Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Local officials step outside the law AGAIN!


When will these idiot local government officials ever learn that they took an oath to defend the US Constitution?

Here again we have stupid government goons proposing unlawful means and fulfilling the very definition of ignorance, "Not knowing what is required by one's station in life".
City Proposes Disarming Citizens in the Event of a Disaster
People like this need to be brought to answer for their crimes. The very fact that they are proposing this is prima facia evidence of a crime of breaking their oath of office and official misconduct, a misdemeanor crime.

When are the people going to start making some arrests. The minute they made the proposal officially in the council chambers they should have been arrested and charged with their crime.

These local government officials are trying to unlawfully bypass the 2nd amendment, part of the Constitution they swore to uphold and protect "so help them God" and therefore have become the very DOMESTIC ENEMIES the Declaration warns about.


I would pity any city council or county commission who tried this in Montana.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Ted Nugent tears the gun grabbers up - again!

This article in WND by Ted Nugent really gets the job done.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/the-redcoats-are-here-but-not-to-worry/


Here is my comment at his blog:
One important thing you left out Ted. All these gun grabbers are OUTLAWS. If they were not outside the law with their attempt to get the guns, they would be proposing an outright repeal of the 2nd amendment following the constitutional amendment process. They will not obey the US Constitution, and they know such a repeal attempt would fail, so they are going OUTSIDE THE LAW to try by statute or executive order to create a monopoly of lethal force in their own hands. That, my friend, makes them the outlaws and seditionists, let alone traitors and oath-breakers, both of which are felony crimes. Oh, and there is one more thing. Because they are willing to incite violence against peace loving and law abiding residents of America, that makes them TERRORISTS! They are terrorizing over 100 million firearms owners with violent confiscation of their only means of defense and the means to defend the very constitution these oath-breakers swore an oath before God and men to uphold. THE REAL TERRORISTS ARE IN GOVERNMENT AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN. 
Governments have killed over 170 million of their own countrymen just in the 20th century alone. These monsters are criminals and terrorists, and I thought we were supposed to be fighting a war against terrorists. THEY HAVE DECLARED WAR AGAINST THE LAW ABIDING PEOPLE OF AMERICA. They need to be arrested the instant they throw their so called bills in the hopper, charged with their crimes, made to stand trial on national television, and then if convicted, made to suffer the constitutional penalty for their crimes.
The only realistic answer and solution I have heard is the one put forward by this nation's leading expert on the US Constitution, Dr. Edwin Vieira Jr. called "The Sword and Sovereignty". It's available from Amazon.com
http://www.paulstramer.net/201...

Firearms Company boycotts the gun grabbing government

Olympic Arms refuses to do business with New York.

All the gun makers should do the same as this company. This would put a quick stop to the gun grabbers. All ammo manufacturers should also do this. The gun grabbers would have to go home.


Olympic Arms is a staunch believer in and defender of the Constitution of the United States, and with special attention paid to the Bill of Rights that succinctly enumerates the security of our Divinely given Rights. One of those Rights is that to Keep and Bear Arms.
Legislation recently passed in the State of  outlaws the AR15 and many other firearms, and will make it illegal for the good and free citizens of New York to own a large selection of legal and safe firearms and magazines. We feel as though the passage of this legislation exceeds the authority granted to the government of New York by its citizens, and violates the Constitution of the United States, ignoring such SCOTUS rulings as District of Columbia v. Heller – 554, U.S. 570 of 2008, McDonald v. Chicago – 561 U.S. 3025 of 2010, and specifically the case of United States v. Miller – 307 U.S. 174 of 1939.
Due the passing of this legislation, Olympic Arms would like to announce that the State of New York, any Law Enforcement Departments, Law Enforcement Officers, First Responders within the State of New York, or any New York State government entity or employee of such an entity – will no longer be served as customers.

Read more: 
http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/13/olympic-arms-inc-announces-new-york-state-sales-policy-will-no-longer-serve-first-responders/#ixzz2Kpw6AUO8

When they come for you and your guns, what will you do?

This article came from one of our readers this morning, and it's great to see people taking a stand for the US Constitution, but I am forced to make some comments on some of his points that if not made could lead to some misunderstanding about what the law really is for the United States. Many believe the we have "Constitutional Rights".  We don't. We have God given rights under positive divine law, and under the natural law, THAT NO GOVERNMENT EVER CAN TAKE AWAY, because no government ever gave those rights. They were not ever within the authority of government to give or take away. He is absolutely right that the US Constitution is still in full force and effect, and we will point out how that has been reinforced by supreme court rulings very recently.
My comments will appear below in blue inside parentheses. 
Subject: FW: If They Come for Your Guns?  Worth the time to read!
If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?
This man has put down on paper what many people are thinking but are too cautious to express openly. 
I hope it never comes to what he is advocating but I can certainly see where the possibility exists.
God help us all if it ever does happen.
 
