Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 5100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.

Sunday, July 5, 2020


By Anna Von Reitz

I remember picking bouquets of wild bittersweet in Wisconsin as a child and making wreaths of the orange-berried vines to hang on the doors of the house as a fall-time decoration. 

This was simple enough to do and made a cheerful long-lasting wreath that lasted through Thanksgiving, when again, we’d venture out into the forest and collect fragrant pine boughs for Christmas wreaths.  

Everything had its place and its season, it’s colors and it’s smells.  

Fourth of July was no different.  

Always blueberry pie. Always watermelon. Always days on cool silvan lakes and afternoon walks on shaded paths covered deep in pine needles. Always chasing fireflies and whirling trails  of comet-like sparklers in the still evening air and at night, everyone sprawled on picnic blankets along the lakeshore or perched above the dam reservoir watching the public fireworks.  

Everyone knew everybody in our little town, for better or worse.  You had a place in the scheme of things, just like you had a known face.  And all the grown-ups watched over all the children like so many eagles, ready to swoop down from on high to correct our squabbles and guide our play. 

We just took them for granted and never thought their job would fall to us one day.

The word “bittersweet” came to me in another context today from our Wisconsin Assembly via the recount of the lonely experience of going to a family picnic and both seeing the ranks decimated by Covid Fear and knowing that you are the only one present who knows the history and the present condition of the People’s Government. 

Funny how we all celebrate the government of, for, and by the People, though most of us no longer know what that is, what it means, and that we have to participate in it to make it real and give it life. 

Otherwise, we are just celebrating a hazy memory and trotting out the bunting. 

Someone else suggested that our government is wired “Catholic” with a single man at the helm, to which I observed— no, it isn’t. 

The Federal Government may have that kind of hierarchy with power flowing from the top down, but the actual government of this country (when in Session) operates in the exact opposite direction— from the bottom up, with the least among us having just as much to say as any President. 

So ask yourselves, where is that government now?  When is the last time you actually pulled an oar and took active part in self-governance?   And didn’t just hand away your power and your proxy to some unaccountable politician? 

There are, because some of us cared enough to think and to read, fifty State Assemblies —- the properly populated Assemblies of, for, and by the People of this country have finally come home and are clearing for action, getting ready to take care of long overdue business. 

And where are you? Standing around staring at the fireworks, watching the celebration of something that you have otherwise forgotten? 

Wake up, America. Remember who you are. Stand up and restore your government. Join your State Assembly and make it real.  

The health of our country depends on the checks and balances our Forefathers built into our government.  

The check on top-down Federal police power must be provided by the bottom-up power of the People’s Government — and you all need to be part of it. 


