Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 4600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.

Sunday, November 3, 2019

More Straight Talk About "Money"


By Anna Von Reitz

Go here and understand why it is essential to keep cash in use and to refuse any "cashless" society proposals, and also, pick up on why it is fundamentally necessary to impose increasingly strict bank and securities regulations:


In only ten minutes, you will learn the salient economic facts and the "rationale" behind what the Guilty Parties are trying to promote as a Means to Power for themselves---- to the detriment of the entire Earth, otherwise.

Our answer must come and it must come without delay and without any limp-wristed offer of compromise allowing the bankers and brokers to incrementally wheedle their way forward.

Join me and mine in bringing these issues home to the "government" and the "church" and all those responsible for allowing these bankers to run fraud schemes against entire governments and regions of the world.

Simply arresting and punishing a few dozen bankers and politicians and securities brokers under our existing laws would do wonders toward correcting this problem.

Educating ourselves about money and bothering to think about money and credit, would solve the rest in short order.

Do not neglect this topic. There is nothing more vital than to regain control of the banks and securities corporations and to enforce against them.

There is no issue more important that resisting any and all attempts to remove cash from use, refusing to be "chipped" like cattle, and boycotting any business that refuses cash payments.

Do not be fooled by any contrary arguments, and do not accept any suggestion that people who insist on preserving cash are Luddites.

The Politically Incorrect among us will still be alive and free and ----you won't, if you allow the banks and brokers to get away with a totally digital monetary system. It doesn't matter who controls such a system or what guarantees are made about its security.


----------------------------

See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 


How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Worthy Questions


By Anna Von Reitz

I am doing correspondence today, and as I have piled through stacks of letters I have extracted questions --- and answers --- that in one form or another, keep coming up. I can respond to these queries one at a time --- or I can publish the answers and hope that everyone reads them and shares the answers.