PS  : Here is what Wikipedia has to say about the author:
Dean Garrison (born 1955) is a contemporary American author and crime fiction novelist. He was born in Michigan , grew up in the Indiana , Illinois , and Texas , and received his B.A. degree from Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan . Garrison is a Crime Scene Technician in West Michigan . His research in the fields of crime scene investigation and Shooting Reconstruction are widely published in forensic journals under the name "D.H. Garrison, Jr." 
Subject: If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?
I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us.(When government steps outside of the supreme law, the US Constitution, they forfeit their authority. Therefore they are not then legitimate government at all and become the outlaws and illegitimate, requiring no obedience. Let's keep in mind who the real law breakers are in all of this. For more on what the law really is: http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/11/what-is-really-law-and-what-is-not-law.html ) 
I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I dont think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with those rights. (Again, we don't have Constitutional rights. We the People WROTE the Constitution for government to follow, not the other way around. We have God given rights which no government, legitimate or otherwise, can take away. The enemies of freedom want you to believe that government gives rights, and they talk about "constitutional rights" all the time. Even the gun grabbers want to retain their own "constitutional right" to bear arms, but they want to deny yours.)
About a month ago I let the democracy word slip in a discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been conditioned to use this term. Its not an accurate term and it never has been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is similar to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans want something that goes against our founding principles, they have no right to call for a violation of constitutional rights.  (Lest anyone think that Constitution is no longer in full force and effect I point to the Mack/Printz decision on the brady bill and States Rights. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1478.ZO.html) 
If you are religious you might choose to think of it this way Say that members of your congregation decide that mass fornication is a good thing. Do they have the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. It doesnt matter how many people try to stray from it. Did I just compare our founders to God? In a way I did, but please note that I am not trying to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. It is the law. It is indisputable. (This is a question of "Who is the law giver"? We know that the author of a law is the law giver as God is the author of the Ten Commandments, and the Natural laws. It follows then, that the author of the US Constitution is the law giver. Look at the preamble. It says " We the People do ordain and establish..... We the People are the authority who established these rules for government servants to follow, and we limited those powers government could exercise, delegated from our God given natural rights and powers, without which government has no power at all, except in our day they have USURPED much power illegitimately and unlawfully that doesn't belong to them at all. They have become the outlaws, and usurpers.)

Our founders did not want a democracy for they feared a true democracy was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and balances was set up to help limit corruption of government and also the potential for an immoral majority developing within the American People. We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution.
(We are ruled ultimately by positive divine law (ten commandments) and the natural laws put into spin at the beginning by our creator, which laws are all higher than any man made law such as the US Constitution, but it is true to say that man made Constitution is the Supreme Law for the United States, a creation also of man.)
Why is a democracy potentially just as dangerous as a monarchy? Lets look at something that Benjamin Franklin said because it answers that question more fully and succinctly than I can.
 
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin 
Even 230+ years ago our founders were perceptive enough to realize that democracy was a dangerous form of government. How so? Because the citizens of a country can become just as corrupt as any government. We have seen evidence of this throughout history. Ask Native Americans and African-Americans if this population can become corrupt.

I think in 2012 we are seeing evidence of what Franklin was trying to tell us. Just because a majority of people may support certain ideas it does not mean that those ideas are just. In simple terms, just because most Americans love our president and voted for him, it does not mean that he has the power to go against our constitutional rights.
(In fact the supreme law would have never allowed that man to even run for the office, but then the outlaws in government welcomed him and it was all outside the law that he was installed) 
Next Id like to review the text of the second amendment. It is very clear. This is the law of this land. So when Senator Feinstein or President Obama talk about taking your guns, you need to think about something. Are they honoring their sworn oath to uphold the constitution?
 
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State , the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
This is a pretty clear statement. The fact is that it took 232 years for the Supreme Court to even rule on this amendment because it has never been successfully challenged. In 2008 a case of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that a handgun ban in Washington D.C. was unconstitutional. One also has to take this into consideration. The Supreme Court supports your right to own guns. If you want to research this decision further you can start here. (According to the foremost Constitutional scholar of our day, Dr. Edwin Vieira Jr. the Heller decision greatly REDUCED our gun rights from what the founders had. Get his 2300 page work on that called "The Sword and Sovereignty" here: 
http://www.amazon.com/The-Sword-Sovereignty-Constitutional-Principles/dp/0967175941/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1360618487&sr=8-1-fkmr1&keywords=Dr.%2BEdwin%2BVieira%2Bsword
For those who try to debate the spirit of the 2nd amendment, they are truly no different from people who will try to take Biblical quotes out of context to try to support their immoral decisions. The founders were very clear on the intent of the 2nd amendment. Let me share a few quick quotes here:
 
