Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Friday, October 28, 2022

Happy Places 2.0

 By Anna Von Reitz

Many years ago, my Sister and I learned to retreat from life's many challenges, simply by closing our eyes and going to our "Happy Place".  By the rules of our game, our Happy Place could be a favorite actual place, or a place we created in our imagination.  Either way, it had to be a place where we felt safe and at peace and.....well,...... happy. 

This little game between Sisters kept our hearts and minds free.  

Bored senseless waiting for a dental appointment?  Never mind.  It's okay.  Check out for a few moments and visit one of your Happy Places. 

Frustrated to tears?  No problem.  That special beach is waiting for you. 

Tired?  Sad?  Bury your senses and your grief in the comforts of nature.  Feel the wind or the water washing away your cares. 

Sure, it's all in your mind, but would you rather stare steadfastly at the back of an airplane seat for four hours?  

Or let somebody else, like Hollywood, pick your mental destination?

Our own dreams are always better. 

So use your capacity to imagine and visualize and put it to good use. 

My Sister's favorite Happy Place is a little wooden beach cabin, weathered and grey, with wood shingles and a front porch that has a railing, and bright colored flowers, red geraniums and pink petunias, in hanging baskets, well-worn rocking chairs, and a table with a checkerboard. Braided rugs in tones of blue and white, cream and orange. 

Over the years she has described her Happy Place until it has become one of my special places, too. 

I know where she goes when she is hurt, or frightened, or lonely.  

Whatever "real" life throws at you, you are blessed to have your Happy Places, your little bits of Heaven, to comfort you, close by as a thought. 

In your Happy Place, you can always draw a deep breath. 

So, now, I am encouraging everyone to step it up a bit, and stretch your imaginations. Add to your Happy Places.  Expand upon them.  Take a walk down the beach to the next cove.  

Think about the setting of your Happy Place.  What kind of place is it?  What kind of community would it belong to?  Imagine that community.  Would it have a bakery?   A General Store?  A ballpark? 

What kind of people live in your town?  Are they happy, healthy, and friendly?  Do they know you?  What have you been doing in this community?  Fixing cars?  Building houses?  Working at the library?  Pulling fresh loaves of bread out of the big oven at the bakery?  Selling tickets at the railway station?  Nursing the sick and the elderly?  Maybe you are a brewmaster, making a fine single malt whiskey?  Or a grocer, putting up a display of fresh blueberries in paper boxes?  

Maybe you are a writer, a fisherman, or a garlic farmer.  

It's up to you, it's your town.  It's your life. You are in control of what goes on inside your head, even if the world around you seems dangerously out of control. You have the right and the ability to create your own town, and your own world. 

Soon, you will carry this ability forward into your physical life, too, and what you create will only be limited by you. Instead of just imagining it, you will be able to build it.  And share it.  


See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Something in the Air

By Anna Von Reitz

Does everyone recall, as I do, the late Queen Elizabeth II, letting her hand fall in consternation on the arm of an overstuffed couch covered in fine Jacobin floral patterns, and declaring, "Charles shall never be my Successor." 

She said this clearly, with perfect enunciation, and no small amount of energy.  Her expression was one of calm and final determination.  There was nothing to suggest that she had the least doubt remaining, and her jaw was set with that little tell-tale fold mark at the right corner of her mouth.  Nobody who knew the Queen had any question or doubt that Charles had pimped his last gasp, ruined his last horse, and caused his last scandal as Heir Apparent. 

Mother had, over-flowingly, had enough. 

And nobody present, not members of the Royal Family,  not the Prime Minister, not the assorted members of the Privvy Council ---- nobody dared say a word, raise a question or even cock an eyebrow.  They'd all been properly and surely informed concerning what was not going to happen, and left to wonder what would happen and who else would be named as the Queen's Successor. 

There was a short flurry of speculation surrounding who might rise in the Queen's estimation and profit from Charles' political demise.  After brief casting about, it was decided that Prince William was the most likely candidate to simply brush past his Father, but not before a process akin to a Fraternity Rush had taken place and all the other possibilities had been remembered, examined, and for one reason or another discarded from the "Most Likely" spot. 

Those of us who witnessed this brief cut-and-dried drama during an unguarded moment of BBC "coverage" --- which usually means covering something up --- have remembered it.  It had the quality of one brief blinding shaft of sunlight striking through the clouds.  I would hazard a guess that it was in 2009 that this occurred, at about the same time that Michael Jackson's death was reported--- so by my estimate, anyway, more than a decade ago.  

Much has happened since then.  Charles' marriage to Camilla Parker-Bowles seemed to calm his restless and often unhappy spirit, and thing settled down, with Charles lapsing into his more solid role as a man of intellectual depth interested in architecture, city planning, water pollution remediation, animal welfare, and an endless list of similar proper concerns, well-distanced from chasing skirts and tromping around the celebrity circuit.  Once he turned sixty-five even the papers stopped chasing him around like hounds.  

