Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 5100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Thursday, February 27, 2020

Prosecute the Prosecutor


By Anna Von Reitz

Day after day I get these pitiful letters and emails. It's some helpless widow, a great-grandma like me, and the vermin have got hold of her by some ruse, and now they are shaking her down like terriers shaking a rat. And now, at the 11th hour, the victims come seeking help.
It's impossible --- literally --- for me to get involved in all the court actions. I can give you generalized information and pointers and hope that you are listening, bearing in mind that every case and situation is different. I can give you my insights into the common mistakes that are made.
Your first job is to declare and record your proper political status. It should be done now, before one of these courts even starts to address you. It will stand as evidence of who you are and in what capacity you are acting. This is like ammo stored up for hunting season.
Your second job is to join your State Assembly and take up the work of an active State Citizen. Why is this important? Because there is strength in numbers and deliverance from this tyranny in your own hands. Once you fill your jury pools and elect your Sheriffs and Justices of the Peace, the foreign courts are obligated to step down and not address you, unless you actually and factually stray into their very limited foreign jurisdictions.
That said, the most common mistakes made when interacting with these felons is that we don't state our counterclaims and counteroffers from the get-go, and we don't prosecute their Prosecutors.
The Prosecutor thinks its his job to prosecute you, but in fact, by addressing you, he has made it your job to prosecute him.
He is the one bringing any complaint against you, so he is the one you have to cross-examine and bring your firepower to bear on ---- and most of the time, he's just a dumb schmuck doing what he has been trained to do by rote.
In order to effectively and efficiently nail a Prosecutor, you have to hone your ability to ask pointed questions, bearing in mind that you can never get into trouble in a court room by politely asking questions.
"Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT a person?"
uh, uh, ummmm….
"Mr. Prosecutor.... can you explain to the Court exactly what kind of person the DEFENDANT is?"
Uh, uh, ummmm….
"Mr. Prosecutor....you have used an unusual style convention to name the DEFENDANT in all capital letters ---- is the DEFENDANT's NAME written in Latin or something made to appear like Latin?"
Uh, well, uh, I …. no, that's just the way we do it, uh....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... were you aware that writing the DEFENDANT's name in all capital letters has a meaning indicating that the DEFENDANT is either a dead man's estate, a corporation, or a trademark?"
Umm-uh, I never heard anything like that...
"Mr. Prosecutor.... may we let the record show the Chicago Manuel of Style attributes meaning to the use of all capital letters to name the DEFENDANT on page.... (give your citation and edition, etc.)?
Well, uh, I, we-uh, I mean I was unaware....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT a trademark?"
Uh, no, not that I know of....
Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT dead?"
Uh, uh, oh-uh, well, uh....
Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT a corporation?
Uh-duh, wha--uh....
[If he admits that it is...] "Mr. Prosecutor.... what kind of corporation is the DEFENDANT?"
Ah, ah, ah.....
"Mr. Prosecutor, what evidence do you have that the DEFENDANT exists?"
I-uh, we-uh, well-uh.....
"Mr. Prosecutor, can you please bring your evidence demonstrating probable cause that the DEFENDANT exists and submit this evidence on the Public Record of the Court....?
Aye, aye, uh, cough, cough, blanch...
"Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT allowed to do business in this state?"
Bhelf, uh, oh, uh....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... is the DEFENDANT being represented by a Board of Directors?"
Oh, uh,.....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... if you had a problem with the DEFENDANT, why didn't you address your charges to the Board of Directors or the CEO of the corporation?"
uh-uh-uh-uh....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... what I am trying to get to is, why is this DEFENDANT being sent mail to my mailing address?"
Buh, wuh, I-uh, well, isn't it obvious....?
"Mr. Prosecutor.... where is the probable cause that I have anything to do with the DEFENDANT---other than having a somewhat similar name?"
Ah, well, uh...
"Mr. Prosecutor... are you aware that the DEFENDANT's name has appeared as a Traded Security and brokerage account?"
um, um, um, um-ah....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... you have named this DEFENDANT and sent mail (or process servers or officers) addressed to it at my address, is that not true?
Well, uh, yes, I suppose that occurred... uh...
"Mr. Prosecutor.... you are obviously aware that I am not an incorporated entity and not a Traded and Bonded Security, either, correct?"
Of course, not... I can see that... uh....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... can you please provide the Court and submit to the Public Record any evidence that you have amounting to probable cause for you to think that the DEFENDANT is connected to me or voluntarily represented by me in any capacity?
Ah, ah,....
"Mr. Prosecutor.... can you demonstrate and explain to the court exactly why you addressed this DEFENDANT in this manner?"
Well, yes. It's required by our style guidelines....
"Mr. Prosecutor.....
You see my point. Once you fully grasp what the Person/PERSON they are addressing really is, you can run laps around them and reduce them to blithering idiots in front of a judge on this one point alone, because (1) most of them don't know what they are doing or why, they have just been trained to "do it this way" and (2) they have been caught in something that is obviously shady, and (3) for those who do know the scam, they can't admit it, can they? So they wind up looking completely incompetent.
"I move the court to dismiss for failure to state a case, failure to identify the nature and identities of the Parties being addressed, and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."
Put yourself in the guise of an investigator, someone who has landed in this peculiar World of Oz environment of the courtroom, and Mr. Prosecutor is the one person in the room who is obligated to answer all your questions about the whole circumstance, because that's what he is.
He is the one bringing charges, so it is his job to know who or what the DEFENDANT is, and everything else about the circumstance. It is his burden of proof to support everything he says and does.
So, batten up, and role play with each other. Now you know the game and it is just a matter of asking them questions they can't or won't answer.
Learn to make everything into a question and learn to recognize and rebut their language cues --- for example, you may address them as "Mr." but never let them address you using such a title.
They may say that you are a "resident" of whatever town or county or state; always "take exception" to this. You don't reside anywhere or maintain a "residence" in any fictional State of State. You have a house and you live in your State. Period.
The identity and nature of the DEFENDANT is just one small point that you can and should drill home. I've seen Prosecutors run from courtrooms after four or five such pointed questions. Very few of them will let it get down to any discussion of the actual meaning and use of DOG LATIN, because it is damaging to the court and to their own professional credentials.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

