By Anna Von Reitz
Let's see if we can make this as simple as possible for everyone:
When Queen Anne of England sat down on the throne of England in 1702 she was the last English Queen to do so; when she died in 1714, she was the first Monarch of Great Britain. She had, wittingly or unwittingly, vacated the land and soil of England, and "gone to sea".
Every inheritor of her Office has reigned as a British Monarch ever since, with the single present exception of Charles III, who is reigning as an Imperial Majesty. He has vacated both land and sea and is operating in the jurisdiction of the air, in an attempt to escape prosecution.
Each of these jurisdictions is separate, one from the other, and while it is possible to straddle two jurisdictions at the same time, it is not possible to "have standing" on more than two at once.
Why is this? Well, God gave us two feet for a reason.
If you stand on the land and soil you have used up your two jurisdictional claims and have to appoint others to hold your other two jurisdictions on the sea and in the air, for you.
This is the dilemma that gives rise to public trusts, and also to the public trust interests that have been abused for the last 150 years.
Even if you choose to "stand" entirely in one jurisdiction as Charles III is doing in the air jurisdiction, you are said to be in "the Divine Province" and have "the beneficial interest" in your holdings on the land, though not the ownership and possession thereof. A trustee has to manage your land assets for you and that trustee has traditionally been a postmaster appointed by the Pope.
At no time can you act as the same person in three or more jurisdictions, and this is the result of Nature's Law limiting mankind.
And all of this tends to make both international and global law a rabbit warren of curiously constructed and counter-balancing claims and interests as if you are obliged to play chess and parcheesi at the same time.
When you cut through all of the history to the present time, it comes down to this:
1. The land of England is being held by the Hereditary Lord High Steward, who is in absentia in Australia, but still functioning and viable in his Office. He is also able to hold onto England's claims on the sea -- but that means he loses control of the soil. The soil of England is being held by a single man and his cohorts in Suffolk, who have timely posted the appropriate Notices and claims. So, for the moment, the crisis and threat of the success of Globalist claims of England's "abandonment" appear to be stymied and the country as a whole has: His Imperial Highness holding the air, the Lord High Steward holding the land and sea, and John Edward, coming from a small village in Suffolk, is holding the soil of England for the people of England.
2. The situation in Scotland is by no means as transparent, but they do have their traditional King of Scotland position and it appears that King Charles III, re-dubbed King Charles of Scotland, is acting as "King of Scotland" under the Act of Union, and is covering both the land and sea claims of Scotland. Claims to the soil appear to be held by the Hereditary Lords of Glennis and Aberdeen, while the air jurisdiction is being held in trust by church officials.
3. The situation in Ireland is still very mobile. They do have their Ancient King and the modern day holder of this Office is present and accounted for and holding down the land and sea jurisdictions. The traditional (since Roman times anyway) local county assemblies are being called into Session and are taking up position with their claims to the soil, while the same County Assemblies are also claiming the international land jurisdiction. The Irish Brotherhood that fought the Easter Rebellion and gained the establishment of a Constitutional government is maintaining a joint claim to land and air.
4. The condition of Wales is relatively unknown, except that a few traditional county-level assemblies are known to exist and be in Session, which is sufficient to maintain Welsh claims to the land and soil.
By miracles of God, and by the skin of their teeth, the peoples of the British Homeland Isles appear --- with some push and help from their American cousins --- to be safe from Globalist claims that their jurisdictions are "vacant" and that their governments no longer exist.
Bear in mind that all of this hangs by threads and your traditional governments have, over the course of three centuries of ignorance, neglect, and corruption, been reduced to shadows.
If you wish to maintain a competent and stable national government, it is essential that you all pay attention and: (1) learn your history and the jurisdictions of the law and the structures of your traditional government(s) that operate in these jurisdictions; (2) study the actual viable treaties that you have with other other countries and clean them up so that "sea treaties" are not lapping over and being interpreted as land treaties and so on, and so that you have a firm grasp of what you are owed and what your obligations are in the world community.