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Little Rain Cloud

By Anna Von Reitz

My Mother described me in terms of being a "stubborn little rain cloud" of the kind that appears in the late afternoon and by bedtime has become a storm, complete with thunder and lightning.
Guilty as charged. I appear as a harbinger of things to come.
A great many patriots who have been depending, waiting, and believing that surely, Mr. Trump would deliver the long-awaited disclosures on July 4th---- have been sadly disappointed.
No whisper of any gallant military intervention in Business as Usual. No hint that the traitors in Congress have been dealt with. No, nothing of the sort. No announcements about new currency or rescued children or even an end to the senselessly destructive Covid-19 Farce.
Just more platitudes about what a great country this is and how inventive and plucky and talented our people are.
In fact the only real message the President Trump delivered was veiled as an attributed saying of Martin Luther King, Jr., almost an hour and forty minutes (1:38:44) into the Mount Rushmore speech, in which MLK (and Donald Trump) assert that our Founding Fathers signed a "Promissory Note" applying to future generations.
Well, Mr. President, let's all have a look at that premise right now.
What happens to their debts when people die? They are supposed to be collected from their estate or written off; they are in no case supposed to accrue as debt owed by their progeny.
Yet, using this idea of a non-existent "Promissory Note" ---generations of Americans have been saddled with debts that they do not in fact owe.
All debts of all Americans were paid off during the Andrew Jackson Administration and no further indebtedness was entered into (much to the chagrin of the European Central Banks) by Americans ever since.
We are in fact the Priority Creditors of these institutions, including the Federal Reserve.
So why is President Trump standing there in the shoes of FDR, referring to Promissory Notes written by the Founders? All their promissory notes have been paid off since before the Civil War.
The entire debt accrued since then has not been at the behest of the American States and People. Instead, all those Promissory Notes have been signed by British Territorial U.S. Citizens, most of whom don't exist, and by Municipal PERSONS that don't exist, either.
Think of a fraud scheme in which 640 million fake "legal persons" are created out of thin air, via the use of unconscionable contracting processes, and the assets of the people these "legal persons" are named after, are attached as collateral backing the debts of these poppets? These voo-doo doll-like "legal constructs"?
That's what has been going on here in this country ever since the Civil War. And we have been conscripted and enslaved and our property assets have been stolen to pay the debts of these fabricated "citizens".
Mr. Trump, do you really want to talk about Promissory Notes and debts owed by the Founding Fathers? I think you should instead pay attention to the Promissory Notes being floated by members of the U.S. Congress and the "Congress of the [Municipal] United States".
All our debts are long paid and we have stood on the Creditor side of the ledger since the days of Andrew Jackson. The debts are not ours and we did not knowingly or willingly conscript ourselves and neither did our Mothers "donate" us as Wards of any Territorial State of State.
These horrible and egregious wrongs against the American States and People will not go away or be misinterpreted as anything but the criminal and predatory Breach of Trust and Commercial Contract that they are.
Your corporations, Mr. Trump, and their Principals, are at fault.
You guys have been the ones writing all the Promissory Notes against our assets behind our backs and you are the ones that owe us a complete accounting and a forthright and honest settlement of all these accounts that you have created "in our names" without any authority or conscionable contract to do so.
We stand upon the land and soil of this great country and no amount of European charlatanism will change the facts. This horrific commercial fraud and crime against your Employers has got to end.
In recent days, it has been rumored that you, Mr. Trump, have out-blackmailed the professional blackmailers at the Vatican. We have been informed of this dubious triumph, but the end effect is that we have a better blackmailer working for us, as opposed to having an honest government and the moral high ground that the American States and People are owed.
If we leave it at the cheaters being out-cheated, what good is that?
The times will change and more cheating will abound, new and different excuses for enslaving future generations will be found. How does what you proposed --- the existence of "promissory notes" written by earlier generations--- correct the actual problem, which is systemic, institutionalized commercial and international fraud and Breach of Trust against the American people?
It doesn't.
And that's why, Mr. Trump, despite all the nice words for this Fourth of July, your actions fall far short of any satisfactory answer or due correction.


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

What Kind of "Assembly"?

By Anna Von Reitz

Some patriots point to the fact that there were Christian assemblies functioning as elements of the government that existed prior to the Revolution and try to make a case for thinking that Christian assemblies are what are referenced with respect to our lawful government.  This is not true. 

Our Founders made a very decided choice when constructing our government and they very purposefully did not create a theocracy of any kind.  

They wanted to avoid the kind of religious oppression that they and their ancestors experienced in Europe and they knew that in order to secure freedom of religion for themselves, they would have to guarantee freedom of religion for everyone else. 

The Separation of Church and State was adopted, and religion was (hopefully forever) admitted to be a private matter.  

This wise decision on their part and the creation of secular State Assemblies to run the government of this country, is what keeps radical Muslim and Jewish groups at bay and prevents the kind of religious strife that consumes other countries to this day.  

So our State Assemblies are not Christian assemblies and not meant to be. Our State Assemblies are secular in nature, and everyone of every creed, color, and ethnicity is welcome to participate. 

Another important point about our State Assemblies, is that they are not State-of-State "Assemblies".  

Along with the other semantic deceits that have crept into popular use is the misuse of the word "Assembly" to describe State-of-State organizations composed of U.S. Citizens or even "citizens of the United States".  

These organizations are properly called "societies" or "associations" ----  but the pernicious mis-labeling of these groups has led to no end of confusion and continued attempts by U.S. Citizens and Municipal citizens of the United States to form "assemblies". 

