Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 10,360 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. WHAT THEY WRITE IS THEIR OWN OPINION, just as what I write is my own.


Tuesday, November 3, 2026

International Public Notice: Important -- What They Never Teach You

 By Anna Von Reitz

This is what the British Territorial United States Government teaches and what appears in Wikipedia: 

"The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America.  It superseded the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, on March 4th, 1789.  Originally including seven articles, the Constitution defined the foundational structure of the federal government."

What they totally obscure and misconstrue is the identity of "the United States" in this context, and the identity of which "federal government" is being referenced.  

The actual Federal Constitution issued in 1787, not 1789, is not The Constitution of the United States, nor is it The Constitution of the United States of America. 

The first, only, original, and never superseded Federal Constitution is The Constitution for the united States of America, which was, self-evidently issued to the States of America.  

The States of America was the doing-business-as name of our Confederation of States-of-States, with members doing business as, for example, The State of Wisconsin.  This Confederation was adopted in 1781 during the War of Independence.  Prior to that, all the functions of the Confederation were provided by our unincorporated Federation of States.  

The States of America subsequently took over the administration of what was popularly known as the Federal Republic, which was operated as a subcontractor of the States of America under The Constitution for the united States of America, and made responsible for exercising certain limited and enumerated delegated duties in the international land jurisdiction.  

Here's the kicker: the Federal Republic did business as "the United States" -- Incorporated, an American-owned corporation operating out of a headquarters in the District of Columbia, as a Subcontractor of the States of America  --- the actual holder of the above referenced contract adopted in 1787, The Constitution for the united States of America. 

So, even though it did business as the United States ---Incorporated, the Federal Republic was a corporation operated by the States of America Confederation. 

This "United States" -- Incorporated, is a completely separate "United States" and functioned under The Constitution for the united States of America, not The Constitution of the United States, which was issued three years later to a different Subcontractor -- the Holy Roman Empire. 

Are you confused yet?  

The States of America Confederation formed in 1781 gets the service contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America in 1787 and organizes a corporation doing business as "the United States" -- Incorporated, to provide the enumerated services.

Three years later, the Holy Roman Empire gets a separate service contract known as The Constitution of the United States. 

So, which entity doing business as "the United States" are we talking about?  The States of America Confederation doing business as the United States (Incorporated)?  Or the Holy Roman Empire doing business under the Constitution of the United States?  

It's true that the military Subcontractor doing business as the United States of America (Inc.) is subject to a civilian Subcontractor, but which "United States" is the civilian Subcontractor intended?  

The American Subcontractor doing business as the United States (Incorporated) and the Holy Roman Empire Subcontractor doing business under The Constitution of the United States are both civilian authorities.  

But which "United States" is the legitimate and intended civilian authority?

The answer to that is revealed by the underlying treaties that were adopted during the peace process ending The War of Independence, because the three (3) Federal Constitutions are the implementations of treaties ---and resulting power-sharing agreements in each of the three international jurisdictions: Land, Air, and Water. 

The American Subcontractor was responsible for the delegated powers of the Land. 

The British Territorial Subcontractor was responsible for the delegated powers on the Sea. 

The Holy Roman Empire Subcontractor was responsible for the delegated powers in the Air Jurisdiction.  

Take notice that only the delegated powers are under discussion and the Subcontractors are all hired by and are responsible to the same employer(s)--- our States of the Union and our unincorporated Federation of these States, known as The United States of America.

So, the Wikipedia entry should read: 

"The Constitution for the united States of America is the supreme law for the United States of America (Incorporated)....." because this is the only Federal Subcontractor that ever had any jurisdiction or duties or enumerated powers on the land jurisdiction of this country. 

The reason it doesn't read that way is two-fold.  

On February 2nd 1871, the British Territorial U.S. Congress latched upon the United States, Incorporated, and that means the Federal Republic, as abandoned property, together with all corporations ("persons") operated as franchises of the United States, Incorporated, and all beneficial contracts.  

That is, they unilaterally acted as Successors and Salvagers, and began exercising land jurisdiction delegated powers never entrusted to them.    

They seized the assets belonging to their American Employers -- assets which they were supposed to protect for us, but which they seized for their own benefit without disclosure to the American Public. 

Thereafter, they began operating these commandeered corporations as British Territorial corporations subject to British Territorial law, but they operated them under the same names and retained many if not all of the civilian employees, so as to mask this fundamental change in ownership and management. 

The second reason is that the Americans were fooled by this clever, quiet substitution scheme and deluded by the seeming continuity of services and government; we were deliberately misled and encouraged to think that the Reconstruction of our government was accomplished soon after the so-called Civil War. 

The Reconstruction of the American Federal Republic and the American Confederation still remains to be done, mainly because our dishonest and self-interested foreign Federal Subcontractors never said a word, never attempted to contact the Federation, never shared any information with the State Assemblies. 

