Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Friday, December 7, 2018

Are you caught in the Identity Trap?



Click on the ad to see where it goes and watch the movie!

To help us promote this new ad go here: 

 http://www.annavonreitz.com/bannerads.html

18 comments:

  1. THOUGHT FOR THE DAY!
    "I set to work to read the Act of Parliament by which the Bank of England was created. The investors knew what they were about. Their design was to mortgage by degrees the whole of the country...lands...houses...property...labour. The scheme has produced what the world never saw before -- starvation in the midst of abundance." -- William Cobbett, "The Political Register", XVIII, July 14 th, 1810.


    Read more: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED | The History The US Government HOPES You Never Learn! http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/#ixzz5Z1nn7iLV

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great presentation! Now to get younger people to open their minds a little bit to hear the message with both ears and have it click on the light. Every morning I ask for more information to be revealed and for the ability to gain clarity. I've spent almost 3 years doing nothing but research, and I'm still not getting through to my son's and daughter. We were given the choice of Life. Life is not slavery.

    ReplyDelete
  3. alanedward says;

    Make a doctors app. for a physical, create a document "certificate of life" stating you are in fact "Alive, sentient living man or woman" and are not dead or a corpse..! have the Doctor sign it for you. you now have a witnessed statement by one of THEIR servants you are not and cannot be what they presume you to be, one of their slaves. this I have done and they do not talk to me anymore...LOL

    Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators case:
    “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the MIND ONLY with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that NO government, as well as any law agency, aspect, court, etc., can concern itself with anything other than Corporate, Artificial Persons and the Contracts between them.” (emphasis added). S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United States 1795, [Not the “United States Supreme Court” -ed.]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the doctor himself is a dead corporate fiction than how can he sign anything and it be valid?
      I would day that most people have no clue about the legal name fiction including doctors, no?

      Delete
    2. alanedward says;
      the document is just validating that "i" am not dead nor a corpse. i do not care if the doctor comprehends any part of it. she did not comprehend and it was interesting to get her to sign it. she was puzzled but did in fact sign it. now i use it when applicable and is very effective. there is a specific format for the document. you do not have to mention the fiction, you just state that you, your name in all lower case is in fact alive and not dead or a corpse. it is not necessary to distinguish "you" from the fiction other than what is stated. you are alive and not dead.

      i created it for a specific application as an exhibit in a court filing. like i said, it was very effective.. they disappeared like ghosts.

      Delete
    3. Certificate of life.

      I, Dr. _________________________, do hereby witness, State and declare on this ____day of
      this month of__________, year of_______, certify that the flesh and blood man known as [lower case name,] accouchement [Birth] date month, day, year, time am, pm “* First in time,
      First in line." As Stated on the enclosed Certificate of live birth received by local register In City, State on [Registration date] month, day, year, presented himself before me for physical exam on the herein stated date and is Not dead, Not a “CORPSE” and is in fact a live and breathing sentient man to date.


      M.D. Name:__________________________

      (Signature of attesting Medical Doctor) ______________________________

      Address:____________________ ___________________________

      __________________________ Phone No.___________________


      *"Between equal equities the first in order of time shall prevail."

      Delete
    4. alanedward says;
      the above outline is the first page of three pages. i hope this may help and will give you an idea of how to start. if you go into a court of "Equity" the "Attorneys" cannot be heard by the judge as they are dead corpses, you are the only live sentient and the only voice that can be heard. try reading Gibson's suits in chancery, J.N. Pomeroy, or Joseph Story. you can find them all for free in PDF on the internet. this is the real ammunition.

      isn't it amazing there is such an abundance of the most expensive thing in the world; ignorance, and the the most valuable thing in the world can hardly be given away for free; wisdom

      Delete
    5. alanedward, why in your form signed by a licensed doctor do you not use proper English spelling by capitalizing the first letter of your name, it being a proper noun?


      What other parts are there to this doctor signed form you might suggest would be useful to include in presenting it to the court?

      Do you think it is necessary to make the presentation of this doctor signed letter at the very commencement of any court hearing, for example when the all caps NAME is called to confirm it is present?

      What type of case did you use it for? Civil or Criminal? Was the court a Superior Court, a Municipal court, or a United States District Court? What documentation did the court issue as its record of the court activity following your presentation of the doctor signed form, to make their record of the disposition of the case?

      I have previously searched for the case you cited with no success in finding it :"Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators".
      Can you tell me exactly where that case is to be found?

      I have long known that documents prepared by the official members of the legal system are especially useful to use as exhibits in a court case since the court is obliged to "see" and recognize the validity of a document created by one of their own legally recognized actors. A State licensed Doctors authentication of your being a live man would be one of these officials in their system.

