Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Wednesday, February 1, 2023

Forwarding a Grenade

 By Anna Von Reitz

You will note that the so-called Germ Theory of viruses has never been proven.  Rather, the existence of viruses has been inferred from other things --- symptoms of cold symptoms and the proven existence of bacteria, for example. 

The genesis of The Germ Theory of viruses was built on the existence of bacteria and symptoms caused by bacterial infections.  The idea was that if bacteria, (which are orders of magnitude larger than viruses), caused disease, then why not postulate the existence of disease-causing agents that were much, much smaller, but still doing the same thing?  

Viruses. 

Over time this theory has been questioned effectively and many scientists now recognize "viruses" as "exosomes" --- nanocapsules that carry waste products out of the cell and into the bloodstream whenever the cells are under stress and need to jettison waste products-- which are often scraps of protein chains or DNA or bits of other substances.  

In The Exosome Theory, these little packets of waste cause allergic or inflammatory responses simply because they are waste products of cellular metabolism and need to be escorted out of the body the same way as any other toxic substance.

According to The Exosome Theory, not only are "viruses" dead, having no characteristics of any known living thing, but they cause symptoms of disease because they are toxic--- poisonous, not because they are alive and invading the body like bacteria. 

Obviously, too, the cells must be under stress to produce exosomes in the first place, so something is wrong in River City at the cellular level when exosomes are present. For example, exosomes are present in and around dying liver cells, but it was a poison, alcohol, that caused the liver cells to die and to produce the exosomes in the first place.

The strongest thing The Exosome Theory has going for it,  is that it makes logical sense and fits the facts; while The Germ Theory extrapolated to create the concept of "viruses" based on the existence and behavior of bacteria really doesn't.  

Bacteria have cause to invade hosts and set up shop, but a non-living thing like a virus does not.  

A dog may seek shelter and food, but a garbage bag is just a garbage bag full of crud. It may be moved from Point A to Point B, but not of its own volition, and it gains no advantage either way. The so-called "replication" of viruses can  be explained in terms of sick cells producing more of the same kind of waste and bundling it up in the same kind of exosome wrapper for disposal.

All this to say that The Germ Theory is not the settled truism that drug companies and enterprises like The Pasteur Institute and NIH would have us believe--- the very existence of "viruses" is very much in question and always has been. 

For example, a "polio virus" was the theoretical culprit causing the outbreak of polio in the 1950's, but there are other credible explanations. 

Just before "polio" became an epidemic, farmers started using certain pesticides on fruit orchards. Those pesticides were water-soluble neurotoxins that could easily cause the symptoms of "polio" and also cause the poisoned cells to produce characteristic "polio" exosomes.  

The advantage of The Germ Theory is that it kept suspicion off the petrochemical industry and let them quietly remove the pesticides from the market, minus millions of damage claims.  Bereaved parents and crippled children could blame a "germ" too tiny for anyone to see, instead of Dow Chemical.  

Let him who will be deceived, be deceived.  My Shinola Sensors know what to believe, just as they knew what to believe about Agent Orange.  

With this little discussion as background, let's take stock of this report from Jon Rappoport (The Last Living American Journalist other than James O'Keefe) who interviewed the same Pfizer Executive that Project Veritas caught on camera.  

We have no explanation for why this particular half-dead Pfizer Executive has chosen to come forward and provide all this provocative information, except perhaps that there is still a human ghost alive inside the machine. Continue reading Jon's report below: 

The Pfizer exec who confessed to Project Veritas now tells me the whole truth

And nothing but the truth about the virus and the vaccine---in the back room of an Irish bar after a few Bushmills

FEB 1

Last Saturday, I woke up to the sounds of my pigs squealing out on the land. My wolves were herding them back into their pens.

I struggled out of bed and plowed through the 16 messages on my cell. FOX, CBS, NBC, CNN, etc. They somehow knew I was on to The One, and they were clamoring and pleading for an exclusive.

