Water right fight goes national in the news

It's not just a fight about water rights in Montana!

Montana is in a fight for it's life and the freedom of private property rights including water rights that will set the precedent for the whole nation in coming months and years.

Montanans fight to the last drop over precious water rights!

This water rights fight has been picked up by national news now. They realize that this will set a precedent for the whole country.

The feds are using the tribes as a vehicle to take over the water and land in all the western states.

Read this article:

http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/montanans-fight-to-last-drop-over-precious-water-rights/

WE ARE ALL MONTANANS NOW

By Jim Beers 
Feb. 17th 2015

A stunning maneuver by the federal government was recently brought to my attention.  While it is directed at the government of the State of Montana concerning shooting ranges; there is a much broader precedent establishment being attempted that concerns every state official and every rural resident that farms, grazes, hunts, fishes, traps, owns animals and/or owns property or recreates in myriad ways on both public and private rural landscapes.

 

BACKGROUND:

-       Since 1987 Montana Shooting Sports Association and the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks have partnered to make about $25 M in grants available to local shooting ranges.  This wildly popular program has made a huge difference in the availability of safe and suitable places for Montanans to shoot and practice gun (and by extension hunter) safety.

 

-       Early in the program, federal funding was sought but insurmountable red tape from several federal sources made such funding impractical.  For more than a decade, in-state hunting license fees were used to fund the program

 

-       The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has always administered the program and this was confirmed in a State Statute in 1999.

 

-       State funding budgets are confirmed every two years (the Legislature meets every two years).

 

-       In the last two funding cycles, the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has diverted nearly all of this funding from the State budget for other purposes not budgeted by the Legislature such as employee pay raises.

 

-       This year the State Legislature is considering proposing putting the money they authorize for shooting ranges into a separate account to be used ONLY for shooting ranges.

 

-       The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks objects to this, claiming it violates the Pittman Robertson (Wildlife Restoration) Act that is the basis for federal collection of Excise Taxes on guns, ammunition, archery paraphernalia and certain imports.  Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks notified the US Fish and Wildlife Service Excise Tax administrators who have threatened to deny all Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration funds (over $27M last year) if the State tells their own agency where to spend the money they authorize for shooting ranges.  As a result, the State’s own wildlife agency is fixing to oppose the State legislature and Governor’s exercise of their duly elected and sworn duty to exercise oversight and set priorities OVER THEIR OWN EMPLOYEES WORKING IN THE STATE AGENCY THEY ESTABLISHED, AUTHORIZED, FUND AND FOR WHICH THEY (THE LEGISLATURE AND GOVERNOR) ARE THE SOURCE OF THEIR POWER AND CONTINUING OPERATION.

 

FURTHER FEDERAL BACKGROUND:

 

-       The US Fish and Wildlife Service Office that was notified by the State agency was the Federal Aid Program.  This State Excise Tax oversight office is the very office that “saw no evil, heard no evil, and said no evil” twenty years ago when their political bosses stole $45 to 60M of the Excise Taxes from the state agencies (and you and me and our wildlife programs financed by our license dollars and equipment purchases) and then used the money secretly to capture Canadian wolves and release them in Yellowstone plus open a new office in California to all but share space with the environmental extremist and animal rights radical organizations that were replacing the historic wildlife management and wildlife users organizations as federal partners.  Both the wolves and the office had been turned down by Congress and were refused authorization before the appointees, bureaucrats and the administration decided to simply steal the money, release the wolves and build the new office anyway.

 

-       This federal office oversees the operation of state wildlife agencies for compliance with Excise Tax uses named as “eligible” in the law and the operation of the state wildlife agency activities and uses of license revenue to remain eligible for their annual share or “Apportionment” of available Excise Taxes based on their area and the sale of hunting licenses in the state.  Historic violations included Excise Tax or license dollars used to purchase vehicles for state motor pools; or such funds used to pay state parks’ employees; or hatchery fish or upland birds released on the private property of donors and politicians; or lands purchased with such funds used to build a prison; or revenue from timber sales on such lands put in the General Treasury; or selling wildlife for profit.  These are examples of “diversions” and were supposed to be detected by audits by the overseers every five years as required by the law.  Despite this requirement, the twenty years preceding the theft of the $45 to 60M were marked by the all-but disappearance of any audits, a hiatus that was welcomed by federal and state bureaucrats as their working “relationship” became closer and closer and more and more “informal”.  When the theft of the money was exposed by a Government ACCOUNTING Office Audit, an audit firm was hired to audit every state wildlife agency and then to re-establish a 5-year cycle as required by law, corruption again reared its ugly head.  Less than 3 years into the audits, the auditors had had found millions of dollars in “diversions”; the states were screaming (quietly); and federal bureaucrats wanted no more scandals: so the auditors were fired for being “behind schedule” and the Interior Department Inspector General who was simultaneously responsible for overseeing US Fish and Wildlife Service (?) was then “hired” to resume the audits.  Needless to say, the “diversions” were evidently “mistakes” and never reported; and that particular Inspector General was introduced later by President Obama at his first State of the Union as the “New Inspector General for the Stimulus Program” that consisted of billions and which, like the state PR audits, was found to be as pure as the driven snow.

 

-       An “Acting Chief” of the above Office responded to the letter from the Director of the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks about shooting ranges and how those mean old Legislators and the Governor were about to tell the all-wise and smarter-than-everybody-else agency what to do!  Imagine!  Well, the
“Acting” (federal) Chief in what can only be described as an arrogant and laughable (if everyone rolls over for him) way said in his “view” (??) such administration by the State elected officials would “render Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks ineligible for further participation in the benefits (i.e. Excise Tax funding) of the (Wildlife and Sport Fish Program)”. 

 

He told the downtrodden State Director that, in “our (federal government?, USFWS?, Solicitor?, a frog in his pocket?) view the (sic Montana) FWP would suffer a loss of control of its hunting and fishing license revenues” if the proposed bill was passed.  All the State Director does is to tell the State officials that he will therefore be compelled to oppose the attempt by the Governor and Legislature to tell him (and “his” employees) what to do or how to do it.  The fact that the State Director offered no blowback to the federal threat is, take my word, a clue.

 

Two reasons given for this federal threat to deny any future Excise Tax sharing are taken from the Code of Federal Regulations govern the PR Act in the letter:

1.)  “Revenue from hunting and fishing licenses (must) be controlled only by the State Fish and Wildlife Agency.”

Does this mean that the Governor or Legislature cannot set priorities and expenditures for lawful and eligible Wildlife and Fisheries activities?  Of course not!  Can anyone argue that this Excise Tax program for conservation has contained within it for over 70 years an authority for federal bureaucrats to not merely assure that State governments did not MISUSE Excise Tax and Licenses dollars BUT TO DENY STATE GOVERNMENTS ANY ROLE IN THE ACTIVITIES AND PRIORITIES THEREOF FOR THEIR WILDLIFE AGENCY TO PURSUE JUST, LEGITIMATE AND ELIGIBLE (UNDER THE PR ACT) FISH AND WILDLIFE PROJECTS (that both the Act and the State agency share and agree on?  Since when did the responsibility to assure compliance intended to protect “Eligible Uses” of Excise Tax and License dollars morph into a federal bureaucrat power to tell the duly elected officials of a State government to stand down because the federal bureaucrats doesn’t agree with their and the people of the state’s priorities?