There seemed to be a pause, almost like a pleasant intake of breath held comfortably, and at a time in his life when most men consider themselves retired, a few people were heard to say, with a slight bit of wonder, "Prince Charles appears to have come into his own."   

Despite the Queen's solemn pronouncement that Charles would not be her Successor, nobody seemed to question it much when Charles was heralded as King Charles the Third, but I questioned it for the simple reason that I have been watching Queen Elizabeth for most of my life.  

Via the miracle of modern telecommunication, I have heard Elizabeth II speak on hundreds of occasions, watched her reactions to sporting events, the openings of Parliament, romps in the country, tender moments with family, and every other kind of scene one might imagine. I have watched her sign death warrants condemning some hapless Territorial to the gallows with the same business-like acumen with which she performed so many other duties. 

Through this long-standing Observation, I believe that I have developed a fine sense of the Queen's indomitable, fixed character. I believed her when she said that Charles would never be her Successor all those years ago; she meant it, and I don't think she changed her mind.  I think she did something totally unexpected and brilliant. 

As the last of her days played out, I believe that she sensed the end coming and retired to Balmoral in Scotland, where she prepared for her Successor, King Charles of Scotland. 

Even Native Heirs of Britannia don't realize that under the terms of the formation of Great Britain, any one of the four (4) kings -- England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales -- can serve as the King of Great Britain in a pinch. 

This would adequately explain the otherwise completely inexplicable recent swearing-in ceremony of the members of the Parliament and Judiciary, wherein they all swore allegiance to "King Charles", not "King Charles, the Third".  

Astonished commentators, including myself, gave side-long glances and knew, absolutely, that something is afoot.  Top British Barristers could never and would never make such an omission, and neither would the seasoned members of the Queen's Government. I would sooner bet on Mount Everest falling down, than consider that swearing-in ceremony anything but deliberate and precise.  

Almost immediately people jerked awake and speculations started to fly about this very odd spectacle.  Were they all swearing allegiance to King Charles I, the second son of James VI, one of the Catholic Stuart Kings, who was beheaded in 1649?  He was one of the casualties of the still-ongoing English Civil War, which was more about religion than our American Civil War, but in the end, just as illegal and interminable. 

Our early research on the subject suggests that what we have suffered in America was also suffered first in England: an undeclared Civil War steeped in violence and mercenary intrigue, excused as a religious war just as the American Civil War was propagandized as a moral crusade against slavery when the real motivations were commercial. The real bone of contention in the English Civil War appears to have been the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church and the extensive spread of its "Common Wealth" holdings.  

Is it possible that the actual history has been unearthed and the Stuart Kings are being put forward by the Roman Catholic Church?  And faced with overwhelming evidence, the Parliament and Judiciary are standing for this?  

That's one theory, not mine. 

I think that the present King Charles of Scotland would be a logical and historically supported choice to rule Great Britain, to protect the land and soil and cultures of the British peoples, rebuild the strength of the military apart from dependence on Allies, and restore Britain's maritime industries and time-honored crafts.  He is, after all, Scottish through and through, not a German in tweeds. 

At a time when we are otherwise all left with apparent acceptance by the UK Government of spectacles like the Dead Baby Procession at the London Olympics and this more recent example of WTF? -- presided over by then (definitely) Prince Charles earlier this year:  

----King Charles of Scotland would be a relief as King of Great Britain,  as well as a true son of the British Isles. 

In the end, I think Elizabeth II had her way and it won't be long before we all know the Successor she named.  It's possible that she split her many roles and left Charles to rule "the Kingdom of the Dead" --- the Chair of the Estates, that she sat on herself for so many years. The truth will become apparent as part of the Coronation process. 

The true king will wear the Christian Crown of Saint Edward.  The false king will wear the Imperial Crown.  If past practice continues, we won't see the Coronation of the true king, which will be a private ceremony with few attendees at the Canterbury Chapel, but we will see the giant tabloid-like coronation of the false king, who will appear to take the proper Coronation vows and wear the proper crown, only to take up the Imperial Crown and go sit on the Chair of the Estates within three days of the public coronation. 

The King of Life and the King of Death are both enthroned in England, according to the ancient seasonal calendar of the Celtic peoples, and always remember that the wheel of the year turns in a way you might not expect: the King of Death is always enthroned in the summer, during the high holidays of Midsummer, while the King of LIfe is always enthroned in the winter, during the darkest, coldest times.    

Keep your eyes open and your ears perked up; something more than usually odd is going on in England. 


See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

"When We Find Error"

 By Anna Von Reitz

And now, I shall give you an example of what I have been talking about in the last three articles concerning the need of Americans to become better able to sift facts from fictions, and establish the context and meaning of what they read. 

I am using the very last section of factual evidence presented in the "Who Founded and Owns Washington, DC?" TABU article as an example of how the interpretation of factual evidence changes.  Bear in mind, I am not disputing that this is factual evidence; I am disputing what the factual evidence means --- it's interpretation.  

