Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Friday, December 23, 2022

Merry Christmas to All "Licensed" Professionals and Businesses

 By Anna Von Reitz

A license by definition is official permission to engage in activities that would otherwise be illegal.  

Have you stopped to consider --- what is illegal about driving, owning a dog, conducting a business, providing health care services as a physician, nurse, dentist, pharmacist, or other health care professional, or acting as a Counselor of Law?  What is illegal about getting married???

It should be obvious to anyone who stops and thinks about it for five seconds that no such "licensing requirements" can apply to an American in a free country.  So what is going on here?  

Usurpation and obfuscation. 

And who are all these people running around carrying clip-boards and claiming that you "must" have a license or permits for activities that have never been subject to regulation since the founding of this country?  

The only things that any Federal Subcontractor, Agency, or Franchise has authority to regulate are: interstate sale, manufacture, or transport of alcohol, tobacco, and firearms, interstate commerce (defined as business between incorporated entities across state borders) -- and their own internal affairs and citizenry, that is, their own employees.

These people with the clip-boards and demands are all acting -- whether they know it or not, as "Federal citizenry", and Federal Citizens are the ones who have to be licensed and permitted and regulated.  They are the ones subject to "Administrative Law" ---statutes, ordinances, regulations, codes -- as opposed to Public Law, and for regulating their own business affairs and issuing permits and licenses among themselves, according to the Public Policies of the corporations that employ them. 

I have a friend here in Alaska who I dearly cherish, an old War Horse in this particular "War of Identities", and a new friend in the Cause who both spontaneously, within 24 hours of each other, brought forward this case citation: 

“The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.” [Emphasis added]
     W. W. Cargill Co. v. State of Minnesota, 180 U.S. 452 (1901)

Or, to put it another way, the rules, ordinances, statutes, codes, regulations and mandates governing any corporation, together with those Public Policies any corporation may impose on its employees or vendors providing services to the corporation and its employees, is still subject to the Public Law (in particular, the Constitution). 

Whether you are "licensed" or have a "permit" or not, you are never required to say or do anything in conflict with (or trespassing against) the guarantees owed to Americans.  

So, if Americans are owed the right to freedom of speech, for example, whether they are licensed or not, no corporation's internal administrative law can be invoked to censor them.  Or invade their privacy.  Or dictate 

Corporations, including the American Medical Association, and the American Bar Association, have to respect the Constitutional Guarantees owed to their American employees, vendors -- that is, licensees, customers, and agency subcontractors.  And no "licensee" can be forced as a condition of their licensing to violate any aspect of the Constitutions. 

Doctors?  Lawyers?  Police?  Code Compliance Officers of all kinds? CEO's of corporations large and small?  Are you listening? 

The Constitutions limit the activities of these foreign Federal Subcontractor corporations, aka, "persons" on our soil. And any licenses issued by these corporations to their separate citizenry (employees) or licensees (vendors) cannot be used to evade their limitations imposed by the Constitutions. 

You, acting as a Licensee (Vendor supplying services to them or for them) cannot be coerced in any manner to violate the Constitution by any licensing agreement or regulation.  

CEO's who impose on their employee's financial privacy and collect taxes from Americans under False Presumptions and who coerce their American employees to obey mask mandates, etc., are in violation of the Constitutions.  

And it's a far more serious offense to be in violation of the Constitutions than to be in violation of Public Policy.  And no Policy Maker can subourne you to violate the limitations of the Constitutions.  

Exercise your conscience with impunity and immunity.  

Mask mandates?  No can do. 
Coercion, threats of losing employment?  No can do. 
Threats of losing your license?  No can do. 

Threats of "investigations"?  No can do. 

Rat Watch Call Out to All Patriot Researchers - Big Move 1927

 By Anna Von Reitz

Folks, I know it's Christmas Week.  I know you don't have time now, except for a few of us graybeards, perhaps, but.... 

We have always known that something Big Happened in 1927, and we suspect that we know what it is, however, being able to prove it has been quite elusive. Unlike what happened with the Federal Reserve scheme, the Big Move in 1927 hasn't been exhaustively documented --yet. 

The First World War ended November 11, 1918, which was a catastrophe from the standpoint of the (largely) American war suppliers and contractors. It was an even bigger disaster for European "Defense Contractors", like Bayer and I.G. Farben and Krupp. 

They would have immediately begun folding their tents and counting up their losses due to cancelled orders, etc., and started to pull the plug on their Holding Corporations, getting ready to bankrupt them--- and throw their assets into peacetime production investments instead. 

Seven years later, 1925, the Internal Revenue Service came back ashore here in America, a sure sign that another round of collections to pay for war reparations was imminent. 

The Big Move in 1927 was obviously the settlement of the bankruptcy of the major "U.S.Government"  Holding Corporation that had been supplying all the war equipment, food, medical supplies, etc.,  in receivership to the Creditors.  But which one was it? 

This is, by the way, how you can win the war and lose anyway -- by allowing these corporations to abuse bankruptcy at the public expense. 

Unlike World War II, the main "American Group Supplier" didn't leave its fingerprints on everything from canteens and soup cans to guns in World War I.  Its identity is much more apocryphal and relies mainly on rare photos of personal equipment items--- for example:

So, what did "U.S." mean in WWI in terms of the Government Corporation(s) using these initials?  We would suspect, as always, the British Territorial United States family of commercial corporations, mainly British Crown Corporations--- but exactly which one? 