2.)  “Revenues from hunting and fishing licenses can only be used for administration of the State fish and wildlife agency which includes only the functions required to manage the agency and the fish and wildlife related resources for which the agency has authority under State law” and, “A State becomes ineligible to receive the benefits of the Act if it diverts hunting and fishing license revenue from purposes other than the agency’s administration.”  Really?

The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks was given the administration authority over shooting ranges by the Montana Legislature in 1999.

But, I am sure you are thinking, what about the federal view of shooting ranges especially in these days of gun control hysterics and the most anti-gun administration in my lifetime?

The PR Act and the Regulations promulgated under it define “Eligible Uses” of Excise Tax dollars and license revenues as “Constructing, operating and maintaining recreational firearms shooting and archery ranges” right alongside other eligible uses such as, “Management of wild bird and mammal populations”, “Managing wildlife habitat”, and “Providing public use that benefits from Wildlife Resources”. 

So the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has the authority to manage shooting ranges and shooting ranges in totality are an “eligible use” under the federal Act and under State law, and the Governor and Legislature simply want more emphasis on it and for the agency to stop diverting shooting range money from where the State Legislators direct.  How does the federal bureaucrat suggest they do that other than what they are considering?  Will the federal bureaucrat pay for it like “the People” want?  Will the federal bureaucrat even allow the Governor and State Legislature to even speak with these ostensible crybaby employees or will they just get their priorities from Washington henceforth?  Federal priorities for Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, given their way, span everything from wolves and grizzly “management” in accord with federal dictates to fooling a hostile Montana public into allowing federal “free-roaming buffalo” to be loosed like Yellowstone wolves once were and for eventually the State to “assume management” (how sweet that sounds) of the latest federal imposition following federal dictates on rural Montana in cahoots with State employees.  All that takes money and Lord knows Montanans may want shooting ranges but federal bureaucrats want gun control and control of these ostensible “State” agencies AND their license revenue And their Excise Tax dollars to do what Montanans are obviously too dense to realize they should be doing if only they could see “the big picture”.

Finally, I had some extraneous, but I believe relevant, thoughts as I wrote this:

-       I note that the State agency is “preparing to argue against HB 234”.  This plus their request to federal overseers and then the absence of any blowback by the state agency to argue for the State (and evidently NOT the State agency’s) position leads me to believe that this State agency (like many others) is much more of a federal subcontractor agency than a State Agency.  As Struther Martin said in the movie Cool Hand Luke, I think that regarding the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks; the Governor and Legislature have “a failure to communicate”. 

-       State agencies are generally reluctant to identify with “shooting ranges” in these days of national and international environmental and animal rights “awareness”.  Shooting Ranges are generally like Trapping and Animal Control in these regards in that they anger those out to eliminate hunting and fishing and do things like loose free-roaming buffalo on rural Americans.

 

-       Wolves and grizzlies and like critters are loosed on a rural populace by federal bureaucrats and then “turned over” to state (is it their governments or one of these “independent” agencies???) management.  This federally mandated management of these animals is expensive and the federal bureaucrats and State bureaucrats WANT FULL CONTROL OF ALL STATE FUNDS AND PRIORITIES WITHOUT ANY ACCOUNTABILITY TO STATE GOVERNMENTS OR STATE TAXPAYERS.  This is not unrelated to these federal PR bureaucrats and State agency bureaucrats colluding to do just that with STATE LICENSE FUNDING EXPENDITURES AND PRIORITIES.

 

-       Federal bureaucrats these days accrue significant political and career benefits from enacting ways to further restrict gun uses, gun availability and ammunition supplies. Examples are – The secret negotiations by the State Department under Clinton and Kerry to negotiate a UN Small Arms Treaty that will shrink or abolish the 2^nd Amendment.  The Fast and Furious federal gun-running scheme into Mexico intended to create justification for more gun control that has never been explained.  Closure by EPA of the last lead smelter in the US.  Continuous statements by the President and Attorney General about the need to register and confiscate guns, etc…….  Is it not possible that any federal bureaucrats that can establish a PRECEDENT to abolish any vestige of State control of their state wildlife agency, or their state wildlife license revenue, or such agency’s activities, AND SIMULTANEOUSLY POINT THE WAY ON HOW TO STOP AND REVERSE THE GROWTH OF SHOOTING RANGES might not at least be in line for a bonus and maybe an eventual promotion and all that portends?  I do not doubt that this is involved in this whole tug of war between the government of Montana on the one hand and the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks & US Fish and Wildlife Service “partners” on the other.

 

Consider YOUR State wildlife agency.  It gets Excise Taxes and dances to a federal tune that is steadily pushing YOU and YOUR STATE GOVERNMENT out of the picture.  If Montana succumbs here; whether because of State employees that serve Washington and not your state government or because of federal bureaucrats that have silenced your organizations and are working so closely with your enemies that you won’t see what is happening until it is too late is immaterial: you will be like that lonesome German noted in the early 1940’s, “when they came for me, no one was there”.  Truly we are all Montanans in these regards.

 

Allow me two analogies: State wildlife agencies are becoming like that famous horse Lincoln once noted was bucking and got his foot caught in the stirrup and his rider (the Governor, Legislature and people of the state) leaned over and told him if he will just calm down, “I will get off so you can get up”.

 

The federal agencies (US Fish and Wildlife Service with its ESA and easement schemes with radicals; the US Forest Service with its Roadless/Wilderness/Grazing Shutdowns/Logging & Timber Management Elimination; BLM with its Bundy Fiascoes and selective use and management shutdowns; and National Park Service with its Viewsheds/Historic Zones/Total anti-natural resource management and use mission) are like Oscar Wilde’s famous Picture of Dorian Gray.  He was an outwardly handsome and wealthy man that made a pact with the devil that his secret life of corruption and vice would only be noted on a painting of himself hidden away in his attic while he stayed forever young and spotless.  Just as Dorian met an horrific end, so too will these federal agencies that are operating on a no longer real image that was once true but any longer simply conceals an existence of harm to people and abuse of power that will eventually end in something much worse than anyone imagines.

 

Jim Beers

17 February 2015

The Water Compact - Who Gets What?

TRIBES SPEND MILLIONS ON HIGH POWERED PUBLIC RELATIONS CAMPAIGN ENGINEERED BY AN EXPENSIVE DC LOBBYING AGENCY TO SUPPORT A MONTANA WATER COMPACT BEING HEAVILY OPPOSED BY PRIVATE WATER RIGHT OWNERS.

February 8, 2015—-by Fred Kelly Grant, Chairman of Board and CEO Stand and Fight Club Inc.

