Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Friday, October 28, 2022

A Precious Learning Module

 By Anna Von Reitz

The last couple days I have focused your attention on two worthy, but in some ways, dangerously misleading articles from other sources.  The first is a very intelligent discussion from Family Guardian, otherwise known as FamGuard: 

The second is from the TABU Blogspot (Toward A Better Understanding) and one of their blog articles entitled, "Who Founded and Owns Washington, DC?" 

Both of these two otherwise entirely respectable pieces of scholarship contain very valuable information and fine reasoning, but they are marred by a common error that renders much of our Patriot Literature incorrect and unreliable.  

I discussed the fundamental reasons for this flaw in both articles: we don't know the code used to write Federal Code, we weren't taught our own history, and last, but not least, we confuse "the United States of America" (Incorporated) with The United States of America (unincorporated) and we confuse "the United States" (INCORPORATED) with The United States (unincorporated).

It helps to know that, except for the very early years prior to the adoption of the Constitutions, these look-alike entities calling themselves "the United States of America" and "the United States" are certainly the names of foreign businesses, and don't refer to us or any business we own, at all. 

Yes, you read that correctly.  If you see a reference to "the United States of America" written after 1789, it refers -- with certainty --  to our British Territorial Subcontractors, not to us.  If you see the words "the United States" written after 1790, it refers to the Municipal United States Government, not to us  

These very similarly named foreign business entities were entrusted under contract (the Constitutions are service contracts) to provide us with certain enumerated services and we granted them specific "delegated powers" to enable them to provide those services.  

Every school boy in the country knows that, and yet, an astonishing number of Americans can't distinguish the fact that there is a difference between the Proper Name of our country doing business as a Nation, The United States, and the Improper Name of our Municipal Subcontractor, "the" United States. 

In the same way, people mistake our British Territorial Subcontractor, doing business as "the" United States of America, for the Proper Name of our country in international jurisdiction: The United States of America.  

And this leads to all sorts of confusion and wrong assumptions and ignorance. 

Go back and read both of the articles cited above with the firm understanding that "the United States of America" isn't us and that "the United States" isn't us, but instead these names refer to our British Territorial and Municipal Subcontractors, respectively --- and both of them are operating as commercial corporations in the business of providing us with "essential government services" --- and all while fighting with each other in an interminable Mercenary Conflict on our shores. 

Know that, because that is what these entities really are, and this is what is actually going on. Over the past decade, both these foreign corporations, the US, INC., and the USA, Inc., have gone bankrupt.  

That doesn't mean our country is bankrupt or that we are bankrupt.  It means that two foreign commercial corporations doing business "in our names" are bankrupt.  

This causes confusions, but doesn't change the facts. 

The bankruptcies of these foreign Federal Subcontractors and their relations with the British Monarch and the Pope are their business and have nothing to do with us,  especially not now, when our American Government has been called back into Session and our States are seen to be populated and functioning in General Assembly.  

Our ancestors went so far as to make a distinction between "those" United States and "these" United States, and between "thuh" United States of America --- meaning our British Territorial Employees --- and "thee" United States of America, meaning our American Government. 

Once you have this firmly in mind and are no longer fooled into assuming that we, Americans,  are the subject of the conversation, or are the natural Subjects of any Territorial or Municipal Congress, everything falls into place. 

We no longer imagine that we are the "Enemies" being referenced the Trading With the Enemy Act, for example, and we look until we find our explicit exemption buried in the Appendix of that Act.  

We understand why Mr. Obama referred to "the fifty-seven states of "our" Union" --- because he was referring to the British Territorial United States, not America --- and the British Territorial United States includes the "Seven Insular States" ---- Puerto Rico and Guam and other "United States Possessions". 

We also understand why the Brit-affiliated Territorial U.S. is always prattling on about "our democracy" and never about "our" republican states of the Union" --- It's because they are talking about a different "union" and different "states" and a different system of government entirely.  We aren't them and they aren't us, even though they continue to live here as "residents" among us. 

