Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2500 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Friday, December 21, 2012

All "gun control" so called laws are Null and Void

There are NO valid gun control laws in the USA. They want you to believe those "laws" are valid and law for you and I to follow but they are NOT valid, NOT lawful and NOT in force.

How do I know that?   Just keep reading.

1.  Go to any search engine, like www.ixquick.com or www.google.com   and type in  dick act repealed.
You will see a whole page of articles on the Dick Act of 1902.  I am NOT talking about any act passed in 1903. This was the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654 
The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

I have found page after page on the internet that all essentially say the same thing.

Here are some links.

http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3949

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread483246/pg1

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/108957/DICK_ACT_of_1902_CANT_BE_REPEALED_GUN_CONTROL_FORBIDDEN/

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=151233

http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642

2. Then there is the principle that unconstitutional "laws" are null and void from their inception.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
The higher laws always prevail when there is a conflict between them. There never will be a conflict between positive divine law, and natural law.  They are.
1. Positive Divine Law
2. Natural Law
3. Human law   notice it is on the bottom and the least of all law. This includes all civil and criminal "laws" and even cannon law.
Whenever there is a conflict between any of these,  the higher laws are always to prevail in God's eyes and they do. 
3. The current government wants all jury trials to go away. They want their corrupt judges to try all cases without a jury. They have been working for years to discredit Juries.
YOU HAVE THE POWER TO NULLIFY (refuse to apply) any bad so called "laws" as an individual juror.  Yes, you have that power; it is real; it is now; and all you need to use it is the knowledge that you have that power.
Your jury rights are your most powerful rights. Instead of trying to avoid jury duty, you should be trying to get on every jury you can. That will give you ample opportunity to educate your fellow jurors about their right to nullify bad "laws". It will also get you into a position where you can (all by yourself without another person) nullify bad law by hanging the jury (refusing to apply the so called "law" to the case you are on).
If you don't believe me take a look at this.

http://www.juryrights.info

4. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy. 
The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.

5. The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
6. Then there is the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, which was passed and signed into law by Governor Schweitzer. 
http://www.wnd.com/2010/05/159485/

And this from Chuck Baldwin:
Pertaining specifically to the Second Amendment, the State of Montana, in particular, seems to have it all together. In anticipation of the recent Heller Supreme Court decision, a host of Montana's senators and representatives—along with its Secretary of State— proposed a resolution stating "that any 'collective rights' holding in D.C. v. Heller will violate Montana's compact with the United States, the contract by which Montana entered the Union in 1889."
The Montana resolution recalls, "When Montana entered into statehood and adopted the Compact as a part of the Montana Constitution in 1889, included was a provision guaranteeing the right to bear arms to 'any person.'"
The resolution continues, "To be clear, the wording of the right to bear arms reservation in the Montana constitution is exactly the same today as it was in 1884."
Furthermore, the Montana resolution says, "There is no question that the contract into which Montana entered for statehood was predicated upon an understanding that the people of Montana would benefit from an individual and personal right to bear arms, protected from governmental interference by both the federal and Montana constitutions. That was the clear intent of the parties to the contract."
The resolution ended by stating sternly, "A collective rights holding in Heller would not only open the Pandora's box of unilaterally morphing contracts, it would also poise Montana to claim appropriate and historically entrenched remedies for contract violation."
In other words, representatives and senators in the State of Montana unequivocally put Washington, D.C., on notice that it would not tolerate the infringement of its citizens' right to keep and bear arms. I don't think I'm reading anything into the resolution by assuming that they were implying that they would secede before they let the federal government trample their Second Amendment liberties. (Plus, I've just been told that New Hampshire may also be preparing to propose such a resolution.)
7. Then there is the original compact that Montana entered with the federal government when we became a state. No less than 2 Attorneys General and one Governor have warned the Feds that any abrogation of firearms freedom in Montana by the feds will result in the breaking of that compact, which in it's logical conclusion would (in my opinion) result in Montana no longer being a State of that federal union.
8. Then there is the ABSOLUTE natural law right to self defense. Your inalienable and individual right was always contained in the US Constitution, but was clarified in 2008 by the US Supreme Court.

How about this "what if" gun seizure scenrio?

And finally "The Coming Gun Grab"  received this morning from a Montana patriot  who will remain anonymous.
" I'm not worried about a successful gun confiscation program in America. I just don't know if enough Americans will have the guts to shoot the government thugs. That is the only relevant question regarding future gun control. On this point, I quote from a speech by the latte novelist Taylor Caldwell:
"I'm going to castigate all you men here for what you have done to America  - every mother's son of you.
How did we arrive at this disastrous hour in time? I will tell you. You men.... abdicated your manhood!
You deserted the Republic. Aristotle said two thousand and five hunred years ago: "Masculine republics decline into feminine democracies and democracies into despotism."  That is what has happened to America now. We call ourselves a free country. We are not free! Tomorrow the tyranny will be overt instead of covert as it is now.
Is there any hope? Well, only a little, and I;m afraid that few men will take advantage of it.  One: Challenge your government and, if you suffer for it, to hell with sweet peace.
TWO: FIGHT GUN CONTROL! It is your right to bear arms under the Constitution (THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND FOR GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW) but the tyrants want to take away your arms so you won't be able to offer any resistance to bayonets!
Gentlemen, you can restore your dead Republic. But be again the masters of your government and be again the masters of your women or will you meekly say: "Hail, Caeser, we who are about to die salute you."
(End quote from Tayler Caldwell)

Don't worry that they'll get your guns. Worry that you might NOT have the guts to use them. Will you let federal barbarians storm your neighborhood, breaking down doors - or will everybody on your block rain a torrent of copper-jacketed lead on these thugs? It's about to hit the fan - will you be courageous?

If you can't imagine -gasp!- defending your rights and your property and your family against the Government, then SELL YOUR GUNS TO A REAL MAN. Who are you fooling? You don't deserve a Zeiss-scoped Sako any more than a .22 Jennings.

Give up your guns now and spare yourself the embarrassment later. 
The 2nd Amendment is for men - not hobbyists.

And here is one of the best pledges I have ever read from a man that I know personally and who I absolutely believe will do exactly as he says:

My Personal Pledge of Resistance Against Any Attemp to Disarm Us by Means of an "Assault Weapons Ban"

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2012/12/19/my-personal-pledge-of-resistance-against-any-attemp-to-disarm-us-by-means-of-an-assault-weapons-ban/

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

1 comment:

  1. I had not seriously concidered moving back to Montana until I read your "work", recently.

    C. Storms is proud of you, I am sure.

    Keep up the "Good Work"!

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.