State Assemblies are formed by the American People claiming their singular allegiance to their State of the Union.  

Any group of American Persons owing allegiance to the British Monarch or the Pope, is not an assembly by definition, and everyone concerned needs to be fully aware of that fact. 

This is why actual State Assemblies are at such pains to be sure that all members complete their paperwork and declarations and record the same, so that the honor and nature of the State Assembly is unsullied and their authority is unquestionable with regard to the land and soil of this country.  

Any one who wishes to retain any vestige of allegiance to the British Monarch or the Pope is foreclosed from joining the State Assembly and operating as a State Citizen.  Our Forefathers separated the jurisdictions to prevent conflicts of interest and we maintain that separation for the same reasons. 

Finally, let it be noted throughout that while our Public Government is Secular and Non-Sectarian, our British and Papal Subcontractors have adopted structures opposed to our government.  

The British Territorial Government is a democracy. 

The Papist Municipal Government is a theocracy.  

And our actual government is neither.  

So, when you join an actual State Assembly as a State Citizen, be prepared to chuck all other affiliations and allegiances at the door.  Realize that you are not part of any democracy or a theocracy of any kind anymore; you are instead one of the living progeny, one of the People of this country, living in a republican State of the Union.  

Actual State Assembly = republican State of the Union = American People = Jural Assemblies.

Subcontracting British Territorial Government = Democracy = U.S. Citizens = Jural Societies and Associations.

Subcontracting Municipal Government = Theocracy = "citizens of the United States" = Jural Commissions and Councils.

When our actual State Assemblies encounter would-be members who don't (1) knowingly and willingly produce their proper Declarations or (2) fail to publicly record the same or (3) persist in speaking and acting in terms of Federal or Municipal code (which is all foreign law to us), or (4) follow a pattern of trying to use the Assembly for their personal grievances or (5) cause disruption to the good order and function and credibility and honor of the Assembly ----- our Assemblies are encouraged to educate such people if possible, and to, if necessary, ban them from participation.  

Having the right to participate in a State Assembly is based upon acceptance of the grave public responsibility involved.  This requires a thorough understanding of exactly which level of government the actual State Assembly occupies and the capacity in which the State Assembly acts.  

Those who mistake the actual State Assembly for a State-of-State "Assembly" (should be called a "Society" or "Association")  and those who would attempt to commandeer our State Assembly to function as a State-of-State level entity, must be barred from participation. 


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Anna von Reitz on the Fundamentals

How We the People, Owning the Land, Can Reject Banks & Debt

Found Here:

Friday, July 3, 2020

The Act of 1871 Was Repealed

By Anna Von Reitz

The Act of 1871 was indeed passed in 1871. Repealed in 1874. Then by piecemeal finally revived and passed in 1877, implemented in 1878. And it had precious little to do with us, as it was actually a restructuring of one of the foreign Federal Subcontractors to better avoid culpability for and to profit from crimes that the same Guilty Parties had already committed against us. 

After the Civil War the victorious Union Army that fought for the Northern Confederation  reorganized what was left of the Federal Territorial Government to settle the bankruptcy Lincoln started in 1863, which he declared the day after he  issued  the first ever Executive Order—- General Order 100.  

Among other things prior to the Act of 1871, a Scottish Commercial Corporation merely calling itself  “The United States of America, Incorporated” foisted off it’s corporate Articles of Incorporation as “the” Constitution in 1868. 

So they formed a substitute entity, a foreign commercial corporation, named it after us, and started doing business “in our names”—- impersonating us and illegally accessing our assets and credit— starting in 1868.  

And in 1871, they began this same process of impersonation “for” the District of Columbia— by creating the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation.  

Call me old-fashioned, but the Switcheroo that took place in 1868 is what should be of most concern to us as Americans, and only secondarily should the corollary fraud taking place in the District of Columbia concern us.

In both cases, the actual government was usurped and our assets seized upon illegally and unlawfully via members of “the US” Congress pretending to “represent” us and all operated under conditions of non-disclosure, fraud, breach of trust, and deceit. 