We know why Rod Class couldn't bring a deer rifle into the foreign capitol of Washington, DC, and why the January 6th Protestors have been so cruelly abused and misrepresented.   

We understand that the "District Government" that stands between us and the "Municipal District Government" is run as a British Territorial Government "at war" with the Pope's Municipal Government --- even though, the Pope ultimately owns both corporations.  

And we have the blessed comfort that none of this, absolutely none of this endless quagmire of deceit and war and  fraud, has anything to do with us--- except that we have often been the victims of it, and we have been treated as "collateral damage" --- literally, by our own Employees.  

Now that we know who is who, and we know what is what, we are prepared to stand up for ourselves and draw the line on our Employees and their presumptions about us, including their presumption that our American Government is "in interregnum".  

When more of the worthy Patriots in this country study a little harder and expand the scope of their inquiries they will inevitably come to the same conclusions we have, and in that day, they will stand with us, as Employers, ready, willing, and able to deal with any wrong-doing or rebellion foisted off on us by our Employees, who have been evading their constitutional obligations and abusing our delegated Powers. 

Anyone born or naturalized  in this country needs to go to: 

This is your country.  Own it today


See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.


  1. The Correct URL Appears to be However the URL will redirect to the aforementioned.

  2. It would be remiss of me to not thank Anna for the remarkable insights and education in this article and especially the analysis of the Famguard and TABU articles. Surely there are few amongst us that have the insight and discernment to see for ourselves that which Anna has gifted to us. This is worth a university course all in itself. Thank you Anna for the enlightenment and patient recording for posterity.

    1. We are not employers for tyrants controlling your narrative Ms Ritz Cracker jack. You go employ your fanny anywhere you wish but we the real people will never join you or your employer and the curtain they hide behind because We are Electors , We are real Kings and Priests of the most high and by your own acts of admission and dirty allegiance to The fallen frauds you have become our footstool. Sorry there is just no easy way to rebuke you and your entrapment by demonic forces disguised as the way.

  3. SUCH LIES and Hypocrisy here, whats the real point? Why so much time and energy in publishing such trash? Why carry on with such useless disingenuous treasonous acts.? The Queen oh the Queen was only impersonating a queen because everybody believed she was, same as Anna and James who are Natcisicst wanting to gain a false legacy as heads of something even if its disingenuous and illusion only hypnotizing those dumb enough to believe it and fund it Amd stand in as surety for it. What filth calling themselves Queen and Judge by their own filthy word and appointment only and not be deed , and certainly not by being a doer of Gods way.
    These frauds are lower than shit that they conger up, very poor actors. I recall Anna in one of her acts and written filth proclaim the Queen of england a fake and said there is no queen , now she's followed herr her whole life Amd defends her character and fake crown. I DONT BELIEVE THERE COULD BE A MORE IGNORANT disingenuous , psychopathic, narcissistic, LOST SOUL SEARED CONSCIENCE OF ANY WOMAN ( claims that is) ON patriot scene than this Anna , who need to repent if she ever wishes to see and know the light of truth and the way of the one and only true GOD.

    1. Whoa there. You all sound like bots with less than AI. Instead of being such jerks, "poisonous to yourself you are", how about you present your alternate information in a way that educates, maybe corrects, maybe not. Its easy to trash someone's hard work but not easy to add to the conversation productively, with knowledge based on provable facts. Try educating someone instead of just jerking off.

  4. I'm at a loss to understand much of this. But what I do understand, Anna, is that you need to change your last sentence. The 14th Amendment, on which it is based, reads, for good reason, "All persons born or naturalized in (this country), and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," etc. etc. Not understanding the importance of this qualifying phrase is what is behind the whole erroneous 'anchor baby' business that we have been subjected to for long enough. Citizenship of this country is thus not conferred on babies born to illegal aliens, tourists, or couples here on foreign diplomatic service, etc. - they are "subject to the jurisdiction" of their parents's home countries. This whole subject, of the Constitution(s), is complicated enough, without adding this oversight to the mix.