No dice.

My agent and lawyer, Gloria Torquemada, showed up as I as was downing my 4th cup of coffee. Her CIA contacts had located Jordan Walker, the suddenly infamous Pfizer exec. He was now waiting in Mick Flaherty’s bar 16 miles away from my farm. I called Tucker and told him to hold on, I’d get back to him by nightfall.

I donned my white coat, hung a stethoscope around my neck, pinned an old Blockbuster member card to my chest pocket (“Jon Rappoport, MD”), and we were off in the Bentley.

An hour later, Jordan and I were sitting in Mick’s back room. We had a few drinks and chatted. Maybe more than a few.

Then this is what followed:

What about the virus, Jordan?

What about it?

The isolation problem.

Oh, THAT.

Yeah.

You get right down to it, Jon.

Time is money.

Of course. Well, you have to promise, first, that none of what I tell you in this conversation will go public. This is on background only.

Of course. I would never reveal your comments.

OK, good. So, the virus. Well, scientists never actually FIND a new virus. They INFER its existence.

Infer it from what?

A bunch of presumptions about their own lab procedures.

What they’re doing in the lab—

Is really just a hodge-podge of mumbo-jumbo. They don’t isolate anything. And then, using computer programs, they stitch together genetic sequences for “the virus.” These sequences are metaphors.

Metaphors?

Mythical science.

So there is no proof SARS-CoV-2 exists.

No more proof than, say, “demonstrating” there is a bath house on Mars. Or a gay caballero is roaming the galaxy singing Country and Western.

But—

But we need these metaphors. They satisfy so many interests.

Not least of all, vaccine manufacturers.

Right. If there are no viruses, why would we produce and sell vaccines?

Then all this talk about Pfizer intentionally mutating the virus and giving it more power…which is what you told Project Veritas…is sheer nonsense?

No, not nonsense. High level bullshit.

Explain.

It’s simple. 99.999 percent of virologists in the world believe their own bullshit. They really think they’re discovering new viruses. They really think they can increase the power of those viruses. They’re actually doing METAPHOR, but they think they’re doing LITERAL.

My, my.

Yes. It’s a WOW. And it works brilliantly. No one wants to rock that boat. Too many people are making too much money and exerting too much political power.

So there is no need for a COVID vaccine.

No. And it’s not actually a vaccine. It’s a shot of nanoparticles. They supposedly instructs cells of the body to produce a spike protein. The nanos contain RNA, which does the instructing. So I’m told.

A lot of rigmarole.

Right.

So why is the injection injuring and killing so many people all over the world?

I don’t know. There are all kinds of theories. The point is, when you screw around with the human body, forcing unnatural processes on it, with genetic material [RNA], there is a ripple effect down the line. Things happen.

Unpredictable things.

Yes. The processes of the body are interlocking. Disturb one process, and you get bad reverberations.

Does Pfizer understand this?

All legitimate researchers realize it. It’s not a secret. The COVID injection is experimental. The open medical literature is very frank about the dangers of putting nanoparticles in humans.

In a sense, Pfizer is a marketing firm.

I would call it a PR firm that is also injuring and killing huge numbers of people. We front for an operation that aims at political control of populations. Hence the lockdowns. The lockdowns were a prime political objective. The fake science—which Pfizer peddles—was the cover story.

So you’re personally corrupt.

Of course.

You don’t care?

I’m just trying to make a good living.

With no conscience.

Having no conscience helps.

It occurs to me that this claim Pfizer is doing gain of function research on the virus could send people up a blind alley.

Well, sure. Because legally, Pfizer can quite probably get off the hook. They can say they’re protecting the public by mutating the virus and developing new vaccines that prevent these more dangerous variants from harming everybody. Whereas, a real court case that attacks the VACCINE for the harm it’s causing…that would be a jackpot. A verdict against Pfizer THERE would be devastating. If you could ever get the case into court…

Then why did you tell Project Veritas about Pfizer mutating the virus?

