Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Saturday, February 26, 2022

News Flash --- Trudeau is Not Premier of Canada

 By Anna Von Reitz

A recent announcement out of Canada is good news, but also gives one cause to pause.
The last remaining signatory to the current Canadian Constitution and Charter of Rights, Brian Peckford, has stepped to the plate and opened not only the necessary public debate, but has also sued the present administration for violation of the Canadian Constitution put in place back in the 1980s.
This is important and noteworthy, because technically, Mr. Peckford is the only one with a direct contract with Trudeau's governmental services corporation, and is the only one with proper standing to bring the contract back into enforcement.
However, as Mr. Peckford constantly but unobtrusively reminds us, this contract is between the British Territorial Provinces established in the wake of the dissolution of the Commonwealth back circa 1965-67.
This "Constitution" Mr. Peckford is enforcing, is a Territorial Constitution between a foreign democracy that established itself in the 1980's in a custodial trust capacity and an equally foreign commercial services corporation doing business as something like CANADA, INC. -- Mr. Trudeau's lash-up.
None of this has anything to do with the Republic of Canada established by and for the People of Canada, which is supposed to be operating the land and soil jurisdiction of the country --- but strangely, isn't in Session. Same circumstance we have faced and overcome in America.
Americans are all supposed to be living in constitutional state republics and Canadians are supposed to be living in constitutional provincial republics, but because nobody realized what had to be done to bring these governments into Session, Canadians --- like their American Cousins -- were hornswoggled into being misrepresented as British Territorial citizenry, subjects of the Queen, wards of the Crown.
Constitutional republics are a different form of government from democracies. So, when Mr. Peckford like members of the U.S. [Territorial] Congress talks about their "democracies" ---they are telling you something.
They are shoving it in your face that the organization running what appears to be "your" government isn't your government.
Why? Because your actual Government isn't a democracy and never was.
They might as well be taking out a billboard ad and saying, "Hey, Dumb Clucks...."
The story then gets better or worse, depending on your view, because none of these democracies are truly functional, either.
First, they are all operating under color of law and conditions of fraud by omission, as they owe the people of America and Canada (both) full disclosure instead of surreptitious usurpation.
Second, as democracies, they have voter quotas that haven't been met ---- ever. In order to declare a mandate, a democracy requires a 51% decision. When was the last time that these democracies had a 51% agreement about anything?
As it takes 51% of the vote to win an election, tell me how Trudeau who received 20.3% of the vote could ever take office in a democracy?
He couldn't.
He's not the actual Premier of Canada, because then he would have to be acting for the People of Canada and representing the constitutional republic provinces, which haven't been heard from in fifty years.
He's not the Territorial Premier of Canada, Inc., because then, he would have to have over 50% of the votes cast in the election, and he fell far, far short of that.
So what ---exactly--- is Justin Trudeau?
He is the "Premier" of a commercial corporation in the business of providing governmental services, under contract to the British Territorial Democracy that is quietly usurping against the actual lawful Government of Canada while the people of Canada sleep.
Trudeau is a corporate CEO of a Municipal Corporation and he has no more actual power or authority than the CEO of McDonald's restaurants. He has no Public Office at all.
This is exactly the same situation that Joe Biden finds himself in.
What these commercial corporation CEO's have done is to lie about you and your country. They have claimed that you are "stateless" because you haven't bothered to bring your own government into Session for decades. And then, they have claimed you as "presumed to be" political asylum seekers and dependents, which is nothing but fraud and usurpation, Breach of Trust and Violation of Commercial Services Contract.
In Canada, as in America, this scheme has been implemented using the Birth Certificate Registration to "claim" you as part of their Territorial citizenry, instead of recording your nativity as a Canadian.
This is all just one big British commercial confidence racket using falsification of records implemented by turning Public Records into Registrations -- which is an act of unlawful conversion when imposed upon the victims without full disclosure and knowing consent.
And we will note, they are at it again, trying to unlawfully convert living men and women into "Genetically Modified Organisms" via the undisclosed injection of patented RNA and DNA---- and they are doing this for the same reason: to gain a commercial ownership interest in the bodies and land and other assets naturally belonging to these people.
They should all be flogged and their leaders should be gibbeted under the Law of the Sea.
They should all be hanged under the Law of the Land and Soil.
They should all be deprived of gain and pay large fines under the Roman Civil Law.
They should be imprisoned and drummed out of their Orders under Canon Law.
As for the people in Canada as in America, they must "record over" the false registration paperwork and record their lawful birthright political status as Canadians, and claim their DNA and enact laws (as we have already done) to prohibit the claim of any commercial patent interest in living men and women.

The next logical step is for their constitutional republics to nationalize all foreign corporations that have been chartered under their auspices during their purported absence, by those claiming to represent them.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

17 comments:

  1. "Americans are all supposed to be living in constitutional state republics and Canadians are ..."

    WRONG AGAIN ANNAVONINK!
    WRONG
    WRONG
    WRONG!

