Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Saturday, February 26, 2022

Quinquagesima Sunday

 Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's

The Church's Year

The Introit of this day's Mass is the sigh of an afflicted soul confiding in God:

INTROIT Be thou unto me a God, a protector, and a place of refuge, to save me: for thou art my strength and my refuge: and for thy name's sake thou wilt be my leader, and wilt nourish me. (Fs. XXX. 3. 4.) In thee , O Lord, I have hoped, let me never be confounded: deliver me in thy justice, and set me free. (Ps. XXX. 2.)

COLLECT O Lord, we beseech Thee, graciously hear our prayers, and unloosing the bonds of our sins, guard us from all adversity. Through our Lord, etc.

EPISTLE (I. Cor. XIII. 1-13.) Brethren, if I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal. And if I should have prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I should have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. And if I should distribute all my goods to feed the poor, and if I should deliver my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing. Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not; dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; is not ambitious; seeketh not her own; is not provoked to anger; thinketh no evil; rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. Charity never falleth away: whether prophecies shall be made void, or tongues shall cease, or knowledge shall be destroyed. For we know in part, and we prophesy in part: but when that which is perfect is come, that which is in part shall be done away. When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away the things of a child. We see now through a glass in a dark manner; but then face to face. Now I know in part; but then I shall know even as I am known. And now there remain faith, hope, charity, these three: but the greatest of these is charity.

EXPLANATION In this epistle St. Paul speaks of the necessity, the excellence and the nature of true charity. He says that all natural and supernatural gifts, all good works, even martyrdom, cannot save us if we have not charity; because love alone can render our works pleasing to God. Without charity, therefore, though ever so many prayers be recited, fasts observed , and good deeds performed, nothing will be acceptable to God, or merit eternal life. Strive then, O Christian soul, to lead a pious life in love, and to remain always in the state of grace.

Can faith alone, as the so-called Reformers assert, render man just and save him?

Faith alone, however strong, though it could move mountains, without love, that is, without good works performed for love of God and our neighbor, can never justify or save us. For, when St. Paul says, that man is justified by faith without works, (Rom. III. 28.; XI: 6.; Eph. II. 8. 9.) he means to refer to those works which were performed by command of the law of Moses, and which, as they were external and without true charity, were of no avail; he did not refer to those works which are performed in a state of grace with a lively, love-inspired faith. Therefore the same Apostle writes to the Galatians: (Gal. V. 6.) Faith only availeth which worketh by charity; to Titus: (Tit. III. 8.) It is a faithful saying: and these things I will have thee affirm constantly: that they who believe in God, may be careful to excel in good works. These things are good and profitable unto men; and he exhorts the Colossians (Colos. I. 10.) to be fruitful in every good work. St. James confirms the same by saying: (James II. 17-24.) So faith if it have not works, is dead in itself; by works man is justified and not by faith only. That this is the true doctrine of Christ is evident from His own words, when He says: "Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down and shall be cast into the fire." (Matt. VII. 19.) At the day of judgment Christ will demand good works from all men, (Matt. XXV. 35.) and will not judge them only according to their faith, but by their good works, which true faith must always produce. (Apoc. XX. 12.) Would Christ and His apostles demand good works, if faith alone be sufficient? "The devil's also believe and tremble," (James II. 19.) they believe, but they are not saved, and their faith but increases their torments. Therefore, the assertion that faith without good works is sufficient for justification and salvation, is plainly against the doctrine of Christ and His Church, and must of necessity lead man to vice and misery, as shown by the history of the unhappy separation of the sixteenth century

Are good works available which are performed in the state of mortal sin ?

Good works performed while in a state of mortal sin avail nothing in regard to eternal life, writes St. Lawrence Justinian, but aid in moderating the punishment imposed for disobedience and the transgression of God's commandments. They bring temporal goods, such as honor, long life, health, earthly happiness, etc.; they prevent us from falling deeper into sin, and prepare the heart for the reception of grace; so the pious Person writes: "Do as much good as you can, even though in the state of mortal sin, that God may give light to your heart."