Many historically significant battlefields are visited annually in Montana.  Today, another historic battle is being fought over water, and the battle field is the Montana statehouse.   A water compact between the United States, the state of Montana and the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes will award even off reservation water rights to the Tribes.  Some opponents of the Compact say that the Tribes will be given the right to direct distribution of water even off reservation.  A reading of the convoluted 1600 page compact seems to support their belief.

It would be a big mistake for owners of private water rights outside the state of Montana to overlook the importance of this hotly contested water issue.  If successful in their efforts, legislative supporters of the compact will create a pattern that will endanger private rights wherever private, Tribal and federal water interests collide.

Private property owners throughout the state have voiced strong objections to the compact sponsored by a senator who formerly opposed the compact concept.  In an email exchange with a constituent, the sponsor explains that after “several hundred hours” of study, he sees the wisdom in negotiating the off-reservation Tribal rights.  But so far, I haven’t been able to detect significant changes in the compact that would protect private water rights, and there is no explanation by supporters of where those changes are located in the document.

One worry I would have as a Montanan would be the extensive immunity from liability the producers of the compact and the bill to implement it give themselves.  I don’t believe in 50 years in the business, I have ever seen such an all-out, all inclusive effort by drafters and supporters to give themselves immunity.  I would always worry if a proponent of a legislative or administrative act says:  “What we are doing is straight legal and constitutional, but if that isn’t clear, we want it absolutely clear that we are not responsible for the unconstitutionality and we want it even clearer that we are immune from liability for creating an unconstitutional taking.”

Unsatisfied with the sponsor’s answer to him, the constituent from Troy Montana made this statement:

Our corporate attorney for several decades has passed
away, but I still remember one of his favorite statements that fits many
situations – He said every negotiation, no matter what it was in regards
to, ended by answering the question of Who Gets What? Since well over 2
million dollars has been spent for advertising to attempt to convince the
people to accept this compact, who is paying that and what do they get?
Many people of influence have changed their mind after meeting with the
tribes or the feds or both, all of which begs the question – Who Gets What?

One thing that is clear here is that we do know that  high-power DC lobbying, public relations company, Mercury, is getting $1 million dollars to run the campaign to persuade the legislators to vote “yes” and to persuade the Montana citizenry that everything is kosher about a “yes” vote. And, we know that the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes entered into the contract to pay the million to Mercury.  In addition, they have set aside another $1.8 million dollars for other unspecified public events (to be run by Mercury, one wonders?) . . . . . . . . . . . . 

http://tvfmontana.org/?p=2955  

“Wake up, Montana, before special interests; Uncle Sam and/or the Salish Kootenai buy enough advertising to convince your legislator to capitulate to their demands.  Make no mistake—they want it all. and too many people we have sent to Helena seem willing to help them get it.   The U.S. Justice Department has never backed off from representing tribal interests on the reservations—now the Compact opens the door to a whole new playing field.  It makes perfect sense for the federal government to ante up 1.2 billion dollars if it can buy them the ability to see that control of water in the entire Clark Fork Basin is placed within their grasp as custodians of tribal interests. Water is today’s gold!”

http://tvfmontana.org/?p=2955   

ernie wayne ter Telgte to Motor Vehicle Division

The following letter was mailed by US Postal mail to the Motor Vehicle Division in Helena by ernie wayne ter Telgte in response to a letter they sent out which you can see at this link:

http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/coverlettercure.pdf

Can some person explain to me why STATE OF MONTANA has de-clared pre-deceasement onto it's citizen CIVILITER MORTUUS ?

A notice to the TRUSTEE of the TRUST: STATE OF MONTANA :
Greetings.
This notice is to inform the above TRUSTEE, whose NAME is un-known to me, that a TRUST document, referring to a TRUST: ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE, and bearing a LICENSE OF TRUST #1004319614115, and further claim that scribe trust was created, by a parent trust: STATE OF MONTANA, on 10-15-1961; and that , due to said trust's failure to pay a levied fine against it, it's license to navigate has been posted indefinitely by the TRUSTEE: STATE OF MONTANA, who is the trusty that was required, by law, to appear and / or pay any costs / fines / fees, etc., such as this, associated to TRUST: ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE:
i must , by law, cause the clarification to this seemingly clouded title: ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE, CORPORATE TRUST:

