Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Claim Your Name and Estate -- the EZ Way


By Anna Von Reitz

Imagine the situation -- 

You are the heir of a vast fortune, but suddenly, you "disappear".  

(For the moment, we won't delve into how.) 

Your British Cousin, Bubba, says to himself --- "What ho!  No sense in letting all this property sit idle!  I have the keys to the boathouse and the mansion and cars and everything, so I will just move in and make myself at home in Cousin Joe's absence." 

So he does.  He settles his ample rump in your armchair, props his feet in front of your fire, and begins directing all sorts of business operations using your assets as collateral for his enterprises.  

He rents out your boat for ferrying and boat rides and sightseeing and makes a killing.  He buys another boat using your credit, and expands upon this business. The money is rolling in.  

He does the same thing with the mansion -- turns it into a B and B, rakes in the dough, then uses it as collateral for a loan to start a hotel chain.  Things are going great guns.
 

Cousin Bubba is rolling in it, wearing custom-tailored suits, sipping the very best Hair of the Dog, and having the time of his life---- but as time goes on, it all seems rather empty.  Boring.  So, he decides to have a little "fun" and up his profits some more.  

He starts running guns and drugs and other smuggled contraband using your boats.   Pretty soon he is in bed with a host of unsavory underworld characters doing all sorts of bad things, in your name, of course.  

Bit by bit, Bubba picks up some bad habits of his own.  He's not only running drugs, he is taking drugs.  He isn't just supplying arms, he is causing wars so he can sell and smuggle more.  He has become a soulless, addicted, dissolute rake, all based on his use and often, misuse, of your assets. 

Finally, it all catches up with Cousin Bubba.  The police catch on.  The soldiers catch on.  The other relatives wake up and begin questioning---- "What's Bubba up to?  Why is he claiming that Cousin Joe's stuff is his?" 

His creditors and all the people Bubba has harmed with his nefarious dealings come forward and sue him.  He is forced into bankruptcy, and everything that (almost) everyone now assumes is his, is put on the auction block to pay his debts. 

And at that exact moment, you stagger in and say--- "What is this?  That's my boat!  And my house!  And my ......." 

So just substitute "Cousin Bubba" with the "British Government" and  missing "Cousin Joe" with the actual "American Government" and you will have a very good idea what is going on here.  Substitute all the bewildered "relatives" with the other nations of the world, who basically know what Bubba has done, but don't know that "Joe" was missing and wasn't involved in this whole rampage at all. 

And now, what does all this mean for you, and how can you come home? 

Many of us already have.  We are operating the actual American Government -- the unincorporated United States of America, not USA, Inc. 

It basically comes down to this: the copyright to your Trade Name has not been recorded, it has only been registered (as chattel belonging to Bubba, which he borrowed against). 

To reclaim your Good Name, you need to go back and acknowledge, accept, and re-convey your Trade Name to the land jurisdiction of your birth (Deed of Re-conveyance), then your Common Law Copyright to your own name/NAMES and variations thereof, effective with the day you were born, and permanently domiciling your Name/Name on the land and soil of the state where you were born.

These two easily recorded documents correct your public records, so that you can be identified as Cousin Joe, and your assets can be held harmless and returned to you from the bankruptcy Slush Pile that Cousin Bubba is offering his creditors.  

The Deed of Re-Conveyance is just a simple statement to the effect:  "I acknowledge, accept, and permanently re-convey my lawful given Trade Name, (for example) John Michael Doe,  to the land and soil of Florida, where I was born, effective (for example) January 3, 1965,"  that you sign in front of a Notary Witness.   Attach the Common Law Copyright (example provided) as a separate "Extension" to the Deed of Re-Conveyance.  And you are done. 
http://annavonreitz.com/certificateofassumedname.pdf

If you want to be extremely explicit, you can additionally attach an Act of Expatriation as another "Extension" to the Deed of Re-Conveyance. 

"You" are now officially established and standing on the land jurisdiction of the sovereign State --- in the above case, --- Florida, and so are your various Names/NAMES which derive from your given Trade Name.  

As such, you are now recognizable as a Protected Person and as Cousin Joe, the Priority Creditor of Cousin Bubba, not just some unknown strange guy called Joe who looks kinda familiar.....

The bankruptcy Trustees have to dig your assets out of Bubba's bankruptcy and set them aside.  Notify The United States District Court for the District of Columbia,  US Bankruptcy Trustees, and send them certified copies (obtained at the time you record your documents) of your Re-Conveyance and Copyright.  Do this via Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested. 

We have tested this method of securing your name and estate and it has worked 100% of the time with much less muss and fuss than other methods, including methods we used ourselves in the past. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 700 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

191 comments:

  1. Trade Name to the land jurisdiction of your birth (Deed of Re-conveyance), then your Common Law Copyright to your own name/ where do I find this info to start this process Anna?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This method sounds a lot like what Robb Ryder was saying to do when i was studing foreclosures in 2014.

      Delete
    2. This method sounds a lot like what Robb Ryder was saying to do when i was studing foreclosures in 2014.

      Delete
    3. Also wondering if it is similar to Tim Turner's program. I did all those filings but it's been so long, I need to review. Anyone else familiar with what I'm referring to?

      Delete
  2. Oh wow..
    I'm on it! Another option another way to make it correct..☝❤

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is this in addition to the process of correcting your political status laid out over the last few months involving the endorsed birth certificate being sent to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and returning the responsibility for the municipal person using IRS form 56?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Once we start this domino process, how does it affect Social Security benefits?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes. I am not interested in waiving ANY of my assets that are being held in Social Security. So how does this process affect that?

    ReplyDelete
  6. On my honor I love your work Judge Anne but I owe nothing to fraud, save to end my participation in. I do not consent and waive all benefit. Much peace and great relations !
    #Abolition

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! The American people are the crime victims of all this criminality who have already suffered enough, all done without our knowledge or consent. Why do we have to jump through hoops for criminals who robbed and defrauded us all our lives and want to kill us off and still make a profit from it? All members of the BAR are liable. Are Personage and Barratry crimes or not? Personage: the crime of knowingly misrepresenting a living man or woman as a LEGAL FICTION - some form of corporation, such as a trust, public utility, or foundation. What good is the American Affidavit of Probable Cause that blows the lid off the entire fraud scheme and explains who (or what) is responsible for this mess if it is not going to be enforced?

      Delete
  7. Does any of this relate to Canadians. I know your writing is on America but do you know if the structures exist in Canada and how we go about (if we need to) claiming our name and estate in Canada?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Is this the same procedure for legal aliens naturalized as US Citizen?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IMHO, you are naturalized as a national of the state you inhabit after living there for so many years (you can look this up). In all of these documents you would simply replace state of birth with state of naturalization, born in (your) state with naturalized in (your) state. check out the early acts of naturalization. Most early settlers were not born here but were naturalized. You can also authentic your own country's COLB (certificate of live birth) in your home country (make sure it is the long form) and submit it for authentication to the SOS (Secretary Of State) in DC.

      Delete
  9. This is great but I was not missing in fact none of us was, These criminals should be undoing their criminal registering and paying restitution on top of this crime wave that seems to be speeding up instead of stopping. Works 100 percent of the time, any notice should put them in jail 100 percent of the time. They took my mother's golden years away and made her a ward to them. Drugged her against her will. And now the funeral is friday and myself knows every inch of that was the cause of these criminals. They even took it upon them selves to draft and replace her last will with their own
    version of a will. I am so angry at these common criminal thugs. Why do we put up with this, public people are afraid of the ones that are making claims it protect us. The only time we are mugged is from their soldiers quartered in our public houses, making fake house bills,strong armed dragging us to our own courthouses to be mugged. I am tired of this paper filing that lets these criminals carry on like always.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you so much Judge Anne and Paul also everyone that's involved in helping people. I am new to all of this and God knows we all needs this. There's a lot of valuable information to sort out and I think this is a good start for me, I just need some details. If you can or ANYONE here can help me get started please email me at jtuaniw@gmail.com. love&light to you all.

    ReplyDelete
  11. What about our names when formerly married when our last name changed? Do we include those names? Plus, what if we no longer live in the state of our birth?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just hyphenate so your maiden name is always present. You always will be a national of the state of your birth and an inhabitant of your current state where you live.

      Delete
    2. I don't want ANYTHING to do with Kalifornistan.

      Delete
    3. 1FreeMan, Thank you. I've always kept my maiden name as part of my married name but I wasn't sure they had to be in the copyright document. After divorcing I always went right back to my maiden name. Thank you for the clarity on state too!

      Delete
  12. what of naturalized citizen? wasn't born here so where is the remedy for i a man on the land but born on another?

    Peace

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. See my reply re: naturalization above. You can also send your CON (Certificate On Naturalization) to the SOS in DC for authentication as evidence and certification by the issuing entity that the security is verified and the estate is recognized.

      Delete
    2. Hi 1Freeman,I have some questions for you can you please email me @jtuaniw@gmail.com. Thank you.

      Delete
    3. Hi Jolly, sent you an email last night.

      Delete
    4. Hi 1 Freeman Please email me at bjq1226@yahoo.com lots of help needed

      Delete
    5. Unknown, what kind of help do you need?

      Delete
  13. Will someone help me find "the Common Law Copyright (example provided). Thank you for your help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't notice the example document so here is the link.

      http://annavonreitz.com/certificateofassumedname.pdf

      Delete
    2. Marion johnson~ email me at RLdesigns2@gmail.com and I will get you one.

      Delete
  14. They refused to record my documents at the land recorders office. I asserted my right to do so, I was repeatedly denied and told they would in no circumstance record these documents. Can you please advise? I live in Wisconsin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They should file your docs if you attach them to a Deed of Reconveyence. If not, you can mail them to the land recorder at Lamar County, Georgia, for filing.

      Delete
    2. Forgot, you can truck it to a neighboring county and see if they'll file them.

      Delete
    3. Lamar County, GA, will record anything. Once recorded, take their certified copy and record it in your county. They cannot refuse to record any document that has been recorded in another county.

      Delete
    4. Correct, record and re-record in the county of choice

      Delete
    5. Does it have to me recorded in the original county of birth? If not, why would it need to be RE recorded?

      Delete
    6. That depends on what you are intending on doing with it. Technically, since it is already recorded in the public with a county recorder anywhere in the country, you should not have to re-record it at all. However, to solidify your political status as a State National, you would want to re-record it in your birth state county. To add clout to your political status in the state you inhabit if different from your birth state and county, you would want to record it in your current state and county. A plaintiff, judge or sheriff may not be very impressed with something that does not have a stamp from their own local county recorder in their own state.