ASPIRATION O God of love, pour the spirit of true charity into my heart that, according to the spirit of St. Paul, I may endeavor to be always in a state of grace; that all my works may be pleasing to Thee, and meritorious for me.

GOSPEL (Luke XVIII. 31-43.) At that time, Jesus took unto him the twelve, and said to them Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things shall be accomplished which were written by the prophets concerning the Son of Man. For he shall be delivered to the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and scourged, and spit upon; and after they have scourged him, they will put him to death; and the third day he shall rise again. And they understood none of these things, and this word was hid from them, and they understood not the things that were said. Now it came to pass, when he drew nigh to Jericho, that a certain blind man sat by the way-side, begging. And when he heard the multitude passing by, he asked what this meant. And they told him that Jesus of Nazareth was passing by. And he cried out, saying: Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me. And they that went before rebuked him, that he should hold his peace. But he cried out much more: Son of David, have mercy on me. And Jesus standing, commanded him to be brought unto him. And when he was come near, he asked him, saying: What wilt thou that I do to thee? But he said: Lord, that I may see. And Jesus said to him: Receive thy sight; thy faith hath made thee whole. And immediately he saw, and followed him, glorifying God: and all the people, when they saw it, gave praise to God.

Why did Christ so often foretell His passion to His disciples?

Because He wanted to show how great was His desire to suffer for us, for we speak often of that which we crave; and because He wished His disciples when they should see Him treated as a criminal and martyred, not to think evil of Him, or imagine themselves deceived, but remember that He had foretold all minutely that all happened of His own will.

Did not the disciples  understand anything of what He predicted in regard to His future sufferings?

They may, certainly, have well understood He was to suffer, for which reason Peter tried to dissuade Him from it; (Matt. XVI. 22.) but they did not comprehend why or for what He would suffer, or how He would rise again. All this the Holy Ghost gave them to understand, after it had come to pass. (John XIV. 26.) The light of the Holy Ghost is of so much value, that without it even the clearest doctrines of faith are not understood.

Why does Christ so often call Himself the Son of Man?

He wished to show, in the Jewish way of speaking, He was also man, a descendant of Adam, and that we should be humble, and not seek or desire high titles.

Why did the blind man call Christ the Son of David?

Because, like all the Jews, he believed that the Messiah, according to humanity, would be of the house of David, as was promised. (Ps. CXXXI. 11.)

Why did Christ ask the blind man: What wilt thou that I do to thee?

This He asked, not because He was unaware of the blind man's wish, but to enable him the better to prove his faith and hope that through Christ he would receive his sight; and to teach us how willing He is to help us, and how it pleases Him if we confidingly place our wants before Him. We should learn from this blind man, who would not be restrained by the passing crowd in his ardent and reiterated request, not to pay attention, in the work we have commenced, to human respect, or human judgment, but to persevere, and not allow ourselves to be led astray by the world's mockery or contempt. We should also learn to be grateful to God, and faithfully cling to Him, if He has once opened the eyes of our mind, and healed our spiritual blindness, which is far more deplorable than physical blindness, for nothing can be more miserable than not to see and understand God, not to know what is necessary for our salvation, and what is pernicious.

Why is this gospel read on this Sunday?

The Church wishes to remind us of the painful passion and death of Jesus, and to move us by the contemplation of those mysteries to avoid and despise the wicked, heathenish amusements of carnival, sinful pleasures which she has always condemned, because they come from dark paganism, and, to avert the people from them, commands that during the three days of carnival the Blessed Sacrament shall be exposed for public adoration, sermons given, and the faithful exhorted to have recourse at this time to the Sacraments of Penance and the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar, with the reception of which Pope Clement XIII. (Breve, 23. June 1765) connected a plenary indulgence. A true Catholic will conform to the desire of his holy Church, considering the words which St. Augustine spoke, at this time, to the faithful, "The heathens (as also the wordly people of our days) shout songs of love and merriment, but you should delight in the preaching of the word of God; they rush to the dramatic plays, but you should hasten to Church; they are intoxicated, but you should fast and be sober."