Here's hoping ----and today's sampling:
1. When did the corporate government ever fix anything, without making something else worse?
[Never, in my experience. It's to their advantage to create new service opportunities for themselves, so they spawn new problems in order to have a never-ending roster of problems to solve --- at our expense. The condition of society as a whole continues to devolve as a result of this hidden profit motive on the part of the "government service providers".]
2. How can we possibly win against institutionalized evil?
[ ".....by my Spirit..." according to Zechariah 4:6, and no other way at all, but word of mouth never hurts. ]
3. How do you finance what you do?
[My own retirement resources and donations. This is still an all-volunteer government of the self-governing people. We receive no tax or other revenues from the Interlopers, who are also stonewalling our access to our own assets.]
4. Why do some courts use "so help me God" and others do not?
[The Municipal United States Government is a foreign theocracy run by the Holy See, so their courts use this phrase despite our government's Separation of Church and State.]
5. I am confused by what is "public" and what is "private" and things like "Public Notary" versus "Notary Public"?
[What you are seeing is the mirror image effect of what they have done with our government. Our public courts have been unlawfully converted into private courts, ditto all the "offices" which appear to be public, but are in fact, private corporate offices. We are now engaged in a "lawful conversion" of these corporations and reversing the so-called "privatization" of our government. Obviously, a Public Notary is a Public Office, but a "Notary Public" is a private, corporate office. Notaries can and do function in either capacity, depending on how you set up the paperwork.]
6. We have a few Justices of the Peace here and in the surrounding Counties, and they are waking up. What can we do to help them?
[After everyone concerned has Declared and given Public Notice of their proper political status, you can all pitch in and provide the JPs with real courts again. Form and join your State Assemblies, which will automatically also fill your County Assemblies and Jury Pools. Your JP's need Clerks and Bail Bondsmen, Secretarial help, competent Coroners, Court Deputies and fully empowered Public Notaries. There's a lot of research to be done and a lot of volunteer positions to be filled. They would also appreciate donated office space and secure storage for court records. I am sure that every JP in this country will appreciate the support and assistance and will repay you by providing a viable option to the foreign court systems.]
7. The only State Government I know of is the State of State Government. I notice there are only a few things that simply say, "State". Everything else is State of State, like State of California. Why?
[Our States are populated by State Citizens, but we have been mis-identified as Federal Citizens, instead.
This results in our States being "vacated" and that in turn leaves them (and us) at the mercy of foreign Territorial and Municipal business organizations doing business as "States of States" ---as you have observed. We are supposed to be operating our own State of State, for example, The State of California, but have not done so since the Civil War. That is all part of the Reconstruction that has never been completed.
So, until we do our job and "repopulate" our States and assemble our States and then "reconstruct" the actual American States of State we are owed---the actual State, for example, Georgia, exists as a State Trust doing business as "Georgia State". We continue to have State Office Buildings and State Courts and State Colleges, etc., that are purchased "for" us, and the Legislatures continue to wear two hats --- passing occasional General Session Laws for the State Trust, and otherwise passing statutory laws for the State of State.
As the years have passed and public awareness has waned, the Territorial State of State organizations and the Roman Municipal STATE OF STATE organizations which should not properly exist in this country, have become predatory and have acted in Breach of Trust with respect to our States. I suppose they thought that after a hundred and fifty years of this train wreck, nobody would notice, but we have at long last.
We are fully competent and enabled to declare our political status, operate our States, our Courts, and everything else. We simply have to wake up and do it. So that's why you see "State of State" instead of "State" and that is also why you will increasingly see "State" organizations in operation as we reclaim our lawful government and boot up again after this long hiatus.]
8. Why do people blame you for what happens to them, when they don't follow your advice?
[I suppose it is a variation of accusing others of what you do yourself, or as the English describe it, "the pot calling the kettle black". What happened with the Colorado Nine is a good example.
I had been working with them to reclaim their birthright political status and to resurrect their proper State Government, rebuild the State and County Courts, etc., as described above, but a fast-talking federal insurance agent named Michael R. Hamilton gained their confidence and misled them. They took his advice, not mine, and got in trouble, yet some people continue to blame me for these unfortunate results.
I still get blamed for Michael R. Hamilton's dirty work and for the Colorado Nine's failure to listen to me. Go figure, again. Read Article 484, on my website, www.annavonreitz.com, which was published at the time and which gives a blow-by-blow of what actually went on and what I actually advised.
Let me make this eternally clear --- I provide water. The "horses" have to drink it to get any benefit or protection from it. They have to learn what I teach, understand the history and the law, and consistently conduct their business accordingly---- or they will get into trouble. And I can't help that.
Unfortunately, too, many people only start searching for answers after they have gotten themselves tangled up in the Federale's web, and are thoroughly enmeshed. Depending on the circumstance and issues, it can be very difficult to make these foreign courts let go of a victim, especially if the victim does not have a clear and consistent vision of their own identity, standing, and source of authority.
A great many Americans waver back and forth across jurisdictional lines like drunken sailors, write great lengthy complex screeds where they mix two or more jurisdictions without comment, and provide these foreign courts with ample evidence that they don't really know who they are or what they are doing --- at which point, it is easy for the foreign courts to justify a finding that these men and women are "incompetent", appoint Public Defenders, and take other actions detrimental to the victims.
