Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9370 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Thursday, May 25, 2023

The Great Pipeline and Land Grab Frauds

 By Anna Von Reitz

Information provided to H.E. Cardinal Mamberti and the Vatican Chancery Court regarding our Claim March 6 2005, January 19 2023 in seq: 

We have mentioned in passing the attempt by Jimmy Carter to transfer the birth certificates of all the phony Municipal citizens of the United States that the colluding Municipal Corporations conjured up to the United Nations back in the 1980's.  

The fact that this citizenry doesn't actually exist via any valid private contract apparently missed the two run amok Municipal Corporations housed in the District of Columbia.  

Once again, these commercial corporations masquerading as governments colluded against the best interests of the people they are supposed to be serving, and took these purloined clearinghouse receipts. aka "birth certificates"  offshore and offered them to the International Monetary Fund as collateral securing more debt and to the United Nations as a political trust, thereby unlawfully converting Americans to the foreign political status of "UN citizens" with no more public notice or disclosure than all the other fraud schemes and unlawful conversion schemes that went before. 

The International Monetary Fund, a brain-child of John D. Rockefeller and other former Standard Oil shareholders and investors, acquired the trademarks including the brand name of "the United States Treasury" in 1924 and has been secretly and deceitfully using this name to collect "Federal Income Taxes" and to do other business ever since. 

While this is technically legal, as the International Monetary Fund owns the trademarks, it results in rampant constructive fraud as people are led to believe that they are being addressed by "the United States Treasury" and not by the International Monetary Fund in a purposeful attempt to avoid suspicion.  

People would be much less likely to pay a tax bill addressed to them by the International Monetary Fund, though in fact this is the source of the demand.  They would also start asking questions, like -- "How do I owe anything to the International Monetary Fund?" 

This is not the only criminal practice engaged in by these former Standard Oil Shareholders and Investors and progeny thereof operating the International Monetary Fund (IMF); they have been working another pipeline monopoly --- only this time using the Swift Banking Transfer System in the banking industry, to do the same exact thing that Standard Oil got busted for in the oil industry.  They have established a transfer (pipeline) monopoly on commercial banking transactions instead of oil and they have used this punitively against customers and competitors, siphoning nightly window trades, selectively losing transactions, refusing services, and more. 

Unfortunately, these illegal and unlawful practices have served to corrupt not only commercial banking, but other sectors of the economy as well; cronies get preferential treatment, access to loans, lower interest, and as long as they do everything the Perpetrators want them to do, good service on their banking transfers.  Industry competitors get no access and bad service if any at all.  When cornered, the IMF will lie outright and attempt to use the aforementioned False Narrative Dossiers compiled by the IRS to accuse their victims of money laundering and similar crimes as a means to put bank regulators off the scent of their own corruption. 

It has taken the world over a hundred years to realize that the illegal and unlawful pipeline transfer monopoly perfected by John D. Rockefeller to control and profit from the oil industry could be applied to other industries as well -- and has been applied to the commercial banking industry.  Not only is this a constructive semantic fraud on the part of the IMF that needs to be addressed, but the Swift System represents an abusive monopoly that needs to end. 

They got away with it once, so they are playing it again.  And others are catching on and playing at the same game.  Wells Fargo puts up its signage as a bank while acting as a securities company, thereby misrepresenting its actual nature and function to the public.  Bank of America does the same thing.  

A similar trademark identity deceit is being played by JP Morgan and Chase Banks right now.  As Creditors to the bankruptcy of the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM they acquired the names and trademarks of the FEDERAL RESERVE, and similar to what the IMF has done passing itself off as the United States Treasury, JP Morgan and Chase are passing themselves off as the FEDERAL RESERVE and are seeking plenary control over the banking system. 

A new court filing,  U.S. Government docket No. OP-1670,  exposes the grotesque surveillance and control powers that they seek to exercise over all U.S. bank accounts --- powers allowing them to seize depositor's credit and other assets, freeze accounts, refuse service, surveil all activities including individual purchases of goods, ability to block assets and so on. 

We have seen it before and don't need to see it again.  

These banks are all organized as corporations and all seek protection as corporations from the same public that they are victimizing.  They all need to be shut down and restructured to serve their intended simple purposes in a lawful manner that respects the privacy owed to the individual people who are depositors and the obligation of all corporations in this country to obey the Constitutions while operating on our land and soil.   