PRAYER O most benign Jesus! who didst so desire to suffer for us, grant, that we may willingly suffer for love of Thee; that we may hate and flee from the detestable pleasures of the world and the flesh, and practice penance and mortification, that by so doing we may merit to be released from our spiritual blindness to love Thee more and more ardently, and finally possess Thee forever.

INSTRUCTION ON LENT

Who instituted Lent?

According to the fathers of the Church, Justin and Irenaeus, the fast before Easter was instituted and sanctified by Christ Himself; according to the saints Leo and Jerome, the holy apostles ordained it given by Jesus.

Why has the Church instituted this fast forty days before Easter?

To imitate Christ who fasted forty days; to participate in His merits and sufferings; to subject our flesh by voluntary mortification to the spirit, and to mortify our evil desires as did St. Paul; (Col. I. 24.) to enable us to lead a pure life, and thus prepare for the holy festival of Easter, and the reception of the divine Lamb, Jesus: and, finally, to render God satisfaction for our sins, and do penance, as Pope Gregory says, for the sins of one whole year by one short fast, lasting only the tenth part of a year.

Was the fast of Lent observed in early times as in the present?

Yes, but more strictly; for the people of the early ages not only abstained from meat, but also from all that which is connected with it, such as eggs, butter, cheese, etc., even from wine and fish, although this was not the general command of the Church; they fasted all day, and only ate in the evening after vespers, in remembrance of which, vespers are now said before dinner-time, because the Church, as a kind mother, now permits the supper to be changed into a dinner, and also allows something to be taken in the evening, that the body may not be too much weakened, and become unfit for labor.

How much does this ancient custom put to shame the Christians of to-day who think the fast in our times too severe! "But," asks St. Ambrose, "what sort of Christians are they? Christ, who never sinned fasted for our sins, and we will not fast for our own great and numerous offences?"

How should the holy season of Lent be spent?

As according to the teaching of St. Leo, the main thing in fasting is not that the body be deprived of food, but that the mind at the same time be withdrawn from wickedness, we should endeavor during Lent, not only to be temperate in eating and drinking, but especially to lead a modest life, sanctifying the days by persevering prayer and devoutly attending church.

PRAYER AT THE BEGINNING OF LENT

Almighty God! I unite myself at the beginning of this holy season of penance with the Church militant, endeavoring to make these days of real sorrow for my sins and crucifixion of the sensual man. O Lord Jesus! in union with Thy fasting and passion, I offer Thee my fasting in obedience to the Church, for Thy honor, and in thanksgiving for the many favors I have received, in satisfaction for my sins and the sins of others, and that I may receive the grace to avoid such and such a sin, N. N. and to practice such and such a virtue, N. N.

More Dumb Cluck Stuff -- Which "United States" Was That?

