Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Sunday, March 24, 2019

The Truth About "Southern Poverty Law Center"

By Anna Von Reitz

No doubt some of you remember the Hit Pieces issued by SPLC trying to mislabel me (yes, me of all people) a "sovereign citizen" --- to which I replied that the man writing the article never interviewed me (was lying outright) and that the Southern Poverty Law Center isn't "Southern", isn't concerned about "Poverty" and as far as I can determine isn't a "Law Center" either. 

But I digress.  Recent exposure of the slimy organization reveals that it has a budget of half a billion dollars --- more than a small country.  That in itself should raise eyebrows. If the "mission" is to help solve the southern poverty problem, imagine what half a billion invested in jobs and scholarships and actual help for poor people in Alabama could do?  

But there is more....  Turns out that the King Pins in SPLC lost $60 million in court for telling more lies and slandering and libeling other people besides me.  

This was a sore point with the Board of Directors for some reason, given that they have made it their business to slander and misrepresent others for decades in an effort to whip up fears of Jim Crow and increase donations. 

Here's a quote lifted from the ZeroHedge report from a former SPLC staffer: 

"“Outside of work," recalls Bob Moser of his days working for the organization [Southern Poverty Law Center], "we spent a lot of time drinking and dishing in Montgomery bars and restaurants about … the hyperbolic fund-raising appeals, and the fact that, though the center claimed to be effective in fighting extremism, ‘hate’ always continued to be on the rise, more dangerous than ever, with each year’s report on hate groups. ‘The S.P.L.C.—making hate pay,’ we’d say."  

Just sayin'.  If promoting baseless fear propaganda is part of your stock-and-trade  ---- presenting innocent people and organizations as threats, racists, and "haters" so as to plump up your own coffers to half a billion dollars --- you should expect to get sued and be prepared to take it in the teeth. 

So the Board fired their long-time fearless leader and co-founder, Morris Dees, just as the organization faced up to allegations of internal sexual misconduct.  Now his successors and lieutenants are fleeing the proverbial kitchen, too.  

Who knows?  Maybe SPLC will finally get some new leadership and upgrade their behavior and ethical standards to something above snake belly?  Quoting the Washington Examiner article cited by ZeroHedge: 

The only thing worse than a snarling partisan activist is a slimy conman who merely pretends to be one. -Washington Examiner 


See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Who to Trust?

By Anna Von Reitz

I often get asked who among the various sources should be trusted as reliable --- and the answer is that none of us get it 100% right a 100% of the time. Including me.
Nor are we all "perfect" in all venues and respects, because everyone that I mention has their specialties and tends to work in some particular jurisdiction of the law or arena of historical inquiry. Some are focused on private relief and others are more focused on general relief/restoration of a proper lawful government and still others are focused on some particular historical research period.
So when I make a recommendation like this it is with a built in caveat emptor, in that you have to know or learn where the pieces of the puzzle fit and define what your own needs are.
In terms of people/sources who reliably make the Good Faith Effort besides my own team and who dig up good nuggets of Truth with the consistency of Truffle Pigs, I would include [in no particular order]:
Rod Class -- PAGs and Administrative Law
Kelby Smith of HISAdvocates -- Private Living
Jean Keating -- Maritime and Admiralty Law
Mark Emery -- Private Living
Kurt Kallenbach - Paramount Claims of Life, History, DNA
Romley Stewart - History, DOG LATIN, Fraud Investigation
Neo - Statutory Law and Practical Quick Fixes
Peter of England - Private Banking, Current Events
SEDM - Federal Bureaucracy, Private Living, Forms
Boris - Private Living
Jordan Maxwell - History, Birth Certificates
Robert David Steele - Natural Law
Field McConnell - Military, Administrative History
Neil Warren - Lawful Banking (England)
Richard Cornforth -- Statutory Law, Legal History
John Trowbridge - History, Statutory Law, Constitution
Mary Croft - Government, History, Attitude Adjustment
Brent Winters - History of Law, Constitutions, Common Law
Freedom School - IRS, History, Statutory Law
Isaac Witham - Early American History, Treaties
Michael Kearns - Early American History, Treaties
SPLSPro -- British Equity Law
Emily Windsor - Cragg - British History, British Law, Monarchy.
Republic of Texas - IRS and Tax Court, Land Patents
No doubt I am forgetting very worthy groups and people at this moment and will think of them with a big "ouch!" as they (or their fans) call me to task. Please don't think that just because someone's name doesn't appear on The List that it is any strike against them per se. This is just an Off-the-Top-of-My-Head list of some of the many people and organizations who are contemporaries providing insights via websites, videos, teleconferences, or publications and who have consistently provided solid information in these subject areas.