The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. -Thomas Jefferson

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American peoples liberty teeth and keystone under independence From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference they deserve a place of honor with all that is good. -George Washington

The Constitution shall never be construed.to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms. -Samuel Adams
I could find hundreds of quotes like these. This country was built on the right to bear arms. It was built on the rights of an individual to bear arms, regardless of what his government or neighbor happened to think. This is crystal clear. Ironically the people who voice their opinions against this right have their free speech protected by your guns. Without guns in this country, all other amendments become null and void, simply because We the People will lose our power of enforcement.
We need to keep this in mind as our representatives try to push gun bans. I dont care if 99% of people are in support of gun bans (which is far from the case), it is a violation of our constitutional rights, plain and simple.

A constitutional republic protects the rights of the individual even when their ideas are very much  in the minority. If I were the only person in America who believed in the 2nd amendment, I would still be within my rights to call upon it. You would all think I was insane and possibly celebrate if I was gunned down, but in the end I would be the only true American among us.

Our framers were very clear on this. If my government comes to take my guns, they are violating one of my constitutional rights that is covered by the 2nd amendment.
I(What is constitutional is the 2nd amendment in it's entirety. Everyone forgets that most important part. "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state......   We have NOT done our part to keep this amendment.  Do you want to stand alone? Not me. I would rather be a part of the Lawful Militia of the Several States! I will stand alone if I have to, but would rather have hundreds of patriots helping under the authority of our County Sheriff the way it is supposed to work.) t is not my right, at that point, but my responsibility to respond in the name of liberty.tried to avoid putting into print, but I am going to say it. The time for speaking in code is over.
If they come for our guns then it is our constitutional right to put them six feet under. You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries to tread on your liberty. I am thinking about self-defense and not talking about inciting a revolution. Re-read Jefferson s quote. He talks about a last resort. I am not trying to start a Revolt, I am talking about self-defense. If the day for Revolution comes, when no peaceful options exist, we may have to talk about that as well. None of us wants to think about that, but please understand that a majority cannot take away your rights as an American citizen. Only you can choose to give up your rights. (The proper attitude is a bit different. I am NOT saying we don't have the absolute right to defend our own lives and those of our families and neighbors, but to stop a tyrannical government MUST be done properly with the mechanism that is required and was required. That mechanism is the MILITIA. There is no other way to be successful. People standing alone will never win this!)
Congress could pass gun ban legislation by a 90%+ margin and it just would not matter. I think some people are very unclear on this. This is the reason we have a Supreme Court, and though I do not doubt that the Supreme Court can also become corrupt, in 2008 they got it right. They supported the constitution. It does not matter what the majority supports because America is not a democracy. A constitutional republic protects the rights of every single citizen, no matter what their elected servants say. A majority in America only matters when the constitution is not in play. (What he says here is right but doesn't go far enough. The Supreme court can't make a ruling today that changes what the founders believed and what We the People delegated to the federal government. They just think they can. In practice it comes down to enforcement. At the local level the power still rests with the people. Read the Mack/Printz decision. The supreme court says the federal government can't tell the sheriff what to do, Period. The Heller decision was a truncation of our real instruction to government NEVER to interfere with our gun rights, IN THE MILITIA. We have abrogated our duty to ourselves and the law by letting the Militia of the Several States to fall into disuse.)

I just wrote what every believer in the constitution wants to say, and what every constitutional blogger needs to write. The truth of the matter is that this type of speech is viewed as dangerous and radical or subversive, and it could gain me a world of trouble that I do not want. It is also the truth. To make myself clear I will tell you again. If they come for your guns it is your right to use those guns against them and to kill them. You are protected by our constitution. (Who are the real subversives, and the real seditionists? Those who would pervert the law! Read the definition of those two words. Subversion is "a systematic attempt to overthrow or undermine a government by persons working secretly from within" and Sedition is "inciting violent overthrow of the lawful civil authority".  Now I ask you, are not people who are working for gun control trying to overthrow the government We the People put in place by the Constitution? Are not those same people willing to create violence to get what they want? Then ask yourselves what is the penalty for these high crimes?)
Most of the articles I am reading on the subject are trying to give you clues without just coming out and saying it. I understand that because certain things in this country will get you on a list that you dont want to be on. I may well be on that list. This blog is small and growing so I may not be there yet, but I have dreams. I also have my own list of subversives and anyone who attempts to deny my constitutional rights is on that list.

I am not the subversive here, it is the political representatives who are threatening to take away my inalienable rights. If they come to take my guns and I leave a few of them wounded or dead, and I somehow survive, I have zero doubt that I will spend a long time in prison and may face an execution. But I would much rather be a political prisoner than a slave.

