By Anna Von Reitz
Mr. Trump:
We understand that, according to your sources embedded in the alternative news, you propose that there exist "Federal Lands" and that within these federal lands are valuable mineral deposits worth 150 Trillion dollars.
You also, apparently, propose to securitize those in-ground mineral resources and use them as collateral for pre-borrowing the value of those minerals. Next, in your plan, you will disperse the credit obtained by securitizing the mineral wealth by "giving" each household in America $1.2 million of the credit thus obtained.
Although the details are not made clear, credit unless it is prepaid and offered with no strings attached --- must be paid back;
and by your silence on this matter, we must assume that you are not "giving" each household anything but a debt based on the victim's own assets, $1.2 Million worth of credit that must be paid back plus interest, without any disclosure of the nature of this "gift".
This is not as your propagandists suggest "the greatest transfer of wealth in human history" as credit is never "wealth", especially when it has to be paid back with interest.
There are a number of problems with your plan that we object to.
First, there is very little actual "Federal Land" on this Continent.
What you suppose to be "Federal Land" is instead American State Land that was under Federal Management for a long time.
Just as there is a difference between the actual government and a government services vendor, there is a difference between State land that is being managed by a vendor and land belonging to that vendor.
As of October 1st 2020 lawfully provenanced, declared, recorded, and published individual Americans in all the pre-Civil War States of the Union had properly assembled and brought their State Assemblies into Session.
These same State Assemblies referenced above were polled for a Roll Call Vote and they unanimously enrolled all the Territorial "States" created from 1860 to 2020 under the provisions of the Northwest Ordinance as full-fledged States of the Union, retroactive to the day these States entered so-called "Territorial Statehood".
At that point, the Territorial States sometimes called "the Western States" even though we do not consider West Virginia a western state, were duly enrolled as States of the Union. They and their assets are not available for the dispensation of or rule by any territorial power or governor or, for that matter, any federal corporation.
So, you do not have the power to indebt our in-ground mineral assets by securitizing them as credit collateral in the first place, because these former Territorial States are now States of the Union and they are no longer under any obligation of Territorial Management, or subject to any presumed territorial ownership.
Any and all actual Federal land holdings have to be granted to the Federal entities by the State Assemblies via an approved and official process that results in a land grant naming the recipient and purpose of the grant. There are very few such grants in existence, virtually all of them on the Eastern Seaboard or close to those environs, mostly in or near the District of Columbia.
This is the most Public of numerous Notices that have been served on you, your corporations and their legal staff and administrators, at both federal and Territorial State levels, to make you aware of these changes in ownership, management, and possession of former United States territories.
What remains are the pre-Civil War Territories and Possessions and we are not aware of any great mineral wealth accruing to them.
Please Cease and Desist these duplicitous and inappropriate and False Claims of ownership and also Cease and Desist attempts to mislead the vulnerable American Public with undisclosed commercial offers -- especially any undisclosed offers to indebt their assets "for" them and buy them off with a portion of their own credit presented as a de facto loan that has to be paid back with interest.
Barring a much more formal and explicit presentation of your "offer" resolving the nature of these theoretical "Federal Lands" and the stipulations related to the credit obtained by securitizing the mineral wealth of these "Federal Lands", we must assume the facts as stated above and deem the entire prospect a constructive fraud scheme detrimental to individual American interests and the Public Interest of this country as a whole.
A services vendor operating in the best interests of his employers does not propose to indebt their assets "for" them via a securitization scheme, give them a portion of the credit thus raised, and leave them holding the bag.
This is not good business and certainly not good faith.
If you have some other explanation or additional information that you wish us to consider, feel free to contact us at the address below; otherwise, we must seek the protection of the international trustees and international law to prevent the current plans to "bait" Americans into accepting this undisclosed offer.
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
August 22nd 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.