See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

An Apology to Robert

By Anna Von Reitz

Most of the time I am patient and explain things as well as I can and as often as necessary, but once in a while, I lose my temper --- just get worn down and pop off at someone who hits me at the wrong moment with something that has been a cause of irritation for days or months or even years.  This recently happened with Robert and I would like to apologize.  

He wrote to me about the issue of  "Affidavits of Truth".   He assumed that I was using Certificates to replace Affidavits and referenced an article of mine where I explained that living people who are acting in their unincorporated Lawful Person capacity can't make Affidavits ----- only corporations (like franchises) or officers of corporations can make Affidavits.  The rest of us must label our presentations as "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit".  

This is part of the Court Rules and part of the reason that our Testimony doesn't get heard in Court.  Another reason is that too many people file their paperwork with the Court Clerk and don't file it with the Prosecutor directly and with the District Attorney.  

They aren't obliged to accept your Testimony, read it, react to it or respond to it until and unless you label it properly for what it is and present it to them.  Directly. 

There is a difference between an "Affidavit" and "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit", just as there is a difference between a "State of State" and an actual "State".  

I get worn out trying to teach people who don't read things closely enough to notice these differences for themselves, and I can get really frustrated with those who still don't notice these things AFTER I have pointed them out. 

If a man asserts that he is operating exclusively as a Lawful Person and is owed exemption and exoneration, but then turns around and submits an "Affidavit" instead of a "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit" he has presented conflicting information.   

He is claiming to act in one capacity and then, by submitting an "Affidavit of Truth" instead of "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit" is demonstrating that he is in fact operating in a completely different capacity.   It's like a Colonel in the Army showing up in full dress uniform and claiming that he's a civilian.

If we are going to deal competently with the many issues facing this country, we must all learn to read things much more closely, with more attention to what the words actually say and how things are labeled and named.  

So, I am sorry for losing my temper, Robert.  It was just the straw that broke the camel's back after months of trying to draw people's attention to similar facts:

A State is not a State of State. 
A State of State is not a STATE OF STATE.
An Affidavit is not Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit.
A United States Citizen is not a Citizen of the United States. 
An American State National is not a US Citizen. 
The United State [Unincorporated] is not the United States, Inc. 
The United States of America [Unincorporated] is not the USA, Inc. 
Indictments are not Presentments.  
A Republican State is not a Republic, etc., etc., etc... 

As confusing as the rats have made this, I actually have great sympathy with people who are threading their way through the maze and who care enough to do so.  I'm sorry, Robert.  Please forgive me for being Grandma Grump.


