Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Saturday, February 26, 2022

Message for Texians

 By Anna Von Reitz

And here is what I sent back to Adam Cranston and also now to you. I am not going to waste my time arguing with you about this, Ed. The Proof is in the Pudding....
Texas exists and was enrolled as a State of the Union under the Northwest Ordinance like every other Territorial State of State in the Western United States effective October 1, 2020. This was long delayed as a result of the actual States of the Union not being in Session— the land and soil jurisdiction States could not be enrolled without their action, but the job finally got done almost two years ago.
Texas, Hawaii, Alaska, Nevada, Utah, Montana, Minnesota, West Virginia and numerous other States that were set up as Territorial States of States during and after the Civil War are now officially enrolled as States and have all the rights, duties, powers, and prerogatives of all the other Sovereign States of the Union.
Nine-tenths of what has had you guys stomping around mad was caused because you were living under the British Territorial Government instead of being accorded all the rights you were supposed to have as Americans living in a State of the Union.
Well, the rest of us finally woke up and took care of that long overdue piece of housekeeping and there is no doubt in the world that Texas, the State, does exist and is fully recognized as such.
Any idea that you have that this process was incorrect, unlawful, illegal, or anything else needs to be checked at the door. This is the same way that Wisconsin and Ohio became States and it is the way established by the original States of The United States of America in Congress Assembled for this to occur under the auspices of the Northwest Ordinance which is one of our Four Organic Laws.
So contrary to the Bushwah you have been thinking and teaching others, Texas is a State of the Union properly enrolled and my process will work as well in Texas and Hawaii as it will anywhere else including Alaska.
And believe me, given the fact that I live in Alaska, I have studied this issue and it’s remedy exhaustively and conclusively and as loathe as they were to let go of their custodial grip on our States, every single dog in the Department of Justice had lick to my feet.

Not that that should be necessary among friends….


See this article and over 3500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.


  1. Can imagine the Republic of Texas don’t want a new master .thay claim breach of contract the republican form of government Guaranteed ..

    1. • Right bubba, of course they dont. *TEXANS* have claimed Right to Secede from their very beginning! even Missourians and Kansans know that!
      • Northwest Ordinance did not include Texas; only states to the west of, and above, the Ohio River were included; but also does not exclude Texas/other states that would be added later;
      • the states were ABSOLUTELY NOT set up as Territorial (*BRITH*-ISH) States at all! but was ratified by the **CONFEDERATED** CONGRESS!!!
      now ANNAVONINK is AGAIN trying to weave what was actually ratified by the American people in with the unratified U. S. Constitution(s) and ANNAVONINKS own made up story-telling... making it ever more difficult for people seeking the truth to find it, imo.
      "So contrary to the Bushwah you have been thinking and teaching others, Texas is a State of the Union properly enrolled and my process will work as well in Texas and Hawaii as it will anywhere else including Alaska."
      see that everyone?:
      '...and **my** process will work as well in Texas...'
      there you go people, ANNAVONINK just came out and admitted that IT is making up its *OWN* process and is NOT THEN USING THE PROCESSES RATIFIED FROM CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED THAT OUR FATHERS CREATED FOR US AND OUR FRIENDS under the Declaration of Independence!!!

  2. Is this little detail the reason we (Texas) didn’t have standing before the US Supreme Court to contest the ‘20 election fraud?

    1. leslie,
      i believe it was briefly disclosed at one point by AltMedia that it could not be heard because it was brought to the Supreme Court either in a FORM or a JURISDICTION that the SupCt had no jurisdiction over. thinking it was no subject matter jurisdiction, but did not commit the details to memory, so
      if you re-search this, would you post your findings here? thanks!

    2. may be as simple as "nobody had standing" because "nothing happened." It is legal to lie to the american people per ndaa, and no crime has occurred by "stealing" a fake election. They are actors acting, and telling us exactly what theyre doing. Remember tweety trump during campaign ? Disclosure! "the system is rigged! the election is a fraud!" This was before "the steal," so he meant something else. We know now what he was telling the "adults in the room"- corresponds to the US Corpse ceasing to exist within 3 days following the election date, (enter circus mode, send in the clowns! aaaaannndd...ACTION!)? This to me is the only explanation for the reason those celebrity attys paraded the facts in/as/of evidence on the public record, slam dunk in your face! Yet, the blackrobes turn their backs at every venue refusing to hear it or see it. (script sound familiar, ring any bells?) Welcome to the show, people. are you not entertained?

    3. yes leslie, what PaulRW writes rings a bell... no standing before the court/ nothing happened: /"no subject matter jurisdiction" over "Nothing".

    4. pertaining to PaulRW's recount of what "they" claim/presume/ other to have used to furnish so-called "disclosure" to us:
      • we are man.
      • man uses voice to talk to man.
      • we speak using American common language only, it is the only language we know or under-stand.

      •being man we do not speak in pictures,
      hand or foot gestures,
      old wives tales,
      or other FICTIONS...

      .... and there is no law that requires that we do.


    5. ************************
      THIS IS ANOTHER ***KEY***!!!)

      there is no law that requires that i:man know (any) language other than (my) "native tongue".
      and it is so.
      American (and other) common law.


  3. Replies
    1. Ed was president of the Republic of Texas dejour. Currently a very influential member of Congress, run the common law courts covertly.
      Produced the tax conference call in with Cary zoleman. Very religious and trustworthy.


    1. a preview of products including wearable baby monitors to monitor their breathing and o2 and all kinds of shit

  5. My mom needs stents or so they say
    Test and scans out the ass to prepare for the surgery

    Read page 7
    Implantable Smart Stents
    The patient doesn't have a clue they are being monitored remotely that I am aware of

    Cannot tell her what to do but if she gets this stent, I have no doubt it will be a SMART Stent implanted and she will be monitored remotely without her consent or knowledge it has even been done?

    It says it alerts the PROVIDERS?

    But without it she is 'afraid' of dying

  6. Dental 'health' and the solution to the covid economic 'problems'

    Dental implants anyone