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    9. Richard, sorry to see you removed your comments. I believe you were on the right track using 18 U.S. Code § 2071. By sending it Registered Mail via Notary Presentment with the Registered Mail # on each document, makes it an official document acknowledged by a Public Officer which is what a Notary is. Step 2, before mailing it, would be to get a Certificate of Notary Authority from the County Recorder acknowledging the Notary's standing that they are a registered Notary in good standing, which they will gladly attach to the notarized document. They have no problem with this and will charge you about $5 for this service. But you will still have a fight on your hands when you go back with the rejected documents to get them to officially record it no matter what you say.
      A much easier way is to simply record it in another county first, like Lamar, and bring the certified copy into your county. There are codes in every county that state that they have to accept any document that is recorded in "in any public recording office in the United States" and record it. Here is the code for NJ:
      NJ Rev Stat § 46:26A-4 (2013)
      46:26A-4. Exceptions to prerequisites to recording.
      Notwithstanding the prerequisites to recording in N.J.S.46:26A-3, the following may be recorded:
      g. certified copies of:
      (3)documents recorded or filed in any public recording office in the United States;
      Just find the one for your state, print it out and bring it with you to your county recorder. When my county recorder gave me some grief that they usually do not file documents like these (Reconveyance of Deed & Act of Expatriation). When I told her that it has already been filed in another county and that I now want to record in my county, she took a photocopy and my number and said that she would need to have it reviewed and get back to me. That was last week so I am waiting for a call any moment. If she refuses for whatever reason, she will be violating the above cited NJ code and be accountable.
      IMHO, "certified copies of...documents recorded or filed in any public recording office in the United States" includes any documents recorded or filed with any court. So if you filed anything into say a foreclosure case, then it is already recorded in public recording office in the US. Just request certified copies of the documents you want from the court clerk and go and file them with your county recorder.

      Delete
    10. I am curious how this works out for you. In California the clerk looks in her book and comes back and tells me no provision to file. Anyone in Calif able to get something like this filed?

      Delete
    11. I live in California and was also told I needed to have a provision to file *and* (escalated to supervisor) was told that The Deed of Reconveyance was being incorrectly used and was intended for loan repayments.

      Delete
  15. Two Questions: (1) Where is the Common Law Copyright example
    (2) Where do we Record it. Which Recorders Office.
    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't notice the example document so here is the link.

      http://annavonreitz.com/certificateofassumedname.pdf

      Delete
    2. See above. Lamar Cointy first, then your county.

      Delete
    3. 1FreeMan, more confusion. I live in Ohio, what does Lamar County have to do with it??

      Delete
    4. Most county recorders will refuse to record your documents. Lamar county will record anything, even your grandmother's recipe for chocolate chunk cookies. Once you file in Lamar County and get your certified copy back out, your Local county in Ohio cannot refuse to record it because it was already recorded in another county. That is the rule and they cannot avoid it.

      Delete
    5. The county recorders office isnt allowed to dishonor any filing, as long as it meets their minimum requirements , because they arent attorneys and cannot give legal advice. If there was something missing from their requirements to be filed, ask them what the defect is....just tell me how to make it acceptable. Sometimes the DA's office that oversees fradulent filings tell the clerks working in the filing office not to file certain paperwork from people that looks like it came from the "patriot community". If they wont file it, then go to the DA's office and ask them why it camt be filed as is....they are attorneys and should be able to tell you why, or find out why...!!!

      Delete
    6. She says two documents, where is the other? Local county recording is enough?

      Delete
  16. "permanently domiciling your Name/Name on the land and soil of the state where you were born" I am a mere student of Law and a respectful fan of Judge Anna. Over the years I have learned from several teachers. Some have lost my trust and some I am still digesting. Ed Riviera of Organic Laws Institute and his student Paul Hanson teach from Volume One of the United States Code. It does appear fact that the word "of" implies ownership/jurisdiction. Permanently on the land "of" the state may present future challenges. I am admittedly not in the league with Judge Anna but respectfully wonder if a precautional tweak in wording may be worth considering.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. perhaps using the word "called" instead of "of" would be fine?

      Delete
    2. Exactly!
      The geographical "state" jurisdiction VS the legal hypothetical "State" political subdivision of D.C. jurisdiction.
      Physical Land and soil of the physical geographical state, not the conceptual Legal State or STATE.

      Delete
    3. Best way to explain Of or From is basically they mean a derivative of , so State of and STATE OF are subservient to , I have it some place but for instance "within this State" in statute means under the jurisdiction of the State and technically it means DC, as a "resident" you are within this States's (DC) jurisdiction while in the physical state Florida. So by qualifying Florida with the physical characteristics of land and soil it is virtually impossible to mistake what is being referred to and technically lower case "state" is the physical.

      Delete
    4. All attorneys, especially judges simply reffer to it as "The State of the Forum" or "Forum State". The Stae where contracts are formed. So if your in court, just ask the judge, if your assuming i live or reside in the "Forum State", then prove it. What is the foundational instrament the court is using that created the liability as a man on the LAND , to all your statutory laws and basically changed my status from a free man, to a corporate fiction...A "PERSON" abondoned on the sea. Who is making the "salvage claim"!!! Let him know, you know...!!! Now his wondering what else you know. Should he take a chance and go foreward, or should i find a way to get out of this and possibly "liable" for the charges...???

      Delete
    5. It's the bond that is the issue who holds the bond that the case is generated from, the bond is the claim the maritime lien against your vessel the registered incorporated commercial entity evidenced with your BC that you unknowingly act as agent fiduciary for and they hold you as surety for defaulting your responsibilities as such, this is the whole game in a nutshell it has nothing to do with any charges just the bonds and weather they are satisfied.
      Your traffic ticket is nothing but a performance appearance bond which they monetize as with all bonds, start clearly signing with a thumbprint and "NON-representative" capacity printed or simply state "I will only sign if I retain the original copy I was advised by my legal council", they need the wet ink original to be monetized.

      Delete
    6. .....continued:
      Explicitly revoke any/all power of attorney and demand any certified proof of such existing in any case, power of attorney to create any bonds in the first place everything stems from your signature.
      This is from 27 CFR the presumed police power behind 26 CFR the presumed taxing authority so their is remedy lurking here.

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/27/19.156

      Delete
    7. Is the Deed of reconvayence for property only? Or my name?

      Delete
  17. can someone please make a step by step instruction video and post it on youtube. thank you

    ReplyDelete
  18. Illinois and several other states only use/allow Satisfaction of Mortgage. Can you please advise?
    Thanks-
    Cindy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Cindy, I'm in Illinois to I could really use some info.

      Delete
    2. See my comments before this one.

      Delete
    3. You may need to go to your county recorder and ask to physically see the file on everything that has been recorded on your property. Eventhough they are required to record these and they do, they somehow get away with not posting them in the online record so when you search for it you won't find it. If you find it in your file, get several certified copies and send them to the plaintiff and the court if you are in foreclosure. This is prima facea evidence that your mortgage is fully paid and satisfied. You may also want to acknowledge and accept the deed. Check out this video for details: https://youtu.be/BqpBT6-3-oo

      Delete
    4. Awesome Information..
      I'm in a foreclosure freeman, and they're trying to remove me my twins and grandson from our home of 13 years
      I need information to crush these bastards 😡, not that I haven't done everything anna has suggested, because I have
      But I need an ace card..♠👊
      Email me please at Kimberly. Bonds45@yahoo.com
      Thank you

      Delete
    5. Kimberly, I just sent you an email.

      Delete
    6. Freeman, can you email me as well @ jtuaniw@gmail.com. thanks. Cause I'm confused. Lol

      Delete
    7. Kimberly... have you phisically gone to the county recorders office to see everything filed on your property like i have been telling everyone to do. Dont use the internet. It will only give you 3 to 5 years at a time and gets confusing. Plus online, you cannot even look at the actual recording documents without paying for them first...at the county recorders office they usually have 3 or 4 computers already set up for the public to use as soon as you walk in. All you have to do is enter your name and everything filed on you will show up immediately, and you can even look at any filing, which may be as long as 20 pages, for free. You only have to pay for it if you want a certified printout. But at least you will know all the parties involved in your property. I guaranteen you one of them will be MERS(Morgtage Eletronic Registration Service), a completely unlawfully created "private" filing system, mimicing the county recorders office, but with no access to the public. And the banks keep lying that they have transfered "benefitial interest" to them. But they have repeadedly stated on the record that they have absoluty "No beneficial interest" in the loan at all. Remember Kimberly, you are not looking for a judicial decision....if you corresponded with the servicing company with those 3 letters i gave you before and got your "default" filed, you are only looking for a "ministerial" decision because they failed to state a claim upon which relief can be given(FRCP12(b)6). Therefore it is "res judicata" and "stare decises". The case has already been settled using your administrative remedy. They never gave you anything you ask for to prove they had a claim....period. Dont let the judge try and get away with making a judicial descision....."OBJECTION" your honor. This case has been settled already using my administrative remedy...

      Delete
    8. 1FreeMan can you email me as well ollie1047@yahoo.com Thanks

      Delete
    9. Oliver, what kind of help do you need?

      Delete
  19. Yes I would like a step by step in how this done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For step by step instructions, check out Anna's: The Top Ten Articles for Rapid Assistance http://annavonreitz.com/toptenarticles.pdf

      Delete
  20. Hello Judge Anna,

    Thank you for all that you do and have done to free America and the world. You are greatly appreciated and loved.

    I rewrote your simple statement: Deed Of Reconveyance and then looked again for the Common Law Copyright (example provided) and found it wasn't provided.
    Checked the internet and the price for Copyright was $119.00, which is too steep for a youngster like myself on Soc. Sec.
    Do you have another solution???

    Thank you
    Big hug

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you follow Anna's instructions, you file it as a deed in the following order: 1. Deed of Reconveyence (1 page) 2. Copyright (2 pages), 3. Act of Expatriation (1 page). Send these 4 pages to be filed together to Lamar County. You will pay $10 for the 1st page and $2 for each additional page for a total of $16. You will get your original back with a recorded stamp on it which you can file locally in your county as a deed for whatever they charge for deed recording which in my state is $40 for the first page plus $10 for each additional page. You can also order certified copies from Lamar for $2.50 for the first page and $0.50 for each additional copy per set for a total of $4 per set.

