Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 4600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment.

Thursday, October 10, 2019

My Reply to More Questions --- Purportedly from Flag Officers


By Anna Von Reitz

I have been assured that I am corresponding with a liaison for the Flag Officers of this country, and there has been some corroboration of that, but I am beginning to think that my leg is being pulled. If this is indicative of the level of knowledge possessed by military officers at the Flag level, we are all in a lot of trouble. See for yourselves:
From Flags:
I don't know where to begin except to say this Judge Anna woman needs help. Some serious help because she shouldn't believe the crap she writes and spews as it makes her seem to be a very delusional person. Maybe someone is feeding her this crap and she bought into it. We pray she gets some help. Paul, I will only communicate with you so at least you know of the truth do, document and we share - and it's free Plus, POTUS and Barr are very aware of what we have done and what's in queue.
From Anna:
Then why is it that Senior JAG Officials agree with me and not with you? Why is it that they have told everyone the truth --- that there have been hundreds if not thousands of such "Arbitration Awards" over the years, and not one of them fulfilled? I am aware of this. Why aren't you, if you are such an expert?
Where were you when General Roy took the Farm Union Cases to the United States Supreme Court? Why do I know what they told him and you don't? Face it, you just got involved in all this ---at most 3-4 years ago-- and you are trying to assert that you know more about it than someone who has spent more than forty years studying this situation. Keep going on like this, and you will continue to be utterly useless and also in dereliction of duty.
From Flags:
Paul, you may want to ask her, how is a claim (Phil's) of your actual birthrights from the Creator not superior to a fiction of law American?
From Anna:
Apples and oranges again, or more like apples and kumquats. The Kingdom of Heaven has nothing to do with "the" Kingdom of God. Same basic confusion. Same logic default. Maybe if you get one "Aha!" moment, you will be able to see it all, but until then, you just make assumptions and more assumptions, and in the process try to put words in my mouth.
I have been in the front lines with Kurt Kallenbach, revealing that the Divine Origin of each of us has been "papered over" by the "birth day" (recorded entrance time) and then again by the "birth date" (registered exit time). The situation is like being marooned at sea and claiming to be, instead, out in the middle of Kansas.
Our actual point of incarnation occurs by an Act of God resulting in fertilization of an egg and formation of a unique zygote from which all else follows. That's the truth and that's where our Divine Birthright originates from, along with our Natural and Unalienable Rights. But Phil made no reference to any of that. He stayed firmly out to sea. So who is "delusional"?
From Flags:
She claims State national is highest yet now claims American? Where are the docs allowing all capacities, characters, conditions, status and standings utilized and effectuated today by the alleged government? Why doesn't she post proof of her definitions. It seems she is always saying in a round about way this is the way it is and so what.
From Anna:
That's because even though I gave you explicit directions and proof of exactly where these different kinds of political status are defined --- and repeat myself --- you still try to pretend that I haven't answered you when I have answered you---and far more than one time.
Here it is again:
American State National defined at: 8 USC 1101 (a) 21.
American State Citizen defined at: 8 USC 1101 (a) 22 (B).
United States Citizen and Municipal citizen of the United States defined in any of the three (3) Constitutions at: Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3 and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2.
And as for me saying, "So what?" --- it's because you are bringing forward non-issues as if they were issues, or as if they were cause for surprise or discussion. Why wouldn't the King be Arch-Treasurer of a British Territorial corporation doing business as "the" United States of America?
That doesn't make him Arch-Treasurer of the American Federation of States doing business as The United States of America----which is what you are trying to claim.
From Flags:
I am sure during our next meeting which is to be held again at the Charlottesville Winery I could really impress the Flag Officers and Eric if I could produce J Pegs from Anna of the 3 Constitutions she speaks of. But she won't and you know why.
From Anna:
And why would I have to provide you with anything that you can easily go out and obtain for yourself and which you have a duty to obtain---- and follow ---- if you call yourself a "Flag Officer" ?
Go to the Congressional Library ---like we all did--- to satisfy yourself that I am not just making this up, because with your disgusting attitude, I could give you mint condition copies of the original documents delivered on a silver platter, and you would say I faked them.
Remember these are the names and dates of the Constitutions:
1. The Constitution for the united States of America (1787)
2. The Constitution of the United States of America (1789)
3. The Constitution of the United States (1790)
And don't try to pretend (again) that your lack of Due Diligence is my fault or responsibility.
From Flags:
At this point the Flag asked me to tell Anna they would like to speak with the continental marshals she claims to be working with and what is their contact info? I told them that's the BS she makes up to keep her ignorant lemming followers continuing to follow her music of baiting hope never to deliver anything.. Yes, that request was made in jest as they have read much of the incoherent statements and claims on her website.
From Anna:
I suggest that they speak directly with Senior Chief Marshal Tresa Haywood. I will give Paul the contact information to pass on to you. She is nice and polite, but, she has her ducks in order ---and isn't likely to take any guff or put up with any insulting presumptions. Read that: incoming stovepipe.
From Flags:
I and those around me follow the law and most of them are old and some very old and hidden from most. Arbitration in its common law form developed in England; in the Middle Ages, in tribunals such as the Courts of the Boroughs. Courts became suspicious of arbitration; for example, in Kill v. Hollister (1746), an English court ruled that the arbitration agreement could 'oust' courts of law and equity of jurisdiction. Arbitration was common in the early United States, with George Washington serving as an arbiter on an occasion. And the Arbitration process has been used ever since. However, its been used mostly by the selfserving impostors.
From Anna:
"Arbitration" is Law-by-Contract, and it doesn't work unless there is an Arbitration Clause built into the contract to begin with.
Trying to enforce a one-sided arbitration results in attempted unilateral contracting process, which is why none of these numerous "successful" arbitration actions work.
Both the people bringing the issue and the people issuing the judgment didn't check: (1) the status and standing of the Claimant relative to the Claim; (2) the existence of an Arbitration Clause in the contract; (3) the proper jurisdiction of the Law being addressed, which must match the jurisdiction which the Claimant is claiming.
Phil loses on all three counts.
As I keep trying to tell you, as far as law is concerned, there are no living men in the international jurisdiction of the sea, nor in the global jurisdiction of the air ---either one.
So Phil has an unenforceable arbitration award and you are trying to make yourselves out to be Great Sages.
For the record:
Arbitration only works and exists in the realm of contract law.
So here is Phil Hudok, claiming to be a living man owed all his rights, using a process of contract law that only applies to corporations and officers of corporations, that is, to Persons, and trying to apply it to a contract that has no arbitration clause applicable to him. Brilliant. Simply brilliant.
Why don't you all stop embarrassing yourselves? It only gets worse from here on.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.
  