This unresolved puzzle piece has nagged at me for years, and it's important because the Big Move in 1927 set up the Bank Runs and the demolition of the stock market in 1929. 

We need to definitively identify this commercial corporation and its Creditors in order to nail down the history and provenance of the men whose Grandsons and Great-Grandsons are putting the world through a more modern version of the same debacle-for-profit now.  

A piece of satire came across my desk today, published by the venerable satire publication, The Onion, which relates to this specific time and mystery.  Reuter's, which has been owned by Rothschild since they moved into the same building together back in the 1880's, promptly debunked the "news" article as satire, but there are two funny things about it.  

Satire by its nature must be a commentary on life, on politics, on specific events and situations, and there has to be an element of truth in satire to make it stick. The Onion has a nasty habit of commenting on current events because of this. Chances are, where there is smoke, there is fire-- an underlying actual news story or event that The Onion is poking at.  

And secondly, Reuter's response was not only quick and dismissive, but it completely failed to address any underlying new story.  Normally, when and if the lofty Rothschild News Brand deigns to do a humble fact checking, they give you the entire history complete with a Cliff Notes edition and maps.  Not this time. 

So?  Have a few hours away from work, all you military history buffs?  Want to look at WWI equipment to see if you can spot the name of a "United States" or "United States of America" Corporation stamped on things?  Maybe muster rolls?  Medical forms?  

Want to go wade around in the New York Times archives and the Wall Street Journal archives for July-August-September of 1927? 

I can think of worse things to do, if you are sitting around alone on Christmas.  

Here's a list of interesting occurrences from 1927 to get your little gray cells moving: 

The year starts with the BBC being incorporated; the British Broadcasting Company receives a Royal Charter and becomes the British Broadcasting Corporation.  The Government now controls it and owns it. 

In February, "the United States" and Canada begin diplomatic relations--- but which "United States"?  And since when hasn't Canada had "diplomatic relations" with any version of the United States?  Were they finally settling the old grudge-match against the Municipal United States left over from the so-called American Civil War?  Canada would have been an Ally to the British Territorial Government and the Northern Confederation, against the Municipal United States which sided with the South. 
In March, this same zephyr, "the United States", refused to sign the League of Nations Treaty on Disarmament, and again the question--- which "United States"?  The incorporated Municipal Corporation doing business as "the United States" couldn't sign a land jurisdiction Treaty, and wouldn't want to, anyway. The actual Municipal Government couldn't sign a land treaty, either, because they don't actually own the District of Columbia nor the ground the Municipality sits on.  

In April, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was renamed "the" United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland --- another incorporation and name change, indicating that the roll-up to create "the" incorporated UK has started.

In May, in America, the U.S. Supreme Court allows forced sterilization of "unfit" persons in Buck v Bell, which again shows a connection between the Eugenists and the word "Buck" --- Buckingham, The Buck Act, and Buck v Bell, are all infamous and have double meanings, related to another famous word ending in "uck". 

In July, also in America, the FDA was established as "the Food, Drug, and Insecticide Administration" --- FDIA. 

Now, doesn't that clear things up about the true nature of the FDA? --though how they imagined that they had any granted authority to regulate anything beyond alcohol, tobacco, and firearms remains a mystery.   

In September, the fifth, Paul Volcker, past Federal Reserve Chairman, was born as Paul Vocker; why the name change?  And the pen name Paul Volker, too?   

Also in September. CBS incorporates and the network goes on the air with 47 radio stations. 

Finally, and also in September, the League of Nations Slavery Commission signed the Treaty outlawing all forms of slavery worldwide. 

The League of Nations was formed as part of the Treaty of Versailles ending World War I and functioned from January 20, 1920 to April 19, 1946; it was reportedly disbanded for its failure to prevent WWII, but in actuality, it ceased functioning because its members were land jurisdiction governments, not corporations, and the corporations in the form of the British Territorial Government/British Crown/and American Mercenary Forces, were preparing to occupy most of the world--- purportedly to protect the land jurisdiction governments they were and still are usurping upon and supplanting. 

In October, construction of Mount Rushmore started, and this inexplicable monument, complete with four giant idols of Washington, Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Teddy Roosevelt, continued under construction until 1941.  Ask yourselves--- why?  And what did these four men have in common?  All four sold us out to the British. Jefferson was the only one who was blackmailed.  The other three did it for land and money. 

Well, at least the British Crime Lords were grateful.  

In December, Iraq gained its freedom from Great Britain, but, curiously, the British garrisons remained, indicating that Iraq's freedom was in name only, and that the British Territorial Government aka The Raj, continued to occupy the country behind a storefront popular government. 

The Big Move in 1927 saw the beginning of buying up, expanding, and overtly controlling the media, the foundations being laid for the UK, the expansion of the British Raj occupation in the Mideast, the attempt by the League of Nations to outlaw slavery -- which probably caused its own demise twenty years later, because we can see what has happened ever since: the Defense Contractors and entities that traditionally made their money on slave sales and slave labor combined forces. 

And they have been plundering, murdering, stealing, enslaving, lying, and constructing their criminal matrix of corporate interlocking trust directorates and monopolies and intelligence agencies ever since. 

Help expose and put an end to this horror story. Dig, dig, dig.... and report back, please.    


See this article and over 3900 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Loy Brunson EXPLAINS His Historic Supreme Court Case!