5 comments:

  1. Let's persecute the public record officers & clerks, especially the older ones, for giving their young clerks bad advice to railroad, conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, and forcing us follow their FOREIGN corporate codes. Lying that their codes are real State laws.

    18 U.S. Code § 2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally...

    They've been warned since 2017, and they kept making new rules to not records our public records.

    These employees of ours think they are our bosses.

    Injunction permitted, let's tie them to our Property Theft, UCC rule, and International laws. Their ignorance is not a defense. We cannot take their apologetic excuses, after 154 years of abuses. They got to have a minimum brain, to work in any logical offices.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Anna, Great job ! I have had some more information handed to me today after all these years that will be like the corona virus on steroids for these muni courts. we have a meeting on Saturday on Sunday I will pass of the bomb. Father is good I pray for His wisdom ,understanding and knowledge everyday and He gives it to me liberally He tells us we have not because we ask not. I hate missing out on His promises after all what else is there really? Man's understanding ? In His Service Michael Blessings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ive tried to tell everyone that the answer to winning in court is to " ask " questions either to the judge or to the prosecutor...!! But the judge rarely lets you ask questions to the prosecutor...!! If you do they try and interfere with a "motions illuminanii" , meaning that what you are asking is to dangerous to the courts actions...!!
    But in any case , we need to make our counterclaim stick and put these prosecutors in jail..!! How exactly do we do this when the courts do whatever they want..!! Thats why they call them kankaroo courts..!!

    You can ask the judge or prosecutor about " subrogation" and your right to have the prosecutor sign a waiver, but that rarely works because the judge gets you offtrack by saying that is an insurance claim and isnt part of this hearing....in which case you can just say " great, than you agree with me that the prosecutor has failed to state a claim upon which rememdy cannot be had"...!! But still how do we put a prosecutor in jail since he/ she is automatically immune from prosecution..!! Otherwise no one would ever be a prosecutor...!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Does this court have jurisdiction over the man? Make them prove it. Once jurisdiction is challenged it must be proven.

    ReplyDelete
  5. WE LIKE THE SCRIPT. THANKS SO MUCH. MUCH APPRECIATED.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.