 By Anna Von Reitz

It is extremely important to know which "United States" you are talking about at any given time, and I can show you why with a salutary example. Read this statement, which is absolutely true so far as it goes, except that it doesn't identify which United States it is referring to:
From the United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993: Vol. 33, page H-1303:
"It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government was dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments."
Scary stuff, right? It looks like our government went down the tubes many years ago. It looks like we are beggars. It looks like the creditors --banks for the most part-- own everything in sight. So it appears.
It appears that way because you don't know two very important things: (1) Which "United States" are they talking about? and (2) What kinds of entities are eligible for bankruptcy protection?
There are four (4) principle versions of "United States".
There is The United States, which is the name of the Union of States controlling our national soil jurisdiction. This is the actual nation-states we are talking about, gathered together in a Union to be able to act together in concert for their mutual benefit. Each member state is a sovereign entity, while the Union doing business as The United States is an unincorporated mutually affiliated business structure -- a Union.
There is also the for-now defunct Federal Republic, which was intended to be our primary Federal Subcontractor, but which has been out of service since 1860 pending reconstruction--- and which did business as "the" United States from 1787 to 1860. The members of the Federal Republic were unincorporated American businesses operating as States-of-States, like The State of Florida and The State of North Carolina, which have been moth-balled as State Trusts since the 1860's
There is the Territorial "United States", the British Territorial version that operates as an incorporated entity doing business under various names, such as "the" United States of America, Incorporated, and has 57 "States" that include incorporated Territorial States-of-States and United States Possessions and Insular States like Guam. These "States" exist primarily on paper and are the precursors of actual States of the Union as required by the Northwest Ordinance.
Finally, there is the Municipal "United States" --- the Papist formerly Holy Roman Empire version, which operates as an incorporated entity doing business under various names, and which also claims to have 57 "states" that include Municipal STATES-OF-STATES, US POSSESSIONS, and INSULAR STATES like GUAM. These STATES also exist on paper as incorporated entities, including US CORPORATIONS.
So, which "United States" went bankrupt in 1933?
We know it wasn't the Union, because the Union is unincorporated and not eligible for bankruptcy protection.
We know it wasn't the Federal Republic because it wasn't doing business at the time and like the Union, was never incorporated, and therefore never eligible for bankruptcy protection.
Of the two remaining options that were incorporated and were eligible for bankruptcy protection the "United States" that went bankrupt in 1933 had to be one of the two incorporated versions of "United States" -- the so-called Territorial United States or the Municipal United States.
Which one was it?
It could only be the Territorial version, doing business as "the" United States of America, Incorporated. We know this from many other public and private records, but the fact that it appeared in the Federal Record, was the subject of action by the U.S. Congress, resulted in "Public Laws" like 73-10, involved removal of the Gold Standard, and resulted in pledges by the Territorial State-of-State Governors at the March 6, 1933 Conference of Governors tells us without a doubt that it was the British Territorial Government, Incorporated, that went bankrupt.
We are able to deduce this easily, because we know what the principal entities called "United States" are or were, we know which ones operate as incorporated entities, and that tells us which were eligible for bankruptcy protection.
From there, we can deduce which entity was involved from the references and nature of the actions and where the public records were posted.
Contrary to what might have been your initial impression, our country and our government did not go bankrupt. Ever.
What went bankrupt was a British Territorial Corporation in the business of providing governmental services under contract, and like any insolvent corporation, it's offices were vacated in receivership and its franchises were held accountable for the parent corporation's debts.
It's only relationship to us was as a limited service provider under contract.
Except that this particular Federal Subcontractor was unable to pay its debts and unable to perform its functions, nothing much happened. A new Territorial corporation was quickly organized, took on a similar name, assumed a Successor to Contract position, and that was that.
Of course, the franchises doing business as, for example, the State of Ohio, were hard-pressed to pay off the debts of the erstwhile parent corporation, and the Territorial "citizenry" of Ohio was equally hard-pressed --- but in fact, none of this had anything to do with the millions of Americans who were subsequently "presumed" to be Territorial U.S. Citizens and coerced to pay debts they didn't owe.
Read that -- this 1933 bankruptcy had nothing to do with our version of "United States".
This neatly illustrates how and why the Queen and the Lord Mayor owe our country and our people a great deal of money and property returned, and why racketeering and impersonation and fraud ---crimes--- were committed to coerce and deceive Americans into paying these foreign debts.
It also explains why that particular incorporated bankrupt entity went off the gold standard. As an incorporated entity, it wasn't obligated to pay in gold, so they opted to pay in credit and fees and taxes and property collected from the victims of this scheme instead.
Our United States is still on the gold and silver standard --- never left it --- and it is still competent to actually pay debts. Our United States is the Priority Creditor of all the other versions of United States.
Their United States is on the Petrodollar, trying to rig an artificial shortage of oil and gas, to pump the prices ---and the corporate profits -- up.
And all this goes to show why it is important to know and ask which "United States" is being referenced, and what your relationship to it--- if any --- is.
The Perpetrators got away with this sleight of hand "mistaken identity" scheme in 1868, 1907, 1925, 1933, 1946, 1953, 1965, 1999, 2007, 2015, and now they are trying it again in 2022.