Until we clean up our act, it is very difficult to force them to clean up theirs.
It also bears repeating that if you are already in the midst of a Foreclosure, a traffic case, or some other "personal" altercation, and you declare your correct political status in the midst of it, the action is not, generally speaking, retroactive. This is because your political status has already been misidentified as that of a Federal Citizen, beginning with the issuance of a Territorial or Municipal Birth Certificate "in your name", and you are presumed to have been acting in that political status at the time you signed the mortgage or got into the fender bender or whatever else you're dealing with.
So, no, declaring your proper birthright political status is not a Silver Bullet. It's only the beginning, the foundation stone of your proper identification, and the first necessary condition required for you and your countrymen to be able to enforce the constitutional guarantees and enjoy the lawful government you are heir to. Once declared as an American State National, you can, of course, sue to get the whole record corrected---but that is another whole battle to be fought.
The best circumstance is to declare your political status as an American State National and give Public Notice before you get into any trouble at all that can be drawn into the foreign courts. And do the same for your children. Declare them to be American State Nationals from the outset of their lives and avoid the whole issue of any "presumed" foreign political status.]
9. I looked it up. You're right. A "license" is permission to do something that is otherwise illegal. Why would I need a license to get married or drive?
[You don't. They do. Remember that Federal Citizens are living in a different political status and in a different jurisdiction of the law: statutory law. You are, if you have reclaimed your birthright political status, operating as one of the people of this country. They are operating as foreign "persons", under foreign law pertaining to such persons.
When your parents failed to come forward and declare your parentage and political status, Federal Employees operating State of State franchises and agency-level "bureaus" -----"claimed" you as a British Territorial United States Citizen. So, they falsified the records, issued a new corporate "franchise" operating "in your name", and subjected you to their foreign territorial law.
Worse than that, the Municipal United States Government purchased an interest in this new territorial corporation franchise named after you, and that all gave rise to the presumption that "you" are a Dual Citizen----and both Federal citizenship obligations are foreign, both subject to different foreign laws.
Municipal citizens of "the" United States, are, for the most part --- slaves.
Municipal citizens were subjected to marriage licensing soon after the Civil War. The fear was that freed plantation slaves would breed like rabbits and give rise to insupportable welfare burdens, so impediments to marriage --- marriage licenses --- were imposed on Colored People.
That's the ugly history of marriage licensing and the essence of the Municipal Government's demand that you obtain a Marriage License, so that they can claim an interest in your relationship and "the products thereof" ---- your children, and thereby control your familial and marital relationships, divorce settlements, and so on.
Marriage licensing is a hideous practice from the Dark Ages--- like much of what the Municipal United States Government practices and does. It has, for example, continued to practice slavery and peonage and has institutionalized these venal practices for almost a hundred years after these practices were outlawed worldwide (1926). The Roman Catholic Church and the Roman Pontiff (or whatever other name by which they now call him) is responsible for this, together with the members of "the" UNITED STATES CONGRESS.
All I can say is --- go get 'em. Nail them down. Expose them. Let everyone on Earth know what they have done here to people that they are actually obligated to serve and protect.
Marriage licensing unlawfully converts what is meant to be a sacred covenant into a business relationship, with the Municipal Government functioning as a Silent Partner.
Federal citizens are also required to obtain Driver Licenses when they operate Motor Vehicles on the public roads for private profit. You are supposed to know whether or not you are either kind of Federal citizen, and whether or not you are operating a business of that kind and also whether or not you are operating a "motor vehicle" ----and you are expected to act accordingly.
As with marriage licensing, this is a self-regulating system of "legal presumption".
Why would you apply for a Marriage License if you are not a Municipal citizen of "the" United States, not a Colored Person, and not required to have one?
Why would you apply for a Driver License if you are not engaged in commercial business activities employing a motor vehicle for profit?
Why would you sign up for Social Security if you are not a federal employee of some kind or a poor Pauper seeking welfare benefits?
Why would you ever act as a volunteer "Withholding Agent" and sign a 1040 Form, if you were not knowingly acting as a federal franchise corporation and accruing corporate profit--- that is, "federal income"?
Would you do any of these things if you were not a Federal citizen of some sort and obligated to do so?
Obviously, not. And so, the foreign "federal" courts, both Territorial and Municipal, provide themselves with a basis for making "legal presumptions" about you and your obligations based on what you, yourself, do.
Similarly, why would you accept a mortgage and agree to pay the debts of a foreign corporation, if you are not acting as a franchisee/shareholder of that corporation?
By various means of restraint of trade, coercion, and abuse of public trust, these foreign business entities have been operating under color of law and have contrived to entrap millions of Americans into inappropriate and profoundly damaging commercial contracts and undisclosed obligations.
You are never given any full disclosure about any of these practices or demands, or the resulting adhesion contracts, and you are regularly coerced and induced and misinformed by undeclared Federal Agents, all acting under color of law, telling you that you "have to" have a Social Security Number, "have to" sign up for Selective Service, "have to" have a Marriage License, and so on.
This is only true if you actually happen to be a Federal Citizen of one stripe or another.
This is just part of what we and our American Government now need to address with our "Federal" Subcontractors. ]
Declare and record your birthright political status, join your State Assembly, and get moving. Your children and your country are depending on you to wake up and take action. 



Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net and get started on the road home, today.
  

----------------------------

See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Once More, Slowly.


By Anna Von Reitz

What are these "Arbitration Awards" being paid out with?
With Federal Reserve Notes, or checks, which transfer digits in a bank ledger, which are merely "representations" of Federal Reserve Notes called "Money of Account".
And what are Federal Reserve Notes?
Federal I.O.U.'s
So you've got an I.O.U. ---- or a "representation" of an I.O.U., issued by the British Territorial United States....
What are these I.O.U.'s based on?
Your own assets.
So?
You are taxing yourself and putting yourself deeper in debt by accepting the "benefit" of your own credit.
Well, it is your own credit, and you should be able to access it when need arises --- but wait.... these guys are forcing you to identify yourself as a United States Citizen before they let you dig yourself and your country deeper into debt.
And what does that do, in addition to digging yourself and your country deeper into debt?
It gives away your actual underlying assets --- your land, your soil, your labor, your Good Name, everything --- to the British Queen, and then, she sells your assets to the Pope.
Oh, lovely.
Now you have gone from being a free American and the lawful owner of great actual material wealth, to being a landless, penniless, deeply-in-debt Pauper, a subject of the Queen and a slave for the Pope.
In exchange for some paper casino chips, whose only value is based on your own assets... you are being robbed of your inheritance...
And all by your own hand.
All "voluntarily".
You just ran to that trough as fast as you could go, and drank your own blood, and you still think you got a free lunch.
You are mistaking your own credit as a "remedy" for their debt to you.
They are laughing at you.
They are thinking, "Geez, these Americans are stupid! Come on, Fiona, keep those printing presses rolling...."
Truly, my people are being destroyed for lack of knowledge. And the whole world is being bilked.
Let's take another instance, for all the Gold Bugs out there, the True Believers who think that gold is "the answer".
Remember Jekyll Island?
Remember the Hundred Year Plan that was discussed there, back in the early 1900's?
What did that Hundred Year Plan call for?
The substitution of fiat currency for actual money.
The collection and consolidation of all the gold supplies on Earth, to the extent possible.
Gradual but continuous devaluation of the fiat currency, so that it becomes worthless.
Return to the gold standard under emergency conditions, thus solving the problem you created by going to fiat currency in the first place.
Classic Hegelian Dialectic --- or, as I prefer to call it, Tricky Bullshit.
Oh, and, by the way, charge the great-grandsons and great-granddaughters of all the man and women you stole the gold from in the first place, up the wazoo to buy back what should have been their inheritance---except for criminal confiscations of private property and an enforced side trip through the Land of Oz in 1907 and again in 1933.... and 2015....
Nobody will be alive long enough to remember the details after a hundred years.
Or so the bankers think.
Gold is only nominally better than paper.
Used as money, both are just "symbols" of value.
Both are subject to manipulation.
Both are held captive by the commodity-rigging bankers.
It's all just a shell game and sleight of hand.
A game of sticky-fingers.
Neither paper nor gold have any great intrinsic value.
That was true when the Incas ruled. It's still true now.
And the difference between gold and paper is akin to the difference between Republican and Democrat----chocolate feces or raspberry, Ma'am?
Put no faith in the vanities and idols of men.
Turn your faces away and use your brains. Think.
"Money" is a commodity like green grapes (stocks, bonds, notes) or red grapes (gold, silver, jewels).
Is it any Big Change, when both kinds of grapes are for sale, and the supply is still controlled by the same vendors?
Think. If there's not enough "money" or enough "credit" ---whose fault is it?
It has to be either the vendors or the producers of the commodity---possibly both.
If you need more wheat, you need more wheat farmers, right?
Or, you need to shake loose wheat hoarders who are holding back supplies that already exist, in order to spike prices.
It's one way or the other, because guess what? Money in all forms is just another commodity, like pork bellies and peas.
It's manufactured, produced, moved around, delivered, transferred, bought, sold, manipulated, speculated on.....like rice and soybeans, GM and GE.
So if you need more money, you need more and better bankers.
Can you build a better casino token? Produce bitcoins or buffalo chips? (Plastic ones, of course.)
Or find something better to found your "values" on.
That's how stupid all this really is. That's how brainless we have all been.
Taken in. And to the cleaners. Time and time again.
Generation after generation.
And because the bankers function on a long calendar of a hundred years or more, nobody recognizes it when the same-old-same-old rolls around again.
Well, almost nobody.
Until now.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.
  

Do You Have Eyes?


By Anna Von Reitz

This is the Belcher aka Belle Cher Coat of Arms, with its French motto obscured with my son's irreverent "don't leave home without it" quip. The actual motto is: "Loyale au Mort" --- Loyal Unto Death.
This is, historically, unquestionably, and factually, the basis for the Great Seals and Emblems of The United States of America and also the dependent Great Seals of "the" United States of America and "the" United States, too. The basic Coat of Arms generally in use during the time period between the beginning of the Protestant Reformation and through much of the 19th Century, was simply "varied" to a red, white, and blue color scheme, to allow for a new purpose and use as the National Emblems and Seals for The United States of America.
America was founded by Armoricans --- the Norman French Celts that also populated much of England. All so-called "British" Royals and Nobles since the Norman Conquest in 1066 are in fact French. Even King John's scions, the so-called "Kings of the Commonwealth" ---are French.
This should be obvious to people and should be taught in schools worldwide, but instead we are fed horse hunks and droll little stories like George Washington and the Cherry Tree, America being "discovered" by Christopher Columbus, and America being named after Italian Mapmaker Amerigo Vespucci ---instead of the obvious fact that "America" is named after the people who initially populated it, the Norman French "Armoricans".
Here's what Wikipedia has to say:
Armorica or Aremorica is the name given in ancient times to the part of Gaul between the Seine and the Loire that includes the Brittany Peninsula, extending inland to an indeterminate point and down the Atlantic Coast.[1] The toponym is based on the Gaulish phrase are-mori "on/at [the] sea", made into the Gaulish place name Aremorica (*are-mor-ika) "Place by the Sea". The suffix -ika was first used to create adjectival forms and then names (see regions such as Pays d'Ouche from Utica and Perche from Pertica). The original designation was vague, including a large part of what became Normandy in the 10th century and, in some interpretations, the whole of the coast down to the Garonne. Later, the term became restricted to Brittany.
In Breton, which belongs to the Brythonic branch of the Insular Celtic languages, along with Welsh and Cornish, "on [the] sea" is war vor (Welsh ar fôr, "f" being voiced and pronounced like English "v"), but the older form arvor is used to refer to the coastal regions of Brittany, in contrast to argoad (ar "on/at", coad "forest" [Welsh ar goed or coed "trees"]) for the inland regions.[2] The cognate modern usages suggest that the Romans first contacted coastal people in the inland region and assumed that the regional name Aremorica referred to the whole area, both coastal and inland."
Armorica, populated by French Celtic Armoricans, is on the Breton Peninsula on the sea coast facing across the English Channel. It's people are related directly to the Welsh, Cornish, and to the Irish Ruling Families. It has been one of the great sea-faring nations of the world since the time of the Romans.
Wake up. Realize that you have been fed a "bill of goods".
And not by me.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 
  

My Apologies to Kevin Annett


By Anna Von Reitz

For a long time, I wondered why Kevin Annett moved to Europe and  focused on the Roman Catholic Church--- seemingly forgetting about the Anglican Church whose sins and neglects first captured his attention in Canada. 

Coming at the same time as the banker's attacks on the Vatican, it seemed strange. I suspected Kevin Annett of perhaps being a banker's shill.  How else to explain the sudden focus on the Roman Catholic Church? 

My apologies, Kevin, and ITCCS.  

It all makes sense now.  

You began with what you discovered in Canada and with the Anglican Church, and by process of research and more testimony coming in, realized that the problem began with the Roman Pontificate---- and the Roman Catholic Church fronting for this venal pagan cult. 

Let's be very blunt so that people fully understand--- the "Roman side" of the Roman Catholic Church has practiced Satanism for centuries, and since at least the Second Century BC, the priests of Cybele (Isis, Ashtoreth, Astarte) have served as the tax and bill collectors for Rome. 

They have always worn black robes and white wigs, just like British Barristers still do.  

This ancient and profane religion practices infanticide, temple prostitution, cannibalism, tree worship, sex as a sacrament, bestiality, sodomy, pedophilia, and it worships -- literally -- the Father of All Lies.  It is a Death Cult, and its practices have always been unspeakable. 

So that's why you focused on the Roman Catholic Church, because it protected and allowed the Roman Pontificate to continue and to function behind closed doors. 

Perhaps you, like so many others, didn't realize that the Church was always "bifurcated" since the time of Constantine, and carrying along a pagan "Secular Religion" with it, the same way that a man might carry a Tape Worm. 

What else can anyone conclude, when faced with the "Doctrine of Transubstantiation" which teaches innocent people that they are literally drinking "the blood of Christ" --- an act of cannibalism and forbidden by scripture -- when they take Communion? 

My deepest apologies. 

We are on the same side, here at the end of times.  

In the days to come, we will all finally realize that the only time there is, is "now", and the only place is "here". 

And our only love is owed to our Creator and to each other. 

Godspeed, Kevin Annett, I made a mistake.  I am truly sorry.  If I had known what I know now, I would have been right there beside you, pushing and shoving, from the beginning, and without a backward glance. 

I pray that the 1.2 billion Roman Catholics will jerk awake and realize how deeply and disastrously compromised their Church has been, and find the will and inspiration to jettison the "Roman" part of it, with extreme prejudice. 

I also hope that all the efforts of these Evil-Doers seeking to infiltrate and control and use the United Nations as a new storefront --- just as they have used and abused the Roman Catholic Church--  will be quashed, and that the evils of what they have believed and what they have done in the name of Mammon, will be fully exposed. 

Let us all remember what Voltaire said about the Holy Roman Empire --- "It's not holy, not Roman, and not an Empire."   And let us all stand together against the Great Evils of corruption that have engulfed both the Churches and the Governments. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Complete and Utter Hokum from Richard, Again