1. i am by nature, caused to be a living man;
2. all allegations contrary to this instantly place such allegors under burden of proof;
3. i deny the ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE TRUST as to be i, or represent 'i', in any way;
4. any appearance contrary to #3, cause engagement of #2, resulting in lack of full disclosure on part of STATE OF MONTANA as claiming creationary status of life;
5. any attempt of any allegor as to cause 'i', FICTITIOUS CORPORATE TRUST : ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE, causes immediate commitance: CAPITAL OFFENSE, as in no way am i qualified for officer positions regarding TRUST:ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE; which causes contrary allegors to be investigated for incompetency as intending to commission and commit GRAND THEFT IDENTITY, 'CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTIO';
7. which is, in itself, a capital offense;
8. furthermore, such TRUST: ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE is held under Global/International banking trust law of Rome, and
9. which is ecclesiastical in TRUST FORM/LAW PERTINENT; 1540 a.d.,
10. and held, by CHARTERS of LAWFUL, (OR NOT) OPERATIONS, under the auspices of the current Pope Francis,
11. who retains sole jurisdiction of the aeris (air); and as such, Popes are the only 'entities' who can inflate or deflate such TRUSTS;
12. which such UNITED STATES CHARTER has now been stripped, thru 13 July 2013 papal proclamation: MOTU PROPRIO, of immunity from such #10/#11 inspections of CHARTER; necessitating the setting of a
13. time frame, established by Pope Francis, of 3 years, ending mid 2016, in which:
A) review of all corporate charters B) are being reviewed, by Rome, for C.) the purpose of discovery - "according to charter and lawful"... or not;
14.which will then result in continued operation 'lawful'; OR
15. revocation of said CHARTERS will result in TRUST DEFLATION and
16. Liquidation of assets
17. of which i, the living man, am not , by volunteerism, TRUST CHATTEL; this non-compliance of 'i' to claims of such trust holders, based on lack of full disclosure as noted on page 1, #s 1-4, other #s non exclusive;
18, which brings about then, a necessary investigation into the ENCHARTERMENT: STATE HOOD STATE OF MONTANA into and under as a sub-franchise TRUST CORPORATE 1889; UNITED STATES
19. which investigation reveals the pre-1889 Montana State and it's 1855 Hellgate Treaty Montana territory
20.as to have been FRAUDULENTYLY breached by force of 1871 UNITED STATES / CODE / STATUTES, and was
21. created by the B.A.R. as B.A.R.'S government for occupation of the former 1789 united States, which said
22. B.A.R. colluded and conspired to invade and conquer, via the 1861 - 1865 civil war; (emergency war power act)
23. at the beginning of which, Abraham Lincoln by-passed congress (the IM Mature Body) and proclaimed all States as to be "enemies of the United States,"in perpetuity";
24. which placed all state citizens under Martial Law, forever, and such Martial Law still apparently
25. carried out under the 1864 Lieber Code as conscripted by Francis Lieber and based on " Frank" "Law", vs. "civiliter mortuus", (not a court case;) a phrase;
26. which in Black's 5th means "dead in view of law"; the condition of one who has lost his civil rights and capacities and is accounted dead in law";
27. which, such death is identified in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS: TRUST NAME,
28. and this is the estate trust: State OF MONTANA identifies itself as, and
29. caused by the requirements of the B.A.R. via ENCHARTERMENT: STATEHOOD; united states; 1871 corporate:
30. and which STATEHOOD OF DEATH then identifies it's STATE CITIZENS
31. as estate named: 'DECEASED', entrusted as "CIVILITER MORTUUS",
32. also known as CAPITUS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA, (S.S. = coordinates: "Grave Site"...)
33. there-by leaving the naturally living persons as seemingly DEAD PERSONS & CALLED strawman trust;
34. which is claimed as actual by the STATE OF MONTANA, as it carries on war against it's own citizens,
35. and such war announced upon the face of STATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE at birth of infant, = SUDDEN DEATH', and
36. who is then held as a DECEASE PRISONER OF WAR, 'CIVILITER MORTUUS for entire life, an enemy in perpetuity of the B.A.R.'UNITED STATES'.
37. and which is now endurant of a papal inspection as to "operating according to Charter and Lawfully",
38. which, if the 1871 UNITED STATES CORPORATIONAL CHARTER is revoced
39. then so shall be all sub-charters granted for statehood: STATE OF MONTANA due to incompetency and mal-intent of B.A.R. UNITED STATES
40. followed by Papal deflation of UNITED STATES TRUST, CORP.U.S. 1874;
41. STATE OF MONTANA TRUST;
42. followed by Papal seizure of all/ ALL 'ACTORS AND CONSENTORS to the ACTS of the ACTORS'; "MOTU PROPRIO";
43. followed by liquidation of the assets claimed by such corporate TRUSTS, (assets = citizens as chattel...)
44. and this is why i truthfully and steadfastly deny any claims laid upon ' i ', the naturally living man;
45. further-more, as regards the selfclaimed 'judge' from a court in GALLATIN COUNTi, Dept.1;
46. his name is RICK WEST- JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, & whose oath appears 'non - sub - scribed'; and
47. who is under allegations of corrupt capitalism via the court registry investemt system, aka the 'C.R.I.S. REPORT'; (='fraudulent enrichment')...
48. who was filmed, by KBZK channel 7 Fox News, as he stripped certified C.R.I.S. report documents; 'FIERIES FACIAS' orders of UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ='Thou Shalt Give Answer!', then
49. which, at that point, Rick West sealed remaining files re:ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE TRUST, even
50. forbidding Sheriff Gootkins deputy access to said file, before witnesses;
51. whose staff was complicit in charging a $25.00 access fee prior to outright prohibitance / public file;
52. who wilfully flew the sole (flag) standard of war mari-time in his court, on behalf of B.A.R.'S 1871 UNITED STATES: GOVERNMENT;
53. who, due to his own bias, forced himself into a position of having to recuse himself from the next two movements of war that the STATE OF MONTANA thought to bring upon ' i '';
54. who transferred another claimed justice of the peace as a substitute for himself; ARTHUR J. BEHAR,
55. who did commence the appearance of a 1789 Constitutional Common Law Court, laying great claims as to such;
56. and who, by order of RICK WEST, failed to have removed from RICK WEST'S court, the SOLE STANDARD FLAG OF WAR MARITIME; 'MARI CLAUSUM';
57. who, by order of RICK WEST, caused to be forbidden all method of record, which is the purpose of such courts of no record...; for hiding PRIVATE PIRACY... and
58. thru whom, ultimately, i prevailed by presenting ' i ', myself, seen as to be mature, competent, truthful and more honorable than any actors and consentors, resulting
59. in jury ruling of " not guilty" of resisting arrest": TKT # 13-5029;
60. and which was also filmed by KBZK;
61. yet RICK WEST JUSTICE OF THE PEACE an un - "sub-scribed" (under-written) court actor, flagged on by a consentor named MARTY LAMBERT Pro se' cutor for GALLATIN COUNT-i, pursues the living on behest of an ESTATE TRUST STATE OF MONTANA, which voluntarily entered 'CIVILITER MORTUUM; and a greed to be identified as CAPITES MAXIMA DIMINUTION, rolling this onto your citizens; SHAME ON YOU !!! You are a most unwise TRUSTEE, a most despicable EXECUTOR of CAPITAL CRIMES against the people; a malignant BENEFACTOR / BENEFICIARY, governing the living from your own SEPULCHRE : STATE OF MONTANA; A BANKRUPT CORPORATION;
62 how dare you to think that you can tell the living how to live; each must rule themselves well, harming none;
63. yet you have already, gleefully proclaimed 'our DEATHS; and pirateered,
64. thinking nothing of it, DIS-CLAIMING the harms that you conspire and collude to cause; (Leiber Code - Article II...)
65. and so it is, that with great sadness, i now see that STATE OF MONTANA'S evil leadership, beginning 1889, have turned this part of earth into a gian cemetery, laden with legends which really begins at the 1st claim of England upon this soil;
66. and the B.A.R. son's continue to carry forward the standard of BRITAIN as the desires of their mother's country... the B'nai B'rith hold sway via the Union/Jack;...
67. at this point, i have spent "enough time in the "COMPANY OF DEATH"; and now that i know that your TRUST: STATE OF MONTANA is morraly, metally, spiritually, and physically BANDRUPT, incapable of maturity, rendering STATE OF MONTANA an un-fit lender due to fraud,
68. i do here-by revert, rescind, and revoke your STATE OF MONTANA DRIVER LICENSED as a de-funct credit card, which you never had proper backing to 'loan' or issue any "rights" of any kind, whatsoever; and which you FRAUD-ed me thru;
69. and, as is legally advertised and recommended to do in the case of such cards, i have cut it into many small pieces in order that it never can be used by ANY/any, ever again...; and now,
70. as a living son of soil, i go my way in peace; but the white man cannot...