See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Third Sunday In Lent

Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's Year

The Introit of this day's Mass, which begins with the word Oculi, is the prayer of a soul imploring deliverance from the snares of the devil:
INTROIT My eyes are ever towards the Lord: for he shall pluck my feet out of the snare: look thou upon me, and have mercy on me, for I am alone and poor. To thee, O Lord, have I lifted up my soul: in thee, O my God, I put my trust: let me not be ashamed. (Fs. XXIV.) Glory be to the Father and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.
COLLECT  We beseech Thee, Almighty God, regard the desires of the humble, and stretch forth the right hand of Thy majesty to be our defense. Through our Lord Jesus Christ Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee, in the Unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end, Amen.
EPISTLE (Ephes. V. 1-9.) Brethren, be ye followers of God, as most dear children; and walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath delivered himself for us, an oblation and a sacrifice to God, for an odor of sweetness. But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not so much as be named among you, as becometh saints; nor obscenity, nor foolish talking, nor scurrility, which is to no purpose; but rather giving of thanks: for know ye this, and understand, that no fornicator, nor unclean, nor covetous person, which is a serving of idols, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no man deceive you with vain words; for because of these things cometh the anger of God upon the children of unbelief. Be ye not therefore partakers with them. For you were heretofore darkness; but now light in the Lord. Walk, then, as children of the light: for the fruit of the light is in all goodness, and justice, and truth.
EXPLANATION The apostle requires us to imitate God, as good children imitate their father in well-doing and in well-wishing; besides he declares that all covetousness, fornication, all disgraceful talk and equivocal jokes should be banished from Christian meetings, even that such things should not be so much as mentioned among us; because these vices unfailingly deprive us of heaven. He admonishes us not to let ourselves be deceived by the seducing words of those who seek to make these vices appear small, nothing more than pardonable human weaknesses; those who speak thus are the children of darkness and of the devil, they bring down the wrath of God upon themselves, and all who assent to their words. A Christian, a child of light, that is, of faith, should regard as a sin that which faith and conscience tell him is such, and must live according to their precepts and not by false judgment of the wicked. Should any one seek to lead you away, ask yourself, my Christian soul, whether you would dare appear with such a deed before the judgment-seat of God. Listen to the voice of your conscience, and let it decide, whether that which you are expected to do is good or bad, lawful or unlawful.
ASPIRATION  Place Thy fear, O God, before my mouth, that I may utter no vain, careless, much less improper and scandalous words, which may be the occasion of sin to my neighbor. Strengthen me, that I may not be deceived by flattering words, and become faithless to Thee.
GOSPEL (Luke XI. 14.-28.) At that time, Jesus was casting out a devil, and the same was dumb. And when he had cast out the devil, the dumb spoke, and the multitudes were in admiration at it. But some of them said: He casteth out devils by Beelzebub the prince of devils. And others tempting, asked of him a sign from heaven. But he seeing their thoughts, said to them: Every kingdom divided against itself shall be brought to desolation, and house upon house shall fall. And if Satan also be divided against himself, how shall his kingdom stand? because you say, that through Beelzebub I cast out devils. Now if I cast out devils by Beelzebub, by whom do your children cast them out? Therefore they shall be your judges. But if I by the finger of God cast out devils, doubtless the kingdom of God is come upon you. When a strong man armed keepeth his court, those things which he possesseth are in peace; but if a stronger than he come upon him, and overcome him, he will take away all his armor wherein he trusted, and will distribute his spoils. He that is not with me, is against me; and he that gathereth not with me, scattereth. When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through places without water, seeking rest; and not finding, he saith, I will return into my house whence I came out: and when he is come, he findeth it swept and garnished. Then he goeth, and taketh with him seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and entering in they dwell there. And the last state of that man becomes worse than the first. And it came to pass, as he spoke these things, a certain woman from the crowd, lifting up her voice, said to him: Blessed is the womb that bore thee, and the paps that gave thee suck. But he said: Yea rather blessed are they who hear the word of God, and keep it.
Can a man be really possessed of a devil?
It is the doctrine of the Catholic Church that the evil spirit most perniciously influences man in a twofold manner: by enticing his soul to sin, and then influencing his body which he often entirely or partially possesses, manifesting himself by madness, convulsions, insanity, etc. Many texts of Scripture, and the writings of the Fathers speak of this possession. St. Cyprian writes: "We can expel the swarms of impure spirits, who for the ruin of the soul, enter into the bodies of men, and we can compel them to acknowledge their presence, by the force of powerful words." Possession takes place by the permission of God either for trial or as a punishment for sin committed, (I. Cor. V. 5.) and the Church from her Head, Jesus, who expelled so many devils, has received the power of casting them out as He did. (Mark XVI. 17.; Acts V. 16., VIII. 6. 7., XVI. 18. &c.) She however warns her ministers, the priests, who by their ordination have received the power to expel the evil spirits, to distinguish carefully between possession and natural sickness, that they may not be deceived, (Rit. ROM. §. 3. §. 5-10.) and the faithful should guard against looking upon every unusual, unhealthy appearance as an influence of Satan, and should give no ear to impostors, but in order not to be deceived, should turn to an experienced physician or to their pastor.
What is understood by a dumb devil?