      Delete
    2. Hello 1 freeman, so you're saying I can send these documents into Lamar county by mail or Internet?
      If by mail would you please send me an address?
      $10 for first page $2 per additional pages..
      This is great! 😀 I'm in Cleveland Ohio and the recorders office has refused my docs repeatedly I can put on 2 hands..😡

      Delete
    3. Absolutely, Kimberly. By mail, not internet. You must send originals and a SASE for them to send it back. If you are in a hurry you can send overnight via any carrier but if you want overnight back you must enclose a prepaid USPS overnight (or 2 day Priority Mail) envelope for return as they will only deal with the PO. Here is the address:

      Attn: Filing Officer – Mr. William S. Hewitt
      Lamar County Courthouse
      326 Thomaston Street, Box 7
      Barnesville, GA 30204-1669

      Send with a cover letter telling them what you want and include your check or money order payable to: “Clerk of Superior Court” and our SASE. You may want to request/order a certified copy or multiple copies of your recorded docs while you are at it for $2.50 for the first page + $0.50 for each additional page per set. They are pretty quick for a recorder. Usually 7 to 10 days. Once you have your registered docs back, you can immediately start using your certified copies while you file your original or another certified copy with your local recorder.

      Delete
    4. 1Freeman, tell me why are you advising her to file in Georgia if she lives in the Ohio??
      Sorry, but my Accounting Mentality has to have a reason for everything, lol

      Delete
    5. Never mind, its abbreviated for self address stamp envelope lol

      Delete
    6. Abby, already answered your question the first time you asked me. See above.

      Delete
  21. I read through parts of the example for the Common Law Copyright
    but some of it does not seem to fit for me. Here's another one of my 'dumb' questions........is there a shorter version that would work, or is all the wording in this example necessary. And is there a more standard form we could use that would suffice.?

    ReplyDelete
  22. when one has done this process, can I travel with my old US Passport or can I get a new state national passport or something similiar?
    Thanks Carl

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You should and will want to apply for a new passport as a non-citizen national. Check out this site for details: http://coppermoonshinestills.com/id71.html

      Delete
    2. You're awesome! Freeman, this is where the passport Anna has told us to get once we've processed our political status..👍

      Delete
  23. I believe Expatriation is not necessary unless you were physically born in DC? , nobody (natural person) has ever elected their permanent Domicile so the domicile of your Legal Person created in DC has been the default domicile of everything attached to the legal fiction and your body (natural person) has just gone along for the ride with the entity.
    So essentially you are claiming your natural persons name to the land through copyright and Electing it's domicile (home) (remember Dorothy was trying to get her body back home,"there is NO place like home" even though she was technically only in OZ/DC in a dream state and not physically.) Instead of acting as resident (foreign) agent of the DC domiciled entity, realize it is their entity not yours, you are creating your own entity you control.
    It's like your parents gave you a car at birth but also the state gave one also, the one your parents gave you never left the garage and you have only been using the state issued car with it jurisdictional regulations of DC , the car your parents gave you has a different set of regulations but these were lost along with the driving instructions, consider this one a diesel manual automobile and the State issued is a gas automatic motorvehicle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow! Thanks. Now, how how do I get back home? is the question. Preparing the right documents is key and that's where I'm stuck at and the rules per state is a hurtle. I live in Illinois, born in American Samoa, raised in Hawaii.

      Thank you for posting your comment; love it!

      Delete
    2. Mike what you say is fine and well but no court will honor what you say but only what is on the public record. They convicted Ed and Elaine Brown on their claiming to be US Citizens on their passport application. That is why you do need to expatriate your presumed US Citizenship which is currently your only status on the public record unless you rebut it on the public record to the contrary.

      Delete
    3. JW if you were born in American Samoa then you are already a US National which is not subject to same laws as the US Citizen specifically taxes.
      LOL a few years back I was looking into expatriating to A.Samoa.

      Delete
    4. Who wants to be a US National or a US Anything? As long as you are a US National, you are still subject to US corporate municipal government services corporation statutes, codes and taxation. You want to be a (fill in your state) National and as such an American National as define by 8 U.S. Code §1502 here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1502 Nothing less. BTW: the Certificate of nationality issued by Secretary of State referenced here is no longer being issued. Instead "If a person believes he or she is eligible under the law as a non-citizen national of the United States and the person complies with the provisions of section 341(b) of the INA, 8 USC 1452(b),he/she may apply for a passport at any Passport Agency in the United States.. When applying, applicants must execute a Form DS-11 and show documentary proof of their non-citizen national status as well as their identity." source: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal-considerations/us-citizenship-laws-policies/certificates-of-non-citizen-nationality.html

      Delete
    5. Expatriation only happens with the removal of office, 6013g. If you did not revoke the election properly, they don't care what you send to them.

      Delete
    6. Cube, if you are referencing IRC § 6013(g), this has nothing to do with expatriating back to the land but "is to determine whether a nonresident alien individual married to a U.S. citizen or resident alien properly made the election to be treated as a resident of the United States." Nevertheless, IRC § 6013(g)(4)(A) of the same chapter gives you your remedy to terminate your election:

      (4) Termination of election
      An election under this subsection shall terminate at the earliest of the following times:
      (A) Revocation by taxpayers
      If either taxpayer revokes the election, as of the first taxable year for which the last day prescribed by law for filing the return of tax under chapter 1 has not yet occurred.

      Once you expatriate and reclaim your state national status you are no longer subject any of their statutes and codes or taxation.

      Delete
    7. 1FreeMan, I am familiar with the case and believe a lot more was happening then just what they claimed on the passport application, was she not running a business and was already filing taxes then decides she was not going to file any longer? They may have used the Passport as supporting evidence to the case but obviously it was not the single deciding factor in its outcome. If you read the passport application carefully you will see it states it is evidence of your nationality, unless you provided supporting evidence of citizenship but I also believe the "U.S." referred to in the passport application is the continental USA not just the District and its possessions.
      You are presumed to be domiciled in DC or at least your citizen-ship (ship of State/ entity/ estate) is, if you elect or declare your domicile (state) and by law you can only have "1" true domicile, so by default you are removing yourself from DC jurisdiction and the presumption is gone.
      Personally I'm not concerned with the public record, if what you do is private as in recording documents etc then the public is of no concern, if it is you should be able to file an affidavit of domicile at the local court (a public filing) or just send one to the Secretary of State to update the public record at any time and when they do not respond you have tacit consent and an un-rebutted affidavit.

      Basically if you have proof of your Nativity state you were born in AKA your original domicile, and a declaration of you current permanent domicile which you can change at any time THEN they can call you whatever they want to and all you know is those are your facts in evidence and whatever other titles they try to confuse you with are irrelevant if you stand on those facts, unless somebody wants to step forward and sign a sworn affidavit to the contrary.

      (open question)
      Question if you are expatriated has this been recognized in any court proceeding and received remedy not available to a US citizen?

      Delete
    8. 1Freeman,

      It is the election to be treated as a resident of DC, that allows for federal jurisdiction. Terminate that election (I have ) that is expatriation from DC. Now, you never left the land, so nothing needs to be done except to claim your property back from the public domain. The State only has evidence of an event at a foundling hospital, and a deed to land authored by mother after she left in their care, fetal tissue, maternal tissue and the record of that biological material. Read unam sanctu, " every creature is subject to the Roman Pontif" So called expatriation does not address this problem.

      Delete
    9. So Cube, how did you terminate your election?

      Delete
    10. Cube ? kinda confusing not sure how you elect to be treated as a "resident" of DC , if they are in possession of your biological material this is physically "domiciled" in DC which is the base presumption that you are domiciled is DC, if you are a resident of DC then by default this means you have a domicile some place else, the true meaning of resident is resident-alien.
      A true election or declaration of Domicile in a state by default kills the presumption of being domiciled in DC (except for their fictional entity/ US citizen) in which case they would have to admit is something separate and still exists there which kinda defeats their agenda.
      Realize nobody is dealing with the highest levels of the Mob , we are dealing with the local families and street level bosses and thugs (administrators) just like in the movies the top boss cant care less how it gets done but the tribute better come in as scheduled. You can be 100% correct about all the Vatican BS but try to prove any of it at the street level they are just going to have you psych evaluated because nobody in the lower degrees of the system has a damn clue they follow procedure and whatever forms they got in front of them. And I'm aware of all Kurts work have most of his audio’s, the reality is the more you understand the more crazy you are to everyone else, some of the best people with success in the courts is only because they know the code and procedure better then the morons trying to administrate them.
      Additionally by declaring your state domicile, you kill the presumption of being a "resident" of the State/STATE , but people need to realize actions speak loader then words, if it walks talks and acts like a duck (US citizen) then what is any paper work going to prove if your accepting federal benefits all over the place , accepting a benefit is a quasi-contract pure Roman Civil law (DC) the federal government is in the business of servicing its citizens through public policy so if one is receiving services what does that make you by default or at least presumed to be, consider your US citizen ship as nothing more then a shovel the longer you use it and benefit from it the deeper the hole you are in.

      Delete
    11. Its states in USC. 26, 6013 that you notify the director of IRS and can never after file a return. These thugs will come after you anyway, you need to know how to handle any claim by IRS through the US Tax Court. If you fail to challenge there, too late, federal jurisdiction is already established through the foundling child that has no voice! If people just read the above, 6013, you will not have to guess, however, Anna is telling people to just revoke without knowing what to do next, not wise.

      Delete
    12. The moment you filed a tax return, that is the election which now makes you the withholding agent, federal office. Did you not sign a W-4 under penalty of perjury? Yes, thats right, you are your own withholding agent acting against yourself from what USC. 26, 6013 says. The law is the contract you signed and that is voluntary!!