But we know which United States we are dealing with, and all the Other Creditors now know it, too.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Message for Texians

 By Anna Von Reitz

And here is what I sent back to Adam Cranston and also now to you. I am not going to waste my time arguing with you about this, Ed. The Proof is in the Pudding....
Texas exists and was enrolled as a State of the Union under the Northwest Ordinance like every other Territorial State of State in the Western United States effective October 1, 2020. This was long delayed as a result of the actual States of the Union not being in Session— the land and soil jurisdiction States could not be enrolled without their action, but the job finally got done almost two years ago.
Texas, Hawaii, Alaska, Nevada, Utah, Montana, Minnesota, West Virginia and numerous other States that were set up as Territorial States of States during and after the Civil War are now officially enrolled as States and have all the rights, duties, powers, and prerogatives of all the other Sovereign States of the Union.
Nine-tenths of what has had you guys stomping around mad was caused because you were living under the British Territorial Government instead of being accorded all the rights you were supposed to have as Americans living in a State of the Union.
Well, the rest of us finally woke up and took care of that long overdue piece of housekeeping and there is no doubt in the world that Texas, the State, does exist and is fully recognized as such.
Any idea that you have that this process was incorrect, unlawful, illegal, or anything else needs to be checked at the door. This is the same way that Wisconsin and Ohio became States and it is the way established by the original States of The United States of America in Congress Assembled for this to occur under the auspices of the Northwest Ordinance which is one of our Four Organic Laws.
So contrary to the Bushwah you have been thinking and teaching others, Texas is a State of the Union properly enrolled and my process will work as well in Texas and Hawaii as it will anywhere else including Alaska.
And believe me, given the fact that I live in Alaska, I have studied this issue and it’s remedy exhaustively and conclusively and as loathe as they were to let go of their custodial grip on our States, every single dog in the Department of Justice had lick to my feet.

Not that that should be necessary among friends….

----------------------------

See this article and over 3500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Law of Kinds