I was speaking metaphorically.

In what sense?

I was telling Veritas what Pfizer is doing with an imaginary virus. Think of it this way. This is a rough analogy: At the end of World War Two, an exec at a major American corporation tells the New York Times his corporation supplied badly built weapons to US troops in Europe. There is no truth to that, because his company didn’t make weapons—but the real story is, his corporation was supplying vital parts to the US AND Germany. Parts used in factories that manufactured planes. Making money from both sides. But the exec says nothing about THAT.

He pointed the finger at his own company. But for the wrong reason.

Yes.

And that’s what you did when you talked to Project Veritas.

Sort of. Yes.

Why?

I was pissed off about a few things at work I don’t want to go into. And I might have been a little high.

On drugs?

Absolutely not. On one drug. Maybe.

You fucked up.

Obviously.

So what are you going to do now?

I think the question is, what are they going to do to me?

Will you testify in front of Congress?

I doubt they’ll invite me. Pfizer has a lot of clout. And several hundred Congressional legislators and other federal officials don’t want me in public under oath. But if I had to appear, I’d lie. I’d say my comments to Project Veritas were misinterpreted, with no context.

You’d try to bullshit your way out of trouble.

Yes. It’s a time-honored tradition. And think of how many journalists would come to my aid.

Pfizer is evil.

I thought we’d already established that.

Why do so many people work there? Some of them must know it’s a nest of evil.

They have bills to pay. They want to live a comfortable life.

It’s that simple?

For most people, it always is. Look, there’s a guy at Pfizer. He knows everything I’ve been telling you here today. He makes about 700K a year. He snitched to the head of security about a woman in his department who was about to go all whistleblower. He snitched because he wanted to protect Pfizer, the cash cow, who hands him his paycheck every month. That was the long and short of it for him. His paycheck. His standard of living.

The truth, the facts, the crimes meant nothing to him.

Less than nothing.

Were you always corrupt?

I’d say I went through three stages. As a child, I was pretty much like other children. After I went to work for Pfizer and gradually saw what was really happening there, I was troubled. But when I was promoted and got a substantial raise, I settled in. I experienced the perks of my new life.

“The banality of evil.”

Yes. Hannah Arendt’s phrase. To describe the Nazi bureaucrat, Adolph Eichmann.

Didn’t Arendt say Eichmann was unaware, detached? He was following orders in order to advance his career. You’re aware.

I am, but it doesn’t SINK IN. I’m like a researcher who’s designing a death ray shot from space, but focuses on the MATH problems in front of him. In a sense, he knows what he’s doing, but it doesn’t bite him.

The vaccine. It’s a killer.

Yes. But you have to remember, it’s the first vaccine given to so MANY people. I dare say if this was, say, the HPV [Human Papilloma Virus] vaccine, the results would be even worse.

If nobody from the company goes to prison—

We never do. We’re aliens.

Excuse me?

When you settle into one of the big pharmaceutical companies and work there for a decade or more, you’re not quite human anymore.

Is it cold in here? I just felt a chill.

You’re not the first person I’ve talked to who’s told me that.

-- Jon Rappoport

Read Jon's Blog here: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/

Episode 34 of Rappoport Podcasts—“We Are Living In the Era of Nanotechnology, Science Beyond Our Control; A Clear and Present Danger”—is now posted on my substack. It’s a blockbuster....


----------------------------

See this article and over 4000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.  

15 comments:

  1. Correction: Cellular waste is carried out of the body via the lymph fluid, kidneys, then urine. The blood system is not for waste waste disposal, but rather the opposite, as it brings nutrients to the cells. The blood system is alkaline and cannot tolerate acidic cellular (metabolic) waste. P.S. One will not find this information within the medical society.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your cellular waste theory from your medical society priesthood being carried in the urine is blatantly a lie you are perpetuating. The waste is carried out by the intestinal tract. The kidneys regulate the volume and pressure of the circulatory system by removing pure plasma called "plasma ultrafiltrate" aka urine. If the urine has toxic waste within, then so does the blood plasma. We all swam in plasma for 9 months as growing babies. The medical industry pays for plasma donors. They never pay for blood donors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right. This urine narrative is dr morse BS!