      Delete
    13. (g) Election to treat nonresident alien individual as resident of the United States
      (1) In general
      A nonresident alien individual with respect to whom this subsection is in effect for the taxable year shall be treated as a resident of the United States—
      (A) for purposes of chapter 1 for all of such taxable year, and
      (B) for purposes of chapter 24 (relating to wage withholding) for payments of wages made during such taxable year.
      (2) Individuals with respect to whom this subsection is in effect
      This subsection shall be in effect with respect to any individual who, at the close of the taxable year for which an election under this subsection was made, was a nonresident alien individual married to a citizen or resident of the United States, if both of them made such election to have the benefits of this subsection apply to them. (3) Duration of election
      An election under this subsection shall apply to the taxable year for which made and to all subsequent taxable years until terminated under paragraph (4) or (5); except that any such election shall not apply for any taxable year if neither spouse is a citizen or resident of the United States at any time during such year.
      (4) Termination of election
      An election under this subsection shall terminate at the earliest of the following times:
      (A) Revocation by taxpayers
      If either taxpayer revokes the election, as of the first taxable year for which the last day prescribed by law for filing the return of tax under chapter 1 has not yet occurred.
      (B) Death
      In the case of the death of either spouse, as of the beginning of the first taxable year of the spouse who survives following the taxable year in which such death occurred; except that if the spouse who survives is a citizen or resident of the United States who is a surviving spouse entitled to the benefits of section 2, the time provided by this subparagraph shall be as of the close of the last taxable year for which such individual is entitled to the benefits of section 2.
      (C) Legal separation
      In the case of the legal separation of the couple under a decree of divorce or of separate maintenance, as of the beginning of the taxable year in which such legal separation occurs.
      (D) Termination by Secretary
      At the time provided in paragraph (5).
      (5) Termination by Secretary
      The Secretary may terminate any election under this subsection for any taxable year if he determines that either spouse has failed—
      (A) to keep such books and records,
      (B) to grant such access to such books and records, or
      (C) to supply such other information,
      as may be reasonably necessary to ascertain the amount of liability for taxes under chapter 1 of either spouse for such taxable year.
      (6) Only one election
      If any election under this subsection for any two individuals is terminated under paragraph (4) or (5) for any taxable year, such two individuals shall be ineligible to make an election under this subsection for any subsequent taxable year.

      Delete
    14. Read above carefully, you can be treated as if you are a resident in DC! That means you are not a resident/US citizen........Read........

      Delete
    15. Not my words, IRS wrote the code.

      Delete
    16. Cube, "nonresident alien individual" and "nonresident alien" are not the same it their attempt to confuse you?
      If you are domiciled in a state you are a "nonresident alien" in relationship to DC,
      "nonresident alien individual" is from a foreign country and can't be domiciled in a state.

      ""The term nonresident alien individual means a person described in section 7701(b)(1)(B), an alien individual who is a resident of a foreign country under the residence article of an income tax treaty and Sec. 301.7701(b)-7(a)(1) of this chapter, or an alien individual who is a resident of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or American Samoa as determined under Sec. 301.7701(b)-1(d) of this chapter.

      And where is Anna telling anyone to revoke anything? Just asking if I missed that part, recording and declaring your Domicile is NOT revocation of anything it is rebutting their presumption that you are domiciled in DC by default because you have been acting as a State resident not understanding the situation.
      LOL I can read very well but thank you for the advise though I also do extensive research on top of reading codes, you should do some more on the IRS and what "income" actually is, and if they are bringing you into tax court you already lost.

      Delete
    17. Cube, What evidence proves one is actually a "nonresident alien individual" beside reading a code and presuming it?
      Do you understand the election here is for two married individuals one being a "nonresident alien individual" to be treated jointly for tax purposes, this is regarding filing jointly the election revocation is to sever the election of filing together. That is it you elected to be treated as one and fall under the umbrella of the actual citizen/resident then you later revoke the elected to not file jointly.

      I suggest reading the whole code from the beginning which dictates the complete subject matter NOT just the little part that seems to fit ones needs, and you will see also right in the beginning it states the "nonresident alien" as I mentioned which is different and you can NOT file jointly to begin with to even establish the election in the first place WHY because the "nonresident alien" is not taxed but the other "individual" it clearly indicates a difference and can be.

      """(a) Joint returns A husband and wife may make a single return jointly of income taxes under subtitle A, even though one of the spouses has neither gross income nor deductions, except as provided below:
      (1) no joint return shall be made if either the husband or wife at any time during the taxable year is a nonresident alien;... """

      Just another point to clarify you are quoting USC not the IRS manual they did not write the code they only fraudulently attempt to enforce it as a 3rd party collection service with no actual enabling act through Congress or Federal Registry publication authorizing the compulsion of 1040 tax return flings.

      Delete
    18. Mike,

      For all your brilliance, IRS is the only claims that are administrated at the USTC, we only challenge their claim, their jurisdiction,..........Go back and read some of Anna's articles, its there. This is very suspect, very good that you have it figured out.

      Delete
    19. I smell a rat, be aware people, there are games afoot!

      In looking at 26 USC §6013, that section pertains to Joint Returns by married couples. Is it clear that (g) relates to the ‘election’ of the Federal Income Tax as a whole, or does it relate to the ‘election’ of whether to file jointly or separately?

      The way statutes are written and the logic behind them is often times somewhat obscured. The first thing you need to ask yourself is; “Have you ever heard of a tax law that only applies to married parties and not to a single person?” Right off the bat, it is easy to see that it sounds like an illogical approach to let everyone that is married revoke their election and force the single people to participate in the election.

      Delete
    20. From Anna:

      There are two jurisdictions involved, not one. Both must be addressed. Establishing your Common Law Copyright and re-conveying your Trade Name to the land jurisdiction takes care of the Municipal PERSON, but you still have to peel the onion back and expatriate from the presumption of Territorial "citizenship", too.


      Two jurisdictions. Two processes.

      Delete
    21. Cube, this is Code fiction color of law it is not meant to be easily understood by the public.

      But understand all this section is pertaining only to Joint Return and your election to be treated as a "resident" for the purpose of filing jointly.
      Unless you understand each specific term the code means nothing, like the subtle difference of just adding "individual" changes the whole meaning and the difference between a US citizen and resident or US itself, where strictly they are meaning a physical resident living in the district but does not mean a citizen, so you are a foreigner living as a resident in DC for a taxable year electing to be a resident for the purpose of filing a joint return.
      After which either of you can revoke the election to be treated as a "resident" while filing jointly.

      """(4) Termination of election
      An election under this subsection shall terminate at the earliest of the following times:
      (A) Revocation by taxpayers -
      If either taxpayer revokes the election....."""

      Note it states an election made under this section (only made under this section no other section)
      also by taxpayers, you are still "taxpayers" you only revoked the election of one to be treated as a resident while filing jointly, one may still qualify as a resident and still be a taxpayer and file separately after revoking the election previously made in this section.

      Delete
    22. Mike,

      I have resolved all issues concerning this matter. Perhaps there are other ways, do you still pay federal taxes? Can you provide any dismissals for lack of jurisdiction? Show everyone how you did it.

      Delete
  24. John S. Potomac Maryland said...
    Hello Judge Anna: I want to thank you for all that you have done and continue to do. May God continue to bless you, your family and the staff of the Living Law Firm.

    I have a couple of questions.

    1. What is the significance of the date of November 15, 1996 on the Certificate of Assumed Name, Notice of Transfer of Reserved Name? I am assuming it is the Date of Birth of your son?
    2. By using the ALL CAPS language in the first paragraph are you not using Glossa and or dogging the latin language or American Sign Language? Is so what is the significance of the usage of the ALL CAPS paragraph?
    3. I am wondering if the reason you mention "additionally attaching an Act of Expatriation as another "Extension" to the Deed of Re-Conveyance" is for someone who was born in the District of Columbia or other Territory of the United States to expatriate from being born on the land in Washington, DC and to establish their domicile on the land in one of the 50 States?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John your 2nd question: this CERTIFICATE was completed before Anna wrote about DOG-LATIN 02-16-2017.

      Everyone must put hyphens between every capitalized word (sign).

      Educate yourselves here, Anna already carries a Load:
      https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/

      “This is proper English descriptive text”

      “THIS-IS-PROPER-WRITTEN-SIGN-LANGUAGE-USING-THE-GRAMMATICAL-RULES-OF-LATIN-TEXT” (Identified in Article 11:147 of the Chicago Manual of Styles, SIXTEENTH EDITION.

      “THIS TEXT IS DOG LATIN BEING LATIN TEXT BASED ON THE GRAMMATICAL RULES OF ENGLISH” … Notice, no hyphens: This is know as: Debased Latin: “DOG-LATIN, language of the illiterate: Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition”

      For the love of people and humanity: The Deception is DOG-LATIN, being the corruption in the text. The all uppercase foreign text is the DOG-LATIN appearing as the cause of the counterfeit-fraud. The act of usurping “DOG-LATIN” into English written instruments in order to deceive the public into surrendering the Treasury, is EVIL and DEMONIC. The CODE-OF-DECEPTION-HAS-BEEN-CRACKED.

      And is noted as criminal under the English Dictionary, identified as a “Dog Latin, being a debased form of text”. Debase synonyms appear as Criminal and Immoral and Evil and as a counterfeit, along with many more declensions.

      There is no jurisdiction between two separate languages appearing on one document. This is the guts of their deceptive crime: “English” and “Latin” or “DOG-LATIN” can not exist as one jurisdiction. Reference: Article: 11:147 Chicago Manual of Styles: Sixteenth Edition: Foreign Languages.

      A man can not live in the sea without a ship, and if you enter into the legal world of commerce, (Maritime Jurisdiction, law of water) you must be able to trust your ship that holds your estate. If your ship is dogged with a corruption, your estate (Cargo) is in peril.

      It may also help if you know the difference between the grammatical rules of the written language of the land and the written language of the sea or you may find yourself, “presumed”: “LOST AT SEA”

      The: Power of Rome, is alive and well in the modern systems of governance that govern the “citizens” of the world today but is it right? is it Just? … Or is it the system of Satan itself, a system of hidden slavery in order to control the masses via a private CONTRACTING system in order to forgo true Justice? being a system to remove man from the common law of the public jurisdiction in order to subject such a man to fall into private foreign contracts in order to forgo common law justice without arousing suspicion… As described in Blacks Law Dictionary under “GLOSSA”, and Justinian.

      Quote "Special Thanks to: Anna Maria, Von Reitz, for her confirmation by her legal team in relation to such research and for her dedication for her love of humanity." by Romley Stewart

      Video DECEIVED-INTO-CONSENT 08/18/2017:
      https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2017/08/18/deceived-into-consent/

      Video PRESUMPTION-OF-LAW 07/11/2017:
      https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/presumption-of-law/

      Video THE-LEDGER-BAIT 07/06/2017:
      https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2017/07/06/the-ledger-bait/

      Delete
    2. From Anna:

      The DOG LATIN is just an ACCOUNT designation written deceptively in letters instead of numbers. It belongs to you once you claim your common law copyright.