 By Anna Von Reitz

I wish to bring everyone's attention to bear on one of the most ancient, most fundamental, and most unarguable foundations of law --- The Law of Kinds, which is established in the Book of Genesis, where the Creator declares that each creation is ordered according to their kind: animals to animals, birds to birds, men to men, and so on.
This Law of Kinds also applies to all forms of Common Law and forms of law deriving from Common Law, so that there is a firm and not-to-be-trespassed boundary between living people and dead corporations, between fact and fiction.
The criminality that presently infests the world is caused by attempts to evade and circumvent the Law of Kinds, so as to redefine people as corporations and vice versa. This comprises a whole class of crimes known as "Personation Crimes" which include identity theft, false arrest, impersonation, unlawful conversion, human trafficking, kidnapping, racketeering, extortion, and fraud.
The courts that exist in America now are 99% foreign and virtually none of them have any official capacity to address a living American. They all depend on a ruse of mistaken identity and false claims of citizenship obligation to function.
These false claims of foreign citizenship obligation are propped up by falsified documents called "registrations" and specifically by "Birth Registrations" which are phony, but which stand until and unless people wake up and "record over them" and change the political status attached to their names by these registration documents.
So -- when you walk into one of these foreign courts, they already have "information" at their disposal that stands as evidence that you are a foreign citizen living here in this country as a "resident". They have a Birth Certificate showing that you are a Territorial U.S. Citizen and they have a BIRTH CERTIFICATE indicating that you are a Municipal CITIZEN of the United States, and they have nothing --- nada, zip, zero --- on any Public Record saying otherwise.
They accordingly treat you as a "foreign person" and prosecute you under foreign law.
And in a sense, you consent to this because you take no action to object to their presumptions and you do nothing to create admissible evidence rebutting the registrations they have created in your name.
This is how you, a living American, wind up in a foreign court of "strictly limited jurisdiction", without a clue as to how that court is viewing you or what kind of law you are being prosecuted under.
You have to object to this, and as much as possible, you have to present admissible evidence of the fact that you are an American without any foreign citizenship obligations.
The intention of a future act claiming back your birthright political status and estate as an American is not sufficient. Just saying, "Hey, I'm an American!" in court is not sufficient.
This is because you can be an American and still have foreign citizenship obligations --- like all those Americans who serve in the Federal Civil Service and all those who serve in the United States Military Service and all those Americans who serve as "officers" -- elected and otherwise, of various kinds of corporations.
The key issue that these Interlopers cling to is a presumption that you are "voluntarily" engaged as a Transactor in Commerce, because they have regulatory authority (however misinterpreted) over interstate commerce. Your exemption from this legal presumption is found in Section 16, the Enabling Clause, of the Federal Reserve Act.
You need to look them in the eye and say, "I am a living American without citizenship obligations. I am not a voluntary Transactor in commerce. I am exempt from your jurisdiction and I claim my exemptions, remedies, and reliefs,"
Then you need to plunk down a copy of the Birth Certificate or BIRTH CERTIFICATE issued in your name as evidence of the crime committed against you when you were just a baby, and a copy of your recorded declaration of political status standing as evidence in your favor.
It is both illegal and unlawful for these courts and agencies to "misaddress" you as if you were something you are not, or as if you were engaged in activities that you are not engaged in, but it is up to you to object and hold them feet first to the fire.
It is also up to you to invoke the Law of Kinds --- what are you, a living man, an American owed the Public Law including the Guarantees of the Constitutions, doing in a court that is limited to administering the affairs of corporations, public transmitting utilities, commercial vessels and foreign citizenry?
In every case the Prosecutor bears the burden of proof and he never does produce any public evidence of jurisdiction for himself or the court, because you never make him prove who he is and in what capacity he is acting, and you never stop to question the nature and jurisdiction of the courts you are facing.
Most people never create and bring forward evidence that compels the courts to stand down, either --- but that is changing.
When we first started this effort court wins were few and far between, but as we have amped up our declaration and recording processes and as more and more Americans have stepped up and defended their identity in court, the pendulum is swinging in our favor.
Remember that the Birth Certificates issued in your name provide powerful evidence of a crime committed against you when you were only a few days or weeks old, at a time when you could not possibly object or correct this foreign registration process--- or even be aware of it.
Remember that the Declarations of political status that you establish and record in Public prove who you are and the political status you claim in opposition to the phony registration that was foisted off on you as a baby.
Any foreign court faced with those two pieces of evidence, and your objection to being misaddressed and misrepresented as a foreign person, is looking down the equivalent of a double-barreled shotgun; what these looters have done to you in stealing your identity and misrepresenting your political status is a capital crime in international jurisdiction.

Just like rustling cattle, it's a hanging offense.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