46 comments:

  1. The only constitutional statuses are US citizen, State citizen, and American national. All come with contractual obligations and privileges. There is really no such thing as national, state national. Private law for remedy is from the beginning of the country. Read the contracts and real status, standing, character, condition and capacity and jurisdiction, venue and law form utilized therein.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does "constitutional" include The Articles of Confederation? ......... If so then is the "free inhabitant" also a status that is based on: "the free inhabitants of each of these States ... shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States"? .........
      Thank You!
      -

      Delete
    2. goodboots: troll-verified TruthTellerOctober 11, 2019 at 9:15 AM

      Very helpful information Veto.
      Thank you so much!

      "The only constitutional statuses are US citizen, State citizen, and American national."

      This makes all of those statuses:
      1. CONTRACTUAL statuses;
      2. that have to be entered into lawfully under LAWFUL CONTRACT;
      3. which did not happen (for most of us).

      And further, the Constitution is only a *CLAIMED* contract.

      It was not ratified by the people whose consent is necessary and so, it does not pertain to, and cannot lawfully be applied to, the living people on the actual land and soil.

      And it was not PASSED either.

      That gives IT the status ONLY of a *CLAIMED* contract with no actual proof of claim yet entered into the Public Records. Ever.

      That is, apparently, why it is said to have been "ADOPTED".

      But you can't "ADOPT" a contract! lol!!

      Contracts have to be willingly ENTERED INTO!!
      And you certainly can't ADOPT a contract "for" someone else.
      Most especially not when the contract you say you are ADOPTING "for" them makes them a SLAVE...YOURS!!

      This is the kind of nincompoopism we are dealing with. These are the nincompoops who want to tell you what you can and can't do, when,where,andhow, who you are, how much of your own private property you *get* to use...and so forth,...oh! and "charge" you for their "services".
      (I was not calling *you* a nincompoop Veto.)

      Anyway, this so-called "ADOPTED" contract, "the Constitution", would only be with our, the peoples', lawfully-ratified federal States of the Union (Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union) and NOT AT ALL a PRIVATE COMMERCIAL CONTRACT with us, the *people* who are living men and women!

      (They knew this!
      Which is why they had to come up with the Birth Certificate scam and other scams.
      They know we are sovereigns-in-fact. (...and-in law and -in nature.) )

      And here's why:
      We, the living, cannot contract with the dead--
      which the corporations or monarchies and so forth are. They are all dead FICTIONS. We need an intermediary and that intermediary is our Confederated States of the Union.

      Delete
    3. goodboots: troll-verified TruthTellerOctober 11, 2019 at 9:43 AM

      The living and the dead cannot be mingled.