The literal meaning of this is the evil enemy, who some times so torments those whom he possesses that they lose the power of speech; in a spiritual sense, we may understand it to mean the shame which the devil takes away from the sinner, when he commits the sin, but gives back again, as false shame, before confession, so that the sinner conceals the sin, and thereby falls deeper.
How does Christ still cast out dumb devils?
By His grace with which He inwardly enlightens the sinner, so that he becomes keenly aware that the sins which he has concealed in confession, will one day be known to the whole world, and thus encourages him to overcome his false shame. - "Be not ashamed to confess to one man," says St. Augustine, "that which you were not ashamed to do with one, perhaps, with many." Consider these words of the same saint: "Sincere confession subdues vice, conquers the evil one, shuts the door of hell, and opens the gates of paradise."
How did Christ prove, that He did not cast out devils by Beelzebub?
By showing that the kingdom of Satan could not stand, if one evil spirit were cast out by another; that they thus reproached their own sons who also cast out devils, and had not been accused of doing so by power from Beelzebub; by His own life and works which were in direct opposition to the devil, and by which the devil's works were destroyed. - There is no better defence against calumny than an innocent life, and those who are slandered, find no better consolation than the thought of Christ who, notwithstanding His sanctity and His miracles, was not secure against calumniation.
What is meant by the finger of God?
The power of God, by which Christ expelled the evil spirits, proved himself God, and the promised Redeemer.
Who is the strong man armed?
The evil one is so called, because he still retains the power and intellect of the angels, and, practiced by long experience, seeks in different ways to injure man if God permits.
How is the devil armed?
With the evil desires of men, with the perishable riches, honors, and pleasures of this world, with which he entices us to evil, deceives us, and casts us into eternal fire.
Who is the stronger one who took away the devil's armor?
Christ the Lord who came into this world that He might destroy the works and the kingdom of the devil, to expel the prince of darkness, (John XII. 31.) and to redeem us. from his power. "The devil," says St. Anthony, "is like a dragon caught by the Lord with the fishing-hook of the cross, tied with a halter like a beast of burden, chained like a fugitive slave, and his lips pierced through with a ring, so that he may not devour any of the faithful. Now he sighs, like a miserable sparrow, caught by Christ and turned to derision, and thrown under the feet of the Christians. He who flattered himself that he would possess the whole orbit of the earth, behold, he has to yield!"
Why does Christ say: He who is not with me, is against me?
These words were intended in the first place for the Pharisees who did not acknowledge Christ as the Messiah, would not fight with Him against Satan's power, but rather held the people back from reaching unity of faith and love of Christ. Like the Pharisees, all heretical teachers who, by their false doctrines, draw the faithful from communion with Christ and His Church, are similar to the devil, the father of heresy and lies. May all those, therefore, who think they can serve Christ and the world at the same time, consider that between truth and falsehood, between Christ and the world, there is no middle path; that Christ requires decision, either with Him, or against Him , either eternal happiness with Him, or without Him, everlasting misery.
Who are understood by the dry places through which the evil spirit wanders and finds no rest?
"The dry places without water," says St. Gregory, "are the hearts of the just, who by the force of penance have drained the dampness of carnal desires." In such places the evil -one indeed finds no rest, because there his malice finds no sympathy, and his wicked will no satisfaction.
Why does the evil spirit say: I will return into my house?
Because he is only contented there where he is welcomed and received: those who have purified their heart by confession, and driven Satan from it, but labor not to amend, again lose the grace of the Sacraments by sin, and thus void of virtue and grace, offer a beautiful and pleasant dwelling to the devil.
Why is it said: The last state becomes worse than the first?
Because a relapse generally draws more sins with it, and so it is said: the devil will return with seven other spirits more wicked than himself, by which may be understood the seven deadly sins, because after a relapse into sin conversion to God becomes more difficult, as a repeated return of the same sickness makes it harder to regain health; because by repetition sin easily becomes a habit and renders conversion almost impossible; because repeated relapses are followed by blindness of intellect, hardness of heart, and in the end eternal damnation.
Why did the woman lift up her voice?
This was by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost to shame the Pharisees who, blinded by pride, neither professed nor acknowledged the divinity of Christ, whilst this humble woman not only confessed Jesus as God, but praised her who carried Him, whom heaven and earth cannot contain. Consider the great dignity of the Blessed Virgin, Mother of the Son of God, and hear her praises from the holy Fathers. St. Cyril thus salutes her: "Praise to thee, Blessed Mother of God: for thou art virginity itself, the sceptre of the true faith!" and St. Chrysostom: "Hail, O Mother, the throne, the glory, the heaven of the Church!" St. Ephrem: "Hail, only hope of the Fathers, herald of the apostles, glory of the martyrs, joy of the saints, and crown of the virgins, because of thy vast glory, and inaccessible light!"
Why did Christ call those happy who hear the word of God and keep it?
Because, as has been already said, it is not enough for salvation to hear the word of God, but it must also be practiced. Because Mary, the tender Mother of Jesus, did this most perfectly, Christ terms her more happy in it, than in having conceived, borne, and nursed Him.
SUPPLICATION O Lord Jesus! true Light of the world, enlighten the eyes of my soul, that I may never be induced by the evil one to conceal a sin, through false shame, in the confessional, that on the day of general judgment my sibs may not be published to the whole world. Strengthen me, O Jesus, that I may resist the arms of the devil by a penitent life, and especially by scorning the fear of man and worldly considerations, and guard against lapsing into sin, that I may not be lost, but through Thy merits maybe delivered from, all dangers and obtain heaven

Saturday, March 23, 2019

The Mueller Nuthin

By Anna Von Reitz

At last, the vaunted Mueller Investigation is over.

After a gazillion dollars spent on this politically motivated nonsense, we now know what most of us knew two (2) years ago: no collusion with Russia.

I am so disgusted by this whole waste of money and time and public discussion spent on this, that for once, words fail Grandma.

This should go down in our country's history as something far worse than Watergate, and all of it focused on one man in an attempt to overturn an election.

If we never had any other example set before us as a valid reason to upchuck the whole private corporate election system and the continuance of any control of the purse-strings by political lobbyists, this one should suffice.


See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Helpful Forms 2

By Anna Von Reitz

We have discovered and confirmed (thanks largely to Kurtis Kallenbach) an outrageous and long-standing ploy that has been used by the Roman Catholic Church to establish claims to our DNA and as a result, improper claims of ownership interest in our bodies.  

To counteract that, we have set up another Public Form called a Paramount Claim which settles the "interest" in our DNA.  

I know, everyone is groaning --- not another form to add to the list!---- but this one is important as it appears to be the basis that the vermin use to lay hold of our bodies and incarcerate us, as well as a foundation to the claims of the Municipal Government to "own" us.  

Please see example attached:

If people don't know the exact details of when and where their parents were "wedded" ---- that information can be bypassed. 

New Helpful Forms and Examples

By Anna Von Reitz

There are basically two kinds of records people need to have to prove and enforce their identity and standing --- public and private.  

Birth Certificates and BC Witness Statements are private documents.  The BC for most people should never be recorded, though the Witness Statements can and should be so long as the Witnesses don't object.  

Whether you record the Witness Statements or not is more or less a personal choice, but bear in mind that once they are recorded they can't be "lost" as easily as they can be lost in a house fire, flood, or other happenstance. 

I recently made up an example of a BC Witness Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit that can be "motorized" as an online form and red-lined as the others have been for people to add their own information.  Or simply posted as an example for people to follow in constructing their own document.  

What "Virgo Triad" Means:

By Anna Von Reitz

The nom de guerre adopted by the Federale Disinfo Agent calling herself "Virgo Triad" literally means "Taxing Pitchfork".

If you buy her crappola, that's exactly where you will end up, too ---- on the end of their "taxing pitchfork"!

A friend just dug that one out and it shows how these people choose their fake names with malice aforethought---- always thinking that they are too smart and "witty" for their insider jokes to be detected.

Well, from Karen and I ----- hahahahahahah!

PAGs Are Wonderful, But No Solid Answer Yet

By Anna Von Reitz

Many of you have been encouraged by recent advances made by Rod Class and others to champion our cause in the foreign court system.  A word of caution is advised.  Here's why.  

The PAGs  (Private Attorney Generals) came into being in the wake of the Civil War and are an "Office" created by the old Territorial United States Federal Code. 

The first word of caution is this: although the Territorial United States and its franchises operated as "States of States" do  "more or less" honor the old Federal Code, they are under no strict obligation to do so.  

This is because the corporations that gave rise to that body of Federal Code were bankrupted and the last of them went out of business existence in 1999 and there has been no official action by any organization since then to wholesale "adopt" the Federal Code.  