The original text appears in normal font, while my commentary as a Reader follows in bold-face type: 

Quote ---"The following 15 points are based upon factual historical evidence:

1st: In 1863, Lincoln instituted martial law. He ordered that the states (people) either conscribe troops and provide money in support of the North or be recognized as an enemy of the nation. This martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today – what it means is that the President has dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by the government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders.

My comment: Everything Lincoln did and said was in the context of being the "President" of a Corporation, not The President of this country.  His very first "Executive Order", General Order 100, otherwise known as The Lieber Code, went into effect the day before he declared the bankruptcy of his Territorial Crown Corporation doing business as "the United States of America, Incorporated". 

 All the acts of the Territorial Congress then in Session, including its declaration of Martial Law, can pertain only to the functions of the British Territorial United States, its officers, citizenry, and instrumentalities.  Not us.  Not the Americans they work for. 

This information (above, plain faced type) is about a foreign, British Territorial Corporation, and the actions it took to save itself and maintain order during its insolvency.  Although this corporation worked for us as a Federal Subcontractor, its fortunes and administrative "laws" and corporate Public Policies are not ours, are not about us and are not addressed to us; Mr. Lincoln was speaking to his shareholders and creditors and giving instructions to his employees in the form of his "Executive Orders" as the President of a corporation.  

At no time did he ever act as The President of The United States of America ---- our unincorporated Federation of States.  In fact, Lincoln couldn't ascend to the actual Presidential Office, nor even the Presidency of the Federal Republic, because Lincoln was a Bar Attorney, an Esquire, in receipt of that Title from the Queen, and he was prohibited as all attorneys still are, from holding any Public Office in our Government by the Titles of Nobility Amendment passed by our States of the Union in 1819. 

It is in this guise as the President of a foreign corporation Subcontractor that all subsequent "Presidents" have operated and it is only in reference to corporations that such things as "Public Policies" and "Administrative Law" and "Executive Orders" and bankruptcies apply.  Unincorporated entities, like our actual Federation of States, are not eligible for bankruptcy protection.  So we know for sure that Lincoln's "Union" wasn't ours and we know that he was not occupying our Presidential Office. 

And we know that the context of his words and acts and those of the Territorial Congress could logically only refer to their own citizenry and operations, not to ours.  

2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia.

My comment: This action, The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, was undertaken by the British Territorial Congress to establish a new corporation to function as the purveyor of "essential government services" owed to us---- and as their British Crown Corporation, "the United States of America, Inc." was still in reorganization, they structured it as a Municipal Corporation, instead. Now we have the British Territorial U.S. Government with one Crown Corporation in reorganization and one Municipal Corporation, US Corp,  just starting up.  

In no case is the "District of Columbia" our "actual" government.  The District of Columbia is a foreign British Territorial Enclave created to give it a location to conduct its business and organize the services it is under contract to provide to us, the Americans and our States of our Union.  The Municipality of Washington, DC, was similarly established to allow the Pope and his Holy Roman Empire Government to have a bit of ground where they could organize to provide such services as Postal Service. 

3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment. The national constitution’s 13th, 14th and 15th amendments are respectively numbered 14th, 15th and 16th amendments in their constitution.

My Comment:  The only Constitution that ever contained the Titles of Nobility Amendment (often called the Original 13th Amendment)  is the American Federal Constitution passed in 1787, called "The Constitution for the united States of America". This Constitution passed into disuse because the American Subcontractors that were Party to it were rendered inoperable in 1860 and the Federal Republic this Constitution referenced was never Reconstructed. 

There is no "renumbering" involved. The British Territorial Constitution of the United States of America and the Municipal Constitution of the United States never contained the Titles of Nobility Amendment in the first place.  

On top of that, the "Constitutions" being discussed here, which were being published as "Constitutions" in 1868 and in 1871--- are both Corporate Charters deceitfully called "Constitutions".  As such, they are completely different kinds of documents, existing in a different jurisdiction, serving different purposes, and being subject to different forms of law than the actual and original Constitutions which are still valid "in original jurisdiction" but largely moth-balled as part of The Great Fraud against us.   

Under this scheme, the British Territorial United States owns two corporations, one British Crown Corporation calling itself "The United States of America" [Incorporated] formed in Scotland in 1868, and one Municipal Corporation calling itself "the United States" [INCORPORATED]  formed in the District of Columbia a decade later.  These Corporations and their "Corporate Constitutions" are used to pull off a Substitution Scheme, similar to a Bait-and-Switch.   

The Perpetrators appear to be operating under the original Constitutions, but they are not. The process of amending an actual Constitution, which requires ratification by our States of the Union, is reduced to a by-law amendment process of a corporation charter.  This is why, when you look into it, you find that "Congress" operating either as the British Territorial Congress or the Municipal Congress can amend their "Constitutions" at will with no ratification by the States or People. 

The 14th so-called Amendment to the Scottish Commercial Corporation "Constitution" was never ratified by the States of the Union, and neither was the 15th, 16th, or any other such "Amendment".  All these so-called Constitutional Amendments exist as By-Law Amendments of a commercial corporation, and in this case, the Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business as "The United States of America" --- Incorporated, went bankrupt in 1906 and has been totally defunct since 1913.  

The Perpetrators and their progeny who have benefited from this Fraud and Gross Breach of Trust have continued to invoke these Corporate Constitutions and their By-Law Amendments as if they had authority over Americans, when in fact, the only authority these documents ever had was over the officers, shareholders and employees of these commercial corporations and now, all the original corporations that started this Fraud are bankrupted and defunct.  

Nonetheless, this Fraud is why the Perpetrators have been at such pains to mischaracterize and misidentify average Americans as U.S. Citizens and as Municipal citizens of the United States --- to create the legal supposition that we are subject to them and their Corporate "Constitutions" instead of them being subject to us and our Constitutions. 

4th: The corporation began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.’ assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.

My Comment: As these foreign corporations issued the bonds and created the debts under conditions of fraudulent misrepresentation and non-disclosure, the entire activity and its fruits are criminal in origin.  Our Public never owed any  bankruptcy protection to these foreign corporations, and yet, we were left to stand as the Security for their debts, and the other Principals who are Signatories to the actual Constitutions and the Treaties underlying the Constitutions, all sat mum as posts and did nothing to fulfill their Lawful and Legal obligations to this country and to the American States and People.  

These Principals, including the Popes, the British Monarchs, and the Lord Mayors of the Inner City of London, have acted in Gross Breach of Trust and Dereliction of Duty and in violation of their commercial service contracts.  They have unjustly enriched themselves while purposefully misrepresenting the entire situation to us, their clueless American Employers, and also to the rest of the world. 

To us, they pretended that everything was fine and safe and just and normal and everything related to the American Civil War had been Reconstructed and settled long ago ---- while they continued to carry on this Mercenary Conflict on our shores and pillaged and plundered our people and our natural resources while taking their paychecks and pensions from our pockets. 

To the rest of the world, they pretended that we, Americans, and our original American Government, were mysteriously "absent, presumed to be in interregnum" and using this pathetic excuse for their own dishonesty and lack of disclosure to their Employers, they began "salvage operations" in 1921, secretively and under force requiring the "registration" of American babies as Wards of their State-of-State franchise corporations, thereby reducing their Employers to Dependents and illegally, immorally, and unlawfully converting and seizing upon American land assets for their own benefit. 

5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name “Federal Reserve Bank”. Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system-again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.

My comment: This was clearly an accommodation among thieves, two corporations, both of them deceitfully named to make people think they were associated with our Federal Government, both conspiring to impersonate us and use our assets as "Securities" so that they could access our credit without disclosure, hypothecate debts "in our names",  and force us to pay unlimited interest for the "privilege" of accessing our own credit. 

Why should we ever pay them to issue our money, when we have the ability and wealth to issue our own?  Why should we agree to pay them gross amounts of interest for the use of our own credit?  Why should we "voluntarily" pay Federal Income Taxes, when we are not Federal citizens of either stripe, and we receive no "Federal Income" from these loutish criminal corporations? 

We, the Americans, never agreed to any of this. None of it was disclosed. All of it was misrepresented.  And the end result is a massive balloon of Odious Debt --- that is, debt created by means of subterfuge and fraud, of which the victims are unaware and from which they do not benefit. 

6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. passes and adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. It must be noted that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.

My Comment: As we have already seen, the 16th Amendment, like the 14th Amendment, were not part of any legitimate Constitution the American People signed, and were instead attached to Corporate Charters deliberately and deceitfully called "Constitutions" designed to closely resemble the actual Constitutions that the Perpetrators owe us. Such Corporate "Constitutions" do not require ratification by the States, because the States are not Party to them, and any such "Amendments" as the Corporation's Board of Directors and Shareholders may make, are merely By-Law Amendments completely unrelated to us.  

Thus, the Schemers could tax their own corporation's employees for the privilege of being employed --- an "income tax", as a condition of employment, and take refuge in their own corporation's By-Law Amendments, but where they went completely off the trolley was in conspiring to impersonate and misrepresent average Americans as "Federal Dependents".

They have used False, Coerced, and Undisclosed Registrations as a Pretense to latch onto and unlawfully convert the personal and political status of Americans first to that of British Territorial U.S. Citizens, and second to that of US PERSONS --- which are individual Municipal Corporation franchises considered to be Municipal citizens of the United States.  All this is grossly illegal and unlawful and clearly forbidden by our Constitutions, by their own Federal and Municipal Codes, and by both the Hague and the Geneva Conventions.  

And they have done this while receiving their paychecks and pensions from us and while being strictly under contract -- Article IV of every Constitution in every jurisdiction, ever -- to protect us and protect our persons and protect our assets.  

7th: Next (also 1913) Congress passed and entered the 17th amendment as ratified, even though the states had no opportunity to ratify the same. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected.