      We, the living, need an intermediary to stand between us, in order to deal with dead entity corporations; and that intermediary standing between us is the lawfully-ratified States of the Confederated Union that our grandfathers created that still stands today and has never been dissolved.
      I am convinced that our precious grandfathers and mothers knew EXACTLY what they were doing and EXACTLY who they were dealing with! Read the mid-section of the DeclarofIndep, it sounds almost exactly like what is going on today!

      They knew what we were going to be faced with today because they were being put through it then AND THEY PUT ALL OF OUR RIGHTS, STATUSES, AND PROPERTY into an AMERICAN (not English/British /Roman/ Ecclesiastical/ Municipal/ Land/ Soil/Air/ Water/ Military//Commercial /Contractual/ CQV/ or other) Trust, but into an AMERICAN traditional common law trust for us, to protect us; and that is the Declaration of Independence THAT CANNOT BE TOUCHED BY FICTIONS, "Royalty", other common law or Common Law or any other venues, authorities, pervues, "jurisdictions"/other; by Foreign Sovereigns or sovereigns --whether in or out of nature, law, fact, or other; or any others; and is solely and exclusively within the lawful pervue/authority of the true and living, lawful American state nationals from whose own inherent authority it lawfully stands forever.
      May our blessed grand mothers and fathers rest in peace forever in our creator's divine presence. And so it is.

      Delete
    4. Poor Godel, rumor has it that after his breaking open the bounds of "mathematics" he read the "constitution" and discovered it's fail point.

      Godel's life thereafter turned inward, he curled up into a fetal ball and withered away.

      https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/
      Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems
      First published Mon Nov 11, 2013; substantive revision Tue Jan 20, 2015

      "Gödel's two incompleteness theorems are among the most important results in modern logic, and have deep implications for various issues. They concern the limits of provability in formal axiomatic theories. The first incompleteness theorem states that in any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of arithmetic can be carried out, there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F. According to the second incompleteness theorem, such a formal system cannot prove that the system itself is consistent (assuming it is indeed consistent). These results have had a great impact on the philosophy of mathematics and logic. There have been attempts to apply the results also in other areas of philosophy such as the philosophy of mind, but these attempted applications are more controversial..."

      Delete
    5. You think I kidding?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_G%C3%B6del

      "....On December 5, 1947, Einstein and Morgenstern accompanied Gödel to his U.S. citizenship exam, where they acted as witnesses. Gödel had confided in them that he had discovered an inconsistency in the U.S. Constitution that could allow the U.S. to become a dictatorship.

      ...Later in his life, Gödel suffered periods of mental instability and illness. He had an obsessive fear of being poisoned; he would eat only food that his wife, Adele, prepared for him. Late in 1977, she was hospitalized for six months and could subsequently no longer prepare her husband's food. In her absence, he refused to eat, eventually starving to death.[31] He weighed 29 kilograms (65 lb) when he died. His death certificate reported that he died of "malnutrition and inanition caused by personality disturbance" in Princeton Hospital on January 14, 1978.[32] He was buried in Princeton Cemetery. Adele's death followed in 1981."

      Delete
    6. From Anna:

      Sorry. I wish people were not so ignorant, but.... We all acquire "nationality" at birth, whether you like it or not. We are State Nationals at birth. Period.


      We can then adopt State Citizenship or not, but if we don't we don't have a functioning government. You can't self-govern if you refuse to do the job.


      And as for the two species of US Citizen/citizen those are built into the Constitutions to allow the Service Providers to live here among us and still maintain their ties to the King and the Pope, respectively.


      Arbitration has been here a LOT longer than the foundations of this country. It began when two cavemen turned to a third caveman to help settle their differences. That said, it has its limits.


      Arbitration can only be done in the realm of contract law. And there has to be an applicable arbitration clause in the contract from the beginning. And then, the one bringing the claim has to have the political status and standing to exercise the arbitration clause and the Arbitrator has to have the status and standing to hear the case and render a decision.


      So if Hudok is seen as a man, it's a split jurisdiction case and nobody in DC including the Supreme Court is competent to handle that.


      If he isn't seen as a man, it's an international jurisdiction case and he is acting as a British Territorial United States Citizen standing under the King's Law--- which is what Hudok and his buddies admit.


      Since these knotheads won't correct their political status, they don't have access to the status of "Lawful Person" ---which would require both status correction AND acceptance of State Citizenship.


      That is the only other option and Phil didn't do that.


      In summary:


      We know for sure that nobody in DC (or in the whole federal system) can decide a split jurisdiction case. So exclude that possibility.