      Yes, of course, substitution your actual Date of Birth.


      Anyone can expatriate from any assumed or presumed political status at any time--- those born in a Territory or Municipal holding like DC may expatriate back to the land based on their parent's birthright.

      Delete
    3. Anna, I have a question I believe would help many on this forum: what about 1.) green card holders aka resident aliens, and, 2.) foreigners who have become US Citizens by naturalization? Can they claim that they are nationalized as a State National to the land and soil of the state they have inhabited for so many years? There must be some Act of Naturalizarion that outlines what the requirements were for early immigrants and settlers to become nationals. Can they substitute state of "birth" with state of "naturalization" as in..."permanently domicile upon and repatriate to the soil of Their/THEIR naturalization known as (state)", and their "birth" state with their "naturalized" or "naturalization" state? Sometimes it is very difficult for these folks to secure an authenticated copy of their Certificate of Live Birth from their home country to be able to send to the SOS in DC to be authenticated. Can they possibly send a copy of their Certificate of Naturalization or Nonresident Alien card certified by a Notary as a true copy of the original to the SOS in DC and have that authenticated instead? Will they then be able to use this in their process to surrender the FEDERAL PERSON back to the Treasury and appoint Mr. Mnuchin as their fiduciary on a Form 56?

      Delete
  25. As stated in this Article ''we are operating the actual unincorporated government''. Anna, how exactly are you operating it; what does this mean in reality. I ask, because according to what all is going on to this day, it seems its the same as its always been, with the same buggers running the show. When can we expect to see the ''pineapple on the cake''( which all us ole women know is on the bottom and must be flipped over.)

    ReplyDelete
  26. This is a futile exercise of trying to bring ones spirit into a certain physical limiting form.
    NO PAPER CAN BRING LIFE OR SET ONE FREE
    One cannot disprove a negative, how can you remove by re-conveyance a fiction back into a form of life when it could never represent which is already true ? Anna a prophesier? the Word ? Redeeming ones self in the light that which resurrections come into all knowing ?
    I AM NOT INDUCED INTO SUCH SLUMBER OF ANOTHER'S GOVERNED MIND BEING UNTRUE,I NEED NOT TRUST SOME AMERICAN GOVERN MIND(GOVERNMENT)in place of God that which is supra natural'sacred and holy. trinity

    WHO IS WE ANNA? THATS who presumably has 100% success? I KNOW THIS ISNT HOLY or TRUE <I REMAIN WITH GOD AND SEE ALL-BEINGS truthfully. MY PINAL GLAND IS FULLY CONSCIOUS in one BEING true,THE GARDEN IS PRESERVED <THE TREE OF LIFE IS ABUNDANT WHICH NOURISHES ONES SOUL WITH THE FRUIT,THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT OF KNOWLEDGE IS THE POISONOUSNESS TREE THAT IS DEAD AND CONDEMNS THOSE WHICH ONLY THINK THEY KNOW GOD WITHIN <BUT ONE WHO FEELS the omni present and potency of God need never think once. I have the keys to the kingdom they were given freely for I asked within my heart by praying me ,and I set my self free without form and or conditions of the mind.
    IN THE BEGINNING THEIR WAS THE WORD
    Choose precisely children of God no other manor woman can lead one to God for he is not found in chronological time nor can he be seen externally ,he is within that which is engraved (in grave.DEAD body=earth)in his image ,meaning you ,we ,all are God.

    let this awareness set you free


    RAYMI
    special1secrets@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  27. I know where you coming from but that's a whole nother topic.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Precise, not only have you missed Anna's entire point, but you have also missed the One True God. This world runs on Documents of all kinds. To make things simpler for you, a birth certificate is the document which designates your entry and existence into this world. And guess what? A death certificate is to indicate your 'departure''.
    What is not needed here, is your spaced out new age preferred 'religion' which is for people who don't want a real God who has mandates and conditions for just about everything.
    You are free to believe whatever you wish, but STOP trying to push it on others. As for me, when I see your name, I will just ''walk on by''.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Where do we find the Common Law Copyright example?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Look up Sharon, for several links to this document. Nevertheless, here it is again: http://annavonreitz.com/certificateofassumedname.pdf

      Delete
  30. Anna..
    The example for the common law copyright, do we use the format, just altering the name, address and state?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Lamar County Georgia is not only county that will record documents. I've recorded docs in Bibb and Spaulding county Georgia with no problems. In fact anywhere I have tried with no problems. FYI Lamar County Georgia is backed up 6 months + on recordings. If a county recorded refuses pull their oath of office and bond, pull their duties, job description from the state code, create affidavit of facts of violation of duties, accept the oath of office, get notarized and notice the pirate. If clerk still refuses file claims on their bond. And even more power if several people do it at the same time. I would not accept a public servant not serving...

    ReplyDelete
  32. lets put your crap in gear ,what can u do with th eltest news from Anna? what? talk about it ? what can you gain or anyone else from what you THINK only? I will give $19k to any who can stop a foreclosure with what ever you claim works ..put your money where your mouth is ,children of blind ignorance ,talking shit about a grown man .lunacy ..your humours are imbalanced go do your inner work..

    ReplyDelete
  33. I just want to Note that I have never 'elected' to sign a W-4. Employees are forced to sign it in order to be employed.
    Same thing applies to filing a fed. income tax form.
    It is Employers that have made themselves willing unpaid servants of the IRS by sending employees a W-2 or a 1099 Form and report all your personal information to the IRS Tyrants. Employers are participants of this game.
    However, when you sign a W-4 for an Employer at your work place, it is only good for one year. These are to be renewed each year, but few Employers do this.
    So if you work at a job, employers will force you to sign a W-4 and will take fed. tax out of your wages. There is almost no way they will agree to Zero deduction. Sometimes they will go ahead and deduct an amt. of tax anyhow. Then the only way you would ever get it back is to be forced to file a 1040 tax form.
    This is a vicious game where ''they'' have everybody working against you. Even the little payroll girl who has been brainwashed with the LIE of 'you must pay your fair share''.
    Just my 2 cents.

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I convinced a deputy clerk in Florida to file my expatriation and re-deed. I even got a certified copy from her. But she warned me they may reject everything from "higher up". I looked up the filed instrument # online two days later and it says "THIS INSTRUMENT NUMBER WAS ASSIGNED TO A DOCUMENT IN ERROR".

    Well, sorry Charlie the Tuna. It makes no difference what they do once I have a certified copy.

    I posted this so people can understand the unlawful games they play. IF you can convince a clerk to file it pending official approval AND get a certified copy, you have all you need regardless of what excuse they may use to hide it from the public record.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LLN, in my opinion the ''higher ups'' will still say your document is not on File since the online record does not show the document at all, but merely says the NUMBER was assigned in error. Then your certified copy in hand will be hard to use at all. I hope Anna reads your Comment here, and can give us all an answer to this problem which many have and will encounter. ''They'' are holding us in prison here! Even county Recorders are participating in the Game. We are dealing with Tyrant bastards!

      Delete
    2. I would go ahead and file it in Lamar County as well so at least you have a good recording on the public record that will solidify your first filing.

      Delete
    3. 1FreeMan..I am still at the point of finding the proper first paragraph for the Certificate, quoting the ''law' for my own place of residence, Ohio. All I could find for ''assumed name'' is ......how to register with Ohio as a business, then answer a bunch of questions like what type of business....a DBA. Even then, it only protects my name in my own state. And I am not trying to register, I'm trying to Record my own little own name, lol.

      Delete
  36. This appears to be the Session Law to which Anna references in the Certificate of Assumed Name. Wanted to read it for its language, to see if its useful in finding the Session Laws in other states, for us Georgia, Louisiana.
    http://leg.wa.gov/CodeReviser/documents/sessionlaw/1907c145.pdf "CHAPTER 145. [H. B. 64.] PROVIDING FOR FILING OF NAMES WHEN BUSINESS IS CONDUCTED UNDER AN ASSUMED NAME. AN ACT providing that when any business, other than a ... "
    Am including below links which may help other folks trying to find their State's Session Laws. I was looking for Session Laws, any referencing to the laws by title chapter etc, tho this site gives summaries of each state, not referencing the laws.
    Also, we thought to look on the states Sec of State forms for filing names to see if the law was referenced on the form itself. Some do have it referenced, some don't. When a form did reference the law we searched online to see if we could find it there.

    http://dbafilingonline.com/dba-by-state/

    Louisiana: Here's something, but we can't tell if this is what we need in citing Session Law appropriate for Anna's Certificate of Assumed Name,or not, & what part we should copy onto the form:
    Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:281.2 – Assumed name restrictions
    https://www.lawserver.com/law/state/louisiana/la-laws/louisiana_revised_statutes_51-281-2

    At the bottom of this page is a list of states - didn't help us, but you may find it useful
    https://www.infotaxsquare.com/

    Still searching for Session Laws & maybe Law Universities could be a source in the state you're searching :
    https://www.law.uga.edu/researching-legislative-history-enacted-georgia-statute

    http://law.mercer.edu/library/georgia/

    and other sites, & of course look around for your specifics, am posting what we bookmarked :
    http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/gacode/Default.asp

    http://georgiainfo.galileo.usg.edu/topics/government/article/general-assembly/state-capitol

    Where would We the Peeps be without Anna Von Reitz & her devoted team, specifically? Where in this hell hole would we be!? Dearest Anna & Team, thank you for your sanity, humanity, intellect, reasoning, dedication, perseverance, generosity - really thank you for being who you really are. Once we have access to financial assistance, we shall make generous donations to y'all. We are counting our pennies & doing laundry by hand!
    As soon as we awaken enough to roll out of our corpse'orations holes 6 feet under, peek above ground zero from our graves into which we've been buried alive, we will climb outta our zombie state onto OUR terra firma Land Jurisdiction of OUR God Almighty. And that is in part why this is called a Spiritual War.
    Hope this helps, Good Folks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WW, thanks. I went to google and typed in some of these words, and came up with it saying 0. Nothing there in my neck of the woods (Ohio).
      Session Law is not the name of ''a Law''. It means Laws that were done in each of our state legislatures. For mine, it does not appear they have done any of this, which is hard to believe. Could it be this stuff is deliberately being hidden?
      Anyhow, it seems that these Laws may be different in each state and that we would have to go by whatever our individual state laws say about it. ?
      It is an outrage to be in the 21st century and that anyone would have to do laundry by hand and count pennies. Gee, aren't we lucky that they haven't abolished the penny, yet!! Oh we should be so grateful to these pieces of turd !