Thus, when people go into these courts and argue based on Federal Code, they are depending on the Good Faith and Honor of those operating the court to continue to honor the old Federal Code --- and it completely Quixotic whether they do so or not.  

The only portion of the old Federal Code that was adopted and that these judges are obligated to enforce is the 1934 Amendment to the Trading With the Enemy Act.  

The Territorial United States Government and the Municipal United States Government declared "war" on each other, the more conveniently to bilk and oppress Americans "mistaken" for either "United States Citizens" [Territorial] or "Citizens of the United States" [Municipal]. 

They each have their court systems set up to defraud us whether coming or going, so long as we retain any "citizenship" related to either the British Territorial United States or the Municipal United States.  

If you are "taken for" a British "United States Citizen", they will sue you in the Municipal UNITED STATES COURTS.  

If you are taken for a Municipal "Citizen of the United States", they will sue you in the Territorial United States Courts.  

And either way, your goose will be cooked with 98% efficiency.  

Thus, there is no real relief or answer to be found in either the Territorial or the Municipal "systems", as both ends are rigged against the middle -- you. 

This is why gallant and otherwise knowledgeable men like Rod Class and Paul Anthony Williams are so often unsuccessful and so often attacked --- they are still operating within that Double Bind system when they act in the capacity of PAGs.  Specifically, they are operating as Territorial Officers, but are then still vulnerable to attack by the Municipal COURTS.  

So, you can see that the limits of the efficacy of any solution from the PAG's is set by the honor ---or lack thereof--- of specific judges and whether or not they honor the old Federal Code, and also by the ability of the PAG's themselves to avoid conflicts and subjection by the Municipal COURTS.  

And this is why Grandma says --- to Hell with it.  

We have the power and right to set up our own courts and put a definitive end to this mockery of justice and pay no attention whatsoever to what THEY are saying or doing or enforcing upon their "persons".  

How?  By taking back our own Lawful Persons and operating our own State Jural Assemblies on the land and soil of our States and using Milligan Ex Parte to force them to shut down their Territorial Courts, and then also enforce the constitutional limitations of the Municipal COURTS to shut them down.  

Bang, bang, and done, and then all we have to worry about is cluing in enough Americans (and US Citizens, too) to make this Great Correction in response to the Great Fraud.  

Sure, it will be hard work at first --- but ask yourselves --- will it be worth it not to live in fear again?  Not be fleeced out of your earnings again?  To receive back credit you are owed by these corporations?   To be free again?  

Once enough people realize that they are naturally outside of this entire purported  foreign "Justice System" and that they do not have to subject themselves to it at all,  our country will naturally return to its own Public Law and no longer be bullied and culled by Special Interest Groups and commercial corporations seeking to lord it over the rest of us. 

Once Rod Class and Paul Anthony Williams and other brilliant and motivated men start working effectively to bring their intellect to bear on building our lawful American Court System instead of fighting inside The Box provided by the foreign commercial corporations responsible for these travesties, the end of this deplorable system of oppression under color of law will be assured. 

Take heart, do your paperwork, learn the facts, and go forth and conquer!   


See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Anatomy of a Birth Certificate - What It Means

By Anna Von Reitz

Take a look at the Birth Certificate issued in your NAME.  

What's the first thing you notice?  

It's on funny paper: hard surfaced, durable, heavy paper called "bond paper".  This is your first clue that your estate has been seized upon and that bonds--- that is, promissory notes---  have been issued against your name. 

The next thing that will probably catch your eye is that there are all sorts of seals and blazons and watermarks on this piece of paper.  It carries all sorts of emblems from a "State of State" organization, depending on where and when you were born.  

We know from our study of the history that these organizations are all foreign with respect to us, as our own American State of State organizations have been moth-balled since the Civil War. 

Look at the BC issued in your name.  It will show either a Territorial State of State with its name written in Upper and Lower Case like this: State of Washington, or a Municipal STATE OF STATE written in All Capitals like this: STATE OF IOWA.  

All these seals and watermarks and other gee-gaws serve to identify the "Issuer" of the Birth Certificate, which is the foreign State of State Organization, not you.  They are identifying your NAME as property belonging to them, which they are issuing bonds against.  

The next thing you will most likely notice is that your name is spelled out in All Capital Letters, and that, most likely, other words appear in All Capital Letters.  

According to the Bar Association Manual and the Government Printing Office and Federal Bureau of Engraving and Black's Law Dictionary and the Chicago Manuel of Style, the only things that can be named using All Capital Letters are: (1) Corporations or (2) Dead men's estates.  

The All Capitals names are a form of Latin called "Dog Latin".  

So, look at your name as it appears in All Capitals on that Birth Certificate.  

Are they issuing bonds against a Dead Man's Estate?  Or against a corporation? 

If your name appears like this: JOHN ALLEN DOE, the bonds have been issued against your ESTATE on the presumption that you donated it to the State of State or STATE OF STATE Organization.  

If your name appears like this: JOHN A. DOE, the bonds have been issued against a PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY franchise on the presumption that you donated that to the State of State or STATE OF STATE Organization. 

In either case, obviously, so far as you know you didn't donate anything to any of these yahoos and you are not aware of having given them permission to bond your estate or any public transmitting utility, either.  It all sounds bizzare, doesn't it?   

But there is the evidence in your hand.  

Now, who is the Birth Certificate Bond signed by?  The Registrar.  The Registrar is an Officer of the Probate Court.  The appearance of their signature on "your" Birth Certificate is absolute proof that your property --- whether your ESTATE or your PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY --- has been probated and seized upon as property belonging to the State of State or STATE OF STATE that issued the Birth Certificate. 

Now look at the dates on the face of the Birth Certificate.  You will see your actual birthday and also a file date ---- the "birthdate".   These refer to the actual event of your birth, and then, some days or weeks later, the "filing" of the paperwork to either (1) pronounce "you" dead and create your ESTATE; or (2) to create "your" PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY.  

Either way, you arrived first and have first right of recall and ownership, known as a reversionary trust interest in your own Good Name and assets.  

After all, you are being misrepresented as the "donor" of all these assets and the State of State is claiming to be the beneficiary of your largesse.   Having discovered this "mistake" made by your Mother when you were just a baby in your cradle, you have a right to come forward and correct it upon discovery. 

What else does the Birth Certificate represent?  

It is evidence of crime against you and fraud and non-disclosure against your mother.  

It is evidence of attempting to contract with and establish "unconscionable contract" with an infant.  

An "unconscionable contract" is a contract that you literally are not aware of.  And how could a little baby be aware of a contract made "for" him when he was only a few days old, by a new Mother who was never given full disclosure about those papers she was signing at the hospital?  She couldn't explain to you what she was never given to understand herself, could she? 

The BC is potent evidence of crime.  

Now, what are you going to do with it / about it?  

The first thing you are going to do is secure two Witness Testimonies from people who have "reasonable first hand knowledge" of you and your family, who can affirm that you are "the" living man or woman whose birth occurred at such and such a time and place and to your parents, etc.  

This establishes the fact that you are the presumed "Donor" of the property referenced by the BC and also establishes your standing to sue these criminals. 

Next, if you follow our advice, you will complete the paperwork to return your Trade Name (also known as your Good Name and Given Name -- "John Allen Doe" in Upper and Lower Case) to the land and soil jurisdiction of your birth State.   

This process explicitly demonstrates--- and recording of the action proves--- that you, the presumed Donor, are acting as a Lawful Person, not a Legal Person. 

This puts you outside their jurisdiction, so they can no longer "presume" anything about you.  

Next, having secured your Trade Name and having permanently domiciled it on the land and soil jurisdiction State, you will Expatriate from any presumed political status as a Territorial Citizen (like someone born in Puerto Rico) or Municipal CITIZEN (created in the Municipality of Washington, DC, for example). 

And you will revoke all Prior Powers of Attorney and name your Lawful Person  ---John Allen Doe, in this example--- as the only Attorney-in-Fact authorized to do business for you and your estate.  

Finally, you will seize upon all the other Assumed Names and NAMES that are or could be associated with you in any regard, and all their variations and permutations and orderings and styles, and you will use a recorded Certificate of Assumed Name(s) to claim them and permanently domicile all of them on the land and soil of your State of the Union, too. 

This last is a process like re-flagging a ship.  Instead of "sailing" under the auspices of the British Territorial Government or the Municipal Government of Washington, DC, you are now demonstrably sailing under the auspices of Maine or California or whatever other actual land and soil jurisdiction State.  

This also puts your Good Name and all the "derivative" NAMES under the Pubic Law, so that you are no longer subject to the codes and statutory laws and "public policies" of the foreign State of State or STATE OF STATE Organizations.  

In sum total, at the end of this process, you have: (1) damning conclusive evidence of their wrong-doing against a baby; (2) proof of your ownership of your name and your standing; (3) proof of your political status; (4) proof that you are the only authorized Power of Attorney; (5) proof that any "vessels" related to you stand under the Public Law and are not subject to any presumption or interpretation otherwise.  

You still have to learn how to use these documents in your defense and be able to describe this whole circumstance, but taken together they form a competent rebuttal and evidence trail removing you from any "US citizenship" status, and returning you to your rightful status as an American State National. 

And again --- why is all this necessary?   Because your identity has been stolen.   The Birth Certificate you hold in your hand is irrefutable evidence of the facts. 

You were deliberately misidentified as a baby as either a "United States Citizen" [Territorial] or "Citizen of the United States" [Municipal] and unless you rebut the evidence, you will be claimed as chattel belonging as a property asset to one of these foreign commercial crime syndicates. 

For additional insight, I recommend the YouTube videos of Jordan Maxwell and any and all lectures regarding the "Justinian Deception" --- the use of Dog Latin--- by Romley Stewart.  

Time is of the essence and numbers count, as these crime syndicates know that they have been discovered and that their system has been deconstructed, so that they either make amends or are destroyed by liquidation or worse.  

Please join the effort, correct your records, [for Do It Yourself Help go to or see Article 928 on my website, or see the Help Service portal about midway down my website home page to request additional help] and then go to our new sign in service: . 

SignInAmerica  is an organizational tool to help us identify and as much as possible pre-qualify Americans who have corrected their political status to receive Credit Vouchers to offset debts of the STRAWMAN entities that have been created "in their names". 


See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The American States Assembly Reminder

By Anna Von Reitz

If you are sick of nonsense, delays, and "ops" pretending to be patriot efforts to restore your country and your lawful government.....

If you are tired of fighting off international bill collectors making false claims against your good name and estate..... 

If you are not willing to live in fear of your own employees..... 

Then it is time to DO something about it that is safe, effective, and permanent. 

Join us.  

Every Monday at 6 pm Pacific - 7 pm Mountain - 8 pm Central- 9 pm Eastern

Please click the link below to join the webinar: 

Or iPhone one-tap : US: +16699006833,,597600142# or +19292056099,,597600142# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): 

US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 929 205 6099 Webinar ID: 597 600 142 International numbers available:

Recipe for Disaster:

By Anna Von Reitz

Wash four big cucumbers.  Chop into big pieces.  Puree in the blender until the desired consistency.  Use this cucumber puree to substitute for tomato sauce in all your favorite recipes:  cucumber pizza, cucumber spaghetti sauce, and cucumber chili mac.... 

Yuck, right?  

Nobody in their right mind would substitute cucumber puree for tomato sauce.  

But there are plenty of people who think they can substitute US Citizens for Americans. 

Things don't work that way, and for the same reasons demonstrated above. 

Even though the processes --- pureeing in one case and assembling a State (or State of State) in the other --- are virtually identical, the results are profoundly different.  

When you start out with US Citizens you get a commercial corporation franchise.  When you start out with Americans you get a "live" unincorporated State of the Union. 

It's not that cucumbers are good and tomatoes are bad. Or vice versa.   

In a salad, they even work nicely together.  

But there are applications and assembling your States of the Union is one of them, where the two can't substitute for each other.  

It's as simple as that.

These yahoos who are pushing the idea that US Citizens can form States of the Union are: (1) deliberately misleading you into making a cucumber pizza, or (2) so ignorant they can't foresee the results of their own actions. 

So do you want to waste your time, your material, and quite possibly go to jail (because US Citizens have no "right to assemble") or do you want to take action that will get you where you want to go?  

These same folks are running around using fake names like "Virgo Triad" and "SunTzu" and "Merlin" because they are scared.  

Does it make sense to you that you should be afraid of your own employees?  

If not, its high time that you put all that behind you and joined with other like-minded Americans to put an end to the injustices and "upside down" governance of this country.  

It's either that, or, cucumber pizza, anyone?


See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.