To put it bluntly— instead of functioning as our Fiduciary Deputies in the office we defined for them, these Post-Civil War reprobates evaded that responsibility and began operating as  “Trustees” of our State assets, and as our purported proxies voting “for” us in their own corporate shareholder elections.

And they never told us a word about all these  arrangements being made “for” us and in our names. 

The actual American Government was thus by-passed and settled into dormancy while  our Employees contrived to become our Masters—-literally. 

Yes, the Act of 1871 is a window on the process of this criminality overtaking a foreign subcontractor of ours, but that’s hardly our concern.  A subcontractor of ours could choose to reorganize its own internal affairs and decide to incorporate its business and it’s no skin off our noses, is it? 

What is really important about the Act of 1871 is that it shows what went on in Scotland and America in 1868. 

And all without our knowledge or permission. 


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Chinese Elders. Yeah, Right

By Anna Von Reitz

The only Chinese person in this story was posing as a Filipino.  

Ferdinand Marcos, who as President of the “independent Government of the Philippines” set up in 1934 to act as Trustee for our gold reserves stored in the Philippine Islands— was Chinese. 

And his family was involved in international banking in the Orient for generations, all the way back to the Plum Blossom Bank.  

So we have a real Blue Blood Chinese banking family overlord —Marcos— in charge of the Government of the Philippines (Inc.) which was set up specifically to act as Trustee of American gold that was illegally and immorally transported to the Philippines beginning in the 1890’s by a Scottish Commercial Corporation infringing on our Trademarks and Copyrights and conducting business “in our names” without our knowledge or permission. 

That they got away with it this long is emblematic of the secrecy they maintained about all this for the better part of a century. 

What happens in Hong Kong stays in Hong Kong, and the same for Manila, because when people face facts the fantasies disappear. 

To be sure, not all the gold in the Philippines is American, but a substantial portion of it is and there is no getting around that.

The Chinese-Philippine Government connect is not what it appears to be,  then or now.   The gold in question isn’t Chinese and never was Filipino, either.  

So this whole idea that “the Chinese Elders” should be allowed to glom into our assets at the Behest of the World Bank, and determine whether we get our gold back or not, is ludicrous. 

Now, I know a lot of people don’t like my sober opinion of the RV,  either, but use your common sense—- if someone admits that they are able to do an RV,  they are also admitting to being criminals who achieved a total take over and manipulation of the currency markets worldwide. 

THAT is the reason that an RV can’t proceed in the way that the gurus describe it.

They’ve “gotten away with their crimes” many times, but admitting it in public is a different thing. 

The basis of the RV would purportedly be vast new mineral deposit discoveries in Zimbabwe, which would wildly increase the value of that country’s Assets and Currency.  

However, the discovery of massive mineral deposits in Zimbabwe is decades old, and what is really more to the point is their success or failure at getting a puppet installed as head of the government there. 

As we speak the “Chinese” (banker) “Elders”
are leaving the US and going to Zimbabwe to discuss the situation and cut “the US” out of the “RV”, but that may not be so easy or advisable to do. 

We don’t care if “the US” is cut out of the settlement process, but we won’t take it kindly if we, the actual Americans, are defrauded by “Chinese Elders”.  

You see, it looks suspiciously like theft and World Bank chicanery to me, and simply in terms of what would happen to the individual perpetrators of such a scheme, it seems extremely ill-advised to me. 

They may not care about anything but their delusional devotion to “money”— but as they wake up and realize that they will be signing their own death sentences if they attempt to pull this off, and that they will stand accused of worldwide, long-term commodity price-rigging and monopoly interest market control to boot, sobriety may set in.

The “Chinese Elders” pretending to be Filipinos and Indonesians are under demand to return the “trust” assets held “for” us in the Philippines and in the World Bank and in the Global Debt Facility.   

Imagine that?  That the actual owners and depositors should get back their own assets?  

We have all the records and receipts of what was done in our names. The rest of the world now knows what the deal is and how the crooks have misrepresented it. 

Yes, Virginia, things really are this screwed up and no, it can’t be fixed without a major overhaul—- whether you call the bankers involved “Chinese Elders” or not. 