If I go down fighting then I was not fighting to harm these human beings. I was simply defending my liberty and yours. It is self-defense and it is what our country was built on. We won our freedom in self-defense. We would not be ruled by a tyrannical government in the 1770s and we will not be ruled in 2012 by a tyrannical government. There is no difference.

This is a case of right and wrong. As of now the 2nd amendment stands. It has never been repealed. If Feinstein or Barack have a problem with the constitution then they should be removed from office. They are not defending the constitution which they have sworn an oath to protect. It is treasonous to say the least. They would likely say the same about me, but I have the constitution, the founders, and the supreme court on my side. They only have their inflated egos. (They have one more thing, military might, and to counteract that we need the over 100 million gun owners to come together in the Militia of the Several States. Just the fact that we do will stop these gun grabbers cold in their tracks because they really are all COWARDS, who would never go out in public without their ARMED SECURITY, armed with the very same guns they want to take away from law abiding and peace loving people all over this country.)

I am not writing this to incite people. I am writing this in hopes that somehow I can make a tiny difference. I have no idea how many of my neighbors have the will to defend their constitutional rights. 2%? 20%? I am afraid that 20% is a high number, unfortunately. When push comes to shove many people may give up and submit to being ruled. I believe that our government is banking on this.

What I do know is that this country was founded by people who had balls the size of Texas and Patriotic Americans take shit off of no one, especially our own government. For evidence of that, you might research the Revolutionary War. My question is how many Patriots are left? (I offer the current gun sales as an indicator of the number of real patriots. They are NOT buying them to just hand them to the feds! They have drawn the line in the sand and will not be conned once more into letting the OUTLAWS run over them. This is NOT a society getting ready for hunting. They are getting ready for WAR! They won't start it, but might be forced to finish it quickly and get back to the peace they love. I hope we can avoid that "last resort" but at this point I wouldn't bet money that we can.) 
I would hope that our officials come to realize that, regardless of our numbers, we still exist because they are calling Patriotic Americans to action. They are making us decide if we want to die free or submit to their rule. I cannot tell you where you should stand on that. I do know that it may make the difference between living a life of freedom or slavery. (I would say that the choice is not between dying or submitting. It is a choice between forming up the proper defense with the will to use it, and giving away our freedom with it's attendant results for us and our children. I for one will not be getting on their helicopter or bus to go to any camp. But before that I will exhaust every other option. Read my article on that here: http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/09/when-is-it-time-to-fight.html 
You must start thinking about this because I believe that the day is coming soon and I personally believe it has already been planned. Not all conspiracy theories are hogwash. They may throw down the gauntlet soon and my suggestion is that you prepare yourself to react.
I mean no disrespect to our elected officials but they need to understand that We the People will not be disarmed. If they proceed then it is they that are provoking us and we will act accordingly. We are within our rights to do so.

For those who are in support of taking the guns, you need to ask yourself a very important question, and I am not just talking about the politicians, because if you support them, you have chosen your side.

Are you willing to die to take my guns?

---------------------------------

Through regulations, taxation, inflation of the money supply, trade restrictions, and tethers on private associations, government itself is nothing but a massive drain on prosperity. The situation has become deeply dangerous for the future of freedom in America, with young people unable to find jobs, opportunities being destroyed in sector after sector, banks and corporations living on the dole, and so many regulations that we are living under something nearly as egregious as Soviet-style central planning.
 
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him --- better take a closer look at the American Indian."  Henry Ford

(In conclusion I must add that We the People are the law abiding, peace loving residents of these United States and we uphold the true law. We have a duty to enforce that law because we are the lawful civil authority with our duly elected Sheriff. Anybody who purports to pass any so called "law" that abrogates any of the protected God given rights outlined in that supreme law are the real OUTLAWS, Seditionists, Subversives, and Traitors, in other words they have become the DOMESTIC ENEMIES their own oath talks about! They are willing to destroy peace and good order in our communities to get what they want, which is a total monopoly on the use of lethal force, after which they will instigate a totalitarian police state and start the systematic murder of millions of us that abide by the supreme law, and believe in peace and freedom, and liberty under the TRUE AND HIGHEST LAW which is God's divine and positive law and the natural law He put in place and by which He governs the universe! Stand with God and He will stand FOR you. Remember they can't do anything to you that Almighty God does not allow for His own good and greater Glory and the Salvation of Souls including your own.)

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2013 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Incredible Speech on Gun Violence

Henson Ong - Legal Immigrant's speech on 2nd Amendment 
Gun Violence Prevention Working Group Public Hearing - Hartford, CT - 1/28/2013



This guy gets it right when most American born liberals get it exactly wrong.