      Delete
  3. Actually you were forwarded this grenade well over a year ago. Nothing but shit, ridicule and crickets from you. Guess it just depends on who tells you, huh Anna? You are just another egotist. No longer respect you the way I used to.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow I wonder who the scribes were that made up that tale from their crypts

    I downed my four cups of coffee, told tucker the other fake to hold on and all the others I told no dice

    Yup you meet at public bars and get them drunk on one drink and off to the races they go flappin at the jaws telling you all the corporate secrets

    Quote if I was called in front of the fake congress
    " I’d lie. I’d say my comments to Project Veritas were misinterpreted, with no context."
    Well gee don't they have the CONfessions on tape/video from their body cams?

    You just can't make this shit up but they can
    Q the dun dun dun or the laugh track

    ReplyDelete
  5. Two comments: 1. Louis Pasteur was the court "scientist" for Napoleon III. He was a flaming plagiarist who stole the whole Germ Theory narrative from somebody else. And his dying words were "The germ is nothing, the terrain is everything". 2. John D. Rockefeller, through all of his criminal foundation work, is generally considered to be the father of modern medicine. His father, William Rockefeller, supported his family when John D. was growing up as a literal traveling snake oil salesman.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rappoport's tale is tongue in cheek. It didn't really happen. He tells these stories with truth in them to make a point.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The debate as to whether 'viruses' exist or not aside... John Rappaport is well known for his writing style where he "tells a story" to make a point. He uses fictional accounts to hammer home his point.

    Not sure why this Rappaport article is presented here as an actual account. It would seem anna would know this since she is not new to his work.

    Further evidence of something not quite right with anna.

    ReplyDelete
  8. An absolutely MUST read book, Pasteur Or Bechamp, A lost Chapter In Biology by Ethel Hume.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jons substack is SATIRE. He doesn't own a bentley or have pig herding wolves. Here Anna pretends its all laid out. CLOWNS!

    ReplyDelete
  10. And it was this lead-arsonate that was sold as a pesticide that appeared to be what gave people the symptoms attributed to Polio. It was phased out the same time vaccines made a showing so it LOOKED LIKE vaccines took care of it, when really the pesticide was banned in favor of DDT, another harmful pesticide that was in use for another 50 years...

    https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Lead-arsenate

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Always WASH your fruits. (or grow your own and don't use pesticides) It was Cherries and Apples that were typically sprayed with the lead arsonate and that was why the ones eating such during the spring/summer months got sick with those symptoms of paralysis.

      Delete
  11. Watch the documentary Terrain that came out last year from Dr. Andrew Kauffman. It’s excellent and squashes germ theory.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jon Rappoport was just a story a play off Veritas one. If you want to understand the whole virus nonsense I looked into scripture. Are germ theory and contagious viruses really what we are being told? A look into what scripture reveals.
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT14y9fEKOEZzlVls7uNbA0g1lRfOtMtqbxhpEe7kjVE8fMkMeACP1nugoV-c_ZkI5LVJlJyxGbthWC/pub Also I recommend watching this video with Dr. Mark Bailey. In this episode we speak to New Zealand Dr Mark Bailey who, along with his wife Dr Sam Bailey, advances an innovative and bold theory that viruses - like Covid and others - simply do not exist. The 'No Virus Theory' is his view that virology as a discipline is based upon completely flawed assumptions about the nature of disease. Listen to this show to hear why he and others think this.
    https://odysee.com/@MaajidNawaz:d/38RadicalFull:f

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.