      So it appears this could be an effective method to force the judge to "see" you are a living man, not just the paper fiction created by the B.C.. It would then make sense that as a living man the court -dealing strictly with legal paper fictions, not living breathing man or woman, - has no way of dealing with your facts other than to get you out of the court. Any further comments are appreciated.

      Delete
    6. alanedward says;

      LOL... firstly, you are in a way creating a "New" birth certificate by mimicking what "They" did to begin with and then converting. As the "Christians" would say, "Born again"...LOL

      secondly, "i" would not and do not use my "surname" [serpent name] that is partial to the DOG-LATIN counterfeit. as is the "Capitalization" to answer your question. i do not use the surname any longer. read this https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/

      For all who have over looked it, the "FICTION STRAWMAN" has been a "Federal employee" since the date of "Registration" and you have been labeled as such, and as the maxim goes, well "a workman is worthy of his hire" and has yet never been "Compensated" Sooo, the way i see it is, i am due for a "Golden parachute" and I put in my letter of resignation and claim...LOL they are the ones who insisted to label me as a federal employee...LOL

      As for Court, if you are ever unfortunate enough to be in one, well all that needs to be said is the "Cliches" stick to the cliches no matter what.

      I am the beneficiary of the entity you are identifying, I decline any and all offers to contract, I do not concede to any presumptions and do not agree to any of the proceedings going on here today that are adverse to my best interest..!

      you will very shortly find yourself being dismissed and screamed out of the court room...LOL this is first hand experience speaking here. PS "DO NOT CROSS THE BAR..!"

      Delete
  4. NOTE TO PAUL: The ad the link goes to suggest to subscribe to get the free report but there is no Link.

    "The information we give you is completely free of charge and we operate by donations only. Get your free report by subscribing. You can unsubscribe at any time."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You must enter a valid email address in the form at the bottom, and the link is in the first email that comes from the system.

      http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/03/a-report-to-world-from-judge-anna-von.html

      Delete
    2. Paul, clicking on the ad above takes you to landing5. Two choices 1. click to play the video or click the video link. That page has only the link to the youtube video. There is no form on that page. You must be talking about a different page unless it doesn't show up for Canadian viewers.

      Delete
    3. If you scroll to the bottom of landing5.html ( http://annavonreitz.com/landing5.html ) what is the last thing you see at the bottom? There should be a form from AWeber on the left and Anna's picture on the right. Those are under the last paragraph.

      The last paragraph is

      Get the knowledge you need to protect you and your family and your property in the crisis coming to America. Your first name and email is all you need. Your information is totally safe with us. The information we give you is completely free of charge and we operate by donations only. Get your free report by subscribing. You can unsubscribe at any time.


      What browser are you using, and what operating system are you using?

      This all appears on all 3 computers in this office. 1 Window 10, 2 windows XP, 3 Windows 7

      Paul
      please email me about this at pstramer@gmail.com

      Delete
  5. alanedward: So Doctors who swear the hippocratic oath may have the power to free us? That would be awesome1

    ReplyDelete
  6. Alanedward....I like that story! On it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Inpower Movement had something in the Notice of Liability process regarding affidavits. It was my understanding that Corporations cannot issue them and therefore can never refute them as a result only the living man can. I should think something along that line might be true as a witness to the living man/woman patient. Not sure if it would hold up in court as identity verification though. The NOL is to move liability unto the living beings running corporations making them liable not the corporation. I suspect more on the 'civil' common law aspect.

    ReplyDelete
  8. alanedward, why in your form signed by a licensed doctor do you not use proper English spelling by capitalizing the first letter of your name, it being a proper noun?


    What other parts are there to this doctor signed form you might suggest would be useful to include in presenting it to the court?

    Do you think it is necessary to make the presentation of this doctor signed letter at the very commencement of any court hearing, for example when the all caps NAME is called to confirm it is present?

    What type of case did you use it for? Civil or Criminal? Was the court a Superior Court, a Municipal court, or a United States District Court? What documentation did the court issue as its record of the court activity following your presentation of the doctor signed form, to make their record of the disposition of the case?

    I have previously searched for the case you cited with no success in finding it :"Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators".
    Can you tell me exactly where that case is to be found?

    I have long known that documents prepared by the official members of the legal system are especially useful to use as exhibits in a court case since the court is obliged to "see" and recognize the validity of a document created by one of their own legally recognized actors. A State licensed Doctors authentication of your being a live man would be one of these officials in their system.

    So it appears this could be an effective method to force the judge to "see" you are a living man, not just the paper fiction created by the B.C.. It would then make sense that as a living man the court -dealing strictly with legal paper fictions, not living breathing man or woman, - has no way of dealing with your facts other than to get you out of the court. Any further comments are appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Did you have to notorize the doctors letter...!!

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.