Psychiatrist from Chicago says all Leftists are mentally ill

Liberal Mind,  The Psychological Causes of Political Madness

This book answers a lot of questions about why the leftists are the way they are, drunk on power, consumed with greed, completely disregarding logic, or the laws of the land.
I don't often read the work of psychotherapists, but this book review caught my attention.
Personally I have suspected that there is more to this story than a psychiatrist could diagnose.
I think some of these people have sold their very souls to the devil for what they can get from this world.
If the entire truth could be proved I  imagine we would find that some of them are entirely possessed by Satan himself, and need an exorcist far more than any psychiatrist.
But this book could help expose these people for the evil threat they really pose to mankind.
Paul




Psychiatrist: Leftists are mentally ill
- $4.95 today only!
'Strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions' cited by clinical psychotherapist
With Nancy Pelosi repeatedly telling audiences about hearing voices of deceased women, and Barack Obama regarded by many as dangerously narcissistic, here comes a veteran psychiatrist making the case that the mental-emotional world of leftists is actually tantamount to a mental disorder.


For more than 40 years, Rossiter has diagnosed and treated over 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases, both state and federal, as a  forensic psychiatrist retained by numerous public offices, courts and private attorneys. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

Rossiter explains with great clarity why the kind of liberalism displayed by Barack Obama during his presidency can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Rossiter. "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and overtaxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do."

Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

  • creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
  • satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
  • augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
  • rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

"The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

http://email.wnd.com/HS?a=ENX7CqhQ7I8z8SA9MKJT93nnGHxKLsm8OfcStGb5lw8W0bBhOG5mpqVsje_Hhe-ud1J8

Monday, February 11, 2013

The Militia of the Several States

Oops : There is that terrible M word again.  The domestic enemies of our Supreme Law of the Land, the US Constitution, want you to believe that that dirty Militia is going to be responsible for other words they want you to believe are very bad, like "civil unrest", and "insurgency:".  Well one man's insurgent is another man's freedom fighter. To King George all the Americans of his day were "insurgents".  They want you to believe that to oppose their gun control so called "laws" is the next thing to treason, and that to talk about the US Constitution is the next thing to "overthrowing" the government. They will brand those who want law and order and peace in our communities, and want everyone to obey that supreme law, as old fashioned, out of date, narrow minded, behind the times, and many other stupid twisted backwards terms that they themselves have invented to demonize real American Patriots of our day, just like they did during the time of the founders. They have many mouth organs of hate like the Southern Poverty Law Center just to name one, who are only too glad to do their bidding, and get rich in the process. Yes they are willing to sell their soul to the devil to get what they want, and have, over and over.

It seems the freedom loving people in America can't find any progress in really taking back the power that the US Constitution is supposed to protect in their hands. There are many reasons for this, not the least of which is the lack of morality among many. In other words Americans, first and foremost, MUST MAKE THEMSELVES WORTHY OF THE BLESSINGS OF FREEDOM, BEFORE we can expect our Creator to bless us with it. It seems in our day that the majority of us have made ourselves unworthy of those blessings with the plunge into immorality, and hedonism our country has experienced in the last 6 or 7 decades. So the very first requirement is for us to "Get our own house in order", or as my mother used to say, "Clean up your own doorstep first before you criticize your neighbor."  I know many of you have really given that some serious effort, but too many have not. Let's assume for the sake of the rest of this article, that we are talking to people who are absolutely sincere about making our country once again WORTHY of  freedom with that spiritual revival.

Once that is behind us, then what?  What is next? How can we get the power back into the hands of those who are really trying to be good and just, and peaceful? In short, how can we RESTORE AMERICA to her former peace and freedom under God's laws that is mentioned by our Founders, and avoid massive bloodshed in the process?  I am sure that question has been on everyone's mind, especially those who are somewhat well informed but feel powerless to stop the evil people who don't give a damn about the supreme law and are willing to destroy the peace and good order of our communities to get the absolute monopoly of lethal force that they want through their unlawful gun control measures.

Well we have been given the answer. 
The answer is contained in one definitive work by one of the most well studied, articulate, brilliant legal minds in the history of our country. His work will restore our country if it's followed properly.

Here is a short description of that work:

The Sword and Sovereignty: The Constitutional Principles of "the Militia of the several States" is a comprehensive study-2,304 pages in length, with 6,544 footnotes and endnotes-of the constitutional and statutory history of America's Militia, which gives special emphasis to the unique and indispensable rĂ´le of the Militia as the institutions through which WE THE PEOPLE themselves ultimately provide, or withhold, "the consent of the governed" upon which this country's form of government depends for its legitimacy. The Sword and Sovereignty derives the basic legal and practical principles of the Militia from a detailed study of the pre-constitutional Militia statutes of Rhode Island and Virginia (selected, for reasons the book makes clear, as exemplars of what happened throughout America in that era). It explains how these principles are embodied in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and how they should be applied in the operation of America's true "federal" system of government-indeed, why it is Congress's and every State's duty to see to the organization of, and every American's personal duty to participate in, the Militia, more imperatively now than ever before. It exposes the dangerous fallacy in the contemporary "individual-rights" misinterpretation of the Second Amendment, and explains how the Supreme Court's Heller decision reduced Americans' "right * * * to keep and bear Arms" to a level far below what their forebears enjoyed when the Constitution and Bill of Rights were ratified. And it examines ways in which revitalized "Militia of the several States" could, should, and if they were properly revitalized would deal with many of the most pressing contemporary problems this country faces-such as the correction of rogue public officials; the supervision of the "military-industrial complex"; the conduct of honest elections; the provision of an alternative currency, etc.