                                                 - ernie wayne; of the old oaks
       * au'gend: "asset" - authority - 1945
                          noun               websters coll. Dict.  p.65:
1) Any 'item' of 'value' 'owned'.
2) That which is a resource; (HUMAN RESOURCE) as in "character" is an asset

me:  STATE OF MONTANA IS A CORPORATE TRUST which CHARACTERIZES ITSELF AS DEATH, IN OWNERSHIP OF IT'S RESOURCES OF DEATH AS IT'S ASSET. Hmmm... i'm not DEAD, 'nor dead. Hmm... i ani't an 'asset...

now look at "assets", and apply this same knowledge: 'DEAD LINE' /'DEADORS'
[af. "asetz"l from old french "asez" = enough; from latin "ad" = 'to' and 'satis' = 'enough']

1) Law:
    A) The property of a deceased person subject by law to the payment of his (it's) debts and legacies. (Legend/Lagan)
* me: 'property'=character: DEAD
-decease'= DEAD='CIVILITER MORTUUS'
-subject = British Administerial 'Law'
- Law = 'Lex Lares': Myths of 'common law'
his='HIS'= Term of Opprobrium: Lifetime of Shame
-HIS = 'HIS"TRUST' - 'he' never owned;
-debts = 'deador' - bLACK'S 5TH & cASELL'S l.d.
-lEGACIES = legend, capital name: DEATH
B) The entire property, = spirit, mind, body of a person, vs. PERSON = Living vs. DEAD CORPORATION, = Corporation = no soul... or estate, = TRUST ESTATE =DEAD applicable to, = voluntarily, or subject to = by force.  BAR UNITED STATES.
the payment of = harvested / grim reaper his or it's debts. = his; it's = DEADOR- Casell'sLatin Dict.& Black's 5th
2) Ac-count-ing:
The items on the balance sheet of a business, showing the book value of it's resources as real property, cash, materials at any given date.

me: items = chattel = dead characters...
-balance = scales= justice = blind to this mess
-sheet = white papers war = alchemy: tranferrance
-business = corporate' = public trust
-showing = theater= actors & consentors
-book=bookies, etc. = the racetrack-1855
-value = assigned = imagined/'claimed'
-it's = IT'S = TRUST ESTATE:DECEASED
-resources=HUMAN ANIMAL as 'Resources'
-real property = material Body DECEASED VS. living immaterial spirit, sould mind; at any 'given date' = not when gambling on a life insurance future's market... until these 'past' evils are 'stabilized' as 'present' for 'futures!!

CSKT Water Compact Throws Thousands of Montanans “under the bus”

This letter by the President of the Montana Senate, Senator Debby Barrett, needs to be sent out to everyone in Montana, who need to send it to each and every legislator From their area.  SEND THIS OUT UNTIL YOUR FINGERS BLEED.

Paul Stramer

Note:  our sincerest thanks to Senator Debby Barrett President of the Montana Senate, for this OpEd piece concerning the water compact.  It has gone out to newspapers state wide.  It is wonderful to know that our voices have not gone unheard.  Share this with everyone you know!!!!!!!!!!

CSKT Water Compact throws thousands of Montanans “under the bus”

By: Senator Debby Barrett

As a rancher with deep roots on a family place in southwest Montana, I know something about the importance of history—and water rights.  I also understand negotiation and compromise.  That’s why I have served on the state’s Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission since 2011 and voted for some compacts. However, during my time on the reserved water rights commission, I’ve voted “no” to provisions within this compact on seven occasions.  Here is why I will not support the proposed CSKT Compact.

The Legislature’s role is to examine a proposed compact and decide whether or not to enact it into Montana law.  The Legislature’s responsibility and authority includes amending proposals if necessary, and approving all state costs associated with a compact such as this one. (The price tag of the state’s share on the CSKT compact is $55 million total).  But at an informational meeting held by proponents, the Legislature was warned that it cannot amend the proposal.  It’s a “take it or leave it” deal.

That insult to the constitutional role of the Legislature is enough for me to want to leave it. Other proposed compacts have not been thrust on us, the Legislature, with such arrogance and disrespect for Legislators.  But there are other good reasons, too.

The 2013 Legislature refused to ratify the last CSKT Water Right Compact, for many good reasons concerning its legality and equal treatment of this state’s citizens, both on and off the reservation.  In fact, the primary proponents of the Compact this time concede that the previous version was very flawed and needed to be rejected.

Now, it has been re-introduced, but not much changed or improved.  While one portion of it was somewhat re-negotiated during the interim between the 2013 and the 2015 Legislative Sessions, the result did not improve that portion enough to protect local individual water users, both tribal members and nonmembers, and failed completely to address legal and policy shortcomings, on and off reservation, in the original proposal.

Off the Flathead reservation, these failures include more than a dozen permanent surrenders of the Legislature’s authority over water in Montana, allowing the CSKT to choose whether to obey legislative enactments or not and giving them complete immunity from compliance with important aspects of Montana water and environmental law, including the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA).  It also requires the State to give partial ownership of some of its water rights and its contracts for water to the CSKT and to manage those assets for the Tribes’ benefit, rather than all citizens of the State.  In essence, this proposed Compact requires the State to limit its legal authority off the reservation by sharing it with the CSKT--permanently.

On reservation, it gives the CSKT the water right to 110,000 acres of irrigated land owned by individuals, whose irrigation districts have filed on that same water right.  It also reduces irrigation water to many if not all these irrigators, who are tribal members and nonmembers, and it establishes a unique water administration code and governing body, with the State of Montana again compromising its constitutional authority over water rights.

I recognize there are powerful supporters of SB 262, including some elected officials who managed to negotiate changes to the proposals, protecting their constituents at home.  Having heard the evidence as a member of the Compact Commission, I believe the off-reservation in stream flow water rights the Compact gives are not scientifically based or well-grounded in law or history.  But I also recognize that the CSKT and their public relations people have artfully threatened much of the state with water right filings for in stream flows if the Legislature doesn’t simply accept this “take it or leave it” deal.

As a rancher and a Senator who values little ahead of private property rights, I think I know when to call a bluff, and when to stand my ground no matter what.  This is such a time.  Not all values and principles should be compromised away.  I do not believe my fellow ranchers and farmers really want to turn their backs on the thousands of Montanans whose property, including water rights, will be devastated by this proposal.

The proposed CSKT compact is the perfect example of overreaching in negotiations, causing their failure.  The CSKT and federal government on their behalf demanded too much, and the Compact Commission negotiators surrendered too much.  As a state we tried for years to negotiate a deal good for all.  In this compact alone, that has proven to be impossible.  So, it’s time to recognize that this compact is not going to work, and we must prepare to protect the State’s rights, interests,  and sovereignty.  This compact is not just poor policy, sacrificing the rights of thousands of Montanans to protect the rest of the state is the worst policy possible.

Senator Debby Barrett, R-Dillon, is an eight-term lawmaker representing Senate District 36 in the Montana Legislature.  She serves as Senate President for the 64th legislative session.

And here is a message for Governor Bullock and the Montana Legislators who will be voting on this compact.

Published on Feb 7, 2015

Elaine Willman, author of 'Going to Pieces: The Dismantling of the United States of America' says the CSKT Water Compact is like ObamaCare over water in Montana. We must protect Montana's water for ALL Montanans.

ernie wayne ter Telgte Civiliter Mortuus

"Civiliter Mortuus" : p. 223 - Black's 5th 
Civilly dead; dead in the view of the law.
The condition of one who has lost his civil rights and capacities, and is accounted dead in law.

ernie's researched opinions:

ernie: This ties into CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTI which = GRAND REDUCTION/LOSS of Civil rights and mental capacities, resulting in the NAME of the so-called :dead in view of the law:" to become a LEGEND, and held as such in ALL GRAND CAPITAL LETTERS of DECEASEMENT.