      It seems the more answers we get, the more questions we run into. I think we have to make sure we do this right, and I don't feel we have reached concreteness yet.

      I think we have a host of personal stories among us, I have a family member falling apart because he can't find a job as he is ''too old''worried where money will come from to live on; I have a sibling who is terminal and refuses to face that fact; our White House is a complete mystery; we have a chess game going on regarding war; we have a haarp game going on; we have a gov. that wants rid of us 'peons'; this fake gov. is bankrupt; and just about nobody knows where they are going.
      God is fed up ''to here' with this whole bowl full of scrambled eggs, and about to show the world what He really thinks. We haven't seen anything yet, and if you're not on the right side of God, it is just not gonna be pretty.
      I'm just as fed up as He is, but I'm ever so grateful for the good that we do have at our house.
      And grateful for the few people in our corner, like Anna et al.
      (Can you feel she is working on something real important? Thats why we haven't heard from her in days now; thats how you can tell, lol)
      P.S. Donald? Have you accepted the job yet?? Curious minds want to know.

      Delete
    2. Abby -Thanks for your response. How similarly we think. Your: Could it be this stuff is deliberately being hidden?- is EXACTLY what i say it is, deliberately removing our access. Over & over access is w a registration, membership, etc as to a law library, state site, archives. Once signed up... the info sought isn't there.
      Am so sorry for your familial circumstances. We are so close & with it we will do phenomenal things, making our lives better, healthier,healing, freer, more abundant & alive. This state of deprivation isn't who we are, oh no, we are bountiful, generous, exactly what the beast isn't.
      Curiously, Louisiana in 1913, had a constitutional convention in the state adopted a re-codification of the constitution of 1898. 1913! Same year the Fed Reserve was concocted. Its kept 'un-obvious'.
      YES we need to keep focus on submitting our ANNA PAPERS! Am so close i could spit! Need the language from the Session Laws, but can't find the original Session Laws on Assumed Trade Names. Wonder if we can use the recent amended versions? How can we be wrong if our access is denied & must use the best we can find? Hells bells we gotta make it happen asap, send in our docs & be DONE w the beast as it flails in death throws! Grab the sword w me Abby & go for its black heart! Uuurrrgh!
      Have been working on ANNA PAPERS previous versions & now to see her post this EZ version, am ecstatic, chomping at the bit. Just don't know if editing this is apropos:
      http://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?p=y&d=104449
      RS 51:281
      SUBPART C. ASSUMED BUSINESS NAMES
      §281. Registration; condition precedent to licensing
      No person shall transact any business under an assumed name or under any designation, name or style, corporate or otherwise, other than the real name of the individual conducting the business, unless such person files in the office of the register of conveyances in the city of New Orleans, or the clerk of court, as the case may be, of the parish or parishes in which the person conducts or intends to conduct the business, a certificate setting forth the name under which the business is to be conducted and the real full name of the person owning, conducting or transacting the business, with the post office address of such person. This certificate shall be executed and duly acknowledged before a notary public by the person conducting or intending to conduct the business....
      Ahh ha ha yeah, can feel Anna's absence as stirrings of power. Hope Donald steps upon our Land Jurisdiction while we're chopping a path w machetes right behind Anna Team in the lead!

      Delete
  37. From Anna:

    Abby,
    There are two forms of records --- those that are recorded (land jurisdiction) and those that are registered (sea jurisdiction).


    Their "County Recorders" are actually "County of Recorders" --- and as such, are producing records of the international land jurisdiction.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paul & Anna thanks for the tip!: "Their "County Recorders" are actually "County of Recorders" --- and as such, are producing records of the international land jurisdiction."
      So those items recorded are waiting for us to claim for our land jurisdiction?? So the good news is there's documentation of our historical land jurisdiction acts, not only for the pira'sea corpse'oration.
      Curious how they co-mingle assets, interests of land & sea w/o proper notice via invisible contracts.
      But how to find our Session Laws on Assumed Names so we can fill out the documentation to escape these despicable pirates? We gotta move fast, time is of the essence. Spent 3 days scouting for that rascal! Urrgghh, sooo close, yet so far. Thanks, y'all.

      Delete
    2. W W, again, we do think alike. We know these assets belong to us, and so do they. Why should we have to do cartwheels and jump over a building to get what is ours. We and they already know we got officially documented by our BC's. Now, it just seems to me there ought to be a much simpler way to stake our claim, perhaps by providing the Copy of our BC which is all we were really issued in the first place......as they know they stole all our Original Certificate of Live Birth and stashed it in the Archives!
      Why should we have to go digging for their session laws and quote their stuff back to them anyhow!
      Just like our cars have a VIN # on them. That is proof that it belongs to us, and thats all we need to provide. We don't have to go digging for the laws they made which provides for that VIN #......we just simply provide it.
      So in short, this just seems to be a very long way around to simply being able to stake our claim. Gimme a danged claim form, let me give them my ''I mean business here, Mister'' stare, and they will get that I am ME! Why are we tap dancing to THEIR tunes??

      Delete
    3. Please tell me "what is ours." What CLAIM and what property? Will filing pieces of paper make you immune in the courts? Discharge fraudulent bank "loans?" Will it let you claim TDA bonds worth billions that US Treasury is holding in our name & numbers? Yes someone please explain the practicality of all this. The droll esoteric code seems all about controlling resources, rhetorical justifications of ruthlessness and mean motives, don't get bogged down in it.

      Delete
    4. dean germeten - we're not ignoring ya, just so you know. We're just so busy trying to find our stuff. In the course of things you, we, will have to address each of the things you question, & we also question.
      As we progress we'll learn how to navigate. And... THEY will learn to accept that we have arrived. So 'it' won't do those things, we'll have to do it, while some things may be recognized, it'll be up to us to claim them.
      So filing the EZ paper won't discharge debt, but may allow you to do it yourself. From what i get out on the internet, the 2 accounting systems aren't connected. So our debt system doesn't have access to our credit system, cuz they hid it. So we'll connect them.
      i don't know for instance if THEY will provide us a card showing we aren't PERSONS, CITIZENS, ok. So if we're stopped for a traffic violation, we'll have to address it ourselves. In time one imagines the gov thugs will be recognizing more of us & abide more readily.
      As for accessing accounts, i don't know how it will work. From what i see out there Folks use a routing number & account number, which some say is your SSN & have evidenced the connection to Banks.
      Yea the droll code is exactly about controlling our everything. Horror upon horror & the volumes claiming control & taxation of our everything multiple times over & over. This last La Session is despicable... they are just thieves & pillagers scraping our shoe soles for evidence to taxing the dirt we displaced! GET ME OUTTA HERE!

      Delete
  38. Well, this Certificate is playing bad tricks with my blood pressure.
    I cannot do one by quoting session laws from a state I don't live in
    and when I went to try a different way to find anything on it for my location Ohio, there is nothing there.
    So 'I'm still sitting here in the dugout, chewing bubble gum, and complaining about all the chewing tobacco spit and sunflower seed shells stuck in my shoes, seething cause I'm not gonna get to bat today''.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I was searching for "session laws of Idaho". I stumbled on a link by MISSPELLING the word Idaho as IDOH. session laws idoh netted the link:

    https://www.bing.com/search?q=session+laws+idaho+1895-7+book&qs=SC&pq=session+laws+idoh&sc=1-17&cvid=81137545B4EF43B096017A74A84453AD&FORM=QBLH&sp=1

    I went to that page. The top link was:

    https://archive.org/details/sessionslaws99stateleg

    But no way to VIEW the document. After clicking around for a bit I selected the hyperlink AMERICANA on the COLLECTION line and it took me to a TON of old books. I typed SESSION LAWS into the search term...... BANG!

    https://archive.org/details/americana?and[]=session%20laws

    Next time I put in SESSION LAWS IDAHO and got a bunch of old Idaho law books.

    THESE ARE ALL DIGITIZED BOOKS FREE FOR THE READING OF ANYONE.

    Here is the thing. Every time I tried to find stuff spelled CORRECTLY I was lead to stupid stuff. I found this by ACCIDENT!

    I don't have a clue what I am looking for here so if anyone out there knows and finds this useful I would most certainly appreciate some guidance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnIdahoFamily - or shall i say an Idoh Family! THANK YOU -
      this is a hoot! Found by misspelling. Now ain't that a fly in the bourbon. Wow,this is a terrific find archive.org... can barely come up for air.
      https://archive.org/stream/sessionslaws99stateleg#page/n473/mode/2up
      Ohhh found the "Republic of Hawaii 1895" How cool is that?!
      from your archive.org Americana link to https://archive.org/details/hawaiisessionla00hawagoog

      Here is general Corporation Laws, Michigan, it was labeled Louisiana, but someone from Michigan may benefit from this link
      https://archive.org/details/generalcorporat00commgoog

      What a lucky IDOH it was. Ok, as for a clue, look at the language from the EZ Anna Papers http://annavonreitz.com/certificateofassumedname.pdf

      When i copied this from Anna's EZ paper :
      SESSIONS LAW 145;1907; CHAPTER 145 [H.B.64] OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; it went to these 3 pages: http://leg.wa.gov/CodeReviser/documents/sessionlaw/1907c145.pdf
      I wanted to see it to get a hint as to what to look for. Anyhoo, see if you can find the same kind of language. Under corporate filings, today usually filed under Secretary of State tho they don't show laws on their sites. May have more to share later. Thanks again, Idoh!

      Delete
    2. AnIdahoFamily - ok IDOH, thanks to your contribution, am well entertained this evening.
      Like here, on the book page 180, bottom of the site page says 212/1058 on CORPORATIONS
      https://archive.org/stream/revisedstatutel00louigoog#page/n210/mode/2up
      But at this time the District Attorney approved corporations, recorded in the office of the recorder.
      Ok, so its page 182 w site page 214/1058 about Corporations. don't see Session Laws, per se. It might be too early for such laws, acts, so will need a more recent one. This is 1869. So as Anna shows Washington states Session Law is 1907.
      Have gone thru the library & can't find what am looking for under Louisiana. Will do it again under Georgia.
      Thanks again IDOH.

      Delete
  40. I just went to google and typed in Session Law on Assumed Names
    and got this for new jersey, where it appears you simply have to provide a notarized certificate with name and address and file it at Recorders office. ??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Forgot to give this: lawjustia.com/codes/new-jersey/2013/title-56/section-56-1-2

      Delete
    2. Abby - thanks for the link ... tho when i used Yahoo may have altered the results, as its a list of attorney's. Will adjust the link & try from Bing. Rascal Yahoo! Ugh, just tried typing it in & it flew to Yahoo. Aghh, did it again. Can't seem to bring up the link, it goes to Yahoo w attorney lists.
      since I can't see it yet, read Anna's section & find if the language conveys similarly. Copy its title & language that says what Anna's says. Hope this helps.
      Want to access lawjustia to see it it has Louisiana & Georgia. Wish i could read your NJ Session Law, just the bit for the Anna Papers, see the language.

      Delete
    3. Silly Silly. Screw the search engine. Just put the information in the URL bar with www. in front of it. I did that and my Bing (default search engine, CHANGE YOURS from Yahoo) brought the site up right on top. Here is the text.

      2013 New Jersey Revised Statutes
      Title 56 - TRADE NAMES, TRADE-MARKS AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES
      Section 56:1-2 - Certificates of true names when assumed names used; contents; filing; appointment by nonresidents of county clerk as attorney for service of process

      Universal Citation: NJ Rev Stat § 56:1-2 (2013)

      56:1-2. Certificates of true names when assumed names used; contents; filing; appointment by nonresidents of county clerk as attorney for service of process
      No person shall conduct or transact business under any assumed name, or under any designation, name or style, corporate or otherwise, other than the real name or names of the individual or individuals conducting or transacting such business, unless such person shall file a certificate in the office of the clerk of the county or counties in which such person conducts or transacts, or intends to conduct or transact, such business, together with a duplicate thereof for filing in the office of the Secretary of State, as provided in section 56:1-3 of this Title. Such certificate shall set forth the name under which such business is conducted or transacted, or is to be conducted or transacted, and the true name or names of the person or persons conducting or transacting the same, with his or their post-office address or addresses, and shall be duly executed and sworn to by the person or persons conducting or transacting, or intending to conduct or transact, such business, before some person authorized by the laws of this State to administer oaths and if any person or persons conducting or transacting business as aforesaid is or are not resident in this State, such statement shall contain a power of attorney constituting the county clerk of the county, his successors in office, the true and lawful attorney of said nonresident person or persons, upon whom all original process in an action or legal proceeding against said person or persons for any debt, damages or liability, contracted or incurred by them in, or growing out of, the conduct or transaction of said business, may be served and therein he or they shall agree that such original process which may be served on the county clerk shall be of the same force and validity as if served upon said nonresident person or persons and that the authority thereof shall continue in force so long as the person or persons conduct or transact said business in this State.

      Amended by L.1951, c. 255, p. 901, s. 2.

      Delete
    4. Abby - thanks, dawlin' for posting the language. Yep i use Bing too. Now, is this what we need for the Anna Papers, & i ask becuz Anna references SESSIONS
      LAW 145;1907; CHAPTER 145 [H.B.64] OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON;
      Sessions Law from 1907. At the bottom of your post it says Amended by L. 1951, c 225, p 901, s. 2. So ought we find that to see if its the Sessions Law itself? Or do we used these Amended codes?
      Thats what i question. I can find the current Amended code, but do we need to show the Session Law itself? I recall Anna directing us to Sessions Law so there must be a good reason, rather than current Amended code. Humm.

      Meanwhile, if anyone is interested in Georgia 1926: https://archive.org/stream/georgiacode1926a00unde#page/512/mode/1up page 511 CORPORATIONS - at this point a charter must be made for a corporation to exist; created by General Assembly & courts; Then pg 512 see 2992: Application for charter, etc; unlawful use of name. Then Foreign Corporations pg 515.

      Delete
    5. From the Citation that AnIdaho posted, it looks to me that a Certificate is for the purpose of setting forth our Name and address under which we ''will do business'' and having it notarized, whereby we swear that the info on the Certificate is true, etc. So what more is needed than that for any Certificate, or what other purpose does it serve?
      It also looks to me at least from the NJ folks, that a Certificate is only needed if we have been using an assumed name, and now need to clarify all that by using a Certificate of our Real Name.
      Hell, what do I know.

      I can tell you this tho, if I were to follow what I saw for Ohio, which seems to relate to a dba and is related to a Business, I would be opening a whole big can of worms; I would be getting papers from the Tax Dept. telling me I need to get a business license and tax ID # and it would get all sticky.
      See what I mean?

      Delete
  41. 1FreeMan can you send me an email at ymcmia77@gmail.com I would like to ask a few more question regarding this process

    ReplyDelete
  42. W W, from what I've read/seen, Session Law is not ''a Law''. It simply refers to Laws that have been made during state legislative law making sessions. It is just to inform where the Law originated from.....just like we would quote a Decision made by the supreme court of 'just-asses'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Abby - yes Session Law isn't a law. Ha ha 'just-asses' - needed that laugh. Even to find the volume of Session Law for a bill that originated the Corporate / Assumed Names language is IMPOSSIBLE. the state gov site is horrible, restrictive, & worse. No archives-why spend money on our history, when all they want us to see is what they throw into our faces SURPRISE! you just broke a law & here's your fine.
      Well am getting nowhere finding the Session Law for the House Bill regarding Assumed Names. Its a real separation of gov from the people. Horrendous volumes upon volumes to benefit their corporate gov thuggery.
      Folks can't do this process. Its only for those w inside access knowledge & wealth to do it. While we're told to do this & be free, it goes nowhere. Run on the hamster wheel for days pursing this item, document, language etc... & it goes nowhere. For those who can't afford it, good.
      Whats particularly painful to see is right at the top of our state constitutions its says this is for PERSONS. Everything is for the dead, the corpse'oration. To change status is an ultimate dream. To stand as woman, man free of those leeches a dream come true.
      I've spent 4 days searching for the proper language House Bill from Session Laws. It is not to be found. Sooo am thinking to use what i can find, a Revised Statute.
      Has anyone used the EZ method w success that can help us?

      Delete
  43. Anyone here from hawaii? If so where can I get this done? I'm in Illinois and am going back home to try and get this done, thanks. Or can I do it online?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jolly Walls - not from Hawaii but look at links posted above for references. Abby also posted Duckduckgo search engine - shows more info, less programmed, paid sites. Hang in there... We gotta get outta this matrix! Sooo close, soo close, we can do this.

      Delete
  44. There is a new search engine that so many are using, since google is censoring so much information that ''they'' don't want us to see.
    www.duckduckgo.com I haven't been there yet, but it censors nothing, hides nothing, and does not store our info or track people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Abby and WW, you both have mentioned Louisiana. I'm a Louisianan. I was able to find under https://books.google.com the "Acts passed by The General Assembly of the State of Louisiana at the Regular Session, held in the city of Baton Rouge on the thirteenth day of May, 1918" at page 97-98 Senate Bill No. 68, Act No. 64. To regulate the carrying on of business under assumed or fictitious name and to provide penalties for the violation thereof. Approved June 27, 1918. It seems to be verbatim to The State of Washington chapter 145 [HB 64]. See if you can find and check to see if this is what we are supposed to find. I still cannot find the state's (Louisiana)session law preserving your common law right to do this. I am praying that Anna will respond to verify. Thank you..

      Delete
    2. michael! Bon ami! Laissez les bons temps rouler! EXCELLENT find. Ohhh this has got to be it. What a treasure you have found. Surely this is it. Surely.
      Do you think its important becuz this was in place prior to the 1913 Fed Resv coup, thus applicable?
      Also, look what they did in 1913?? Were those vermin doing the same thing to Louisiana they did to the united States? Wonder whom were involved in that snare? Luther P Hall was gov. Save that research for another day.
      https://ballotpedia.org/Louisiana_Constitution
      "Louisiana's current constitution, the version adopted in 1974, is its ninth constitution. The previous versions were adopted in 1812, 1845, 1852, 1864, 1868, 1879, 1898 and 1921. In 1913, a constitutional convention in the state adopted a re-codification of the constitution of 1898. The re-codification was not submitted to the state's voters for ratification, and some observers do not therefore count it as a new constitution.[2]"
      Merci, merci, merci beaucoup! Surely this is it!
      Now for Georgia, i was born a peach, as papa was in the Army. Otherwise we're from along the Bayou Teche.

      Delete
    3. michael -found a tip using duckduckgo search (thanks Abby):
      Legislative History Research Guide http://www.lasc.org/law_library/RESGUID1.pdf
      " To compile a legislative history before 1996, you will need the bill number, year and session. To
      get the bill number, call the Law Library of Louisiana at 504-310-2515 (800-820-3038 outside the
      New Orleans area) for the bill number with the act number, year and session in hand. Act
      numbers are in the historical notes in West’s Louisiana Statutes Annotated. Once you get the bill
      number, order the legislative history from the House or Senate Docket. "

      Wests Louisiana Session Law
      https://duckduckgo.com/?q=West%27s+Louisiana+Session+Law%2C+Common+Law&t=h_&ia=web

      Wests Louisiana Session Law, Common Law
      https://duckduckgo.com/?q=West%27s+Louisiana+Session+Law%2C+Common+Law&t=h_&ia=web

      Delete
    4. michael - a Tulane green colored resource page
      http://www.tulane.edu/~cpritch/STATE%20LEGISLATIVE%20HISTORY.htm

      Louisiana Supreme Court http://www.lasc.org/law_library/library_information.asp (ih gawd, how telling is this: "Law Day 2017 The 14th Amendment Transforming American Democracy" - right on the supreme court page - democracy - i mean, how hard they are pushing that garbage propaganda. Exactly what Empire wants, democracy. Point being, we gotta get outta this mess asap!

      Delete
    5. michael - found this on Session Law but don't know how t access it yet.
      http://l20013.eos-intl.net/L20013/OPAC/Details/Record.aspx?IndexCode=15&TaskCode=970042&HitCount=14&CollectionCode=2&SortDirection=Ascending&CurrentPage=1&CurrentLinkCode=ML20013|2271742|1|9972331&SelectionType=0&SearchType=1&BibCode=ML20013|2271742|1|9972331

      i started out here at the bottom Database links & Library Catalog, then put in a search (weird criteria to choose from) using Session Law in the year 1900-1920
      Back to the 1st link, top title, i clicked the authors name went here
      http://l20013.eos-intl.net/L20013/OPAC/Search/AdvancedSearch.aspx

      Still can't access the material. Agghhh & Poo Yie!

