted on or after Jan. 1, 2015 that “prohibits, restricts, or requires individual licensure for ownership, possession, transfer, or use of any firearm or any magazine or other ammunition feeding device.”
Bullock vetoed the bill, saying it “puts law enforcement officers in the position of violating laws they have sworn to uphold.”
To put it bluntly, Bullock is full of crap. It does no such thing.
The governor vetoed a similar bill in 2013 and gave the same reason.
He was wrong then.
He’s still wrong now.
HB203 would not create some kind of moral dilemma for Montana cops. In fact, Bullock makes an absolutely absurd assertion when he claims the bill would put law enforcement officers in a position of “violating laws.” How does leaving the enforcement of federal statutes to federal law enforcement violate any law?
Bullock pretends Montana operates under some kind of sacred obligation to enforce every federal law that comes down the pike from Washington D.C.
It does not.
Nothing says states must enforce federal laws.
In fact, the Supreme Court has consistently held the exact opposite under a well-established legal principle known as the anti-commandeering doctrine. The federal government cannot commandeer state resources or require state personnel to implement any federal act or enforce any federal law.
Bullock must know this. Heck, virtually everybody involved in the political or legal process knows this. We pointed this fact out to him two years ago. Since then, legislators from across the political spectrum have introduced hundreds of bills based on the anti-commandeering doctrine, from measures to prohibit state cooperation with federal immigration enforcement to bills that would end state support for implementation of Obamacare. Last year, Idaho Gov. Butch Otter signed a bill almost identical to HB203 into law.
Nobody of any significance questions the legal basis of any of these bills. The anti-commandeering doctrine stands as “settled law.” As noted constitutional scholar Randy Barnett put it, “State governments are free to refrain from cooperating with federal authorities if they so choose. In general, states cannot attack federal operations, but that’s not the same as refusing to help.”
The legal principle dates back to 1842. Justice Joseph Story held in Prigg v. Pennsylvania that the federal government could not require states to enforce the federal fugitive slave act.
The fundamental principle applicable to all cases of this sort, would seem to be, that where the end is required, the means are given; and where the duty is enjoined, the ability to perform it is contemplated to exist on the part of the functionaries to whom it is entrusted. The [fugitive slave] clause is found in the national Constitution, and not in that of any state. It does not point out any state functionaries, or any state action to carry its provisions into effect. The states cannot, therefore, be compelled to enforce them; and it might well be deemed an unconstitutional exercise of the power of interpretation, to insist that the states are bound to provide means to carry into effect the duties of the national government, nowhere delegated or instrusted to them by the Constitution.
Three more major SCOTUS decision built on the Story’s doctrine.
In New York v. United States (1992) the Court ruled that Congress couldn’t require states to enact specified waste disposal regulations.
In Printz v. United States (1997), the Court ruled that the federal government could not command state law enforcement authorities to conduct background checks on prospective handgun purchasers. Justice Scalia summed up the anti commandeering doctrine in the majority opinion.
The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policymaking is involved, and no case-by-case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty.
And in the 2012 case, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, the Supreme Court ruled that a significant expansion of Medicaid, was not a valid exercise of Congress’s spending power, as it would coerce states to either accept the expansion or risk losing existing Medicaid funding.
Nobody with a clue questions the anti-commandeering doctrine. So, either Bullock doesn’t have a clue, or he is lying because he has an anti-gun political agenda, doesn’t want to have to explain it to Montana voters and hopes the average person won’t know he’s making stuff up that contradicts 173 years of Supreme Court jurisprudence.
You decide which.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

FEMA Camp Takeover Set For Southwest - The takeover is now!

Local officials and law enforcement:
If you help this treason be completed - if you abuse your authority to sell out your country, you will be the first to be killed by this global monster.  They have done this over and over when these evil people take over.

The roundups are beginning. There are only a few things we can do.

1. Get on your knees and pray like it's all up to God (because really it is).

2. Get up and work at preparing like it's all up to you, (to show God your heart is really His)

3. Work at waking up as many friends and family as you can with this information.

Alex Jones discusses the newly revealed training operation that has the troops prep to invade the southwest.
It's called Jade Helm

This was found here: