By Anna Von Reitz
During the first Trump Administration when Charlie Ward and some of the Q Anons first aired the idea of "restoring the Republic" by hijacking it, I told them that no, they couldn't do that, because they, as British Subjects, don't have the standing required.
The Federal Republic was created by the States of America which was created by and through the States of the Union which are created directly by the people of this country, not the federal "persons" of this country.
British sailors have an annoying habit of stumbling ashore and trying to claim land assets for their King, even though they have no standing to do so. Even after the "Doctrine of Discovery" has been thoroughly debunked, they still give it the Ye Olde College Try.
I told them the truth -- several times -- and watched while they continued to try to snowball this Substitution Scheme into reality.
They didn't listen to a single word, until this week, when the U.S. Supreme Court told them the same thing that I told them almost a decade ago: you don't have the standing of a lawful government, and so, you can't possibly restore the American Federal Republic.
On top of that, you are British Subjects and British Subjects can't staff American institutions without a specific delegation of authority, which you lack.
Their question: who would have authority to give us that delegation?
The same poor people who hired them to provide enumerated services under The Constitution of the United States of America:
the American State Citizens, Officers of our State Assemblies, who are known collectively as "the People" of each State.
Key among the decisions facing our State Citizens and their Congressional Delegations, will be reform of the Federal Government, what to keep, what to lose, and what to change. It's a daunting prospect.
The Federal Republic and the States of America Confederation both failed; can we recognize the weaknesses that caused their collapse and avoid these in the future?
Can we analyze the strength of the Federation that allowed it to survive for a hundred and sixty years --- and build that strength into the rest of our government during our long-delayed reconstruction process?
Ultimately, will we reconstruct, deconstruct, or start over and do something that has never been tried?
This is uniquely American business and it remains for Americans to decide, no matter how eagerly our British Territorial Service Providers leap at the chance to do it for us--- and charge us for this new service, of course.
The foreign Federal Subcontractors have defaulted upon their service contracts by failure to provide the services we agreed to receive from them, and just as importantly, have imposed services upon us that we never asked for, never needed, and never wanted.
Our Final Judgment and Civil Orders issued in April of 2014 sums the situation up nicely; after seven (7) years of Due Process, both the British Crown Commercial Corporations and the Roman Municipal Corporations were found guilty of Gross Breach of Trust and Violation of their Service Contracts, together with their Principals.
This was established by unrebutted sworn testimony that was widely published and distributed to all three branches of their "federalized state" and federal government administrations over a period of seven years, and also by abundant public records.
The only thing that has changed since 2014 is that the power of that Due Process and the findings related to it, are finally catching up to the institutions and personnel responsible for defrauding, impersonating, and misrepresenting the people they were hired to protect and serve in "good faith".
There have been numerous trials for treason executed by military tribunals acting under British Admiralty Law, taken against Federal Dual Citizens; reportedly, some have suffered capital punishment which is always the dread and summary result of martial law in any jurisdiction, especially the sea.
It wasn't our desire or even intent that anyone should die over this. We did not mandate summary judgement or capital punishment. We sought administrative correction and invoked our own Common Law to accomplish that end, returning our Final Judgment and Civil Order to the U.S. Supreme Court as a foreign court judgment from our concurrent jurisdiction(s).
In our view, the crimes against us, though grievous in the extreme, are property crimes in the nature of illegal impersonation, illegal confiscation, credit theft and illegal takings prohibited by both remaining federal constitutions --- and property crimes should not be paid in blood or with the loss of human life.
In our reasonable and peaceable view, the administration needed to be corrected, restitution made, and all brought back within the bounds of the traditional Constitutional framework, with our own Federation of States (the "Delegator") performing the duties of the Federal Republic (the absent "Delegatee") until the lawful State Assemblies and State Citizens can address the greater questions summarized herein.
This is not only the logical solution, it's the solution mandated by contract law and common sense. It is, in fact, an Operation of Law: if one acting under delegation is unable to perform, the duty reverts to the delegator, and does not in some magical way, become the duty of other parties.
The true treason was committed by Abraham Lincoln acting in April of 1863, when he assigned the duties of our Federal Republic to the U.S. Army and the U.S. Federal Congress, thereby pretending the lack of a competent civilian government -- and ultimately resulting in the adoption of a foreign municipal subcontractor to fulfill the role of a civilian government -- a role naturally belonging to and usurped from the American People.
In our view, Abraham Lincoln is dead and beyond the judgement of this generation; let the dead bury the dead, and let us now take honest stock of the situation.
The idea of a British Crown incorporated version of "a" Federal Republic replacing our failed American Federal Republic has been definitively shot down. That's good. That's the way it ought to be. Whatever else comes forward, the fate of the American Federal Republic lies with the Americans, not British Subjects.
The Municipal Corporation serving as a substitute civilian government has been bankrupted. That's also as it should be, though they arguably don't deserve the protection of the corporate veil and their debts should be assigned to their Principals, not ours.
From our standpoint, their debts are Odious Debt: that is, debts created by some means of fraud, of which the victims were unaware, and did not benefit from.
We, and our People, were the scapegoats and victims from April of 1863 to today.
Although the situation is still largely confused in the minds of the general public and even among many federal officers, the U.S. Supreme Court is beginning to bow to the facts and the Law, and to ineluctable logic.
The same logic that led me to tell Charlie Ward they couldn't gin up a new "Federal" Republic using British Crown actors a decade ago, has prevailed. And it only took ten years to reach that conclusion.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
October 30th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