Confusion about all this on the part of the public, and secretive power-mongering and predatory self-interest on the part of government bureaucrats ---most notably, attorneys-- has led to the deplorable End Game that the proponents of Corporate Feudalism are pushing.
They must be recognized as dangerous usurpers against the rights and property interests of Mankind as a whole, and have their charters and management dealt with accordingly.
Meanwhile, all the "native" peoples of England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales are hereby given fair notice of the condition your traditional governments are in, and you are urged to get busy and pay attention and participate in restoring them to full function.
Please notice that the word "National" can refer to both local government existing within the borders of a country and to international government and its affairs.
For example, if you are standing on the land and soil of Ireland, acting as a living man on the soil and a Lawful Person of the land, you are naturally a member of (2) county governments.
Traditionally, the government on the soil is called a "county" with a small "c", while the level of government representing the international interests of that county's land claims is a "County" with a capital "C".
This is a nomenclature convention left over from the Romans and their language, Latin. Latin is very handy for sorting out these fine points, but at variance with English, which has only one nomenclature for both: "County" --- and leaves you to determine which county is in operation by context.
The existence -- at least in Law -- of the two counties, one in-country and one international -- leads to a situation in which the word "National" can apply to the internal governance of the local government of the soil within the borders of a country, and can also apply to the external international government(s) operating the land and sea jurisdictions of the country.
So, the county assemblies of the soil jurisdiction can get together and agree upon something like "National" (or using Latin conventions "national") election standards for soil jurisdiction offices of local governments nationwide.
Yet, at the same time, the County Assemblies (the same people wearing their international business hat) can all get together and agree upon something like a "National" (using either English or Latin nomenclature conventions) Immigration and Naturalization Law.
One way around this conundrum is to make a clear language distinction between "local county" and "international county" business, and when you are referring to local government use the word "nation" and "nationwide", as opposed to "country" and "countrywide" when referring to international issues.
All of this requires you to think and sometimes do a bit of honest research as a labor of love, but that is certainly preferable to being enslaved and dominated by foreign corporations-- legal fictions which at best are faceless and unaccountable and tend to be predatory.
When diplomats are talking about "nation-states" they are referring to a combination of living people and the land they occupy, and are attempting to recognize that the people (the nation) are separate from the land and soil (the physically defined "state") they live in.
These are basic understandings that we all need to know and include in our thinking if we are to understand history and law. Law that applies to living people and their soil jurisdiction applies to a "nation", while Law that applies to Lawful Persons and their international land jurisdiction applies to a "country".
A little bit farther afield, law that applies to affairs on the sea applies to Legal Persons, and commercial affairs that take place in the realm of corporations apply to other LEGAL PERSONS.
Confusing as this may initially be, it's not that tough. We all function in many different roles --- as parents, as spouses, as grandparents, as teachers, as sports fans, as electors or voters.... and we take this for granted. It should not surprise anyone that in administering our government and acting as self-governing people, we also have different roles and "wear different hats".
Learn your different possible roles -- your "persons" -- and choose them consciously and according to your needs and the needs of your country and your fellowman.
Please also be aware that there is a distinction between your political status as a "national" and your status as a "citizen".
You take your nationality from your land and soil, from the place where you are born. You have no obligation to serve any government at any level as a newborn national.
The obligation to serve a government only accrues to "citizens" and in most countries, obligations of citizenship must be consciously accepted at the age of majority, not foisted off on babies or children in grade school---which has too often been done within both the Roman and British Empires.
Certainly, don't let anyone presume obligations of citizenship upon you or "confer" such obligations on you, without a clear and mutual and fully disclosed and agreeable understanding of your responsibilities and the jurisdiction of the government you are serving when you accept citizenship roles.
All government personnel at all levels are hereby given Due Process and Notice of these facts.
All jurisdictions associated with the "United States" have similarly been accounted for, are claimed, and are in operation and/or Session. Numerous other nation-states have also been verified complete and operational.
NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS; NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS. Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals, and notice to principals is notices to agents and notice to agents is notice to principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
Chief Justice of The Alaska Supreme Court
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
October 6th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