We wish for all bank fees to be fully disclosed and published and agreed to by customers prior to commencement of any deposits being made; in the absence of such prior efforts, only reasonable and customary fees for services are to be assumed. 

We wish for banks to be prohibited from setting up escrow or credit or other subsidiary accounts in the names of their depositors without full disclosure and signed agreement concerning the existence of these accounts, the purpose of these accounts, and the transactions going through these accounts.  

We wish for banks to be prohibited from assuming any ownership interest in depositor's assets based on the assessment of unbilled service fees, inactivity, or other similar claims based on unbilled and uncollected service fees and presumptions of abandonment. 

We wish for the banks to make every reasonable effort to locate depositors and to respect the ownership rights of the depositors instead of assuming an ownership interest where only a custodial interest is intended and merited.  

We wish for all and any bank business that results in the transfer of property or any change in property rights, to be fully disclosed and fully discussed and to be agreed to without coercion prior to any contract or action resulting in such transfer or change. 

We wish for all bank offers to be equitable in fact --- prohibiting gratuitous and unearned security interests and failures to share credit with asset owners. 

We did not allow these corporations to be created in order to be coerced and defrauded and ruled over by them.  They are intended to serve the Public Good and if they do not serve our Public Good they have no right or reason to exist in our country.  

These banks have been engaged in activities that are both illegal and unlawful against American State Nationals and American State Citizens and both Municipal Corporation Subcontractors have been engaged in misrepresentation and unlawful conversion in support of these predatory acts and constructive fraud schemes. 

We wish for the nascent identity fraud offered by JP Morgan and Chase Bank to be stopped and for them to be required to disclose their ownership interests and identity in the same way that we wish for the International Monetary Fund to be forced to disclose its relationship to the "United States Treasury" trademark. 

This mischief of corporations acquiring trademarks and brand names by various means and then misrepresenting or hiding their actual corporate identity behind the acquired trademark or brand, has to end. 

The use and abuse of Territorial Municipal Corporation franchises and City-operated Municipal Corporation franchises named after living people that are merely presumed to exist on the basis of non-disclosed and fraudulently obtained registrations, must come to an end, too.  

We wish for the pipeline-style monopoly of the Swift interbank transfer system to be replaced with a simple, transparent, and private bank transfer system, that is immune to political considerations and
manipulation for profit.

We have also touched upon the land grabbing that has gone on at the hands of the British Territorial Municipal Corporation and its State-of-State franchises going around and applying fanciful titles and descriptions to our surveyed metes and bounds land and soil property assets. This was done under the deliberate False Registration process that then gave rise to the equally False Presumption that we are British Subjects and therefore, presumed to be residents and tenants on our own land. 

This practice was so widespread, so pernicious, and so determinedly non-disclosed and misrepresented that Americans were left unaware of what these criminals were doing.  

Similar to the IMF misrepresenting itself as the United States Treasury, these land titles and descriptions were secretly applied to land and soil parcels belonging to individual Americans under color of law, and then used to further mischaracterize them as Municipal-owned parcels described as residential, agricultural or commercial properties.  

This is the equivalent of white-collar claim jumping under color of law. 

We have reason to believe that the British Government acting under the auspices of the British Monarch promoted this entire scheme and instructed its Undeclared Foreign Agents working for the British Crown (Bar Attorneys) to form "National Associations" for the management of all this purportedly "abandoned" American land and to act "for" all the  merely presumed-to-exist British seamen's estates held in the names of Americans.  

This resulted in these so-called "National Associations" controlling and taxing large areas of our land and soil and assessing property taxes and taking out loans against our land and soil, which they have been using as collateral for them and their spending under "Masterline and Masterform" Credit Agreements, as if they were the actual owners and we were their Serfs and Tenants, all without firing a shot or contributing a penny.  

Both the Territorial fraud artists and City-operated Municipal Corporations have been in on this absurd fraud scheme since the 1930's with the result that no actual land or soil has legitimately traded hands in this country since the British Entitlement Scheme began. 