This artificial death is put into a TRUST AS A CRYPT= ENCRYPTED FORM and becomes a TITLE OF DEATH, having no need of civil anything: THUS, "NO VOICE/NO STANDING/NO LIVING VALUE, only valued by Death;'s CRYPT KEEPERS.... i.e. vault = TRUST UNITED STATE'S = A CRYPT containing another STATE OF MONTANA = CRYPT, suing AT LAW vs. ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE = another CRYPT; this = CAPITALIZING on DEATH, and because the living take too long to die, PRE-DECEASEMENT has been declared by U.S. CRYPT KEEPERS via SHORT (LIFE) FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE, a type of SUDDEN INFANT DEATH "Syndrome", in order that the 7 million $ life Insurance Valuation can be collected at the moment of BIRTH LIVE = D.O.A., DEAD ON ARRIVAL;

this is enhanced further by the AMORTIZATION PRO-CESS (AIN) revealed in the C.U.S.I.P. C.R.I.E.S.  C.A.F.R. funds, the paychecks from the KEEPERS OF THE DEAD, back unto THEMSELVES, while claiming not to be touched by DEATH because THEY put on the BLACK ROBE which wards off DEATH, yet putting up their Talisman,

HONORABLE RICK WEST, between themselves and the DECEASED ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE; in which so doing, showing double-mindedness = competency as THEIR  own TALISMAN is in "CIVILITER MORTUUS' SPELLING;

Now, all corporate entities announce their own PREDECEASEMENT, Prima Facie, every DOCUMENT; then immediately THEY claim to be the LENDER OF rIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, IMMUNITITES to the DECEASED CIVILITER MORTUUS, CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTIO, reduced and DEAD, to "a STATE OF SILENCE" = "reductio ad absurdum"  =  No Voice due to NO BODY (Home)...

Thus the question: QUO WARRANTO the DEAD give anything at all to the living; how can STATES MORTUUS INCORPORATED/DECEASED/SILENT make any contact with the naturally living, especially to govern the living in any way at all; there-fore, such CAPITAL CLAIMS by the UNITED STATES CIVILITER MORTUUS, CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTIO, Reductio ad absurdum CRYPT DWELLERS/KEEPERS establishes the validity of the CLAIM OF MARTIAL LAW - ABRAHAM LINCOLN- EMERGENCY WAR POWERS ACT 1863;

FRANCIS LIEBER (Lex Libra/Libra lex- Black's 5th FRANK LAW) CODE, 166 ARTICLES RULES OF WAR/ CODE OF CONDUCT 1864; UNITED STATES CORPORATION 1871; CORP.U.S. 1874; BIRTH CERTIFICATE ACT 1906; SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 1933; ALL BANKRUPTCIES UNITED STATES 1871 POST; ALL CLAIMS CAPITAL PRE 1871...; especially all claims of Rome 1411/1412 1707 BRITISH ACTS OF UNION; ALL CLAIMS COMMERCIAL CAPITAL - IS - MAN; ALL ADHESION CONTRACTS - MARRIAGE LICENSE, DRIVERS LICENSE, HUNTING LICENSE, FISHING LICENSE, ETC. LICENTIOUSNESS.

WWW.DEADPEASANTS.BIZ  INSURANCES COMMERCIAL
ALL FORMS POLICY/STATUTE/CODE CLAIMS
and ENFORCEMENT, PRO SE CUTOR IUS;
all BANKING COMMERCIAL
all ACTORS JUDICIAL
all CONSENTORS BAR
all PRIVATE
all PUBLIC

ernie wayne ter Telgte Motions in Liminis

( The following document was filed May 21, 2014 3:39 PM in GALLATIN COUNTY JUSTICE COURT, State of Montana, not Montana state, and forms evidence which contributed along with presentation by the author of the document, that resulted in acquittal) (Lines in Italics and parentheses are not part of the original handwritten document bearing the original court stamp, which I have in my possession)

1. Authority: 1789 Constitution of the united States of America;

My notice: Amendment #1 to said Constitution thru which i claim Full freeness, unabridgeable, to form common, comprehensible sounds as speech, including sounds as symbols on media; nor in any way, do i voluntarily waive any intent positive, towards myself as a living man, as may be expressed, or silent, in said Constitution and Bill of Rights accompanying;

2. Authority: Medical Science;

My notice: i am a natural, living man, composed of the elements of water, soil, air;

3. Authority: Ecclesiastical trust law as began in 1540 a.d., and which is held under CROWN COPYRIGHT LAW;

My notice: that i am not an officer of said trust; nor have i ever, with full knowledge resultant from full disclosure of proffering parties, volunteered to IMPERSONATE any OFFICER;

4. Authority: Judge ARTHUR J. BEHAR'S handwritten notice, on a paper in his possession, that: 

My notice: i proclaimed #s 1-3 to the ADMIRALTY COURT of his jurisdiction, yet he required me to enter into a FOREIGN COURT, reserved only for CORPORATE OFFICERS and THEIR BANKING  activities, which said requirement instantly caused i, the living natural man to be placed, by force, into a state of duress, duly noted by Judge ARTHUR J. BEHAR; and now opens the door to the possibility of tort having been done to my signature intentionally by various county and STATE JUDICIAL and LEGAL ENFORCEMENT ACTORS; some of whom bear TITLES of NOBILITY: ESQUIRE/ATTORNEY, with such titles being forbidden to the States;

6. Authority: 1789 Constitution Article 1- Section 9- sub-section 8 - line 1: "No Title of Nobility Shall be granted by the united States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or Foreign State."; and again in the

7. Authority: 1789 Constitution - Section 10 - subsection 1 - phrase 9: "No State shall ... grant any Title of Nobility.", and such Titles show then, that such BEARERS of Title hold said Title thru the consent of Congress alone, as a Congressional Seal of Approval, such seal called British Accredited Registry, the B.A.R, while the other un-marqued actors afore-mentioned are simply private pirates out for themselves; but, both types require some-one to FALSIFY documents as IMPERSONATING an EXECUTOR;

8. to the proceedings of thich, i do not consent;

9. nor do i consent to being the Surety, the tangible, living mineral asset for, or to , any FICTITIOUS, COMMERCIALIZED, SECURITIZED TRUST; and now, due to the State of duress thrust upon myself by the Court,

10. i command that the ACTORS/STATE bond be immediately brought forward as to establish the evidence, for my inspection, as to who is going to indemnify me, should tort result, in any way to me;

11. Furthermore, i do not consent to the Actors usage of TERMS OF ART,  A.K.A, TERMS OF LEGAL CONTROL/POWER, A.K.A, LEGALESE; to wit, an

12. Authority: UNITED STATES 9TH DISTRICT SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA, directly referenced in DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. DICK ANTHONY HELLER 554 U.S. __ (2008) See p. 3-..."technical meaning"; - "secret or technical meanings that would not have been known to ordinary citizens in the founding generation."; Further such quotes by Justice Scalia, are found in various cites through-out this 63 page CASE: therefore, i here-by motion this current ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION COURT to immediately CLOSE ALL STATE CASES against the Name of i, the living, natural man,.

duress and coercion prime evidence standing
ernie wayne ter Telgte

Certificate of Service and acknowledgement:
that i, the living natural man known as

coercion and duress prime evidence standing
ernie wayne ter Telgte,

have here-by filed this motion in Liminis as my response to the STATE OF MONTANA vs. (not me) ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE, and such response/filing a result of coercion and duress, as noted by JUDGE ARTHUR J. BEHAR on 16 May 2014.  i do not use in any way, any document for the purpose of COPYRIGHT  infringement.

