Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

CSKT Water Compact Throws Thousands of Montanans “under the bus”

This letter by the President of the Montana Senate, Senator Debby Barrett, needs to be sent out to everyone in Montana, who need to send it to each and every legislator From their area.  SEND THIS OUT UNTIL YOUR FINGERS BLEED.
Paul Stramer

Note:  our sincerest thanks to Senator Debby Barrett President of the Montana Senate, for this OpEd piece concerning the water compact.  It has gone out to newspapers state wide.  It is wonderful to know that our voices have not gone unheard.  Share this with everyone you know!!!!!!!!!!
CSKT Water Compact throws thousands of Montanans “under the bus”
By: Senator Debby Barrett
As a rancher with deep roots on a family place in southwest Montana, I know something about the importance of history—and water rights.  I also understand negotiation and compromise.  That’s why I have served on the state’s Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission since 2011 and voted for some compacts. However, during my time on the reserved water rights commission, I’ve voted “no” to provisions within this compact on seven occasions.  Here is why I will not support the proposed CSKT Compact.
The Legislature’s role is to examine a proposed compact and decide whether or not to enact it into Montana law.  The Legislature’s responsibility and authority includes amending proposals if necessary, and approving all state costs associated with a compact such as this one. (The price tag of the state’s share on the CSKT compact is $55 million total).  But at an informational meeting held by proponents, the Legislature was warned that it cannot amend the proposal.  It’s a “take it or leave it” deal.
That insult to the constitutional role of the Legislature is enough for me to want to leave it. Other proposed compacts have not been thrust on us, the Legislature, with such arrogance and disrespect for Legislators.  But there are other good reasons, too.
The 2013 Legislature refused to ratify the last CSKT Water Right Compact, for many good reasons concerning its legality and equal treatment of this state’s citizens, both on and off the reservation.  In fact, the primary proponents of the Compact this time concede that the previous version was very flawed and needed to be rejected.
Now, it has been re-introduced, but not much changed or improved.  While one portion of it was somewhat re-negotiated during the interim between the 2013 and the 2015 Legislative Sessions, the result did not improve that portion enough to protect local individual water users, both tribal members and nonmembers, and failed completely to address legal and policy shortcomings, on and off reservation, in the original proposal.
Off the Flathead reservation, these failures include more than a dozen permanent surrenders of the Legislature’s authority over water in Montana, allowing the CSKT to choose whether to obey legislative enactments or not and giving them complete immunity from compliance with important aspects of Montana water and environmental law, including the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA).  It also requires the State to give partial ownership of some of its water rights and its contracts for water to the CSKT and to manage those assets for the Tribes’ benefit, rather than all citizens of the State.  In essence, this proposed Compact requires the State to limit its legal authority off the reservation by sharing it with the CSKT--permanently.
On reservation, it gives the CSKT the water right to 110,000 acres of irrigated land owned by individuals, whose irrigation districts have filed on that same water right.  It also reduces irrigation water to many if not all these irrigators, who are tribal members and nonmembers, and it establishes a unique water administration code and governing body, with the State of Montana again compromising its constitutional authority over water rights.
I recognize there are powerful supporters of SB 262, including some elected officials who managed to negotiate changes to the proposals, protecting their constituents at home.  Having heard the evidence as a member of the Compact Commission, I believe the off-reservation in stream flow water rights the Compact gives are not scientifically based or well-grounded in law or history.  But I also recognize that the CSKT and their public relations people have artfully threatened much of the state with water right filings for in stream flows if the Legislature doesn’t simply accept this “take it or leave it” deal.
As a rancher and a Senator who values little ahead of private property rights, I think I know when to call a bluff, and when to stand my ground no matter what.  This is such a time.  Not all values and principles should be compromised away.  I do not believe my fellow ranchers and farmers really want to turn their backs on the thousands of Montanans whose property, including water rights, will be devastated by this proposal.
The proposed CSKT compact is the perfect example of overreaching in negotiations, causing their failure.  The CSKT and federal government on their behalf demanded too much, and the Compact Commission negotiators surrendered too much.  As a state we tried for years to negotiate a deal good for all.  In this compact alone, that has proven to be impossible.  So, it’s time to recognize that this compact is not going to work, and we must prepare to protect the State’s rights, interests,  and sovereignty.  This compact is not just poor policy, sacrificing the rights of thousands of Montanans to protect the rest of the state is the worst policy possible.
Senator Debby Barrett, R-Dillon, is an eight-term lawmaker representing Senate District 36 in the Montana Legislature.  She serves as Senate President for the 64th legislative session.