My Comment: We have already discussed how they worked a Substitution Scheme to substitute their Corporate Charters misrepresented as Corporate  "Constitutions" closely resembling the actual Constitutions already in effect, and also how they evaded the requirement of ratification by the States and unlawfully converted the Constitutional Amendment Process to a Corporate By-Law Amendment process. Nothing that they have done within the realm of their corporations should be allowed to impact us, but instead, they have openly conspired to latch onto and misrepresent Americans as Employees and/or Dependents of their foreign corporations. 
They have absolutely no contract nor any excuse for what they have done to their honorable and steadfast Employers --- as they have sought to deceive us and disinherit us and defraud us, while receiving payment to protect us, our persons. and our assets. 

8th: In 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for re-election in 1913 by popular vote are seated in Corp. U.S. capacity only.

My Comment: This is true and disgraceful, and it has continued unabated to the present day. The really peculiar thing, though, is that only some members of the Territorial  "Congress" know that they are operating in this capacity, and only this capacity, while others assume that they are operating properly and apparently never catch on otherwise. This indicates an ongoing conspiracy within the Congress itself to further control and hide what they are doing, even from members of the same body. 

9th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters WWI and passes their Emergency War Powers, and Trading with the Enemies Acts.

My Comment: None of what the Territorial United States Congress did in 1917 applies to us, though people often mistake what is going on and who is doing it and in what capacity, including even some members of the Territorial Congress and employees of theirs at the DOJ --- the misnamed "Department of Justice" which is really an in-house corporate legal firm hired to defend the phony corporation and its officers from complaints, all paid for by us, of course. 

The actual Constitutions don't provide for any "Emergency Powers" and the American People who signed the Constitutions as Principals would laugh at the entire idea. The only "Powers" our Constitutions grant are strictly enumerated, no more, no less.  

Americans by definition cannot be "Enemies" and "Employers" at the same time, so, yes, we had to be excluded and exempt from the Trading With the Enemy Act and were never the intended targets.  The exemption is found in Section 25 of the Appendix if you can understand sneaky lawyer-speak well enough, and the "Enemies" discussed are "domestic" with respect to what?  The District of Columbia.  So what the Trading With the Enemy Act is actually about is trading with the Municipal citizenry and any other foreign nationals that the British Crown Corporation is having a Mercenary Conflict with at the time. 

10th: In 1918, President Wilson is re-elected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where in the new Corp. U.S., only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation. The only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government’s seats were vacated because the people didn’t seat any original jurisdiction government officers.

My Comment: Right here, above, is an example of where forgetting who we are and who they are can be a real detriment, as it leads to logical but wrong conclusions. 

The Electoral College elected President Wilson to a Second Term as President of both the USA, Inc. and the US, INC., but the corporation officers pretending to be "United States Senators" --- which "United States" was that?  Wink-Wink.... disagreed. The "Senators" representing the USA, Inc. had had enough of Wilson as "their" British Territorial "President" and refused to confirm.  

We have a similar situation going on right here, right now, where the popular vote and the Electoral College both confirmed Donald Trump for a second term as both President of the USA, Inc. and the President of the US, INC., but the "SENATORS" the Municipal "US, INC." had had enough of Trump and refused to confirm, even without a whole bunch of foreign intrigue to hack the election. 

What happens is that we have two (2) "Presidents" both acting as "President" of a foreign commercial corporation.  Trump has been kept on as the "President" of the USA, Inc. version --- whatever they are calling their corporation now, and Biden has been elected as the "President" of the US, INC., or what they are now calling the "White House Office, INC." 

The contract of collusion both corporations agreed to and published back in 1937, The Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The United States, is falling apart. 

Nobody knows what is really going on, and mass confusion reigns as these behemoths try to hide their assets and shuffle off their obligations and get set up for another round of fraud, all while pointing fingers and blaming each other for their joint gross disregard for their actual Employers --- the American States and People. 

11th: In 1933, the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States of America as enemies of Corp. U.S.

My Comment: This "adjustment" isn't really any adjustment of the Territorial Corporation's Trading With the Enemy Act issued in 1917, rather, it's the Municipal Corporation's reply sixteen years later.  

In the first round, the Territorial Corporation identified their favorite whipping boys, the Federal Civil Service and Municipal Corporations and all "citizens of the United States", as their domestic Enemies.  Sixteen years later the Municipal Corporation identified the U.S. Citizens acting as the citizenry of "the" United States of America as the "Enemy". 

The actual Americans still have to be explicitly excluded from the "Enemy" list, because we are the actual Employers of the Municipal citizens, too, and we remain "non-domestic" --- permanently domiciled outside both the District of Columbia and the Municipality of Washington, DC.  

The problem, of course, is that both Corporations and their actual "citizens" conspire to claim and misidentify Americans as either Territorial or Municipal citizens, or both.  We get "caught in the cross-fire" so to speak and it doesn't help that most of us are confused about who "they" are and about who "we" are. 

12th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.

My Comment: Those of you old enough to remember World War II or the years immediately following will remember seeing "US CORP" plastered on virtually every surplus canteen, Jeep, fork, and olive green tent. This is the US CORP that was deliberately used as the scapegoat and made the "Debtor" and made to pay "War Reparations" as the Winner in the War. 