      We know that Hudok didn't correct his political status and he admits himself that he is standing under the King's Law, so he can only be acting as a Legal Person -- and a British Legal Person at that. Since when is the King subject to arbitration? Show me the clause and show me Phil Hudok's standing to exercise it?


      The only other option would be for him to correct his political status and stand as a State Citizen and Lawful Person---and bring suit to enforce the Constitutional Guarantees as an American, but we know he didn't do that. And that would not be a subject for Arbitration because even then, he would be an American standing under the King's Law.


      So-- having cut to the chase there is no way to lawfully or legally enforce such an arbitration award, because either the claimant doesn't have standing , or the Arbitrator doesn't have standing, one way or the other, no matter how you sort it out.


      And as JAG has confirmed there are hundreds if not thousands of such arbitrations on record, none of which have paid out, because as I just explained (again) they are not enforceable.


      The only People who can enforce the Constitutions are State Citizens and they can only do it en masse through their State Government, because the States are the only actual Parties to the Constitutions.

      Delete
    7. goodboots: troll-verified TruthTellerOctober 11, 2019 at 7:49 PM

      Well we're not ignorant Anna! At least not all of us. Many, and many more coming on board all the time, have realized that the information in your articles often seems so "sketchy" and poorly researched that, hell, not only do we not dare to trust it, but it seems like a lot more of us all the time are either just skipping your articles altogether or skim-reading a few paragraphs and then going right to the comments section where we know we will read information that is, at least verifiable!!

      Delete
    8. goodboots: troll-verified TruthTellerOctober 11, 2019 at 8:01 PM

      Wasn't Anna just telling everybody to go to arbitration?
      And now:
      "And as JAG has confirmed there are hundreds if not thousands of such arbitrations on record, none of which have paid out, because as I just explained (again) they are not enforceable."

      Isn't Anna going to be responsible for losses?

      I'm pretty sure that would constitute a lawful claim in American traditional common law authority.

      Delete
    9. Well just as I said I barely even read the articles or I would have commented on this falsehood already. Whether they are enforceable or not is nuanced. This again illustrates what I already mentioned and you just mentioned above her sketchy info is poorly researched. You can sell these settlements and people use them for tax deduction and what not and other purposes and you can use the local sheriff to help you collect and you can put liens on people's property. Just like the corporations we can't force anyone to pay or have a debtors prison but there are ways to collect what is owed to you if you know what you are doing which obviously Anna doesn't. Commercial Liens are a very effective means of forcing people to do things you want lawfully done even if they don't want to. You can stop their ability to bond (sign for loans and do business in numerous ways), this should be some 101 knowledge for people learning about this stuff

      Delete
    10. Generally if I point out too many false statements in her articles my comment gets deleted so I don't bother picking them apart anymore

      Delete
    11. >And then, the one bringing the claim has to have the political status and standing to exercise the arbitration clause

      100% provably no question false

      Delete
    12. >The only People who can enforce the Constitutions are State Citizens

      Also 100% false and misleading. I don't know how many other ways to say your rights are in a LIEN able. You cannot sign them away with any contract ever, you never lost this status, you simply picked up a new status to go with it and can be whichever you want whenever you want by simply enforcing it in the proper manner

      Delete
    13. Point of fact here is link to one of the websites and you can find many more jewgling "sell judgments"

      https://www.judgmentmarketplace.com

      Delete
    14. Stopping someones ability to bond mans it makes their signature worthless to do business with btw and I have step by step instructions on how to put liens on people, judges, presidents and yes even Queens and Popes

      Delete
    15. One last thing arbitration is the case itself aka litigation, you cannot collect on an arbitration because this doesn't even make sense. You arbitrate/litigate to come to a settlement/judgment which is what you collect on. You gotta first at least know the terms of what you are talking about.

      Delete
  2. Anna you embarass yourself by responding to people (the Flags) who are so lacking in specific knowledge of the history and laws of the nation, please do not lower yourself to answering statements that are so loose and lacking substance that they are foolish on their face and in the rambling confusions of their statements. They are acting as distraction plants of some outside interlopers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anna you lied about the Continental Marshals - you claimed they were up and running in every state, This is not true. You claimed they were sinking their teeth into many criminalities and working with the defector Sheriffs etc.. This is not true. Why do have to lie and inflate everything as if your going to be reprimanded or lose self acclaimed Tokyo Fiduciary Rose status?. Its just not lady like to lie when we are dealing with the cost of human lives and Country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andrew, Im glad you brought this back up. We called Anna on this when she first mentioned it a week or so ago, and she refused to defend her self, as we knew already it was a big LIE. People ought to learn from this - if she lied about this, and its obvious, then how do they know any of her claims are true. Yet we have some very blind folks who just find it easier to just believe her, so they wont have to actually think.