      Delete
  45. WW, you stated: Do you think its important becuz this was in place prior to the 1913 Fed Resv coup, thus applicable?

    From M: Acts passed by The General Assembly of the State of Louisiana at the Regular Session, held in the city of Baton Rouge on the thirteenth day of May, 1918"

    So it was not in place in 1913, I don't think. Unless there is some sort of Common Core Math formula I have not heard about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnIdahoFamily - Oh wondering if it, as in Anna's 1907 reference was important. In reference to your question why La is important, its becuz we're trying to find the proper language for the EZ Anna Papers. We're doing one for La.
      If someone is interested in researching their laws, many of the links may apply, just type in your state, such as law school sites.
      Also the way we find things, words used helps everyone in their search.

      Delete
  46. Someone remind me why Lousyanna is important?

    ReplyDelete
  47. did anyone come across the Session Laws for Michigan?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. native american - check out the methods used to search above. copy & paste on word page. then go to the site & see if you can type in search, see if Michigan info comes up. Its arduous & time consuming, lots of reading & aggravating but its what we're doing.
      Since am looking for Louisiana & Georgia, am not focused on Michigan. Of course if we come upon something relevant we can let you know.
      Such as this post : AnIdahoFamilySeptember 3, 2017 at 4:53 PM, then after the word : ...... BANG! is this link
      https://archive.org/details/americana?and[]=session%20laws
      Go to it & poke around.
      Gosh wish i could help & have each state listed w language. I'm as deep in the swamp as you are.. well maybe coming from Louisiana i know a thing or two about swamps, like: That is NOT a log! We are sooo close!

      Delete
    2. thanx wink...

      if you find something else plz let us know!

      Delete
  48. Why are all these youtube videos' out there giving out all this information even Anna herself giving out all this information that she have not even used herself, have not tested before giving information out. They are just throwing stuff out there. People be careful, even of Anna she have not tried this information out herself before giving it out to the public..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL I guess you actually did read the article so nice work! There are plenty of places to troll so please scurry off.

      "We have tested this method of securing your name and estate and it has worked 100% of the time with much less muss and fuss than other methods, including methods we used ourselves in the past."

      Delete
  49. Why do you need to FIND the language? Why was it not put out there with the rest of the information?????????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnIdahoFamily - finding the language & reading it helps us to know what it says. Then we can attempt to find similar language at the appropriate time for our state in which we were born & living in, to use in our EZ Anna Papers.
      It isn't 'out there' for us to find becuz its hidden. Sometimes hidden in plain sight. Sometimes just plain hidden. Thats what makes this all a fraud & why we desire to extrapolate ourselves from their false claims against living men & women whom they have defrauded & are absconding with our identities, land jurisdiction & wealth.
      If we can show them, as on paper w our marks upon it & a witness of Notary saying we presented ourselves with their ascribed proper identity forms (BC, DL, finger print, autograph etc), that we are alive & here to claim our NAME, ESTATES etc they created w/o our knowledge under the guise that we were dead &/or abandoned our property, then they can't con us (as readily).
      In so evidencing & giving them notice, we are calling their fraud scheme for what it is. So we say there's a fraud going on here & this is my remedy, so fix it immediately. The vermin ought to then recognize it & return our stuff, recognize we are of the Land Jurisdiction & leave us women men alone. Hope this helps.

      Delete
  50. michael - LOUISIANA Book 1914 Code Of Practice Including legislative session 1914... Constitution of 1913
    INDEX:for 'Corporations' go to screen pg 800/847 which is book pg 784
    https://archive.org/stream/codepracticelou01wolfgoog#page/n798/mode/2up

    ReplyDelete
  51. michael of Louisiana & Good Folks - for those having no success in finding the laws, language to use see the statement below. Louisiana is tough. It says it would be strong if you add your own (state's) Session Law. See if this helps:

    Clarification Regarding Copyright to Your Trade Name
    http://annavonreitz.com/copyrighttradename.pdf
    On page 4 of 4 :
    ****Since this is issued in international land jurisdiction, you can use the citations from Washington and Alaska above to claim equal treatment under the law even if you can't find the similar Session Law in your state of the Union. It would just be stronger if you add your own Session Law in support of the claim.****

    ReplyDelete
  52. Anyone searching for Georgia, this may help :
    University of Georgia
    Legislative Research: Bills and Public Laws: Georgia Bills & Session Laws
    http://guides.libs.uga.edu/c.php?g=349650&p=2360369

    ReplyDelete
  53. Anna contradicts her own Affidavit. An American Affidavit of Probable Cause by Anna Maria Riezinger, page 136 Your Given Name is Your Private Property. page 137 Though most contemporary names are typically much shorter and simpler, they nonetheless provide descriptive information and express the gift of a parent to their child. Nothing could be more intimate or sacred. A large share of the abuse that the banks and their governmental services companies have promoted has been the theft of our given names and the pretension that our Mothers knowingly named their corporation the Trustee of our ESTATES and allowed these same entities to issue bonds based on the value of our ESTATES - that is, to enslave and indebt us. They have even claimed to own our given names via registration, but in fact, our Mothers had already given our names to us and absent that gift, the names would not exist! It wasn't available to give to any corporation. It was already yours. Page 138 This outrageous IDENTITY THEFT SCHEME is a FIDUCIARY TRUST FRAUD that has been operated against innocent Americans by privately owned and operated banking cartels and governmental services corporations trading upon "The Constitution for the united States of America". By what authority am I required to do anything at all as long as I am doing no harm to another living being? To say we must copyright our own name (a sacred gift from our Mother) is to allow the cretins to get away with crimes committed against us. How insane is that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your response is incomprehensible. You make an accusation but do little, if any (as far as I can tell), to back up that claim.

      Delete
  54. In California the clerk looks in her book and comes back and tells me no provision to file. Anyone in Calif able to get something like this filed? Anyone in California able to file something in Lamar and then file in California something they previously would not file?

    ReplyDelete
  55. Does anyone know how to complete the Deed of Reconveyance? Where do we get the information from to put on the document from?

    ReplyDelete
  56. "No provision to file".....????? How about the CONSTITUTION?

    ReplyDelete
  57. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Wow. Keep pushing. You're closer than a lot of us! Can you email me your deed of reconveyance or your template? I don't even know where to get that and nobody will reply to my comments. Thank you! tvwalls2@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. its best you get the form your state uses.

      Delete
  59. Even after filing my Deed of Reconveyance with two attachments using Judge Anna's examples, AND having it successfully recorded in Lamar County Georgia, my California county still would not accept it. They said it doesn't fulfill their filing requirements for a Deed of Reconveyance which is intended for loan repayment on real estate property. They said I needed to have the original owner (Trustee) of the property, even though I explained I am the original owner. Maybe if I put my parents names as the original Trustees? But I also need the original "deed". Basically with California, it looks like I can't get there (record my lawfully given trade name) from here (Deed of Reconveyance) per their rules.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Donald, every state has a law that says that a county recorder may record your document if it is recorded or filed in any public recording office in the United States. Here it is for NJ:
    NJ Rev Stat § 46:26A-4 (2013)
    46:26A-4. Exceptions to prerequisites to recording.
    Notwithstanding the prerequisites to recording in N.J.S.46:26A-3, the following may be recorded:
    g. certified copies of:
    (3)documents recorded or filed in any public recording office in the United States;
    Just find the one for your state, print it out and bring it with you to your county recorder. However, they can still argue over the word "may". My county recorder refused it simply because it did not look like a deed. I have not refiled it yet but when I do I will probably reformat and style the whole thing to make it look like any other deed, refile it in GA and then bring it back into my county with all the filing attachments they require for any other deed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for your suggestions. I am quite sure that my California county recording clerk is a hard line type and is interpreting "may" to mean they do not have to accept it if it doesn't meet their standards.

      I had already used the same Deed type form my California uses, but the recorders were still thrown by the fact that it wasn't real estate and there was no previous owner or "trustee" of the property.

      Delete
    3. Hey Donald, I quoted you a NJ statute. It may read different in CA. However, in rereading the statute, I just realized that "the following may be recorded" means that YOU may record it and that they cannot object except perhaps in the filing procedure and if so they must help you by explaining how to correct it so that it can be recorded. IOW: they cannot deny you and say that you may NOT record it. I would start a paper trail. I read somewhere that once you mail it to the County Recorder Registered Mail, that it is already considered recorded and that they must provide you with a valid and lawful reason if they reject your recording. But then you will have their reason on paper which is actionable. IOW: they will have to counter your MAY record statute with a MAY NOT statute which they do not have. Then you respond and state: "The law states that I may record this document and you cannot deny recording this pursuant to Statute XXXX since it is already recorded elsewhere. Please provide the statute and code you are relying on to justify your denial. Or, if you have determined an error in the filing, please state how to correct the filing that it may be recorded." Put the monkey on their back. Usually all you get back with your documents is a fluff form letter without any reason simply stating that they cannot record your documents hoping you will simply go away. You have to take them to task to prove their position or to record it. Put up or shut up! The only valid argument they could have is the "prerequisites to recording" which you can simply counter with "Please provide me the prerequisites to recording that will allow my document to be recorded."
      If you are doing this in person, a GREAT question to always ask them is: "Are you making a legal determination?" which will make them recoil at once. You can also ask them: "Who do I complain to if you cannot help me?" They don't like that either.

      Delete
    4. Donald, how about this? The county recorder shall not refuse to record any instrument, paper, or notice that is authorized or required by statute, court order, or local ordinance that relates to the recordation of any instrument, paper, or notice that relates to real property to be recorded on the basis of its lack of legal sufficiency." 27201.(a) located here: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=27201

      Delete
    5. Wow, 1FreeMan, that looks awesome! I expect to use it soon!

      Delete
  61. Thanks, 1FreeMan. All good suggestions. I've dealt with this head recorder twice now, (the first time through her underling) and I can almost predict how she will respond. Yet I love your question "Are you making a legal determination?"

    She has already pointed me in the direction of the law library. I have no idea how long it will take me to find the appropriate California statute. I do think its time to begin a paper trail, but in my mailed in filing, I hope to be able to reference the California statute that says I MAY file it in my current country once it has been filed elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.