Just remember that just as Marcos was never Filipino, “the US” has never been “America” either.  

That is American gold in the Philippines and at the World Bank, and we are the American Government.  We are the ones with the history, provenance and deposit receipts. 
Not “the US”. 

So even though the rogue elements of the US Military offered to sell our Farm to the Chinese it doesn’t matter, because our Farm was never theirs to sell, and our gold is our gold, too. 

Any problem the “Chinese Elders” have needs to be addressed to the Pope, the Queen, and the Lord Mayor—- and all our purloined assets need to be returned to us. 


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Thursday, July 2, 2020

Update on Court Matters for State Nationals/Citizens

By Anna Von Reitz

All those who are awake will be seeing some very odd things going on in the courts and with the nomenclature they are trying to use, and even with the way they are stating purported charges. 

For example:  

Court Orders signed by judges using names styled like this: 
John M CHAMBERS  or LISA S White

Charges brought by entities styled like this:  
State Of Florida or FLORIDA

Charges restated in ways that make no sense, like this: 
Fleeing of Justice  (instead of Fleeing from Justice)

Defendants addressed like this:  John Maynard Keynes, but with the number (2) in parenthesis, indicating that there are two Defendants present, albeit only one name. 

All these details are important, and all of them need to be severely questioned when and if you are snagged into dealing with these courts.  

"Just what is this Plaintiff entity doing business as "State Of Florida" styled in this manner?   I have never seen this entity before in my life and certainly have no contract with it or obligation to it."

"Why does this docket present one three-part Proper Name, yet indicate the presence of two Defendants?"  

"What does this charge --- "Fleeing of Justice" --- mean?  One could flee from justice or flee to justice, but fleeing "of" justice seems an impossibility, as it would mean "fleeing apart from justice" or "fleeing separate from justice" or "fleeing belonging to justice".  How is anyone supposed to answer a nonsensical charge?"  

And that is just for starters.  The very names of the courts are also being changed to amount to gibberish, for example: 
The STATE Court of Missouri The State Court of MISSOURIthe Superior Court for TENNESSEEetc., etc., etc., 

"Pardon me, your Honor, but I have never seen the name of any court styled in the way that this court is presenting itself, and it appears that the very name of the court is gibberish, a combination of English and Latin amounting to fraud. How do you answer for this anomaly ---on the record, please?" 

So, they are piling on a lot of new crappola and still trying to make their scheme work and are still trying to address false commercial claims made by the erring Municipal Government contractors. 

But their situation is getting more and more desperate and all their attempts to deceive people are more threadbare by the hour, as Americans are tuning up their brains and observational skills.  

There are always many "gurus" out there offering answers and selling their pet legal theories like so many pastries in a shop. Quite often the purveyors of these wares are well-intentioned and eager to test their latest theories --- on you and your case.
Let me stress the fact that if you have to deal with these courts at all, you should not (unknowingly) allow yourself to be a Test Case. 

And in no case should you dabble in such activities with Other Parties and then attempt to implicate me or my processes because you added them in as an afterthought.  That will get you nothing but Minus Brownie Points with me. 

Changing your political status is not a Magic Bullet and is not, generally speaking, retroactive with respect to charges brought by these foreign courts. 

There are two reasons for this, the first of which is simply that if you are already in trouble with these courts and you then change your political status, it may be interpreted as "self-serving" and as an attempt to "flee justice".  If applicable, this will have to be answered successfully before any other consideration.  

The second reason is that crimes that occur in one jurisdiction may or may not also apply in other jurisdictions.  Murder, for example, is murder.  Armed robbery is armed robbery.  No matter which jurisdiction you are in, these are crimes and they will be prosecuted as crimes. 

So in no case should you think of the change of political status as a "Get out of jail free card." 

And in no case should you ever imply that I am responsible for your actions taken in respect to any court case when you are "mixing and matching" bits and pieces from other sources. 

For example, I have long warned everyone against presenting "writs" of any kind in these courts, as they do not, generally speaking, apply to anything these courts entertain.  Writs belong to a different species of law.  