      Anyone who IS a continental marshall......come step up and say so. (lets not hold our breath of course,lol)

      Delete
    2. Anna spins a lot of yarns and does a lot of fibbing and propagating of misinformation it is sad more people don't see this. I come here to chat with people and spread a little knowledge/links/info in the comments but mainly disregard most of what Anna writes about because she only knows just enough to sound convincing to people that don't understand the things she writes about that she knows what she is talking about.

      Her entire premise is filing unnecessary and pointless paperwork to correct a non-existent problem so everything after that is obviously gonna be suspect since it is built on a foundation of sand that shows a gross and fundamental misunderstanding of the $hit she writes about.

      Delete
  4. Folks, we all have our imperfections, but Anna has tons of knowledge in Laws. Everybody assumes and presumes all the time, every day.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Her entire premise is filing unnecessary and pointless paperwork to correct a non-existent problem so everything after that is obviously gonna be suspect since it is built on a foundation of sand that shows a gross and fundamental misunderstanding of the $hit she writes about so I have to disagree. She can regurgitate things she has read with very little understanding outside of that, she is fallen into a lot of traps and myths she hasn't properly researched to properly understand so she pushes as much bad information as she does decent information

      Delete
  5. Phil Hudock is challenging and won award for the way the corporation managers are mismanaging the trust to which we are parties (beneficiaries) to. Their "contract" applies to him and each one of us American inhabitants, personally. Quit making it a legalese issue, Anna. Only men and women can write and enforce these agreements. But let's get on to more useful subjects than flag officers, like Z-tag enforcement, and how discharging debt works, and exactly why we must pass through a documentary gauntlet. "Are your papers in order?" (Said the brown-shirt.) Otherwise, like Ecclesiastes said, "All is vanity."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Happy Camper I agree onZ-tag enforcement & how discharging debt works. Add how to get our Alodiall (spelling?) titles to Auto and Land?

      Delete
    2. goodboots: troll-verified TruthTellerOctober 11, 2019 at 7:37 AM

      Jasun,
      You might check out:
      Alloidal Titles are still Titled "res"/things and, therefore, are still attached to the "King"...by having a Title in them. (?)

      I'm pretty sure but not positive, that what we will want is our Land Patents since we are sovereigns-in-fact and -in-law and are Foreign Sovereigns to all "Kings" and others.

      I have not yet done a deep dive into this info, so, as I said, not sure, but that is what I have in my 'scribble notes' that I want to look further into.

      If you research this, would you please share your info? Thanks!

      Delete
    3. Anna published on the public record an instruction titled 'Land Grab" Here as i understand it she is not helping us gain rightful ownership to our land as free men and wemon but transfering it from one false entity/flag/feduciary to another (hers). We are free people yet they are still treating us as if we are slaves..... being transfered from one slave onwner to the next without full disclosure and without our consent. (Maybe becasue we are still acting as slaves).?

      In my view, Anna want us to believe she is doing us a great service by volunteering herself ( without our consent to be our leader/Governer/Feduciary/Head of state. NO Way- I vote her out becasue as one of the people i never voted her in.

      She is trying to build a government without deriving its just power from the consent of the governed/people; How is this any more than being transfered form one slave owner/ Tyranical Government/ Satanic Government/Brittish Oligarchy/ Vatacin/Holy SEE to the next self proclained slave owner?

      If she was voted in to repesent our people and our country she would have to be willing and be able to demonstraight her full support of the "Declaration of Independence and must give full disclosure of all she claims to be doing , proof of these claims and all she claims to have allready done on behalf of the people , and finally she would have to be willing to pledge her life, fortune, and sacred honor just like the like the 56 Men who signed the "Declaration of Independence" (soldiers of true God) who were driven, endowed,and Governed by their Creator, my creator YAHWEH!

      In every stage of our Oppressions and enslavement as Gods People we have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble Terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated Injury. Therefore let us gather togeather in great numbers and put faith in NO Man or Woman for We cannot and shall not serve two Masters.

      Delete
    4. >In every stage of our Oppressions and enslavement as Gods People we have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble Terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated Injury. Therefore let us gather togeather in great numbers and put faith in NO Man or Woman for We cannot and shall not serve two Masters.

      Well you have a point here I commonly make, you aren't gonna win this filing paperwork, not a total victory, not in the kali Yuga. It can only be won with armed rebellion most likely if you want to fix it all because most people just aren't smart enough to understand this stuff and even more of them don't even care. Their ignorance puts us all at risk so though it is fun to role play and pretend that Anna is doing anything of value the truth is she is just publishing fairy tales and false hope. I suggest just learning as much as you can and preparing yourself and taking care of your own issues by learning common law and how the system really works. Only when enough people do that and are putting enough challenges in to the system can any hope of reform be made and you are racing against the clock, the dark forces have all the keys to all the doors and working nonstop to collapse the systems themselves to prevent you from doing that, we are in the 9th inning as it were already but the tide is turning so don't lose hope :).

