By Anna Von Reitz
And here is what I sent back to Adam Cranston and also now to you. I am not going to waste my time arguing with you about this, Ed. The Proof is in the Pudding....
Texas exists and was enrolled as a State of the Union under the Northwest Ordinance like every other Territorial State of State in the Western United States effective October 1, 2020. This was long delayed as a result of the actual States of the Union not being in Session— the land and soil jurisdiction States could not be enrolled without their action, but the job finally got done almost two years ago.
Texas, Hawaii, Alaska, Nevada, Utah, Montana, Minnesota, West Virginia and numerous other States that were set up as Territorial States of States during and after the Civil War are now officially enrolled as States and have all the rights, duties, powers, and prerogatives of all the other Sovereign States of the Union.
Nine-tenths of what has had you guys stomping around mad was caused because you were living under the British Territorial Government instead of being accorded all the rights you were supposed to have as Americans living in a State of the Union.
Well, the rest of us finally woke up and took care of that long overdue piece of housekeeping and there is no doubt in the world that Texas, the State, does exist and is fully recognized as such.
Any idea that you have that this process was incorrect, unlawful, illegal, or anything else needs to be checked at the door. This is the same way that Wisconsin and Ohio became States and it is the way established by the original States of The United States of America in Congress Assembled for this to occur under the auspices of the Northwest Ordinance which is one of our Four Organic Laws.
So contrary to the Bushwah you have been thinking and teaching others, Texas is a State of the Union properly enrolled and my process will work as well in Texas and Hawaii as it will anywhere else including Alaska.
And believe me, given the fact that I live in Alaska, I have studied this issue and it’s remedy exhaustively and conclusively and as loathe as they were to let go of their custodial grip on our States, every single dog in the Department of Justice had lick to my feet.
Not that that should be necessary among friends….
See this article and over 3500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Can imagine the Republic of Texas don’t want a new master .thay claim breach of contract the republican form of government Guaranteed ..ReplyDelete
• Right bubba, of course they dont. *TEXANS* have claimed Right to Secede from their very beginning! even Missourians and Kansans know that!Delete
• Northwest Ordinance did not include Texas; only states to the west of, and above, the Ohio River were included; but also does not exclude Texas/other states that would be added later;
• the states were ABSOLUTELY NOT set up as Territorial (*BRITH*-ISH) States at all! but was ratified by the **CONFEDERATED** CONGRESS!!!
and ANNAVONINK IS TRYING TO GASLIGHT the people AGAIN, imo.
now ANNAVONINK is AGAIN trying to weave what was actually ratified by the American people in with the unratified U. S. Constitution(s) and ANNAVONINKS own made up story-telling... making it ever more difficult for people seeking the truth to find it, imo.
"So contrary to the Bushwah you have been thinking and teaching others, Texas is a State of the Union properly enrolled and my process will work as well in Texas and Hawaii as it will anywhere else including Alaska."
see that everyone?:
'...and **my** process will work as well in Texas...'
there you go people, ANNAVONINK just came out and admitted that IT is making up its *OWN* process and is NOT THEN USING THE PROCESSES RATIFIED FROM CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED THAT OUR FATHERS CREATED FOR US AND OUR FRIENDS under the Declaration of Independence!!!
(YOU MIGHT WANT TO MAKE NOTE OF/ HARDCOPY THIS ARTICLE BEFORE ITS DELETED???)
Is this little detail the reason we (Texas) didn’t have standing before the US Supreme Court to contest the ‘20 election fraud?ReplyDelete
i believe it was briefly disclosed at one point by AltMedia that it could not be heard because it was brought to the Supreme Court either in a FORM or a JURISDICTION that the SupCt had no jurisdiction over. ...im thinking it was no subject matter jurisdiction, but did not commit the details to memory, so
if you re-search this, would you post your findings here? thanks!
may be as simple as "nobody had standing" because "nothing happened." It is legal to lie to the american people per ndaa, and no crime has occurred by "stealing" a fake election. They are actors acting, and telling us exactly what theyre doing. Remember tweety trump during campaign ? Disclosure! "the system is rigged! the election is a fraud!" This was before "the steal," so he meant something else. We know now what he was telling the "adults in the room"- corresponds to the US Corpse ceasing to exist within 3 days following the election date, (enter circus mode, send in the clowns! aaaaannndd...ACTION!)? This to me is the only explanation for the reason those celebrity attys paraded the facts in/as/of evidence on the public record, slam dunk in your face! Yet, the blackrobes turn their backs at every venue refusing to hear it or see it. (script sound familiar, ring any bells?) Welcome to the show, people. are you not entertained?Delete
yes leslie, what PaulRW writes rings a bell... no standing before the court/ nothing happened: /"no subject matter jurisdiction" over "Nothing".Delete
pertaining to PaulRW's recount of what "they" claim/presume/ other to have used to furnish so-called "disclosure" to us:Delete
• we are man.
• man uses voice to talk to man.
• we speak using American common language only, it is the only language we know or under-stand.
•being man we do not speak in pictures,
hand or foot gestures,
old wives tales,
or other FICTIONS...
.... and there is no law that requires that we do.
AGAIN: (MEMORIZE THIS EVERYBODY???---:):):) )
THIS IS ANOTHER ***KEY***!!!)
there is no law that requires that i:man know (any) language other than (my) "native tongue".
and it is so.
American (and other) common law.
Who is Ed?ReplyDelete
Ed was president of the Republic of Texas dejour. Currently a very influential member of Congress, run the common law courts covertly.Delete
Produced the tax conference call in with Cary zoleman. Very religious and trustworthy.
THE INTERNET OF BODIESReplyDelete
a preview of products including wearable baby monitors to monitor their breathing and o2 and all kinds of shitDelete
My mom needs stents or so they sayReplyDelete
Test and scans out the ass to prepare for the surgery
Read page 7
Implantable Smart Stents
The patient doesn't have a clue they are being monitored remotely that I am aware of
Cannot tell her what to do but if she gets this stent, I have no doubt it will be a SMART Stent implanted and she will be monitored remotely without her consent or knowledge it has even been done?
It says it alerts the PROVIDERS?
But without it she is 'afraid' of dying
Dental 'health' and the solution to the covid economic 'problems'ReplyDelete
REMOTE DENTAL MONITORING
Dental implants anyone