Here is where you can get this wonderful work on CD. 
ONCE YOU HAVE READ IT YOU CAN'T UNLEARN IT.
This will so impress you that you will want to seek your friends' help in implementing it immediately.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Sword-Sovereignty-Constitutional-Principles/dp/0967175941/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1360618487&sr=8-1-fkmr1&keywords=Dr.%2BEdwin%2BVieira%2Bsword

http://www.paulstramer.net/2013/02/dr-edwin-vieira-jr-on-news-with-views.html

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2013/02/11/nelson-hultberg-revitalization-of-the-state-militias/

DHS and DOD are conducting desensitizing exercises all across the U.S.

INVASION : DHS Source Tells Why the Military Train in US Cities.


"I spoke with a high-ranking, military source in DHS.   Preferring to remain unnamed for obvious reasons, he told me, “DHS and DOD are conducting desensitizing exercises all across the U.S.,” he paused, then added, “we’re being prepared for mass civil unrest in major U.S. cities.  DOD will be expected to help – when we’re requested.”
I asked if there was a timeline for expecting civil unrest in our cities and why should we expect it to begin with.  I was told that there were many reasons, but that the continued devaluation of our currency, the predicted history-setting prices for gasoline this summer and the continued gun control debate are forming a perfect storm of civil discontent.  When this storm hits, it will most assuredly produce mass casualties.  When does DHS expect this to happen?  This summer.
See the entire article here:

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Hypocrite "Catholic Pope" won't defend this Bishop


February 15, 2013 - Ferial Day
Bishop Williamson Faces a Fourth Trial in Germany for "Holocaust Denial"
He Refuses to Pay the Fine, but Instead Appeals Again



Traditional Catholic Bishop Richard Williamson Pauses in Meditation under a Crucifix

As the German Government Continues to Persecute Him for Exercising His Free Speech
The Hypocritical Benedict-Ratzinger, Who Defends Others' "Rights of the Human Person"
Has Not Said One Word in Defense of Williamson's Free Speech
Yet Williamson's Persistence Seems to Be Winning Out
And Embarrassing the Liberalist Government of Angela Merkel

The right of free speech that Benedict-Ratzinger proclaims as a Vatican II "right of the human person" is once again being assailed as traditional Catholic bishop Richard Williamson faces yet a fourth trial in Ratzinger's Germany on charges of "holocaust denial." And Ratzinger, the great Modernist, has raised not one word in defense of Williamson's human rights. Ratzinger wouldn't even go as far as the atheist philosopher Voltaire, who proclaimed: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

In his Bulletin of February 9, 2013, Williamson explained that he was first tried in 2010. It was a kangaroo trial, as the Regensburg judge rendered her verdict within a few minutes in a multipage document that could hardly have been written in that time. It was at the time reported in the German press that the German Chancelloress, Angela Merkel, had personally orchestrated the guilty verdict. Williamson hadn't even denied the World War II "holocaust," but simply questioned a point of detail on the controverted issue as a very small part of an interview for Swedish Public Television.

In a second trial, a higher court in Nuremberg overturned the verdict on appeal and required the state to pay all of Williamson's legal expenses. But in a third trial, the local Regensburg judge, the district where Benedict-Ratzinger has his home, again convicted Williamson on January 16, 2013. Friends of Bishop Williamson have offered to pay his fine, now reduced to 2,400 U.S. dollars, but Williamson would not capitulate to the corrupt verdict because "much more than just money is at stake." He has appealed again for a fourth trial, quoting Our Lord's powerful words: "For this was I born, and for this came I into the world; that I should give testimony to the truth" (John 18:37/DRV).

What else could a true Catholic bishop do?

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Bloody hands: The Southern Poverty Law Center


Long before homosexual activist Floyd Corkins entered the D.C.-based Family Research Council (FRC) with the intent to commit mass murder, I warned from the rooftops that the hard-left Southern Poverty Law Center’s anti-Christian “hate group” propaganda might spur such bloodshed. With a column headlined, “Liberal violence rising,” I wrote, “The SPLC’s dangerous and irresponsible (‘hate group’) disinformation campaign can embolden and give license to like-minded, though less stable, left-wing extremists, creating a climate of true hate. Such a climate is ripe for violence.”
Tragically, my deepest fears were realized.