      How To Destroy America In 8 Easy Steps
      http://esotericawakening.com/how-to-destroy-america-in-8-easy-steps-dick-lamm-2005



      Delete
    5. Bodhi, You are RAD MAN! Love your Above Average IQ. You would make a great leader. I agree that "Whenever ANY form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the PEOPLE to Alter or Abolish it." The Declaration of Independence" I feel we are in the final Global Super Bowel and it is 4th Quarter 4th down with seconds remaining... Great Days to be Alive to Bear Witness. Take Care and let me know when your ready to Assemble.

      Delete
    6. Ty my friend same to you. You can email me if you want I have a personal discord server where people that understand this kind of stuff discuss things if you would like to join email me at bodhi.karma98@gmail.com. Blessings my friend

      Delete
    7. In various other ways,I have also stated that it appears to me that Anna is trying to form her own government, elicits donations from gullible followers, while at the same time has NEVER given an Update or Report of Progress, tho some of us have often asked for Progress Reports up to date. But none has EVER come forth from her and this has been over a period of several years.

      We dont even know where the sudden $60,000 came from; its a rather important question that should be answered, otherwise we have to wonder who she is really dealing with, what favor is expected in return for such a hefty ''donation' for a worthless trip to the vati-Can, which we will never hear results of, either.

      Delete
    8. Well I have only been following a few months bit it didn't take me long to see she wasn't very well informed and doing an awful lot of grandstanding and "international woman of intrigue" that read like some bad spy novel

      Delete
    9. Reply to Veto from Anna:

      More ignorant bullshit. I just spent four days in Texas with Ron Gibson who has dedicated his life to explaining how you can get your land patents back, and after that, your freeholds. And he understands that without us --- including me --- standing up and sticking a fork into things, your land and soil would already be gone.


      The soil is under the jurisdiction of our actual counties and the land is under the jurisdiction of our States, but so long as you stupidly insist on standing under the King's Law and acting as a British Territorial United States Citizen, or even worse, a Municipal "citizen of the United States" ---- you have no land rights and no soil rights and no constitutional guarantees at all.


      Those of us who woke up early entered into the "vacated offices" and began rebuilding and repopulating our actual Government. Those who are deceived and deluded continue to think that that THING in Washington, DC, is the American Government ---- when it objectively and provably, is not.


      We re-issued our Sovereign Letters Patent in 2015 founded on The Unanimous Declaration of Independence published July 4, 1776, so that goes to show how much you know about the price of tea in China.


      The plain fact is that you are making a lot of spurious unjustifiable "assumptions" ---- a process which leads to making many mistakes and many false statements.


      And as for "voting" the actual capacity of Americans is as "electors" ----- not "voters". If you are still "voting" you are acting as a British Territorial or Municipal Citizen and nothing I am doing has any effect upon you, except that if you don't wake up and support what I am doing, you will find yourself living under the Spanish Inquisition as a slave.


      Wake to hell up.

      Delete
    10. >More ignorant bullshit. I just spent four days in Texas with Ron Gibson who has dedicated his life to explaining how you can get your land patents back, and after that, your freeholds. And he understands that without us --- including me --- standing up and sticking a fork into things, your land and soil would already be gone.

      I have see some of his presentations he knows his business when it comes to land patents but he is as lost as you are Anna when it comes to common law.

      >And he understands that without us --- including me --- standing up and sticking a fork into things, your land and soil would already be gone.

      I lol'd. What have either of you done that has kept anyone from losing their homes? I imagine there are probably a few cases Ron can point to and say he helped them personally but acting like you did anything to help America as a whole is absolutely delusional self aggrandizing. I never like to put people down for no reason and I like to give credit where credit is due to people who put in the work and know people take, take take without even a kind work to those who have done a lot of work for them for nothing in return.

      I believe you have helped a lot of people through your writing wake up to the fraud being perpetrated I imagine and give you credit for that but you only on the surface level. You got them looking and paying attention is all you did because you barely understand most of the things you write about yourself and are just falt out wrong on crucial aspects of these things that makes your entire approach flawed and invalid. Claiming you helped people save their home and land is laughably absurd. You think the banks and government were gonna come in just muscle people out of their house but they decided not to because they were afraid of big Anna and her blog posts? Wew, this is some disturbing levels of delusions of grander.

      Delete
    11. >Those of us who woke up early entered into the "vacated offices" and began rebuilding and repopulating our actual Government. Those who are deceived and deluded continue to think that that THING in Washington, DC, is the American Government ---- when it objectively and provably, is not.