By Anna Von Reitz

This is a good example of the deliberate Dis-Information and/or gross ignorance with which we must daily contend, so I am taking the opportunity to reply (in blue type) to it so that everyone else has a template for replying to such false reasoning and misunderstanding of historical fact.
Richard: 8 USC 1101 (a) 21, reading comprehension is required. State is later defined as a territory which would mean you have no rights as congress has exclusive legislative and other control over you and every facet of your life. Even a High School Student can understand this.
Anna: This is a deliberate misrepresentation of fact. The word "state" is not capitalized in the cited section and is not controlled by any later randomly chosen-from-the-list interpretation of what "state" or "State" means. Richard is the one who, as an Accountant, lacks the sophistication and reading comprehension to rightly interpret Federal Code, yet he is, like most men of his ilk, presenting himself as an expert in the subject of statutory law.
Anna: Furthermore, he misinterprets the entire purpose of Federal Code. Federal Code does not apply to anyone but Federal Citizens -- meaning Territorial United States Citizens and Municipal "citizens of the United States". Federal Code is their law, not ours. So when we declare our political status and reference it back to them, it is never for the purpose of subjecting ourselves to it. It is explicitly to hold them accountable to their law.
Anna: The only time that we have an interface of the kind he suggests with the Federales, is when we bring forward the Constitution--- which we can only do as Parties to the Federal Constitutions ---- which means, when we are acting as State Citizens.
Otherwise, we are treated to the spectacle of Federal Citizens trying to enforce constitutional agreements against themselves and they have no other Party holding the other side of the Constitutional Contract. Any "High School Student" should be able to see that.
In order to act as State Citizens we must first repudiate Federal Citizenship of all kinds and reclaim our birthright political status as State Nationals. State Nationals then have the option of joining their State Assembly and acting as State Citizens and enforcing the Constitutions, which we are owed.
Richard: Please understand there is no provision for national in the Constitution. They are Citizens! Even a High School Student can understand this.
Anna: As I have observed many times, the Constitutions do not concern themselves with us and in fact, barely mention us even by inference, except in the Preamble and Amendment X and the Bill of Rights. The subject of the Constitutions is the construction of the Federal Government, not the construction of our States of the Union, and so, the Federal Constitutions speak in terms of Federal Citizens and define the classes and kinds of Federal Citizens and doesn't mention State Citizens or State Nationals at all. Why should they?
Richard: She keeps saying a reset to 1861. As I was instructed by Ron Paul in 2015, please follow the supreme law of the land it's the law. Once the Constitution was ratified by 9 states, regardless of whether it was lawful or not, the articles were dead and anything created by and under it perished as well.
Anna: This is, again, a total misrepresentation of fact. The Constitutions did not in any way substitute for The Articles of Confederation, though that is the "chestnut" that ignorant apologists make to "explain away" The Articles of Confederation.
Anna: Any "High School Student" who ever read both sets of documents should be able to see, the Constitutions and The Articles of Confederation are completely different kinds of documents, with different subject matter, and different purposes --- and therefore, they cannot substitute one for the other --- and did not do so, though Mrs. Meyer may have told you that in Sixth Grade, simply because she was ignorant, too.
Anna: The original Confederation of States of States formed under The Articles of Confederation did all the work of what we have come to think of as the Federal Government from 1781 to 1787, when the Federal Constitution split off some of those duties under new power-sharing agreements and delegated specific enumerated Powers to the States of America organized under The Articles of Confederation, the Queen (Territorial) and the Pope (Municipal). That is what the actual historical records demonstrate --- not a destruction of The Articles of Confederation in 1787.
Anna: The Articles of Confederation were not "set aside" until 1860 when the Confederation broke apart as a result of the Secession of the Southern Members. And that is why the South called itself "The Confederate States of America" while the North continued to operate as the "States of America".
Anna: And as for "she" demanding "reset" to 1861 --- it's not me that demands that outcome, its the Roman Civil Law of the Municipal United States Government that demands that outcome, and in any case, the Constitutions all pre-date 1861 by many country miles, so it is not as if the Constitutions go away as a result of having to clean up this Mess that people like Richard have caused.
Richard: Paul think about how many times over the years 2015 she has made claims to her status by different signatures, titles, verbal claims including her husband's status and never with any proof for authority to do so. This was first noted beginning in 2015 when I first started working with Union States Assembly and shared her rantings with the Flag Officer's name given to me by Jim. then I presented Them years later I introduced her Smoking Gun discovery to the Flag Officers and she couldn't provide any proofs for who she claimed to be and her husband as Head of States. This is when I was told to walk away from her and help others to do the same. 2015 was when I started conversing with Ron Paul and he introduced me to Rand.
Anna: I have in fact presented the Belcher Coat of Arms and any fool can visually and directly see that all the Great Seals of this country and of both the United States and the United States of America, are part of our Coat of Arms Array. Just as you can recognize your own flag on sight and without question, our National Coat of Arms is recognizable on sight and without question as a Belle Cher Coat of Arms. That is, in fact, the way that nations are meant to identify themselves in the international jurisdiction of the sea, and the idea that our "Flag Officers" have grown so ignorant or so corrupt that they don't recognize or know the meaning of the Seal Array that they are themselves operating under, is not credible. If you can see our war flag, you can also see our peace flag and our seals. And I do say, "ours", both in the familial and the national sense, as these emblems were granted by the Belle Chers for the perpetual use of our new nation whenever it conducts business in international jurisdiction and they are still in use today.