In particular, I have discouraged the use of Writs of Habeas Corpus for the following reasons: (1) Writs of Habeas have been suspended in Territorial Courts since 1863; (2) Writs of Habeas are allowed in Municipal Courts only to the extent that the parties are Federal Civil Service Employees or Federal Municipal Dependents owed "Equal Civil Rights" and as we have all learned, "Equal Civil Rights" are privileges that can be suspended at any time. 

Mr. Trump signed an Executive Order a few months ago declaring a "National Emergency" and suspending "Equal Civil Rights" --- including any right that Federal citizens have with respect to Writs of Habeas Corpus. 

So, if you know your butt from buttercups, you would not present a Territorial Court with a Writ of Habeas Corpus and you would not present a Municipal COURT with a Writ of Habeas Corpus at this time.  

Despite the above explanations being given to people, explicitly, just as I have given it to you above, there are still those who are insisting on trying to enter Writs of Habeas Corpus into Territorial and Municipal court cases---- even Writ Law from England published in the 1600's, which --- if it applied to anyone --- could only apply to (1) Englishmen and/or (2) British Territorial Citizens, except that the entire reason that Americans would present a Writ of Habeas to a Territorial Court in the first place, is that they are NOT British.  

And then, having made this obvious blunder, against my advice, these same people have the unmitigated gall to come back to me and complain when they are (rightly) rebuffed.  

In order to profit from anything I teach or recommend, you must take the time to learn and educate yourself about the logic and history of things, pay attention to what you are doing, and then, actually take my advice.  Follow my recommendations.  

Don't take someone else's advice, fall on your nose and look like a loon in court, and then think you are going to blame me for it.  Okay?  Everyone got that?  

Here for the record is the general protocol for an avowed and recorded American State National or State Citizen being addressed by one of these foreign courts.  

When you hear your name called, you stand up without going into the court arena that is separated from the public by a railing, and you ask the important question:  "Is the Defendant being called a corporation, or a corporate officer, or a living man (woman)?" 

This is the crucial question.  The court will not want to answer.  The judge will most likely answer with another question, like, "Why do you ask?" 

"Because before God, I am a living man (woman) and I do not belong in this court."  

And that is the coup de grace.  That is the entire issue.  If, in the unlikely event that proceedings continue and you are questioned more severely, you will want to know what kind of court is addressing you --- whether it is a Municipal COURT or a Territorial Court.  So ask. 

Most likely, they will have to admit that it is a Territorial Court, but regardless of the answer, you know how to respond. 

1. If it is a Municipal COURT, you answer that you are exempt from all Municipal duty and service and you claim your exemption found at Title 50, Section 7 (c) and (e) of the 2012 Edition of the Federal Code. 

2. If it is a Territorial Court, you answer that you are a Foreign Sovereign and you give them your mandatory Foreign Sovereign Immunity Notice, and you claim your exemption under the Supremacy Clause of Article VI of The Constitution of the United States of America and Amendment XI thereof, which provides that no American is subject to foreign law.  

That's it, whether a Municipal COURT or a Territorial Court, you have your answer ready and you have your proof in your handy-dandy file folder.  If there is ANY continued "offer" to contract presented to you at all, you look at the Clerk or the Prosecutor, and gently inquire, "May I ask the birthdate of the Defendant?"

The Clerk will rattle around and offer one of two dates --- what you would normally recognize as your birthday, and another date a few days or weeks later, that is completely unfamiliar to you.
If they offer the familiar birthday, they are trying to identify you as a Ward of the Federated State of State organization in the State where you were born, and you are in Territorial Court.  

If they offer the unfamiliar birthdate, they are trying to prosecute you as a commercial corporation under Municipal Law. 

In either case, the answer is the same.  "Your Honor, I have court admissible evidence in my hand of a crime committed against me while I was still a baby in my cradle.  My identity was stolen and I was impersonated and a foreign political status was unconscionably conferred upon me, an American civilian. Here's the proof." 

Wave the Birth Certificate at them, let them examine it --- if they dare. 

"Let the record show that as a living man (woman) I have a day of creation that nobody knows and no certain name, either."