And here is a message for Governor Bullock and the Montana Legislators who will be voting on this compact.

Published on Feb 7, 2015
Elaine Willman, author of 'Going to Pieces: The Dismantling of the United States of America' says the CSKT Water Compact is like ObamaCare over water in Montana. We must protect Montana's water for ALL Montanans.

ernie wayne ter Telgte Civiliter Mortuus

"Civiliter Mortuus" : p. 223 - Black's 5th 
Civilly dead; dead in the view of the law.
The condition of one who has lost his civil rights and capacities, and is accounted dead in law.

ernie's researched opinions:

ernie: This ties into CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTI which = GRAND REDUCTION/LOSS of Civil rights and mental capacities, resulting in the NAME of the so-called :dead in view of the law:" to become a LEGEND, and held as such in ALL GRAND CAPITAL LETTERS of DECEASEMENT.

This artificial death is put into a TRUST AS A CRYPT= ENCRYPTED FORM and becomes a TITLE OF DEATH, having no need of civil anything: THUS, "NO VOICE/NO STANDING/NO LIVING VALUE, only valued by Death;'s CRYPT KEEPERS.... i.e. vault = TRUST UNITED STATE'S = A CRYPT containing another STATE OF MONTANA = CRYPT, suing AT LAW vs. ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE = another CRYPT; this = CAPITALIZING on DEATH, and because the living take too long to die, PRE-DECEASEMENT has been declared by U.S. CRYPT KEEPERS via SHORT (LIFE) FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE, a type of SUDDEN INFANT DEATH "Syndrome", in order that the 7 million $ life Insurance Valuation can be collected at the moment of BIRTH LIVE = D.O.A., DEAD ON ARRIVAL;

this is enhanced further by the AMORTIZATION PRO-CESS (AIN) revealed in the C.U.S.I.P. C.R.I.E.S.  C.A.F.R. funds, the paychecks from the KEEPERS OF THE DEAD, back unto THEMSELVES, while claiming not to be touched by DEATH because THEY put on the BLACK ROBE which wards off DEATH, yet putting up their Talisman,

HONORABLE RICK WEST, between themselves and the DECEASED ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE; in which so doing, showing double-mindedness = competency as THEIR  own TALISMAN is in "CIVILITER MORTUUS' SPELLING;

Now, all corporate entities announce their own PREDECEASEMENT, Prima Facie, every DOCUMENT; then immediately THEY claim to be the LENDER OF rIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, IMMUNITITES to the DECEASED CIVILITER MORTUUS, CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTIO, reduced and DEAD, to "a STATE OF SILENCE" = "reductio ad absurdum"  =  No Voice due to NO BODY (Home)...

Thus the question: QUO WARRANTO the DEAD give anything at all to the living; how can STATES MORTUUS INCORPORATED/DECEASED/SILENT make any contact with the naturally living, especially to govern the living in any way at all; there-fore, such CAPITAL CLAIMS by the UNITED STATES CIVILITER MORTUUS, CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTIO, Reductio ad absurdum CRYPT DWELLERS/KEEPERS establishes the validity of the CLAIM OF MARTIAL LAW - ABRAHAM LINCOLN- EMERGENCY WAR POWERS ACT 1863;



ernie wayne ter Telgte Motions in Liminis

( The following document was filed May 21, 2014 3:39 PM in GALLATIN COUNTY JUSTICE COURT, State of Montana, not Montana state, and forms evidence which contributed along with presentation by the author of the document, that resulted in acquittal) (Lines in Italics and parentheses are not part of the original handwritten document bearing the original court stamp, which I have in my possession)