Anna: American sovereignty in the international jurisdiction (not national---international) depends directly upon the sovereignty of the Belle Chers, established during the Norman Conquest, and the proof of that is plainly stated by the impress of our seals, flags, and trademarks, which are visually apparent and which have been standing firmly on the international public record for centuries. I need no other proof of the facts beyond what is set in front of your noses, just like the American Flag doesn't need any explanations, and I can lawfully demand the resignation of every Flag Officer who fails to answer to his Flag and to his Seal. Just go ask your JAG Officers about that little fact and stop making excuses for gross insubordination.
Anna: As for Ron Paul, if he really had a clue what was going on after 30 years in "Congress", he would have proven so long before this. Ditto, ditto, his son Rand. I am sure that they are good men with good intentions, but the same can be said for a great many people who have served this run amok government without ever truly coming to grips with what is wrong with it.
Richard: I learned in short order what I was taught by my Jesuit mentor and verified by Ron Paul. "to be successful in international business, commerce and law you must know the rules of the King and Queen and never to cross their BAR".
Anna: Ah, well, now we get to the interesting part. Richard was trained by Jesuits. Go figure, just don't figure too long.
Anna: The BAR of the British Queen has no natural authority in America, except in the British Territorial United States and in connection with those few delegated "Powers" the Queen is entrusted to exercise for us. This was made very, very explicit in 1819 with the passage of The Titles of Nobility Amendment, which prohibits Bar Members from serving in any public office of our actual government. So when you see Bar Members involved in anything, you know for sure that you are dealing with the Territorial United States Government or the Municipal United States Government, and not with our actual American Government at all. Period.
Anna: And, so far as that is concerned, we have the ability to dance over the BAR whenever we wish to do so. They are nothing but shipping clerks and bill collectors for foreign entities, which have been grossly misdirecting their activities on our shores in Breach of Trust and without any justifiable authority.
Richard: Therefore, it's simple when you apply the simple rules of Contract Law, Arbitration, Proof of Claims for who promised to deliver, and who didn't receive what was promised. Remedy is decided by the Arbitrator and is binding and final. It's the Law and never had to cross the BAR and or to interface with a member of the BAR. It's the Law! Their Law!
Anna: It is also "their" law that a clause imposing Binding Arbitration on Both Parties must be agreed to by both Parties as part of the original contract, and no such clause exists. Richard is, again, talking through his hat. You can comb through all three of the Federal Constitutions as long as you like and never find any such obligation binding the Queen or the Pope, nor, indeed, The United States of America.
Anna: What Richard is mistaking as "the" government is in fact a commercial corporation and it is subject to international law and its own published Public Policies. It's Public Policies can change as quickly as its Board of Directors --- that is, the members of "Congress" --- can vote. So if they agree to bind themselves to arbitration as a private corporate matter, they are free to do so and free to publish that as part of their Public Policy. So what?
Anna: Whatever restitution their corporation makes is paid out in their own Federal Reserve Note military script, and that script is issued on the victim's own credit. So what Richard is promoting is in fact a scam that -- instead of providing any actual relief or remedy --just digs people deeper into debt and places more dubious claims upon their own assets.
Anna: When I say "you can't get there from here" I mean it. The only way that you can get actual relief and remedy is by returning home to the land and soil jurisdiction of your State, acting as one of the People, and enforcing the Constitutions that people like Richard like to talk about ----without actually obeying. If anyone needs any other or better example of this same sanctimonious hypocrisy, just tune in and listen to Nancy Pelosi, now declaring her duty to the Constitution, which she has ignored for the better part of thirty years.
Richard: At one time Anna could have join us seeking the same endgame (making people as whole as possible) but we soon believed because there was no money in it for profit, she couldn't debrief herself of what she is being told/taught to say and write, maybe she is too dense, or it could be she is a turned Agent.
Anna: As I have already pointed out, nothing that Richard and Phil and their unknown "Flag Officer" Buddies are promoting provides any actual remedy to anyone, much less makes anyone whole. It just digs the debt hole deeper for us all, devalues what "serves as" currency, and further victimizes everyone involved, including those seeking to benefit themselves. This same diabolical reasoning is self-evident in the Jesuit's beloved Hegelian Dialectic, their love of sinning by omission, and the grotesque hypocrisy displayed by some members of their Order.
Richard: As the years have passed she has delivered nothing and some that have followed her advice are in jail only to be abandon by her and she just moves on in her self-serving ways promoting another smoking gun.
Anna: As the years have progressed, we have continued to make progress: the Pope's and the Queen's iniquities are being exposed on a daily basis on the worldwide stage, and people in foreign countries around the globe are being awakened, just as Americans are waking up, too. All except Richard and Phil and the other Dunderheads calling themselves "Flag Officers".
Anna: And again, the Big Lie is told, that people associated with me landed in jail and that I "abandoned" them. On one side of his Jesuit-trained mouth, Richard is trying to threaten people and scare them and with the other side of his mouth he is telling an insidious lie. As everyone, including Paul, has cause to know --- the Colorado Nine didn't take my advice and I split with them because of it. I knew that they were bent on a dangerous and incorrect course that was in fact the result of advice (like Richard's) given to them by a federal insurance agent, Michael R. Hamilton.