The Question is "Who Owns This Land" the federal government or the states?

Cliven Bundy Answers this question!

Published on Sep 5, 2014

http://agenda21radio.com Cliven Bundy talks with Paul Preston and company at the Liberty Tour Event at Win-River Casino, Redding, CA August 30, 2014. Bundy gets to tell his side of the story and what went on during the Bundy Ranch standoff last May, 2014.
This is the first Liberty Tour Event that will be happening throuout California. If you wish to attend one of these events, tickets are available through http://agenda21radio.com
During his talk Win-River Casino suffered a false alarm fire alert which lasted at least 20 minutes. This time has been eliminated from the youtube video.

Originally found at:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELbgUwk7AZ8#t=203

Did You Know the IRS and the Fed are Private Corporations?

Pao L. Chang, Guest
Waking Times

Most people living in the USA have no clue that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a foreign agency. To be more accurate, the IRS is a foreign private corporation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and is the private “army” of the Federal Reserve (Fed). Its main goal is to make sure the American people pay their tax and be good little slaves.

Evidence showing that the IRS isn’t part of the United States government

Like the Federal Reserve (Fed), the IRS isn’t part of the United States government. Instead, it is a collection agency of the privately owned Fed.

Read this very interesting article and watch the video here:

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/01/27/know-irs-fed-private-corporations/

For much more on how your money, heritage, and freedom have been stolen for decades:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

All government has been incorporated. Look at Dunn and Bradstreet and see every county government listed as a corporation.

The State of Montana is a corporation as opposed to Montana state which is a physical land mass with a border.

You can NOT understand this until you study Judge Anna von Reitz's writings at the above website.

There is a way out of their unlawful system.

The whole truth about the CSKT Water Compact!

Published on Feb 4, 2014

Water Rights expert, Dr. Kate Vandemoer, breaks down the CSKT Water Compact in a simple, and factual, manner.

The Stench Rising from Libby Montana AGAIN

One of my sons saved this young man's life after an auto accident a few years back.  I met him a couple of times.

He was UNARMED when he was shot outside of this woman's home. What lethal force or imminent threat of bodily harm could have justified this killing?

If it was me that did this shooting the way it was done they would lock me up and throw away the key, but this woman hasn't even been charged with manslaughter let alone murder, and was never even arrested. Something smells very rotten in Libby Montana government.

I even heard a rumor that he was shot in the back, not the chest. How about that Bernie?  When will you release the results of an autopsy? Or maybe you didn't even do one, and swept that under the rug?  HOW ABOUT SOME ANSWERS BERNIE?

Paul Stramer.

----- Original Message -----

From: Stephan

To: Paul Stramer at Eurekadsl.net

Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 1:13 AM

Subject: Uninvestigated Murder in Lincoln County

Hi, Paul

Here is a petition for you to send out to your list. Bernie Cassidy is at it again, and this time it is bad. Please sign this petition for the mother’s sake and to piss off Lincoln County. If you want more details, let me know. I am writing up a public records request for the mother to try and get some answers. It has been over a month and no one has talked to her family about the nature of the relationship between the mother in law and wife.

https://www.change.org/p/bernard-cassidy-justice-for-michael-roloff

Thanks to everybody who signs.

Water compact media blitz raises new questions

by icthe4est
Note: A great letter to the Editor from well respected former legislator Aubyn Curtiss.
To the Editor,
MEDIA BLITZ RAISES NEW QUESTIONS
Yes, we know that the Salish/Kootenai tribes are promised $ 1.2 billion if the CSKT Compact is approved & Montana is committed to pony up another $ 55 million. Now we hear that upwards of another million has been added to the mix with the emergence of an intensive media campaign purported to be in the scope of a gubernatorial or presidential campaign—that much in radio contracts alone.
Concerned water users in the Clark Fork Basin, puzzled by the dubious assertions made by the spokesperson for the newly formed group, Farmers and Ranchers for Montana, have had their attention jerked to this even more puzzling development. Who is paying for the radio ad campaign? What special interest can afford the side bar ads on the Internet? They are not cheap.
In an editorial printed here on 1/15 it was indicated that the expressed purpose of the above group is to “educate Montanans about the CSKT. Yet there seems to be no substantive information made available and it seems to be the case with the other promotional ads too. Only glowing statements supporting passage. How can they be so certain when the sponsor of the CSKT bill is still endeavoring this week-end to prepare what he described as a “risk analysis.” This, too, grabs attention when the senator has stated that our county, one of eleven “off-reservation” counties whose water rights could be compromised, is protected.
Montanans do need educating about the 1400 (1500?) page CSKT Compact! We need to learn exactly what Montana stands to gain, other than an ethereal promise of less water litigation. We need to know the cause of these actions hanging over our heads. Are they related to 12,000 actions threatened by the tribes if the CSKT is not passed by the Montana Legislature? Anywhere else that could be perceived as a threat.
We need to know if Montana’s best interest here is the same as the interests of non-tribal water users who have properly filed on water they are putting to beneficial use and depending upon Montana’s Constitution and court system to protect their rights.
We need to know the ramifications of agreeing to a precedent-setting deal—the like of which never before in these United States has given a sovereign tribal nation the right to control distribution of off-reservation water. We know that the U.S. Justice Department will enforce that right, once it is surrendered by Montana, but the big question is who will be defending the rights of John or Jane Doe? Has any thought been given to the number of suits when they discover that their rights have been literally sold down the river? And once other Tribal Nations view the bonanza granted the Salish/Kootenai, what is to prevent them from bringing actions to obtain the same advantage? Endless litigation.
Wake up, Montana, before special interests; Uncle Sam and/or the Salish Kootenai buy enough advertising to convince your legislator to capitulate to their demands. Make no mistake—they want it all. and too many people we have sent to Helena seem willing to help them get it. The U.S. Justice Department has never backed off from representing tribal interests on the reservations—now the Compact opens the door to a whole new playing field. It makes perfect sense for the federal government to ante up 1.2 billion dollars if it can buy them the ability to see that control of water in the entire Clark Fork Basin is placed within their grasp as custodians of tribal interests. Water is today’s gold!

Thanks for opportunity to comment.
Aubyn Curtiss (termed from Senate in 2010)
Twenty-four year veteran of Montana Legislature
House & Senate Judiciary & Natural Resources Committees
Select Water Committee Assignments
Chair, State/Federal Relations Committee

STOP the CSKT Water Compact - Full Micro-Documentary

Published on Feb 1, 2015

Here is the full Mini-Documentary on the CSKT Water Compact Thanks to Purple Planet.Com for the background audio.



You are NOT being told the truth about this compact by the media. There is a multi-million dollar propaganda campaign being waged by the people who want to steal your water!