News Flash --- Trudeau is Not Premier of Canada

 By Anna Von Reitz

A recent announcement out of Canada is good news, but also gives one cause to pause.
The last remaining signatory to the current Canadian Constitution and Charter of Rights, Brian Peckford, has stepped to the plate and opened not only the necessary public debate, but has also sued the present administration for violation of the Canadian Constitution put in place back in the 1980s.
This is important and noteworthy, because technically, Mr. Peckford is the only one with a direct contract with Trudeau's governmental services corporation, and is the only one with proper standing to bring the contract back into enforcement.
However, as Mr. Peckford constantly but unobtrusively reminds us, this contract is between the British Territorial Provinces established in the wake of the dissolution of the Commonwealth back circa 1965-67.
This "Constitution" Mr. Peckford is enforcing, is a Territorial Constitution between a foreign democracy that established itself in the 1980's in a custodial trust capacity and an equally foreign commercial services corporation doing business as something like CANADA, INC. -- Mr. Trudeau's lash-up.
None of this has anything to do with the Republic of Canada established by and for the People of Canada, which is supposed to be operating the land and soil jurisdiction of the country --- but strangely, isn't in Session. Same circumstance we have faced and overcome in America.
Americans are all supposed to be living in constitutional state republics and Canadians are supposed to be living in constitutional provincial republics, but because nobody realized what had to be done to bring these governments into Session, Canadians --- like their American Cousins -- were hornswoggled into being misrepresented as British Territorial citizenry, subjects of the Queen, wards of the Crown.
Constitutional republics are a different form of government from democracies. So, when Mr. Peckford like members of the U.S. [Territorial] Congress talks about their "democracies" ---they are telling you something.
They are shoving it in your face that the organization running what appears to be "your" government isn't your government.
Why? Because your actual Government isn't a democracy and never was.
They might as well be taking out a billboard ad and saying, "Hey, Dumb Clucks...."
The story then gets better or worse, depending on your view, because none of these democracies are truly functional, either.
First, they are all operating under color of law and conditions of fraud by omission, as they owe the people of America and Canada (both) full disclosure instead of surreptitious usurpation.
Second, as democracies, they have voter quotas that haven't been met ---- ever. In order to declare a mandate, a democracy requires a 51% decision. When was the last time that these democracies had a 51% agreement about anything?
As it takes 51% of the vote to win an election, tell me how Trudeau who received 20.3% of the vote could ever take office in a democracy?
He couldn't.
He's not the actual Premier of Canada, because then he would have to be acting for the People of Canada and representing the constitutional republic provinces, which haven't been heard from in fifty years.
He's not the Territorial Premier of Canada, Inc., because then, he would have to have over 50% of the votes cast in the election, and he fell far, far short of that.
So what ---exactly--- is Justin Trudeau?
He is the "Premier" of a commercial corporation in the business of providing governmental services, under contract to the British Territorial Democracy that is quietly usurping against the actual lawful Government of Canada while the people of Canada sleep.
Trudeau is a corporate CEO of a Municipal Corporation and he has no more actual power or authority than the CEO of McDonald's restaurants. He has no Public Office at all.
This is exactly the same situation that Joe Biden finds himself in.
What these commercial corporation CEO's have done is to lie about you and your country. They have claimed that you are "stateless" because you haven't bothered to bring your own government into Session for decades. And then, they have claimed you as "presumed to be" political asylum seekers and dependents, which is nothing but fraud and usurpation, Breach of Trust and Violation of Commercial Services Contract.
In Canada, as in America, this scheme has been implemented using the Birth Certificate Registration to "claim" you as part of their Territorial citizenry, instead of recording your nativity as a Canadian.
This is all just one big British commercial confidence racket using falsification of records implemented by turning Public Records into Registrations -- which is an act of unlawful conversion when imposed upon the victims without full disclosure and knowing consent.
And we will note, they are at it again, trying to unlawfully convert living men and women into "Genetically Modified Organisms" via the undisclosed injection of patented RNA and DNA---- and they are doing this for the same reason: to gain a commercial ownership interest in the bodies and land and other assets naturally belonging to these people.
They should all be flogged and their leaders should be gibbeted under the Law of the Sea.
They should all be hanged under the Law of the Land and Soil.
They should all be deprived of gain and pay large fines under the Roman Civil Law.
They should be imprisoned and drummed out of their Orders under Canon Law.
As for the people in Canada as in America, they must "record over" the false registration paperwork and record their lawful birthright political status as Canadians, and claim their DNA and enact laws (as we have already done) to prohibit the claim of any commercial patent interest in living men and women.