I know. Makes as much sense as mud on a skewer, but the Pope and the Boyz in Rome had a big Brain Fart and decided that no matter who starts a war, from now on, whoever wins the war has to pay for it.  So, better pray you lose, or be determined not to let a war ever get started, and if it does start, avoid getting involved. 

This was what inspired the Peter Seller's movie, The Mouse That Roared.  All you had to do was lose a war to the United States and like Secretary of Defense McNamara, fail your way to success. 

Certain parties are currently remembering this little agreement and how it was used to justify soaking us after WWII.  It is discouraging further opportunistic "investments" by European states and the Biden Administration in the War in Ukraine.  They are suddenly all thinking, "What if Russia loses?  What if we are found with our hands in the pot on the winning side?  We will have to pay for all the damage!" 

For once, it appears that the Vatican's intrigues are serving to put a lid on war-mongering, but I think they were prompted by more practical considerations --- the losers in a war are less likely to be able to pay debts. 

So they sacrificed the US CORP and gave it to the IMF, but remember --- this country hasn't had a Treasury since 1924, when the IMF took over that job. They were really just transferring the loot from one pocket to another, and using a European distribution channel because, well, all the damage was in Europe.  

13th: Sometime after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program. They create an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and a depository account number in the Social Security General Trust Fund (GTF). They give you the Social Security card which identifies you as the single person with authority to control the entity they created (on review: you may notice that the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, the GTF is its beneficiary and you were made its Trustee.) More importantly: this capacity does not limit you or your capacity to act in your sovereign capacity in any way.

My Comment: Beware of anything that requires you to "enroll" or "make an application" for "benefits" of any kind.  The soldiers in the Civil War were unwittingly enrolled as Mercenaries and an application makes it appear that you volunteered and sought and wanted whatever it is you are applying for. 

I know for sure that I and my comrades in High School were lied to and told that we "had to" have a Social Security Number to have a job.  We were also told that we "had to" pay Federal Income Taxes.  The Liars didn't mention that this was only true if you were applying for a Federal job --- and of course, none of us were. 

The "depository" account number is the only number you are likely to see; its called a Cusip Number because it is attached to a clearinghouse certificate which attaches your name to a Municipal citizen of the United States --- and that US individual franchise corporation, now called a "UCC Contract Trust" is liable not only for collecting deposits to pay for your retirement "benefits" but makes sure you pay for everything else, too.  

There is no longer any Social Security General Trust Fund. That was long ago merged with the Public Charitable Trust, turned into a Ponzi Scheme, and spent.  And there was never, as some people supposed, any specific trust account set up for you, there was only a money in and money out accounting function attached to these two differently formatted numbers. 

While it is perfectly true that from the Municipal Government's side of things, having this account in no way impairs your political status and is not meant to impersonate you as a Municipal citizen of the United States---- but, you now have such a PERSON attached to you, with your house as its last known address, and that PERSON is a Universal Debtor, a felon, and a slave,  in the eyes of the British Territorial Government. 

It has been that way ever since the end of the American Civil War and the adoption of the Fourteenth By-Law Amendment to a certain Corporate Constitution belonging to a Scottish Commercial Corporation passing itself off as The United States of America ---- Incorporated. 

Merely having a Municipal PERSON named after you makes you a suspect and a criminal so far as the Territorial Government is concerned, and they will spare no expense to bring that PERSON to justice and wring every penny out of it.  

Put nicely, when you were pushed to apply for a Social Security Number, you were unknowingly painting a target on your back.
The Pope liked that because there were more PERSONS to spread the debt around to, and the British Monarch and the Lord Mayor liked that, because they had more targets to harass and charge and impound and confiscate assets from. 

This was at the heart of the whole Substitution Scheme -- with the Municipal Government looking for chumps to pay their debts, and the Territorial Government let loose to collect from Americans who didn't know what was going on or why they were having their assets confiscated to pay foreign taxes, both the US, INC. and the USA, Inc., were sitting pretty on the backs of their Employers  

It was all fraud.  It was all criminal.  It still is. There is no "trust fund".  There is no "social insurance" or pension policy. And the Social Security Administration like the Internal Revenue Service has nothing whatsoever to do with our American Government. 

The Number One, Most Ludicrous, Most Obscene, Most Preposterous, and Most Destructive Lie Nomination goes to the so-called Fourteenth Amendment, and the idea that a By-Law Amendment adopted by a long defunct and criminally deceitful Scottish Commercial Corporation is still owed enforcement by anything or anyone. 

As recently as two years ago, I heard President Trump telling reporters to go look up the Fourteenth Amendment, and it was clear that he was either taking this bunko seriously himself, or he wanted other people to take it seriously.  

Here for the record books is the God's Honest Solemn Truth:

There is no authority vested in the Fourteenth Amendment, nor is there any valid Corporate "Constitution" and none of this has anything whatsoever to do with me or any living American. If possible, it has even less to do with our lawful Government. 

14th: In 1968, at the national governors’ conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would likely kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people.