Anna: The entire history of that debacle is recorded in my blog archive, with the summation being posted as Article 484, back when I was arguing with the Colorado Nine, and especially with Bruce Doucette, and flatly telling them that the court they were addressing was foreign and not to mess with it.
Anna: I have since given that same advice to numerous others who have not heeded my advice, either, and who have--predictably-- reaped the same whirlwind. Except for being misled by people like Richard Schaum and Michael R. Hamilton--- and for indoctrination of incorrect information as children--- I have no idea why people don't listen, but they regularly don't, and they regularly get chewed up by these foreign courts as a result.
Anna: And as for the "Smoking Gun" being referenced, everyone should know that Richard was a senior accounting consultant for the Department of Administration. When I first "met" him via correspondence, I inquired about the American National Credit we are owed. Up until that point, it had never occurred to him (as a senior accounting consultant to the Department of Administration) that in a debt-credit system, all transactions are zero-sum transactions, so that every debt including the "US" National Debt results in an answering credit.... so if the "US" has this humongous debt, where is our National Credit?
Anna: Please bear in mind that when I say "our National Credit" I am not referring to any credit owed to any species of Federal Citizen. I am referring to credit owed to rank-and-file Americans who provided their goods and services in "equitable exchange" (???) for I.O.U.s issued by the Federales.
Anna: It is embarrassing (even for me as a Second Party) to observe that someone hired in the capacity of a senior accounting consultant for the DOA had to have these facts revealed to him and that he continues to characterize these obvious facts as a "Smoking Gun". The only thing smoking about it is that this circumstance has been unaccounted for, for generations, by people like Richard, who were supposed to be expert accountants.
Anna: One can only suppose that, as Richard gratuitously suggests about me ---the font of his knowledge--- that he is rather dim, or rather dishonest, and definitely ungrateful. Either way, his expertise as an accountant is apparently less than adequate, and his forays into law and history are even worse.
Richard: K I S S and follow the law.
Anna: There is nothing "simple" about this situation, except the fact that Americans are not Federal Citizens, and have been unconscionably and with malicious self-interest mis-characterized and mis-identified as such, almost from the cradle.
Anna: There is also a definite issue of "law" here -- as in which law applies? Federal Code applies to Federal Citizens. Public Law applies to Americans. And therein lies the Great Divide. The sooner everyone comes to terms with what "law" actually applies to them, and which courts actually have any right to speak to them, the better.
Anna: The central problem is now and has long been, knowing who you are, knowing what you are owed, knowing what law applies to you, and being able to recognize your own courts and your own government as opposed to the foreign subcontractors that have been making themselves at home and spending our assets and credit at their leisure. The problem is also embodied by people like Richard.
Anna: It would not be going too far to say that Richard barely knows his rump from roses about any subject including accounting, but he nonetheless puts himself forward as an expert on everything including law, history, and whose family Coat of Arms stands as the Great Seal of our nation.
Anna: The problem isn't that he's ignorant. All of us are ignorant of one thing or another. The problem is that men like Richard cling to their ignorance and encourage others to do the same, to the detriment of all. The problem is that our whole country is impeded and obstructed from making needed progress by men like him, spewing gossip, wheedling, and making "mistakes" that cost innocent people their actual birthrights.
Anna: Remember the Biblical story of Jacob and Esau, how Jacob --whose name means "the Liar"--- cheated his brother out of his birthright for a bowl of porridge. The Enemies of Mankind are intent on offering you all the same kind of deal. If you will accept their pieces of paper, drawn against your own assets and credit, as an "equitable exchange" for your gold, silver, land, blood, and bones, then they will gladly accept and encourage your action.
Anna: This is precisely the same kind of "deal" that Richard and Phil and the Flag Officers are offering all of you. Admit, by filing for "benefits" from their in-house arbitration, that you are a British Territorial United States Citizen, and you can have all the debt notes you want. Why should they care? It simply puts you deeper in debt and costs them nothing at all but the printing costs. Is it plausible that again, as with the issue of our National Credit, a sleepy old Grandma from Big Lake knows the accounting and Richard, the DOA Accounting Consultant, does not? In other words, how dumb can he be and how often, before we all smell a Big, Fat, Rat?
Anna: Finally, the same circumstance ---admitting to being a British Territorial (Commonwealth) United States Citizen by signing up for these purported benefits of arbitration, (but in fact all paid for by you on your assets and your credit) steals your birthright from you by placing your land and other assets in the Queen's hands, subject to Her debts, and Her disposition of your assets.
Anna: That's the real theft and injury involved. If you want to access some of your own credit, that's fine and well, your own business. But when you can only do so by giving away the farm, that's another matter entirely.
Anna: What Richard and Phil are advocating is in fact a form of crime being exercised against you --- a fraud combined with substantive coercion-- essentially, a bribe (access to your own credit) using something that is already yours by rights (access to your own credit) to compel you to accept the loss of your birthright as an American --- your land, your home, your very name and lawful identity---all sacrificed, because these same crooks are illegally and unlawfully and immorally blocking your access to your own credit, and holding it as a ransom.
Anna: It's like Uncle Ernie saying, "Come here, little girl, and I'll give you a piece of candy...." when the "candy" he's intent upon is of an entirely different kind.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.