    Look at it everybody..

    last paragraph of *YOUR* original and only true Declaration of Independence, july 2,(TWO), 1776!:

    "....solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States.... and that as Free and Independent States, they have full power.... and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do....".
    not a republic.
    not a democracy.
    not a monarchy.
    not an oligarchy.
    not a theocracy.

    Free and Independent States.
    and it is so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. now following after that,
      man living on virginia land chose for themselves to have a *Commonwealth* *FORM* for their Government;
      and man living on land known as Texas chose to set up a Republic for their own *FORM* of Government;
      and man living on land known as Missouri, and Kansas, both chose to have a Free and Independent State *FORM* for their Governments; that is: not following any previously used Form, but designing a new government the way the people decided they wanted to live. Free and Independent.
      and it is so.

      Delete
    2. "Americans are all supposed to be living in constitutional state republics and Canadians are ..."

      ANYBODY!
      Anybody know where annavonink is pulling this from? :):):)

      it doesnt exist!
      AGAIN... :):):) pulling things out of their..... er ah... hat:)??

      if not, SHOW ME AND I WILL GLADLY STAND CORRECTED AND WILL HUMBLY APOLOGIZE.

      Delete
    3. "ought"; lot of things ought to be other than what they are.

      Delete
    4. aleon423
      you trying to make a point about my comment? ...or just ruminating after having a bad day?

      Delete
    5. Weird, accusatory gibberish should never be confused with genuine commentary. K? :)

      Delete
    6. Woman:janmarie -- please ASAP read Anna's article entitled 'For All The Jural Assemblies-49 Republic or Republican, Civil or Civilian' -- this will certainly clarify which terms our laws of the land truly pertain to and why. Thanks much.

      Delete
    7. anonymous,
      you need to clarify or youre counted as just another GASBAG! :)
      who are you talking to? if youre talking to me, i want to answer you.
      step out from behind your anonymity and your cryptic, unspecified accusations and say what youve got to say and say who youre directing it to so whoever youre trying to insult can answer!! K?? :):)

      Delete
    8. unknown,
      thanks for your mature response.
      i will re-read it at your suggestion, thank you for caring enough about everyones wellbeing and our futures to make a well informed comment.
      _____
      i do want to disclose though that i have not found at least 40% of what ANNAVONINK writes to be verifiable.
      as i just pointed out in a comment to bubba in a recent article, ANNAVON comes right out and says that they are making up their own process: ..."my process"...
      but i will re-read the article you suggest. thanks!

      Delete
  2. The political leader of Canada is the Prime Minister and the political leader of a province is called a Premier.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The problem is like what Sheriff Joe Encounterd when proving the birth certificate of Barry Satiro was a fraud no one would support him , they knew APAC and the other arm of the trid the is thair tool so you can be right as rain and you got nothing .
    Mow was right all politics Gomes out the barrel of a gun.

    ReplyDelete
  4. go to Anna's website and read her article called, "For All The Jural Assemblies - 49 Republic or Republican, Civil or Civilian" as soon as you can -- these terms all refer to different things and this is extremely important to understand. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  5. woman:janmarie doesn't tell us who you are any more than Unknown doesn't tell us who he or she is any more than EarthSun tell you who I am. We all know who Anna and Paul are they hide behind nothing. Yes sometimes Anna writes things that for me make little or no sense. But that is listening to my head. Way back when my heart said keep reading and so I have and the more you read the more of the big picture you can see. For Anna and her team of many this has been an effort of putting together the pieces of a vast puzzle and yes when we all sit down to a good puzzle project we try to put a few pieces where we thot they would fit but alas don't. So keep reading and the big picture will come into view. My two cents.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. earthsun,
      you are wrong and speak ignorantly about me.
      it seems you want to appear wise,..:):)
      but your words show you dont pay attention: making your information faulty and pointless. :)

      woman:janmarie

      Delete
    2. earthsun, also, i have actually said more than once exactly who i am. you can look up my father:man:simon, family "kenton", naturalborn on virginia, land, around "1755" (ref.:) in the Daughters of the American Revolution, Inc. (DAR)website, Ancestor A065086: Captain, American War for Independence, along with his brothers, my uncles. fathersimon was also Brigadier General, Ohio Militiamen, War of 1812. Scouted with Daniel Boone and Simon Girty, POW: Shawnee Nation.AW4I.

      _____
      what you do not seem to realize yet is that Annavonink is actually a group of lawyers.

      the woman:*annamaria* says she is a woman with no legal training or degree.
      could she possibly write 3-6 legal articles a day then? i say no.
      ______
      i do appreciate the heart of your comment to me, but you will surely want to continue looking into WHO ANNAVONINK is because its a datcomb. commercial.

      i hope you stick around.
      you may begin to see PAST the big picture thats being painted for you by someone elses brushstrokes.

      all the best to you.
      woman:janmarie

      Delete
  6. I'm confused; the vaccine gives them property rights. If you go away on vacation and I go in and repaint the inside of your house, does it make it mine? I take otc meds every day does that give them rights too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. the oracle,
      i believe the "hook" they try to sink is that they PATENTED the jabberjuice: a modifier of genetics; and now the organisim, the man, so-modified now belongs to them by way of the PATENT.

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE Anonymous or unknown; YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.