My Comment: Forget using a private military script issued by foreign banks as currency displacing and using our actual gold and silver and land and labor as the assets backing the script, and then forcing us to pay usury to use credit that belongs to us. That's all bad enough, but there's worse. 

Mischaracterizing our marriages as business Joint Ventures, and claiming an ownership interest in our children as "products" of our "Joint Ventures" --- that's worse.  

Sending thugs into our hospitals to bully new Mothers into signing undisclosed paperwork giving up their babies and their babies' estates and inheritances for the benefit of foreign State-of-State franchise corporations --- that's worse. 

Using these and other means of coercion, fraud,  and illegal conscription to enslave, indebt, bully, demean, and defraud people who have saved your butts through two World Wars -- that's worse. 

Collecting taxes long after taxes are no longer needed, and using those taxes to pay non-existent interest on non-existent National Debts --- that's worse. 

All the funny money crap is bad enough, but these are crimes of state, carried out by for-profit commercial corporations masquerading as legitimate governments preying upon the people they are supposed to serve and protect. 

15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.

My Comment: Although it may be hard to imagine, the seats of our actual American Government have been "vacated", "mysteriously absent", presumed to be "in interregnum" since 1860 when all this fraud and predation began.  It started when Queen Victoria and Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha married in 1840. 

Prince Albert "seized upon" the Queen's body, which included all her Earthly (physical) wealth, and promptly carried off the management of it to Germany, where his collaborators in the House of Wettin planned the destruction of the Kingdom of Prussia, which had overtaken their Hanoverian dynasty and ancestral lands.  

They also plotted the conquest of India by the British Raj.  And they used "enfranchisement" of the British Working Class---in the sense of a Dairy Queen franchise ---  as an excuse to latch onto their Good Names, and unlawfully converted them into chattel estates, to use as collateral, converted their political status as Freemen into the status of Indentured Servants, and all their material wealth-- bodies, houses, businesses, livestock, and land, everything down to their toenails was seized upon to finance all this war-mongering and grudge-matching.  

I hate to break it, considering that I am of German stock myself, but yes, Germans engineered all this and only pretended to be British.  And it wasn't just the Nazis financed by Rome and their "British" allies, the infiltration and fraud and the disease of Corporatism began in 1840, a full hundred years before the invasion of Czechloslovakia and Poland. 

If you read the actual Constitutions you will see that forming Confederate States (that is, States-of-States) and forming Confederations is forbidden to the States of the Union.  So where did these business organizations --- and the Mercenary Conflicts they have spawned --- get a foot in the door?  

In the very beginning, in 1776, the former Colonies -- British, French, Papist --- all unanimously declared their independence from former associations and foreign rule. That fateful July the original Union of former estates thus formed called itself, the States of America. 

In September that year, the pro-American side of the original United States of America Trading Company started operations as a Federation of States, functioning as a Holding Company,  and doing business as The United States of America  --- unincorporated.  

Five years later, in 1781, the original Confederation formed under The Articles of Confederation.  The members of this Confederation were all American businesses organized as States-of-States, also known as Confederate States. 

Basically a decade after the initial fight started, the new Constitutions implemented the details of the Peace Treaties ending The War of Independence.   

If our States were prohibited from forming Confederate States, where did all these States-of-States and the entire idea of a paid, for-hire business bureaucracy come from?  The original Union, the States of America. 

We know this because the American Federal Subcontractor, known as the Federal Republic, received its new Constitution in 1787 as "the united States of America".  

Even then, big business had its nose in the tent, pushing inexorably for its own self-interest. This is what created the horrible debacle and Mercenary Conflict known as The American Civil War.  It wasn't about slavery, it was about the economic advantage and market edge that slavery gave the Southern Plantations in the cotton market over Egyptian Cotton Investments made by the British Parliament. 

Tories entrenched in the business affairs of the Northern States pushed for abolition of slavery --- not as a moral imperative, but as an economic imperative to save British cotton investments in other countries and make British textile mills more profitable. Thus it was that some influential business and professional organizations in the Northern States held their attachment to Great Britain more dear than their attachment and duty to their Southern States brethren. 

All the Confederate States, both North and South, were divided by a common enemy wearing sheep's clothing and a beggar's cloak. It remains to be seen if we will fall for the same song and dance again. 

Final words from the other authors: 

"Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us with any evidence you find that proves or disproves these facts.

When you find there is no error, then remember these simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth.

The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations, remember that is what they are and stop calling them government." 

My Final Comments: I have undertaken this exhaustive commentary not because the earlier authors were wrong, in the main, about their facts.  Rather, I have undertaken it because their interpretation of the facts is so often wrong.  Mostly they are wrong because they get confused about the similarly-named entities involved and make wrong assumptions as a result. 

Still to my lasting admiration, they managed to carry on to the overall primary insight and deliver their message to us, the later generations:  "When you speak about these private foreign corporations, remember that is what they are and stop calling them government." 

And to that I can only lend my most hearty agreement, and my deep gratitude, to all those who kept the watchfires burning. 