Read more at 

http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/bloody-hands-the-southern-poverty-law-center/#at36G86Ls0Jkyt7C.99 

Krauthammer gets it backwards again!


Krauthammer: If You Take Up Arms Against The United States You Have Forfeited Your Rights

This appeared on the blog at 
http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/2013/02/krauthammer-if-you-take-up-arms-against-the-united-states-you-have-forfeited-your-rights/

Here is my comment: 

What about government agents that "take up arms" to enforce laws that abrogate the supreme law for the United States, which is the US Constitution?
Read what the supreme court has to say about such laws.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
So all the so called "laws" the gun grabbers purport to make ARE NOT LAW AT ALL. That makes the agents that suppose to enforce those laws the real OUTLAWS that Krauthammer should be saying have forfeited there rights. Not only that, but it makes them criminals and seditionists who are guilty of inciting violence against the lawful civil authority of We the People embodied in our Sheriffs and ourselves. These gun grabbers are not content to leave us in peace, to live and work and raise our families and they won't be satisfied until they have an absolute monopoly of lethal force in their own hands. That makes them traitors the very minute it turns bloody by their attacks against law abiding and peaceful people all around the country. These criminals are making an end run around the supreme law because they know that an outright repeal of the 2nd amendment would not fly and they are bound and determined to do whatever they have to. That means they are willing to incite violence against law abiding and peaceful people and are willing to destroy peace and good order in our communities to get their monopoly of force. THEY ARE THE OUTLAWS, THEY ARE THE CRIMINALS, THEY ARE THE SEDITIONISTS, THEY ARE THE TRAITORS. We have an absolute right to defend not only our own lives and those of our neighbors, but we have that same right to preserve the peace and the LAW, which is supremely embodied in the US Constitution which was written (ordained and established) for GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW, not the other way around.
But Krauthammer would never tell you that on Fox or anywhere else that it would make a difference. That makes him a person giving aid and comfort to the enemies of peace and freedom and the LAW. He is saying that the peaceful people who take up arms in their own defense against these outlaws are the problem. NO - THEY ARE THE SOLUTION, just like they were during the founder's days
.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Disarm the police, not the citizens

This is NOT the USSR, and crime is decreasing, so tell me why these vehicles are needed by police.


TAMPA, February 7, 2013 ― First, the good news. The five-year-old boy kidnapped by a deranged man in Alabama has been rescued unharmed. He is with his family and reportedly “seems to be acting normally.”
The bad news is that some media seem to be using this incident to justify the ongoing militarization of domestic police forces.
“Military tactics, equipment helped authorities end Alabama hostage standoff,” reads today’s Fox News headline. The article describes how law enforcement responded to the hostage situation with what has become the new normal in the former land of the free. They mobilized paramilitary forces to deal with the situation just as an occupying army would deal with “counterinsurgency.”
According to the article, “In many ways, the scene resembled more of a wartime situation than a domestic crime scene as civilian law enforcement relied heavily on military tactics and equipment to end the six-day ordeal.”


Read more: 

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/reawakening-liberty/2013/feb/7/disarm-police-not-citizens/#ixzz2KN9OzDtj 

Dr. Edwin Vieira Jr. on News with Views about the Militia

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
What part of this do you think is the most important? Find out now by watching.



This is the part of the argument that almost everyone is missing, at least on the media.
Nobody there wants to talk about the Militia. It has been demonized by the likes of the Southern Poverty Law Center and other mental prostitutes.

Dr. Vieira is the consummate expert on this subject and has written the definitive work on this subject called "The Sword and Sovereignty" This is available on CD now and is an extensive (over 2000 pages) reference and comprehensive study that everyone needs to have.

It's just $39.95 on www.Amazon.com  type in the name.





Thursday, February 7, 2013

Sandy Hook possible false flag event?


Sandy Hook: Law Enforcement Officials Now Admit Possibility of Multiple Shooters


In a shocking twist of events lending credence to theintelhub.com’s investigation, it has now been admitted by officials that there is a potential that multiple shooters carried out the bloody massacre that took place at the Sandy Hook Elementary School the morning of December 14, 2012.
By Shepard Ambellas
theintelhub.com
February 6, 2013
NEWTOWN — New information has now been brought forth by Connecticut State Attorney Stephen Sedensky, suggesting that records pertaining to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting have been sealed to possibly hide the identity of witnesses from multiple shooter suspects and that they should not be unsealed anytime soon.
Officials fear the safety of witnesses.

Gun Grabbers paint target on their own backs!

How the post-Sandy Hook gun control push spectacularly backfired in America
This article by Mike Adams of Natural News really ties it up about what will happen and how Americans will stop the gun grabbers cold in their tracks (literally) if they physically try to collect the guns with force from law abiding people around the country.