      This is 101 Anna I doubt anyone leaving comments here doesn't understand the corporate frauds posing as the legitimate government are just crafty counterfeits. Bringing this up in every single article and comment makes you look like a one trick pony with no further knowledge beyond this entry level understanding.

      >We re-issued our Sovereign Letters Patent in 2015 founded on The Unanimous Declaration of Independence published July 4, 1776, so that goes to show how much you know about the price of tea in China.

      The price of tea in China is this was pointless and served no purpose so it doesn't strengthen your argument it shows you are incompetent.

      >The plain fact is that you are making a lot of spurious unjustifiable "assumptions" ---- a process which leads to making many mistakes and many false statements.

      Actually Anna this describes your articles and comments to a tee

      >If you are still "voting" you are acting as a British Territorial or Municipal Citizen

      Only when you vote, no other time if you don't choose too. I tell you over and over how this really works but you don't seem to get it. You can put this persona on like a pair of clothes and take it off like a pair of clothes as well whenever you want to wear a different (sovereign) persona.

      >if you don't wake up and support what I am doing, you will find yourself living under the Spanish Inquisition as a slave.

      I lol'd hard, secret agent Anna on the case if not for you and your paperwork at the clerk's office no one has read all of our armed forces and police and militias etc would have all turned on their own families and neighbors and rounded them all up for some bankers and politicians to put in the tower of London eh? Do you really believe this Anna? If you do you are dangerously out of touch with reality.

      Please respond to me directly on these points Anna I would enjoy a person to person conversation for your readers. Perhaps I will even call into your show to help you understand some of these issues better if you like.

      Delete
  6. 8 usc 1101 (a)21:(21) "The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state." Man, is this one loaded with traps. If you view this on the Legal Information Institute you can click on underlined words. First, "person" we all know what that is. Next, "state." Interestingly, the Legal Institute gives the definition for state as State which is:(36) The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. No states of the union there. Is it an incorrect definition? Using plain English we can be sure that state refers to "a nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government," if not otherwise defined. So "state' as referred to in 1101 means any organized political community. Is the Legal Institute trying to mislead the reader?

    Next, "allegiance." Why would the creator of a thing pledge allegiance to his own creation? Better to call yourself an American than a state national.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would the Organization of American States be something to look at, the OAS?

      I think you would need to look at regionalism as well, no?

      http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/regionalism/sneaking.htm

      Just some information sharing, hope it helps

      Delete
    2. goodboots: troll-verified TruthTellerOctober 11, 2019 at 12:01 PM

      Rog,
      Thanks for the info. Great.
      That is right then, according to their "Legal" definitions -- that I don't understand because I don't understand BAR ENGLISH.

      But we are correcting our status and it looks like we have to enter their "jurisdiction" just temporarily in order to make the correction to the erroneous Registrations, -- at least to Cancel All Powers of Attorney. So we would definitely do well to be careful.

      I have put in my papers that the only language I understand, speak, or write is Common American *language* (NOT "English") and I do not understand BAR English or any other language.

      But still, for the purpose of "political status", it can't hurt to get the right wording.

      I'm actually I thinking that since I am not interested in becoming a State citizen or whatever its called at this time, that actually, my correct political status might be: "a free, sovereign, and independent woman natural-born on the land and soil commonly called [for example] virginia the state and miller the county." I saw that someone had referred to their state and county that way, but Capitalized the State and County names.


      Just thinking out loud here...
      And would love to have your or others' educated opinions on the following:

      How about with something added about States of the Union/Confederated Union?

      I'm definitely going to look into adding an Extension to my Correction papers.

      Delete
    3. goodboots: troll-verified TruthTellerOctober 11, 2019 at 12:07 PM

      Rog, the allegiance issue,:

      I make it clear that I am a living being with a soul and that the land and soil belongs to me and I do not belong to the land and soil.

      That harkens all the way back to the very beginning: Para,#1: DeclofIndep.

      Delete
    4. Make it clear to who? If you don't know how to do it in court what you say in the comments of a blog doesn't matter lol and no amount of paperwork is gonna change this either. You declare these kinds of things in the proper format in your arguments in your court documents if and when you need to /period end of discussion. Everything else is hot air and wishful thinking

      Delete
  7. Governments frown upon "stateless" people. But, this is backasswords. In order for a "state" to exist, there must first be people with a common culture, values, a defined border, etc. This comes first and may be called a "nation." Any political body is a result of that. So the people of a nation comprise a polity, common interests and beliefs. A polity precedes a state. A state is the expression of the polity. To manage the "state's" affairs, the people create a government.