WE DON'T NEED TO GIVE THE WATER RIGHTS ON OVER 100,000 ACRES TO THE TRIBE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

This is nothing less than an outright theft under the color of law.

AmRRon CH 3 emergency radio project

Introduction to AmRRON -- the American Redoubt Radio Operators Network and The American Preparedness Radio Network. Disaster preparedness communications network for patriots.







Part 2



Part 3



To see some radio gear go to http://www.fm2way.com

For more information call  800 889 2839 or email  pstramer@eurekadsl.net

For the Oathkeepers band plan, which is very similar to AmRRon follow this link:

http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/emergencycommplan.pdf

Notes From The Field "A Fake Bank?" By Simon Black

January 28, 2015   Notes From The Field   By Simon Black

“just because you can log on to your bank’s website and see an account balance printed on the screen doesn’t mean that the money is actually there.”

Sovereign Valley Farm, Chile

Last May, Mr. Wang from Hangzhou, China walked into a bank on Jiangpu Street in Nanjing, opened an account, and made a 12 million yuan deposit.

The bank was new, but it didn’t look different from any other bank that Mr. Wang had been to.

It had a giant vault, counters for the tellers, exchange and interest rates posted on the wall. And above all, it was very elegant.

But after a few weeks, Mr. Wang stopped receiving the interest he’d been promised.
~~~

When he tried to withdraw his money, the bank froze his deposit. So he went straight to the police.

Turns out that even though it had been operating for over a year, it wasn’t actually a licensed bank.

Apparently some people had simply renovated a building to give customers the impression that they were a real bank. But it was a total scam.

Some of the senior executives have since been arrested, and the story is now slowly leaking out to the Western world.

What I find particularly interesting about this story is that it reveals how people have been programmed to hand over our hard-earned savings to complete strangers, simply because we walk into a building and see a vault.

In this case the bank itself was a ‘fake’, i.e. it wasn’t sanctioned by the government.

Candidly, though, I find very little difference from government-licensed banks that recklessly gamble their customers’ money… or that are effectively insolvent to begin with.

It’s crazy to think that very few people ever conduct due diligence on their bank.

You wouldn’t just walk up and hand over your life savings to some bum on the street.

But put him suit standing in front of a vault and suddenly the air of legitimacy compels us to hand over everything to this complete stranger who has a track record of screwing his customers.

We’ve discussed this before. Many banks, particularly in the West, are highly illiquid and borderline insolvent.

You don’t even have to take my word for it. Go see for yourself.

Each quarter, most large banks publish their financial statements. And with a few simple calculations you will be able to see just how illiquid they really are.

Some of the largest banks in the west, for example, state in their financials that they only hold a small fraction (often less than 3%) of their customers’ deposits.

The rest is loaned out or gambled away. It’s not exactly a conservative practice.

Given that they actually publish these results, the banks themselves are telling anyone who’s paying attention that they’re very risky.

Fortunately for them there are very few people paying attention. People simply think that just because it’s a bank, it must be safe.

This Chinese bank happened to be fake. But again, when you look at the actual data, the “real” banks, particularly in the developed West, aren’t much safer.

Bottom line — banking is all about confidence. It’s imperative to have trust and reliability in credible, conservative, strong, transparent financial institutions.

Even if you don’t understand finance, one way to test your bank’s transparency is to ask them for their financial statements.

If they won’t do it, you should not only walk out the door, you should run. And be sure to take all of your money with you.

Handing your money to a stranger DEMANDS transparency. If they’re not willing to be transparent, that’s a bad sign.

As the people of Cyprus found out nearly two years ago, just because you can log on to your bank’s website and see an account balance printed on the screen doesn’t mean that the money is actually there.

For banks, your account balance is a liability -- money they owe you. Think about that: your bank OWES you YOUR own money. Do they have it?

It’s a question worth asking. And a lot of the information is right there in the financials.

Just because there’s a vault in a building doesn’t mean that they’re good for it.

Trust and confidence are built by conducting serious due diligence and making calculated, informed decisions about the strangers that we’re dealing with.

Until tomorrow,   Signature  Simon Black   Founder, SovereignMan.com

If you want more like this go to this website and subscribe:  http://www.sovereignman.com/welcome/

NUMBER ONE WITH A BULLET

Published on Jan 23, 2015

The USA has, by far, the highest per capita gun ownership in the world. Progressives will tell you that this is what makes America the Murder Capitol of Planet Earth. But we're not, and in this devastatingly effective Firewall, Bill Whittle shows why the center of Gun Nut Nation is in fact one of the safest places in the world.

When we are carrying concealed we better have eyes in the back of our heads

Another issue is UNCONSTITUTIONAL gun laws like the stupid Montana prohibited places laws.

The Montana shooting sports association is trying to get that stupid law repealed or modified.

http://leg.mt.gov/bills/2015/billpdf/LC0296.pdf

The permit holder broke concealment.   It's one thing to suspect that somebody is carrying a gun. It's another thing to actually see the gun.

In Montana the person carrying could lawfully have carried the gun openly.  What would this ignorant person who tackled him have done then?

The prohibited places laws are INFRINGEMENT and make no sense whatsoever. 

The reasoning is completely faulty.  They want to disarm law abiding people in these places, to make who safer?

The criminals who carry guns unlawfully anyway!   It certainly doesn't make the law abiding person safer!

Unconstitutional so called "laws" are NOT laws at all. They are null and void.

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html

Gunowner revolt breaks out in another state

Sheriff Thomas Lorey of Fulton County, New York

A sheriff in Fulton County, New York, is taking on that state’s anti-gun establishment by defying an attempt to have legal handgun owners “recertify” their right to bear arms with the state bureaucracy.

New York adopted the sweeping SAFE Act legislation in 2013 with most of the attention focused on a ban on “assault rifles” and high-capacity clips. But a little-known provision of the bill requires every handgun owner to recertify their permit with the local sheriff or clerk’s office by 2018. The counties are then required to upload the permit information to a statewide digital database that is being created. The process must be repeated every five years.

The state has sent out 500 “invitations” to gun owners in several counties asking them to participate in an early pilot program. They are asked to go online and upload their information on each gun they own.

Sheriff Thomas Lorey of Fulton County volunteered his county to participate in the pilot program, only so he could send a message to the bureaucrats in the state Capitol, including Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

“I’m asking everyone that gets those invitations to throw them in the garbage because that is where they belong,” Lorey said at a recent meeting with conservative activists. “They go in the garbage because, for 100 years or more, ever since the inception of pistol permits, nobody has ever been required to renew them.”

The state wants to roll out the new online registration database by February, Lorey said.

“I don’t think they’re going to be able to do it,” he said. “Let’s have everybody’s permit expire the same day and let ‘em see what they’re going to do with it.”

Watch video clip of Sheriff Lorey explaining his position below:

http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/sheriffs-advice-toss-gun-registration-letters-in-trash/#Zyc4UVj4dWyIVsxl.99

What Will Finally Destroy the Constitution

This is a seminar discussing the facts v. fiction of a Constitutional Convention.



The website is:   http://defendnotchange.com/