Instead, these false-hearted service vendors lied through their teeth and told the world that we were "missing", "in interregnum", whereabouts unknown, and they deliberately portrayed anyone questioning any of their actions as a "rebel" and part of the defeated Confederate States of America -- even when those questioning them were born and bred in Wisconsin more than a hundred years after the end of any hostilities associated with the mercenary conflict known, deceitfully, as the American Civil War.   

This substitution fraud could not have been accomplished without the cooperation and complicity of the Holy Roman Empire, which was misidentified as the civilian authority in charge of the military subcontractors, even though their Constitution, The Constitution of the United States, conferred air jurisdiction duties and delegated responsibilities, not land jurisdiction duties and obligations. 

Look at the first line of the Wikipedia entry again: 

"The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America...."

Is air jurisdiction law the supreme law of the United States of America.....?  That is, commercial law?  Or canon law?  Or ecumenical law? 

Or is the supreme law of all Federal Subcontractors neatly summed up in Article VI, the Supremacy Clause, of the very first Federal Constitution issued in 1787?  

There is a reason that this "supreme law" is referred to as the Law of the Land, not the Law of the Air.  

It's because we never allotted any land jurisdiction duties, delegated or otherwise, to foreign interests, and never intended for the "civilian authority" to be vested in the Federal Civil Servants working under The Constitution of the United States.  

We clearly intended that our own American Federal Civil Servants would be in charge of our military subcontractors and that they would also have oversight on the activities of the other Federal Civil Servants who worked for the Holy Roman Empire.  

We clearly stated in all three (3) Federal Constitutions, that the Law of the Land was supreme. 

So, here's the situation:  Two foreign services vendors, one a British Territorial vendor of military (mostly naval) services, and the other, a Holy Roman Empire vendor of services (mostly postal) took criminal advantage of a situation they caused, to defraud their employers and redefine their own roles and duties without the consent or even the knowledge of their actual employers. 

They patted themselves on the back and Brits who already had a 40/60 Joint Venture going with the Popes, readily accepted the "civilian" authority of the Holy Roman air jurisdiction service vendors, instead of the American civilian authority intended.  

You have that confirmed in Wikipedia, and in thousands of pages of public and private documents that are readily available, once you know what you are looking at.  

Let's look at their next False Claim, that this cozy arrangement of theirs "superseded the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, on March 4th, 1789".  

No, what really happened on March 4th 1789 is that the British Territorial Subcontractor received its service contract, and shortly thereafter began fine-tuning it with such actions as the Judiciary Act, allowing their courts to separate themselves from the Land Jurisdiction Courts.  

Their contract had nothing to do with our land jurisdiction and didn't supersede any commercial services provided by our own State-of-State vendors and their Confederation on the land.  

What they are talking about is that they began administering maritime commercial contracts as of March 4th 1789. 

The Articles of Confederation were never a Constitution, much less the "first constitution" of our nation-states, yet they clearly give the reader this False Impression.  

What they are actually talking about is that British commercial interests were allowed, by treaty, to continue operations in our country and British merchants were allowed to provide services under maritime contracts after the War of Independence.  

This accommodation does not "supersede" the Articles of Confederation, it simply removed a small portion of commercial business from the original State of State Confederation, and placed it under British Territorial oversight instead. 

That original Confederation continued to operate for another seventy-two years and was only overcome by its own failure to compromise. 

So now we come to the final question --- was any of this breach of trust, treason, intrigue, and criminality necessary?  Were the Brits and the Romans really forced into overstepping their contractual limitations by emergency situations beyond their control?  

No, they weren't.  The British and their Roman business partners did this with malice aforethought.  

This is proven because they played the same scheme over and over again in an estimated sixty (60) other countries, with little variation.  

It's also proven by the suppression, harassment, and mistreatment, theft, murder, and slander, that six generations of faithful Federation Officers have suffered at the hands of their employees, by their employee's theft of the Great Seals, their impersonation of our Federation in 1868, their eager accessing of our nation's credit, their false registration of our people, and their other criminal acts, deceits, and misrepresentations in Breach of Trust, violation of their Service Contracts, and general Dishonor. 

These Principals and their agents have been given more than sufficient Notice and Due Process to correct their operations and legal presumptions which has prompted our action this afternoon exposing the gross extent of their debts to their employers and the action to foreclose upon their trade and commercial holdings. 

All members of "the US" military are hereby summoned to correct their presumptions and assumptions and accept the direction of the actual civilian authority that remains on the land and soil of this country, their actual Employers, the States of the Union, the State Citizens of the States of the Union, and their instrumentality, The United States of America --- our unincorporated Federation of States. 

We are the ones that delegated the delegated powers and we are the ones who receive back those delegations of power when the recipients and successors to contract fail to perform.  You are not subject under The Constitution of the United States and never were.  You were subject under The Constitution for the united States of America, and in the absence of the Confederation operating the Federal Republic, your oath and loyalty belongs to us, the States of the Union and the State Assemblies of declared State Citizens and state nationals.  

Issued by: 
Justice Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

November 2nd 2026

------------------
See this article and over 6000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations?  Find out here.