The next logical step is for their constitutional republics to nationalize all foreign corporations that have been chartered under their auspices during their purported absence, by those claiming to represent them.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Liberty Zone News Briefs

 Liberty Zone News Briefs

Forwarded from Patel Patriot
Here’s my take on what’s happening in Ukraine/Russia. I’m just spitballing here. Like everybody else I have more questions than I do answers but I think this plays into Devolution.

First think about what Ukraine is – It’s the epicenter of corruption for the political establishment. Victor Pinchuk, George Soros, Ihor Kolomoisky… All funding “deep state” agendas worldwide, all based out of Ukraine. We know their ties to the Clinton foundation and liberal politics in America.

If Trump was going to truly drain the swamp, he would have to tackle the corruption in Ukraine. The oligarchs have funded their own militaries in previous color revolutions. Trump could wouldn’t be able to take them down without a fight. So if Trump is going to clean up Ukraine he would likely need boots on the ground to do it.

Enter Putin.

It’s no secret that Putin hates Soros as he banned him from Russia long ago, and it’s also no secret that Putin despised the “deep state” tactics of implementing color revolutions to overthrow pro-Russian leaders and install ones that would play ball with the “deep state”. It’s speculated by many that Putin could be working with Trump in the fight against the “deep state” and it’s hard to argue with. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

So think of the brilliance that might be taking place right now.

Boots on the ground were likely necessary to fully remove the problem in Ukraine, but Trump couldn’t invade Ukraine with US troops. Somebody else would have to do it. However, if somebody like Putin were to do it while Trump was president, it would make Trump look week and the media would have a field day.

What better time to clean up the mess in Ukraine than with Biden in office? Kills two birds with one invasion. You make the Biden administration and the MSM look like fools, while taking on the “deep state” in one of the most corrupt countries on the planet.

Putin is simultaneously helping Trump to serve up red-pills while fixing a problem that actually benefits the USA and the rest of the world – the denazification of Ukraine.

We won’t have any definitive answers until this blows over but make sure you guys are using the 24 – hour rule with news reports coming out about this stuff.

EXCLUSIVE: Ukranian president demands a full refund of the millions in bribes to the Bidens

 


KYIV–Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has demanded a full refund for the millions of dollars he gave the Bidens after US President* Joe Biden let Russia invade Ukraine today.

“What do you think we actually thought Hunter Biden was a savvy businessman? You think he was worth all the money we paid that jackass?” Zelensky said in an exclusive phone interview with Genesius Times. “We even bought one of his god-awful paintings. You think we actually liked his art? Give me a break!”

Biden responded in a press release, “What do you think this is Amazon dot com? No refunds, sucker. Nada!”

It is estimated that corrupt officials in Ukraine funneled over $115 million to the Bidens since Biden was sworn in as vice president under Barack Obama.

Zelensky said he and his team “are going to make decisions in the coming hours, in the coming days, based on what’s in the best interest of them to get that money back,” Zelensky added. “Right now, I feel like it was just about the worst investment ever.”

Zelensky also threatened to remove all their Biden coins from Ukrainian circulation.

“We should never have issued a Biden coin in the first place,” Zelensky said.

Catherine Austin Fitts on Bitcoin, Gold and The Go Direct Reset

 https://rumble.com/vdzs47-catherine-austin-fitts-on-bitcoin-gold-and-the-go-direct-reset.html

Truckers - STAY HOME and STOP HAULING!

 Trudeau’s Police State, Truckers for Freedom, and the Coming Confrontation

https://newswithviews.com/trudeaus-police-state-truckers-for-freedom-and-the-coming-confrontation/

America’s First Experiment With Paper (Fiat) Money

 https://www.theepochtimes.com/americas-first-experiment-with-paper-fiat-money_4274641.html