Actual British Territorial U.S. Citizens have always "resided" here under the provisions of the Residence Act and have never been able to own land in this country.  Their property interests have been limited to a trusteeship under the British Monarch, with the individuals acting as Tenants. By registering American babies as British Subjects, the grafters were able to legally presume that all our land was held under a similar arrangement--- and that appears to be one of the primary motivations for all the false registrations,  

This has allowed these Con Artists and Undeclared Foreign Agents to use our land and soil as collateral for their debts and to impose property taxes on us under the False Presumption that we were stateless or otherwise voluntarily adopting British Territorial U.S. Citizenship. 

All of this could have been and should have been avoided, if these Subcontractors had simply operated in good faith as required by their service contracts, but the temptations of self-interest and the schemes of evil men in high places have guided them instead --- and this has  resulted in Americans paying trillions of dollars in property taxes and other taxes and interest on taxes --- that we never owed. 

We wish for the purloined assets to be returned free and clear and unencumbered to the people they actually belong to, together with all beneficial material and non-material interests. 

We wish for the return of our purloined money tokens and credit and all else that was perforce stolen under color of law by these Municipal Corporations housed in the District of Columbia and their various State-of-State franchises and Agencies and affiliates acting under their direction. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
                  The United States of America
                  In care of: Box 520994
                  Big Lake, Alaska 99652

May 25th 2023


See this article and over 4100 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Land Recording Functions

 By Anna Von Reitz

If you stopped and thought about it when the topic first came up, all LAND recording is in international jurisdiction.  Why? Because land itself is an international jurisdiction.  That's why the Federation gets involved in supporting Land Recording Offices and helps them set standards and work out details so that they comply with international law. 

We have traditionally had a vast system of land recording offices in this country both at the County level and the State of State level, but these local offices were serving in international jurisdiction the entire time, and have been doing an international function for the people living in their respective areas since they opened their doors.  A County Land Recording Office and a State of State Land Recording Office do the same exact thing as an International Land Recording Office, they just provide the service on a local basis.  

When we first started the pushback to record and publish our political status documents we had three possible ways to do it.  We could record them with a County Land Office, with a State-of-State Land Office, or by publishing three times within three months in a local newspaper.  

Once the District Attorneys and others of their ilk figured out that the "cows" were getting out of their corral and establishing admissible evidence of their political status choices, they began telling the recorders that they couldn't record our paperwork, even though that was (and is) against the law.  Some counties, especially those in Illinois and the Deep South pushed back and obeyed the law, but many didn't, with the result that a great many people were having difficulty publishing their chosen political status in their county or even their State. 

At one point, over 50% of all political status records for this entire country were being established in just two Counties that kept their Land Recording Offices open.  

Unable to keep us from recording (because blocking us was against the law) the DA's and their politician cronies began wholesale closures of Land Recording Offices at both the County and State-of-State levels. 
They were going to stop us from recording and publishing our political status one way or the other.  If the Land Recorders and Land Offices insisted on obeying the law, they were shut down and out of a job. 

If we went the newspaper route, the same quasi-political process occurred.  The publishers got a visit from a lawyer or an FBI Agent or some other member of the "law enforcement" community, and pretty soon the newspapers were refusing to run our small "Public Notice" ads in their papers. 

The message was clear.  Even though it is against the law in every State of the Union for them to refuse us this service, they were going to interfere and shut us down using every means possible, including shutting down the Land Recording Offices themselves.  

The Land Recording Office where I established the bulk of my own records no longer exists.  

In some countries, like England and Italy, it got so bad that there was only one office left open, and that office was "sequestered" --- operating under a name that did not disclose its function and so was hidden from the view of the General Public.  
Faced with this kind of obstruction from the British Territorial State-of-State Governments and the political leveraging being applied to newspapers under color of law, we realized that we had to provide these services for ourselves.  So we did.  The LRS was born, because it was desperately needed. 

It was set up as an international service because: (1) Land is an international jurisdiction, and (2) we were aware that we were not the only country having this problem.  In many places, the obstructionism was even worse. 

After the fact, as the State Assemblies were first putting together their General Assembly functions, they realized the need to keep records for themselves at the State level, so the LRO was born, and basically stood in place of all the State-of-State Land Recording Offices that were closing down. This was a wonderful development, too, because it kept continuity of service going in-state.  There was someone local to help
get the recording and publishing functions done despite all the County and State-of-State office closures. 