"The Clerk has submitted the evidence that the Defendant has a birthday and is therefore an individual created under 1 USC 8 and is a Territorial Citizen." 


"The Clerk has submitted the evidence that the DEFENDANT has a birthdate (different from the normal birthday) and is therefore an individual corporation created under Municipal law." 

I have presented proof (the BC) that both these entities were created and attached to me without my conscious knowledge or permission when I was still a baby in my cradle.  I am in fact a living American, a non-combatant and peaceful civilian, who has been grossly presumed upon by my employees and subjected to unconscionable contracting processes.  

I owe no duty to this court, but this court has a duty to me to set me free from any presumption of obligation under any foreign law, and to return to me my assets and my freedom without debt or encumbrance."

Period.  The end. 

This is the course that I recommend when answering anything to these courts at any initial hearing at all. Cut to the chase.  Do not "entertain or encourage" any false suppositions.  

If the validity of your presentation is questioned at all, you may refer them to the State Assembly Recording Secretary to affirm your political status and also refer to the recorded evidence --- in particular, the 1779 Declaration.  

Thus you stand acquitted of any charge these courts can bring, though in a serious case, like murder charges, they will hold you and refer you for trial under our American Common Law, which is considerably more harsh in such cases than the Territorial or Municipal law. 

Why?  Because the Territorial and Municipal law both regard you as property, and keeping their property alive so as to profit from incarceration fees and taxes and other emoluments is often more attractive than putting an end to your criminality, whereas the Public, which is charged the expense for your incarceration has the opposite motivation, and a sincere desire to protect those who are not causing trouble from violent criminals. 

I often use the example of a drunk driver swerving off the road onto a sidewalk and hitting and killing an innocent pedestrian. 
Under American Common Law, you are facing capitol punishment and Murder One, because you had cause to know how drunk you were and you chose to drive anyway--- and the all-important point is that you killed someone.  

Under the foreign corporate forms of law, you are facing a host of lesser charges--- vehicular homicide, involuntary manslaughter, drunk driving, etc., etc., etc. --- and looking at jail time and fines and property losses.  Not the loss of your own life.  

So it pays to know where your bread is buttered and which form of law you are standing under and why.  And if you don't "get it" --- brother, sister --- it isn't my fault for trying to clue you in.  

Finally, I recommend that whenever you are mis-addressed, coerced, or presumed upon by any of your erstwhile public employees and certainly any time that your constitutional guarantees are challenged or violated in any way, that you produce a complaint and Witnessed Testimony in Lieu of an Affidavit and deliver it to the Office of the State Prosecutor. 
It's their duty to ride herd on the rest of the animals in this zoo and to defend your constitutional guarantees.  Call upon them to do so.  

And if all else should fail, take it to the United States State Department, because at the end of the day, mis-addressing and importuning an American civilian as if they were Territorial or Municipal persons, is a diplomatic issue requiring prompt action by the Secretary of State.  

If the Secretary of State does not provide remedy and relief, it goes higher. 

Pray God our system is never so broken that the Secretary of State doesn't know their duty and their job, and in the meantime, work like hamsters in a wheel to build your own State Assembly and get your own court officers elected, fill your jury pools, and set up your American Common Law Court for the civilian populace, so that Ex Parte Milligan, 71 US 2, kicks in, and there is no longer any excuse for these foreign courts to ever address you at all.  


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Wednesday, July 1, 2020


Found Here:

Life and Money and the Fourth of July

By Anna Von Reitz

Life and money are antithetical to each other, yet as my Mother often observed, they have made it hard to have one without the other.

The "they" involved are the purveyors of money as a commodity, because at the end of the day, that is what "money" is ---- a product like widgets, a symbol of value, condensed as a coin or a piece of paper or even as digits in a ledger--- a symbol of something unseen and indefinite, called "value".

That's why the use of money is an act of passive idolatry, seeming to agree that this "symbol" has the value of whatever the symbol may be translated to stand for. 

As handy as this is for purposes of trade, it is fundamentally whack-job and untrue, a circumstance that seeps into the fabric of our world in ways that undermine sanity and decency and logic, too. 