Mike doesn't pull any punches here.
May I say in addition to his well thought out scenario:

These gun grabbers are OUTLAWS, who won't abide by the supreme law for the United States, the US Constitution. They are willing to use force to get what they want. They are willing to incite violence against the lawful civil authority of We the People, and are willing to destroy the peace and good order of our communities to take our freedom and only means of self defense. They are seditionists, and when this turns violent, then they fulfill the very definition of treason. They fulfill the very definition of tyrants.

A Sedition is defined as: incitement of violence to overthrow lawful civil authority

The gun grabbers are willing to incite violence against the lawful civil authority of We the People who wrote the US constitution for GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW, not the other way around.

A tyrant is defined in Miriam Webster as:
A. an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution  or B. a usurper of sovereignty

The gun grabbers qualify eminently on both counts. They are tyrants, one and all.

Treason is defined as: A person commits the crime of treason if he levies war against his state or country or sides to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. 

The gun grabbers have declared war on the American people, and everything they propose gives aid and comfort to our enemies, whether they be criminals looking to commit crimes, or other governments, or even domestic enemies within our own government who are themselves also traitors.

We will win this in the end. They can't impose a police state in Amerika, which is what they want, without taking the guns first. That is the history of gun control throughout history. They are arrogant and will stop at nothing. Really they are not just coming for your guns. THEY ARE COMING TO KILL YOU!

The gun grabbers want all those who oppose them to die! They are leftist progressives who have killed over 170 million people just in the 20th Century alone. Look at the history of gun control here:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2013/01/innocents-betrayed-history-of-gun.html

Read Mikes great article here:

http://www.naturalnews.com/038970_gun_control_backfired_America.html#ixzz2KES4Ca6e

Obama gives himself permission to kill you!

Andrew Napolitano asks: When will president's drone murders come home to our shores?

After stonewalling for more than a year federal judges and ordinary citizens who sought the revelation of its secret legal research justifying the presidential use of drones to kill persons overseas – even Americans – claiming the research was so sensitive and so secret that it could not be revealed without serious consequences, the government sent a summary of its legal memos to an NBC newsroom earlier this week.
This revelation will come as a great surprise, and not a little annoyance, to U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who heard many hours of oral argument during which the government predicted gloom and doom if its legal research were subjected to public scrutiny. She very reluctantly agreed with the feds, but told them she felt caught in “a veritable Catch-22,” because the feds have created “a thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the executive branch of our government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws, while keeping the reasons for their conclusion a secret.”
Read more at 
http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/obama-gives-himself-permission-to-kill/#psSczYYBbMeWFZ7h.99 

Montana leads to stop drone use in our state!



Here is where you can track all the various states working on anti drone legislation.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Doctor Warns: Obama taking over Psychiatry


Exclusive: Dr. Lee Hieb explains dangerous weapon in hands of state


Dr. Lee Hieb is an orthopaedic surgeon specializing in spinal surgery. She is past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a free market medical organization.

In the administration’s latest push to limit the Second Amendment rights of its citizens, the term “mental health” is being bantered about and used as common ground between anti-gun activists and staunch defenders of gun rights.
Sen. Roy Blunt, Missouri Republican and NRA backer, objected to President Obama’s proposals but agreed the “focus should be on mental health.” Others, while proclaiming support for the Second Amendment, propose “a meaningful conversation about mental health,” or that we should “identify people who are mentally ill.” After all, how could anyone support guns in the hands of the mentally ill?
Wait … not so fast. The problem is one of definition: Who is mentally ill?

Nullification - What the founders really meant and said

This two part series sets the record straight on nullification of bad "laws" in a way that should be major news across this land, but sadly will probably go mostly un-noticed, that is unless you forward the title link to everyone and make this go viral.


By Publius Huldah
February 
5, 2013
NewsWithViews.com
This is The Age of Ignorance. Our “intellectuals” can’t think. Our “scholars” parrot each other. The self-educated fixate on idiotic theories. Our People despise Truth and disseminate lies.
Nullification deniers such as Matthew Spalding of Heritage Foundation, Jarrett Stepman of Human Events, law professor Randy BarnettDavid Barton of Wallbuilders, and history professor Allen C. Guelzo, say that nullification by States of unconstitutional acts of the federal government is unlawful and impossible. They make the demonstrably false assertions that:
 States don’t have the right to nullify unconstitutional acts of the federal government because our Constitution doesn’t say they can do it;
 Nullification is literally impossible;
 The supreme Court is the final authority on what is constitutional and what is not; and The States and The People must submit to whatever the supreme Court says; and
 James Madison, Father of Our Constitution, opposed nullification.
Their assertions contradict our Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, our federal Constitution, and what James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and Alexander Hamilton really said.
What are the Two Conditions Precedent for Nullification?