I was delighted with the development of both services and there has never been a doubt in my mind that they were both needed and that both would have plenty of work.   

People naturally like being able to meet and talk to local service providers directly, which was made possible in this country by the LRO, but in situations where Americans were living in remote areas, shut in, or residing in other countries for whatever reason, they could still go through the LRS and get the job done, while everyone throughout the rest of the world who needed the same service, could also go to the LRS for help. 

Maybe the immensity of the need and the problem hasn't come home to people yet, but there are 320 million Americans who need this service, whether they know it or not, and at least two billion people worldwide who are living in countries where recording services have been restricted or "made unavailable" by the commercial corporations masquerading as governments.  That is an unimaginably huge potential client base and the need for the service is only going to grow. 

Our fledgling all-volunteer services are in no way prepared or able to handle that kind of demand, yet we have to boot up and provide it, at least until other countries can get on their feet and start providing this vital service for themselves again.  

Imagine my horror when the LRS was attacked by commercial interests and shut down?  And imagine how wrong-headed the infighting between those running the LRO and the LRS has always been?  These two start-ups should have been comrades and working together to fill the bottomless need set before them, and instead we had months of sniping and criticism and outright lies being told by both "sides" of this imaginary competition.  

Recently, there have been signs that the LRO wants to start the same kind of fight with the new Global Family Recording System and I have had to come down hard on the LRO because of this fight-fight-fight attitude.  We don't do monopolies in our country, and even if the LRO could possibly do all this work itself, which it can't, it would not be for the Public Good if it did. 

All our eggs should never be in one basket if we can avoid that, and even though the LRS shut down has given us good cause to reflect on that and be glad that the LRO is still here, certain leaders who are strong advocates for the LRO system are not getting the message.  We need MORE competent venues for recording and publishing, not less. 

By all means, build up the LRO system.  Make it better, faster, more convenient, and less expensive. Train the LRO Recorders to be the best and most helpful service providers in the world.  But don't imagine that this is a competition against some other similar service.  This is a competition against evil in the world, which would relegate countless people to the political status of slaves without us.  

I am personally very glad and grateful ---- and relieved, to have the Global Family International Recording System up and flying, because I know how many people desperately need this service.  I am also grateful to have the recording-publishing-prepaid credit account functions streamlined, so that people entering through any service portal  -- users of the former LRS, the LRO, and new users of the Global Family service -- can gain access to their credit accounts without having to re-do their paperwork or do a bunch of new paperwork. 

The new Global Family Recording System will allow seamless communication so that when a person publishes on the LRO, or any other recognized Recording System, they are eligible to get a prepaid credit account at the same time through our International Trade Bank.  This will drastically cut down the amount of paper pushing for everyone, and expedite receiving the financial relief we have planned for. 

So whether you go through the LRO or the new Global Family Recording Service, you will be able to record and publish your political status and receive a prepaid credit account with the new International Trade Bank with one set of papers done once. That's a big blessing for everyone and it will extend internationally, too.  Soon there will be Recording Services in other countries and we will be helping people from Ireland to Thailand declare their political status and access money they are owed. 

Now all that has to happen is for the leadership of the LRO to sit down with the leadership of the new Global Family Recording Service and work out the details of how the LRO is going to affirm that individual people  in their system are recorded and eligible for a prepaid account.  It should be as easy as a single button and a "ping!" saying, "Yes, John Ambrose Gardner of Pleasantville, New York, is recorded on our system. He's eligible!"

In time to come, I fully expect that multiple respectable service providers will engage and provide recording services for a wide variety of needs beyond simply establishing political status preferences. Most of us will need to record the original jurisdiction births of our children.  Many will want to publish their land patents, too. My point is that land recording functions go beyond just publishing and recording political status, even though that is the primary focus right now.  

There will be a continuing worldwide need for land recording services of various kinds now and in the future. Those engaged in the fine pursuit of helping people establish their correct nationality and political status and helping them establish their claims to their own property need to work together with goodwill and mutual respect and understanding.   

The better system is the one that provides better service to more people and does it more accurately and with faster turn around and lower costs.  Let all competition begin and end with that realization, and let everyone turn full attention to working together and getting the job done.  


See this article and over 4100 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.