It occurred to someone some time ago, that if coins and pieces of paper could "stand for" value, then so could cards made of plastic, and digits in bank ledgers,  even though it costs nothing but the trivial labor of entering those digits in a bank ledger to create this supposed value. 

Watch this:  $989, 018, 766, 455, 869, 224, 659, 359, 779, 098, 555, 995. 09.

Wow.  And now, I own all that. It's mine.  I made it.  I created it.

And there are people crazy enough to believe that this has value, too.

Help us bring an end to all this madness.  Support your actual government.

If you think about it for five seconds you will know that what we are telling you is true.  You are responsible for self-governing, and when is the last time you did any such thing?  

Your Employees, like Mr. Trump, can't do your whole job for you.  There are some things you have to do for yourself. 

So, come on.  Get going.  Go to:

And do your part, if you can, to help financially support those of us who are already engaged in the process of Self-Governance.  Until everything gets sorted out, your Assemblies need money to provide services and make progress.

I am still the Chief Cook, Bottle-washer, and Paymaster for this Operation.
If you want peacekeeping forces in place, if you want sanity and justice restored, if you want your constitutional guarantees enforced--- make this Fourth of July count:

Donations by check or money order:  Anna Maria Riezinger
                                                            In care of: Box 520994
                                                            Big Lake, Alaska 99652


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

To Rodrigo Duterte, President of the Philippines

By Anna Von Reitz

There is a great deal of ignorance in the world today, President Duterte, and a great deal of dishonesty, too.

You have established a good reputation as a man with Common Sense and a love for Justice.

We pray that these merits of character will serve the world well in the present circumstance.

In 1898, the Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business "in our names" as "The United States of America, Inc." used our money to buy the land mass of the Philippine Islands from the then-government. 

While this is an outrageous circumstance that one group of heirs would offer the portions and inheritance of the rest of their generation and all generations to come after, this transaction did actually take place, and not only in the Philippines.  We have the receipts.

Shortly thereafter, the same Scottish Commercial Corporation began removing large quantities of American gold to the Philippines for storage and what the Perpetrators called "safe-keeping".

In 1934, the Successor and Secondary to this Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business in our names as "the United States of America, Inc." was also in bankruptcy reorganization.  They pushed through an Act of their Congress creating an "independent government for the Philippines" so that the new Philippine Government could act as the Trustee of the American Gold cashiered away in the Philippines for storage. 

We have the record of that whole series of transactions, too.

In World War II, the Japanese invaded the Philippines and found the American gold in storage, whereupon it was mis-named "Yamashita's Gold" when in fact it never belonged to Yamashita and didn't belong to the Philippines, either. 

The Japanese General Yamashita, however, seized upon our gold and transported it all over the world, and especially throughout the Pacific Rim. 

Gold, as you know, has a unique signature depending on its source. Despite desperate efforts to mix and smelt our American gold with gold from other sources by parties in Indonesia, it is still recognizably American gold.

We are still here,  the Lawful Government of The United States of America, claiming our assets back and taking exception to any presumption that we are being represented in this matter by an incorporated entity whatsoever.

President Duterte, we were innocent Third Parties in all of this.  All these deals done and actions taken in our names were never approved by us.  Our government of the people, by the people, and for the people has not been in Session for many years, and has only recently assembled.

Please be advised that ours is an unincorporated government, and in international jurisdiction, our affairs are conducted by our unincorporated Federation of States.  All incorporated entities doing business "in our names" are doing so without authority and are in fact infringing upon our Good Name and Trademarks in a criminal manner.

The Principals responsible for these abuses, the Pope, the Queen, and the Lord Mayor, as well as their Subcontractors operating as governmental services corporations, have been fully informed. 

Please take appropriate action to ensure that the Philippine Government does not fail its trust and is not hood-winked by these predatory commercial corporations, and not placed in the middle of any legal battle between us and our erstwhile business partners.

If you see the justice and logic of what we propose, we are happy to negotiate  the return of the Philippine land to the People of the Philippines, in consideration for the return of our gold. 

Thank you very much for your time and attention.


Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America


See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.