    For a government to call someone stateless according to its goofy rules, they would have to accuse you of having no place to live. Unless you are a hobo this accusation is patently untrue and upside down. It is not you that has to prove anything. You live in a certain place and your ties to that place, the land and people of that place establish you as one of the people of a nation then state.

    Of course, governments have to know who is part of a nation so they know who they serve and who they don't. Your response is that you are living Man or Woman who is a part of a nation by virtue of your ties to the land and people within a defined area, Ohio, for example.

    Government doesn't like this arrangement and so they turn it upside down so that you are at the bottom of the hierarchy instead of the top. It demands you have political status in order to access it. But your political status is inherent in your ties to the land and people of a "nation." In other words, as Man or Woman who lives somewhere and wants to live there, your political status is properly "creator." Governments hate this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow very insightful comment here, the real deal ty

      Delete
    2. goodboots: troll-verified TruthTellerOctober 11, 2019 at 5:08 PM

      Rog,

      I know this is jumping pretty deep into the rabbit tunnel, so no need to answer unless you want to as your four paragraphs are well-written and very easy to understand...Its just me wanting to learn everything I can about all of this, even the details...I have a feeling it's going to be very important soon.

      Your Para#1:
      I'm thinking [Para#1 DofI] question: you ARE part of a nation/ polity because that is NOT fiction, and can be,---even without being part of/or participating in the fictional construct called the "state" that the nation you are part of created?

      [For example, if you are living in the woods and you only usually go to town for supplies and so forth, then theoretically you could be part of that actual nation w/out being part of/participating in the fictional state it created?]

      Would that be what they call a freeman? freeman-on-the -land?
      This is where one is entirely free, sovereign, and independent, isnt it? With no "fictional government"/"State".
      But you, yourself, your family are living peacefully (unless you're attacked, and then you pound 'em :) ) -- under the laws of nature and of natures creator, causing no one harm to anyone and providing entirely for yourself and your own,... BUT *still* connected to your nation/polity by the common interests and beliefs, the land and so forth?

      I'm thinking that is Para#1 of the DeclofIndep.
      And also that it would be referred to as a freeman.
      Not sure that's right though.
      ...........
      Then Para#2 DeclrofIndp would be the joining of yourselves, the nation of people/the polity together to create that "state" and the rules, regs & policies -- the "government."
      IYO, is that accurate?
      If no, where would you see it being off?

      Your Para#2 end
      "You live in a certain place and your ties to that place, the land and people of that place establish you as one of the people of a nation then state."

      So actually, [I think] that our place of nativity is always our nation of people unless we renounce it... So in other words we could have our nativity in virginia and travel to florida and even set up a dwelling in florida but we would still be a virginian unless we decided to renounce virginia and declare florida to be our nation/polity?
      But talking about being a hobo,... A tent or a cave is a dwelling, like a teepee or wigwam is a dwelling, but these "states" don't recognize a teepee-type of dwelling, it would have to be a permanent structure?

      I know this is getting super detailed, don't tax yourself answering! :)

      Why did you capitalize Man and Woman? Because your using it as a "political status" for the fiction/ created "state"?
      ........
      This is getting long. I'm going to stop.
      Thanks.

      Delete
    3. Just to point this out, check out the video by TROH show that claims that they did leave us all stateless
      https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3smFrsuykp5Mtx0rEhB-jQ
      Watch the first video that comes up and read it carefully
      Anna does not care for TROH but I think we need to look at everything, IMO

      Delete
    4. Look, the reason I brought all this up is to bring it all back to basics. The reason I capitalize Man and Woman is because we are made in the image and likeness of the Creator. To style it man or woman is to ignore that and, perhaps, attribute our existence to mere evolution or to some other origin (ALIENS!).

      As far as all the rest of that goes, it is simply to highlight the proper hierarchy. Their claims that we are stateless are without merit. They simply have nothing to stand on.

      As far as the arbitration goes, it appears to be an award to certain named people. Or as Bodhi points out, maybe it's to persons. These kinds of things are profoundly misguided. I don't know what Hudok's intentions really are, but it seems to be coming from a place of revenge.

      Delete
  8. >For the record:
    Arbitration only works and exists in the realm of contract law.
    So here is Phil Hudok, claiming to be a living man owed all his rights, using a process of contract law that only applies to corporations and officers of corporations, that is, to Persons, and trying to apply it to a contract that has no arbitration clause applicable to him. Brilliant. Simply brilliant.
    Why don't you all stop embarrassing yourselves? It only gets worse from here on.

    For the record pretty much all areas of common law is based on contracts what is embarrassing in my opinion is someone such as yourself claiming to have all this knowledge on this subject doesn't understand this.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.