1. Authority: 1789 Constitution of the united States of America;
My notice: Amendment #1 to said Constitution thru which i claim Full freeness, unabridgeable, to form common, comprehensible sounds as speech, including sounds as symbols on media; nor in any way, do i voluntarily waive any intent positive, towards myself as a living man, as may be expressed, or silent, in said Constitution and Bill of Rights accompanying;

2. Authority: Medical Science;
My notice: i am a natural, living man, composed of the elements of water, soil, air;

3. Authority: Ecclesiastical trust law as began in 1540 a.d., and which is held under CROWN COPYRIGHT LAW;
My notice: that i am not an officer of said trust; nor have i ever, with full knowledge resultant from full disclosure of proffering parties, volunteered to IMPERSONATE any OFFICER;

4. Authority: Judge ARTHUR J. BEHAR'S handwritten notice, on a paper in his possession, that: 
My notice: i proclaimed #s 1-3 to the ADMIRALTY COURT of his jurisdiction, yet he required me to enter into a FOREIGN COURT, reserved only for CORPORATE OFFICERS and THEIR BANKING  activities, which said requirement instantly caused i, the living natural man to be placed, by force, into a state of duress, duly noted by Judge ARTHUR J. BEHAR; and now opens the door to the possibility of tort having been done to my signature intentionally by various county and STATE JUDICIAL and LEGAL ENFORCEMENT ACTORS; some of whom bear TITLES of NOBILITY: ESQUIRE/ATTORNEY, with such titles being forbidden to the States;

6. Authority: 1789 Constitution Article 1- Section 9- sub-section 8 - line 1: "No Title of Nobility Shall be granted by the united States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or Foreign State."; and again in the

7. Authority: 1789 Constitution - Section 10 - subsection 1 - phrase 9: "No State shall ... grant any Title of Nobility.", and such Titles show then, that such BEARERS of Title hold said Title thru the consent of Congress alone, as a Congressional Seal of Approval, such seal called British Accredited Registry, the B.A.R, while the other un-marqued actors afore-mentioned are simply private pirates out for themselves; but, both types require some-one to FALSIFY documents as IMPERSONATING an EXECUTOR;

8. to the proceedings of thich, i do not consent;

9. nor do i consent to being the Surety, the tangible, living mineral asset for, or to , any FICTITIOUS, COMMERCIALIZED, SECURITIZED TRUST; and now, due to the State of duress thrust upon myself by the Court,

10. i command that the ACTORS/STATE bond be immediately brought forward as to establish the evidence, for my inspection, as to who is going to indemnify me, should tort result, in any way to me;

11. Furthermore, i do not consent to the Actors usage of TERMS OF ART,  A.K.A, TERMS OF LEGAL CONTROL/POWER, A.K.A, LEGALESE; to wit, an

12. Authority: UNITED STATES 9TH DISTRICT SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA, directly referenced in DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. DICK ANTHONY HELLER 554 U.S. __ (2008) See p. 3-..."technical meaning"; - "secret or technical meanings that would not have been known to ordinary citizens in the founding generation."; Further such quotes by Justice Scalia, are found in various cites through-out this 63 page CASE: therefore, i here-by motion this current ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION COURT to immediately CLOSE ALL STATE CASES against the Name of i, the living, natural man,.

duress and coercion prime evidence standing
ernie wayne ter Telgte

Certificate of Service and acknowledgement:
that i, the living natural man known as

coercion and duress prime evidence standing
ernie wayne ter Telgte,

have here-by filed this motion in Liminis as my response to the STATE OF MONTANA vs. (not me) ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE, and such response/filing a result of coercion and duress, as noted by JUDGE ARTHUR J. BEHAR on 16 May 2014.  i do not use in any way, any document for the purpose of COPYRIGHT  infringement.