See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

A Precious Learning Module

 By Anna Von Reitz

The last couple days I have focused your attention on two worthy, but in some ways, dangerously misleading articles from other sources.  The first is a very intelligent discussion from Family Guardian, otherwise known as FamGuard: 

The second is from the TABU Blogspot (Toward A Better Understanding) and one of their blog articles entitled, "Who Founded and Owns Washington, DC?" 

Both of these two otherwise entirely respectable pieces of scholarship contain very valuable information and fine reasoning, but they are marred by a common error that renders much of our Patriot Literature incorrect and unreliable.  

I discussed the fundamental reasons for this flaw in both articles: we don't know the code used to write Federal Code, we weren't taught our own history, and last, but not least, we confuse "the United States of America" (Incorporated) with The United States of America (unincorporated) and we confuse "the United States" (INCORPORATED) with The United States (unincorporated).

It helps to know that, except for the very early years prior to the adoption of the Constitutions, these look-alike entities calling themselves "the United States of America" and "the United States" are certainly the names of foreign businesses, and don't refer to us or any business we own, at all. 

Yes, you read that correctly.  If you see a reference to "the United States of America" written after 1789, it refers -- with certainty --  to our British Territorial Subcontractors, not to us.  If you see the words "the United States" written after 1790, it refers to the Municipal United States Government, not to us  

These very similarly named foreign business entities were entrusted under contract (the Constitutions are service contracts) to provide us with certain enumerated services and we granted them specific "delegated powers" to enable them to provide those services.  

Every school boy in the country knows that, and yet, an astonishing number of Americans can't distinguish the fact that there is a difference between the Proper Name of our country doing business as a Nation, The United States, and the Improper Name of our Municipal Subcontractor, "the" United States. 

In the same way, people mistake our British Territorial Subcontractor, doing business as "the" United States of America, for the Proper Name of our country in international jurisdiction: The United States of America.  

And this leads to all sorts of confusion and wrong assumptions and ignorance. 

Go back and read both of the articles cited above with the firm understanding that "the United States of America" isn't us and that "the United States" isn't us, but instead these names refer to our British Territorial and Municipal Subcontractors, respectively --- and both of them are operating as commercial corporations in the business of providing us with "essential government services" --- and all while fighting with each other in an interminable Mercenary Conflict on our shores. 

Know that, because that is what these entities really are, and this is what is actually going on. Over the past decade, both these foreign corporations, the US, INC., and the USA, Inc., have gone bankrupt.  

That doesn't mean our country is bankrupt or that we are bankrupt.  It means that two foreign commercial corporations doing business "in our names" are bankrupt.  

This causes confusions, but doesn't change the facts. 

The bankruptcies of these foreign Federal Subcontractors and their relations with the British Monarch and the Pope are their business and have nothing to do with us,  especially not now, when our American Government has been called back into Session and our States are seen to be populated and functioning in General Assembly.  

Our ancestors went so far as to make a distinction between "those" United States and "these" United States, and between "thuh" United States of America --- meaning our British Territorial Employees --- and "thee" United States of America, meaning our American Government. 

Once you have this firmly in mind and are no longer fooled into assuming that we, Americans,  are the subject of the conversation, or are the natural Subjects of any Territorial or Municipal Congress, everything falls into place. 

We no longer imagine that we are the "Enemies" being referenced the Trading With the Enemy Act, for example, and we look until we find our explicit exemption buried in the Appendix of that Act.  

We understand why Mr. Obama referred to "the fifty-seven states of "our" Union" --- because he was referring to the British Territorial United States, not America --- and the British Territorial United States includes the "Seven Insular States" ---- Puerto Rico and Guam and other "United States Possessions". 

We also understand why the Brit-affiliated Territorial U.S. is always prattling on about "our democracy" and never about "our" republican states of the Union" --- It's because they are talking about a different "union" and different "states" and a different system of government entirely.  We aren't them and they aren't us, even though they continue to live here as "residents" among us. 

We know why Rod Class couldn't bring a deer rifle into the foreign capitol of Washington, DC, and why the January 6th Protestors have been so cruelly abused and misrepresented.   

We understand that the "District Government" that stands between us and the "Municipal District Government" is run as a British Territorial Government "at war" with the Pope's Municipal Government --- even though, the Pope ultimately owns both corporations.  

And we have the blessed comfort that none of this, absolutely none of this endless quagmire of deceit and war and  fraud, has anything to do with us--- except that we have often been the victims of it, and we have been treated as "collateral damage" --- literally, by our own Employees.  

Now that we know who is who, and we know what is what, we are prepared to stand up for ourselves and draw the line on our Employees and their presumptions about us, including their presumption that our American Government is "in interregnum".  

When more of the worthy Patriots in this country study a little harder and expand the scope of their inquiries they will inevitably come to the same conclusions we have, and in that day, they will stand with us, as Employers, ready, willing, and able to deal with any wrong-doing or rebellion foisted off on us by our Employees, who have been evading their constitutional obligations and abusing our delegated Powers. 

Anyone born or naturalized  in this country needs to go to: 

This is your country.  Own it today


See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.